首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Decreasing Surgical Site Infection Associated with the Use of Circular Staplers During Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass. Roux-En-Y胃旁路术中使用圆形吻合器减少手术部位感染。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00056
Ana T Garcia Cabrera, Gustavo Romero-Velez, Xavier Pereira, Joseph T Vazzana, Diego R Camacho

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been established as a leading treatment of obesity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain the most common complication.

Objective: To compare the incidence of SSIs before and after the implementation of our technique.

Methods: Our intraoperative technique limits enteric contact with the abdominal wall through a wound protector at the end-to-end anastomosis stapler port site, with enteric retrieval with a specimen bag followed by betadine irrigation. We analyzed our SSIs outcomes before and after implementation of our technique in all RYGB and laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversions at our institution performed by two providers between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We compared patient age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The χ2, Fischer exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests, and multivariate analysis were performed.

Results: Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent LRYGB and sleeve-to-bypass conversion during the two study periods. Group 1 (162 patients, 37.76%) all underwent RYGB. Group 2 (267 patients, 62.24%) of whom 199 underwent RYGB and 68 underwent a laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversion. The SSI rate was 9.26% in Group 1 and 2.62% in Group 2 (p = 0.002514). Statistical significance was also noted for operating room time (137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02) and hospital length of stay (2 - 3 interquartile range vs 1 - 2 interquartile range, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: We propose a safe, reproducible technique that significantly reduces SSI rates during LRYGB.

背景:腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)已被确立为肥胖症的主要治疗方法。手术部位感染(ssi)仍然是最常见的并发症。目的:比较手术前后ssi的发生率。方法:我们的术中技术通过端到端吻合器端口处的伤口保护器限制肠内与腹壁的接触,并用标本袋肠内取出,然后用倍他定冲洗。我们分析了在2009年1月1日至2011年12月31日和2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间由两名提供者在我院进行的所有RYGB和腹腔镜套管转旁路手术中实施我们技术前后的ssi结果。我们比较患者年龄、性别、体质指数、美国麻醉医师学会分级;合并症包括高血压,糖尿病和高脂血症。进行χ2、Fischer精确检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和多变量分析。结果:429例患者在两个研究期间接受了LRYGB和套管转桥术。组1(162例,37.76%)均行RYGB。第2组(267例,62.24%),其中199例行RYGB, 68例行腹腔镜套管-旁路转换。SSI发生率1组为9.26%,2组为2.62% (p = 0.002514)。手术时间(137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02)和住院时间(2 - 3四分位数范围vs 1 - 2四分位数范围,p = 0.04)也有统计学意义。结论:我们提出了一种安全、可重复的技术,可以显著降低LRYGB期间的SSI发生率。
{"title":"Decreasing Surgical Site Infection Associated with the Use of Circular Staplers During Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Ana T Garcia Cabrera,&nbsp;Gustavo Romero-Velez,&nbsp;Xavier Pereira,&nbsp;Joseph T Vazzana,&nbsp;Diego R Camacho","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been established as a leading treatment of obesity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of SSIs before and after the implementation of our technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our intraoperative technique limits enteric contact with the abdominal wall through a wound protector at the end-to-end anastomosis stapler port site, with enteric retrieval with a specimen bag followed by betadine irrigation. We analyzed our SSIs outcomes before and after implementation of our technique in all RYGB and laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversions at our institution performed by two providers between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We compared patient age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The χ<sup>2</sup>, Fischer exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests, and multivariate analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent LRYGB and sleeve-to-bypass conversion during the two study periods. Group 1 (162 patients, 37.76%) all underwent RYGB. Group 2 (267 patients, 62.24%) of whom 199 underwent RYGB and 68 underwent a laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversion. The SSI rate was 9.26% in Group 1 and 2.62% in Group 2 (p = 0.002514). Statistical significance was also noted for operating room time (137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02) and hospital length of stay (2 - 3 interquartile range vs 1 - 2 interquartile range, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose a safe, reproducible technique that significantly reduces SSI rates during LRYGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/09/e2022.00056.PMC9840216.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Clean Sweep: Initial Experience with a Novel Intracavity Laparoscopic Cleaning Device. 清洁扫描:一种新型腔内腹腔镜清洁装置的初步经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00066
Simin Golestani, Charles Hill, Jawad Ali, Christopher Idelson, Christopher Rylander, John Uecker

Background: A frequently encountered problem in laparoscopic surgery is an impaired visual field. The Novel Intracavitary Laparoscopic Cleaning Device (NILCD) is designed to adequately clean a laparoscopic lens quickly and efficiently without requiring removal from the surgical cavity. Animal and cadaver studies showed good efficacy and a short learning curve. This study aims to describe the efficacy and initial human experience with the device during laparoscopic operations.

Methods: Since 2020, NILCD was used in 167 cases with surgeons at 12 different institutions in Texas, California, and Massachusetts. The rate of scope removal in each case was examined. Following each trial, users were asked to rank the NILCD on ease of set up, insertion, adjustment, and cleaning efficacy. A survey was then used to evaluate surgeon satisfaction.

