首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Robotic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis. 机器人胆总管探查胆总管结石。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00075
Chi Zhang, Dillon C Cheung, Eleanor Johnson, McKinna Tillotson, Hasan Al Harakeh, Nicholas Nolan, Zhi V Fong, Megan Nelson, Irving Jorge

Background and objectives: Robotic surgery has facilitated minimally invasive surgery with its enhanced visualization and improved dexterity compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. However, widespread adoption remains limited by steep learning curves. We describe procedural steps, technical considerations, and early clinical outcomes with a 1-stage robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration.

Methods: A single-institution case series of 21 patients undergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration from October 2022 to August 2024 was retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Nine patients were female (43%), and the median age was 70 (interquartile range [IQR] 64-76). No patient required conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy. Two patients (10%) required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for duct clearance. The median total operative time was 215 minutes (IQR 180-290). The median fluoroscopy time was 1.5 minutes (IQR 1.2-2.1). We review the bed orientation, overall room set up, and robot arms rearrangements that were required to accommodate the C-arm for intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration is possible but requires dedicated equipment and staff arrangements. Engagement of hospital staff including surgeons, anesthesiologists, radiology technicians, operating room nurses, and surgical technologists are paramount for success.

背景和目的:与开放和腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术以其增强的可视化和提高的灵活性促进了微创手术。然而,广泛采用仍然受到陡峭的学习曲线的限制。我们描述了手术步骤,技术考虑,和早期临床结果的一期机器人辅助胆囊切除术与胆总管探查。方法:回顾性分析2022年10月至2024年8月接受机器人辅助胆囊切除术并胆总管探查的21例单院病例系列。结果:女性9例(43%),中位年龄70岁(四分位数范围[IQR] 64 ~ 76)。没有病人需要转到剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查。2例患者(10%)术后需要内镜逆行胆管造影清除胆管。中位总手术时间为215分钟(IQR 180-290)。中位透视时间为1.5分钟(IQR 1.2-2.1)。我们回顾了床的朝向,整个房间的设置,以及机器人手臂的重新安排,以适应术中透视的c型手臂。结论:机器人辅助胆囊切除术伴胆总管探查是可行的,但需要专门的设备和人员安排。包括外科医生、麻醉师、放射技师、手术室护士和外科技术人员在内的医院工作人员的参与对成功至关重要。
{"title":"Robotic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.","authors":"Chi Zhang, Dillon C Cheung, Eleanor Johnson, McKinna Tillotson, Hasan Al Harakeh, Nicholas Nolan, Zhi V Fong, Megan Nelson, Irving Jorge","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00075","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Robotic surgery has facilitated minimally invasive surgery with its enhanced visualization and improved dexterity compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. However, widespread adoption remains limited by steep learning curves. We describe procedural steps, technical considerations, and early clinical outcomes with a 1-stage robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution case series of 21 patients undergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration from October 2022 to August 2024 was retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients were female (43%), and the median age was 70 (interquartile range [IQR] 64-76). No patient required conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy. Two patients (10%) required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for duct clearance. The median total operative time was 215 minutes (IQR 180-290). The median fluoroscopy time was 1.5 minutes (IQR 1.2-2.1). We review the bed orientation, overall room set up, and robot arms rearrangements that were required to accommodate the C-arm for intraoperative fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration is possible but requires dedicated equipment and staff arrangements. Engagement of hospital staff including surgeons, anesthesiologists, radiology technicians, operating room nurses, and surgical technologists are paramount for success.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11935646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143719974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Umbilical Morcellation and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Benign Hysterectomy. 良性子宫切除术患者脐裂与术后疼痛。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00052
Colette Gnade, Kelly Kasper

Background: Morcellation has allowed patients with enlarged uteri to obtain a minimally invasive hysterectomy with improved outcomes; however, there is little information regarding postoperative pain. Our study aims to compare pain scores and opioid requirements in patients undergoing umbilical morcellation during benign minimally invasive hysterectomy versus those who do not require morcellation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary care center including patients who underwent total laparoscopic or supracervical hysterectomy by one high volume surgeon from 2019 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and morphine milligram equivalents in the acute and late setting were recorded. Two-sample t test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used to compare differences. A multiple regression model evaluated the effect of groups with the adjustment of confounders.

Results: A total of 232 patients underwent hysterectomy in which 57 underwent umbilical manual morcellation and 175 did not. There was no difference in postoperative complications, readmissions, or blood products required (P > 0.05). Individuals that underwent umbilical morcellation had longer operative times (226.6 vs 120.1 minutes, P < 0.01), more blood loss (311.1 vs 82.0 mL, P < 0.01), longer length of stay (0.60 vs 0.44 days, P < 0.01), increased uterine weight (1,293.2 vs 151.6 g, P < 0.01), and fibroid pathology (93.0% vs 46.3%, P < 0.01). There were no differences in postoperative pain scores, immediate and later opioid use between groups on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Patients who undergo umbilical morcellation, typically for large fibroid uteri, have similar postoperative pain scores, opioid use, and postoperative complications to those who undergo hysterectomy for other indications.

