首页 > 最新文献

Psychological Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Compliance and response consistency in a lengthy intensive longitudinal data protocol. 冗长密集的纵向数据协议中的遵从性和响应一致性。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001332
Alexander W Sokolovsky, Rachel L Gunn, Andrea M Wycoff, Holly K Boyle, Helene R White, Kristina M Jackson

Research on real-world patterns of substance use increasingly involves intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collection, requiring long assessment windows. The present study extends limited prior research examining event- and person-level influences on compliance and response consistency by investigating how these behaviors are sustained over time in an ILD study of alcohol and cannabis co-use in college students. Participants (n = 316) completed two 28-day bursts of ILD comprising five daily surveys, which included a morning survey of prior-day drinking. We used linear mixed effects models in a multilevel interrupted time series framework to evaluate the associations of time and measurement burst with (a) noncompliance (count of missed surveys) and (b) response consistency (difference between same-day report of drinking and morning report of prior-day drinking). We observed that time was positively associated with noncompliance, with no discontinuity associated with measurement burst. The slope of time was more positive in the second burst. Neither time nor measurement burst were significantly associated with consistent reporting. However, survey nonresponse and consistency of responding appeared to be impacted by the same-day use of substances. Overall, compliance decreased while consistency was stable across the duration of a lengthy ILD protocol. Shorter assessment windows or adaptive prompting strategies may improve overall study compliance. Further work examining daily burden and context is needed to inform future ILD design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

对现实世界中药物使用模式的研究越来越多地涉及密集纵向数据(ILD)收集,这需要较长的评估时间。本研究通过对大学生共同使用酒精和大麻的 ILD 研究,探讨了这些行为是如何随着时间的推移而持续的,从而扩展了之前对事件和个人层面对依从性和反应一致性影响的有限研究。参与者(n = 316)完成了两次为期 28 天的 ILD 连续调查,包括五次每日调查,其中包括一次关于前一天饮酒情况的晨间调查。我们在多层次中断时间序列框架下使用线性混合效应模型来评估时间和测量时间段与(a)不遵守情况(错过的调查次数)和(b)响应一致性(当天报告的饮酒量与早晨报告的前一天饮酒量之间的差异)之间的关系。我们观察到,时间与不依从性呈正相关,与测量时间间隔没有不连续性。时间的斜率在第二次测量时更为正相关。时间和测量间隔都与报告的一致性无明显关系。然而,调查的未回复性和回复的一致性似乎会受到当天使用药物的影响。总体而言,在漫长的 ILD 方案持续时间内,依从性下降,而一致性保持稳定。缩短评估窗口期或采取适应性提示策略可能会提高研究的整体依从性。还需要进一步研究日常负担和环境,为未来的 ILD 设计提供参考。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Compliance and response consistency in a lengthy intensive longitudinal data protocol.","authors":"Alexander W Sokolovsky, Rachel L Gunn, Andrea M Wycoff, Holly K Boyle, Helene R White, Kristina M Jackson","doi":"10.1037/pas0001332","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on real-world patterns of substance use increasingly involves intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collection, requiring long assessment windows. The present study extends limited prior research examining event- and person-level influences on compliance and response consistency by investigating how these behaviors are sustained over time in an ILD study of alcohol and cannabis co-use in college students. Participants (<i>n</i> = 316) completed two 28-day bursts of ILD comprising five daily surveys, which included a morning survey of prior-day drinking. We used linear mixed effects models in a multilevel interrupted time series framework to evaluate the associations of time and measurement burst with (a) noncompliance (count of missed surveys) and (b) response consistency (difference between same-day report of drinking and morning report of prior-day drinking). We observed that time was positively associated with noncompliance, with no discontinuity associated with measurement burst. The slope of time was more positive in the second burst. Neither time nor measurement burst were significantly associated with consistent reporting. However, survey nonresponse and consistency of responding appeared to be impacted by the same-day use of substances. Overall, compliance decreased while consistency was stable across the duration of a lengthy ILD protocol. Shorter assessment windows or adaptive prompting strategies may improve overall study compliance. Further work examining daily burden and context is needed to inform future ILD design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"606-617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome-Clinical Interview (CDS-CI): Psychometric support for caregiver and youth versions. 认知脱离综合症临床访谈(CDS-CI):护理人员和青少年版本的心理计量学支持。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001330
Stephen P Becker, Nicholas C Dunn, Joseph W Fredrick, Keith McBurnett, Leanne Tamm, G Leonard Burns

Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS), formerly termed sluggish cognitive tempo, is a set of symptoms characterized by excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and slowed behavior/thinking. CDS is distinct from symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other psychopathologies and uniquely associated with functional impairment. However, despite significant progress in developing and evaluating rating scale measures of CDS, no clinical interview of CDS exists with established psychometric properties that can facilitate a multimethod approach assessing CDS. Accordingly, the present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the semistructured Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome-Clinical Interview (CDS-CI). The CDS-CI and the ADHD inattention (ADHD-IN) and hyperactive-impulsivity (ADHD-HI) modules from the Kiddie Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS) were administered to a sample of early adolescents (N = 341, ages 10-12 years) and their caregivers. Adolescents and caregivers also completed rating scale measures of CDS and ADHD symptoms. The CDS-CI demonstrated high internal consistency and interrater reliability. CDS-CI scores showed excellent same-source discriminant validity from K-SADS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI scores and encouraging convergent and discriminant validity with rating scale measures, especially for caregivers. Above and beyond K-SADS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI scores, higher parent and adolescent CDS-CI scores were both significantly associated with greater functional impairment. A threshold of ≥ 6 out of 15 symptoms was selected as an initial threshold for determining clinically elevated CDS using the CDS-CI. Findings provide psychometric support for the CDS-CI as a tool in the multimethod assessment of CDS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

认知脱离综合症(CDS),以前称为认知节奏迟缓症,是一组以过度做白日梦、精神混乱和行为/思维迟缓为特征的症状。脱离综合症有别于注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和其他精神病症的症状,而且与功能障碍有着独特的联系。然而,尽管在开发和评估 CDS 评定量表测量方法方面取得了重大进展,但目前还没有一种 CDS 临床访谈具有成熟的心理测量学特性,可以促进采用多种方法评估 CDS。因此,本研究评估了半结构化认知分离综合征临床访谈(CDS-CI)的心理测量特性。本研究对早期青少年样本(341 人,10-12 岁)及其照护者进行了 CDS-CI 以及学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症 Kiddie 附表(K-SADS)中的注意力不集中(ADHD-IN)和多动冲动(ADHD-HI)模块的测试。青少年和照顾者还完成了 CDS 和多动症状的评分量表测量。CDS-CI显示出较高的内部一致性和互测可靠性。CDS-CI 分数与 K-SADS、ADHD-IN 和 ADHD-HI 分数具有极好的同源判别效度,与评分量表测量具有令人鼓舞的收敛效度和判别效度,尤其是对照顾者而言。除了K-SADS、ADHD-IN和ADHD-HI得分之外,家长和青少年的CDS-CI得分越高,其功能损害越严重。使用 CDS-CI 确定临床 CDS 升高的初始阈值为 15 个症状中≥ 6 个。研究结果为将 CDS-CI 作为 CDS 多方法评估工具提供了心理计量学支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome-Clinical Interview (CDS-CI): Psychometric support for caregiver and youth versions.","authors":"Stephen P Becker, Nicholas C Dunn, Joseph W Fredrick, Keith McBurnett, Leanne Tamm, G Leonard Burns","doi":"10.1037/pas0001330","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS), formerly termed sluggish cognitive tempo, is a set of symptoms characterized by excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and slowed behavior/thinking. CDS is distinct from symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other psychopathologies and uniquely associated with functional impairment. However, despite significant progress in developing and evaluating rating scale measures of CDS, no clinical interview of CDS exists with established psychometric properties that can facilitate a multimethod approach assessing CDS. Accordingly, the present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the semistructured Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome-Clinical Interview (CDS-CI). The CDS-CI and the ADHD inattention (ADHD-IN) and hyperactive-impulsivity (ADHD-HI) modules from the Kiddie Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS) were administered to a sample of early adolescents (<i>N</i> = 341, ages 10-12 years) and their caregivers. Adolescents and caregivers also completed rating scale measures of CDS and ADHD symptoms. The CDS-CI demonstrated high internal consistency and interrater reliability. CDS-CI scores showed excellent same-source discriminant validity from K-SADS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI scores and encouraging convergent and discriminant validity with rating scale measures, especially for caregivers. Above and beyond K-SADS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI scores, higher parent and adolescent CDS-CI scores were both significantly associated with greater functional impairment. A threshold of ≥ 6 out of 15 symptoms was selected as an initial threshold for determining clinically elevated CDS using the CDS-CI. Findings provide psychometric support for the CDS-CI as a tool in the multimethod assessment of CDS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"618-630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposing a more conservative Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index cutoff score for forensic inpatient populations. 为法医住院病人提出更保守的神经心理状态评估可重复电池(RBANS)努力指数临界值。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001333
Shelby Hunter, Amanda A Partika, Stephen R Nitch

