首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Management of Staple Line Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. 腹腔镜袖式胃切除术后钉线渗漏的处理。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00029
Megan Parmer, Yun Hwa Walter Wang, Eliza H Hersh, Linda Zhang, Edward Chin, Scott Q Nguyen

Background and objectives: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become one of the most popular bariatric surgeries in the United States with a low rate of morbidity and effective weight loss. However, staple line leak remains a feared complication requiring a lengthy and difficult treatment course until resolution. This study outlines the various treatment methods used within a high-volume bariatric practice for successful leak resolution without necessitating a conversion procedure.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with staple line leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a three-surgeon bariatric practice from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.

Results: A total of 10 staple line leaks were identified with a leak rate of 0.9%. Patients presented on average 29.3 days postoperatively and were all diagnosed on computed tomography. Three patients were initially managed operatively with washout and drainage procedure. Six patients were managed endoscopically initially with either stent or over-the-scope clip placement. Most patients required multiple interventions with an average of 2.4 interventions per patient. Average time to leak resolution was 48.2 days (15-95 days).

Conclusion: Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy requires a multimodal approach usually requiring multiple interventions before leak resolution. We demonstrate effective utilization of varying interventions that lead to effective leak resolution and avoid conversion operations.

背景与目的:腹腔镜袖胃切除术已成为美国最流行的减肥手术之一,其发病率低,减肥效果好。然而,钉线泄漏仍然是一个可怕的并发症,需要漫长而困难的治疗过程,直到解决。本研究概述了在不需要转换程序的情况下,在大容量减肥实践中成功解决泄漏的各种处理方法。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日在三外科医生的减肥实践中腹腔镜袖胃切除术后发生钉线泄漏的所有患者。结果:共发现10例钉线漏缝,漏缝率为0.9%。患者术后平均29.3天就诊,均通过计算机断层扫描确诊。3例患者最初采用冲洗和引流手术治疗。6例患者最初采用内窥镜下支架或镜外夹置入。大多数患者需要多次干预,平均每位患者2.4次干预。平均泄漏解决时间为48.2天(15-95天)。结论:腹腔镜袖胃切除术后钉线渗漏的处理需要多模式的方法,通常需要多次干预才能解决渗漏。我们展示了有效利用各种干预措施,从而有效解决泄漏并避免转换操作。
{"title":"Management of Staple Line Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.","authors":"Megan Parmer,&nbsp;Yun Hwa Walter Wang,&nbsp;Eliza H Hersh,&nbsp;Linda Zhang,&nbsp;Edward Chin,&nbsp;Scott Q Nguyen","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become one of the most popular bariatric surgeries in the United States with a low rate of morbidity and effective weight loss. However, staple line leak remains a feared complication requiring a lengthy and difficult treatment course until resolution. This study outlines the various treatment methods used within a high-volume bariatric practice for successful leak resolution without necessitating a conversion procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with staple line leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a three-surgeon bariatric practice from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 staple line leaks were identified with a leak rate of 0.9%. Patients presented on average 29.3 days postoperatively and were all diagnosed on computed tomography. Three patients were initially managed operatively with washout and drainage procedure. Six patients were managed endoscopically initially with either stent or over-the-scope clip placement. Most patients required multiple interventions with an average of 2.4 interventions per patient. Average time to leak resolution was 48.2 days (15-95 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy requires a multimodal approach usually requiring multiple interventions before leak resolution. We demonstrate effective utilization of varying interventions that lead to effective leak resolution and avoid conversion operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/a5/e2022.00029.PMC9439287.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33447689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiple Endoclip Retraction Technique (MERT) in Laparoscopic Burch. 多腔内缩技术(MERT)在腹腔镜Burch中的应用。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00034
Mert Ali Karadag, Fatih Demir, Gokhan Sonmez, Murat Keske

Background and objectives: The multiple endoclip retraction technique (MERT) was developed based on our experience with suturing renal parenchyma in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In this study we prospectively evaluated the one-year results of cases treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic Burch with the MERT.

Methods: The patients were evaluated with stress test, one-hour pad test, and were requested to complete the International Continence Society Incontinence Questionnaire short form (ICIQ-SF) in the postoperative period. The follow-up periods were postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: The primary outcome of this study was surgical success, defined as being cured of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (no symptoms), experiencing improved symptoms of SUI in ICIQ-SF and negative stress test, and less than 2g urine leakage in a one-hour pad test.No statistically significant difference was found in terms of age, number of children, and body mass index (BMI) in patients according to the results of the 12 month postoperative stress test. We found statistically significant improvements at all control months in terms of stress test and pad weight. ICIQ-SF results showed a significant decrease at three months in patients who recovered after the operation. This rate has not changed in following control months. However, there was no statistical change in ICIQ-SF values in patients who did not recover after the operation.

Conclusion: MERT seems to be one of the safe and effective modifications in the management of SUI with good one year outcomes when performed by suitably trained experienced surgeons.