背景:分块术可以使子宫增大的患者获得微创子宫切除术,并改善预后;然而,关于术后疼痛的信息很少。我们的研究目的是比较在良性微创子宫切除术中接受脐带碎裂的患者与不需要碎裂的患者的疼痛评分和阿片类药物需求。方法:回顾性队列研究在三级保健中心进行,包括2019年至2022年由一名高容量外科医生进行全腹腔镜或宫颈上子宫切除术的患者。记录基线特征、术后疼痛评分和急性和晚期吗啡毫克当量。对连续变量采用两样本t检验,对分类变量采用χ2或Fisher精确检验比较差异。采用多元回归模型评估各组混杂因素调整后的效果。结果:232例患者行子宫切除术,其中57例行脐手切术,175例未行。术后并发症、再入院或所需血液制品方面无差异(P < 0.05)。接受脐带分切术的个体手术时间更长(226.6 vs 120.1分钟,P P P P P P结论:接受脐带分切术的患者,通常是大肌瘤子宫,术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物使用和术后并发症与因其他适应症接受子宫切除术的患者相似。
{"title":"Umbilical Morcellation and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Benign Hysterectomy.","authors":"Colette Gnade, Kelly Kasper","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00052","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morcellation has allowed patients with enlarged uteri to obtain a minimally invasive hysterectomy with improved outcomes; however, there is little information regarding postoperative pain. Our study aims to compare pain scores and opioid requirements in patients undergoing umbilical morcellation during benign minimally invasive hysterectomy versus those who do not require morcellation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary care center including patients who underwent total laparoscopic or supracervical hysterectomy by one high volume surgeon from 2019 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and morphine milligram equivalents in the acute and late setting were recorded. Two-sample <i>t</i> test for continuous variables and χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used to compare differences. A multiple regression model evaluated the effect of groups with the adjustment of confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients underwent hysterectomy in which 57 underwent umbilical manual morcellation and 175 did not. There was no difference in postoperative complications, readmissions, or blood products required (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Individuals that underwent umbilical morcellation had longer operative times (226.6 vs 120.1 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.01), more blood loss (311.1 vs 82.0 mL, <i>P</i> < 0.01), longer length of stay (0.60 vs 0.44 days, <i>P</i> < 0.01), increased uterine weight (1,293.2 vs 151.6 g, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and fibroid pathology (93.0% vs 46.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). There were no differences in postoperative pain scores, immediate and later opioid use between groups on multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who undergo umbilical morcellation, typically for large fibroid uteri, have similar postoperative pain scores, opioid use, and postoperative complications to those who undergo hysterectomy for other indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967719/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis. 腹腔镜与机器人选择性乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00079
Peyton Margaret Weaver Murdock, Alexander Carmelo Venero, Robert Eric Heidel, Blake William Hale, Andrew Joseph Russ

Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques for colorectal surgery have continued to grow in prevalence with robotic surgery potentially providing advantages in complex pelvic operations. We sought to examine the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic elective sigmoid colon resection for complicated diverticulitis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients at an academic tertiary care center from 2018-2023 who underwent elective minimally invasive sigmoid colon resections for complicated diverticulitis. Multiple regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes being reoperation within 30 days and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operative time, days until return of bowel function, and length of stay.

Results: In this cohort of 131 patients, 38 underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 93 patients underwent robotic colectomy. There were no significant differences between rate of reoperation (7.7% vs 2.1%, P =.42), complications (5.1% vs 8.4%, P =.52), conversion to open (5.1% vs 2.1%, P =.25), days until return of bowel function (1.87 vs 2.01, P =.41), or length of stay (5.2 vs 5.2, P =.92). There were significant differences in operative time and estimated blood loss. Robotic approach was 128.11 minutes longer (β = 128.11, SE = 12, p <.001) and had 33.4 cc less estimated blood loss (β = -33.4, SE = 16.6, P =.046), when adjusting for other confounders.

Conclusion: Robotic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis had mostly equivalent outcomes at this institution. There was some decrease in estimated blood loss, however, operative time was increased in the robotic group.

目的:结肠直肠手术的微创手术技术持续增长,机器人手术可能在复杂的骨盆手术中提供优势。我们试图检查腹腔镜与机器人选择性乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎的结果。方法:我们对2018-2023年在一家学术三级医疗中心接受选择性微创乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎的患者进行了回顾性研究。以30天内再手术和总并发症为主要结果进行多元回归分析。次要结局包括转开腹、估计失血量、手术时间、肠功能恢复天数和住院时间。结果:在131例患者中,38例患者接受了腹腔镜结肠切除术,93例患者接受了机器人结肠切除术。再手术率(7.7% vs 2.1%, P = 0.42)、并发症(5.1% vs 8.4%, P = 0.52)、中转开腹(5.1% vs 2.1%, P = 0.25)、肠功能恢复天数(1.87 vs 2.01, P = 0.41)或住院时间(5.2 vs 5.2, P = 0.92)之间无显著差异。两组在手术时间和估计失血量上有显著差异。在调整其他混杂因素后,机器人方法延长了128.11分钟(β = 128.11, SE = 12, p .001),估计失血量减少了33.4 cc (β = -33.4, SE = 16.6, p = 0.046)。结论:机器人乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎的效果基本相同。估计失血量有所减少,然而,机器人组的手术时间有所增加。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis.","authors":"Peyton Margaret Weaver Murdock, Alexander Carmelo Venero, Robert Eric Heidel, Blake William Hale, Andrew Joseph Russ","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00079","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive surgical techniques for colorectal surgery have continued to grow in prevalence with robotic surgery potentially providing advantages in complex pelvic operations. We sought to examine the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic elective sigmoid colon resection for complicated diverticulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients at an academic tertiary care center from 2018-2023 who underwent elective minimally invasive sigmoid colon resections for complicated diverticulitis. Multiple regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes being reoperation within 30 days and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operative time, days until return of bowel function, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort of 131 patients, 38 underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 93 patients underwent robotic colectomy. There were no significant differences between rate of reoperation (7.7% vs 2.1%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.42), complications (5.1% vs 8.4%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.52), conversion to open (5.1% vs 2.1%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.25), days until return of bowel function (1.87 vs 2.01, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.41), or length of stay (5.2 vs 5.2, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.92). There were significant differences in operative time and estimated blood loss. Robotic approach was 128.11 minutes longer (β = 128.11, SE = 12, <i>p </i><<i> </i>.001) and had 33.4 cc less estimated blood loss (β = -33.4, SE = 16.6, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>.046), when adjusting for other confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis had mostly equivalent outcomes at this institution. There was some decrease in estimated blood loss, however, operative time was increased in the robotic group.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally Invasive Surgery Benefits Frail Patients Undergoing Emergency Hernia Repairs. 微创手术有利于接受紧急疝气修复的虚弱患者。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00049
Anna Distler, Ruben Salas Parra, Xueqi Huang, Hanaa Ahmed, Rafael Barrera, Vihas Patel, Laura Hansen

