{"title":"Correction To: Ebola Virus Disease Outbreaks: Lessons Learned From Past and Facing Future Challenges.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae328","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae328","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Caywin Zhuang, Mary A Driscoll, Brian C Lund
Introduction: This study reports rates of comorbid chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among U.S. military veterans and rates of psychiatric comorbidities among those with both chronic pain and PTSD.
Materials and methods: This study utilized National Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data to identify all veterans treated for chronic pain or PTSD in 2023. Multivariable logistic regression models determined the likelihood of each psychiatric comorbidity for those with chronic pain and PTSD relative to those with chronic pain only and separately to those with PTSD only, after adjusting for demographic variables and all other psychiatric comorbidities.
Results: Of the 5,846,453 service users of the VA in 2023, a total of 2,091,391 (35.8%) met the criteria for chronic pain and 850,191 (14.5%) met the criteria for PTSD. Furthermore, 21.6% of those with chronic pain also had PTSD and over half (53.2%) of those with PTSD also met the criteria for chronic pain (n = 452,113). Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD were significantly more likely to be women, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, and urban dwelling. Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD had significantly higher rates of all selected comorbidities relative to veterans with chronic pain only.
Conclusions: Patients with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD may benefit from tailored treatments to address the additive impact of these conditions.
{"title":"Comorbid Chronic Pain and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Current Rates and Psychiatric Comorbidities Among U.S. Military Veterans.","authors":"Katherine Hadlandsmyth, Caywin Zhuang, Mary A Driscoll, Brian C Lund","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae313","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study reports rates of comorbid chronic pain and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among U.S. military veterans and rates of psychiatric comorbidities among those with both chronic pain and PTSD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study utilized National Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data to identify all veterans treated for chronic pain or PTSD in 2023. Multivariable logistic regression models determined the likelihood of each psychiatric comorbidity for those with chronic pain and PTSD relative to those with chronic pain only and separately to those with PTSD only, after adjusting for demographic variables and all other psychiatric comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5,846,453 service users of the VA in 2023, a total of 2,091,391 (35.8%) met the criteria for chronic pain and 850,191 (14.5%) met the criteria for PTSD. Furthermore, 21.6% of those with chronic pain also had PTSD and over half (53.2%) of those with PTSD also met the criteria for chronic pain (n = 452,113). Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD were significantly more likely to be women, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latina, and urban dwelling. Veterans with chronic pain and PTSD had significantly higher rates of all selected comorbidities relative to veterans with chronic pain only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD may benefit from tailored treatments to address the additive impact of these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536323/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charlotte K Hughes, Michael J Eliason, Akihiro J Matsuoka
Mal de Débarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is a poorly understood vestibular disorder that frequently affects military personnel exposed to motion during transportation and deployment. It is characterized by a persistent sensation of motion often experienced after disembarking from a ship or other mode of transportation. It can significantly affect a service member's balance, coordination, attention, and focus, which can then substantially impact their quality of life, ability to perform their military duties, and overall mission readiness. Despite its potential impact, comprehensive studies on MdDS are scarce, especially within the military. The unique conditions of military service, including frequent travel, long flights, maritime deployments, and high-stress environments, make the military well suited to study MdDS. Increased awareness and understanding of MdDS is crucial for everyone in the military-from medical personnel responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of MdDS to commanders who must consider the operational impact of impaired personnel.
