首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
The Sling Technique for Laparoscopic Liver Mobilization. 腹腔镜肝脏移动吊带技术。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00011
Andrew N de la Torre, Justin Adibi, Zaineb Zubair

Background: As liver surgery continues to evolve, be it open, laparoscopic or robotic, it remains a procedure that can deteriorate in the blink of an eye. Liver surgery in patients with hepatoma is further complicated, as the vast majority have significant fibrosis, if not cirrhosis. Thus, parenchymal sparing resection is increasingly necessary. Effective and safe intracorporeal mobilization of the liver is essential for minimal access parenchymal-sparing and conventional resection.

Methods: This retrospective review of over 150 cases performed provides a hands-on approach to laparoscopic hepatic mobilization with the use of an inexpensive technique using a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver in-order to divide the ligaments holding the liver in place and optimally position the liver for parenchymal transection.

Results: Use of a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver intracorporeally is demonstrated to enable mobilization of the liver for tissue sparing non-anatomic, anatomic and major resections.

Conclusion: Use of a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver intracorporeally can facilitate mobilization for resection. Surgeons hoping to master minimal access resection should also be well versed in the use of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver transplant "Piggyback" technique.

背景:随着肝脏手术的不断发展,无论是开腹手术、腹腔镜手术还是机器人手术,都有可能在眨眼之间恶化。肝癌患者的肝脏手术更加复杂,因为绝大多数患者即使没有肝硬化,也有明显的肝纤维化。因此,越来越有必要进行肝实质切除。有效、安全的体腔内肝脏移动对于微创肝实质保留切除术和常规切除术至关重要:方法:这篇对150多例病例的回顾性研究提供了一种腹腔镜肝脏移动的实践方法,即使用1英寸的打包带将肝脏 "吊起",以分割固定肝脏的韧带,并使肝脏处于实质横切的最佳位置:结果:使用1英寸的打包带在肝脏内 "吊装 "肝脏,可在进行非解剖、解剖和大体切除时移动肝脏:结论:使用1英寸的打包带在肝脏内 "捆绑 "肝脏,有助于移动肝脏进行切除。希望掌握微创切除术的外科医生还应精通腹腔镜超声和肝移植 "背负式 "技术的使用。
{"title":"The Sling Technique for Laparoscopic Liver Mobilization.","authors":"Andrew N de la Torre, Justin Adibi, Zaineb Zubair","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As liver surgery continues to evolve, be it open, laparoscopic or robotic, it remains a procedure that can deteriorate in the blink of an eye. Liver surgery in patients with hepatoma is further complicated, as the vast majority have significant fibrosis, if not cirrhosis. Thus, parenchymal sparing resection is increasingly necessary. Effective and safe intracorporeal mobilization of the liver is essential for minimal access parenchymal-sparing and conventional resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review of over 150 cases performed provides a hands-on approach to laparoscopic hepatic mobilization with the use of an inexpensive technique using a 1\" packing tape to \"Sling\" the liver in-order to divide the ligaments holding the liver in place and optimally position the liver for parenchymal transection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of a 1\" packing tape to \"Sling\" the liver intracorporeally is demonstrated to enable mobilization of the liver for tissue sparing non-anatomic, anatomic and major resections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a 1\" packing tape to \"Sling\" the liver intracorporeally can facilitate mobilization for resection. Surgeons hoping to master minimal access resection should also be well versed in the use of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver transplant \"Piggyback\" technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. 美敦力Tri-StapleTM预装对接材料和AEONTM缝合器在减肥手术中止血和缝合线完整性的比较分析。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058
Gabrielle Hogan, Ravi Rao, Aditya Rao, Faran Talebi

Background and objectives: Haemostasis-related complications associated with Medtronic Tri-stapleTM with preloaded buttress material and the novel, naked AEONTM gastrointestinal staplers have not been extensively studied in bariatric surgery. The study aimed to assess and compare the 30-day haemostasis-related complications between Medtronic Tri-stapleTM and AEONTM GIA staplers.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent primary or revision sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or the sleeve component of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) in a private hospital in Australia between November 2021 and December 2022. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, using either Medtronic Tri-stapleTM or AEONTM staplers.

Results: The analysis included 250 patients, with the first 125 consecutive patients receiving staple line using the Medtronic Tri-stapleTM GIA stapler and the subsequent 125 patients receiving staple line using the AEONTM GIA stapler. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of surgical procedures between the Medtronic and AEON groups. In the AEON group, there were statistically higher numbers of diabetics and former tobacco users, while other preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The AEON group had a significantly longer mean operative time, while the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. No intraoperative or 30-day complications, deaths, emergency room visits, readmissions, or reoperations were observed in either group.

