Ana T Garcia Cabrera, Gustavo Romero-Velez, Xavier Pereira, Joseph T Vazzana, Diego R Camacho
Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been established as a leading treatment of obesity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain the most common complication.
Objective: To compare the incidence of SSIs before and after the implementation of our technique.
Methods: Our intraoperative technique limits enteric contact with the abdominal wall through a wound protector at the end-to-end anastomosis stapler port site, with enteric retrieval with a specimen bag followed by betadine irrigation. We analyzed our SSIs outcomes before and after implementation of our technique in all RYGB and laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversions at our institution performed by two providers between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We compared patient age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The χ2, Fischer exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests, and multivariate analysis were performed.
Results: Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent LRYGB and sleeve-to-bypass conversion during the two study periods. Group 1 (162 patients, 37.76%) all underwent RYGB. Group 2 (267 patients, 62.24%) of whom 199 underwent RYGB and 68 underwent a laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversion. The SSI rate was 9.26% in Group 1 and 2.62% in Group 2 (p = 0.002514). Statistical significance was also noted for operating room time (137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02) and hospital length of stay (2 - 3 interquartile range vs 1 - 2 interquartile range, p = 0.04).
Conclusion: We propose a safe, reproducible technique that significantly reduces SSI rates during LRYGB.
背景:腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)已被确立为肥胖症的主要治疗方法。手术部位感染(ssi)仍然是最常见的并发症。目的:比较手术前后ssi的发生率。方法:我们的术中技术通过端到端吻合器端口处的伤口保护器限制肠内与腹壁的接触,并用标本袋肠内取出,然后用倍他定冲洗。我们分析了在2009年1月1日至2011年12月31日和2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间由两名提供者在我院进行的所有RYGB和腹腔镜套管转旁路手术中实施我们技术前后的ssi结果。我们比较患者年龄、性别、体质指数、美国麻醉医师学会分级;合并症包括高血压,糖尿病和高脂血症。进行χ2、Fischer精确检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和多变量分析。结果:429例患者在两个研究期间接受了LRYGB和套管转桥术。组1(162例,37.76%)均行RYGB。第2组(267例,62.24%),其中199例行RYGB, 68例行腹腔镜套管-旁路转换。SSI发生率1组为9.26%,2组为2.62% (p = 0.002514)。手术时间(137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02)和住院时间(2 - 3四分位数范围vs 1 - 2四分位数范围,p = 0.04)也有统计学意义。结论:我们提出了一种安全、可重复的技术,可以显著降低LRYGB期间的SSI发生率。
{"title":"Decreasing Surgical Site Infection Associated with the Use of Circular Staplers During Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Ana T Garcia Cabrera, Gustavo Romero-Velez, Xavier Pereira, Joseph T Vazzana, Diego R Camacho","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been established as a leading treatment of obesity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of SSIs before and after the implementation of our technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our intraoperative technique limits enteric contact with the abdominal wall through a wound protector at the end-to-end anastomosis stapler port site, with enteric retrieval with a specimen bag followed by betadine irrigation. We analyzed our SSIs outcomes before and after implementation of our technique in all RYGB and laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversions at our institution performed by two providers between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We compared patient age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The χ<sup>2</sup>, Fischer exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests, and multivariate analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent LRYGB and sleeve-to-bypass conversion during the two study periods. Group 1 (162 patients, 37.76%) all underwent RYGB. Group 2 (267 patients, 62.24%) of whom 199 underwent RYGB and 68 underwent a laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversion. The SSI rate was 9.26% in Group 1 and 2.62% in Group 2 (p = 0.002514). Statistical significance was also noted for operating room time (137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02) and hospital length of stay (2 - 3 interquartile range vs 1 - 2 interquartile range, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose a safe, reproducible technique that significantly reduces SSI rates during LRYGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/09/e2022.00056.PMC9840216.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Simin Golestani, Charles Hill, Jawad Ali, Christopher Idelson, Christopher Rylander, John Uecker
Background: A frequently encountered problem in laparoscopic surgery is an impaired visual field. The Novel Intracavitary Laparoscopic Cleaning Device (NILCD) is designed to adequately clean a laparoscopic lens quickly and efficiently without requiring removal from the surgical cavity. Animal and cadaver studies showed good efficacy and a short learning curve. This study aims to describe the efficacy and initial human experience with the device during laparoscopic operations.
