首页 > 最新文献

Local and Regional Anesthesia最新文献

英文 中文
Delayed Neurological Recovery After Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block: A Case Report [Letter]. 超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞后延迟神经恢复1例报告。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S260021
Chanchal Mangla, Joel Yarmush
{"title":"Delayed Neurological Recovery After Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block: A Case Report [Letter].","authors":"Chanchal Mangla, Joel Yarmush","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S260021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S260021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S260021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38083617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delayed Neurological Recovery After Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block: A Case Report. Ultrasound-Guided臂丛神经阻滞后延迟神经恢复1例报告。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-04-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S250989
Ninadini Shrestha, Bipin Karki, Megha Koirala, Santosh Acharya, Pramesh Sunder Shrestha, Subhash Prasad Acharya

Introduction: Brachial plexus blocks are frequently practiced and safe mode of anaesthsia. Although minor complications may occur, major complications are a rarity. However, we report a rare case of prolonged supraclavicular brachial plexus block which required almost 4 months to recover without a perceivable cause.

Case presentation: A 22-year-old gentleman posted for open reduction and internal fixation of both forearm bones was administered an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The intra-operative period was uneventful. However, the block persisted for a very prolonged period of time. All perceivable causes were ruled out. A total of 19 weeks was required for the entire block to regress with no residual neurological deficits thereafter.

Conclusion: Although peripheral neuropathies are known complications of peripheral nerve blocks, such a prolonged brachial plexus block is a rare event. The only plausible cause for the patient's condition could have been the prolonged drug effect; however, it has been rarely documented.

臂丛阻滞是常用且安全的麻醉方式。Although轻微并发症可能发生,严重并发症是罕见的。然而,我们报告一个罕见的病例延长锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞,需要近4个月的恢复没有明显的原因。病例介绍:一位22-year-old先生因前臂骨切开复位和内固定而接受ultrasound-guided锁骨上臂丛阻滞。术中一切顺利。然而,阻塞持续了很长一段时间。所有可察觉的原因都被排除了。总共需要19周的时间,整个街区才会恢复,此后没有残留的神经功能缺陷。结论:虽然周围神经病变是周围神经阻滞的并发症,但这种延长的臂丛神经阻滞是罕见的。造成病人病情的唯一合理原因可能是药物作用延长;然而,很少有文献记载。
{"title":"Delayed Neurological Recovery After Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block: A Case Report.","authors":"Ninadini Shrestha,&nbsp;Bipin Karki,&nbsp;Megha Koirala,&nbsp;Santosh Acharya,&nbsp;Pramesh Sunder Shrestha,&nbsp;Subhash Prasad Acharya","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S250989","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S250989","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brachial plexus blocks are frequently practiced and safe mode of anaesthsia. Although minor complications may occur, major complications are a rarity. However, we report a rare case of prolonged supraclavicular brachial plexus block which required almost 4 months to recover without a perceivable cause.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 22-year-old gentleman posted for open reduction and internal fixation of both forearm bones was administered an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The intra-operative period was uneventful. However, the block persisted for a very prolonged period of time. All perceivable causes were ruled out. A total of 19 weeks was required for the entire block to regress with no residual neurological deficits thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although peripheral neuropathies are known complications of peripheral nerve blocks, such a prolonged brachial plexus block is a rare event. The only plausible cause for the patient's condition could have been the prolonged drug effect; however, it has been rarely documented.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S250989","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37952320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Ankle Surgery in a Patient with Acute Subdural Hematoma Under Combined Lumbar Plexus and Proximal Sciatic Nerve Block - A Case Report. 踝关节手术治疗腰丛和坐骨神经近端联合阻滞下急性硬膜下血肿1例。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-04-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S247413
Utsav Acharya, Ritesh Lamsal

Acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is commonly encountered in the emergency department in patients with traumatic injuries. If the hematoma is small, non-expanding and asymptomatic, it is managed conservatively. However, other injuries sustained during trauma may warrant surgical intervention, during which anesthetic management becomes challenging. There have been reports of rebleeding in patients with aSDH after undergoing surgery under either general or spinal anesthesia. Here we present a case where ankle surgery for tri-malleolar fracture was successfully performed in a patient with traumatic aSDH under combined lumbar plexus and proximal (para-sacral) sciatic nerve block.

