Background: Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are increasingly reported worldwide, but data on their epidemiology remain limited in tropical settings. We aimed to characterize the causative agents of BJIs and their resistance patterns, in order to inform empirical antibiotic in our tropical setting.
Methods: This 6-year retrospective study included all adults with a first microbiologically confirmed episode of BJI between January 2019 and December 2024 at the Guadeloupe University Hospital, a tertiary care center in the Caribbean.
Results: A total of 312 patients with BJI were included. Among the 449 isolates recovered, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were predominant (41%), including AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (13%, 59/449) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9%, 39/449). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 3% (13/449). At least one GNB was identified in 31% of native septic arthritis (27/88), 33% of spondylodiscitis (9/27), 38% of prosthetic joint infections (27/71), 47% of osteosynthesis-associated infections (48/103), and 52% of osteomyelitis (12/23). Factors independently associated with GNB infection were a history of bite/scratch wound, contact with soil/vegetation and lower limb infection. Cefazolin provided limited likelihood of in vitro adequacy against causal pathogens in native septic arthritis episodes (74%, as compared to 92% for both cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam). Lower rates were observed in cases of osteosynthesis-associated and prosthetic joint infections (48%-68%, as compared to 62%-75% for third-generation cephalosporins, 79%-80% for cefepime and 80%-86% for piperacillin-tazobactam).
Conclusions: Our findings highlight the prominent role of GNBs in tropical BJI and support the implementation of local surveillance systems to guide empirical treatment strategies.
背景:骨和关节感染(BJIs)在世界范围内的报道越来越多,但其流行病学数据在热带地区仍然有限。我们的目的是表征BJIs的病原体及其耐药模式,以便为热带环境中的经验抗生素提供信息。方法:这项为期6年的回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月至2024年12月在加勒比海三级医疗中心瓜德罗普大学医院(Guadeloupe University Hospital)首次微生物学证实的BJI发作的所有成年人。结果:共纳入312例BJI患者。449株分离菌中以革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)为主(41%),包括产AmpC β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌(13%,59/449)和铜绿假单胞菌(9%,39/449)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌占3%(13/449)。在31%的天然脓毒性关节炎(27/88)、33%的脊椎椎间盘炎(9/27)、38%的假体关节感染(27/71)、47%的骨合成相关感染(48/103)和52%的骨髓炎(12/23)中发现至少一种GNB。与GNB感染独立相关的因素有咬伤/抓伤史、接触土壤/植被和下肢感染。头孢唑林在体外对原发脓毒性关节炎病原的有效性有限(74%,而头孢吡肟和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦均为92%)。骨合成相关和假体关节感染的发生率较低(48%-68%,而第三代头孢菌素为62%-75%,头孢吡肟为79%-80%,哌西林-他唑巴坦为80%-86%)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了gnb在热带BJI中的突出作用,并支持实施地方监测系统来指导经经验治疗策略。
{"title":"Bone and Joint Infections in Tropical Settings: High Prevalence of Gram-Negative Bacilli and Implications for Empirical Therapy.","authors":"Carla Pizzinat, Sylvaine Bastian, Frédéric Desmoulins, Elodie Curlier, Sébastien Breurec, Olivier Lesens, Kinda Schepers, Samuel Markowicz, Julien Coussement, Tanguy Dequidt","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag024","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofag024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are increasingly reported worldwide, but data on their epidemiology remain limited in tropical settings. We aimed to characterize the causative agents of BJIs and their resistance patterns, in order to inform empirical antibiotic in our tropical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 6-year retrospective study included all adults with a first microbiologically confirmed episode of BJI between January 2019 and December 2024 at the Guadeloupe University Hospital, a tertiary care center in the Caribbean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 312 patients with BJI were included. Among the 449 isolates recovered, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were predominant (41%), including AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (13%, 59/449) and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (9%, 39/449). Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> accounted for 3% (13/449). At least one GNB was identified in 31% of native septic arthritis (27/88), 33% of spondylodiscitis (9/27), 38% of prosthetic joint infections (27/71), 47% of osteosynthesis-associated infections (48/103), and 52% of osteomyelitis (12/23). Factors independently associated with GNB infection were a history of bite/scratch wound, contact with soil/vegetation and lower limb infection. Cefazolin provided limited likelihood of <i>in vitro</i> adequacy against causal pathogens in native septic arthritis episodes (74%, as compared to 92% for both cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam). Lower rates were observed in cases of osteosynthesis-associated and prosthetic joint infections (48%-68%, as compared to 62%-75% for third-generation cephalosporins, 79%-80% for cefepime and 80%-86% for piperacillin-tazobactam).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the prominent role of GNBs in tropical BJI and support the implementation of local surveillance systems to guide empirical treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 2","pages":"ofag024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12877873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146143063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag025