{"title":"The Hidden Enemy: Mal de Débarquement Syndrome and Its Impact on Military Operations.","authors":"Charlotte K Hughes, Michael J Eliason, Akihiro J Matsuoka","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usad449","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usad449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mal de Débarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is a poorly understood vestibular disorder that frequently affects military personnel exposed to motion during transportation and deployment. It is characterized by a persistent sensation of motion often experienced after disembarking from a ship or other mode of transportation. It can significantly affect a service member's balance, coordination, attention, and focus, which can then substantially impact their quality of life, ability to perform their military duties, and overall mission readiness. Despite its potential impact, comprehensive studies on MdDS are scarce, especially within the military. The unique conditions of military service, including frequent travel, long flights, maritime deployments, and high-stress environments, make the military well suited to study MdDS. Increased awareness and understanding of MdDS is crucial for everyone in the military-from medical personnel responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of MdDS to commanders who must consider the operational impact of impaired personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138176736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ying Chen, Andrew Leung, Yulia Wang, Nathan K Archer
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The U.S. Military members experiencing combat-related injuries have a higher chance of developing infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria at admission to military hospitals. MDR wound infections result in higher amputation rates and greater risks for subsequent or chronic infections that require readmission or extended stay in the hospital. Currently, there is no FDA-clear, deployable early diagnostic system for suitable field use.We are reporting our efforts to improve a previously developed Rapid Label-free Pathogen Identification (RAPID) system to detect viable MDR bacteria in wound infections and perform antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). Specifically, we added multiplex and automation capability and significantly simplified the sample preparation process. A functional prototype of the improved system was built, and its performance was validated using a variety of lab-prepared spiked samples and real-world samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To access the baseline performance of the improved RAPID system in detecting bacteria presence, we selected 17 isolates, most of them from blood or wound infections, and prepared mono-strain spiked samples at 104 to 106 cfu/mL concentration. These samples were processed and analyzed by the RAPID system. To demonstrate the AST capability of the system, we selected 6 strains against 6 different antibiotics and compared the results from the system with the ones from the gold standard method.To validate the system's performance with real-world samples, we first investigated its performance on 3 swab samples from epicutaneous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-exposed mouse model. The AST results from our system were compared with the ones from the gold standard method. All animal experiments were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. MO21M378). Then, we obtained swab samples from 7 atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and compared our AST results with the ones from the gold standard method. The human subject protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicines Institutional Review Boards (Study No. CR00043438/IRB00307926) and by USAMRDC (Proposal Log Number/Study Number 20000251).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-quality data were obtained from the spiked samples of all 17 strains. A quantitative analysis model built using these data achieved 94% accuracy in predicting the species ID in 8 unknown samples. The AST results on the spiked samples had shown 100% matching with the gold standard method. Our system successfully detects the presence/absence of viable bacteria in all 3 mouse and 7 AD patient swab samples. Our system shows 100% and 85.7% (6 out of 7) accuracy when compared to the oxacillin susceptibility testing results for the mouse and the AD patient swabs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our system has achieved excellent performance in detecting viable bacteria
{"title":"Optimization and Validation of an FTIR-based, All-in-one System for Viable MDR Bacteria Detection in Combat-related Wound Infection.","authors":"Ying Chen, Andrew Leung, Yulia Wang, Nathan K Archer","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae068","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The U.S. Military members experiencing combat-related injuries have a higher chance of developing infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria at admission to military hospitals. MDR wound infections result in higher amputation rates and greater risks for subsequent or chronic infections that require readmission or extended stay in the hospital. Currently, there is no FDA-clear, deployable early diagnostic system for suitable field use.We are reporting our efforts to improve a previously developed Rapid Label-free Pathogen Identification (RAPID) system to detect viable MDR bacteria in wound infections and perform antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). Specifically, we added multiplex and automation capability and significantly simplified the sample preparation process. A functional prototype of the improved system was built, and its performance was validated using a variety of lab-prepared spiked samples and real-world samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To access the baseline performance of the improved RAPID system in detecting bacteria presence, we selected 17 isolates, most of them from blood or wound infections, and prepared mono-strain spiked samples at 104 to 106 cfu/mL concentration. These samples were processed and analyzed by the RAPID system. To demonstrate the AST capability of the system, we selected 6 strains against 6 different antibiotics and compared the results from the system with the ones from the gold standard method.To validate the system's performance with real-world samples, we first investigated its performance on 3 swab samples from epicutaneous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-exposed mouse model. The AST results from our system were compared with the ones from the gold standard method. All animal experiments were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. MO21M378). Then, we obtained swab samples from 7 atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and compared our AST results with the ones from the gold standard method. The human subject protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicines Institutional Review Boards (Study No. CR00043438/IRB00307926) and by USAMRDC (Proposal Log Number/Study Number 20000251).