急性硬膜下血肿(aSDH)是常见于急诊科的创伤性损伤患者。如果血肿很小,不扩大且无症状,则应保守处理。然而,在创伤期间持续的其他损伤可能需要手术干预,在此期间麻醉管理变得具有挑战性。有报道称aSDH患者在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下接受手术后再出血。在此,我们报告一例外伤性aSDH患者在腰丛和近端(骶旁)坐骨神经联合阻滞下成功进行踝部手术治疗三踝骨折的病例。
{"title":"Ankle Surgery in a Patient with Acute Subdural Hematoma Under Combined Lumbar Plexus and Proximal Sciatic Nerve Block - A Case Report.","authors":"Utsav Acharya,&nbsp;Ritesh Lamsal","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S247413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S247413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) is commonly encountered in the emergency department in patients with traumatic injuries. If the hematoma is small, non-expanding and asymptomatic, it is managed conservatively. However, other injuries sustained during trauma may warrant surgical intervention, during which anesthetic management becomes challenging. There have been reports of rebleeding in patients with aSDH after undergoing surgery under either general or spinal anesthesia. Here we present a case where ankle surgery for tri-malleolar fracture was successfully performed in a patient with traumatic aSDH under combined lumbar plexus and proximal (para-sacral) sciatic nerve block.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S247413","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37882106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Efficacy of Oral Melatonin When Combined with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients with Bilateral Multiple Fracture Ribs. 口服褪黑素与胸硬膜外镇痛联合应用于双侧多发性肋骨骨折患者的安全性和有效性
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-04-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S244510
Ahmed M Fetouh Abdelrahman, Amany Faheem Abdel Salam Omara, Alaa Ali M Elzohry

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral melatonin administered with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients with multiple bilateral fractured ribs.

Patients and methods: A prospective, double-blind randomized control study was carried out on 80 patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II, aged above 18 years, presenting with multiple bilateral fractured ribs. They were randomly divided into two groups, 40 patients each. Placebo group patients received oral placebo tablets and melatonin group (TEA and melatonin) patients received oral melatonin tablets (5 mg), about 1 hour before epidural infusion of local anesthetics and then every 12 hours till the cessation of bupivacaine infusion.

Results: Melatonin administration was associated with a significant decrease in total morphine analgesia consumption, from 31.8 ± 1.41 mg in the TE group to 13.03 ± 0.85 mg in the melatonin group (P < 0.001), with a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the mean infusion rate of bupivacaine required for controlling the pain, from 0.17 ± 0.014 mL/kg/hour in the TE group to 0.12 ± 0.001 mL/kg/hour in the melatonin group. The duration of bupivacaine infusion in the melatonin group was also significantly shorter than in the TE group (96.48 ± 1.87 and 100.05 ± 3.39 hours, resp., P < 0.001).

Conclusion: We conclude that premedication of patients with 5 mg melatonin is associated with significant prolongation of thoracic epidural analgesic effects compared to placebo.

Registration: This clinical study was registered at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with no. "PACTR 201711002741378" on 02-11-2017.