James Harris, Kate Alexander, Penny Hutchinson, Deborah Judd, Bonnie Mcfarlane, Catherine Quagliotto, Vicki Slinko, James Smith, Nicolas Smoll, Mark Stickley, Alexandra Uren, Megan Young
Background: Although failure of rabies postexposure prophylaxis is rare, several factors, including improper vaccine or rabies immunoglobulin administration, may increase the risk. Where there is the potential for postexposure prophylaxis failure, public health units may recommend serology to confirm a therapeutic immune response. This study evaluates which factors increase the risk of failed seroconversion in cases where serology was indicated after rabies postexposure prophylaxis.
Methods: Potential lyssavirus exposure notifications where serology was collected were identified from 5 Southeast Queensland public health units from June 2015 to December 2022. Data on the indication and outcome of serology were extracted from public health case notes. Descriptive analysis was performed comparing serology outcomes by demographic and PEP course characteristics. Modeling for identified risk factors was conducted using hierarchical selection logistic regression analysis.
Results: One hundred eighty-one potential exposures were included in the study. Giving a rabies vaccine in the wrong site (relative risk [RR], 10.8; 95% CI, 2.6-36.4) or a vaccine into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin (RR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9-16.9) increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after adjusting for age and serology indication. Age ≥65 also increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after controlling for administration errors (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.3-11.7).
Conclusions: Administering rabies vaccine into an incorrect site or into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin increases the risk of failed seroconversion. In such cases, we recommend that the risk is sufficient to invalidate the dose and immediately repeat it without serology. Older age may be an independent risk factor for failed seroconversion.
{"title":"Evaluation of Risk Factors for Failed Seroconversion in the Management of Potential Lyssavirus Exposures.","authors":"James Harris, Kate Alexander, Penny Hutchinson, Deborah Judd, Bonnie Mcfarlane, Catherine Quagliotto, Vicki Slinko, James Smith, Nicolas Smoll, Mark Stickley, Alexandra Uren, Megan Young","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag025","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofag025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although failure of rabies postexposure prophylaxis is rare, several factors, including improper vaccine or rabies immunoglobulin administration, may increase the risk. Where there is the potential for postexposure prophylaxis failure, public health units may recommend serology to confirm a therapeutic immune response. This study evaluates which factors increase the risk of failed seroconversion in cases where serology was indicated after rabies postexposure prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Potential lyssavirus exposure notifications where serology was collected were identified from 5 Southeast Queensland public health units from June 2015 to December 2022. Data on the indication and outcome of serology were extracted from public health case notes. Descriptive analysis was performed comparing serology outcomes by demographic and PEP course characteristics. Modeling for identified risk factors was conducted using hierarchical selection logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-one potential exposures were included in the study. Giving a rabies vaccine in the wrong site (relative risk [RR], 10.8; 95% CI, 2.6-36.4) or a vaccine into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin (RR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9-16.9) increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after adjusting for age and serology indication. Age ≥65 also increased the risk of nontherapeutic serology after controlling for administration errors (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.3-11.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administering rabies vaccine into an incorrect site or into the same arm within 72 hours of rabies immunoglobulin increases the risk of failed seroconversion. In such cases, we recommend that the risk is sufficient to invalidate the dose and immediately repeat it without serology. Older age may be an independent risk factor for failed seroconversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 2","pages":"ofag025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12898917/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146202388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Febrile illness is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in low- and middle-income countries, yet the spatial distribution and environmental drivers of pediatric fever in Uganda remain poorly characterized.