The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index (EI) may be unreliable at its standard recommended cutoff score when used with forensic psychiatric inpatient populations given high rates of genuine cognitive impairment. The present study sought to (a) examine the rate of invalid performance on the RBANS EI using the standard cutoff among incompetent to stand trial (IST) inpatients and (b) investigate the psychometric properties of the RBANS EI at various cutoff scores. This study was conducted using archival assessment data collected at a large forensic psychiatric hospital. Across the entire sample (N = 238, 79% male, Mage = 45 years, 24% primary Spanish-speaking), 79% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Experiment 1 of the study (n = 165) contained IST patients who were classified as having a valid presentation. Experiment 2 contained a valid (n = 46) and invalid (n = 27) presentation group comprised of postadjudication and IST inpatients, respectively. In Experiment 1, over one third (36.4%) of the valid presentation sample scored above the standard recommended EI cutoff. In Experiment 2, applying the standard recommended cutoff score of > 3 was associated with a false positive rate of over 20%. Obtaining < 10% false positive errors was achieved at a cutoff score of > 5. At this cutoff score, the estimated local base rate of invalid responding among IST patients was 28%. Clinical and forensic implications and recommendations for adopting this more conservative RBANS EI cutoff score are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

神经心理状态评估可重复性电池(RBANS)努力指数(EI)在法医精神病住院患者中使用时,其标准推荐临界值可能并不可靠,因为真正的认知障碍发生率很高。本研究旨在:(a) 检验无受审能力(IST)住院患者在使用 RBANS EI 标准截断值时的无效表现率;(b) 调查不同截断值下 RBANS EI 的心理计量特性。本研究使用的是一家大型法医精神病院收集的档案评估数据。在所有样本中(N = 238,79% 为男性,年龄 = 45 岁,24% 主要讲西班牙语),79% 被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍。研究的实验 1(n = 165)包含被归类为有效陈述的 IST 患者。实验 2 包括有效陈述组(n = 46)和无效陈述组(n = 27),分别由判决后患者和 IST 住院患者组成。在实验 1 中,超过三分之一(36.4%)的有效陈述样本得分高于标准推荐 EI 临界值。在实验 2 中,采用标准推荐分界值大于 3 时,假阳性率超过 20%。当临界值大于 5 时,误判率小于 10%。在此临界值下,估计 IST 患者的无效应答率为 28%。本文讨论了采用这一更为保守的 RBANS EI 临界分值的临床和法医意义及建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Proposing a more conservative Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index cutoff score for forensic inpatient populations.","authors":"Shelby Hunter, Amanda A Partika, Stephen R Nitch","doi":"10.1037/pas0001333","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index (EI) may be unreliable at its standard recommended cutoff score when used with forensic psychiatric inpatient populations given high rates of genuine cognitive impairment. The present study sought to (a) examine the rate of invalid performance on the RBANS EI using the standard cutoff among incompetent to stand trial (IST) inpatients and (b) investigate the psychometric properties of the RBANS EI at various cutoff scores. This study was conducted using archival assessment data collected at a large forensic psychiatric hospital. Across the entire sample (<i>N</i> = 238, 79% male, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 45 years, 24% primary Spanish-speaking), 79% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Experiment 1 of the study (<i>n</i> = 165) contained IST patients who were classified as having a valid presentation. Experiment 2 contained a valid (<i>n</i> = 46) and invalid (<i>n</i> = 27) presentation group comprised of postadjudication and IST inpatients, respectively. In Experiment 1, over one third (36.4%) of the valid presentation sample scored above the standard recommended EI cutoff. In Experiment 2, applying the standard recommended cutoff score of > 3 was associated with a false positive rate of over 20%. Obtaining < 10% false positive errors was achieved at a cutoff score of > 5. At this cutoff score, the estimated local base rate of invalid responding among IST patients was 28%. Clinical and forensic implications and recommendations for adopting this more conservative RBANS EI cutoff score are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"585-594"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk to reoffend changes over time: Improving correctional programming through progress monitoring. 重新犯罪的风险会随着时间的推移而变化:通过进度监测改进教养计划。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001335
Kelly M Babchishin, R Karl Hanson, Seung C Lee