研究背景本研究的目的是评估口服褪黑素并配合胸硬膜外镇痛对双侧多发性肋骨骨折患者的安全性和有效性:这项前瞻性双盲随机对照研究的对象是80名年龄在18岁以上、双侧多根肋骨骨折的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级男女患者。他们被随机分为两组,每组 40 人。安慰剂组患者口服安慰剂片剂,褪黑素组(三乙醇胺和褪黑素)患者在硬膜外注射局麻药前约 1 小时口服褪黑素片剂(5 毫克),然后每 12 小时注射一次,直至停止注射布比卡因:使用褪黑素后,吗啡镇痛剂的总消耗量显著减少,从 TE 组的 31.8 ± 1.41 毫克减少到褪黑素组的 13.03 ± 0.85 毫克(P 结论:褪黑素能显著减少吗啡镇痛剂的总消耗量:我们得出结论:与安慰剂相比,给患者使用5毫克褪黑素预处理可显著延长胸硬膜外镇痛效果:本临床研究已在泛非临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 "PACTR 2017110027"。"PACTR 201711002741378"。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Oral Melatonin When Combined with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients with Bilateral Multiple Fracture Ribs.","authors":"Ahmed M Fetouh Abdelrahman, Amany Faheem Abdel Salam Omara, Alaa Ali M Elzohry","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S244510","DOIUrl":"10.2147/LRA.S244510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral melatonin administered with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients with multiple bilateral fractured ribs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, double-blind randomized control study was carried out on 80 patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II, aged above 18 years, presenting with multiple bilateral fractured ribs. They were randomly divided into two groups, 40 patients each. Placebo group patients received oral placebo tablets and melatonin group (TEA and melatonin) patients received oral melatonin tablets (5 mg), about 1 hour before epidural infusion of local anesthetics and then every 12 hours till the cessation of bupivacaine infusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Melatonin administration was associated with a significant decrease in total morphine analgesia consumption, from 31.8 ± 1.41 mg in the TE group to 13.03 ± 0.85 mg in the melatonin group (P < 0.001), with a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the mean infusion rate of bupivacaine required for controlling the pain, from 0.17 ± 0.014 mL/kg/hour in the TE group to 0.12 ± 0.001 mL/kg/hour in the melatonin group. The duration of bupivacaine infusion in the melatonin group was also significantly shorter than in the TE group (96.48 ± 1.87 and 100.05 ± 3.39 hours, resp., P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that premedication of patients with 5 mg melatonin is associated with significant prolongation of thoracic epidural analgesic effects compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This clinical study was registered at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with no. \"PACTR 201711002741378\" on 02-11-2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/5a/lra-13-21.PMC7166071.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37877978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opioid-Free Cesarean Section with Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum Catheters. 双侧腰方肌导尿管下无阿片类药物剖宫产术。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-02-07 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S238026
Nadia Hernandez, Semhar J Ghebremichael, Sudipta Sen, Johanna B de Haan

Introduction: Post-operative pain control following cesarean section delivery (CD) is an important topic of discussion given the lack of consensus on a narcotic-sparing analgesic regimen. We describe the case of an elective CD with narcotic-free pain control using continuous bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum (QL) blockade as the primary mode of analgesia.

Case report: The patient is a 36-year-old female, G3P1, who presented at 37 weeks of gestation in active labor scheduled for elective primary CD. A spinal anesthetic was performed at L4-L5 with hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine, without intrathecal morphine. Bilateral posterior QL catheters were placed under sterile conditions with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side. Continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was then started at 10 mL/hour per side. The patient's pain was controlled with QL catheters and a multimodal pain regimen consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. The patient reported a resting pain score of 0 with a dynamic pain score of 3 out of 10 throughout her recovery. She was discharged on post-operative (post-op) day 3 and the catheters were removed without any complications.

Discussion: The gold standard for pain control following CD is intrathecal morphine; however, its use has many adverse effects. Bilateral single-shot QL blocks following CD have been proven to decrease opioid consumption but its limited duration has minimal advantage over intrathecal morphine and patients continue to require oral narcotics for analgesia. With the use of QL catheters and a multimodal pain regimen, it may be possible to achieve opioid-free CD for the post-op period.