Methods: Since 2020, NILCD was used in 167 cases with surgeons at 12 different institutions in Texas, California, and Massachusetts. The rate of scope removal in each case was examined. Following each trial, users were asked to rank the NILCD on ease of set up, insertion, adjustment, and cleaning efficacy. A survey was then used to evaluate surgeon satisfaction.
Results: The NILCD was tested in a variety of cases, including colorectal, gynecological, general, pediatric, hepatobiliary, thoracic, bariatric and foregut surgery. NILCD usage eliminated the need for scope removal in 90.14% of debris events, with only 97 removals in 984 events. Eighty-six percent of users reported that the NILCD improved their visual field. When asked to rate specific qualities of the device using a 5-point Likert scale, surgeons gave an average score of 4.56 for ease of setup, 4.10 for ease of insertion, and 4.12 for ease of adjusting and cleaning efficacy.
Conclusion: In an initial analysis of 167 cases, the NILCD proved to be an effective and convenient method of cleaning the laparoscopic lens in-vivo. It was associated with good surgeon satisfaction.
{"title":"A Clean Sweep: Initial Experience with a Novel Intracavity Laparoscopic Cleaning Device.","authors":"Simin Golestani, Charles Hill, Jawad Ali, Christopher Idelson, Christopher Rylander, John Uecker","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A frequently encountered problem in laparoscopic surgery is an impaired visual field. The Novel Intracavitary Laparoscopic Cleaning Device (NILCD) is designed to adequately clean a laparoscopic lens quickly and efficiently without requiring removal from the surgical cavity. Animal and cadaver studies showed good efficacy and a short learning curve. This study aims to describe the efficacy and initial human experience with the device during laparoscopic operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since 2020, NILCD was used in 167 cases with surgeons at 12 different institutions in Texas, California, and Massachusetts. The rate of scope removal in each case was examined. Following each trial, users were asked to rank the NILCD on ease of set up, insertion, adjustment, and cleaning efficacy. A survey was then used to evaluate surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NILCD was tested in a variety of cases, including colorectal, gynecological, general, pediatric, hepatobiliary, thoracic, bariatric and foregut surgery. NILCD usage eliminated the need for scope removal in 90.14% of debris events, with only 97 removals in 984 events. Eighty-six percent of users reported that the NILCD improved their visual field. When asked to rate specific qualities of the device using a 5-point Likert scale, surgeons gave an average score of 4.56 for ease of setup, 4.10 for ease of insertion, and 4.12 for ease of adjusting and cleaning efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an initial analysis of 167 cases, the NILCD proved to be an effective and convenient method of cleaning the laparoscopic lens in-vivo. It was associated with good surgeon satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/e4/e2022.00066.PMC9840218.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and objectives: Living donor right hepatectomy has become the most common method of liver transplantation. With minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy became possible, but with some limitations. Advancements in robotic technology made it possible to overcome these shortcomings and maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in transplantation. For this reason, some centers have started robotic donor hepatectomy. Our study aimed to introduce our early experience of robotic donor right hepatectomy and investigate the feasibility of this surgery.
Methods: This study included 10 (30%) living donors who underwent pure robotic donor right hepatectomy at Dong-A University Hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The medical records were analyzed to determine the short-term outcomes of these patients.
Results: The total operation time and warm ischemic time were 396.6 min ± 62.7 min and 19.7 min± 5.6 min, respectively. Moreover, there was no transfusion during the operation and no other port use and open conversion. The average real graft volume was 590 mL ± 73.5 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 8.7 d ± 2.6 d. There have been no specific complications noted in the donor group.