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-quality data were obtained from the spiked samples of all 17 strains. A quantitative analysis model built using these data achieved 94% accuracy in predicting the species ID in 8 unknown samples. The AST results on the spiked samples had shown 100% matching with the gold standard method. Our system successfully detects the presence/absence of viable bacteria in all 3 mouse and 7 AD patient swab samples. Our system shows 100% and 85.7% (6 out of 7) accuracy when compared to the oxacillin susceptibility testing results for the mouse and the AD patient swabs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our system has achieved excellent performance in detecting viable bacteria ","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140184882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military service members (SMs) are exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in combat and training that are purported to adversely affect brain health, including cognition, behavior, and function. Researchers have reported that RHI from blast-related exposure may affect both vestibular and ocular function, which in turn may be related to symptomology. As such, an examination of the effects of RHI on exposed military SMs should incorporate these domains. To date, researchers have not compared groups of exposed special operations forces (SOF) operators on combined clinical vestibular/ocular and eye-tracker-based outcomes. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare participant-reported symptoms and performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with performance on the computerized RightEye tracking system between SOF operators exposed to blast-related RHI and healthy controls without blast-related exposure. In addition, the study aimed to compare subgroups of snipers and breachers exposed to RHI to controls on the preceding metrics, as well as identify a subset of individual (demographic) factors, participant-reported symptoms, and performance metrics on VOMS and RightEye that best identify SOF operators exposed to RHI from unexposed controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved a cross-sectional design including 25 Canadian SOF SMs comprised of breachers (n = 9), snipers (n = 9), and healthy, unexposed controls (n = 7). The former 2 groups were combined into an RHI group (n = 18) and compared to controls (n = 7). Participants provided demographics and completed a self-reported concussion-related symptom report via the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2, the VOMS, and RightEye computerized eye-tracking assessments. Independent samples t-tests and ANOVAs were used to compare the groups on the outcomes, with receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to identify predictors of blast exposure. This study was approved by the Defence Research Development Canada Human Research Ethics Committee and the Canadian Forces Surgeon General/Special Forces Command.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from t-tests supported group differences for age (P = .012), participant-reported symptoms (P = .006), and all VOMS items (P range = <.001-.02), with the RHI group being higher than healthy controls on all variables. ANOVA results supported group differences among snipers, breachers, and controls for age (P = .01), RightEye saccades (P = .04), participant-reported total symptom severity (P = .03), and VOMS total scores (P = .003). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses supported age (AUC = 0.81), Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 participant-reported total symptom severity (AUC = 0.87), and VOMS total scores (AUC = 0.92) as significant predictors of prior blast exposure.</p><p><strong>Concl
{"title":"Comparison of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and Computerized Eye-tracking to Identify Exposure to Repetitive Head Impacts.","authors":"Anthony P Kontos, Aaron J Zynda, Amir Minerbi","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae065","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military service members (SMs) are exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in combat and training that are purported to adversely affect brain health, including cognition, behavior, and function. Researchers have reported that RHI from blast-related exposure may affect both vestibular and ocular function, which in turn may be related to symptomology. As such, an examination of the effects of RHI on exposed military SMs should incorporate these domains. To date, researchers have not compared groups of exposed special operations forces (SOF) operators on combined clinical vestibular/ocular and eye-tracker-based outcomes. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare participant-reported symptoms and performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with performance on the computerized RightEye tracking system between SOF operators exposed to blast-related RHI and healthy controls without blast-related exposure. In addition, the study aimed to compare subgroups of snipers and breachers exposed to RHI to controls on the preceding metrics, as well as identify a subset of individual (demographic) factors, participant-reported symptoms, and performance metrics on VOMS and RightEye that best identify SOF operators exposed to RHI from unexposed controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved a cross-sectional design including 25 Canadian SOF SMs comprised of breachers (n = 9), snipers (n = 9), and healthy, unexposed controls (n = 7). The former 2 groups were combined into an RHI group (n = 18) and compared to controls (n = 7). Participants provided demographics and completed a self-reported concussion-related symptom report via the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2, the VOMS, and RightEye computerized eye-tracking assessments. Independent samples t-tests and ANOVAs were used to compare the groups on the outcomes, with receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to identify predictors of blast exposure. This study was approved by the Defence Research Development Canada Human Research Ethics Committee and the Canadian Forces Surgeon General/Special Forces Command.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from t-tests supported group differences for age (P = .012), participant-reported symptoms (P = .006), and all VOMS items (P range = <.001-.02), with the RHI group being higher than healthy controls on all variables. ANOVA results supported group differences among snipers, breachers, and controls for age (P = .01), RightEye saccades (P = .04), participant-reported total symptom severity (P = .03), and VOMS total scores (P = .003). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses supported age (AUC = 0.81), Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 participant-reported total symptom severity (AUC = 0.87), and VOMS total scores (AUC = 0.92) as significant predictors of prior blast exposure.</p><p><strong>Concl","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Binny Chokshi, Sidney Zven, Rachel Burris, Meaghan Wido, Elizabeth Hisle-Gorman
Introduction: One in four U.S. service members endorses food insecurity. The Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is an invaluable, underutilized resource that can increase access to nutritious food for families with children under 5 years of age. Our research sought to evaluate military family perceptions and engagement with the WIC program.