Conclusion: The novel, naked AEONTM stapler demonstrated non-inferiority to the established Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with preloaded buttress material in achieving hemostasis and maintaining staple-line integrity in bariatric surgery.

背景和目的:美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 预装对接材料和新型裸露 AEONTM 胃肠道订书机的止血相关并发症尚未在减肥手术中得到广泛研究。本研究旨在评估和比较美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 和 AEONTM GIA 订书机 30 天止血相关并发症:对 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在澳大利亚一家私立医院接受初次或翻修袖带胃切除术(SG)或单吻合十二指肠-回肠搭桥术袖带部分(SADI-S)的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。手术由一名外科医生使用美敦力 Tri-stapleTM 或 AEONTM 订书机进行:分析对象包括 250 名患者,其中前 125 名患者连续使用美敦力 Tri-stapleTM GIA 订书机接受缝合线手术,后 125 名患者使用 AEONTM GIA 订书机接受缝合线手术。统计分析显示,美敦力组和 AEON 组的手术程序分布无明显差异。据统计,AEON组中糖尿病患者和曾经吸烟者的人数较多,而两组患者的其他术前特征没有明显差异。AEON 组的平均手术时间明显更长,而住院时间则明显更短。两组患者均未出现术中或30天内并发症、死亡、急诊就诊、再入院或再次手术:结论:在减肥手术中,新型裸露 AEONTM 订书机在实现止血和保持订书机线完整性方面不劣于美敦力 Tri-StapleTM 订书机。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple<sup>TM</sup> with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEON<sup>TM</sup> Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Gabrielle Hogan, Ravi Rao, Aditya Rao, Faran Talebi","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Haemostasis-related complications associated with Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> with preloaded buttress material and the novel, naked AEON<sup>TM</sup> gastrointestinal staplers have not been extensively studied in bariatric surgery. The study aimed to assess and compare the 30-day haemostasis-related complications between Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> and AEON<sup>TM</sup> GIA staplers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent primary or revision sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or the sleeve component of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) in a private hospital in Australia between November 2021 and December 2022. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, using either Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> or AEON<sup>TM</sup> staplers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 250 patients, with the first 125 consecutive patients receiving staple line using the Medtronic Tri-staple<sup>TM</sup> GIA stapler and the subsequent 125 patients receiving staple line using the AEON<sup>TM</sup> GIA stapler. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of surgical procedures between the Medtronic and AEON groups. In the AEON group, there were statistically higher numbers of diabetics and former tobacco users, while other preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The AEON group had a significantly longer mean operative time, while the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. No intraoperative or 30-day complications, deaths, emergency room visits, readmissions, or reoperations were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel, naked AEON<sup>TM</sup> stapler demonstrated non-inferiority to the established Medtronic Tri-Staple<sup>TM</sup> with preloaded buttress material in achieving hemostasis and maintaining staple-line integrity in bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning. 医学研究的局限性:认识、影响和警告。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049
Douglas E Ott

Background: As the number of limitations increases in a medical research article, their consequences multiply and the validity of findings decreases. How often do limitations occur in a medical article? What are the implications of limitation interaction? How often are the conclusions hedged in their explanation?

Objective: To identify the number, type, and frequency of limitations and words used to describe conclusion(s) in medical research articles.

Methods: Search, analysis, and evaluation of open access research articles from 2021 and 2022 from the Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery and 2022 Surgical Endoscopy for type(s) of limitation(s) admitted to by author(s) and the number of times they occurred. Limitations not admitted to were found, obvious, and not claimed. An automated text analysis was performed for hedging words in conclusion statements. A limitation index score is proposed to gauge the validity of statements and conclusions as the number of limitations increases.

Results: A total of 298 articles were reviewed and analyzed, finding 1,764 limitations. Four articles had no limitations. The average was between 3.7% and 6.9% per article. Hedging, weasel words and words of estimative probability description was found in 95.6% of the conclusions.

Conclusions: Limitations and their number matter. The greater the number of limitations and ramifications of their effects, the more outcomes and conclusions are affected. Wording ambiguity using hedging or weasel words shows that limitations affect the uncertainty of claims. The limitation index scoring method shows the diminished validity of finding(s) and conclusion(s).