背景和目的:基于腹腔镜肾部分切除术中缝合肾实质的经验,我们开发了多重内缩技术(MERT)。在这项研究中,我们前瞻性地评估了经腹腔腹腔镜Burch与MERT治疗的病例一年的结果。方法:采用压力测试、1小时尿垫试验对患者进行评估,并要求患者在术后完成国际尿失禁学会尿失禁问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)。随访时间分别为术后3、6、12个月。结果:本研究的主要结局是手术成功,定义为治疗应激性尿失禁(SUI)(无症状),在ICIQ-SF和阴性应激试验中SUI症状改善,1小时尿垫试验中尿漏小于2g。术后12个月应激测试结果显示,两组患者年龄、子女数、体重指数(BMI)差异均无统计学意义。我们发现,在压力测试和垫重方面,在所有控制月份都有统计学上的显著改善。ICIQ-SF结果显示,术后恢复的患者在3个月时明显下降。这一比率在随后的控制月中没有变化。而术后未恢复患者ICIQ-SF值无统计学变化。结论:MERT似乎是一种安全有效的治疗SUI的方法,在经过适当培训的经验丰富的外科医生的操作下,一年的预后良好。
{"title":"Multiple Endoclip Retraction Technique (MERT) in Laparoscopic Burch.","authors":"Mert Ali Karadag,&nbsp;Fatih Demir,&nbsp;Gokhan Sonmez,&nbsp;Murat Keske","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The multiple endoclip retraction technique (MERT) was developed based on our experience with suturing renal parenchyma in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In this study we prospectively evaluated the one-year results of cases treated by transperitoneal laparoscopic Burch with the MERT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were evaluated with stress test, one-hour pad test, and were requested to complete the International Continence Society Incontinence Questionnaire short form (ICIQ-SF) in the postoperative period. The follow-up periods were postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome of this study was surgical success, defined as being cured of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (no symptoms), experiencing improved symptoms of SUI in ICIQ-SF and negative stress test, and less than 2g urine leakage in a one-hour pad test.No statistically significant difference was found in terms of age, number of children, and body mass index (BMI) in patients according to the results of the 12 month postoperative stress test. We found statistically significant improvements at all control months in terms of stress test and pad weight. ICIQ-SF results showed a significant decrease at three months in patients who recovered after the operation. This rate has not changed in following control months. However, there was no statistical change in ICIQ-SF values in patients who did not recover after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MERT seems to be one of the safe and effective modifications in the management of SUI with good one year outcomes when performed by suitably trained experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/a2/e2022.00034.PMC9439286.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33448598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Adverse Events and Utilization of Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery. 探讨手术中局部止血药物的不良事件和使用。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00033
Katherine A O'Hanlan, Paul Bassett

Background and objectives: This retrospective study provides preliminary qualitative assessment of the adverse events (AEs), focusing on pelvic and abdominal AEs and patient outcomes reported for three hemostatic agents used in gynecologic surgery.

Methods: Utilization rates for oxidized regenerated cellulose powder (ORC), polysaccharide powder (PSP), and fibrin sealant solution (FSS) were obtained from hospitals via the Premier Healthcare databases for all surgical procedures from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020. All reported cases were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for ORC and PSP and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for FSS. Distributions of AEs by anatomical site (MAUDE/FAERS) and surgical procedures by specialty (Premier) were evaluated for each product. Number of cases and number and types of AEs were compared to the total utilization for each product.

Results: PSP was the most used product during the period analyzed (n = 126,509 uses), followed by FSS (n = 80,628 uses), and ORC (n = 41,583 uses). Distribution of surgical procedures by anatomical site varied significantly between hemostatic agents (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with more patient cases with AEs and numbers of reported AEs compared with PSP and FSS (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with higher number of infections than PSP (p < 0.001) and FSS (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that ORC use in abdominal and pelvic surgery may result in more postoperative complications compared with non-ORC hemostatic agents. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare efficacy and safety of these products.