Results: The NILCD was tested in a variety of cases, including colorectal, gynecological, general, pediatric, hepatobiliary, thoracic, bariatric and foregut surgery. NILCD usage eliminated the need for scope removal in 90.14% of debris events, with only 97 removals in 984 events. Eighty-six percent of users reported that the NILCD improved their visual field. When asked to rate specific qualities of the device using a 5-point Likert scale, surgeons gave an average score of 4.56 for ease of setup, 4.10 for ease of insertion, and 4.12 for ease of adjusting and cleaning efficacy.

Conclusion: In an initial analysis of 167 cases, the NILCD proved to be an effective and convenient method of cleaning the laparoscopic lens in-vivo. It was associated with good surgeon satisfaction.

背景:腹腔镜手术中经常遇到的问题是视野受损。新型腔内腹腔镜清洁装置(NILCD)旨在快速有效地充分清洁腹腔镜晶状体,而无需从手术腔中取出。动物和尸体研究显示出良好的疗效和较短的学习曲线。本研究旨在描述在腹腔镜手术中使用该设备的效果和初步人类体验。方法:自2020年以来,NILCD在德克萨斯州、加利福尼亚州和马萨诸塞州的12家不同机构的167例外科医生中使用。检查每个病例的范围切除率。在每次试验之后,用户被要求对NILCD的设置、插入、调整和清洁效果进行排序。然后进行一项调查来评估外科医生的满意度。结果:NILCD在各种病例中进行了测试,包括结直肠、妇科、普通、儿科、肝胆、胸部、减肥和前肠手术。在90.14%的碎片事件中,NILCD的使用消除了移除作用域的需要,在984个事件中仅移除97个作用域。86%的用户报告说NILCD改善了他们的视野。当被要求使用5分李克特量表对器械的具体质量进行评分时,外科医生在安装的容易程度上给出了4.56分,在插入的容易程度上给出了4.10分,在调整和清洁的容易程度上给出了4.12分。结论:在167例病例的初步分析中,NILCD被证明是一种有效且方便的体外清洁腹腔镜晶状体的方法。这与良好的外科医生满意度有关。
{"title":"A Clean Sweep: Initial Experience with a Novel Intracavity Laparoscopic Cleaning Device.","authors":"Simin Golestani,&nbsp;Charles Hill,&nbsp;Jawad Ali,&nbsp;Christopher Idelson,&nbsp;Christopher Rylander,&nbsp;John Uecker","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A frequently encountered problem in laparoscopic surgery is an impaired visual field. The Novel Intracavitary Laparoscopic Cleaning Device (NILCD) is designed to adequately clean a laparoscopic lens quickly and efficiently without requiring removal from the surgical cavity. Animal and cadaver studies showed good efficacy and a short learning curve. This study aims to describe the efficacy and initial human experience with the device during laparoscopic operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Since 2020, NILCD was used in 167 cases with surgeons at 12 different institutions in Texas, California, and Massachusetts. The rate of scope removal in each case was examined. Following each trial, users were asked to rank the NILCD on ease of set up, insertion, adjustment, and cleaning efficacy. A survey was then used to evaluate surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NILCD was tested in a variety of cases, including colorectal, gynecological, general, pediatric, hepatobiliary, thoracic, bariatric and foregut surgery. NILCD usage eliminated the need for scope removal in 90.14% of debris events, with only 97 removals in 984 events. Eighty-six percent of users reported that the NILCD improved their visual field. When asked to rate specific qualities of the device using a 5-point Likert scale, surgeons gave an average score of 4.56 for ease of setup, 4.10 for ease of insertion, and 4.12 for ease of adjusting and cleaning efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an initial analysis of 167 cases, the NILCD proved to be an effective and convenient method of cleaning the laparoscopic lens in-vivo. It was associated with good surgeon satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/e4/e2022.00066.PMC9840218.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10599938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Experience of Pure Robotic Right Hepatectomy for Liver Donors in a Small-Volume Center. 小容量中心供肝者纯机器人右肝切除术的早期经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00063
Eun Jeong Jang, Kwan Woo Kim, Sung Hwa Kang

Background and objectives: Living donor right hepatectomy has become the most common method of liver transplantation. With minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy became possible, but with some limitations. Advancements in robotic technology made it possible to overcome these shortcomings and maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in transplantation. For this reason, some centers have started robotic donor hepatectomy. Our study aimed to introduce our early experience of robotic donor right hepatectomy and investigate the feasibility of this surgery.

Methods: This study included 10 (30%) living donors who underwent pure robotic donor right hepatectomy at Dong-A University Hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The medical records were analyzed to determine the short-term outcomes of these patients.

Results: The total operation time and warm ischemic time were 396.6 min ± 62.7 min and 19.7 min± 5.6 min, respectively. Moreover, there was no transfusion during the operation and no other port use and open conversion. The average real graft volume was 590 mL ± 73.5 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 8.7 d ± 2.6 d. There have been no specific complications noted in the donor group.