Conclusions: Based on our positive experience with pure robotic right hepatectomy for a liver donor, the robotic technique may be a new option for achieving minimally invasive surgery for a liver donor.
{"title":"Early Experience of Pure Robotic Right Hepatectomy for Liver Donors in a Small-Volume Center.","authors":"Eun Jeong Jang, Kwan Woo Kim, Sung Hwa Kang","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Living donor right hepatectomy has become the most common method of liver transplantation. With minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy became possible, but with some limitations. Advancements in robotic technology made it possible to overcome these shortcomings and maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in transplantation. For this reason, some centers have started robotic donor hepatectomy. Our study aimed to introduce our early experience of robotic donor right hepatectomy and investigate the feasibility of this surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 10 (30%) living donors who underwent pure robotic donor right hepatectomy at Dong-A University Hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The medical records were analyzed to determine the short-term outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total operation time and warm ischemic time were 396.6 min ± 62.7 min and 19.7 min± 5.6 min, respectively. Moreover, there was no transfusion during the operation and no other port use and open conversion. The average real graft volume was 590 mL ± 73.5 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 8.7 d ± 2.6 d. There have been no specific complications noted in the donor group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our positive experience with pure robotic right hepatectomy for a liver donor, the robotic technique may be a new option for achieving minimally invasive surgery for a liver donor.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/81/e2022.00063.PMC9726171.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10530073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colin G DeLong, Alexander T Liu, Matthew D Taylor, Jerome R Lyn-Sue, Joshua S Winder, Eric M Pauli, Randy S Haluck
Introduction: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is attributed to primary/idiopathic causes or secondary/mechanical causes, including hiatal hernias (HH). While patients with HH and EGJOO (HH+EGJOO) may undergo HH repair without myotomy, it is unclear if an underlying motility disorder is missed by therapy which addresses only the secondary EGJOO cause. The goal of this study was to determine if HH repair alone is sufficient management for HH+EGJOO patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent HH repair between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2020 was performed. Patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM) within one year before HH repair were included. Patients with and without EGJOO on pre-operative HREM were compared.
Results: Sixty-three patients were identified. Pre-operative HREM findings included: 43 (68.3%) normal, 13 (20.6%) EGJOO, 4 (6.3%) minor disorder or peristalsis, 2 (3.2%) achalasia, and 1 (1.6%) major disorder of peristalsis. No differences between patients with EGJOO or normal findings on pre-operative manometry were found in pre-operative demographics/risk factors, pre-operative symptoms, and pre-operative HREM, except higher integrated relaxation pressure in EGJOO patients. No differences were noted in length of stay, 30-day complications, long-term persistent symptoms, or recurrence with mean follow-up of 26-months. Of the 3 (23.1%) EGJOO patients with persistent symptoms, 2 underwent HREM demonstrating persistent EGJOO and none required endoscopic/surgical myotomy.
Conclusion: Most HH+EGJOO patients experienced symptom resolution following HH repair alone and none required additional intervention to address a missed primary motility disorder. Further study is required to determine optimal management of patients with persistent EGJOO following HH repair.