引言:剖宫产术后疼痛控制是一个重要的讨论话题,因为对麻醉性镇痛方案缺乏共识。我们描述了一个选择性CD与麻醉无疼痛控制的情况下,使用连续双侧后腰方肌(QL)封锁作为镇痛的主要模式。病例报告:患者是一名36岁的女性,G3P1,在妊娠37周时出现活产,计划进行选择性原发性CD。在L4-L5行脊髓麻醉,高压0.75%布比卡因,未使用鞘内吗啡。双侧后置QL导管置于无菌条件下,每侧注射0.25%布比卡因20 mL。然后开始以每侧10ml /小时的速度持续输注0.2%罗哌卡因。患者的疼痛由QL导管和由非甾体抗炎药和对乙酰氨基酚组成的多模式疼痛方案控制。在整个康复过程中,患者的静息疼痛评分为0,动态疼痛评分为3分(满分10分)。术后第3天出院,导管拔除,无任何并发症。讨论:CD后疼痛控制的金标准是鞘内吗啡;然而,它的使用有许多不利影响。CD后双侧单次注射QL阻滞已被证明可以减少阿片类药物的消耗,但其有限的持续时间与鞘内吗啡相比优势很小,患者仍然需要口服麻醉品进行镇痛。通过使用QL导管和多模式疼痛方案,有可能在术后实现无阿片类药物的CD。
{"title":"Opioid-Free Cesarean Section with Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum Catheters.","authors":"Nadia Hernandez,&nbsp;Semhar J Ghebremichael,&nbsp;Sudipta Sen,&nbsp;Johanna B de Haan","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S238026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S238026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative pain control following cesarean section delivery (CD) is an important topic of discussion given the lack of consensus on a narcotic-sparing analgesic regimen. We describe the case of an elective CD with narcotic-free pain control using continuous bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum (QL) blockade as the primary mode of analgesia.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The patient is a 36-year-old female, G3P1, who presented at 37 weeks of gestation in active labor scheduled for elective primary CD. A spinal anesthetic was performed at L4-L5 with hyperbaric 0.75% bupivacaine, without intrathecal morphine. Bilateral posterior QL catheters were placed under sterile conditions with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side. Continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine was then started at 10 mL/hour per side. The patient's pain was controlled with QL catheters and a multimodal pain regimen consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. The patient reported a resting pain score of 0 with a dynamic pain score of 3 out of 10 throughout her recovery. She was discharged on post-operative (post-op) day 3 and the catheters were removed without any complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The gold standard for pain control following CD is intrathecal morphine; however, its use has many adverse effects. Bilateral single-shot QL blocks following CD have been proven to decrease opioid consumption but its limited duration has minimal advantage over intrathecal morphine and patients continue to require oral narcotics for analgesia. With the use of QL catheters and a multimodal pain regimen, it may be possible to achieve opioid-free CD for the post-op period.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S238026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37682414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Peripheral Neuropathic Pain and Pain Related to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome with and without Fixed Dystonia - Efficient Therapeutic Approach with Local Anesthetics. 伴有或不伴有固定肌张力障碍的周围神经性疼痛和与复杂区域疼痛综合征相关的疼痛——局部麻醉药的有效治疗方法。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S229315
Thomas Michels

Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (PNP) as well as the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), also known as "Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy", or "Sudeck Dystrophy", all of them have a poor prognosis. The numerous therapeutic offers are rarely accompanied by convincing success over a long duration of time. Even worse is the prognosis of a fixed dystonia which may develop in the extremities of PNP or CRPS patients. In literature a few cases are reported in which the often unbearable pain of those patients with or without a disabling dystonia disappeared immediately after the injection of local anesthetics (LAs) into the scars of a preceding trauma. This review evaluates publications concerning the neuropathological characteristics of fixed dystonia in PNP/CRPS patients and the electrophysiological processes of scar neuromas. The results of these evaluations support the understanding of the therapeutic successes and their immediate results reported above by the injection of LAs into triggering scars. Therapeutic options are discussed.

外周神经性疼痛(PNP)以及复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS),又称“反射性交感神经营养不良”或“Sudeck营养不良”,均预后较差。大量的治疗方案很少伴随着长期的令人信服的成功。更糟糕的是,固定肌张力障碍的预后可能发生在PNP或CRPS患者的四肢。在文献中报道了一些病例,这些患者有或没有致残性肌张力障碍,通常难以忍受的疼痛在向先前创伤的疤痕注射局麻药(LAs)后立即消失。本文综述了有关PNP/CRPS患者的固定肌张力障碍的神经病理特征和疤痕性神经瘤的电生理过程的出版物。这些评估的结果支持了上述通过将LAs注射到触发疤痕的治疗成功及其直接结果的理解。讨论了治疗方案。
{"title":"Peripheral Neuropathic Pain and Pain Related to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome with and without Fixed Dystonia - Efficient Therapeutic Approach with Local Anesthetics.","authors":"Thomas Michels","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S229315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S229315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (PNP) as well as the Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), also known as \"Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy\", or \"Sudeck Dystrophy\", all of them have a poor prognosis. The numerous therapeutic offers are rarely accompanied by convincing success over a long duration of time. Even worse is the prognosis of a fixed dystonia which may develop in the extremities of PNP or CRPS patients. In literature a few cases are reported in which the often unbearable pain of those patients with or without a disabling dystonia disappeared immediately after the injection of local anesthetics (LAs) into the scars of a preceding trauma. This review evaluates publications concerning the neuropathological characteristics of fixed dystonia in PNP/CRPS patients and the electrophysiological processes of scar neuromas. The results of these evaluations support the understanding of the therapeutic successes and their immediate results reported above by the injection of LAs into triggering scars. Therapeutic options are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S229315","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37678621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: Patient Selection and Special Considerations. 非手术室麻醉:患者选择和特殊考虑。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S181458
Timothy Wong, Paige L Georgiadis, Richard D Urman, Mitchell H Tsai

Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) represents a growing field of medicine with an increasing trend in the number of cases performed over the previous decade. As a result, anesthesia providers will need to enhance their familiarity with the resources, personnel, and environment outside of the operating room. Anesthesia delivery in NORA settings should be held with the same high-quality standards as that within the operating room. This review looks at special considerations in patient selection and the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. In addition, there is a discussion on the unique aspects of specific NORA areas and the considerations that come with them.

非手术室麻醉(NORA)代表了一个不断发展的医学领域,在过去的十年中,实施的病例数量呈增长趋势。因此,麻醉提供者需要加强对手术室外资源、人员和环境的熟悉。NORA环境下的麻醉交付应与手术室内的麻醉交付具有相同的高质量标准。这篇综述着眼于患者选择和术前、术中、术后时期的特殊考虑。此外,还讨论了NORA具体领域的独特方面以及随之而来的考虑。
{"title":"Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.","authors":"Timothy Wong,&nbsp;Paige L Georgiadis,&nbsp;Richard D Urman,&nbsp;Mitchell H Tsai","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S181458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S181458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) represents a growing field of medicine with an increasing trend in the number of cases performed over the previous decade. As a result, anesthesia providers will need to enhance their familiarity with the resources, personnel, and environment outside of the operating room. Anesthesia delivery in NORA settings should be held with the same high-quality standards as that within the operating room. This review looks at special considerations in patient selection and the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. In addition, there is a discussion on the unique aspects of specific NORA areas and the considerations that come with them.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S181458","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37611591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Anesthesia for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Tumor Ablation (PRFA): A Review of Current Practice and Techniques. 麻醉经皮射频肿瘤消融(PRFA):当前实践和技术的回顾。
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2019-12-04 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S185765
Federico Piccioni, Andrea Poli, Leah Carol Templeton, T Wesley Templeton, Marco Rispoli, Luigi Vetrugno, Domenico Santonastaso, Franco Valenza

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of solid tumors is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat primary or metastatic cancer lesions via needle targeted thermal energy transfer. Some of the most common tumor lesions treated using PRFA include those within the liver, lungs and kidneys. Additionally, bone, thyroid, and breast lesions can also be treated. In most cases, this procedure is performed outside of the operating room in a specialized radiology suite. As a result, the clinician must adapt in many cases to the specific environmental issues attendant to providing anesthesia outside the operating room, including the lack of availability of an anesthesia machine in some cases, and frequently a lack of adequate scavenging and other specialized monitoring and equipment. At this time, routine practice and anesthetic prescriptions for PRFA can vary widely, ranging from patients receiving local anesthesia alone, to monitored anesthesia care, to regional anesthesia, to combined regional and general anesthesia. The choice of anesthetic technique will depend on tumor location and practitioner experience. This review aims to summarize the current state of the art in terms of anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing PRFA of solid tumors.