Progress monitoring is integral to evidence-based practice. Correctional settings, especially the supervision of individuals who commit sexual offenses, elicit public concern; negative outcomes can be catastrophic. Using a prospective longitudinal study of 2,939 men with a history of sexual offenses undergoing community supervision, we examined different models of progress monitoring and how they should inform the assessment of risk for sexual recidivism. We found that the most recent assessment scores of the ACUTE-2007 and STABLE-2007 sexual recidivism risk tools provided the best information about reoffending risk compared to using (a) the worst period of adjustments (i.e., highest risk score), (b) the best period of adjustments (i.e., lowest risk score), or (c) a rolling average of scores. We also found that the latest STABLE-2007 scores incrementally predicted sexual recidivism beyond baseline risk as assessed by demographic and criminal history variables (Static-99R). We conclude that the risk for sexual recidivism changes over time and that community corrections is advanced by repeated assessment of dynamic (changeable) risk factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

进展监测是循证实践不可或缺的一部分。矫正环境,尤其是对性犯罪人员的监管,引起了公众的关注;负面结果可能是灾难性的。通过对 2939 名接受社区监管的有性犯罪史的男性进行前瞻性纵向研究,我们考察了不同的进展监测模式,以及这些模式应如何为性犯罪再犯风险评估提供信息。我们发现,与使用(a)最差调整期(即最高风险分值)、(b)最佳调整期(即最低风险分值)或(c)滚动平均分值相比,ACUTE-2007 和 STABLE-2007 性再犯风险工具的最新评估分值提供了有关再犯风险的最佳信息。我们还发现,STABLE-2007 的最新分值对性累犯的预测超出了人口统计学和犯罪史变量(Static-99R)所评估的基线风险。我们的结论是,性犯罪累犯的风险会随着时间的推移而变化,通过反复评估动态(可变化的)风险因素,可以推进社区矫正工作。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Risk to reoffend changes over time: Improving correctional programming through progress monitoring.","authors":"Kelly M Babchishin, R Karl Hanson, Seung C Lee","doi":"10.1037/pas0001335","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progress monitoring is integral to evidence-based practice. Correctional settings, especially the supervision of individuals who commit sexual offenses, elicit public concern; negative outcomes can be catastrophic. Using a prospective longitudinal study of 2,939 men with a history of sexual offenses undergoing community supervision, we examined different models of progress monitoring and how they should inform the assessment of risk for sexual recidivism. We found that the most recent assessment scores of the ACUTE-2007 and STABLE-2007 sexual recidivism risk tools provided the best information about reoffending risk compared to using (a) the worst period of adjustments (i.e., highest risk score), (b) the best period of adjustments (i.e., lowest risk score), or (c) a rolling average of scores. We also found that the latest STABLE-2007 scores incrementally predicted sexual recidivism beyond baseline risk as assessed by demographic and criminal history variables (Static-99R). We conclude that the risk for sexual recidivism changes over time and that community corrections is advanced by repeated assessment of dynamic (changeable) risk factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"595-605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Everyday Wellbeing Appraisal Scale: Assessing a type of subjective well-being uniquely associated with health behavior in people with hypertension. 日常幸福感评估量表:评估一种与高血压患者健康行为独特相关的主观幸福感。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001336
Keith Sanford, Gary Elkins