Materials and methods: We conducted a mixed-method study, recruiting from a convenience sample of military families who applied for financial assistance for child care. An 18-question survey and follow-up focus groups assessed participant demographics and experiences with WIC. We utilized descriptive statistics ordinal logistic regression analyses for quantitative data analysis. For qualitative data, descriptive content analysis with constant comparison and inductive and deductive coding of interviews identified emerging themes. This study was approved by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.
Results: Among the 399 survey respondents, 25% were currently enrolled in WIC and 39% had been previously enrolled. Service members and their partners learned about WIC from a variety of sources, and there was no significant association between the branch of service or rank and WIC enrollment. There were 40 total participants in 10 completed focus groups. Six themes emerged: (1) Military-specific factors create unique circumstances related to WIC engagement; (2) the WIC program facilitates access to formula supplementation and nutritious foods for military families; (3) lack of program awareness and misinformation are top barriers to WIC engagement in military families; (4) stigma impacts WIC program enrollment and engagement; (5) logistics of enrollment can impact WIC engagement among military families; and (6) the military can support WIC enrollment and engagement through standardization, education, and leadership commitment.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that unique circumstances related to military family life create a profound need for programs addressing food support, such as WIC. Interventions to improve WIC enrollment among military families need to be rooted in broad outreach efforts, not targeted at specific ranks, branches, or ages. Specific recommendations include increasing information dissemination, universally screening military families for WIC, decreasing logistical burdens, and involving military leadership.
{"title":"Military Family Perspectives on Enrollment and Engagement in the WIC Program.","authors":"Binny Chokshi, Sidney Zven, Rachel Burris, Meaghan Wido, Elizabeth Hisle-Gorman","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae192","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One in four U.S. service members endorses food insecurity. The Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is an invaluable, underutilized resource that can increase access to nutritious food for families with children under 5 years of age. Our research sought to evaluate military family perceptions and engagement with the WIC program.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-method study, recruiting from a convenience sample of military families who applied for financial assistance for child care. An 18-question survey and follow-up focus groups assessed participant demographics and experiences with WIC. We utilized descriptive statistics ordinal logistic regression analyses for quantitative data analysis. For qualitative data, descriptive content analysis with constant comparison and inductive and deductive coding of interviews identified emerging themes. This study was approved by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 399 survey respondents, 25% were currently enrolled in WIC and 39% had been previously enrolled. Service members and their partners learned about WIC from a variety of sources, and there was no significant association between the branch of service or rank and WIC enrollment. There were 40 total participants in 10 completed focus groups. Six themes emerged: (1) Military-specific factors create unique circumstances related to WIC engagement; (2) the WIC program facilitates access to formula supplementation and nutritious foods for military families; (3) lack of program awareness and misinformation are top barriers to WIC engagement in military families; (4) stigma impacts WIC program enrollment and engagement; (5) logistics of enrollment can impact WIC engagement among military families; and (6) the military can support WIC enrollment and engagement through standardization, education, and leadership commitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that unique circumstances related to military family life create a profound need for programs addressing food support, such as WIC. Interventions to improve WIC enrollment among military families need to be rooted in broad outreach efforts, not targeted at specific ranks, branches, or ages. Specific recommendations include increasing information dissemination, universally screening military families for WIC, decreasing logistical burdens, and involving military leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140922655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Holly B Herberman Mash, Carol S Fullerton, Amy B Adler, Joshua C Morganstein, Dori B Reissman, Quinn M Biggs, Christina L La Croix, Alexandra Blumhorst, Robert J Ursano
Introduction: The National Guard (NG) served as a critical component of the U.S. response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Understanding the impact of types of pandemic-related disaster work on mental health responses can aid in sustaining NG service members' health and preparation for subsequent activations and future pandemics.