Background: Compared to elective surgery, emergent hernia repairs carry higher morbidity. Additionally, frailty is independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to assess if the surgical approach, minimally invasive surgery versus open, confers improved outcomes for frail patients who underwent emergent hernia repairs.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2018-2020) was queried for patients who underwent emergency hernia repair by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes (49505-49659). A modified frailty index-5 score was calculated; only frail patients with a score of ≥2 were included. The impact of surgical approach on length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality was determined by multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 1,893 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients (56.5%) were female, and 61.4% of patients were age ≥65. Most patients (83.62%) underwent open repair. After adjusting for covariates, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a shorter length of stay compared to open surgery (hazard ratio = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [1.06,1.41]; P = .006). Surgical approach was not associated with a difference in 30-day mortality (P =.28) or discharge destination (P = .97).

Conclusion: Minimally invasive emergent hernia repairs in frail patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database cohort are associated with a shorter length of stay compared to open surgery, without increased 30-day mortality or change in discharge destination. Prospective studies are needed to validate best-practices in treating frail surgical patients.

背景:与择期手术相比,紧急疝修补术的发病率更高。此外,虚弱与较差的术后结果独立相关。本研究旨在评估手术方式,微创手术与开放手术,是否能改善接受紧急疝修补术的虚弱患者的预后。方法:根据现行程序术语(CPT)代码(49505-49659)查询国家外科质量改进计划数据库(2018-2020)中接受急诊疝修补术的患者。计算修正后的脆弱指数-5评分;仅纳入评分≥2分的体弱患者。通过多变量分析确定手术入路对住院时间、出院目的地和死亡率的影响。结果:共有1893例患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者(56.5%)为女性,61.4%的患者年龄≥65岁。大多数患者(83.62%)采用开放式修复。调整协变量后,微创手术患者的住院时间比开放手术短(风险比= 1.22;95%置信区间[1.06,1.41];p = .006)。手术入路与30天死亡率(P = 0.28)或出院目的地(P = 0.97)无关。结论:与开放手术相比,国家外科质量改进计划数据库队列中虚弱患者的微创紧急疝修补术与更短的住院时间相关,没有增加30天死亡率或改变出院目的地。需要前瞻性研究来验证治疗虚弱外科患者的最佳做法。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Surgery Benefits Frail Patients Undergoing Emergency Hernia Repairs.","authors":"Anna Distler, Ruben Salas Parra, Xueqi Huang, Hanaa Ahmed, Rafael Barrera, Vihas Patel, Laura Hansen","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00049","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to elective surgery, emergent hernia repairs carry higher morbidity. Additionally, frailty is independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to assess if the surgical approach, minimally invasive surgery versus open, confers improved outcomes for frail patients who underwent emergent hernia repairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2018-2020) was queried for patients who underwent emergency hernia repair by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes (49505-49659). A modified frailty index-5 score was calculated; only frail patients with a score of ≥2 were included. The impact of surgical approach on length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality was determined by multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,893 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients (56.5%) were female, and 61.4% of patients were age ≥65. Most patients (83.62%) underwent open repair. After adjusting for covariates, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a shorter length of stay compared to open surgery (hazard ratio = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [1.06,1.41]; <i>P</i> = .006). Surgical approach was not associated with a difference in 30-day mortality (<i>P</i> =.28) or discharge destination (<i>P</i> = .97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive emergent hernia repairs in frail patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database cohort are associated with a shorter length of stay compared to open surgery, without increased 30-day mortality or change in discharge destination. Prospective studies are needed to validate best-practices in treating frail surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11935647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143719971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Concurrent Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients. 原发性Roux-en-Y胃旁路术并发食管旁疝修复肥胖患者。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00062
Daniel Knewitz, Jorge Cornejo Aguilar, Shalyn Fullerton, Lorna Evans, Steven Bowers, Enrique Elli

Background and objectives: Additional support for the safety and feasibility of combined paraesophageal hernia repair and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is needed. We sought to analyze both the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent this combined operation.

Methods: Single institution retrospective analysis of overall morbidity and mortality of patients who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with paraesophageal hernia repair from January 2014 to July 2023.