实体瘤经皮射频消融(PRFA)是一种微创手术,用于治疗原发性或转移性癌症病变,通过针靶向热能转移。使用PRFA治疗的一些最常见的肿瘤病变包括肝、肺和肾内的肿瘤病变。此外,骨骼、甲状腺和乳房病变也可以治疗。在大多数情况下,这个过程是在手术室外的一个专门的放射套件中进行的。因此,在许多情况下,临床医生必须适应在手术室外提供麻醉的特定环境问题,包括在某些情况下缺乏麻醉机,并且经常缺乏足够的清除和其他专门的监测和设备。此时,PRFA的常规做法和麻醉处方可能差异很大,从单独接受局部麻醉到监测麻醉护理,再到区域麻醉,再到区域和全身联合麻醉。麻醉技术的选择取决于肿瘤的位置和医生的经验。这篇综述的目的是总结目前的状态,在麻醉技术方面,为患者接受实体瘤PRFA。
{"title":"Anesthesia for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Tumor Ablation (PRFA): A Review of Current Practice and Techniques.","authors":"Federico Piccioni,&nbsp;Andrea Poli,&nbsp;Leah Carol Templeton,&nbsp;T Wesley Templeton,&nbsp;Marco Rispoli,&nbsp;Luigi Vetrugno,&nbsp;Domenico Santonastaso,&nbsp;Franco Valenza","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S185765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S185765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of solid tumors is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat primary or metastatic cancer lesions via needle targeted thermal energy transfer. Some of the most common tumor lesions treated using PRFA include those within the liver, lungs and kidneys. Additionally, bone, thyroid, and breast lesions can also be treated. In most cases, this procedure is performed outside of the operating room in a specialized radiology suite. As a result, the clinician must adapt in many cases to the specific environmental issues attendant to providing anesthesia outside the operating room, including the lack of availability of an anesthesia machine in some cases, and frequently a lack of adequate scavenging and other specialized monitoring and equipment. At this time, routine practice and anesthetic prescriptions for PRFA can vary widely, ranging from patients receiving local anesthesia alone, to monitored anesthesia care, to regional anesthesia, to combined regional and general anesthesia. The choice of anesthetic technique will depend on tumor location and practitioner experience. This review aims to summarize the current state of the art in terms of anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing PRFA of solid tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S185765","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37446056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Using Chloroprocaine For Surgery Of Bilateral Radial Fractures [Letter] 氯普鲁卡因阻滞治疗双侧桡骨骨折[字母]
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2019-11-08 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s233411
Eva Hendriksen, C. Slagt
Department Anaesthesia, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, the Netherlands Dear editor With great interest we have read the article by Mangla et al recently published in Local and Regional Anaesthesia. In this article, they present the anaesthetic considerations of a trauma patient with bilateral radial fractures. Because of posttraumatic orofacial swelling combined with a sore throat after a previous anaesthesia, they anticipated a possible difficult airway. The patient was motivated for a bilateral brachial plexus anaesthesia combined with midazolam and propofol infusion. A infraclavicular block on the right and a supraclavicular block on the left were performed under ultrasound guidance. We would like to share our thoughts regarding this anaesthetic plan with respect to patient safety. Firstly, combining different local anaesthetics is common but their toxicity is additive. Calculating maximal doses becomes blurred. Blocks become unpredictable due to changes in pKa values and alterations in free fractions of these local anaesthetics. Secondly, when pulmonary complications are a real concern we suggest to perform a bilateral axillary block since there are no concerns regarding pulmonal failure (diaphragm palsy, pneumothorax). In combination with a skin ring block to address the intercostobrachial nerve, patients will have sufficient anaesthesia to tolerate a tourniquet (if needed). Third, Mangla et al performed a bilateral brachial block using bupivacaine 0.5%. Regarding LA toxicity, ropivacaine has largely replaced bupivacaine as the most commonly used long-acting local anaesthetic in peripheral nerve blockade. In equivalent doses, it produces less motor blockade compared to bupivacaine but an equally effective sensory block. Most important ropivacaine is less cardiotoxic compared to bupivacaine. The volume of LA that was given to perform the brachial blocks was 30–40mL. An increased volume will increase the spread of local anaesthetics, increasing the chance of blocking the phrenic nerve. Especially as 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% or low dose ropivacaine 0.375% is sufficient in a ultrasound guided supraclavicular block. Determining the anaesthetic plan is always a delicate balance between patient wishes, surgical options, surgical and/or anaesthesia risks. Anaesthesiologists should implement the plan that minimizes the risk to the patient.
