Background: Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is crucial for reducing tuberculosis (TB) incidence and related mortality among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); however, its implementation in Georgia faces challenges. In this study, we aimed to explore the TPT care cascade among people with HIV (PWH) in Georgia.
Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed TPT uptake, adherence, and impact on TB development within the 2019-2020 cohort of newly diagnosed PWH across 4 major HIV service providers in Georgia. With qualitative analysis under the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we identified barriers and facilitators to its implementation.
Results: Among 1165 PWH, only 11.8% initiated TPT with isoniazid. Thirty-two developed active TB (incidence rate, 10/1000 person-years [95% confidence interval, 9.6-10.4]), none of whom received TPT. Only 43% of 137 PWH on TPT adhered for 3-6 months; 29 (21.1%) completed the full course. The study revealed poor TPT service coordination, worsened by major data limitations. Interviews identified several barriers to effective TPT implementation, summarized into 3 broad categories: the need for TPT service integration into HIV care, the potential development of an integrated electronic data system, and training gaps.
Conclusions: Our study revealed low TPT coverage among Georgian PWH and significant data gaps. Findings underscore the need to reevaluate the TPT care cascade, emphasizing improved record-keeping and reporting practices through an integrated electronic system. Enhancing access by integrating TPT into HIV care, reducing stigma through streamlined referrals, and strengthening healthcare worker training are critical to increasing TPT uptake and ultimately reducing TB morbidity and mortality among PWH in Georgia.
{"title":"Analysis of Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment Cascade Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Georgia: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Mariana Buziashvili, Davit Baliashvili, Akaki Abutidze, Nikoloz Chkhartishvili, Nestani Tukvadze, Otar Chokoshvili, Jack DeHovitz, Mamuka Djibuti","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf768","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is crucial for reducing tuberculosis (TB) incidence and related mortality among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); however, its implementation in Georgia faces challenges. In this study, we aimed to explore the TPT care cascade among people with HIV (PWH) in Georgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed-methods approach, we assessed TPT uptake, adherence, and impact on TB development within the 2019-2020 cohort of newly diagnosed PWH across 4 major HIV service providers in Georgia. With qualitative analysis under the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we identified barriers and facilitators to its implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1165 PWH, only 11.8% initiated TPT with isoniazid. Thirty-two developed active TB (incidence rate, 10/1000 person-years [95% confidence interval, 9.6-10.4]), none of whom received TPT. Only 43% of 137 PWH on TPT adhered for 3-6 months; 29 (21.1%) completed the full course. The study revealed poor TPT service coordination, worsened by major data limitations. Interviews identified several barriers to effective TPT implementation, summarized into 3 broad categories: the need for TPT service integration into HIV care, the potential development of an integrated electronic data system, and training gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed low TPT coverage among Georgian PWH and significant data gaps. Findings underscore the need to reevaluate the TPT care cascade, emphasizing improved record-keeping and reporting practices through an integrated electronic system. Enhancing access by integrating TPT into HIV care, reducing stigma through streamlined referrals, and strengthening healthcare worker training are critical to increasing TPT uptake and ultimately reducing TB morbidity and mortality among PWH in Georgia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf690
Alistair Thorpe, Rachael A Lee, Julia E Szymczak, Madeline C Farrell, Karen Howard, Brandi M Muller, Andrea T White, Angela Fagerlin, Valerie M Vaughn
Background: Adults aged ≥65 years are at high risk of harm from antibiotic misuse due to misdiagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) as urinary tract infection (UTI). Alongside strategies to improve prescribing, patients should be informed and empowered to discuss the harms/benefits of antibiotic treatment. We tested whether a patient-focused educational leaflet improved reported willingness to avoid antibiotics when not clinically necessary.
Methods: In an online randomized controlled survey experiment, US adult respondents aged ≥65 years read a scenario of themselves as an asymptomatic patient with a positive urine test before a nonurologic surgical procedure. They were assigned to 1 of 4 conditions, which varied by educational leaflet provision and surgeons' treatment recommendation for antibiotics. The primary outcome was respondents' comfort with not taking antibiotics for ASB. Secondary outcomes were reported misperceptions of ASB as UTI and knowledge.