Materials and methods: We surveyed 1,363 NG unit (NGU) service members (88% Army; 80% enlisted; 32% 30 to 39 years old; 84% male) following activation in response to the pandemic. Surveys were administered between August and December 2020, which was approximately 2 to 3 months post-activation. Surveys assessed overall activation stress, participation in different types of disaster work, probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depression, and anger. A disaster work stress scale assessed different types of disaster work during activation and associated stress levels. For each individual, we calculated an overall work task stress (WTS) scaled score, with a maximum score of 100. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of high-stress disaster work tasks to post-activation PTSD, anxiety and depression, and anger, adjusting for socio-demographic and service-related variables. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University (USU) in Bethesda, MD.
Results: Among NGU service members, 12.7% (n = 172) described their activation as very/extremely stressful. The work tasks with the highest scaled scores were as follows: (1) Patient transportation (WTS scaled score = 100); (2) working with the dead (WTS = 82.2); and (3) working with families of coronavirus disease 2019 patients (WTS = 72.7). For each individual's work tasks, we identified the work task associated with the highest WTS score. The top one-third of WTS scores were classified as the high-stress group. Approximately 9% of participants (n = 111) had probable PTSD, 6.7% (n = 85) had clinically significant anxiety and depression, and 12.3% (n = 156) had high anger. Multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for covariates, found that NGU service members exposed to the highest level of disaster WTS were more likely to report PTSD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.94], χ2 = 7.98), anxiety and depression (OR = 1.91 [95% CI = 1.17-3.13]; χ2 = 6.67), and anger (OR = 1.63 [95% CI = 1.13-2.37]; χ2 = 6.66) post-activation.
Conclusions: Identifying work tasks associated with high levels of stress can help detect individuals at risk for adverse mental health responses post-exposure. Distinguishing features of high-stress work conditions can be generalized to other types of work conditions and disaster response and are important targets for planning and preventive efforts.
{"title":"Types of COVID-19 Disaster Work and Psychological Responses in National Guard Service Members.","authors":"Holly B Herberman Mash, Carol S Fullerton, Amy B Adler, Joshua C Morganstein, Dori B Reissman, Quinn M Biggs, Christina L La Croix, Alexandra Blumhorst, Robert J Ursano","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae228","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The National Guard (NG) served as a critical component of the U.S. response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Understanding the impact of types of pandemic-related disaster work on mental health responses can aid in sustaining NG service members' health and preparation for subsequent activations and future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We surveyed 1,363 NG unit (NGU) service members (88% Army; 80% enlisted; 32% 30 to 39 years old; 84% male) following activation in response to the pandemic. Surveys were administered between August and December 2020, which was approximately 2 to 3 months post-activation. Surveys assessed overall activation stress, participation in different types of disaster work, probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and depression, and anger. A disaster work stress scale assessed different types of disaster work during activation and associated stress levels. For each individual, we calculated an overall work task stress (WTS) scaled score, with a maximum score of 100. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of high-stress disaster work tasks to post-activation PTSD, anxiety and depression, and anger, adjusting for socio-demographic and service-related variables. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University (USU) in Bethesda, MD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among NGU service members, 12.7% (n = 172) described their activation as very/extremely stressful. The work tasks with the highest scaled scores were as follows: (1) Patient transportation (WTS scaled score = 100); (2) working with the dead (WTS = 82.2); and (3) working with families of coronavirus disease 2019 patients (WTS = 72.7). For each individual's work tasks, we identified the work task associated with the highest WTS score. The top one-third of WTS scores were classified as the high-stress group. Approximately 9% of participants (n = 111) had probable PTSD, 6.7% (n = 85) had clinically significant anxiety and depression, and 12.3% (n = 156) had high anger. Multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for covariates, found that NGU service members exposed to the highest level of disaster WTS were more likely to report PTSD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.94], χ2 = 7.98), anxiety and depression (OR = 1.91 [95% CI = 1.17-3.13]; χ2 = 6.67), and anger (OR = 1.63 [95% CI = 1.13-2.37]; χ2 = 6.66) post-activation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identifying work tasks associated with high levels of stress can help detect individuals at risk for adverse mental health responses post-exposure. Distinguishing features of high-stress work conditions can be generalized to other types of work conditions and disaster response and are important targets for planning and preventive efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140958478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebekah Cole, Kaitlin Zurbrugg, Yen Lee, Ting Dong, Jessica Bunin, Guinevere Granite, Amber Barak, Sherri L Rudinsky
Introduction: Mentorship is essential for professional development and advancement within the military. In civilian medicine, the intersection between gender and mentorship holds important implications for research opportunities, academic success, and career progression. However, the intersection of gender and mentorship has not yet been explored within the field of military medicine. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of gender in mentorship within the field of military medicine.