Results: Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean preoperative body mass index was 40 kg/m2. Most patients underwent a robotic approach. Six and three patients were noted to have minor and major postoperative complications, respectively. Ample comorbidity resolution and weight loss outcomes were noted. A robotic approach was associated with a significantly decreased operative time.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair with concurrent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a feasible and effective procedure, which leads to significant weight loss and associated comorbidity resolution. This simultaneous operation may be accomplished safely and potentially faster via a robotic approach.

背景和目的:合并食管旁疝修补术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的安全性和可行性需要更多支持。我们试图分析接受这种联合手术的患者的短期和长期疗效:方法:对2014年1月至2023年7月期间接受初级Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和食管旁疝修补术的患者的总体发病率和死亡率进行单机构回顾性分析:52名患者符合纳入标准。术前平均体重指数为 40 kg/m2。大多数患者接受了机器人手术。术后分别有6名和3名患者出现轻微和严重并发症。合并症和体重减轻的情况均有明显改善。机器人手术方法大大缩短了手术时间:结论:微创食管旁疝修补术同时进行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术是一种可行且有效的手术,可显著减轻体重并缓解相关并发症。这种同步手术可通过机器人方法安全、快速地完成。
{"title":"Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Concurrent Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients.","authors":"Daniel Knewitz, Jorge Cornejo Aguilar, Shalyn Fullerton, Lorna Evans, Steven Bowers, Enrique Elli","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00062","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Additional support for the safety and feasibility of combined paraesophageal hernia repair and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is needed. We sought to analyze both the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent this combined operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single institution retrospective analysis of overall morbidity and mortality of patients who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with paraesophageal hernia repair from January 2014 to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean preoperative body mass index was 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Most patients underwent a robotic approach. Six and three patients were noted to have minor and major postoperative complications, respectively. Ample comorbidity resolution and weight loss outcomes were noted. A robotic approach was associated with a significantly decreased operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair with concurrent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a feasible and effective procedure, which leads to significant weight loss and associated comorbidity resolution. This simultaneous operation may be accomplished safely and potentially faster via a robotic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sutureless "Slim-Mesh" Technique for the Repair of Abdominal-Wall Hernias in the Obese Population. 无缝线“细网”技术在肥胖人群腹壁疝修补中的应用。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00072
Silvio Alen Canton, Michele Valmasoni

Background and objectives: In 2009, we designed the sutureless "Slim-Mesh" laparoscopic technique to facilitate and promote repair of ventral hernias in the obese/superobese populations, including cases with large-giant/massive and multiple widely-spaced hernias. We also aimed to reduce surgical time and intra- and postoperative complications.

Methods: Cases were divided into Class I (body mass index [BMI] 30.0-34.9 kg/m2), II (35.0-39.9 kg/m2), III (40.0-49.9 kg/m2), and superobese (50.0-59.9 kg/m2). A ventral hernia was small-medium (∅ 2-9.9 cm), or large (∅ 10-14.9 cm)-giant (∅ 15-19.9 cm)/massive (∅ ≥ 20 cm). Between September 2009 and May 2023, 64 obese/superobese ventral-hernia patients were enrolled prospectively (81%)-retrospectively and treated with the Slim-Mesh technique.

Results: We operated on 35 males and 29 females. Mean age and BMI were 60 years old and 33 kg/m2, respectively. Class I cases numbered 48, II 13, III 2, with 1 superobese case. Small-medium, large-giant, and massive ventral hernias were found intraoperatively in 40, 21, and 3 cases, respectively. Mean surgical time for all cases was 104 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2 days and mean follow-up time was 5 years. We had 1 case of chronic abdominal-wall pain and 6 late postoperative-complications: 4 (6%) hernia recurrences, and 2 trocar-site hernias.

Conclusion: The sutureless "Slim-Mesh" technique implements the laparoscopic approach to repair ventral hernias in the obese/superobese populations rather than open surgery or traditional transfixation suture-based laparoscopy, including cases with large-giant/massive and multiple widely-spaced hernias. This study proves that "Slim-Mesh" is safe, straightforward, quick, easy-to-reproduce, and economical.