背景:随着医学研究文章中局限性的增加,其后果也会成倍增加,研究结果的有效性也会降低。在医学文章中,限制出现的频率如何?局限性相互作用的影响是什么?结论的解释有多少是对冲性的?确定医学研究文章中局限性的数量、类型和频率,以及用于描述结论的词语:搜索、分析和评估《腹腔镜和机器人手术学会杂志》和《2022 年外科内镜杂志》2021 年和 2022 年的开放存取研究文章,以了解作者承认的限制类型及其出现的次数。未承认的限制是发现的、明显的和未声称的。对结论陈述中的对冲词进行了自动文本分析。随着限制因素数量的增加,提出了限制因素指数分值来衡量声明和结论的有效性:共对 298 篇文章进行了审查和分析,发现了 1,764 个限制条件。有 4 篇文章没有局限性。平均每篇文章的局限性在 3.7% 到 6.9% 之间。在95.6%的结论中发现了套话、黄鼠狼词和估计概率描述词:结论:限制及其数量很重要。限制及其影响的数量越多,结果和结论受到的影响就越大。使用对冲词或黄鼠狼词进行模糊措辞表明,限制会影响索赔的不确定性。限制指数评分法显示了结果和结论的有效性降低。
{"title":"Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning.","authors":"Douglas E Ott","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the number of limitations increases in a medical research article, their consequences multiply and the validity of findings decreases. How often do limitations occur in a medical article? What are the implications of limitation interaction? How often are the conclusions hedged in their explanation?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the number, type, and frequency of limitations and words used to describe conclusion(s) in medical research articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search, analysis, and evaluation of open access research articles from 2021 and 2022 from the <i>Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery</i> and 2022 <i>Surgical Endoscopy</i> for type(s) of limitation(s) admitted to by author(s) and the number of times they occurred. Limitations not admitted to were found, obvious, and not claimed. An automated text analysis was performed for hedging words in conclusion statements. A limitation index score is proposed to gauge the validity of statements and conclusions as the number of limitations increases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 298 articles were reviewed and analyzed, finding 1,764 limitations. Four articles had no limitations. The average was between 3.7% and 6.9% per article. Hedging, weasel words and words of estimative probability description was found in 95.6% of the conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limitations and their number matter. The greater the number of limitations and ramifications of their effects, the more outcomes and conclusions are affected. Wording ambiguity using hedging or weasel words shows that limitations affect the uncertainty of claims. The limitation index scoring method shows the diminished validity of finding(s) and conclusion(s).</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up. 腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术--美国军队的长期随访经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059
Carolyn Judge, Jesse Bandle, Andrew Wang, Kyle Gadbois, Amanda Simsiman, Robin Wood, Gordon Wisbach

Objectives: We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution.

Methods: A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization. Long-term follow up was performed over the phone to assess quality of life with 2 widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys including RAND-36 Health Item Survey (Version 1.0),1 and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).2.

Results: Ten women underwent a laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) with 7 available for long-term follow-up. The average age was 28.9 years (20-37) and the indications for surgery included symptomatic cholelithiasis (9) and biliary dyskinesia (1). The mean operative time was 129 mins (95-180), and median blood loss was 34 ml (5-400). There were no conversions and the average length of stay was 9.98 hours (2.4-28.8). Pain (analogue scale 1-10) on postoperative day three was minimal (mean 2.3) and was limited to the infraumbilical incision. On average patients returned to work by postoperative day six and resumed normal daily activities at seven days. Immediate postoperative complications included one incident of postoperative urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. One intra-operative cholangiogram was successfully performed due to elevated preoperative liver enzymes without significant findings. Long-term complications included one asymptomatic incisional hernia repair at the infraumbilical port site. The RAND-36 survey demonstrated an average physical and mental health summary score of 82.2 and 63.7 with an average general health score of 63.6. The average FSFI total score was 21.8.

Conclusion: TVC is safe and effective. Implementation may improve operational readiness by returning service members to normal activities more expeditiously than conventional laparoscopy.