Results: Of the 504 respondents (completion = 89%), the mean age was 72, 64.5% identified as male, 53.4% identified as Non-Hispanic White, and 35.7% reported prior antibiotic prescriptions for UTI. In response to the vignette, respondents shown the leaflet were more comfortable not taking antibiotics (P < .001), were less likely to misperceive ASB as a UTI (P < .001), and displayed greater knowledge (P < .001). Respondents told that the surgeon recommends antibiotics were less comfortable not taking antibiotics (P = .013) and more likely to misperceive ASB as UTI (P < .001).
Conclusions: In an online randomized controlled survey experiment, a patient-centered educational leaflet decreased reported desires to take antibiotics for ASB and improved knowledge among US adults age ≥65 years. Patient-focused education may prepare patients to engage in antibiotic treatment decisions.
{"title":"Impact of an Educational Leaflet About Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection on Antibiotic Preferences Among US Adults ≥65 Years: An Online Randomized Controlled Survey Experiment.","authors":"Alistair Thorpe, Rachael A Lee, Julia E Szymczak, Madeline C Farrell, Karen Howard, Brandi M Muller, Andrea T White, Angela Fagerlin, Valerie M Vaughn","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf690","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults aged ≥65 years are at high risk of harm from antibiotic misuse due to misdiagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) as urinary tract infection (UTI). Alongside strategies to improve prescribing, patients should be informed and empowered to discuss the harms/benefits of antibiotic treatment. We tested whether a patient-focused educational leaflet improved reported willingness to avoid antibiotics when not clinically necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an online randomized controlled survey experiment, US adult respondents aged ≥65 years read a scenario of themselves as an asymptomatic patient with a positive urine test before a nonurologic surgical procedure. They were assigned to 1 of 4 conditions, which varied by educational leaflet provision and surgeons' treatment recommendation for antibiotics. The primary outcome was respondents' comfort with not taking antibiotics for ASB. Secondary outcomes were reported misperceptions of ASB as UTI and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 504 respondents (completion = 89%), the mean age was 72, 64.5% identified as male, 53.4% identified as Non-Hispanic White, and 35.7% reported prior antibiotic prescriptions for UTI. In response to the vignette, respondents shown the leaflet were more comfortable not taking antibiotics (<i>P</i> < .001), were less likely to misperceive ASB as a UTI (<i>P</i> < .001), and displayed greater knowledge (<i>P</i> < .001). Respondents told that the surgeon recommends antibiotics were less comfortable not taking antibiotics (<i>P</i> = .013) and more likely to misperceive ASB as UTI (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an online randomized controlled survey experiment, a patient-centered educational leaflet decreased reported desires to take antibiotics for ASB and improved knowledge among US adults age ≥65 years. Patient-focused education may prepare patients to engage in antibiotic treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 12","pages":"ofaf690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12703713/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf722
Samantha Brace, Gustavo Rey Alvira-Arill, Aaron Hamby, Rachel Burgoon, Zachary Gruss, Taylor Morrisette, Alexandra Mills, Richard Lueking, Stephen Thacker, Krutika Mediwala Hornback
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) aim to optimize antimicrobial use through coordinated interventions that improve patient outcomes and reduce adverse events. While guidance exists from organizations including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, recommendations on effort allocation, working hours, and initiatives remain unclear.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey assessed the institutional structure, effort allocation, initiatives, and on-call participation of adult ASPs in the United States from September to October 2024. The survey was distributed via email to several ASP-related listservs. Respondents indicating on-call participation were also inquired about working hours, initiatives performed, participants, and compensation.