Methods: We analyzed data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey to estimate the prevalence of febrile illness among children under 5 years of age. Using a geostatistical binomial model, we evaluated associations between fever prevalence and environmental, nutritional, and sociodemographic covariates. Spatial prediction and model calibration were conducted using the PrevMap package in R, and model performance was assessed using nonrandomized probability integral transform (nrPIT) and theoretical variograms.
Results: Among 14 195 children from 685 clusters, 4990 (35.1%) were reported to have had fever in the prior 2 weeks. Predicted fever prevalence varied substantially by region and month, with highest rates in the eastern and northeastern regions and in the period following the rainy season. Covariates including poverty, anemia, rainfall (2-month lag), enhanced vegetation index (1-month lag), and seasonality significantly improved model performance and reduced spatial uncertainty.
Conclusions: Our findings reveal pronounced geographic and temporal heterogeneity in pediatric febrile illness in Uganda. Environmental and nutritional factors significantly contribute to this variation. These results support targeted, region-specific public health interventions and inform future research into the etiologic drivers of pediatric fever.
{"title":"Geospatial Mapping of Pediatric Febrile Illness in Uganda to Inform Precision Public Health Interventions.","authors":"Paddy Ssentongo, Misaki Sasanami, Camille Moeckel, Claudio Fronterrè","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf760","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Febrile illness is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in low- and middle-income countries, yet the spatial distribution and environmental drivers of pediatric fever in Uganda remain poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey to estimate the prevalence of febrile illness among children under 5 years of age. Using a geostatistical binomial model, we evaluated associations between fever prevalence and environmental, nutritional, and sociodemographic covariates. Spatial prediction and model calibration were conducted using the PrevMap package in R, and model performance was assessed using nonrandomized probability integral transform (nrPIT) and theoretical variograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14 195 children from 685 clusters, 4990 (35.1%) were reported to have had fever in the prior 2 weeks. Predicted fever prevalence varied substantially by region and month, with highest rates in the eastern and northeastern regions and in the period following the rainy season. Covariates including poverty, anemia, rainfall (2-month lag), enhanced vegetation index (1-month lag), and seasonality significantly improved model performance and reduced spatial uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal pronounced geographic and temporal heterogeneity in pediatric febrile illness in Uganda. Environmental and nutritional factors significantly contribute to this variation. These results support targeted, region-specific public health interventions and inform future research into the etiologic drivers of pediatric fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf731
Emmanuel Nazaire Essam Nkodo, Pooja Maheria, Eric Hurwitz, Alfred Jerrod Anzalone, Dongmei Li, Jessica Y Islam, Jing Sun, Cara D Varley, Zachary Butzin-Dozier, Sandra E Safo, Kaylyn Kirksey, Shukri A Hassan, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Rena C Patel, Nada Fadul
Background: While disparities in COVID-19 therapeutic access have been documented, the effect of HIV status on treatment access and how it intersects with other sociodemographic factors has not been well explored. Using data from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C), we investigated disparities in COVID-19 therapeutic prescription among persons with HIV and without HIV.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients' data from January 2020 to November 2024. The study included 7 806 412 patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis, of whom 45 508 (0.58%) were persons with HIV. We employed logistic and linear regression models to assess associations between therapeutic receipt and patient characteristics.
Results: Persons with HIV had significantly higher adjusted odds of receiving COVID-19 therapeutics compared to persons without HIV (remdesivir, aOR 1.26 [95% CI: 1.20, 1.33]; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, aOR 2.86 [95% CI: 2.77, 2.95]). Despite this, significant racial/ethnic inequities were observed. American Indian or Alaskan Native persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.997) and Hispanic/Latinx persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.992) had a lower estimated prevalence of remdesivir receipt compared to White Non-Hispanic individuals. For nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, Black/African American individuals (persons with HIV, estimated coefficient 0.947; persons without HIV, estimated coefficient 0.943), American Indian or Alaskan Native persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.996), and Hispanic/Latinx individuals (estimated coefficient 0.992) showed a lower estimated prevalence of receipt compared to their White counterparts.
Conclusions: Persons with HIV demonstrated higher odds of receiving COVID-19 therapeutics than persons without HIV. However, persistent racial and ethnic inequities in treatment uptake were evident.