目的:介绍我们在军事机构应用自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)技术为十名患者实施胆囊切除术的初步临床经验:我们介绍了在一家军事机构应用自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)技术为十名患者实施胆囊切除术的初步临床经验:方法: 建立后结肠造口,以容纳单部位工作端口,用于在脐下端口直视下进行解剖和胆囊移动。标本经阴道取出,在直视下用可吸收缝线缝合结肠造口。通过电话进行长期随访,使用两种广泛使用的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)调查方法评估生活质量,包括兰德-36 健康项目调查(1.0 版)1 和女性性功能指数(FSFI)2:10名女性接受了腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术(TVC),其中7名接受了长期随访。平均年龄为 28.9 岁(20-37 岁),手术适应症包括症状性胆石症(9 例)和胆道运动障碍(1 例)。平均手术时间为 129 分钟(95-180 分钟),中位失血量为 34 毫升(5-400 毫升)。手术中无转归,平均住院时间为 9.98 小时(2.4-28.8)。术后第三天的疼痛(模拟评分 1-10)非常轻微(平均 2.3),且仅限于脐下切口。患者平均在术后第六天恢复工作,七天后恢复正常的日常活动。术后即刻出现的并发症包括一次术后尿潴留,需要进行膀胱导尿。由于术前肝酶升高,成功进行了一次术中胆管造影,但未发现明显异常。长期并发症包括一次无症状的切口疝修补术,切口位于脐下端口部位。兰德-36调查显示,患者的平均身心健康总分为82.2分和63.7分,平均一般健康分为63.6分。FSFI 总分平均为 21.8 分:TVC安全有效。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,实施 TVC 可使军人更快恢复正常活动,从而改善战备状态。
{"title":"Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.","authors":"Carolyn Judge, Jesse Bandle, Andrew Wang, Kyle Gadbois, Amanda Simsiman, Robin Wood, Gordon Wisbach","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization. Long-term follow up was performed over the phone to assess quality of life with 2 widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys including RAND-36 Health Item Survey (Version 1.0),<sup>1</sup> and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten women underwent a laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) with 7 available for long-term follow-up. The average age was 28.9 years (20-37) and the indications for surgery included symptomatic cholelithiasis (9) and biliary dyskinesia (1). The mean operative time was 129 mins (95-180), and median blood loss was 34 ml (5-400). There were no conversions and the average length of stay was 9.98 hours (2.4-28.8). Pain (analogue scale 1-10) on postoperative day three was minimal (mean 2.3) and was limited to the infraumbilical incision. On average patients returned to work by postoperative day six and resumed normal daily activities at seven days. Immediate postoperative complications included one incident of postoperative urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. One intra-operative cholangiogram was successfully performed due to elevated preoperative liver enzymes without significant findings. Long-term complications included one asymptomatic incisional hernia repair at the infraumbilical port site. The RAND-36 survey demonstrated an average physical and mental health summary score of 82.2 and 63.7 with an average general health score of 63.6. The average FSFI total score was 21.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TVC is safe and effective. Implementation may improve operational readiness by returning service members to normal activities more expeditiously than conventional laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984372/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publication. 人工智能与科学出版。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006
Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publication.","authors":"Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bilateral Spigelian Hernias Robotic Repair: A Novel Approach to a Rare Surgical Entity. 双侧斯皮格疝机器人修复术:罕见手术实体的新方法。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055
Jaime A Aponte-Ortiz, Isabel Mayorga Pérez, Luis Alamo Irizarry, Josean M Rosado Rivera, Jose E Romero Gines, Jorge Pelet-Mejías

Spigelian hernias are an uncommon protrusion defect noted between the rectus abdominis and the transversus abdominis muscles, at the semilunar line, with a low incidence of approximately 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral cases is noted to be even lower in the general population. They are associated with bowel incarceration and strangulation; hence surgical repair is indicated. Therapeutic alternatives for Spigelian hernias include open repair, however laparoscopic repair stands as the standard of care in these cases. Feasible and successful robotic repair has been reported, with associated advantages in terms of visualization and surgical instrument dexterity. We present the first ever reported cases of bilateral Spigelian hernias repaired using robotic approach. Two female Puerto Rican patients referred to our institution complaining of abdominal pain, where imaging studies found bilateral Spigelian hernias. In both cases, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was performed using the Da Vinci Surgical System. Both patients were discharged home tolerating oral intake with adequate wound healing. On follow up visits, patients denied abdominal discomfort and had adequate wound healing. Robotic surgery for Spigelian hernias poses an advantage over laparoscopic repair as improved visualization, mobility, and precision in movements allow for more gentle tissue manipulation. Furthermore, this is the first evidence of safe and effective repair in the uncommon entity of bilateral cases, providing a newer alternative in the setting of such presentation.