{"title":"Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient?","authors":"Colin G DeLong, Alexander T Liu, Matthew D Taylor, Jerome R Lyn-Sue, Joshua S Winder, Eric M Pauli, Randy S Haluck","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is attributed to primary/idiopathic causes or secondary/mechanical causes, including hiatal hernias (HH). While patients with HH and EGJOO (HH+EGJOO) may undergo HH repair without myotomy, it is unclear if an underlying motility disorder is missed by therapy which addresses only the secondary EGJOO cause. The goal of this study was to determine if HH repair alone is sufficient management for HH+EGJOO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent HH repair between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2020 was performed. Patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM) within one year before HH repair were included. Patients with and without EGJOO on pre-operative HREM were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were identified. Pre-operative HREM findings included: 43 (68.3%) normal, 13 (20.6%) EGJOO, 4 (6.3%) minor disorder or peristalsis, 2 (3.2%) achalasia, and 1 (1.6%) major disorder of peristalsis. No differences between patients with EGJOO or normal findings on pre-operative manometry were found in pre-operative demographics/risk factors, pre-operative symptoms, and pre-operative HREM, except higher integrated relaxation pressure in EGJOO patients. No differences were noted in length of stay, 30-day complications, long-term persistent symptoms, or recurrence with mean follow-up of 26-months. Of the 3 (23.1%) EGJOO patients with persistent symptoms, 2 underwent HREM demonstrating persistent EGJOO and none required endoscopic/surgical myotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most HH+EGJOO patients experienced symptom resolution following HH repair alone and none required additional intervention to address a missed primary motility disorder. Further study is required to determine optimal management of patients with persistent EGJOO following HH repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/e8/e2022.00051.PMC9673993.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9512132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care.
Database: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles.
Discussion: Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
{"title":"Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Youssef Youssef, Huda Afaneh, Mostafa A Borahay","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Database: </strong>We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/7f/e2022.00015.PMC9385110.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renita Kim, Kristen Pepin, Monalisa Dmello, Nisse Clark, Mobolaji Ajao, Jon Einarsson, Sarah Cohen Rassier
Background and objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.
Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.
Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.
Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.
{"title":"Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.","authors":"Renita Kim, Kristen Pepin, Monalisa Dmello, Nisse Clark, Mobolaji Ajao, Jon Einarsson, Sarah Cohen Rassier","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/fe/e2022.00036.PMC9385112.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ariel de Jesus Martinez-Onate, Alan de Jesus Martinez-Salas, Vania Cazares-Garcia
Introduction: Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) for biliary surgery uses indocyanine green (ICG), a specific dye that is eliminated almost exclusively by the liver and biliary system, making it very useful for an adequate and safe visualization of biliary tract structures.
Methods: We present our experience with FGS for cholecystectomy multiport and single port, including all patients older than 18 years of age, with diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute and chronic), from October 18, 2018 to December 30, 2021.
Results: A total of 47 patients were managed with FGS cholecystectomy, mean age was 61.2 (± 17.7) years, 31 (65.9%) were female and 16 (34.1%) males. Twenty-four (51.1%) were emergency procedures, due to acute cholecystitis, of which 10 (41.7%) presented with an infected gallbladder (Parkland 3 to 5) and three (12.5%) presented with related acute pancreatitis, the remaining 23 (48.9%) cases were elective surgeries, due to chronic cholecystitis. Visualization of laparoscopic fluorescence of the biliary ducts was achieved in 45 of the 47 patients (95.7%). Mean time for biliary tract structures visual identification was 8 minutes and 40 seconds (± 7 minutes, 20 seconds), fluorescence allowed the visualization of biliary tract anatomical variants in two patients.
Discussion: The reported rate of biliary structures visualization using ICG is relatively variable, ranging from 25% to 100%, in our group it was 95.7% due to our protocol.
Conclusions: ICG utilization for cholecystectomy is very useful and helps for a safe procedure even in difficult surgeries, we believe that it should be used in everyday practice.