背景和目的:本回顾性研究对妇科手术中使用的三种止血药物的不良事件(ae)进行了初步定性评估,重点关注盆腔和腹部的不良事件以及患者的预后。方法:通过Premier Healthcare数据库获取2018年1月1日至2020年9月30日所有外科手术中各医院氧化再生纤维素粉(ORC)、多糖粉(PSP)和纤维蛋白密封液(FSS)的使用率。所有报告的病例均来自美国食品和药物管理局(FDA) ORC和PSP的制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库,以及FSS的FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库。根据解剖部位(MAUDE/FAERS)和手术方式(Premier)对每种产品的ae分布进行评估。将每个产品的病例数和ae的数量和类型与总利用率进行比较。结果:在分析期间,PSP是使用最多的产品(n = 126,509次),其次是FSS (n = 80,628次)和ORC (n = 41,583次)。不同止血药物的手术方式解剖部位分布差异显著(p)。结论:这些发现表明,与非ORC止血药物相比,ORC在腹部和骨盆手术中使用可能导致更多的术后并发症。需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来比较这些产品的疗效和安全性。
{"title":"Exploring Adverse Events and Utilization of Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery.","authors":"Katherine A O'Hanlan,&nbsp;Paul Bassett","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This retrospective study provides preliminary qualitative assessment of the adverse events (AEs), focusing on pelvic and abdominal AEs and patient outcomes reported for three hemostatic agents used in gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilization rates for oxidized regenerated cellulose powder (ORC), polysaccharide powder (PSP), and fibrin sealant solution (FSS) were obtained from hospitals via the Premier Healthcare databases for all surgical procedures from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020. All reported cases were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for ORC and PSP and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for FSS. Distributions of AEs by anatomical site (MAUDE/FAERS) and surgical procedures by specialty (Premier) were evaluated for each product. Number of cases and number and types of AEs were compared to the total utilization for each product.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSP was the most used product during the period analyzed (n = 126,509 uses), followed by FSS (n = 80,628 uses), and ORC (n = 41,583 uses). Distribution of surgical procedures by anatomical site varied significantly between hemostatic agents (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with more patient cases with AEs and numbers of reported AEs compared with PSP and FSS (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with higher number of infections than PSP (p < 0.001) and FSS (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that ORC use in abdominal and pelvic surgery may result in more postoperative complications compared with non-ORC hemostatic agents. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare efficacy and safety of these products.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/8c/e2022.00033.PMC9439288.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33450152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Improved Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost with Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Compared to Open Surgery. 与开放手术相比,微创结肠切除术降低了发病率、死亡率和成本。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00092
Hazim Hakmi, Leo Amodu, Patrizio Petrone, Shahidul Islam, Amir H Sohail, Michael Bourgoin, Toyooki Sonoda, Collin E M Brathwaite

Background and objectives: Despite the growth of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in many specialties, open colon surgery is still routinely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and costs between open colon and minimally invasive colon resections.

Methods: We analyzed outcomes between January 1, 2016 and December31, 2018 using the Vizient® clinical database. Demographics, hospital length of stay, readmissions, complications, mortality, and costs were compared between patients undergoing elective open and minimally invasive colon resections. For bivariate analysis, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and χ2 test was used for categorical variables. Multiple Logistic and Quintile regression were used for multivariable analyses.

Results: A total of 88,405 elective colon resections (open: 56,599; minimally invasive: 31,806) were reviewed. A significantly larger proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery were obese (body mass index > 30) compared to those undergoing open surgery (71.4% vs. 59.6%; p < 0.0001). As compared to minimally invasive colectomy, open colectomy patients had: a longer median length of stay [median (range): 7 (4-13) days vs. 4 (3 - 6) days, p < 0.0001], higher 30-day readmission rate [n = 8557 (15.1%) vs. 2815 (8.9%), p < 0.0001], higher mortality [n = 2590 (4.4%) vs. 107 (0.34%), p < 0.0001], and a higher total direct cost [median (range): $13,582 (9041-23,094) vs. $9013 (6748 - 12,649), p < 0.0001]. Multivariable models confirmed these findings.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive colon surgery has clear benefits in terms of length of stay, readmission rate, mortality and cost, and the routine use of open colon resection should be revaluated.

背景和目的:尽管微创手术(MIS)在许多专科有所发展,但开结肠手术仍然是常规手术。本研究的目的是比较开放结肠和微创结肠切除术的结果和费用。方法:我们使用Vizient®临床数据库分析2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日的结果。统计数据、住院时间、再入院、并发症、死亡率和费用在选择性开放和微创结肠切除术患者之间进行比较。双因素分析中,连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,分类变量采用χ2检验。采用多元逻辑回归和五分位回归进行多变量分析。结果:共88405例择期结肠切除术(开放:56599例;微创:31806例)。接受微创手术的患者中肥胖(体重指数> 30)的比例明显高于接受开放手术的患者(71.4% vs. 59.6%;结论:微创结肠手术在住院时间、再入院率、死亡率和费用方面均有明显的优势,应重新评估开结肠切除术的常规应用。
{"title":"Improved Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost with Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Compared to Open Surgery.","authors":"Hazim Hakmi,&nbsp;Leo Amodu,&nbsp;Patrizio Petrone,&nbsp;Shahidul Islam,&nbsp;Amir H Sohail,&nbsp;Michael Bourgoin,&nbsp;Toyooki Sonoda,&nbsp;Collin E M Brathwaite","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite the growth of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in many specialties, open colon surgery is still routinely performed. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and costs between open colon and minimally invasive colon resections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed outcomes between January 1, 2016 and December31, 2018 using the Vizient® clinical database. Demographics, hospital length of stay, readmissions, complications, mortality, and costs were compared between patients undergoing elective open and minimally invasive colon resections. For bivariate analysis, Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and χ<sup>2</sup> test was used for categorical variables. Multiple Logistic and Quintile regression were used for multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88,405 elective colon resections (open: 56,599; minimally invasive: 31,806) were reviewed. A significantly larger proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery were obese (body mass index > 30) compared to those undergoing open surgery (71.4% vs. 59.6%; p < 0.0001). As compared to minimally invasive colectomy, open colectomy patients had: a longer median length of stay [median (range): 7 (4-13) days vs. 4 (3 - 6) days, p < 0.0001], higher 30-day readmission rate [n = 8557 (15.1%) vs. 2815 (8.9%), p < 0.0001], higher mortality [n = 2590 (4.4%) vs. 107 (0.34%), p < 0.0001], and a higher total direct cost [median (range): $13,582 (9041-23,094) vs. $9013 (6748 - 12,649), p < 0.0001]. Multivariable models confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive colon surgery has clear benefits in terms of length of stay, readmission rate, mortality and cost, and the routine use of open colon resection should be revaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/90/e2021.00092.PMC9205462.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40492049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Robotic-Assisted Surgery for the Treatment of Breast and Cervical Cancers. 机器人辅助手术治疗乳腺癌和宫颈癌。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00014
John P Micha, Mark A Rettenmaier, Randy D Bohart, Bram H Goldstein