Results: Of 69 responses, most were from academic medical centers (59%) or community hospitals (35%), with 65% covering >500 beds. ASPs were often system-wide (78%) and primarily funded by their respective departments of pharmacy (87%). Common initiatives performed by all ASPs include answering ASP/infectious diseases questions, therapy de-escalation, and prospective audit and feedback. Twenty-four (69%) respondents indicated having an on-call model, with said programs reporting higher median inpatient full-time equivalents (FTEs) for physicians (0.5 vs 0.25) and pharmacists (2.9 vs 1.45) than those without. Commonly performed after-hours initiatives include preauthorization and answering microbiology inquiries. On-call coverage was generally performed during weekend daytimes and holidays, most often by pharmacists.
Conclusions: This survey highlights differences in structure, effort allocation, and initiatives of ASPs based on on-call participation. Institutions participating in on-call reported higher FTE assignments for physicians and pharmacists and were more likely to perform time-sensitive initiatives.
背景:抗菌素管理计划(asp)旨在通过协调干预措施优化抗菌素使用,改善患者预后并减少不良事件。虽然疾病控制与预防中心和美国传染病学会等组织提供了指导,但关于工作量分配、工作时间和举措的建议仍不明确。方法:本横断面调查评估了2024年9月至10月美国成人asp的制度结构、努力分配、主动性和随叫随到的参与情况。该调查通过电子邮件分发给几个asp相关的列表服务器。表示随叫随到的受访者还询问了工作时间、执行的计划、参与者和报酬。结果:在69份回复中,大多数来自学术医疗中心(59%)或社区医院(35%),65%覆盖bb500张床位。asp通常是全系统的(78%),主要由各自的药学部门资助(87%)。所有ASP执行的共同举措包括回答ASP/传染病问题,治疗降级以及前瞻性审计和反馈。24个(69%)受访者表示有随叫随到的模式,这些项目报告的医生(0.5 vs 0.25)和药剂师(2.9 vs 1.45)的住院全职等额(fte)中位数高于没有的项目。通常在下班后执行的活动包括预授权和回答微生物学询问。随叫随到的服务通常在周末白天和假日进行,通常由药剂师提供。结论:该调查强调了基于随叫随到参与的asp在结构、工作分配和主动性方面的差异。参与随叫随到制度的机构报告称,医生和药剂师的全职工作任务更高,而且更有可能执行对时间敏感的举措。
{"title":"Beyond the 9 to 5: A Cross-sectional Survey of Adult Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in the United States on Their Initiatives and Resources Based on On-call Model Participation.","authors":"Samantha Brace, Gustavo Rey Alvira-Arill, Aaron Hamby, Rachel Burgoon, Zachary Gruss, Taylor Morrisette, Alexandra Mills, Richard Lueking, Stephen Thacker, Krutika Mediwala Hornback","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf722","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf722","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) aim to optimize antimicrobial use through coordinated interventions that improve patient outcomes and reduce adverse events. While guidance exists from organizations including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, recommendations on effort allocation, working hours, and initiatives remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey assessed the institutional structure, effort allocation, initiatives, and on-call participation of adult ASPs in the United States from September to October 2024. The survey was distributed via email to several ASP-related listservs. Respondents indicating on-call participation were also inquired about working hours, initiatives performed, participants, and compensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 69 responses, most were from academic medical centers (59%) or community hospitals (35%), with 65% covering >500 beds. ASPs were often system-wide (78%) and primarily funded by their respective departments of pharmacy (87%). Common initiatives performed by all ASPs include answering ASP/infectious diseases questions, therapy de-escalation, and prospective audit and feedback. Twenty-four (69%) respondents indicated having an on-call model, with said programs reporting higher median inpatient full-time equivalents (FTEs) for physicians (0.5 vs 0.25) and pharmacists (2.9 vs 1.45) than those without. Commonly performed after-hours initiatives include preauthorization and answering microbiology inquiries. On-call coverage was generally performed during weekend daytimes and holidays, most often by pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights differences in structure, effort allocation, and initiatives of ASPs based on on-call participation. Institutions participating in on-call reported higher FTE assignments for physicians and pharmacists and were more likely to perform time-sensitive initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 12","pages":"ofaf722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12702616/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf741
L A Sibiya, T Abel, S Maistry, R Seedat, J Z Porterfield, Y Liang, E Evangelista, M Tyle, Y Saman, N Msomi
Background: Juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JoRRP) is a chronic, HPV-driven condition marked by recurrent airway papillomas. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and incidence of JoRRP and to identify clinical predictors of aggressive JoRRP.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of JoRRP patients treated at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital from 2012 to mid-2023. Demographics, patient HIV status, exposure to maternal HIV, frequency of surgical interventions, and extralaryngeal involvement were recorded.
