Pub Date : 2022-03-31DOI: 10.52532/2521-6414-2022-1-63-47-50
T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek
Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most radical method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its prevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance is attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period. Regional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. In choosing the method of anesthesia, the qualification of the anesthetist plays a role, especially when performing high epidural anesthesia, which is quite technically complicated. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia has significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgical practice. This study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described clinical case as an example. Methods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical signs of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the omentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and morphine was used as an anesthetic aid. Results: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and adequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on Day 3-5 after surgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period. Conclusion: Thus, our experience in the use of regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgical practice as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject to technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or component of generally accepted traditional general anesthesia in order to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative period and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.
{"title":"EXPERIENCE OF USING EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN ONCOSURGERY: \u0000A CLINICAL CASE","authors":"T. Sadykova, M. Kuzikeev, B. Sarsembaev, E. Orazbek","doi":"10.52532/2521-6414-2022-1-63-47-50","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2022-1-63-47-50","url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most radical method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations \u0000are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its prevalence, the presence of \u0000metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance is attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period. \u0000Regional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. In choosing the method of anesthesia, the qualification of the anesthetist plays a role, especially when performing high epidural anesthesia, \u0000which is quite technically complicated. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia has significantly \u0000expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgical practice. \u0000This study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described clinical case as an example. \u0000Methods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical signs \u0000of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the omentum, and \u0000lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and morphine was used \u0000as an anesthetic aid. \u0000Results: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and adequate \u0000pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on Day 3-5 after surgery. Subjectively, \u0000the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period. \u0000Conclusion: Thus, our experience in the use of regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgical practice as an isolated method of anesthesia, \u0000subject to technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or component of \u0000generally accepted traditional general anesthesia in order to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative \u0000period and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":"16 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82927406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}