Background: Robotic-assisted surgery facilitates the performance of numerous, complex procedures, namely conferring precision, flexibility, and control that is otherwise unavailable with conventional laparoscopy; and compared to open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery is ostensibly associated with fewer complications, reduced intraoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay duration. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Food and Drug Administration have criticized the pervasive acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery, given the absence of randomized clinical trial data compared to traditional laparoscopy and open procedures, not to mention the increased surgical cost.

Conclusions: While the research data continue to be borne out, surgeons should exercise considerable discretion in selecting the surgical approach from which their patients would derive the greatest clinical benefit.

背景:机器人辅助手术促进了许多复杂手术的执行,即赋予传统腹腔镜无法获得的精确性、灵活性和控制性;与开放手术相比,机器人辅助手术表面上并发症更少,术中并发症减少,住院时间更短。然而,美国妇产科医师学会和食品药品监督管理局对机器人辅助手术的普遍接受提出了批评,因为与传统腹腔镜和开放式手术相比,缺乏随机临床试验数据,更不用说增加的手术成本。结论:虽然研究数据继续得到证实,但外科医生在选择手术入路时应行使相当大的自由裁量权,使患者从中获得最大的临床益处。
{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Surgery for the Treatment of Breast and Cervical Cancers.","authors":"John P Micha,&nbsp;Mark A Rettenmaier,&nbsp;Randy D Bohart,&nbsp;Bram H Goldstein","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted surgery facilitates the performance of numerous, complex procedures, namely conferring precision, flexibility, and control that is otherwise unavailable with conventional laparoscopy; and compared to open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery is ostensibly associated with fewer complications, reduced intraoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay duration. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Food and Drug Administration have criticized the pervasive acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery, given the absence of randomized clinical trial data compared to traditional laparoscopy and open procedures, not to mention the increased surgical cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the research data continue to be borne out, surgeons should exercise considerable discretion in selecting the surgical approach from which their patients would derive the greatest clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/94/e2022.00014.PMC9215693.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40510434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform. 达芬奇SP平台单端口机器人胆囊切除术的可行性和疗效。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00091
Wan-Joon Kim, Sae-Byeol Choi, Wan-Bae Kim

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, first introduced in 1995, features acceptable cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain control. The outcomes of single-port cholecystectomy by laparoscopy and robots were recently examined in many studies owing to surgeon and patient preference for minimally invasive surgery. A next-level da Vinci robotic platform was recently released. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) using the da Vinci SP® system.

Methods: In this retrospective observational single-center study, we analyzed the medical records of 304 patients who underwent RC between March 1, 2017 and May 31, 2021.

Results: Of the 304 patients, the da Vinci Xi® (Xi) was used in 159 and the da Vinci SP® (SP) was used in 145. The mean operation time was 45.7 mins in the SP group versus 49.8 mins in the Xi group. The mean docking time of the SP group was shorter than that of the Xi group (5.7 min vs 8.8 min; p = 0.024). The mean immediate postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) score was 4.0 in the SP group and 4.3 in the Xi group, showing a significant difference (p = 0.003). A separate analysis of only patients with acute cholecystitis treated with the da Vinci SP® showed that the immediate postoperative NRS score in the acute group was higher than that in the nonacute group.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated acceptable results of single-site cholecystectomy using da Vinci SP®. Thus, pure single-port RC using the da Vinci SP® for various benign gallbladder diseases may be an excellent treatment option.