Materials and methods: We investigated gender and mentorship within military medicine by developing and distributing a 16-item Likert survey to active-duty military physicians. We used the Chi-squared test of independence and the independent samples t-test to examine the role of gender in mentorship among the 16 questions.
Results: The male respondents reported more same-gender mentors than females (male [M]: 61.9% vs. female [F]: 33.0%), whereas the female respondents had significantly more mentors of the opposite gender than males (M: 12.4% vs. F: 47.3%). A higher proportion of males indicated no preference compared to females. Conversely, a significant preference for a same-sex mentor was expressed by female respondents compared to male respondents (M: 5.2% vs. F: 30.1%). In contrast, female respondents considered having a mentor more important than their male counterparts (t(206) = -2.26, P = .012, F: 3.86 vs. M: 3.57). Both male and female respondents had significantly more female mentees ($chi _{left( 1 right)}^2$ = 12.92, P < .001, Cramer's V = 0.254).
Conclusions: While the female participants in our study preferred female mentors, the male participants had more same-gender mentors than the female participants. In addition, more females reported that they did not have the time to be mentored. Our results, therefore, suggest that training males to be better mentors to females and providing accessible mentorship training to females may promote equitable career development within military medicine.
导言:在军队中,导师制对专业发展和晋升至关重要。在民用医学领域,性别与导师制之间的交叉对研究机会、学术成功和职业发展具有重要影响。然而,在军事医学领域,性别与导师制之间的交集尚未得到探讨。因此,本研究旨在调查性别在军事医学领域导师制中的作用:我们制定并向现役军医分发了一份包含 16 个项目的李克特调查问卷,以此调查军事医学领域中的性别与导师关系。我们使用卡方检验(Chi-squared test of independence)和独立样本 t 检验(independent samples t-test)来研究 16 个问题中性别在导师关系中的作用:结果:男性受访者报告的同性导师多于女性(男性[M]:61.9% 对女性[F]:33.0%),而女性受访者报告的异性导师明显多于男性(男性[M]:12.4% 对女性[F]:47.3%)。与女性相比,男性表示没有偏好的比例更高。相反,与男性受访者相比,女性受访者对同性导师有明显偏好(男:5.2%;女:30.1%)。相比之下,女性受访者认为导师比男性受访者更重要(t(206) = -2.26,P = .012,女方:3.86 对男方:3.57)。男性和女性受访者都有明显更多的女性被指导者($chi _{left( 1 right)}^2$=12.92,P 结论:虽然我们研究中的女性参与者更喜欢女性导师,但男性参与者拥有的同性导师要多于女性参与者。此外,更多女性表示她们没有时间接受指导。因此,我们的研究结果表明,培训男性成为女性更好的导师,并为女性提供方便的导师培训,可以促进军事医学领域的公平职业发展。
{"title":"Gender and Mentorship in Military Medicine: A Survey Study.","authors":"Rebekah Cole, Kaitlin Zurbrugg, Yen Lee, Ting Dong, Jessica Bunin, Guinevere Granite, Amber Barak, Sherri L Rudinsky","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae261","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mentorship is essential for professional development and advancement within the military. In civilian medicine, the intersection between gender and mentorship holds important implications for research opportunities, academic success, and career progression. However, the intersection of gender and mentorship has not yet been explored within the field of military medicine. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of gender in mentorship within the field of military medicine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We investigated gender and mentorship within military medicine by developing and distributing a 16-item Likert survey to active-duty military physicians. We used the Chi-squared test of independence and the independent samples t-test to examine the role of gender in mentorship among the 16 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The male respondents reported more same-gender mentors than females (male [M]: 61.9% vs. female [F]: 33.0%), whereas the female respondents had significantly more mentors of the opposite gender than males (M: 12.4% vs. F: 47.3%). A higher proportion of males indicated no preference compared to females. Conversely, a significant preference for a same-sex mentor was expressed by female respondents compared to male respondents (M: 5.2% vs. F: 30.1%). In contrast, female respondents considered having a mentor more important than their male counterparts (t(206) = -2.26, P = .012, F: 3.86 vs. M: 3.57). Both male and female respondents had significantly more female mentees ($chi _{left( 1 right)}^2$ = 12.92, P < .001, Cramer's V = 0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the female participants in our study preferred female mentors, the male participants had more same-gender mentors than the female participants. In addition, more females reported that they did not have the time to be mentored. Our results, therefore, suggest that training males to be better mentors to females and providing accessible mentorship training to females may promote equitable career development within military medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141070987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Narayan Yoganandan, Alok Shah, Jared Koser, Lewis Somberg, Brian D Stemper, Valeta Carol Chancey, Joseph Barney McEntire