Conclusions: Based on our positive experience with pure robotic right hepatectomy for a liver donor, the robotic technique may be a new option for achieving minimally invasive surgery for a liver donor.

背景与目的:活体右肝切除术已成为肝移植最常用的方法。微创手术使腹腔镜供肝切除术成为可能,但仍有一些局限性。机器人技术的进步使克服这些缺点成为可能,并最大限度地发挥微创移植手术的优势。出于这个原因,一些中心已经开始了机器人供肝切除术。我们的研究旨在介绍我们的早期经验,机器人供体右肝切除术和探讨这种手术的可行性。方法:本研究纳入了2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日在东亚大学医院接受纯机器人供体右肝切除术的10例活体供体(30%)。对医疗记录进行分析,以确定这些患者的短期预后。结果:总手术时间396.6 min±62.7 min,热缺血时间19.7 min±5.6 min。术中无输血,无其他端口使用和开放转换。平均移植体积为590 mL±73.5 mL,平均住院时间为8.7 d±2.6 d。在供体组中没有特别的并发症。结论:基于我们对肝脏供者的纯机器人右肝切除术的积极经验,机器人技术可能是实现肝脏供者微创手术的新选择。
{"title":"Early Experience of Pure Robotic Right Hepatectomy for Liver Donors in a Small-Volume Center.","authors":"Eun Jeong Jang,&nbsp;Kwan Woo Kim,&nbsp;Sung Hwa Kang","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Living donor right hepatectomy has become the most common method of liver transplantation. With minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy became possible, but with some limitations. Advancements in robotic technology made it possible to overcome these shortcomings and maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in transplantation. For this reason, some centers have started robotic donor hepatectomy. Our study aimed to introduce our early experience of robotic donor right hepatectomy and investigate the feasibility of this surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 10 (30%) living donors who underwent pure robotic donor right hepatectomy at Dong-A University Hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The medical records were analyzed to determine the short-term outcomes of these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total operation time and warm ischemic time were 396.6 min ± 62.7 min and 19.7 min± 5.6 min, respectively. Moreover, there was no transfusion during the operation and no other port use and open conversion. The average real graft volume was 590 mL ± 73.5 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 8.7 d ± 2.6 d. There have been no specific complications noted in the donor group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our positive experience with pure robotic right hepatectomy for a liver donor, the robotic technique may be a new option for achieving minimally invasive surgery for a liver donor.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/81/e2022.00063.PMC9726171.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10530073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient? 食管胃交界流出梗阻和食管裂孔疝:仅靠疝修补就足够了吗?
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051
Colin G DeLong, Alexander T Liu, Matthew D Taylor, Jerome R Lyn-Sue, Joshua S Winder, Eric M Pauli, Randy S Haluck

Introduction: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is attributed to primary/idiopathic causes or secondary/mechanical causes, including hiatal hernias (HH). While patients with HH and EGJOO (HH+EGJOO) may undergo HH repair without myotomy, it is unclear if an underlying motility disorder is missed by therapy which addresses only the secondary EGJOO cause. The goal of this study was to determine if HH repair alone is sufficient management for HH+EGJOO patients.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent HH repair between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2020 was performed. Patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM) within one year before HH repair were included. Patients with and without EGJOO on pre-operative HREM were compared.

Results: Sixty-three patients were identified. Pre-operative HREM findings included: 43 (68.3%) normal, 13 (20.6%) EGJOO, 4 (6.3%) minor disorder or peristalsis, 2 (3.2%) achalasia, and 1 (1.6%) major disorder of peristalsis. No differences between patients with EGJOO or normal findings on pre-operative manometry were found in pre-operative demographics/risk factors, pre-operative symptoms, and pre-operative HREM, except higher integrated relaxation pressure in EGJOO patients. No differences were noted in length of stay, 30-day complications, long-term persistent symptoms, or recurrence with mean follow-up of 26-months. Of the 3 (23.1%) EGJOO patients with persistent symptoms, 2 underwent HREM demonstrating persistent EGJOO and none required endoscopic/surgical myotomy.

Conclusion: Most HH+EGJOO patients experienced symptom resolution following HH repair alone and none required additional intervention to address a missed primary motility disorder. Further study is required to determine optimal management of patients with persistent EGJOO following HH repair.