腹股沟疝是一种不常见的突出缺陷,位于腹直肌和腹横肌之间的半月线处,发病率较低,约占所有腹股沟疝的 0.12% 至 2%。此外,在普通人群中,双侧病例的发病率更低。腹股沟疝与肠嵌顿和绞窄有关,因此需要进行手术修补。Spigelian疝气的治疗方法包括开腹修补术,但腹腔镜修补术是此类病例的标准治疗方法。有报道称机器人修复术是可行且成功的,在可视化和手术器械灵巧性方面具有相关优势。我们首次报道了使用机器人方法修复双侧斯皮格疝的病例。两名波多黎各女性患者因腹痛转诊至我院,影像学检查发现她们患有双侧斯皮格疝。我们使用达芬奇手术系统对这两名患者进行了经腹腹膜前修补术。两名患者出院回家后都能耐受口服药物,伤口也充分愈合。在随访中,患者否认腹部不适,伤口也充分愈合。与腹腔镜修复术相比,机器人手术治疗斯皮格疝更具优势,因为机器人手术的可视性、移动性和动作精确性都有所提高,可以更轻柔地操作组织。此外,这也是首次有证据表明,双侧病例的修复手术安全有效,为此类病例提供了新的选择。
{"title":"Bilateral Spigelian Hernias Robotic Repair: A Novel Approach to a Rare Surgical Entity.","authors":"Jaime A Aponte-Ortiz, Isabel Mayorga Pérez, Luis Alamo Irizarry, Josean M Rosado Rivera, Jose E Romero Gines, Jorge Pelet-Mejías","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spigelian hernias are an uncommon protrusion defect noted between the rectus abdominis and the transversus abdominis muscles, at the semilunar line, with a low incidence of approximately 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral cases is noted to be even lower in the general population. They are associated with bowel incarceration and strangulation; hence surgical repair is indicated. Therapeutic alternatives for Spigelian hernias include open repair, however laparoscopic repair stands as the standard of care in these cases. Feasible and successful robotic repair has been reported, with associated advantages in terms of visualization and surgical instrument dexterity. We present the first ever reported cases of bilateral Spigelian hernias repaired using robotic approach. Two female Puerto Rican patients referred to our institution complaining of abdominal pain, where imaging studies found bilateral Spigelian hernias. In both cases, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was performed using the Da Vinci Surgical System. Both patients were discharged home tolerating oral intake with adequate wound healing. On follow up visits, patients denied abdominal discomfort and had adequate wound healing. Robotic surgery for Spigelian hernias poses an advantage over laparoscopic repair as improved visualization, mobility, and precision in movements allow for more gentle tissue manipulation. Furthermore, this is the first evidence of safe and effective repair in the uncommon entity of bilateral cases, providing a newer alternative in the setting of such presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Experience with the Senhance Surgical System in Bariatric Surgery. 减肥手术中使用 Senhance 手术系统的早期经验。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031
Tuan Tran, Francisco Irizarry, Shreya Gunda, Denise Danos, Michael Cook

Background and objectives: Robotic-assisted surgery advancements have paralleled growing bariatric surgery demands. The Senhance robotic platform offers an alternative to the da Vinci surgical system but there are limited studies evaluating the Senhance system in bariatric surgery. This study aims to review a single surgeon's experience comparing outcomes between traditional laparoscopic and Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.

Materials and methods: All sleeve gastrectomies performed laparoscopically, Senhance-assisted, or da Vinci-assisted by a single surgeon at an academic center from January 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes and quality measures were 30-day complications, operative times and length of stay.

Results: A total of 268 patients, including 162 laparoscopic, 92 Senhance, and 14 da Vinci cases, were included. Operative times were significantly longer with Senhance (115.7 min) and da Vinci (122.7 min), compared to laparoscopic (94.8 min, P < .0001). Length of stay (measured in days) was significantly longer in the Senhance (1.8) and da Vinci (2.2) groups compared to laparoscopic cases (1.5, P < .0001). These differences remained significant after controlling for age, sex and body mass index. 30-day complication rates were 8.7% (n = 8) in the Senhance group, 7.1% (n = 1) in the da Vinci group and 2.5% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic group (P = .0567).

Conclusion: Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy is safe in bariatric surgery and comparable to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to 30-day complications.

背景和目的:随着减肥手术需求的增长,机器人辅助手术也在不断进步。Senhance 机器人平台提供了达芬奇手术系统的替代方案,但评估 Senhance 系统在减肥手术中应用的研究还很有限。本研究旨在回顾一位外科医生的经验,比较传统腹腔镜和Senhance辅助袖状胃切除术的效果:回顾性审查了一个学术中心的一名外科医生在2019年1月至2021年7月期间通过腹腔镜、Senhance辅助或达芬奇辅助实施的所有袖状胃切除术。主要结果和质量指标为30天并发症、手术时间和住院时间:共纳入268例患者,包括162例腹腔镜手术、92例Senhance手术和14例达芬奇手术。与腹腔镜手术(94.8分钟,P P = .0567)相比,Senhance手术(115.7分钟)和达芬奇手术(122.7分钟)的手术时间明显更长:结论:Senhance辅助袖状胃切除术在减肥手术中是安全的,在30天并发症方面与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相当。
{"title":"Early Experience with the Senhance Surgical System in Bariatric Surgery.","authors":"Tuan Tran, Francisco Irizarry, Shreya Gunda, Denise Danos, Michael Cook","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery advancements have paralleled growing bariatric surgery demands. The Senhance robotic platform offers an alternative to the da Vinci surgical system but there are limited studies evaluating the Senhance system in bariatric surgery. This study aims to review a single surgeon's experience comparing outcomes between traditional laparoscopic and Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All sleeve gastrectomies performed laparoscopically, Senhance-assisted, or da Vinci-assisted by a single surgeon at an academic center from January 2019 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes and quality measures were 30-day complications, operative times and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 268 patients, including 162 laparoscopic, 92 Senhance, and 14 da Vinci cases, were included. Operative times were significantly longer with Senhance (115.7 min) and da Vinci (122.7 min), compared to laparoscopic (94.8 min, <i>P</i> < .0001). Length of stay (measured in days) was significantly longer in the Senhance (1.8) and da Vinci (2.2) groups compared to laparoscopic cases (1.5, <i>P</i> < .0001). These differences remained significant after controlling for age, sex and body mass index. 30-day complication rates were 8.7% (n = 8) in the Senhance group, 7.1% (n = 1) in the da Vinci group and 2.5% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic group (<i>P</i> = .0567).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Senhance-assisted sleeve gastrectomy is safe in bariatric surgery and comparable to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with respect to 30-day complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139972462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Slim-Mesh" Technique for Diastasis Recti Abdominis, Including Obesity-Related Cases. "纤网 "技术治疗腹肌松弛症,包括与肥胖有关的病例。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003
Silvio Alen Canton