{"title":"HIV Status and COVID-19 Treatment Disparities in the US National Clinical Cohort Collaborative.","authors":"Emmanuel Nazaire Essam Nkodo, Pooja Maheria, Eric Hurwitz, Alfred Jerrod Anzalone, Dongmei Li, Jessica Y Islam, Jing Sun, Cara D Varley, Zachary Butzin-Dozier, Sandra E Safo, Kaylyn Kirksey, Shukri A Hassan, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Rena C Patel, Nada Fadul","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf731","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While disparities in COVID-19 therapeutic access have been documented, the effect of HIV status on treatment access and how it intersects with other sociodemographic factors has not been well explored. Using data from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C), we investigated disparities in COVID-19 therapeutic prescription among persons with HIV and without HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients' data from January 2020 to November 2024. The study included 7 806 412 patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis, of whom 45 508 (0.58%) were persons with HIV. We employed logistic and linear regression models to assess associations between therapeutic receipt and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persons with HIV had significantly higher adjusted odds of receiving COVID-19 therapeutics compared to persons without HIV (remdesivir, aOR 1.26 [95% CI: 1.20, 1.33]; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, aOR 2.86 [95% CI: 2.77, 2.95]). Despite this, significant racial/ethnic inequities were observed. American Indian or Alaskan Native persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.997) and Hispanic/Latinx persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.992) had a lower estimated prevalence of remdesivir receipt compared to White Non-Hispanic individuals. For nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, Black/African American individuals (persons with HIV, estimated coefficient 0.947; persons without HIV, estimated coefficient 0.943), American Indian or Alaskan Native persons with HIV (estimated coefficient 0.996), and Hispanic/Latinx individuals (estimated coefficient 0.992) showed a lower estimated prevalence of receipt compared to their White counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persons with HIV demonstrated higher odds of receiving COVID-19 therapeutics than persons without HIV. However, persistent racial and ethnic inequities in treatment uptake were evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf748
Cesar A Gomez-Cabello, Igor Dumic, Michael J Maniaci, Margaret R Paulson, Aryan Shiari, Leah W Webster, Jeni McGrew, Ariana Genovese, Bernardo Collaco, Maissa Trabilsy, Antonio J Forte, Wendelyn Bosch
Background: Outcomes of patients with acute pyelonephritis (AP) treated in a hospital-at-home setting have not been comprehensively evaluated in the United States.
Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with and managed for AP in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program between July 2020 and January 2025. Collected data included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), genitourinary comorbidities, severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality (ROM) scores, as well as pyelonephritis-related complications. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day postdischarge emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and mortality.
Results: A total of 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 years; SOI scores were moderate in 33.3%, major in 52.1%, and extreme in 8.5%. ROM scores were moderate in 30.3%, major in 38.2%, and extreme in 6.7%. Median CCI score was 5, and all patients had preexisting genitourinary conditions. On admission, 30.9% met sepsis criteria, acute kidney injury was present in 47.3%, and bacteremia developed in 33.3%. Median LOS in the ACH program was 3.1 days. Only 4.8% required escalation to a brick-and-mortar hospital. Readmission occurred in 17.0%, and 4.8% had ED visits. No in-program deaths occurred.
Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective study shows that AP, including cases with high illness severity and complex comorbidities, can be managed safely and effectively in a hospital-at-home setting with careful patient selection and robust infrastructure to support timely escalation when needed.