Everyday well-being appraisals are judgments about the goodness of recent daily life events. These appraisals are expected to be distinct from other types of well-being involving traits, affect, and psychological distress and expected to be uniquely important for understanding health behavior such as exercise, diet, and treatment adherence for people with medical conditions. To develop and test a new Everyday Wellbeing Appraisal Scale, two studies were conducted in which a total of 718 people with hypertension completed online questionnaires. In Study 1, to achieve maximum validity with the fewest number of items, an empirical analysis was used to select a set of six items with high discrimination that incorporated multiple types of response-option formats. In Study 2, the scale's unidimensional factor structure and high discrimination were confirmed, and the new scale outperformed several existing types of well-being scales in its ability to explain unique variance in health behavior criterion variables. Specifically, it explained unique variance in health behavior after controlling for a widely used measure assessing trait-level reflections of well-being, as well as measures of positive affect and two types of psychological distress. Also, when compared to the trait-level measure of well-being, the new scale demonstrated less overlap with affect and psychological distress. These results suggest that this brief, new scale is valuable for assessing a distinct construct that is especially salient for understanding health behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

日常幸福感评价是对近期日常生活事件好坏的判断。这些评价与涉及特征、情感和心理困扰的其他类型的幸福感不同,对于理解健康行为(如运动、饮食和坚持治疗)具有独特的重要性。为了开发和测试新的日常幸福感评估量表,我们进行了两项研究,共有 718 名高血压患者完成了在线问卷调查。在研究 1 中,为了用最少的项目达到最大的效度,我们采用了经验分析法来选择一组具有高区分度的六个项目,其中包含多种类型的回答选项格式。在研究 2 中,量表的单维因子结构和高区分度得到了证实,新量表在解释健康行为标准变量的独特变异方面优于现有的几种幸福感量表。具体来说,在控制了一种广泛使用的评估幸福感特质水平反映的量表以及积极情感和两种心理困扰的量表之后,新量表还能解释健康行为的独特变异。此外,与幸福感的特质水平测量相比,新量表与情感和心理困扰的重叠较少。这些结果表明,这个简短的新量表对于评估一个独特的结构很有价值,而这个结构对于理解健康行为尤为重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"The Everyday Wellbeing Appraisal Scale: Assessing a type of subjective well-being uniquely associated with health behavior in people with hypertension.","authors":"Keith Sanford, Gary Elkins","doi":"10.1037/pas0001336","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Everyday well-being appraisals are judgments about the goodness of recent daily life events. These appraisals are expected to be distinct from other types of well-being involving traits, affect, and psychological distress and expected to be uniquely important for understanding health behavior such as exercise, diet, and treatment adherence for people with medical conditions. To develop and test a new Everyday Wellbeing Appraisal Scale, two studies were conducted in which a total of 718 people with hypertension completed online questionnaires. In Study 1, to achieve maximum validity with the fewest number of items, an empirical analysis was used to select a set of six items with high discrimination that incorporated multiple types of response-option formats. In Study 2, the scale's unidimensional factor structure and high discrimination were confirmed, and the new scale outperformed several existing types of well-being scales in its ability to explain unique variance in health behavior criterion variables. Specifically, it explained unique variance in health behavior after controlling for a widely used measure assessing trait-level reflections of well-being, as well as measures of positive affect and two types of psychological distress. Also, when compared to the trait-level measure of well-being, the new scale demonstrated less overlap with affect and psychological distress. These results suggest that this brief, new scale is valuable for assessing a distinct construct that is especially salient for understanding health behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"631-642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141889996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R). 人格组织结构访谈-修订版(STIPO-R)中文版的信度和效度。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001324
Yang Yang, Emanuele Preti, Jia Hu, Shuangyi Chen, Yuan Wang, Shanshan Su, Wenhui Jiang, Wenqing Zhao, Jing Tao, John F Clarkin, Jianyin Qiu