内梅亨大学医学中心麻醉、疼痛和姑息医学系,奈梅亨,6500 HB,荷兰亲爱的编辑,我们怀着极大的兴趣阅读了Mangla等人最近发表在《局部和区域麻醉》上的文章。在这篇文章中,他们提出了麻醉的考虑创伤患者双侧桡骨骨折。由于创伤后的口面部肿胀和先前麻醉后的喉咙痛,他们预计可能会出现气道困难。患者接受双侧臂丛麻醉联合咪达唑仑和异丙酚输注。在超声引导下行右侧锁骨下阻滞术和左侧锁骨上阻滞术。我们想分享一下我们对麻醉计划的看法考虑到病人的安全。首先,不同局麻药联合使用是常见的,但其毒性是加性的。最大剂量的计算变得模糊。由于pKa值的变化和这些局部麻醉剂游离组分的改变,阻滞变得不可预测。其次,当肺部并发症是一个真正的担忧,我们建议进行双侧腋窝阻滞,因为没有担心肺衰竭(膈肌麻痹,气胸)。结合皮肤环阻滞处理肋间臂神经,患者将有足够的麻醉来耐受止血带(如果需要)。第三,Mangla等人使用0.5%布比卡因进行双侧臂丛阻滞。关于LA的毒性,罗哌卡因已在很大程度上取代布比卡因成为周围神经阻滞中最常用的长效局部麻醉剂。在同等剂量下,与布比卡因相比,它产生的运动阻断较少,但同样有效的感觉阻断。最重要的是,与布比卡因相比,罗哌卡因对心脏的毒性更小。用于肱动脉阻滞的LA体积为30-40mL。体积增加会增加局部麻醉剂的扩散,增加膈神经阻塞的机会。特别是20毫升0.75%的罗哌卡因或0.375%的低剂量罗哌卡因在超声引导下的锁骨上阻滞是足够的。确定麻醉方案总是在患者意愿、手术选择、手术和/或麻醉风险之间取得微妙的平衡。麻醉师应该执行使病人风险最小化的计划。
{"title":"Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Using Chloroprocaine For Surgery Of Bilateral Radial Fractures [Letter]","authors":"Eva Hendriksen, C. Slagt","doi":"10.2147/lra.s233411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/lra.s233411","url":null,"abstract":"Department Anaesthesia, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, the Netherlands Dear editor With great interest we have read the article by Mangla et al recently published in Local and Regional Anaesthesia. In this article, they present the anaesthetic considerations of a trauma patient with bilateral radial fractures. Because of posttraumatic orofacial swelling combined with a sore throat after a previous anaesthesia, they anticipated a possible difficult airway. The patient was motivated for a bilateral brachial plexus anaesthesia combined with midazolam and propofol infusion. A infraclavicular block on the right and a supraclavicular block on the left were performed under ultrasound guidance. We would like to share our thoughts regarding this anaesthetic plan with respect to patient safety. Firstly, combining different local anaesthetics is common but their toxicity is additive. Calculating maximal doses becomes blurred. Blocks become unpredictable due to changes in pKa values and alterations in free fractions of these local anaesthetics. Secondly, when pulmonary complications are a real concern we suggest to perform a bilateral axillary block since there are no concerns regarding pulmonal failure (diaphragm palsy, pneumothorax). In combination with a skin ring block to address the intercostobrachial nerve, patients will have sufficient anaesthesia to tolerate a tourniquet (if needed). Third, Mangla et al performed a bilateral brachial block using bupivacaine 0.5%. Regarding LA toxicity, ropivacaine has largely replaced bupivacaine as the most commonly used long-acting local anaesthetic in peripheral nerve blockade. In equivalent doses, it produces less motor blockade compared to bupivacaine but an equally effective sensory block. Most important ropivacaine is less cardiotoxic compared to bupivacaine. The volume of LA that was given to perform the brachial blocks was 30–40mL. An increased volume will increase the spread of local anaesthetics, increasing the chance of blocking the phrenic nerve. Especially as 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% or low dose ropivacaine 0.375% is sufficient in a ultrasound guided supraclavicular block. Determining the anaesthetic plan is always a delicate balance between patient wishes, surgical options, surgical and/or anaesthesia risks. Anaesthesiologists should implement the plan that minimizes the risk to the patient.","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/lra.s233411","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45529275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Using Chloroprocaine For Surgery Of Bilateral Radial Fractures [Response To Letter] 氯洛卡因用于双侧桡骨骨折手术的双侧臂丛阻滞[回复信函]
IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s238432
Chanchal Mangla, H. Kamath, J. Yarmush