{"title":"Fluorescence Guided Cholecystectomy by a Single Group: Initial 47 Procedures Experience in Mexico.","authors":"Ariel de Jesus Martinez-Onate, Alan de Jesus Martinez-Salas, Vania Cazares-Garcia","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) for biliary surgery uses indocyanine green (ICG), a specific dye that is eliminated almost exclusively by the liver and biliary system, making it very useful for an adequate and safe visualization of biliary tract structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present our experience with FGS for cholecystectomy multiport and single port, including all patients older than 18 years of age, with diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute and chronic), from October 18, 2018 to December 30, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were managed with FGS cholecystectomy, mean age was 61.2 (± 17.7) years, 31 (65.9%) were female and 16 (34.1%) males. Twenty-four (51.1%) were emergency procedures, due to acute cholecystitis, of which 10 (41.7%) presented with an infected gallbladder (Parkland 3 to 5) and three (12.5%) presented with related acute pancreatitis, the remaining 23 (48.9%) cases were elective surgeries, due to chronic cholecystitis. Visualization of laparoscopic fluorescence of the biliary ducts was achieved in 45 of the 47 patients (95.7%). Mean time for biliary tract structures visual identification was 8 minutes and 40 seconds (± 7 minutes, 20 seconds), fluorescence allowed the visualization of biliary tract anatomical variants in two patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reported rate of biliary structures visualization using ICG is relatively variable, ranging from 25% to 100%, in our group it was 95.7% due to our protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG utilization for cholecystectomy is very useful and helps for a safe procedure even in difficult surgeries, we believe that it should be used in everyday practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439283/pdf/e2022.00043.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mevlana Derya Balbay, Ersin Köseoğlu, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Arif Özkan, Mert Kılıç, Murat Can Kiremit, Ahmet Musaoğlu, Kayhan Tarım, Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya
Background and objectives: Robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion is a technically complicated, time-consuming procedure. The aim of this study was to present the operative, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endopelvic fascia sparing (EPFS) RARC with intracorporeal Studer pouch formation. To the best of our knowledge, this is first series in the literature that includes EPFS RARC.
Methods: Between October 1, 2019 and April 30, 2022, 10 bladder cancer patients underwent EPFS RARC, bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection with intracorporeal Studer pouch reconstruction with Balbay's technique. Patient demographics, operative, and post-operative parameters were recorded.
Results: Among 10 patients, 8 were male and 2 were female. Mean operative time, median estimated blood loss, and median duration of hospital stay was 530 minutes, 316 ml, and 8 days, respectively. One month postoperatively, the mean maximum flow, average flow rate, mean voided, and post-voided urine volume were 20.2 ml/sec, 4.4 ml/sec, 273.6 ml, and 3.5 ml, respectively. All of the patients were fully continent during day-time, three had mild night-time incontinence requiring pad use (both patients 1 pad per night). During a mean 11.5 months of follow up, zero patients died. One patient with a pathological, stage 4 tumor, had nodal recurrence at six months postoperatively. No distant metastasis were detected.
Conclusion: Endopelvic fascia sparing RARC has very promising early functional results with safe oncological outcomes and low complication rates.
{"title":"Endopelvic Fascia Sparing Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Studer Pouch with Balbay's Technique.","authors":"Mevlana Derya Balbay, Ersin Köseoğlu, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Arif Özkan, Mert Kılıç, Murat Can Kiremit, Ahmet Musaoğlu, Kayhan Tarım, Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion is a technically complicated, time-consuming procedure. The aim of this study was to present the operative, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endopelvic fascia sparing (EPFS) RARC with intracorporeal Studer pouch formation. To the best of our knowledge, this is first series in the literature that includes EPFS RARC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 1, 2019 and April 30, 2022, 10 bladder cancer patients underwent EPFS RARC, bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection with intracorporeal Studer pouch reconstruction with Balbay's technique. Patient demographics, operative, and post-operative parameters were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 patients, 8 were male and 2 were female. Mean operative time, median estimated blood loss, and median duration of hospital stay was 530 minutes, 316 ml, and 8 days, respectively. One month postoperatively, the mean maximum flow, average flow rate, mean voided, and post-voided urine volume were 20.2 ml/sec, 4.4 ml/sec, 273.6 ml, and 3.5 ml, respectively. All of the patients were fully continent during day-time, three had mild night-time incontinence requiring pad use (both patients 1 pad per night). During a mean 11.5 months of follow up, zero patients died. One patient with a pathological, stage 4 tumor, had nodal recurrence at six months postoperatively. No distant metastasis were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endopelvic fascia sparing RARC has very promising early functional results with safe oncological outcomes and low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355793/pdf/e2022.00031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40615111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David A Santos, Liangliang Zhang, Angela R Limmer, Heather M Gibson, Caleb Minetree, Stacia H Gollihar, Jenilette V Cristo, Celia R Ledet, Hop S Tran Cao
Background: The expansion of robotic surgery requires identifying factors of competent robotic bedside assisting. Surgical trainees desire more robotic console time, and we hypothesized that protocolized robotic surgery bedside training could equip Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) to meet this growing need. No standardized precedent exists for training APPs.