Results: The cohort of 277 patients had a median diagnosis age of 4 years. The incidence of JoRRP was 3.82 per 100 000 live births (95% CI, 2.86-5.01), and prevalence was 4.17 per 100 000 population (95% CI, 3.47-4.97). Half of the study cohort met the criteria for aggressive disease (AD) (139; 50%). Children diagnosed at ≤2 years of age had higher odds of AD than older children, 3-5 years (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.78) and >5 years (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.54); both P < .001. Additionally, exposure to maternal HIV was significantly associated with pulmonary involvement (P = .03).
Conclusions: Early age at diagnosis and exposure to maternal HIV are potential predictors of aggressive JoRRP in high HIV-prevalence settings. These findings underscore the importance of integrated maternal-child healthcare, and robust public health interventions, such as expanded HPV vaccination and enhanced HIV prevention strategies, to reduce the clinical burden of JoRRP.
{"title":"Aggressive Juvenile-Onset Respiratory Papillomatosis in a High HIV Prevalence Setting: Clinical Predictors of Severity in South Africa.","authors":"L A Sibiya, T Abel, S Maistry, R Seedat, J Z Porterfield, Y Liang, E Evangelista, M Tyle, Y Saman, N Msomi","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf741","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JoRRP) is a chronic, HPV-driven condition marked by recurrent airway papillomas. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and incidence of JoRRP and to identify clinical predictors of aggressive JoRRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of JoRRP patients treated at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital from 2012 to mid-2023. Demographics, patient HIV status, exposure to maternal HIV, frequency of surgical interventions, and extralaryngeal involvement were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort of 277 patients had a median diagnosis age of 4 years. The incidence of JoRRP was 3.82 per 100 000 live births (95% CI, 2.86-5.01), and prevalence was 4.17 per 100 000 population (95% CI, 3.47-4.97). Half of the study cohort met the criteria for aggressive disease (AD) (139; 50%). Children diagnosed at ≤2 years of age had higher odds of AD than older children, 3-5 years (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.78) and >5 years (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.54); both <i>P</i> < .001. Additionally, exposure to maternal HIV was significantly associated with pulmonary involvement (<i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early age at diagnosis and exposure to maternal HIV are potential predictors of aggressive JoRRP in high HIV-prevalence settings. These findings underscore the importance of integrated maternal-child healthcare, and robust public health interventions, such as expanded HPV vaccination and enhanced HIV prevention strategies, to reduce the clinical burden of JoRRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750325/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf717
Rebekah W Moehring, Timothy P Gauthier
{"title":"Antimicrobial Stewards Must Aim for Balance in \"Going Beyond the 9 to 5\".","authors":"Rebekah W Moehring, Timothy P Gauthier","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf717","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf717","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 12","pages":"ofaf717"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12702657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145768512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf771
Moises A Huaman, Manuel G Feria, Michelle A Kendall, Ashley McKhann, Khuanchai Supparatpinyo, Claire A Chougnet, Xinyu Du, Frederick K Sawe, Kristine M Erlandson, Netanya S Utay, Michael M Lederman, Susan Swindells, Amita Gupta, Richard E Chaisson, Carl J Fichtenbaum
Background: Monocyte activation contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammation-driven comorbidities in people with HIV (PWH). We investigated the impact of tuberculin skin test (TST)/interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) status and tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) on monocyte activation in PWH.