背景与目的:2009年,我们设计了无缝合线的“Slim-Mesh”腹腔镜技术,以促进和促进肥胖/超肥胖人群腹疝的修复,包括大-巨/块状疝和多发大间距疝。我们还旨在减少手术时间和手术内及术后并发症。方法:将病例分为I类(体重指数[BMI] 30.0 ~ 34.9 kg/m2)、II类(35.0 ~ 39.9 kg/m2)、III类(40.0 ~ 49.9 kg/m2)和超肥胖(50.0 ~ 59.9 kg/m2)。腹疝是中小型(∅2-9.9 cm)或大型(∅10-14.9 cm)-巨型(∅15-19.9 cm)/巨型(∅≥20 cm)。2009年9月至2023年5月,回顾性前瞻性纳入64例肥胖/超肥胖腹疝患者(81%),并采用Slim-Mesh技术进行治疗。结果:本组手术男性35例,女性29例。平均年龄为60岁,BMI为33 kg/m2。ⅰ类48例,ⅱ类13例,ⅲ类2例,超肥胖1例。术中发现小、中、大、巨、块状腹疝分别40例、21例、3例。所有病例的平均手术时间为104分钟。平均住院时间2天,平均随访时间5年。我们有1例慢性腹壁疼痛和6例晚期术后并发症:4例(6%)疝复发,2例套管针部位疝。结论:无缝线“Slim-Mesh”技术实现了腹腔镜下修复肥胖/超肥胖人群腹疝的方法,而不是开放手术或传统的经固定缝线腹腔镜,包括大-巨/块状疝和多发大间距疝。该研究证明了“Slim-Mesh”具有安全、直接、快速、易于复制和经济的特点。
{"title":"Sutureless \"Slim-Mesh\" Technique for the Repair of Abdominal-Wall Hernias in the Obese Population.","authors":"Silvio Alen Canton, Michele Valmasoni","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00072","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In 2009, we designed the sutureless \"Slim-Mesh\" laparoscopic technique to facilitate and promote repair of ventral hernias in the obese/superobese populations, including cases with large-giant/massive and multiple widely-spaced hernias. We also aimed to reduce surgical time and intra- and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases were divided into Class I (body mass index [BMI] 30.0-34.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), II (35.0-39.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), III (40.0-49.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and superobese (50.0-59.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). A ventral hernia was small-medium (∅ 2-9.9 cm), or large (∅ 10-14.9 cm)-giant (∅ 15-19.9 cm)/massive (∅ ≥ 20 cm). Between September 2009 and May 2023, 64 obese/superobese ventral-hernia patients were enrolled prospectively (81%)-retrospectively and treated with the Slim-Mesh technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We operated on 35 males and 29 females. Mean age and BMI were 60 years old and 33 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Class I cases numbered 48, II 13, III 2, with 1 superobese case. Small-medium, large-giant, and massive ventral hernias were found intraoperatively in 40, 21, and 3 cases, respectively. Mean surgical time for all cases was 104 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay was 2 days and mean follow-up time was 5 years. We had 1 case of chronic abdominal-wall pain and 6 late postoperative-complications: 4 (6%) hernia recurrences, and 2 trocar-site hernias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sutureless \"Slim-Mesh\" technique implements the laparoscopic approach to repair ventral hernias in the obese/superobese populations rather than open surgery or traditional transfixation suture-based laparoscopy, including cases with large-giant/massive and multiple widely-spaced hernias. This study proves that \"Slim-Mesh\" is safe, straightforward, quick, easy-to-reproduce, and economical.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143764043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Management of Inguinal Canal Fat Mass (Cord Lipoma) in Inguinal Hernia. 腹股沟疝腹股沟管脂肪团(脊髓脂肪瘤)的腹腔镜治疗。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00043
Abdullah D Aldohayan, Najla A Aldohayan, Fahad Y Bamehriz, Abdulaziz M Alnumay, Omar A Ababtain, Abdullah R Alzamil, Fares S Aldokhayel, Duaa S Alhumoudi, Nahlah A Aldahian

Background and objectives: Patients with an inguinal hernia usually report an inguinal bulge and pain. Inguinal canal fat can cause lower abdominal pain, swelling, and an inguinal hernia. Round ligament lipomas (RLLs) and inguinal cord lipomas (CLs) comprise invagination of extraperitoneal fat in the inguinal canal through the deep inguinal ring, with or without a hernia sac. During open surgery, The Inguinal canal fat mass (ICFM) previously labeled CL or RLL is usually excised and considered a CL, RLL, or inguinal canal lipoma. A lipoma is a benign tumor; therefore, it is not optimal to label inguinal fat as a lipoma. Moreover, lipoma incidence is 1 in 1,000; however, CL incidence is as high as 72.1%. During laparoscopy, it is difficult to observe the inguinal canal. CLs and RLLs can be missed during transabdominal preperitoneal and total extraperitoneal repair. We evaluated the importance of the anatomical identification and management of ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: All patients (n = 102; 93 male and 9 female patients) with an inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic examination and management of the ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL between May 2016 and May 2022 were included. All fatty mass of the inguinal were excised preserving the fat around the spermatic cord or round ligament.

Results: More inguinal fat was observed in female patients. After surgery, the patients' symptoms improved dramatically.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic retromuscular repair and exploration of the inguinal canal and excision of ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL are less likely to result in missed inguinal hernias and more likely to result in good outcomes and fewer postoperative complications.