{"title":"Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Pyelonephritis Treated in Mayo Clinic's Hospital-at-Home Program.","authors":"Cesar A Gomez-Cabello, Igor Dumic, Michael J Maniaci, Margaret R Paulson, Aryan Shiari, Leah W Webster, Jeni McGrew, Ariana Genovese, Bernardo Collaco, Maissa Trabilsy, Antonio J Forte, Wendelyn Bosch","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf748","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf748","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes of patients with acute pyelonephritis (AP) treated in a hospital-at-home setting have not been comprehensively evaluated in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with and managed for AP in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program between July 2020 and January 2025. Collected data included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), genitourinary comorbidities, severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality (ROM) scores, as well as pyelonephritis-related complications. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day postdischarge emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 years; SOI scores were moderate in 33.3%, major in 52.1%, and extreme in 8.5%. ROM scores were moderate in 30.3%, major in 38.2%, and extreme in 6.7%. Median CCI score was 5, and all patients had preexisting genitourinary conditions. On admission, 30.9% met sepsis criteria, acute kidney injury was present in 47.3%, and bacteremia developed in 33.3%. Median LOS in the ACH program was 3.1 days. Only 4.8% required escalation to a brick-and-mortar hospital. Readmission occurred in 17.0%, and 4.8% had ED visits. No in-program deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study shows that AP, including cases with high illness severity and complex comorbidities, can be managed safely and effectively in a hospital-at-home setting with careful patient selection and robust infrastructure to support timely escalation when needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf748"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag019
Sara Y Tartof, Timothy B Frankland, Jeff M Slezak, Bradley K Ackerson, Laura Puzniak
Vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 KP.2 vaccine against COVID-19 hospital admissions was 49% (95% CI, 30-63) and 45% (95% CI, 35-54) against emergency department/urgent care encounters (vs no KP.2 vaccine at <3 months). Protection persisted >90 days from vaccination with some waning. Vaccine effectiveness remained high regardless of prior COVID-19 vaccination and among older adults.
{"title":"Effectiveness and Durability of the BNT162b2 KP.2 Vaccine Against COVID-19 Hospitalization and Emergency Department or Urgent Care Encounters in US Adults.","authors":"Sara Y Tartof, Timothy B Frankland, Jeff M Slezak, Bradley K Ackerson, Laura Puzniak","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag019","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofag019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 KP.2 vaccine against COVID-19 hospital admissions was 49% (95% CI, 30-63) and 45% (95% CI, 35-54) against emergency department/urgent care encounters (vs no KP.2 vaccine at <3 months). Protection persisted >90 days from vaccination with some waning. Vaccine effectiveness remained high regardless of prior COVID-19 vaccination and among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 2","pages":"ofag019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146143070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag022
Rungnapa Phunpang, Prapassorn Poolchanuan, Taylor D Coston, Adul Dulsuk, Sopha Saeyang, Boonthanom Moonmueangsan, Narongchai Sangsa, Sermchart Chinnakarnsawas, Rachan Janon, T Eoin West, Narisara Chantratita, Shelton W Wright
Background: In many resource-limited settings, hospitalization for community-acquired infection is common, but data regarding illness severity, etiology, and morbidity remain sparse.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study from May 2022 to August 2023 at 2 hospitals in northeast Thailand. Adults hospitalized with community-acquired infection were enrolled within 24 hours of admission and followed up to 28 days. We identified patients meeting sepsis criteria and assessed related epidemiology, management, and mortality risk factors.
Results: Of 1445 patients screened, 940 were enrolled. The median age was 60 years and preexisting diabetes mellitus was common (42%). Sixty-six percent of patients met sepsis criteria. Blood cultures and broad-spectrum antibiotics on admission were common (both >95%), although lactate measurement was performed in 43% of patients with sepsis. In patients with sepsis, critical illness outside the intensive care unit was common on medical ward admission, including respiratory failure (33%) and shock (21%). Tropical etiologies of infection included melioidosis (8%) and leptospirosis (4%), and gram-negative organisms accounted for 81% of bacteremia. Twenty percent of patients with sepsis died by 28 days. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) on admission was independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30-3.29; P = .002), and patients with SA-AKI had worse survival (P < .001) than those without.
Conclusions: In rural Southeast Asia, sepsis is common among patients hospitalized with infection and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Distinct pathogens and broad-spectrum antibiotics are common, even in the absence of sepsis. We identified several modifiable risk factors of death, including SA-AKI, potentially influencing initial management in similar settings.