With the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a set of dimensional criteria was added as an emerging alternative model to the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Parallel to this, within the object relations conceptualization of personality pathology, a structured interview, the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), was developed to assess pathological personality and then revised (STIPO-R). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the STIPO-R were tested on a sample of 236 Chinese participants, including both psychiatric patients and healthy individuals. Overall, the STIPO-R showed good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and generally satisfactory results in structure and convergent validity. The STIPO-R also demonstrated discriminant validity (healthy individuals vs. psychiatric patients with PD vs. psychiatric patients without PD). Results are also discussed in light of cultural differences between Chinese and Western cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

随着《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的出版,增加了一套维度标准,作为人格障碍(PD)诊断的新兴替代模式;美国精神病学协会,2013 年)。与此同时,在人格病理学的客体关系概念化中,开发了一种结构化访谈--人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO),用于评估病态人格,并对其进行了修订(STIPO-R)。本研究在 236 名中国受试者(包括精神病患者和健康人)中测试了 STIPO-R 中文版的信度和效度。总体而言,STIPO-R 显示出良好的内部一致性、施测者间信度和测验重复信度,在结构效度和收敛效度方面也取得了令人满意的结果。STIPO-R 还表现出了区分效度(健康人 vs. 患有帕金森病的精神病人 vs. 未患帕金森病的精神病人)。此外,还结合中西方文化差异对结果进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization-Revised (STIPO-R).","authors":"Yang Yang, Emanuele Preti, Jia Hu, Shuangyi Chen, Yuan Wang, Shanshan Su, Wenhui Jiang, Wenqing Zhao, Jing Tao, John F Clarkin, Jianyin Qiu","doi":"10.1037/pas0001324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the publication of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a set of dimensional criteria was added as an emerging alternative model to the diagnosis of personality disorder (PD; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Parallel to this, within the object relations conceptualization of personality pathology, a structured interview, the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), was developed to assess pathological personality and then revised (STIPO-R). In this study, the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the STIPO-R were tested on a sample of 236 Chinese participants, including both psychiatric patients and healthy individuals. Overall, the STIPO-R showed good internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and generally satisfactory results in structure and convergent validity. The STIPO-R also demonstrated discriminant validity (healthy individuals vs. psychiatric patients with PD vs. psychiatric patients without PD). Results are also discussed in light of cultural differences between Chinese and Western cultures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"36 9","pages":"e27-e37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142293987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement invariance of the higher-order model of Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) across child age, gender, parental anxiety, and pandemic period in England. 学前焦虑量表(PAS)高阶模型在儿童年龄、性别、父母焦虑程度和英国大流行时期的测量不变性。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001325
Siyu Zhou, Cathy Creswell, Susan H Spence, Tessa Reardon

The Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) is a parent-report scale measuring young children's anxiety symptoms involving five specific anxiety symptoms (separation anxiety, physical injury fears, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety) that load on a higher-order factor representing general anxiety shared by all specific anxiety symptom subtypes. Although the PAS has been widely used to assess anxiety symptoms in young children, few studies have tested its measurement invariance for group comparisons. Using data from a sample of 2,221 children and their parents/carers in the United Kingdom, this study investigated the measurement invariance of the higher-order model of the PAS across child age (4-6 years vs. 6-7 years), gender (girls vs. boys), parental anxiety (low vs. high level), and children's living circumstances (before vs. after the removal of COVID-19 restrictions). Our findings demonstrated the good factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the higher-order model of the PAS in all subgroups and supported its configural, metric, and scalar invariance across these subgroups. Therefore, the findings suggest that the PAS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing specific anxiety symptoms and general anxiety among young children in the United Kingdom and that comparisons can be made between the subgroups under examination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