背景和目的:腹股沟疝患者通常会报告腹股沟隆起和疼痛。腹股沟管脂肪可导致下腹疼痛、肿胀和腹股沟疝。圆韧带脂肪瘤(RLL)和腹股沟线脂肪瘤(CL)是腹膜外脂肪通过腹股沟深环侵入腹股沟管,伴有或不伴有疝囊。在开腹手术中,以前标为 CL 或 RLL 的腹股沟管脂肪肿块(ICFM)通常会被切除,并被视为 CL、RLL 或腹股沟管脂肪瘤。脂肪瘤是一种良性肿瘤,因此将腹股沟脂肪标注为脂肪瘤的做法并不可取。此外,脂肪瘤的发病率为千分之一,而 CL 的发病率却高达 72.1%。腹腔镜检查时很难观察到腹股沟管。经腹腹膜前和全腹膜外修补术可能会漏诊 CL 和 RLL。我们评估了腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中解剖学识别和处理 ICFM、先前标记的 CL 或 RLL 的重要性:方法:纳入2016年5月至2022年5月期间接受腹腔镜检查并处理ICFM、先前标记的CL或RLL的所有腹股沟疝患者(n = 102;男性患者93例,女性患者9例)。所有腹股沟脂肪块均被切除,保留了精索或圆韧带周围的脂肪:女性患者腹股沟脂肪较多。手术后,患者的症状明显改善:结论:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术、腹股沟管探查术和腹股沟脂肪瘤切除术(ICFM)、先前标记的CL或RLL不太可能导致腹股沟疝的漏诊,更有可能取得良好的疗效,减少术后并发症。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Management of Inguinal Canal Fat Mass (Cord Lipoma) in Inguinal Hernia.","authors":"Abdullah D Aldohayan, Najla A Aldohayan, Fahad Y Bamehriz, Abdulaziz M Alnumay, Omar A Ababtain, Abdullah R Alzamil, Fares S Aldokhayel, Duaa S Alhumoudi, Nahlah A Aldahian","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00043","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patients with an inguinal hernia usually report an inguinal bulge and pain. Inguinal canal fat can cause lower abdominal pain, swelling, and an inguinal hernia. Round ligament lipomas (RLLs) and inguinal cord lipomas (CLs) comprise invagination of extraperitoneal fat in the inguinal canal through the deep inguinal ring, with or without a hernia sac. During open surgery, The Inguinal canal fat mass (ICFM) previously labeled CL or RLL is usually excised and considered a CL, RLL, or inguinal canal lipoma. A lipoma is a benign tumor; therefore, it is not optimal to label inguinal fat as a lipoma. Moreover, lipoma incidence is 1 in 1,000; however, CL incidence is as high as 72.1%. During laparoscopy, it is difficult to observe the inguinal canal. CLs and RLLs can be missed during transabdominal preperitoneal and total extraperitoneal repair. We evaluated the importance of the anatomical identification and management of ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients (n = 102; 93 male and 9 female patients) with an inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic examination and management of the ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL between May 2016 and May 2022 were included. All fatty mass of the inguinal were excised preserving the fat around the spermatic cord or round ligament.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More inguinal fat was observed in female patients. After surgery, the patients' symptoms improved dramatically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic retromuscular repair and exploration of the inguinal canal and excision of ICFM, previously labeled CL or RLL are less likely to result in missed inguinal hernias and more likely to result in good outcomes and fewer postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nonabsorbable Polymeric Clips for Appendicular Stump Closure during Laparoscopic Appendectomy. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中用于阑尾残端闭合的不可取聚合物夹。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00056
Mohammed S Foula, Hassan Alsaleem, Ahmed Eldamati, Naser M Amer, Ali H Alsaffar, Hefzi Alratrout, Mohammed Sharroufna, Waleed A Elsayed, Hazem Zakaria

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of emergency surgical procedures performed worldwide. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained considerable popularity in the last decades. However, the ideal method for appendicular stump closure during LA is still debatable and depends on the surgeon's preference and intraoperative judgment. The endoloop ligatures (EL) is the most used method but its application is quite challenging. The efficacy of nonabsorbable polymeric clip (PC) has been proven and it was first described for appendicular stump closure in 2007.

Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients who underwent LA from January 2017 to the end of 2023 in a tertiary university hospital. Data were retrieved from their electronic medical files. The patients were classified into 2 groups. The appendicular stump was closed using EL, in the first group, and using PC, in the second group. The calculated operative time started from the patient's entry to the operating theatre till transfer to the recovery room.

Results: Out of 556 patients who underwent LA, 483 patients were included and classified into Group I (313 patients with EL), and Group II (170 patients with PC). Intraoperatively, complicated acute appendicitis was found in 27.8% and 36.5% and the median diameter of the appendix was reported 10 and 11.4 millimeters, respectively. The procedure was significantly shorter using PC (70 minutes vs 75 minutes, P = .03) and the cost was lower using PC ($42.6 vs $95.8). Intra-abdominal collection was reported in 1.6% and 0.6%, localized abscess was reported in 1% and 0.6%, and the hospital readmission rate was 3.19% and 1.18%, respectively.

Conclusion: The use of nonabsorbable PCs is safe and feasible for appendicular stump closure during LA for acute appendicitis.