Methods: We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from participants from the A5279/BRIEF-TB trial, which compared 1 month of rifapentine/isoniazid (1HP) versus 9 months of isoniazid (9H) as TPT in PWH. All included participants were on suppressive antiretroviral therapy and had available TST or IGRA results at study entry. Samples collected at week 0 (pre-TPT) and week 48 (post-TPT) were analyzed. Monocyte subset and activation markers were measured using multiparameter flow cytometry. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) were assessed after 6-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Linear regression models were used for primary comparisons of monocyte markers by TST/IGRA status, adjusted for age, sex, country, and CD4 count.
Results: In adjusted models, compared with TST/IGRA-negative participants (n = 27), TST/IGRA-positive participants (n = 30) had ∼2-fold relative increases in the median fluorescence intensity of CD64 (unstimulated) and CCR2 (post-LPS) on total monocytes and across monocyte subsets, pre- and post-TPT. Among TST/IGRA-positive participants, 1HP was associated with decreased fold changes over time for the percentage of CCR2+ monocytes and blunted IL-6/TNF-α responses compared with 9H.
Conclusions: PWH with a positive TST or IGRA exhibited signals of monocyte activation pre- and post-TPT. TPT with 1HP led to blunted proinflammatory monocyte changes compared with 9H.
{"title":"Monocyte Activation in People With HIV and Tuberculosis Coinfection and Effect of Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy: An Analysis of the ACTG A5279/BRIEF TB Trial.","authors":"Moises A Huaman, Manuel G Feria, Michelle A Kendall, Ashley McKhann, Khuanchai Supparatpinyo, Claire A Chougnet, Xinyu Du, Frederick K Sawe, Kristine M Erlandson, Netanya S Utay, Michael M Lederman, Susan Swindells, Amita Gupta, Richard E Chaisson, Carl J Fichtenbaum","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf771","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monocyte activation contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammation-driven comorbidities in people with HIV (PWH). We investigated the impact of tuberculin skin test (TST)/interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) status and tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) on monocyte activation in PWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from participants from the A5279/BRIEF-TB trial, which compared 1 month of rifapentine/isoniazid (1HP) versus 9 months of isoniazid (9H) as TPT in PWH. All included participants were on suppressive antiretroviral therapy and had available TST or IGRA results at study entry. Samples collected at week 0 (pre-TPT) and week 48 (post-TPT) were analyzed. Monocyte subset and activation markers were measured using multiparameter flow cytometry. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) were assessed after 6-hour lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Linear regression models were used for primary comparisons of monocyte markers by TST/IGRA status, adjusted for age, sex, country, and CD4 count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted models, compared with TST/IGRA-negative participants (<i>n</i> = 27), TST/IGRA-positive participants (<i>n</i> = 30) had ∼2-fold relative increases in the median fluorescence intensity of CD64 (unstimulated) and CCR2 (post-LPS) on total monocytes and across monocyte subsets, pre- and post-TPT. Among TST/IGRA-positive participants, 1HP was associated with decreased fold changes over time for the percentage of CCR2+ monocytes and blunted IL-6/TNF-α responses compared with 9H.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PWH with a positive TST or IGRA exhibited signals of monocyte activation pre- and post-TPT. TPT with 1HP led to blunted proinflammatory monocyte changes compared with 9H.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757864/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf770
Stormmy R Boettcher, Rachel M Kenney, Nathan A Everson, Surafel G Mulugeta, Anita B Shallal, Geehan Suleyman, Michael P Veve
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) coordination is challenging in multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO)-infected patients. The study purpose was to describe barriers and medication costs associated with OPAT utilizing therapies for MDRO.
Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort of hospitalized, MDRO-infected adults medically stable for discharge (MSDC) with an intended OPAT for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, eravacycline, meropenem/vaborbactam, or tigecycline from 1 January 2017 through 31 March 2025. Cohorts included patients who received an intended or modified OPAT regimen, defined as transition to alternative intravenous (IV)/oral therapy, in-hospital completion of IV therapy, or in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included post-MSDC medication costs, length of stay (LOS), and oral-switch therapy opportunities.