食管胃交界流出梗阻(EGJOO)可归因于原发性/特发性原因或继发性/机械性原因,包括裂孔疝(HH)。虽然HH和EGJOO (HH+EGJOO)患者可以接受HH修复而不进行肌切开术,但目前尚不清楚仅针对继发性EGJOO原因的治疗是否遗漏了潜在的运动障碍。本研究的目的是确定单独的HH修复是否足以治疗HH+EGJOO患者。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月1日至2020年1月31日期间接受HH修复的患者。患者在HH修复前一年内接受高分辨率食管测压(HREM)。比较术前有EGJOO和无EGJOO患者的HREM。结果:共发现63例患者。术前HREM发现:43例(68.3%)正常,13例(20.6%)EGJOO, 4例(6.3%)轻微蠕动障碍,2例(3.2%)失弛缓症,1例(1.6%)严重蠕动障碍。在术前人口统计学/危险因素、术前症状和术前HREM方面,EGJOO患者与术前血压测量正常的患者之间没有差异,但EGJOO患者的综合松弛压较高。住院时间、30天并发症、长期持续症状或平均随访26个月的复发率均无差异。在3例(23.1%)持续症状的EGJOO患者中,2例进行了HREM,显示持续的EGJOO,没有人需要内窥镜/手术肌切开术。结论:大多数HH+EGJOO患者在单独的HH修复后症状得到缓解,没有人需要额外的干预来解决遗漏的原发性运动障碍。需要进一步的研究来确定HH修复后持续性EGJOO患者的最佳处理方法。
{"title":"Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction and Hiatal Hernia: Is Hernia Repair Alone Sufficient?","authors":"Colin G DeLong,&nbsp;Alexander T Liu,&nbsp;Matthew D Taylor,&nbsp;Jerome R Lyn-Sue,&nbsp;Joshua S Winder,&nbsp;Eric M Pauli,&nbsp;Randy S Haluck","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is attributed to primary/idiopathic causes or secondary/mechanical causes, including hiatal hernias (HH). While patients with HH and EGJOO (HH+EGJOO) may undergo HH repair without myotomy, it is unclear if an underlying motility disorder is missed by therapy which addresses only the secondary EGJOO cause. The goal of this study was to determine if HH repair alone is sufficient management for HH+EGJOO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent HH repair between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2020 was performed. Patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM) within one year before HH repair were included. Patients with and without EGJOO on pre-operative HREM were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were identified. Pre-operative HREM findings included: 43 (68.3%) normal, 13 (20.6%) EGJOO, 4 (6.3%) minor disorder or peristalsis, 2 (3.2%) achalasia, and 1 (1.6%) major disorder of peristalsis. No differences between patients with EGJOO or normal findings on pre-operative manometry were found in pre-operative demographics/risk factors, pre-operative symptoms, and pre-operative HREM, except higher integrated relaxation pressure in EGJOO patients. No differences were noted in length of stay, 30-day complications, long-term persistent symptoms, or recurrence with mean follow-up of 26-months. Of the 3 (23.1%) EGJOO patients with persistent symptoms, 2 underwent HREM demonstrating persistent EGJOO and none required endoscopic/surgical myotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most HH+EGJOO patients experienced symptom resolution following HH repair alone and none required additional intervention to address a missed primary motility disorder. Further study is required to determine optimal management of patients with persistent EGJOO following HH repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/e8/e2022.00051.PMC9673993.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9512132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. 微创妇科手术成本优化策略。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015
Youssef Youssef, Huda Afaneh, Mostafa A Borahay

Background: Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care.

Database: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles.

Discussion: Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

背景:成本和质量是重要的、复杂的、相互交织的手术结果。有证据表明,主要的成本驱动因素包括手术室时间、住院时间、再入院、手术并发症以及术前和手术护理的质量。我们的实践决定了妇科手术的成本和质量。在这篇综述文章中探讨了各种因素,以提出和确定实施具有成本效益的变革的方法,同时也提高了患者护理质量。数据库:检索MEDLINE和PubMed数据库查找相关文章。讨论:临床偏好和决定,外科医生的经验,培训生的教育,和防御医学可以影响成本。此外,不一致的医管关系可能会影响整个医疗保健系统的决策。微创手术的加速应用,尤其是机器人手术,既带来了机遇,也带来了挑战。改善结果、患者满意度和降低成本的一个例子是术前优化、术后恢复增强和门诊子宫切除术的日益普及。识别成本驱动因素并寻找改进策略将在降低微创妇科手术成本的同时提高质量和患者预后。
{"title":"Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Youssef Youssef,&nbsp;Huda Afaneh,&nbsp;Mostafa A Borahay","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Database: </strong>We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/7f/e2022.00015.PMC9385110.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. 子宫肌瘤微创手术中组织提取方法的研究进展。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
Renita Kim, Kristen Pepin, Monalisa Dmello, Nisse Clark, Mobolaji Ajao, Jon Einarsson, Sarah Cohen Rassier

Background and objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.

Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.

Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.