背景:急性阑尾炎是全世界急诊外科手术中最常见的病因。在过去几十年中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)受到了广泛欢迎。然而,腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端闭合的理想方法仍有争议,这取决于外科医生的偏好和术中判断。内环结扎(EL)是最常用的方法,但其应用具有相当的挑战性。非吸收性聚合夹(PC)的疗效已得到证实,2007 年首次用于阑尾残端闭合:一项回顾性比较队列研究包括 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年底在一家三级大学医院接受 LA 手术的所有连续患者。数据取自患者的电子病历。患者被分为两组。第一组使用EL关闭阑尾残端,第二组使用PC关闭阑尾残端。计算的手术时间从患者进入手术室开始,直至转入恢复室:在556名接受LA手术的患者中,483名患者被纳入第一组(313名患者使用EL)和第二组(170名患者使用PC)。术中发现并发急性阑尾炎的比例分别为 27.8% 和 36.5%,阑尾的中位直径分别为 10 毫米和 11.4 毫米。使用 PC 的手术时间明显更短(70 分钟对 75 分钟,P = 0.03),费用也更低(42.6 美元对 95.8 美元)。腹腔积液报告率分别为1.6%和0.6%,局部脓肿报告率分别为1%和0.6%,再入院率分别为3.19%和1.18%:结论:在急性阑尾炎的LA手术中使用不可取PCs进行阑尾残端闭合是安全可行的。
{"title":"Nonabsorbable Polymeric Clips for Appendicular Stump Closure during Laparoscopic Appendectomy.","authors":"Mohammed S Foula, Hassan Alsaleem, Ahmed Eldamati, Naser M Amer, Ali H Alsaffar, Hefzi Alratrout, Mohammed Sharroufna, Waleed A Elsayed, Hazem Zakaria","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00056","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of emergency surgical procedures performed worldwide. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained considerable popularity in the last decades. However, the ideal method for appendicular stump closure during LA is still debatable and depends on the surgeon's preference and intraoperative judgment. The endoloop ligatures (EL) is the most used method but its application is quite challenging. The efficacy of nonabsorbable polymeric clip (PC) has been proven and it was first described for appendicular stump closure in 2007.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted including all consecutive patients who underwent LA from January 2017 to the end of 2023 in a tertiary university hospital. Data were retrieved from their electronic medical files. The patients were classified into 2 groups. The appendicular stump was closed using EL, in the first group, and using PC, in the second group. The calculated operative time started from the patient's entry to the operating theatre till transfer to the recovery room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 556 patients who underwent LA, 483 patients were included and classified into Group I (313 patients with EL), and Group II (170 patients with PC). Intraoperatively, complicated acute appendicitis was found in 27.8% and 36.5% and the median diameter of the appendix was reported 10 and 11.4 millimeters, respectively. The procedure was significantly shorter using PC (70 minutes vs 75 minutes, <i>P</i> = .03) and the cost was lower using PC ($42.6 vs $95.8). Intra-abdominal collection was reported in 1.6% and 0.6%, localized abscess was reported in 1% and 0.6%, and the hospital readmission rate was 3.19% and 1.18%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of nonabsorbable PCs is safe and feasible for appendicular stump closure during LA for acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143780354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retroperitoneoscopic Left Live Donor Nephrectomy. 腹膜后腔镜左侧活体供体肾切除术
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00036
Marwan Idrees, Zi Qin Ng, Melvyn Kuan, Lingjun Mou

Background: Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN) approach is an unfamiliar approach to the donor surgeons in Australia and New Zealand due to the background General Surgery training. The learning curve when transitioning from transperitoneal to retroperitonoscopic donor nephrectomy is relatively short with minimal morbidity.

Methods: We detail our standardized surgical approach for performing RDN, including technical tips and maneuvers as well as visual aids that ensure the procedure's safety and efficacy.

Discussion: RDN demonstrates notable advantages over traditional laparoscopic methods, including shorter operative times, less postoperative pain, and quicker recovery, thereby enhancing donor safety and graft function. Our goal is to outline our institution's RDN technique, offering valuable insights to aid donor surgeons in incorporating this method into their surgical repertoire. This approach requires a precise surgical technique and adequate training to maximize outcomes and minimize donor complications.

背景:后腹膜镜供肾切除术(RDN)入路对澳大利亚和新西兰的供肾外科医生来说是一种陌生的入路。从经腹膜到后腹膜镜下供体肾切除术的学习曲线相对较短,发病率最低。方法:我们详细介绍了实施RDN的标准化手术方法,包括技术提示和操作以及视觉辅助,以确保手术的安全性和有效性。讨论:RDN与传统腹腔镜方法相比具有明显的优势,包括手术时间更短,术后疼痛更少,恢复更快,从而提高供体安全性和移植物功能。我们的目标是概述我们机构的RDN技术,提供有价值的见解,以帮助供体外科医生将这种方法纳入他们的手术方案。这种方法需要精确的手术技术和充分的训练,以最大限度地提高结果和减少供体并发症。
{"title":"Retroperitoneoscopic Left Live Donor Nephrectomy.","authors":"Marwan Idrees, Zi Qin Ng, Melvyn Kuan, Lingjun Mou","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00036","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN) approach is an unfamiliar approach to the donor surgeons in Australia and New Zealand due to the background General Surgery training. The learning curve when transitioning from transperitoneal to retroperitonoscopic donor nephrectomy is relatively short with minimal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We detail our standardized surgical approach for performing RDN, including technical tips and maneuvers as well as visual aids that ensure the procedure's safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>RDN demonstrates notable advantages over traditional laparoscopic methods, including shorter operative times, less postoperative pain, and quicker recovery, thereby enhancing donor safety and graft function. Our goal is to outline our institution's RDN technique, offering valuable insights to aid donor surgeons in incorporating this method into their surgical repertoire. This approach requires a precise surgical technique and adequate training to maximize outcomes and minimize donor complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Efficacy and Postoperative Intervention. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术的比较结果:手术疗效和术后干预的回顾性分析。
IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00058
Veronika Stefanishina, Sushant B Remersu, Sabrina Elliott, Fnu Sreekanth, Rafael Fazylov, Simcha Pollack, Pratap K Gadangi, Thomas McIntyre, Silvio Ghirardo, Sreedhar Kallakuri, Muthukumar Muthusamy

Background: Subtotal cholecystectomy is employed when the hepatocystic triangle cannot be visualized, a surgical maneuver reserved for difficult gallbladders. The current literature compares an open versus laparoscopic approach with little discussion of robotic-assisted procedures. Although the robotic approach offers enhanced visualization and dexterity, its application in subtotal cholecystectomy remains underexplored. This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomies, focusing on postoperative complications and the learning curve associated with robotic surgery.