{"title":"Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Infection in a Resource-Limited Setting in Southeast Asia: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Rungnapa Phunpang, Prapassorn Poolchanuan, Taylor D Coston, Adul Dulsuk, Sopha Saeyang, Boonthanom Moonmueangsan, Narongchai Sangsa, Sermchart Chinnakarnsawas, Rachan Janon, T Eoin West, Narisara Chantratita, Shelton W Wright","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag022","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofag022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many resource-limited settings, hospitalization for community-acquired infection is common, but data regarding illness severity, etiology, and morbidity remain sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study from May 2022 to August 2023 at 2 hospitals in northeast Thailand. Adults hospitalized with community-acquired infection were enrolled within 24 hours of admission and followed up to 28 days. We identified patients meeting sepsis criteria and assessed related epidemiology, management, and mortality risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1445 patients screened, 940 were enrolled. The median age was 60 years and preexisting diabetes mellitus was common (42%). Sixty-six percent of patients met sepsis criteria. Blood cultures and broad-spectrum antibiotics on admission were common (both >95%), although lactate measurement was performed in 43% of patients with sepsis. In patients with sepsis, critical illness outside the intensive care unit was common on medical ward admission, including respiratory failure (33%) and shock (21%). Tropical etiologies of infection included melioidosis (8%) and leptospirosis (4%), and gram-negative organisms accounted for 81% of bacteremia. Twenty percent of patients with sepsis died by 28 days. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) on admission was independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30-3.29; <i>P</i> = .002), and patients with SA-AKI had worse survival (<i>P</i> < .001) than those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In rural Southeast Asia, sepsis is common among patients hospitalized with infection and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Distinct pathogens and broad-spectrum antibiotics are common, even in the absence of sepsis. We identified several modifiable risk factors of death, including SA-AKI, potentially influencing initial management in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 2","pages":"ofag022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf786
Rina Liang, James C M Brust, Caitlin Reed, Vincent Escuyer, Derek T Armstrong, Nicole Parrish, Patrick Valois, Marie-Claire Rowlinson, Atanaska Marinova-Petkova, Gregory P Bisson, Sarah M Labuda, Angel Colon-Semidey, Connie A Haley, David Ashkin, Charles A Peloquin, Alfred Lardizabal, Amee Patrawalla, Alice Cuenca, Michelle K Haas, Richard Brostrom, Chima Mbakwem, Marcos C Schechter, Susan M Ray, Jason Cummins, Barbara Cahill, Katherine Arn, Lisa L Chen, John W Wilson, Neela D Goswami
Background: Bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M) are recommended oral 6-month treatment regimens for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant (MDR/RR) tuberculosis (TB). Since the US rollout of these regimens in 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and partners have identified patients who failed or relapsed on these regimens.
Methods: Here, we report a case series of US patients with TB treated with BPaL/M-containing regimens, who experienced adverse outcomes during the period 2022‒2024, including drug resistance, relapse, and treatment failure.
Results: Clinical and public health outcomes were significant for US patients reported. There were 8 patients identified (n = 8). 5 (62.5%) were male, with a median age 57 years, 2 (25%) were previously treated for TB, and 8 (100%) presented with cavitary disease. This included a patient who died from infectious TB with acquired resistance after exposing over 100 healthcare workers, a waitress who was found to have highly infectious TB at the time of her relapse, and a son who contracted Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) with reduced activity to bedaquiline from his mother in a household transmission event.
Conclusions: These patients highlight consequences, both for the individual and public health, of relapse and treatment failure in real-life operational settings that may not be readily evident in well-controlled and well-resourced clinical trials. Despite the advent of shorter and better tolerated bedaquiline-based regimens, US clinicians continue to face challenges in managing drug-resistant TB. These data support the need for expert management of these patients beyond routine TB care, as well as the need for close monitoring and follow-up months after treatment completion.