学龄前焦虑量表(PAS)是一种家长报告量表,用于测量幼儿的焦虑症状,其中涉及五种特定的焦虑症状(分离焦虑、身体伤害恐惧、社交恐惧症、强迫症和广泛性焦虑),这些焦虑症状会被加载到一个高阶因子上,该因子代表所有特定焦虑症状亚型共有的普遍焦虑。虽然 PAS 已被广泛用于评估幼儿的焦虑症状,但很少有研究对其进行群体比较的测量不变性测试。本研究使用英国 2221 名儿童及其父母/照看者的样本数据,调查了 PAS 高阶模型在不同儿童年龄(4-6 岁与 6-7 岁)、性别(女孩与男孩)、父母焦虑程度(低水平与高水平)和儿童生活环境(取消 COVID-19 限制前与取消 COVID-19 限制后)下的测量不变性。我们的研究结果表明,PAS 的高阶模型在所有亚组中都具有良好的因子结构、内部一致性和收敛有效性,并支持其在这些亚组中的构型、度量和标度不变性。因此,研究结果表明,PAS 是一种可靠有效的工具,可用于评估英国幼儿的特定焦虑症状和一般焦虑,并可在所研究的亚组之间进行比较。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Measurement invariance of the higher-order model of Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) across child age, gender, parental anxiety, and pandemic period in England.","authors":"Siyu Zhou, Cathy Creswell, Susan H Spence, Tessa Reardon","doi":"10.1037/pas0001325","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Preschool Anxiety Scale (PAS) is a parent-report scale measuring young children's anxiety symptoms involving five specific anxiety symptoms (separation anxiety, physical injury fears, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety) that load on a higher-order factor representing general anxiety shared by all specific anxiety symptom subtypes. Although the PAS has been widely used to assess anxiety symptoms in young children, few studies have tested its measurement invariance for group comparisons. Using data from a sample of 2,221 children and their parents/carers in the United Kingdom, this study investigated the measurement invariance of the higher-order model of the PAS across child age (4-6 years vs. 6-7 years), gender (girls vs. boys), parental anxiety (low vs. high level), and children's living circumstances (before vs. after the removal of COVID-19 restrictions). Our findings demonstrated the good factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the higher-order model of the PAS in all subgroups and supported its configural, metric, and scalar invariance across these subgroups. Therefore, the findings suggest that the PAS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing specific anxiety symptoms and general anxiety among young children in the United Kingdom and that comparisons can be made between the subgroups under examination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"526-537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reexamining gender differences and the transdiagnostic boundaries of various conceptualizations of perseverative cognition. 重新审视性别差异和毅力认知各种概念的跨诊断界限。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001326
Chrystal Vergara-Lopez, Evelyn M Hernandez Valencia, Milagros Grados, Esteban Ortiz, Jodi Sutherland Charvis, Hector I Lopez-Vergara

Research examining gender differences in perseverative cognition (repetitive, negative, and difficult-to-control thoughts) has focused on depressive rumination and internalizing syndromes. This study examines the transdiagnostic role of depressive rumination, anger rumination, and repetitive negative thinking across gender on internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Utilizing an ethnoracially diverse sample (33% Black, 35% Latinx, 32% White non-Hispanic) of n = 1,187 young adults (49.5% women), we found equivalent instrument functioning across gender for depressive rumination (specifically brooding), anger rumination, and internalizing problems. Differential item functioning was found for repetitive negative thinking and externalizing problems; partial metric and scalar invariance were established for repetitive negative thinking, and partial metric invariance was established for externalizing problems. After accounting for bias in measurement, women engaged in more perseverative cognition, though effects were small for brooding and anger rumination and large for repetitive negative thinking. Different types of perseverations were positively associated with internalizing and externalizing symptoms across gender. Perseverative cognition may be a transdiagnostic mechanism beyond internalizing problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