Department of Anesthesiology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA Dear editor We would like to thank Dr Hendrickson et al for their interest in our work and writing about their opinion. We agree with the comment that mixing local anesthetics might make individual safe doses unknown, so maximum recommended doses of each local anesthetic should not be used. There are no human studies but it can be presumed to be additive based on some animal studies. We mixed local anesthetics in our patients so that we could decrease the volume of more toxic local anesthetics (Bupivacaine) by using some less toxic ones (like chloroprocaine). We also used doses of each local anesthetic of well below the recommended toxic doses and did spacing in our blocks to avoid toxicity. Though axillary blocks along with medial brachial cutaneous and intercostobrachial block can be used, we chose not to perform bilateral axillary blocks because it requires individual blockage of the terminal nerves which might lead to inadequate coverage, and also, performance of the block time and onset time is longer. Instead, we did infraclavicular block on one side, which greatly decreases the chances of phrenic nerve palsy. Dr Hendricken made a very good point of using ropivacaine instead of bupivacaine due to less toxicity, but unfortunately we do not have ropivacaine available at our institution. Lastly, smaller volume of local anesthetics can be used with the use of ultrasound for a successful block. We used 30 mL volume for each block, as we wanted to ensure complete coverage of surgical anesthesia and to avoid any supplementation/ deeper sedation or general anesthesia in case of an incomplete block. Also, our second block was more than two hours later, hence we avoided the overlap of peak plasma concentration of the local anesthetics from first and second blocks.
美国纽约布鲁克林纽约长老会布鲁克林卫理公会医院麻醉科尊敬的编辑,我们要感谢Hendrickson博士等人对我们的工作感兴趣,并撰写他们的意见。我们同意这样的评论,即混合局部麻醉剂可能会使个人的安全剂量未知,因此不应使用每种局部麻醉剂的最大推荐剂量。目前还没有人类研究,但根据一些动物研究,可以推测它是加性的。我们在患者身上混合了局部麻醉剂,这样我们就可以通过使用一些毒性较小的局部麻醉剂(如氯普鲁卡因)来减少毒性较大的局部麻醉剂的体积(布比卡因)。我们还使用了远低于推荐毒性剂量的每种局部麻醉剂的剂量,并在我们的区块中进行了间隔以避免毒性。虽然可以使用腋窝阻滞以及内侧臂皮肤和肋间臂阻滞,但我们选择不进行双侧腋窝阻滞,因为它需要单独阻断末端神经,这可能导致覆盖不足,而且阻滞时间和起效时间更长。相反,我们在一侧进行了锁骨下阻滞,这大大降低了膈神经麻痹的几率。Hendricken博士非常重视使用罗哌卡因代替布比卡因,因为毒性较小,但不幸的是,我们机构没有罗哌卡因。最后,较小体积的局部麻醉剂可以与超声波一起使用,以成功阻断。我们为每个阻滞使用了30mL的体积,因为我们希望确保手术麻醉的完全覆盖,并避免在阻滞不完全的情况下进行任何补充/更深的镇静或全身麻醉。此外,我们的第二次阻滞是在两个多小时后,因此我们避免了第一次和第二次局部麻醉剂峰值血浆浓度的重叠。
{"title":"Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Using Chloroprocaine For Surgery Of Bilateral Radial Fractures [Response To Letter]","authors":"Chanchal Mangla, H. Kamath, J. Yarmush","doi":"10.2147/lra.s238432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/lra.s238432","url":null,"abstract":"Department of Anesthesiology, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA Dear editor We would like to thank Dr Hendrickson et al for their interest in our work and writing about their opinion. We agree with the comment that mixing local anesthetics might make individual safe doses unknown, so maximum recommended doses of each local anesthetic should not be used. There are no human studies but it can be presumed to be additive based on some animal studies. We mixed local anesthetics in our patients so that we could decrease the volume of more toxic local anesthetics (Bupivacaine) by using some less toxic ones (like chloroprocaine). We also used doses of each local anesthetic of well below the recommended toxic doses and did spacing in our blocks to avoid toxicity. Though axillary blocks along with medial brachial cutaneous and intercostobrachial block can be used, we chose not to perform bilateral axillary blocks because it requires individual blockage of the terminal nerves which might lead to inadequate coverage, and also, performance of the block time and onset time is longer. Instead, we did infraclavicular block on one side, which greatly decreases the chances of phrenic nerve palsy. Dr Hendricken made a very good point of using ropivacaine instead of bupivacaine due to less toxicity, but unfortunately we do not have ropivacaine available at our institution. Lastly, smaller volume of local anesthetics can be used with the use of ultrasound for a successful block. We used 30 mL volume for each block, as we wanted to ensure complete coverage of surgical anesthesia and to avoid any supplementation/ deeper sedation or general anesthesia in case of an incomplete block. Also, our second block was more than two hours later, hence we avoided the overlap of peak plasma concentration of the local anesthetics from first and second blocks.","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/lra.s238432","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48507115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Local and Regional Anesthesia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1