Methods: We designed a pilot study consisting of didactic and clinical skills. APPs completed didactic tests followed by proctored clinical skills checklists intraoperatively. Operating surgeons scored trainees with 10-point Likert scale (< 5 not confident, > 5 = confident). APPs scoring > 5 advanced to a solo practicum. Competence was defined as: didactic test score > 75th percentile, completing < 5 checklists, scoring > 5 on the practicum. The probability of passing the practicum was calculated with Bayes theorem.
Results: Of 10 APP trainees, 5 passed on initial attempt. After individualized development plans, 4 passed retesting. Differences in trainee factors were not statistically significant, but the probability of passing the practicum was < 50% if more than four checklists were needed.
Conclusions: Clinical experience, not didactic knowledge, determines the probability of intraoperative competence. Increasing clinical proctoring did not result in higher probability of competence. Early identification of APPs needing individualized improvement increases the proportion of competent APPs.
{"title":"Protocolized Training of Advanced Practice Providers for Robotic Surgery Improves the Quality of Intraoperative Assistance.","authors":"David A Santos, Liangliang Zhang, Angela R Limmer, Heather M Gibson, Caleb Minetree, Stacia H Gollihar, Jenilette V Cristo, Celia R Ledet, Hop S Tran Cao","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expansion of robotic surgery requires identifying factors of competent robotic bedside assisting. Surgical trainees desire more robotic console time, and we hypothesized that protocolized robotic surgery bedside training could equip Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) to meet this growing need. No standardized precedent exists for training APPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a pilot study consisting of didactic and clinical skills. APPs completed didactic tests followed by proctored clinical skills checklists intraoperatively. Operating surgeons scored trainees with 10-point Likert scale (< 5 not confident, > 5 = confident). APPs scoring > 5 advanced to a solo practicum. Competence was defined as: didactic test score > 75<sup>th</sup> percentile, completing < 5 checklists, scoring > 5 on the practicum. The probability of passing the practicum was calculated with Bayes theorem.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 APP trainees, 5 passed on initial attempt. After individualized development plans, 4 passed retesting. Differences in trainee factors were not statistically significant, but the probability of passing the practicum was < 50% if more than four checklists were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical experience, not didactic knowledge, determines the probability of intraoperative competence. Increasing clinical proctoring did not result in higher probability of competence. Early identification of APPs needing individualized improvement increases the proportion of competent APPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/b9/e2022.00024.PMC9355795.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40709782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexis L Cralley, Clay C Burlew, Charles J Fox, Fredric M Pieracci, K Barry K Platnick, Eric M Campion, Mitchell J Cohen, Ernest E Moore, Ryan A Lawless
Introduction: Many patients utilize the Emergency Room (ER) for primary care, resulting in overburdened ERs, strained resources, and delays in care. To combat this, many centers have adopted a Trauma/Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service providing specialty surgeons whose primary work is the unencumbered surgical availability to emergency surgery patients. To evaluate our programs' efficacy, we investigated cholecystectomies as a common urgent procedure representative of services provided. We hypothesized that the adoption of a TACS service would result in improved access to care as evidence by decreased ER visits prior to cholecystectomy, improved time to cholecystectomy, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).
Methods: All patients that underwent urgent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. The unencumbered TACS surgeon was implemented on July 1, 2018. Prior ER visits involving biliary symptoms, time from admission to cholecystectomy, and hospital LOS were compared.