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Warfighters are issued hard body armor designed to defeat ballistic projectiles. The resulting backface deformation can injure different thoracoabdominal organs. Developed over decades ago, the behind armor blunt impact criterion of maximum 44 mm depth in clay continues to be used independent of armor type or impact location on the thoracoabdominal region covered by the armor. Because thoracoabdominal components have different energy absorption capabilities, their mode of failures and mechanical properties are different. These considerations underscore the lack of effectiveness of using the single standard to cover all thoracoabdominal components to represent the same level of injury risk. The objective of this pilot study is to conduct cardiac impact tests with a live animal model and analyze biomechanical injury candidate metrics for behind armor blunt trauma applications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Live swine tests were conducted after obtaining approvals from the U.S. DoD. Trachea tubes. An intravenous line were introduced into the swine before administering anesthesia. Pressure transducers were inserted into lungs and aorta. An indenter simulating backface deformation profiles produced by body armor from military-relevant ballistics to human cadavers delivered impact to the heart region. The approved test protocol included 6-hour monitoring and necropsies. Indenter accelerometer signals were processed to compute the velocity and deflection, and their peak magnitudes were obtained. The deflection-time signal was normalized with respect to chest depth along the impact axis. The peak magnitude of the viscous criterion, kinetic energy, force, momentum and stiffness were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 8 specimens, 2 were sham controls. The mean total body mass and soft tissue thickness at the impact site were 81.1 ± 4.1 kg and 3.8 ± 1.1 cm. The peak velocities ranged from 30 to 59 m/s, normalized deflections ranged from 15 to 21%, and energies ranged from 105 to 407 J. The range in momentum and stiffness were 7.0 to 13.9 kg-m/s and 22.3 to 79.9 N/m. The maximum forces and impulse data ranged from 2.9 to 11.7 kN and 1.9 to 5.8 N-s. The peak viscous criterion ranged from 2.0 to 5.3 m/s. One animal did not sustain any injuries, 2 had cardiac injuries, and others had lung and skeletal injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study applied blunt impact loads to the live swine cardiac region and determined potential candidate injury metrics for characterization. The sample size of 6 swine produced injuries ranging from none to pure skeletal to pure organ trauma. The viscous criterion metric associated with the response of the animal demonstrated a differing pattern than other variables with increasing velocity. These findings demonstrate that our live animal experimental design can be effectively used with testing additional samples to develop behind armor blunt
{"title":"Analysis of Injury Metrics From Experimental Cardiac Injuries From Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Using Live Swine Tests: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Narayan Yoganandan, Alok Shah, Jared Koser, Lewis Somberg, Brian D Stemper, Valeta Carol Chancey, Joseph Barney McEntire","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae297","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usae297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Warfighters are issued hard body armor designed to defeat ballistic projectiles. The resulting backface deformation can injure different thoracoabdominal organs. Developed over decades ago, the behind armor blunt impact criterion of maximum 44 mm depth in clay continues to be used independent of armor type or impact location on the thoracoabdominal region covered by the armor. Because thoracoabdominal components have different energy absorption capabilities, their mode of failures and mechanical properties are different. These considerations underscore the lack of effectiveness of using the single standard to cover all thoracoabdominal components to represent the same level of injury risk. The objective of this pilot study is to conduct cardiac impact tests with a live animal model and analyze biomechanical injury candidate metrics for behind armor blunt trauma applications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Live swine tests were conducted after obtaining approvals from the U.S. DoD. Trachea tubes. An intravenous line were introduced into the swine before administering anesthesia. Pressure transducers were inserted into lungs and aorta. An indenter simulating backface deformation profiles produced by body armor from military-relevant ballistics to human cadavers delivered impact to the heart region. The approved test protocol included 6-hour monitoring and necropsies. Indenter accelerometer signals were processed to compute the velocity and deflection, and their peak magnitudes were obtained. The deflection-time signal was normalized with respect to chest depth along the impact axis. The peak magnitude of the viscous criterion, kinetic energy, force, momentum and stiffness were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 8 specimens, 2 were sham controls. The mean total body mass and soft tissue thickness at the impact site were 81.1 ± 4.1 kg and 3.8 ± 1.1 cm. The peak velocities