Results: One hundred-twenty patients were included; 29% received a modified OPAT regimen. β-lactams were the most intended OPAT regimen (67%). Patients with a modified OPAT regimen had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) medication costs ($4828 [$1209-$18 066] vs $1975 [$494-$4872], P < .001), more frequently experienced discharge delays ≥1 day (89% vs 66%, P = .011) and discharge referral disposition changes (40% vs 16%, P = .006), and had a prolonged median (IQR) LOS (20 [14-46] vs 13 [7-27] days, P= .023), compared to those who received an intended OPAT regimen. Oral-switch therapy opportunities were identified in 40% of patients. After adjusting for Medicaid, referral disposition changes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.21-9.89) and initial β-lactam therapy (aOR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55-10.79]) were associated with an increased odds of receiving a modified OPAT regimen.
Conclusions: Modified OPAT regimens are common and associated with increased costs, prolonged LOS, and discharge delays in MDRO-infected patients. These findings support the use of oral-switch therapy and improved care coordination.
背景:门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)协调是具有挑战性的多药耐药菌(MDRO)感染患者。本研究的目的是描述与OPAT使用MDRO疗法相关的障碍和药物费用。方法:这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2017年1月1日至2025年3月31日期间接受头孢地罗、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、头孢氯氮酮/他唑巴坦、依瓦环素、美罗培南/瓦波巴坦或替加环素预期OPAT治疗的住院、mdr感染的出院稳定成人。队列包括接受预定或修改的OPAT方案的患者,定义为过渡到替代静脉(IV)/口服治疗,院内完成静脉治疗或院内死亡。次要结局包括msdc后用药费用、住院时间(LOS)和口服转换治疗机会。结果:纳入120例患者;29%接受改良的OPAT方案。β-内酰胺类药物是最理想的OPAT方案(67%)。与接受预定OPAT方案的患者相比,改良OPAT方案患者的中位(四分位数范围[IQR])药物费用更高(4828美元[1209美元- 18066美元]vs 1975美元[494美元- 4872美元],P < 0.001),更频繁地经历出院延迟≥1天(89% vs 66%, P = 0.011)和出院转诊处置变化(40% vs 16%, P = 0.006),并且中位(IQR) LOS (20 [14-46] vs 13[7-27]天,P = 0.023)。在40%的患者中发现了口服转换治疗的机会。调整医疗补助后,转诊倾向的改变(调整优势比[aOR], 3.46[95%可信区间{CI}, 1.21-9.89])和初始β-内酰胺治疗(aOR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55-10.79])与接受改良OPAT方案的几率增加相关。结论:改良的OPAT方案在mdro感染患者中很常见,并且与成本增加、LOS延长和出院延迟相关。这些发现支持使用口服转换疗法和改善护理协调。
{"title":"Discharge Delays and Costs Associated With Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Stormmy R Boettcher, Rachel M Kenney, Nathan A Everson, Surafel G Mulugeta, Anita B Shallal, Geehan Suleyman, Michael P Veve","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf770","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) coordination is challenging in multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO)-infected patients. The study purpose was to describe barriers and medication costs associated with OPAT utilizing therapies for MDRO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort of hospitalized, MDRO-infected adults medically stable for discharge (MSDC) with an intended OPAT for cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, eravacycline, meropenem/vaborbactam, or tigecycline from 1 January 2017 through 31 March 2025. Cohorts included patients who received an intended or modified OPAT regimen, defined as transition to alternative intravenous (IV)/oral therapy, in-hospital completion of IV therapy, or in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included post-MSDC medication costs, length of stay (LOS), and oral-switch therapy opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred-twenty patients were included; 29% received a modified OPAT regimen. β-lactams were the most intended OPAT regimen (67%). Patients with a modified OPAT regimen had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) medication costs ($4828 [$1209-$18 066] vs $1975 [$494-$4872], <i>P</i> < .001), more frequently experienced discharge delays ≥1 day (89% vs 66%, <i>P</i> = .011) and discharge referral disposition changes (40% vs 16%, <i>P</i> = .006), and had a prolonged median (IQR) LOS (20 [14-46] vs 13 [7-27] days, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> .023), compared to those who received an intended OPAT regimen. Oral-switch therapy opportunities were identified in 40% of patients. After adjusting for Medicaid, referral disposition changes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.21-9.89) and initial β-lactam therapy (aOR, 4.08 [95% CI, 1.55-10.79]) were associated with an increased odds of receiving a modified OPAT regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified OPAT regimens are common and associated with increased costs, prolonged LOS, and discharge delays in MDRO-infected patients. These findings support the use of oral-switch therapy and improved care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf738