背景和目的:自2014年美国食品和药物管理局关于使用动力粉碎的沟通以来,妇科医生采用了替代的组织提取策略。本研究的目的是探讨目前妇科外科医生在微创子宫切除术或子宫肌瘤切除术后组织提取的技术。方法:于2019年3月26日至2019年4月17日对AAGL所有会员进行在线调查,收集回复。结果:436名受访者完成了调查。对于子宫切除术,最常见的组织提取方法是经阴道切开手工碎块(72.4%)或小切口(66.9%)。近三分之一(31.7%)的人支持使用功率粉碎。对于子宫肌瘤切除术,经小切口手工分碎术(71.9%)是最常见的方法,其次是强力分碎术(35.7%)。使用密封袋是很常见的。小开腹切口通常为3厘米,最常位于脐部。发现了地理差异,特别是功率分块。在子宫切除术中,18.4%的美国外科医生报告使用了它,而非美国外科医生的比例为56.9%。在子宫肌瘤切除术中,20.5%的美国外科医生报告使用它,而国际同行的比例为67.5%。年龄、实习年数、实习地点均与动力碎裂机的使用显著相关。结论:绝大多数从业人员通过阴道切开术或小切口切开术进行手工碎裂。使用密封袋是常见的所有组织移除方法。与其他国家相比,电力粉碎的使用在美国不太常见。
{"title":"Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.","authors":"Renita Kim,&nbsp;Kristen Pepin,&nbsp;Monalisa Dmello,&nbsp;Nisse Clark,&nbsp;Mobolaji Ajao,&nbsp;Jon Einarsson,&nbsp;Sarah Cohen Rassier","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f9/fe/e2022.00036.PMC9385112.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fluorescence Guided Cholecystectomy by a Single Group: Initial 47 Procedures Experience in Mexico. 单组荧光引导胆囊切除术:墨西哥最初的47例手术经验
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00043
Ariel de Jesus Martinez-Onate, Alan de Jesus Martinez-Salas, Vania Cazares-Garcia

Introduction: Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) for biliary surgery uses indocyanine green (ICG), a specific dye that is eliminated almost exclusively by the liver and biliary system, making it very useful for an adequate and safe visualization of biliary tract structures.

Methods: We present our experience with FGS for cholecystectomy multiport and single port, including all patients older than 18 years of age, with diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute and chronic), from October 18, 2018 to December 30, 2021.

Results: A total of 47 patients were managed with FGS cholecystectomy, mean age was 61.2 (± 17.7) years, 31 (65.9%) were female and 16 (34.1%) males. Twenty-four (51.1%) were emergency procedures, due to acute cholecystitis, of which 10 (41.7%) presented with an infected gallbladder (Parkland 3 to 5) and three (12.5%) presented with related acute pancreatitis, the remaining 23 (48.9%) cases were elective surgeries, due to chronic cholecystitis. Visualization of laparoscopic fluorescence of the biliary ducts was achieved in 45 of the 47 patients (95.7%). Mean time for biliary tract structures visual identification was 8 minutes and 40 seconds (± 7 minutes, 20 seconds), fluorescence allowed the visualization of biliary tract anatomical variants in two patients.

Discussion: The reported rate of biliary structures visualization using ICG is relatively variable, ranging from 25% to 100%, in our group it was 95.7% due to our protocol.

Conclusions: ICG utilization for cholecystectomy is very useful and helps for a safe procedure even in difficult surgeries, we believe that it should be used in everyday practice.

简介:胆道手术的荧光引导手术(FGS)使用吲哚菁绿(ICG),这是一种几乎完全被肝脏和胆道系统消除的特定染料,使其对胆道结构的充分和安全的可视化非常有用。方法:我们介绍了我们在2018年10月18日至2021年12月30日期间,所有年龄大于18岁,诊断为胆囊炎(急性和慢性)的胆囊切除术中使用FGS的经验。结果:47例患者行FGS胆囊切除术,平均年龄61.2(±17.7)岁,其中女性31例(65.9%),男性16例(34.1%)。24例(51.1%)为急性胆囊炎急诊手术,其中10例(41.7%)为胆囊感染(Parkland 3 - 5), 3例(12.5%)为相关急性胰腺炎,其余23例(48.9%)为选择性手术,原因是慢性胆囊炎。47例患者中有45例(95.7%)实现了腹腔镜胆管荧光显示。胆道结构视觉识别的平均时间为8分40秒(±7分20秒),荧光显示两例胆道解剖变异。讨论:使用ICG显示胆道结构的报告率是相对可变的,范围从25%到100%,在我们组中,由于我们的方案,它为95.7%。结论:ICG在胆囊切除术中的应用是非常有用的,即使在困难的手术中也有助于手术的安全,我们认为它应该在日常实践中使用。
{"title":"Fluorescence Guided Cholecystectomy by a Single Group: Initial 47 Procedures Experience in Mexico.","authors":"Ariel de Jesus Martinez-Onate,&nbsp;Alan de Jesus Martinez-Salas,&nbsp;Vania Cazares-Garcia","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) for biliary surgery uses indocyanine green (ICG), a specific dye that is eliminated almost exclusively by the liver and biliary system, making it very useful for an adequate and safe visualization of biliary tract structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present our experience with FGS for cholecystectomy multiport and single port, including all patients older than 18 years of age, with diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute and chronic), from October 18, 2018 to December 30, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were managed with FGS cholecystectomy, mean age was 61.2 (± 17.7) years, 31 (65.9%) were female and 16 (34.1%) males. Twenty-four (51.1%) were emergency procedures, due to acute cholecystitis, of which 10 (41.7%) presented with an infected gallbladder (Parkland 3 to 5) and three (12.5%) presented with related acute pancreatitis, the remaining 23 (48.9%) cases were elective surgeries, due to chronic cholecystitis. Visualization of laparoscopic fluorescence of the biliary ducts was achieved in 45 of the 47 patients (95.7%). Mean time for biliary tract structures visual identification was 8 minutes and 40 seconds (± 7 minutes, 20 seconds), fluorescence allowed the visualization of biliary tract anatomical variants in two patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reported rate of biliary structures visualization using ICG is relatively variable, ranging from 25% to 100%, in our group it was 95.7% due to our protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG utilization for cholecystectomy is very useful and helps for a safe procedure even in difficult surgeries, we believe that it should be used in everyday practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439283/pdf/e2022.00043.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endopelvic Fascia Sparing Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Studer Pouch with Balbay's Technique. Balbay技术保留骨盆内筋膜的机器人根治性膀胱切除术。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00031
Mevlana Derya Balbay, Ersin Köseoğlu, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Arif Özkan, Mert Kılıç, Murat Can Kiremit, Ahmet Musaoğlu, Kayhan Tarım, Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya

Background and objectives: Robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion is a technically complicated, time-consuming procedure. The aim of this study was to present the operative, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endopelvic fascia sparing (EPFS) RARC with intracorporeal Studer pouch formation. To the best of our knowledge, this is first series in the literature that includes EPFS RARC.

Methods: Between October 1, 2019 and April 30, 2022, 10 bladder cancer patients underwent EPFS RARC, bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection with intracorporeal Studer pouch reconstruction with Balbay's technique. Patient demographics, operative, and post-operative parameters were recorded.

Results: Among 10 patients, 8 were male and 2 were female. Mean operative time, median estimated blood loss, and median duration of hospital stay was 530 minutes, 316 ml, and 8 days, respectively. One month postoperatively, the mean maximum flow, average flow rate, mean voided, and post-voided urine volume were 20.2 ml/sec, 4.4 ml/sec, 273.6 ml, and 3.5 ml, respectively. All of the patients were fully continent during day-time, three had mild night-time incontinence requiring pad use (both patients 1 pad per night). During a mean 11.5 months of follow up, zero patients died. One patient with a pathological, stage 4 tumor, had nodal recurrence at six months postoperatively. No distant metastasis were detected.

Conclusion: Endopelvic fascia sparing RARC has very promising early functional results with safe oncological outcomes and low complication rates.

背景和目的:机器人根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)伴体内尿转移是一项技术复杂且耗时的手术。本研究的目的是介绍盆腔内筋膜保留(EPFS) RARC伴有体内Studer袋形成的患者的手术、病理、肿瘤和功能结果。据我们所知,这是文献中第一个包含EPFS RARC的系列。方法:2019年10月1日至2022年4月30日,10例膀胱癌患者行EPFS RARC、双侧扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫联合Balbay技术体外Studer袋重建术。记录患者人口统计、手术和术后参数。结果:10例患者中,男性8例,女性2例。平均手术时间、中位估计失血量和中位住院时间分别为530分钟、316毫升和8天。术后1个月,平均最大尿流量20.2 ml/秒,平均尿流量4.4 ml/秒,平均排尿量273.6 ml,排尿后尿量3.5 ml。所有患者白天完全尿失禁,3例有轻度尿失禁,需要使用尿垫(两例患者每晚1块尿垫)。在平均11.5个月的随访期间,零例患者死亡。1例病理性4期肿瘤患者术后6个月淋巴结复发。未发现远处转移。结论:保留盆腔筋膜的RARC具有良好的早期功能效果,肿瘤预后安全,并发症发生率低。
{"title":"Endopelvic Fascia Sparing Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Studer Pouch with Balbay's Technique.","authors":"Mevlana Derya Balbay,&nbsp;Ersin Köseoğlu,&nbsp;Abdullah Erdem Canda,&nbsp;Arif Özkan,&nbsp;Mert Kılıç,&nbsp;Murat Can Kiremit,&nbsp;Ahmet Musaoğlu,&nbsp;Kayhan Tarım,&nbsp;Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion is a technically complicated, time-consuming procedure. The aim of this study was to present the operative, pathological, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients who underwent endopelvic fascia sparing (EPFS) RARC with intracorporeal Studer pouch formation. To the best of our knowledge, this is first series in the literature that includes EPFS RARC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 1, 2019 and April 30, 2022, 10 bladder cancer patients underwent EPFS RARC, bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection with intracorporeal Studer pouch reconstruction with Balbay's technique. Patient demographics, operative, and post-operative parameters were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 patients, 8 were male and 2 were female. Mean operative time, median estimated blood loss, and median duration of hospital stay was 530 minutes, 316 ml, and 8 days, respectively. One month postoperatively, the mean maximum flow, average flow rate, mean voided, and post-voided urine volume were 20.2 ml/sec, 4.4 ml/sec, 273.6 ml, and 3.5 ml, respectively. All of the patients were fully continent during day-time, three had mild night-time incontinence requiring pad use (both patients 1 pad per night). During a mean 11.5 months of follow up, zero patients died. One patient with a pathological, stage 4 tumor, had nodal recurrence at six months postoperatively. No distant metastasis were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endopelvic fascia sparing RARC has very promising early functional results with safe oncological outcomes and low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355793/pdf/e2022.00031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40615111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Protocolized Training of Advanced Practice Providers for Robotic Surgery Improves the Quality of Intraoperative Assistance. 机器人手术高级实践提供者的协议培训提高了术中辅助的质量。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00024
David A Santos, Liangliang Zhang, Angela R Limmer, Heather M Gibson, Caleb Minetree, Stacia H Gollihar, Jenilette V Cristo, Celia R Ledet, Hop S Tran Cao