ranged from 30 to 59 m/s, normalized deflections ranged from 15 to 21%, and energies ranged from 105 to 407 J. The range in momentum and stiffness were 7.0 to 13.9 kg-m/s and 22.3 to 79.9 N/m. The maximum forces and impulse data ranged from 2.9 to 11.7 kN and 1.9 to 5.8 N-s. The peak viscous criterion ranged from 2.0 to 5.3 m/s. One animal did not sustain any injuries, 2 had cardiac injuries, and others had lung and skeletal injuries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study applied blunt impact loads to the live swine cardiac region and determined potential candidate injury metrics for characterization. The sample size of 6 swine produced injuries ranging from none to pure skeletal to pure organ trauma. The viscous criterion metric associated with the response of the animal demonstrated a differing pattern than other variables with increasing velocity. These findings demonstrate that our live animal experimental design can be effectively used with testing additional samples to develop behind armor blunt","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141327674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rom A Stevens, Michael S Baker, Ostap B Zubach, Michael Samotowka
Hands-on training and social media sites have heavily emphasized the use of tourniquets to treat limb injuries during the Ukraine war. Tourniquet overuse or misuse can lead to significant tragedy-limb loss, physiologic complications, and even death. Casualty evacuation in Ukraine often exceeds 6 hours, and the liberal use of limb tourniquets may have unintentionally increased morbidity. Tourniquet application was appropriate in 24.6% of the wounded with tourniquets in one recent publication by a Ukrainian vascular surgeon. The longer a limb tourniquet is in place raises the risk of compartment syndrome, vascular thrombosis, rhabdomyolysis, and irreversible myonecrosis resulting in major tissue loss and often necessitating limb amputation. If bleeding is controlled with a tourniquet, attempts to remove the tourniquet as early as possible to avoid the negative consequences are essential. Training in tourniquet use without explaining possible limb loss and other complications resulting from tourniquets left in situ more than 2 hours makes use risky. Tourniquets should be loosened at one hour if the tactical situation allows, and the injury assessed to determine if major bleeding persists or to determine if other methods of hemostasis would be effective. Ukraine must improve the training so that everyone becomes aware of the risks of prolonged or improper tourniquet use. This tourniquet training information must be transmitted to military medical leaders, Ukrainian military medics, civilian volunteers, volunteers in Ukraine, and NATO trainers in allied countries conducting medical training for Ukrainian soldiers. A trauma registry and tracking through echelons of care can enhance performance improvement through timely feedback.
{"title":"Misuse of Tourniquets in Ukraine may be Costing More Lives and Limbs Than They Save.","authors":"Rom A Stevens, Michael S Baker, Ostap B Zubach, Michael Samotowka","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usad503","DOIUrl":"10.1093/milmed/usad503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hands-on training and social media sites have heavily emphasized the use of tourniquets to treat limb injuries during the Ukraine war. Tourniquet overuse or misuse can lead to significant tragedy-limb loss, physiologic complications, and even death. Casualty evacuation in Ukraine often exceeds 6 hours, and the liberal use of limb tourniquets may have unintentionally increased morbidity. Tourniquet application was appropriate in 24.6% of the wounded with tourniquets in one recent publication by a Ukrainian vascular surgeon. The longer a limb tourniquet is in place raises the risk of compartment syndrome, vascular thrombosis, rhabdomyolysis, and irreversible myonecrosis resulting in major tissue loss and often necessitating limb amputation. If bleeding is controlled with a tourniquet, attempts to remove the tourniquet as early as possible to avoid the negative consequences are essential. Training in tourniquet use without explaining possible limb loss and other complications resulting from tourniquets left in situ more than 2 hours makes use risky. Tourniquets should be loosened at one hour if the tactical situation allows, and the injury assessed to determine if major bleeding persists or to determine if other methods of hemostasis would be effective. Ukraine must improve the training so that everyone becomes aware of the risks of prolonged or improper tourniquet use. This tourniquet training information must be transmitted to military medical leaders, Ukrainian military medics, civilian volunteers, volunteers in Ukraine, and NATO trainers in allied countries conducting medical training for Ukrainian soldiers. A trauma registry and tracking through echelons of care can enhance performance improvement through timely feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139501777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}