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf630.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf630.]。
{"title":"Correction to: Field Evaluation of Mobile Molecular Differential Tests in DRC and Nigeria.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf738","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf630.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 12","pages":"ofaf738"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12699995/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf749
Gaby Dashler, Kendall Maliszewski, Mustapha Saheed, Edana Mann, Nyah Johnson, Spencer J Mann, Tracy Colburn, William Clarke, Charlotte A Gaydos, Yukari C Manabe, K Davina Frick, Richard E Rothman, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Background: Point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a potential paradigm shift for emergency department (ED) management of patients with suspected STIs, given there are now Food and Drug Administration-cleared POC tests that permit definite rapid diagnosis and result-driven care.
Methods: A quasi-experimental real-world implementation study was conducted in an urban ED, comparing two approaches for female STI testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV): (1) central laboratory testing (August-November 2022) with batched nucleic acid amplification testing (CT/NG) and wet prep for TV; (2) POC PCR Testing Integration (ED POC) (January-April 2023) in an ED POC laboratory for all three STIs. We compared proportions of appropriate treatment and ED length of stay (LOS) between the two testing modalities using chi-square test and log-transformed multivariable linear regression, respectively.
Results: Of 627 patients, 340 received central laboratory testing and 287 received ED POC; ED POC resulted in a significant decrease in LOS by 76 minutes or 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.3% to -1.7%; P = .017). ED POC also significantly lowered overtreatment rates for CT (n = 595) and NG (n = 607) by 73% (95% CI, 44-87; P < .001) and 63% (95% CI, 28-81; P = .002), respectively. ED POC testing was associated with 67% lower rate of undertreatment (95% CI, -19% to 91%; P = .093) for any CT/NG/TV-positive (n = 78), but not statistically significant due to relatively small number of undertreated cases .
Discussion: Compared to traditional STI testing, POC PCR testing significantly shortened ED LOS, allowed for organism-specific targeted treatment, and reduced overtreatment of CT and NG infections.
{"title":"Real-world Use of Molecular Point-of-care Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) in the Emergency Department: Why It Matters for Acute Care Management.","authors":"Gaby Dashler, Kendall Maliszewski, Mustapha Saheed, Edana Mann, Nyah Johnson, Spencer J Mann, Tracy Colburn, William Clarke, Charlotte A Gaydos, Yukari C Manabe, K Davina Frick, Richard E Rothman, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf749","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care (POC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a potential paradigm shift for emergency department (ED) management of patients with suspected STIs, given there are now Food and Drug Administration-cleared POC tests that permit definite rapid diagnosis and result-driven care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental real-world implementation study was conducted in an urban ED, comparing two approaches for female STI testing for <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> (CT), <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> (NG), and <i>Trichomonas vaginalis</i> (TV): (1) central laboratory testing (August-November 2022) with batched nucleic acid amplification testing (CT/NG) and wet prep for TV; (2) POC PCR Testing Integration (ED POC) (January-April 2023) in an ED POC laboratory for all three STIs. We compared proportions of appropriate treatment and ED length of stay (LOS) between the two testing modalities using chi-square test and log-transformed multivariable linear regression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 627 patients, 340 received central laboratory testing and 287 received ED POC; ED POC resulted in a significant decrease in LOS by 76 minutes or 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.3% to -1.7%; <i>P</i> = .017). ED POC also significantly lowered overtreatment rates for CT (n = 595) and NG (n = 607) by 73% (95% CI, 44-87; <i>P</i> < .001) and 63% (95% CI, 28-81; <i>P</i> = .002), respectively. ED POC testing was associated with 67% lower rate of undertreatment (95% CI, -19% to 91%; <i>P</i> = .093) for any CT/NG/TV-positive (n = 78), but not statistically significant due to relatively small number of undertreated cases .</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to traditional STI testing, POC PCR testing significantly shortened ED LOS, allowed for organism-specific targeted treatment, and reduced overtreatment of CT and NG infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf747