{"title":"Relapse and Emergent Resistance With Novel Short-Course Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis, United States, 2022-2024.","authors":"Rina Liang, James C M Brust, Caitlin Reed, Vincent Escuyer, Derek T Armstrong, Nicole Parrish, Patrick Valois, Marie-Claire Rowlinson, Atanaska Marinova-Petkova, Gregory P Bisson, Sarah M Labuda, Angel Colon-Semidey, Connie A Haley, David Ashkin, Charles A Peloquin, Alfred Lardizabal, Amee Patrawalla, Alice Cuenca, Michelle K Haas, Richard Brostrom, Chima Mbakwem, Marcos C Schechter, Susan M Ray, Jason Cummins, Barbara Cahill, Katherine Arn, Lisa L Chen, John W Wilson, Neela D Goswami","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf786","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf786","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M) are recommended oral 6-month treatment regimens for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant (MDR/RR) tuberculosis (TB). Since the US rollout of these regimens in 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and partners have identified patients who failed or relapsed on these regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we report a case series of US patients with TB treated with BPaL/M-containing regimens, who experienced adverse outcomes during the period 2022‒2024, including drug resistance, relapse, and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical and public health outcomes were significant for US patients reported. There were 8 patients identified (n = 8). 5 (62.5%) were male, with a median age 57 years, 2 (25%) were previously treated for TB, and 8 (100%) presented with cavitary disease. This included a patient who died from infectious TB with acquired resistance after exposing over 100 healthcare workers, a waitress who was found to have highly infectious TB at the time of her relapse, and a son who contracted <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (<i>Mtb</i>) with reduced activity to bedaquiline from his mother in a household transmission event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These patients highlight consequences, both for the individual and public health, of relapse and treatment failure in real-life operational settings that may not be readily evident in well-controlled and well-resourced clinical trials. Despite the advent of shorter and better tolerated bedaquiline-based regimens, US clinicians continue to face challenges in managing drug-resistant TB. These data support the need for expert management of these patients beyond routine TB care, as well as the need for close monitoring and follow-up months after treatment completion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803016/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145990411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag010
Joycelyn A Dame, Gabrielle Obeng-Koranteng, Nathan L'Etoile, Evelyn Amoah, Susan E Coffin, Adam J Ratner, Jonathan Strysko, Jiayin Zheng, Andrew P Steenhoff, Grace St Cyr
Background: Multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) sepsis is a significant cause of neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The role of vertical transmission in neonatal MDR-GN colonization and thereby invasive infection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature detailing the molecular relatedness of maternal and neonatal MDR-GN colonization isolates in LMICs, characterizing the extent of vertical transmission.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for LMIC literature reporting molecular evidence of MDR-GN concordance for mother-neonate dyads.
Results: Of 90 articles identified by the search, 11 met inclusion criteria. Findings demonstrated substantial MDR-GN colonization in dyads from LMICs, although with significant heterogeneity in sampling methods. From MDR-GN dyads, molecular methods rarely found relatedness. Many studies suggested horizontal transmission within the environment.
Conclusions: In LMICs, maternal MDR-GN colonization rarely results in vertical transmission to neonates. However, literature remains scarce and further research is needed.
{"title":"Molecular Relatedness of Maternal and Neonatal Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Colonization Isolates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Joycelyn A Dame, Gabrielle Obeng-Koranteng, Nathan L'Etoile, Evelyn Amoah, Susan E Coffin, Adam J Ratner, Jonathan Strysko, Jiayin Zheng, Andrew P Steenhoff, Grace St Cyr","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag010","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofag010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) sepsis is a significant cause of neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The role of vertical transmission in neonatal MDR-GN colonization and thereby invasive infection remains unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature detailing the molecular relatedness of maternal and neonatal MDR-GN colonization isolates in LMICs, characterizing the extent of vertical transmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for LMIC literature reporting molecular evidence of MDR-GN concordance for mother-neonate dyads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 90 articles identified by the search, 11 met inclusion criteria. Findings demonstrated substantial MDR-GN colonization in dyads from LMICs, although with significant heterogeneity in sampling methods. From MDR-GN dyads, molecular methods rarely found relatedness. Many studies suggested horizontal transmission within the environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In LMICs, maternal MDR-GN colonization rarely results in vertical transmission to neonates. However, literature remains scarce and further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 2","pages":"ofag010"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12871433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf804
Marion G Peters, Minhee Kang, Robert Murphy, William Rosenberg, David L Wyles
Change in liver fibrosis was studied over 5 years after cure of hepatitis C (HCV) in participants with and without HIV from the Viral Hepatitis C Infection Long-Term Cohort Study (VHICS). Markers of liver fibrosis included aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and a direct measure of extracellular matrix, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF). We evaluated 122 participants without HIV and 128 with HIV. At study entry, which occurred on average 30 weeks after antiviral completion, more participants had severe fibrosis by ELF (21%) than FIB-4 (7%) or APRI (1%). ELF scores were not available before entry into VHICS. The proportions of participants in predefined ELF categories were similar between the 2 groups at study entry and over time. Advanced fibrosis by ELF did not decrease over time. Clinical events were observed in 44 (12%): 29 HCV/HIV and 15 HCV participants. HCV/HIV participants had a 1.95 times higher risk of developing a clinical event, compared to HCV. A lower entry ELF score was numerically associated with a lower risk of a clinical event. There was an association between VHICS entry ELF and time to first targeted liver diagnosis or all-cause death (hazard ratio; 95% CI, 0.268 [.094-.763], P = .014). In conclusion, APRI and FIB-4 decreases occurred early after direct-acting antiretroviral therapy, likely from decreased necroinflammation. ELF identified participants who continued to have advanced liver fibrosis and was associated with development of liver outcomes and death. Studies after sustained virologic response should include longer term follow up to monitor for clinical events.