Background and objective: We operated on a series of mostly obese patients with diastasis recti abdominis using the "Slim-Mesh" technique to repair/reinforce the diastasis and linea alba/recti muscles without plicating and traumatizing them. Additional objectives were to decrease operation time and intra- and postoperative complications.

Methods: We considered T1 cases diastasis after pregnancy and T2 cases obesity (BMI ≥ 30 mg/kg2); D1, D2, and D3 when the diastasis measured 2-3, 3-5, and ≥ 5 cm, respectively; H0 and H1 without and concomitant umbilical and/or epigastric hernia, respectively. At our Department, between May 2010 and November 2022, 47 patients with diastasis recti were operated on with the "Slim-Mesh" technique to reinforce/repair the traumatized linea alba/recti muscles, without plicating them. This was a prospective (83%)-retrospective study.

Results: We studied 23 males and 24 females. Mean age and BMI was 58 years and 29 kg/m2, respectively. Groups D1, D2, and D3 comprised 6, 23 and 18 patients, respectively; groups T1, T2, H0 and H1 comprised 22, 25, 13 and 34 patients, respectively. Mean operation time for all cases was 100 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days and follow-up time was 5 years. We had 6 late postoperative complications: 3 hernia recurrences and 3 trocar site hernias.

Conclusion: Considering the lack of agreement on the best surgery for diastasis recti abdominis repair, in our experience the "Slim-Mesh" technique is a valid, safe and easy-to-reproduce way to save, repair and reinforce linea alba/recti muscles in diastasis recti patients, including the obese population (53%).

背景和目的:我们使用 "超薄网 "技术为一系列腹部直肌松弛的肥胖患者进行了手术,在不对腹部直肌和白线/直肌进行钢板固定和创伤的情况下修复/加固了松弛的腹部直肌。其他目标是缩短手术时间,减少术中和术后并发症:方法:我们将妊娠后腹膜膨出视为 T1,肥胖(体重指数≥30 mg/kg2)视为 T2;腹膜膨出分别为 2-3、3-5 和≥5 cm 时视为 D1、D2 和 D3;无脐疝和/或上腹部疝的患者分别视为 H0 和 H1,合并脐疝和/或上腹部疝的患者视为 H1 和 H1。在 2010 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间,我科采用 "超薄网 "技术为 47 名直肠松弛症患者进行了手术,以加固/修复受创的白线/直肠肌肉,而不对其进行钢板固定。这是一项前瞻性(83%)-回顾性研究:我们研究了 23 名男性和 24 名女性。平均年龄和体重指数分别为 58 岁和 29 kg/m2。D1、D2和D3组分别有6、23和18名患者;T1、T2、H0和H1组分别有22、25、13和34名患者。所有病例的平均手术时间为 100 分钟。平均住院时间为 2.3 天,随访时间为 5 年。术后晚期并发症有 6 例:结论:考虑到对腹壁直肠膨出修复的最佳手术方法缺乏共识,根据我们的经验,"Slim-Mesh "技术是拯救、修复和加固腹壁直肠膨出患者(包括肥胖人群(53%))腹壁白线/直肌的有效、安全且易于重复使用的方法。
{"title":"\"Slim-Mesh\" Technique for Diastasis Recti Abdominis, Including Obesity-Related Cases.","authors":"Silvio Alen Canton","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>We operated on a series of mostly obese patients with diastasis recti abdominis using the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique to repair/reinforce the diastasis and linea alba/recti muscles without plicating and traumatizing them. Additional objectives were to decrease operation time and intra- and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We considered T1 cases diastasis after pregnancy and T2 cases obesity (BMI ≥ 30 mg/kg<sup>2</sup>); D1, D2, and D3 when the diastasis measured 2-3, 3-5, and ≥ 5 cm, respectively; H0 and H1 without and concomitant umbilical and/or epigastric hernia, respectively. At our Department, between May 2010 and November 2022, 47 patients with diastasis recti were operated on with the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique to reinforce/repair the traumatized linea alba/recti muscles, without plicating them. This was a prospective (83%)-retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 23 males and 24 females. Mean age and BMI was 58 years and 29 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Groups D1, D2, and D3 comprised 6, 23 and 18 patients, respectively; groups T1, T2, H0 and H1 comprised 22, 25, 13 and 34 patients, respectively. Mean operation time for all cases was 100 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2.3 days and follow-up time was 5 years. We had 6 late postoperative complications: 3 hernia recurrences and 3 trocar site hernias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the lack of agreement on the best surgery for diastasis recti abdominis repair, in our experience the \"Slim-Mesh\" technique is a valid, safe and easy-to-reproduce way to save, repair and reinforce linea alba/recti muscles in diastasis recti patients, including the obese population (53%).</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984376/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Bariatric Surgery's Impact on Weight Loss and Diabetes: Sodium and Glucose Receptor Modulation. 探索减肥手术对减肥和糖尿病的影响:钠和葡萄糖受体调节。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051
Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam, Mitchell Roslin, Amit Surve

Sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT) and glucose transporters (GLUT) have been shown to influence diabetes management by modulating glucose uptake by the intestine. Therefore, alterations in gastrointestinal anatomy during bariatric surgery can change SGLT and GLUT receptor activity. These changes offer an additional mechanism for weight loss and may explain the differential impact of the various bariatric surgical procedures. This review examines the current literature on SGLT and GLUT receptors and their effects on weight loss through genetic studies, pharmacologic inhibition, and how SGLT/GLUT receptors impact surgical physiologic modulation. A better understanding of Type I sodium-glucose cotransport receptors (SGLT-1), GLUT-2, and GLUT-5 could provide insight for improved procedures and allow us to determine the best method to tailor operations to a patient's individual needs.

钠-葡萄糖共转运体(SGLT)和葡萄糖转运体(GLUT)通过调节肠道对葡萄糖的吸收而影响糖尿病的治疗。因此,减肥手术中胃肠道解剖结构的改变会改变 SGLT 和 GLUT 受体的活性。这些变化为减肥提供了另一种机制,并可能解释各种减肥手术的不同影响。本综述通过基因研究、药物抑制以及 SGLT/GLUT 受体如何影响手术生理调节等方面,探讨了有关 SGLT 和 GLUT 受体及其对减肥影响的现有文献。更好地了解 I 型钠-葡萄糖共转运受体 (SGLT-1)、GLUT-2 和 GLUT-5 可为改进手术提供洞察力,并使我们能够确定根据患者的个人需求量身定制手术的最佳方法。
{"title":"Exploring Bariatric Surgery's Impact on Weight Loss and Diabetes: Sodium and Glucose Receptor Modulation.","authors":"Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam, Mitchell Roslin, Amit Surve","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT) and glucose transporters (GLUT) have been shown to influence diabetes management by modulating glucose uptake by the intestine. Therefore, alterations in gastrointestinal anatomy during bariatric surgery can change SGLT and GLUT receptor activity. These changes offer an additional mechanism for weight loss and may explain the differential impact of the various bariatric surgical procedures. This review examines the current literature on SGLT and GLUT receptors and their effects on weight loss through genetic studies, pharmacologic inhibition, and how SGLT/GLUT receptors impact surgical physiologic modulation. A better understanding of Type I sodium-glucose cotransport receptors (SGLT-1), GLUT-2, and GLUT-5 could provide insight for improved procedures and allow us to determine the best method to tailor operations to a patient's individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984375/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ovarian Loss in Laparoscopic and Robotic Cystectomy Compared Using Artificial Intelligence Pathology. 利用人工智能病理学比较腹腔镜和机器人膀胱切除术中的卵巢损失。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001
Rooma Sinha, Himabindu Rallabandi, Rupa Bana, Moumita Bag, Rohit Raina, Sridhar D, Deepika H K, Padmapriya Reddy

A Comparison of Ovarian Loss Following Laparoscopic versus Robotic Cystectomy As Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Software.