Methods: This study population included patients from July 2021 to June 2024 who underwent a subtotal cholecystectomy either laparoscopically or robotically with either fenestrated or reconstituted closure of the remaining biliary structures. A subtotal cholecystectomy was defined as a cholecystectomy with failure to control the cystic duct or view of the hepatocystic triangle of safety leading to at least 50% removal of the gallbladder body. Patients were categorized by their operative techniques: robotic or laparoscopic. The study variables included indication, age, gender, weight, operative variables, closure type, subsequent interventions, and other outcome data.

Results: In a retrospective analysis of 48 subtotal cholecystectomy cases performed between July 2021 and June 2024, 37.5% were robotic, and 62.5% were laparoscopic. Robotic procedures were more often associated with reconstituted closure (72.22%) compared to laparoscopic procedures, which used fenestrated closure (100%). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was significantly less frequent in the robotic group (11.1%) compared to the laparoscopic group (27.1%, P = .03). No patients in the reconstituted group needed postoperative ERCP, while 31.25% of fenestrated cases did (P = .004). Surgical duration and length of stay were comparable between the 2 techniques, challenging the notion of a steep learning curve for robotic surgery.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted subtotal cholecystectomy is a practical and potentially superior alternative to laparoscopic methods, particularly in reducing the need for postoperative interventions like ERCP. The findings support the broader adoption of robotics in challenging gallbladder surgeries. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are recommended to confirm these findings.

背景:当肝囊三角不能被看见时,采用胆囊次全切除术,这是一种为困难的胆囊保留的手术手法。目前的文献比较了开放和腹腔镜方法,很少讨论机器人辅助手术。尽管机器人方法提供了增强的可视化和灵活性,但其在胆囊次全切除术中的应用仍有待探索。本研究旨在比较机器人辅助胆囊次全切除术和腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术的结果,重点关注机器人手术的术后并发症和学习曲线。方法:该研究人群包括2021年7月至2024年6月期间接受腹腔镜或机器人胆囊次全切除术的患者,并对剩余胆道结构进行开窗或重建关闭。胆囊次全切除术被定义为胆囊切除术未能控制胆囊管或肝囊三角形的安全,导致至少50%的胆囊体切除。患者按手术技术分类:机器人或腹腔镜。研究变量包括适应证、年龄、性别、体重、手术变量、闭合类型、后续干预措施和其他结果数据。结果:回顾性分析2021年7月至2024年6月期间实施的48例胆囊次全切除术,其中37.5%为机器人手术,62.5%为腹腔镜手术。与使用开窗闭合的腹腔镜手术(100%)相比,机器人手术更常与重建闭合相关(72.22%)。术后内镜下逆行胆管造影(ERCP)在机器人组(11.1%)明显低于腹腔镜组(27.1%,P = 0.03)。重组组术后无需ERCP,而开窗组术后需要ERCP的患者占31.25% (P = 0.004)。两种技术的手术时间和住院时间相当,挑战了机器人手术学习曲线陡峭的概念。结论:机器人辅助胆囊次全切除术是一种实用的、潜在的、优于腹腔镜的替代方法,特别是在减少像ERCP这样的术后干预方面。研究结果支持机器人技术在具有挑战性的胆囊手术中的广泛应用。建议进行更多的多中心研究来证实这些发现。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Efficacy and Postoperative Intervention.","authors":"Veronika Stefanishina, Sushant B Remersu, Sabrina Elliott, Fnu Sreekanth, Rafael Fazylov, Simcha Pollack, Pratap K Gadangi, Thomas McIntyre, Silvio Ghirardo, Sreedhar Kallakuri, Muthukumar Muthusamy","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00058","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtotal cholecystectomy is employed when the hepatocystic triangle cannot be visualized, a surgical maneuver reserved for difficult gallbladders. The current literature compares an open versus laparoscopic approach with little discussion of robotic-assisted procedures. Although the robotic approach offers enhanced visualization and dexterity, its application in subtotal cholecystectomy remains underexplored. This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomies, focusing on postoperative complications and the learning curve associated with robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study population included patients from July 2021 to June 2024 who underwent a subtotal cholecystectomy either laparoscopically or robotically with either fenestrated or reconstituted closure of the remaining biliary structures. A subtotal cholecystectomy was defined as a cholecystectomy with failure to control the cystic duct or view of the hepatocystic triangle of safety leading to at least 50% removal of the gallbladder body. Patients were categorized by their operative techniques: robotic or laparoscopic. The study variables included indication, age, gender, weight, operative variables, closure type, subsequent interventions, and other outcome data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a retrospective analysis of 48 subtotal cholecystectomy cases performed between July 2021 and June 2024, 37.5% were robotic, and 62.5% were laparoscopic. Robotic procedures were more often associated with reconstituted closure (72.22%) compared to laparoscopic procedures, which used fenestrated closure (100%). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was significantly less frequent in the robotic group (11.1%) compared to the laparoscopic group (27.1%, <i>P</i> = .03). No patients in the reconstituted group needed postoperative ERCP, while 31.25% of fenestrated cases did (<i>P</i> = .004). Surgical duration and length of stay were comparable between the 2 techniques, challenging the notion of a steep learning curve for robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted subtotal cholecystectomy is a practical and potentially superior alternative to laparoscopic methods, particularly in reducing the need for postoperative interventions like ERCP. The findings support the broader adoption of robotics in challenging gallbladder surgeries. Further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are recommended to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949253/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1