背景:1995年首次引入的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有良好的美容效果和术后疼痛控制。由于外科医生和患者对微创手术的偏好,腹腔镜和机器人单孔胆囊切除术的结果最近在许多研究中得到了检验。下一个级别的达芬奇机器人平台最近发布了。本研究旨在评估使用达芬奇SP®系统进行机器人胆囊切除术(RC)的可行性和有效性。方法:在这项回顾性观察性单中心研究中,我们分析了2017年3月1日至2021年5月31日304例接受RC的患者的医疗记录。p = 0.024)。一项单独的分析显示,仅对接受达芬奇SP®治疗的急性胆囊炎患者,急性组的术后即时NRS评分高于非急性组。结论:本研究证明了达芬奇SP®单部位胆囊切除术的可接受结果。因此,使用达芬奇SP®的纯单端口RC治疗各种良性胆囊疾病可能是一种极好的治疗选择。
{"title":"Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform.","authors":"Wan-Joon Kim,&nbsp;Sae-Byeol Choi,&nbsp;Wan-Bae Kim","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, first introduced in 1995, features acceptable cosmetic outcomes and postoperative pain control. The outcomes of single-port cholecystectomy by laparoscopy and robots were recently examined in many studies owing to surgeon and patient preference for minimally invasive surgery. A next-level da Vinci robotic platform was recently released. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) using the da Vinci SP® system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational single-center study, we analyzed the medical records of 304 patients who underwent RC between March 1, 2017 and May 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 304 patients, the da Vinci Xi® (Xi) was used in 159 and the da Vinci SP® (SP) was used in 145. The mean operation time was 45.7 mins in the SP group versus 49.8 mins in the Xi group. The mean docking time of the SP group was shorter than that of the Xi group (5.7 min vs 8.8 min; p = 0.024). The mean immediate postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) score was 4.0 in the SP group and 4.3 in the Xi group, showing a significant difference (p = 0.003). A separate analysis of only patients with acute cholecystitis treated with the da Vinci SP® showed that the immediate postoperative NRS score in the acute group was higher than that in the nonacute group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated acceptable results of single-site cholecystectomy using da Vinci SP®. Thus, pure single-port RC using the da Vinci SP® for various benign gallbladder diseases may be an excellent treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/36/e2021.00091.PMC9205460.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40492511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Gastric Banding with Previous Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (Band over Pouch): Not Worth the Weight. 先前Roux-en-Y胃旁路的胃束带(胃束带覆盖胃袋):不值得这样的重量。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00010
Amir H Sohail, Raelina S Howell, Barbara M Brathwaite, Jeffrey Silverstein, Leo Amodu, Patricia Cherasard, Patrizio Petrone, Anirudha Goparaju, Jun Levine, Venkata Kella, Collin E M Brathwaite

Background and objectives: Revisional bariatric surgery continues to increase. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), known colloquially as "band-overpouch" has become an option despite a dearth of critically analyzed long-term data.

Methods: Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent band-overpouch at our Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Center of Excellence in a 18-year period ending October 31, 2021. We evaluated: demographics, comorbidities, operative procedures, and outcomes (30-day and > 30-day).

Results: During the study period, of 4,614 bariatric procedures performed, 42 were band-overpouch with 39 (93%) being women. Overall, mean age was 49.8 years (range 26-75), a mean weight 251 pounds (range 141-447), and mean body mass index 42.4 (range 26-62). Comorbidities included: hypertension (n = 31; 74%), diabetes (n = 27; 64%), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 26; 62%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 26; 62%), and osteoarthritis (n = 25; 60%). All procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversions to open. Mean length of stay was 1.2 days (range 1-3). Mean follow-up time was 4.2 years (range 0.5-11). Mean excess weight loss was 14.9%, 24.3%, and 28.2% at 6 months, 1 year and ≥ 3 years, respectively. There was one 30-day trocar-site hematoma requiring transfusion. Long-term events included: 1-year (1 endoscopy for retained food; 1 internal hernia), 3-year (1 LAGB erosion; 1 LAGB explant), 4-year (1 anastomotic ulcer), 6-year (1 LAGB explant and Roux-en-Y revision), and 8-year (1 LAGB erosion). One 5-year mortality occurred (2.4%), in association with hospitalization for chronic illness and malnutrition. Band erosions were successfully treated surgically without replacement.

Conclusion: Band-overpouch is associated with moderate excess weight loss and has good short-term safety outcomes.