Alexandre Alanio, P Lewis White, Maiken Cavling Arendrup, Alida Fe Talento, Cecile Torp Andersen, Elizabeth Johnson, Fanny Lanternier, Joseph Meletiadis, Karen M T Aastvad, Lize Cuypers, Oliver Kurzai, Reinhild Strauss, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Sharon Chen, Paul E Verweij, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo
Fungal pathogens and the infections they cause are notoriously understudied and underrepresented in public health surveillance programs. Recent initiatives, such as that of the Joint Programming Initiative on Anti-Microbial Resistance (JPIAMR), recognize these gaps and have supported the development of a fungal surveillance resistance network. The International Fungal Network for One-Health Resistance Surveillance: Antifungal Resistance (INFORM-AFR) network sought to enhance understanding of existing surveillance programs, with the ultimate goal of developing standardized fungal surveillance strategies that enable international comparisons. A survey was conducted involving mycology reference centers or public health institutes (n = 15) from 12 countries, each responsible for nationwide or regional surveillance programs on fungal infections or pathogens. The ongoing programs were heterogenous, not only in terms of the epidemiological focus of surveillance (pathogen vs disease based), but also in relation to the mycological procedures used (identification and antifungal susceptibility testing methods). Funding dedicated to surveillance was variable and often lacked long-term stability, resulting in suboptimal surveillance data in many centers and limiting the generation of accurate and consistent knowledge. With the expanding number of fungal disease cases and increasing reports of antifungal resistance, we strongly advocate for improved integration of fungal infections into nationwide health surveillance programs as well as international standardization.
{"title":"Antifungal Resistance Surveillance: Insights From National Mycology Reference Centers and Expert Mycology Laboratories.","authors":"Alexandre Alanio, P Lewis White, Maiken Cavling Arendrup, Alida Fe Talento, Cecile Torp Andersen, Elizabeth Johnson, Fanny Lanternier, Joseph Meletiadis, Karen M T Aastvad, Lize Cuypers, Oliver Kurzai, Reinhild Strauss, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Sharon Chen, Paul E Verweij, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf747","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungal pathogens and the infections they cause are notoriously understudied and underrepresented in public health surveillance programs. Recent initiatives, such as that of the Joint Programming Initiative on Anti-Microbial Resistance (JPIAMR), recognize these gaps and have supported the development of a fungal surveillance resistance network. The International Fungal Network for One-Health Resistance Surveillance: Antifungal Resistance (INFORM-AFR) network sought to enhance understanding of existing surveillance programs, with the ultimate goal of developing standardized fungal surveillance strategies that enable international comparisons. A survey was conducted involving mycology reference centers or public health institutes (n = 15) from 12 countries, each responsible for nationwide or regional surveillance programs on fungal infections or pathogens. The ongoing programs were heterogenous, not only in terms of the epidemiological focus of surveillance (pathogen vs disease based), but also in relation to the mycological procedures used (identification and antifungal susceptibility testing methods). Funding dedicated to surveillance was variable and often lacked long-term stability, resulting in suboptimal surveillance data in many centers and limiting the generation of accurate and consistent knowledge. With the expanding number of fungal disease cases and increasing reports of antifungal resistance, we strongly advocate for improved integration of fungal infections into nationwide health surveillance programs as well as international standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 1","pages":"ofaf747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12740717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}