Results: Of the 322 urgent cholecystectomies over the study period, 165 were performed prior and 157 following adoption of the TACS structure. The average number of ER visits for biliary symptoms prior to cholecystectomy decreased from 1.4 to 1.2 (p = 0.01). Time from admission to cholecystectomy was 28.3 hours and 27.3 hours respectively (p = 0.74). Average LOS decreased following the restructure (3.1 vs 2.5 days; p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Implementation of an unencumbered TACS surgeon managing urgent surgical disease improves access to and delivery of surgical services for cholecystectomy patients in a safety net, level one trauma center. Further research is necessary to determine potential improvements in hospital cost and patient satisfaction.
许多患者利用急诊室(ER)进行初级保健,导致急诊室负担过重,资源紧张,护理延误。为了解决这个问题,许多中心采用了创伤/急性护理外科(TACS)服务,提供专业外科医生,其主要工作是为急诊手术患者提供无阻碍的手术。为了评估我们的方案的效果,我们调查了胆囊切除术作为提供服务的常见紧急程序的代表。我们假设采用TACS服务可以减少胆囊切除术前急诊室就诊次数、缩短胆囊切除术时间和缩短住院时间(LOS),从而改善获得护理的机会。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月1日至12月31日所有急诊胆囊切除术患者的资料。无阻碍的TACS外科医生于2018年7月1日实施。研究人员比较了先前就诊的胆道症状、从入院到胆囊切除术的时间和医院LOS。结果:在研究期间的322例紧急胆囊切除术中,165例在采用TACS结构之前进行,157例在采用TACS结构之后进行。胆囊切除术前因胆道症状就诊的平均次数从1.4次降至1.2次(p = 0.01)。入院至胆囊切除术时间分别为28.3 h和27.3 h (p = 0.74)。重建后平均LOS下降(3.1 vs 2.5天;P = 0.03)。结论:实施无阻碍的TACS外科医生管理紧急外科疾病,提高了一级创伤中心安全网络中胆囊切除术患者获得和提供手术服务的机会。需要进一步的研究来确定医院成本和患者满意度的潜在改善。
{"title":"An Unencumbered Acute Care Surgeon Improves Delivery of Emergent Surgical Care for Cholecystectomy Patients.","authors":"Alexis L Cralley, Clay C Burlew, Charles J Fox, Fredric M Pieracci, K Barry K Platnick, Eric M Campion, Mitchell J Cohen, Ernest E Moore, Ryan A Lawless","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients utilize the Emergency Room (ER) for primary care, resulting in overburdened ERs, strained resources, and delays in care. To combat this, many centers have adopted a Trauma/Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service providing specialty surgeons whose primary work is the unencumbered surgical availability to emergency surgery patients. To evaluate our programs' efficacy, we investigated cholecystectomies as a common urgent procedure representative of services provided. We hypothesized that the adoption of a TACS service would result in improved access to care as evidence by decreased ER visits prior to cholecystectomy, improved time to cholecystectomy, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients that underwent urgent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. The unencumbered TACS surgeon was implemented on July 1, 2018. Prior ER visits involving biliary symptoms, time from admission to cholecystectomy, and hospital LOS were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 322 urgent cholecystectomies over the study period, 165 were performed prior and 157 following adoption of the TACS structure. The average number of ER visits for biliary symptoms prior to cholecystectomy decreased from 1.4 to 1.2 (p = 0.01). Time from admission to cholecystectomy was 28.3 hours and 27.3 hours respectively (p = 0.74). Average LOS decreased following the restructure (3.1 vs 2.5 days; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an unencumbered TACS surgeon managing urgent surgical disease improves access to and delivery of surgical services for cholecystectomy patients in a safety net, level one trauma center. Further research is necessary to determine potential improvements in hospital cost and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/a3/e2022.00045.PMC9521635.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33497145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}