背景和目的:矫正减肥手术持续增加。在之前的Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(RYGB)之后,腹腔镜可调节胃束带(LAGB),通常被称为“带包袋”,尽管缺乏经过严格分析的长期数据,但已成为一种选择。方法:我们前瞻性维护的数据库回顾性回顾了截至2021年10月31日的18年间,在我们的代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进卓越项目中心接受创面包袋手术的患者。我们评估:人口统计学、合并症、手术程序和结果(30天和> 30天)。结果:在研究期间,进行了4,614例减肥手术,42例为创可贴包袋,其中39例(93%)为女性。总体而言,平均年龄为49.8岁(范围为26-75),平均体重为251磅(范围为141-447),平均体重指数为42.4(范围为26-62)。合并症包括:高血压(n = 31;74%),糖尿病(n = 27;64%),阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(n = 26;62%)、胃食管反流病(n = 26;62%)和骨关节炎(n = 25;60%)。所有的手术均在腹腔镜下进行,没有转开。平均住院时间为1.2天(范围1-3)。平均随访时间4.2年(0.5 ~ 11年)。6个月、1年和≥3年的平均体重减轻率分别为14.9%、24.3%和28.2%。有一个30天的套管针部位血肿需要输血。长期事件包括:1年(1次内窥镜检查残留食物;1例内疝),3年(1例LAGB糜烂;1例LAGB外植体),4年(1例吻合口溃疡),6年(1例LAGB外植体和Roux-en-Y翻修),8年(1例LAGB糜烂)。1例5年死亡率(2.4%)与慢性疾病和营养不良住院有关。手术成功治疗了腕带糜烂,无需更换。结论:创可贴包袋术与中度体重减轻相关,具有良好的短期安全性。
{"title":"Gastric Banding with Previous Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (Band over Pouch): Not Worth the Weight.","authors":"Amir H Sohail,&nbsp;Raelina S Howell,&nbsp;Barbara M Brathwaite,&nbsp;Jeffrey Silverstein,&nbsp;Leo Amodu,&nbsp;Patricia Cherasard,&nbsp;Patrizio Petrone,&nbsp;Anirudha Goparaju,&nbsp;Jun Levine,&nbsp;Venkata Kella,&nbsp;Collin E M Brathwaite","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Revisional bariatric surgery continues to increase. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), known colloquially as \"band-overpouch\" has become an option despite a dearth of critically analyzed long-term data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent band-overpouch at our Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Center of Excellence in a 18-year period ending October 31, 2021. We evaluated: demographics, comorbidities, operative procedures, and outcomes (30-day and > 30-day).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, of 4,614 bariatric procedures performed, 42 were band-overpouch with 39 (93%) being women. Overall, mean age was 49.8 years (range 26-75), a mean weight 251 pounds (range 141-447), and mean body mass index 42.4 (range 26-62). Comorbidities included: hypertension (n = 31; 74%), diabetes (n = 27; 64%), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 26; 62%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 26; 62%), and osteoarthritis (n = 25; 60%). All procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversions to open. Mean length of stay was 1.2 days (range 1-3). Mean follow-up time was 4.2 years (range 0.5-11). Mean excess weight loss was 14.9%, 24.3%, and 28.2% at 6 months, 1 year and ≥ 3 years, respectively. There was one 30-day trocar-site hematoma requiring transfusion. Long-term events included: 1-year (1 endoscopy for retained food; 1 internal hernia), 3-year (1 LAGB erosion; 1 LAGB explant), 4-year (1 anastomotic ulcer), 6-year (1 LAGB explant and Roux-en-Y revision), and 8-year (1 LAGB erosion). One 5-year mortality occurred (2.4%), in association with hospitalization for chronic illness and malnutrition. Band erosions were successfully treated surgically without replacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Band-overpouch is associated with moderate excess weight loss and has good short-term safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/a7/e2022.00010.PMC9205461.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40491996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Using the da Vinci X® - System for Esophageal Surgery. 使用达芬奇X®系统食道手术。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00018
Juri Bergmann, Barbara Lehmann-Dorl, Lars Witt, Heiko Aselmann

Robotic esophageal surgery is becoming more widely adopted. Several publications on the feasibility, short-term outcomes and technical aspects are available. Most of these articles used either the da Vinci® SI system or in newer series the Xi System. The da Vinci® X system is generally considered less suited for multiquadrant access like in esophageal surgery, hence only limited data is available. Here we describe our initial experience with 16 Ivor-Lewis robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIE) in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The da Vinci® X system was installed in our department in 2019; the robotic program comprises colorectal, pancreatic and esophageal surgery. The first two patients were operated in the presence of a proctor. An operative standard was established including fluorescence angiography (Firefly®). Technical aspects with focus on the characteristics of the da Vinci® X system, operating room setup, and short-term outcomes are discussed.