Background: The expansion of robotic surgery requires identifying factors of competent robotic bedside assisting. Surgical trainees desire more robotic console time, and we hypothesized that protocolized robotic surgery bedside training could equip Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) to meet this growing need. No standardized precedent exists for training APPs.

Methods: We designed a pilot study consisting of didactic and clinical skills. APPs completed didactic tests followed by proctored clinical skills checklists intraoperatively. Operating surgeons scored trainees with 10-point Likert scale (< 5 not confident, > 5 = confident). APPs scoring > 5 advanced to a solo practicum. Competence was defined as: didactic test score > 75th percentile, completing < 5 checklists, scoring > 5 on the practicum. The probability of passing the practicum was calculated with Bayes theorem.

Results: Of 10 APP trainees, 5 passed on initial attempt. After individualized development plans, 4 passed retesting. Differences in trainee factors were not statistically significant, but the probability of passing the practicum was < 50% if more than four checklists were needed.

Conclusions: Clinical experience, not didactic knowledge, determines the probability of intraoperative competence. Increasing clinical proctoring did not result in higher probability of competence. Early identification of APPs needing individualized improvement increases the proportion of competent APPs.

背景:机器人手术的扩展需要识别有能力的机器人床边辅助因素。外科受训者希望有更多的机器人控制台时间,我们假设,协议化的机器人手术床边培训可以使高级实践提供者(app)满足这一日益增长的需求。培训app没有标准化的先例。方法:我们设计了一个由教学和临床技能组成的试点研究。app完成了教学性测试,随后进行了术中临床技能检查。手术医师采用10分Likert量表对学员进行评分(< 5分不自信,> 5分自信)。app得分> 5分可进入单独实习。能力定义为:教学测试成绩> 75百分位,完成< 5个检查表,在实习中得分> 5。运用贝叶斯定理计算了实习通过的概率。结果:10名APP学员中,5人初试合格。经过个性化的开发方案,有4个通过了复测。学员因素的差异没有统计学意义,但如果需要超过四个检查表,通过实习的概率< 50%。结论:临床经验,而不是教学知识,决定了术中能力的可能性。增加临床监护并不能提高能力的可能性。早期识别需要个性化改进的应用程序可以增加有能力的应用程序的比例。
{"title":"Protocolized Training of Advanced Practice Providers for Robotic Surgery Improves the Quality of Intraoperative Assistance.","authors":"David A Santos,&nbsp;Liangliang Zhang,&nbsp;Angela R Limmer,&nbsp;Heather M Gibson,&nbsp;Caleb Minetree,&nbsp;Stacia H Gollihar,&nbsp;Jenilette V Cristo,&nbsp;Celia R Ledet,&nbsp;Hop S Tran Cao","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expansion of robotic surgery requires identifying factors of competent robotic bedside assisting. Surgical trainees desire more robotic console time, and we hypothesized that protocolized robotic surgery bedside training could equip Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) to meet this growing need. No standardized precedent exists for training APPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a pilot study consisting of didactic and clinical skills. APPs completed didactic tests followed by proctored clinical skills checklists intraoperatively. Operating surgeons scored trainees with 10-point Likert scale (< 5 not confident, > 5 = confident). APPs scoring > 5 advanced to a solo practicum. Competence was defined as: didactic test score > 75<sup>th</sup> percentile, completing < 5 checklists, scoring > 5 on the practicum. The probability of passing the practicum was calculated with Bayes theorem.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 APP trainees, 5 passed on initial attempt. After individualized development plans, 4 passed retesting. Differences in trainee factors were not statistically significant, but the probability of passing the practicum was < 50% if more than four checklists were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical experience, not didactic knowledge, determines the probability of intraoperative competence. Increasing clinical proctoring did not result in higher probability of competence. Early identification of APPs needing individualized improvement increases the proportion of competent APPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/b9/e2022.00024.PMC9355795.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40709782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Unencumbered Acute Care Surgeon Improves Delivery of Emergent Surgical Care for Cholecystectomy Patients. 无阻碍的急症护理外科医生提高了胆囊切除术患者急诊手术护理的交付。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00045
Alexis L Cralley, Clay C Burlew, Charles J Fox, Fredric M Pieracci, K Barry K Platnick, Eric M Campion, Mitchell J Cohen, Ernest E Moore, Ryan A Lawless