在病毒性丙型肝炎感染长期队列研究(VHICS)中,研究了丙型肝炎(HCV)治愈后5年的肝纤维化变化。肝纤维化的标志物包括天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值(APRI)、纤维化指数(FIB-4)和直接测量细胞外基质、增强肝纤维化(ELF)。我们评估了122名未感染HIV的参与者和128名感染HIV的参与者。在研究开始时,平均在完成抗病毒治疗30周后,ELF(21%)比FIB-4(7%)或APRI(1%)有更多的参与者出现严重纤维化。在进入VHICS之前没有ELF分数。在研究开始时和之后,两组参与者在预定义ELF类别中的比例相似。ELF引起的晚期纤维化没有随着时间的推移而减少。在44例(12%)中观察到临床事件:29例HCV/HIV和15例HCV参与者。与HCV相比,HCV/HIV参与者发生临床事件的风险高出1.95倍。较低的入门ELF评分与较低的临床事件风险在数值上相关。进入VHICS的ELF与首次靶向肝脏诊断或全因死亡的时间有关(风险比;95% CI, 0.268 [.094-.763], P = .014)。结论,在直接作用抗逆转录病毒治疗后,APRI和FIB-4的降低发生在早期,可能是由于坏死炎症的减少。ELF确定了持续存在晚期肝纤维化并与肝脏预后发展和死亡相关的参与者。持续病毒学反应后的研究应包括长期随访,以监测临床事件。
{"title":"Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Change After DAA-induced Cure of Hepatitis C in Participants With and Without HIV: ACTG A5320 Viral Hepatitis C Infection Long-term Cohort Study (VHICS).","authors":"Marion G Peters, Minhee Kang, Robert Murphy, William Rosenberg, David L Wyles","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf804","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf804","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Change in liver fibrosis was studied over 5 years after cure of hepatitis C (HCV) in participants with and without HIV from the Viral Hepatitis C Infection Long-Term Cohort Study (VHICS). Markers of liver fibrosis included aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and a direct measure of extracellular matrix, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF). We evaluated 122 participants without HIV and 128 with HIV. At study entry, which occurred on average 30 weeks after antiviral completion, more participants had severe fibrosis by ELF (21%) than FIB-4 (7%) or APRI (1%). ELF scores were not available before entry into VHICS. The proportions of participants in predefined ELF categories were similar between the 2 groups at study entry and over time. Advanced fibrosis by ELF did not decrease over time. Clinical events were observed in 44 (12%): 29 HCV/HIV and 15 HCV participants. HCV/HIV participants had a 1.95 times higher risk of developing a clinical event, compared to HCV. A lower entry ELF score was numerically associated with a lower risk of a clinical event. There was an association between VHICS entry ELF and time to first targeted liver diagnosis or all-cause death (hazard ratio; 95% CI, 0.268 [.094-.763], <i>P</i> = .014). In conclusion, APRI and FIB-4 decreases occurred early after direct-acting antiretroviral therapy, likely from decreased necroinflammation. ELF identified participants who continued to have advanced liver fibrosis and was associated with development of liver outcomes and death. Studies after sustained virologic response should include longer term follow up to monitor for clinical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf804"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145990379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}