机器人食管手术正被越来越广泛地采用。有几份关于可行性、短期成果和技术方面的出版物。da Vinci®X系统通常被认为不太适合食管手术等多象限通路,因此只有有限的数据可用。在这里,我们描述了16例Ivor-Lewis机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)治疗食管腺癌患者的初步经验。我们部门于2019年安装了达芬奇®X系统;机器人程序包括结肠直肠、胰腺和食道手术。前两名患者是在监考人员在场的情况下进行手术的。建立了包括荧光血管造影(Firefly®)在内的手术标准。技术方面的重点是达芬奇®X系统的特点,手术室设置和短期结果进行了讨论。
{"title":"Using the da Vinci X® - System for Esophageal Surgery.","authors":"Juri Bergmann,&nbsp;Barbara Lehmann-Dorl,&nbsp;Lars Witt,&nbsp;Heiko Aselmann","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic esophageal surgery is becoming more widely adopted. Several publications on the feasibility, short-term outcomes and technical aspects are available. Most of these articles used either the da Vinci® SI system or in newer series the Xi System. The da Vinci® X system is generally considered less suited for multiquadrant access like in esophageal surgery, hence only limited data is available. Here we describe our initial experience with 16 Ivor-Lewis robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIE) in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The da Vinci® X system was installed in our department in 2019; the robotic program comprises colorectal, pancreatic and esophageal surgery. The first two patients were operated in the presence of a proctor. An operative standard was established including fluorescence angiography (Firefly®). Technical aspects with focus on the characteristics of the da Vinci® X system, operating room setup, and short-term outcomes are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/78/e2022.00018.PMC9255263.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40491997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia. 在亚洲,腹腔镜阑尾切除术可以减少镇痛剂,更快地恢复工作。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006
Anil Dinkar Rao, Chung Boon Daryl Tan, Reyaz Moiz Singaporewalla Md

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is claimed to require less analgesic and allow for a faster return to work. This study examines whether these benefits hold true in Asian patient populations.

Methods: A retrospective audit of emergency appendectomies over one year was conducted to study outcomes of postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, and hospitalization leave (HL). A telephone questionnaire evaluated post-discharge analgesic intake, residual symptoms at follow-up, adequacy of HL and opinion on teleconsult reviews.

Results: Of the 201 patients, 187 (93%) underwent LA. Presurgery symptoms were significantly longer in the open appendectomy (OA) group (mean: OA 3.79, LA 1.81 days; p =0.026) which also had a higher frequency of perforation (71.4%). LA patients reported less pain compared to OA (LA 3.60 vs. OA 4.14; p =0.068) but were prescribed the same 2 weeks of analgesics as OA. LOS was significantly less for LA (mean LA 3.09, OA 6.93 days; p =0.006). Mean HL for LA and OA were 17.9 and 21.8 days respectively (p =0.05). Nearly 83% patients did not complete the prescribed course of analgesics and 47% patients felt that HL was more than adequate. Seventy-five percent of patients were asymptomatic at hospital follow-up and nearly 41% agreed to teleconsult reviews.

Conclusion: Majority of LA patients do not need 2 weeks of analgesics and their HL can be shortened for faster return to work thereby realizing the true benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Selected cases can be offered postoperative teleconsultation.

背景:腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)声称需要较少的止痛药,并允许更快地恢复工作。这项研究考察了这些益处是否适用于亚洲患者群体。方法:回顾性分析1年以上急诊阑尾切除术患者的术后疼痛、住院时间(LOS)、镇痛时间和住院天数(HL)。一份电话问卷评估出院后止痛药的摄入量、随访时的残留症状、HL的充分性和对远程会诊回顾的意见。结果:201例患者中,187例(93%)行LA。开腹阑尾切除术(OA)组术前症状明显延长(OA平均3.79天,LA平均1.81天;P = 0.026),穿孔发生率也较高(71.4%)。与OA相比,LA患者报告的疼痛更少(LA 3.60 vs OA 4.14;p = 0.068),但给予与OA相同的2周镇痛药。LA组的LOS显著小于LA组(平均LA 3.09, OA 6.93天;p = 0.006)。LA和OA的平均HL分别为17.9和21.8天(p = 0.05)。近83%的患者没有完成规定的镇痛疗程,47%的患者认为HL治疗绰绰有余。75%的患者在医院随访时无症状,近41%的患者同意进行远程咨询。结论:大多数LA患者不需要2周的镇痛药,其HL可以缩短,更快地恢复工作,从而实现微创手术的真正好处。选定病例可进行术后远程会诊。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.","authors":"Anil Dinkar Rao,&nbsp;Chung Boon Daryl Tan,&nbsp;Reyaz Moiz Singaporewalla Md","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is claimed to require less analgesic and allow for a faster return to work. This study examines whether these benefits hold true in Asian patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of emergency appendectomies over one year was conducted to study outcomes of postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, and hospitalization leave (HL). A telephone questionnaire evaluated post-discharge analgesic intake, residual symptoms at follow-up, adequacy of HL and opinion on teleconsult reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 201 patients, 187 (93%) underwent LA. Presurgery symptoms were significantly longer in the open appendectomy (OA) group (mean: OA 3.79, LA 1.81 days; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.026) which also had a higher frequency of perforation (71.4%). LA patients reported less pain compared to OA (LA 3.60 vs. OA 4.14; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.068) but were prescribed the same 2 weeks of analgesics as OA. LOS was significantly less for LA (mean LA 3.09, OA 6.93 days; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.006). Mean HL for LA and OA were 17.9 and 21.8 days respectively (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.05). Nearly 83% patients did not complete the prescribed course of analgesics and 47% patients felt that HL was more than adequate. Seventy-five percent of patients were asymptomatic at hospital follow-up and nearly 41% agreed to teleconsult reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of LA patients do not need 2 weeks of analgesics and their HL can be shortened for faster return to work thereby realizing the true benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Selected cases can be offered postoperative teleconsultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/fb/e2022.00006.PMC9215694.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40492515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Clinical Significance of Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis. 出血性胆囊炎的临床意义。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00030
Mirwais Khan Hotak, Mitali Fadia, Sivakumar Gananadha