Introduction: Many patients utilize the Emergency Room (ER) for primary care, resulting in overburdened ERs, strained resources, and delays in care. To combat this, many centers have adopted a Trauma/Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service providing specialty surgeons whose primary work is the unencumbered surgical availability to emergency surgery patients. To evaluate our programs' efficacy, we investigated cholecystectomies as a common urgent procedure representative of services provided. We hypothesized that the adoption of a TACS service would result in improved access to care as evidence by decreased ER visits prior to cholecystectomy, improved time to cholecystectomy, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods: All patients that underwent urgent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. The unencumbered TACS surgeon was implemented on July 1, 2018. Prior ER visits involving biliary symptoms, time from admission to cholecystectomy, and hospital LOS were compared.

Results: Of the 322 urgent cholecystectomies over the study period, 165 were performed prior and 157 following adoption of the TACS structure. The average number of ER visits for biliary symptoms prior to cholecystectomy decreased from 1.4 to 1.2 (p = 0.01). Time from admission to cholecystectomy was 28.3 hours and 27.3 hours respectively (p = 0.74). Average LOS decreased following the restructure (3.1 vs 2.5 days; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Implementation of an unencumbered TACS surgeon managing urgent surgical disease improves access to and delivery of surgical services for cholecystectomy patients in a safety net, level one trauma center. Further research is necessary to determine potential improvements in hospital cost and patient satisfaction.

许多患者利用急诊室(ER)进行初级保健,导致急诊室负担过重,资源紧张,护理延误。为了解决这个问题,许多中心采用了创伤/急性护理外科(TACS)服务,提供专业外科医生,其主要工作是为急诊手术患者提供无阻碍的手术。为了评估我们的方案的效果,我们调查了胆囊切除术作为提供服务的常见紧急程序的代表。我们假设采用TACS服务可以减少胆囊切除术前急诊室就诊次数、缩短胆囊切除术时间和缩短住院时间(LOS),从而改善获得护理的机会。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月1日至12月31日所有急诊胆囊切除术患者的资料。无阻碍的TACS外科医生于2018年7月1日实施。研究人员比较了先前就诊的胆道症状、从入院到胆囊切除术的时间和医院LOS。结果:在研究期间的322例紧急胆囊切除术中,165例在采用TACS结构之前进行,157例在采用TACS结构之后进行。胆囊切除术前因胆道症状就诊的平均次数从1.4次降至1.2次(p = 0.01)。入院至胆囊切除术时间分别为28.3 h和27.3 h (p = 0.74)。重建后平均LOS下降(3.1 vs 2.5天;P = 0.03)。结论:实施无阻碍的TACS外科医生管理紧急外科疾病,提高了一级创伤中心安全网络中胆囊切除术患者获得和提供手术服务的机会。需要进一步的研究来确定医院成本和患者满意度的潜在改善。
{"title":"An Unencumbered Acute Care Surgeon Improves Delivery of Emergent Surgical Care for Cholecystectomy Patients.","authors":"Alexis L Cralley,&nbsp;Clay C Burlew,&nbsp;Charles J Fox,&nbsp;Fredric M Pieracci,&nbsp;K Barry K Platnick,&nbsp;Eric M Campion,&nbsp;Mitchell J Cohen,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Ryan A Lawless","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients utilize the Emergency Room (ER) for primary care, resulting in overburdened ERs, strained resources, and delays in care. To combat this, many centers have adopted a Trauma/Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service providing specialty surgeons whose primary work is the unencumbered surgical availability to emergency surgery patients. To evaluate our programs' efficacy, we investigated cholecystectomies as a common urgent procedure representative of services provided. We hypothesized that the adoption of a TACS service would result in improved access to care as evidence by decreased ER visits prior to cholecystectomy, improved time to cholecystectomy, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients that underwent urgent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. The unencumbered TACS surgeon was implemented on July 1, 2018. Prior ER visits involving biliary symptoms, time from admission to cholecystectomy, and hospital LOS were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 322 urgent cholecystectomies over the study period, 165 were performed prior and 157 following adoption of the TACS structure. The average number of ER visits for biliary symptoms prior to cholecystectomy decreased from 1.4 to 1.2 (p = 0.01). Time from admission to cholecystectomy was 28.3 hours and 27.3 hours respectively (p = 0.74). Average LOS decreased following the restructure (3.1 vs 2.5 days; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of an unencumbered TACS surgeon managing urgent surgical disease improves access to and delivery of surgical services for cholecystectomy patients in a safety net, level one trauma center. Further research is necessary to determine potential improvements in hospital cost and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e5/a3/e2022.00045.PMC9521635.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33497145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1