Background and objective: To compare the area of ovarian tissue and follicular loss in the excised cystectomy specimen of endometrioma performed by laparoscopic or robotic technique.

Methods: Prospective observational study performed between April 2023 to August 2023. There were 14 patients each in Laparoscopic group (LC) and Robotic group (RC). Excised cyst wall sent was for to the pathologist who was blinded to the technique used for cystectomy. The pathological assessment was done by artificial intelligence-Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) software.

Results: The age was significantly lower in LC group; the rest of demographic results were comparable. The mean of the median ovarian area loss [Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)] was higher in LC group. The mean of the median total follicular loss was higher in LC group (8.9 ± 9.2) when compared to RC group (6.3 ± 8.9) and was not significant. The area of ovarian loss in bilateral endometrioma was significantly higher in LC group (mean rank 7.5) as compared to RC group (mean rank 3) - (P = .016) despite more cases of bilateral disease in RC group. With increasing cyst size the LC group showed increased median loss of follicles when compared to RC group (strong correlation coefficient 0.347) but not statistically significant (P = .225). AAGL (American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) score did not have any impact on the two techniques.

Conclusion: Robotic assistance reduces the area of ovarian and follicular loss during cystectomy of endometrioma especially in bilateral disease and increasing cyst size. It should be considered over the laparoscopic approach if available.

人工智能病理软件分析腹腔镜与机器人膀胱切除术后卵巢损失的比较.背景和目的:比较采用腹腔镜或机器人技术进行子宫内膜异位症膀胱切除术标本的卵巢组织面积和卵泡损失:比较采用腹腔镜或机器人技术进行子宫内膜异位症膀胱切除术标本中卵巢组织和卵泡丢失的面积:方法:2023年4月至2023年8月期间进行的前瞻性观察研究。腹腔镜组(LC)和机器人组(RC)各有 14 名患者。切除的囊壁送至病理学家处,病理学家对膀胱切除术所使用的技术是盲法。病理评估由人工智能全切片成像(WSI)软件完成:结果:LC 组患者的年龄明显偏低,其他人口统计学结果相当。LC组卵巢中位面积损失的平均值[Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)]更高。与 RC 组(6.3 ± 8.9)相比,LC 组卵泡总损失中位数的平均值更高(8.9 ± 9.2),但无显著性差异。双侧子宫内膜异位症的卵巢损失面积在 LC 组(平均值为 7.5)明显高于 RC 组(平均值为 3)--(P = .016),尽管 RC 组的双侧病例更多。与 RC 组相比,随着囊肿的增大,LC 组的卵泡损失中位数增加(强相关系数 0.347),但无统计学意义(P = .225)。AAGL(美国妇科腹腔镜医师协会)评分对两种技术没有任何影响:结论:在子宫内膜异位瘤囊肿切除术中,机器人辅助减少了卵巢和卵泡损失的面积,尤其是在双侧疾病和囊肿增大的情况下。如果有条件,应考虑使用机器人辅助,而不是腹腔镜方法。
{"title":"Ovarian Loss in Laparoscopic and Robotic Cystectomy Compared Using Artificial Intelligence Pathology.","authors":"Rooma Sinha, Himabindu Rallabandi, Rupa Bana, Moumita Bag, Rohit Raina, Sridhar D, Deepika H K, Padmapriya Reddy","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A Comparison of Ovarian Loss Following Laparoscopic versus Robotic Cystectomy As Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Software.</p><p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To compare the area of ovarian tissue and follicular loss in the excised cystectomy specimen of endometrioma performed by laparoscopic or robotic technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study performed between April 2023 to August 2023. There were 14 patients each in Laparoscopic group (LC) and Robotic group (RC). Excised cyst wall sent was for to the pathologist who was blinded to the technique used for cystectomy. The pathological assessment was done by artificial intelligence-Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age was significantly lower in LC group; the rest of demographic results were comparable. The mean of the median ovarian area loss [Mean Rank, LC group (9.1 ± 15.1); RC (8.1 ± 12.4)] was higher in LC group. The mean of the median total follicular loss was higher in LC group (8.9 ± 9.2) when compared to RC group (6.3 ± 8.9) and was not significant. The area of ovarian loss in bilateral endometrioma was significantly higher in LC group (mean rank 7.5) as compared to RC group (mean rank 3) - (<i>P</i> = .016) despite more cases of bilateral disease in RC group. With increasing cyst size the LC group showed increased median loss of follicles when compared to RC group (strong correlation coefficient 0.347) but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .225). AAGL (American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) score did not have any impact on the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic assistance reduces the area of ovarian and follicular loss during cystectomy of endometrioma especially in bilateral disease and increasing cyst size. It should be considered over the laparoscopic approach if available.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1