Background: Hemorrhagic cholecystitis (HC) is a rare complication of acute cholecystitis. HC is difficult to diagnose pre-operatively and previous case reports suggest a strong association with anticoagulation and an increased morbidity. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with HC in a large cohort of patients.

Method: A retrospective review of HC patients diagnosed following review of the clinical and pathological database between January 1, 2000 - June 30, 2021 at two hospitals. A search of the histopathology database, patient medical records, laboratory results, and imaging was conducted.

Results: Thirty-five patients were diagnosed on the histopathology report from approximately 6458 patients who had cholecystectomies. Thirty-one had emergency presentation and four patients (11.4%) had elective surgery. Twenty-one patients (60%) were female and 15 patients (40%) were male. The median age was 51 years. All patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy, four patients were converted to open and five patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two patients (5.7%) were on anticoagulation therapy. Twenty-three (65.7%) had ultrasound, 12 patients (34.2%) had computed tomography, three patients (8.5%) had magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and one patient with a pre-operative diagnosis of HC.

Conclusion: HC is a rare form of acute cholecystitis. Anticoagulation only accounts for a small fraction of these patients. Pre-operative diagnosis of HC is not often made. Patients were treated with cholecystectomies and made a full recovery with no complications. Our study seems to show HC is a histological diagnosis with no clinical consequences for the patients.

背景:出血性胆囊炎(HC)是一种罕见的急性胆囊炎并发症。丙型肝炎术前诊断困难,以往的病例报告表明,丙型肝炎与抗凝治疗和发病率增加密切相关。该研究的目的是确定HC患者的临床表现和预后。方法:回顾性分析2000年1月1日至2021年6月30日在两家医院通过查阅临床和病理数据库诊断的HC患者。对组织病理学数据库、患者医疗记录、实验室结果和影像学进行了搜索。结果:在6458例胆囊切除术患者中,35例患者通过组织病理学报告得到诊断。31例急诊就诊,4例择期手术(11.4%)。女性21例(60%),男性15例(40%)。平均年龄为51岁。所有患者均行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,4例转为开腹,5例术后行内镜逆行胆管造影。2例患者(5.7%)接受抗凝治疗。超声23例(65.7%),ct 12例(34.2%),磁共振胆管造影3例(8.5%),术前诊断HC 1例。结论:HC是一种罕见的急性胆囊炎。抗凝治疗只占这些患者的一小部分。HC的术前诊断并不多见。患者接受胆囊切除术治疗,完全康复,无并发症。我们的研究似乎表明HC是一种组织学诊断,对患者没有临床后果。
{"title":"The Clinical Significance of Hemorrhagic Cholecystitis.","authors":"Mirwais Khan Hotak,&nbsp;Mitali Fadia,&nbsp;Sivakumar Gananadha","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemorrhagic cholecystitis (HC) is a rare complication of acute cholecystitis. HC is difficult to diagnose pre-operatively and previous case reports suggest a strong association with anticoagulation and an increased morbidity. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with HC in a large cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective review of HC patients diagnosed following review of the clinical and pathological database between January 1, 2000 - June 30, 2021 at two hospitals. A search of the histopathology database, patient medical records, laboratory results, and imaging was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients were diagnosed on the histopathology report from approximately 6458 patients who had cholecystectomies. Thirty-one had emergency presentation and four patients (11.4%) had elective surgery. Twenty-one patients (60%) were female and 15 patients (40%) were male. The median age was 51 years. All patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy, four patients were converted to open and five patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two patients (5.7%) were on anticoagulation therapy. Twenty-three (65.7%) had ultrasound, 12 patients (34.2%) had computed tomography, three patients (8.5%) had magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and one patient with a pre-operative diagnosis of HC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HC is a rare form of acute cholecystitis. Anticoagulation only accounts for a small fraction of these patients. Pre-operative diagnosis of HC is not often made. Patients were treated with cholecystectomies and made a full recovery with no complications. Our study seems to show HC is a histological diagnosis with no clinical consequences for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/17/e2022.00030.PMC9255261.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40492513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1