有关坚持性认知(重复、消极和难以控制的想法)性别差异的研究主要集中在抑郁反刍和内化综合症上。本研究探讨了抑郁反刍、愤怒反刍和重复性消极思维在不同性别间对内化和外化症状的跨诊断作用。我们使用了一个种族多元化样本(33% 黑人、35% 拉美裔、32% 非西班牙裔白人),样本中有 1,187 名年轻成年人(49.5% 为女性),我们发现不同性别在抑郁反刍(特别是耿耿于怀)、愤怒反刍和内化问题上的工具功能是相同的。在重复性消极思考和外化问题上,我们发现了不同的项目功能;在重复性消极思考上,建立了部分公制和标度不变性;在外化问题上,建立了部分公制不变性。在考虑了测量偏差后,女性有更多的锲而不舍的认知,尽管对耿耿于怀和愤怒反刍的影响较小,但对重复性消极思维的影响较大。不同类型的锲而不舍与不同性别的内化和外化症状呈正相关。锲而不舍的认知可能是超越内化问题的一种跨诊断机制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Reexamining gender differences and the transdiagnostic boundaries of various conceptualizations of perseverative cognition.","authors":"Chrystal Vergara-Lopez, Evelyn M Hernandez Valencia, Milagros Grados, Esteban Ortiz, Jodi Sutherland Charvis, Hector I Lopez-Vergara","doi":"10.1037/pas0001326","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research examining gender differences in perseverative cognition (repetitive, negative, and difficult-to-control thoughts) has focused on depressive rumination and internalizing syndromes. This study examines the transdiagnostic role of depressive rumination, anger rumination, and repetitive negative thinking across gender on internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Utilizing an ethnoracially diverse sample (33% Black, 35% Latinx, 32% White non-Hispanic) of <i>n</i> = 1,187 young adults (49.5% women), we found equivalent instrument functioning across gender for depressive rumination (specifically brooding), anger rumination, and internalizing problems. Differential item functioning was found for repetitive negative thinking and externalizing problems; partial metric and scalar invariance were established for repetitive negative thinking, and partial metric invariance was established for externalizing problems. After accounting for bias in measurement, women engaged in more perseverative cognition, though effects were small for brooding and anger rumination and large for repetitive negative thinking. Different types of perseverations were positively associated with internalizing and externalizing symptoms across gender. Perseverative cognition may be a transdiagnostic mechanism beyond internalizing problems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"538-551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416118/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Latent structure and measurement invariance of the Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children across sex and age. 不同性别和年龄儿童抑郁自评量表的潜在结构和测量不变性。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001327
Haley E Green, Lindsay N Gabel, Emma K Stewart, Yuliya Kotelnikova, Elizabeth P Hayden

Measurement tools from which valid interpretations can be made are critical for assessing early emerging depressive symptoms, as depressive symptoms in childhood are associated with increased risk for early-onset depressive disorder, recurrence, suicidality, and other psychopathology. The Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children (DSRS) is a widely used self-report scale assessing youth depressive symptoms. The relatively few studies investigating the DSRS' latent structure have yielded mixed results, and measurement invariance (MI) based on sex and age has not been examined. We examined the factor structure and MI of the DSRS across sex and age in a community sample of 6-9-year-olds (N = 352; Mage = 7.57 years, SD = .70). Consistent with the largest prior structural study of the DSRS, a two-factor structure, with factors reflecting elevated negative affect (NA) and low positive affect (PA), showed strong model fit. Although this structure was consistent across sex and age (i.e., configural invariance), loadings of DSRS items varied across sex and age (i.e., metric noninvariance). Allowing the loadings of items contributing to noninvariance to vary across groups improved model fit. Implications for the clinical and research utility of the DSRS and suggestions for future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

由于儿童时期的抑郁症状与早发性抑郁症、复发、自杀和其他精神病理学风险的增加有关,因此能够做出有效解释的测量工具对于评估早期出现的抑郁症状至关重要。儿童抑郁自评量表(DSRS)是一种广泛使用的评估青少年抑郁症状的自我报告量表。对 DSRS 的潜在结构进行调查的研究相对较少,得出的结果也不尽相同,而基于性别和年龄的测量不变性(MI)还没有进行过研究。我们在一个 6-9 岁的社区样本(样本数 = 352;年龄 = 7.57 岁,SD = .70)中研究了 DSRS 在不同性别和年龄下的因子结构和 MI。与之前对 DSRS 进行的最大规模的结构研究一致,双因素结构显示出很强的模型拟合度,其中的因素反映了消极情绪(NA)的升高和积极情绪(PA)的降低。虽然这一结构在性别和年龄上是一致的(即构型不变性),但 DSRS 项目的载荷在性别和年龄上是不同的(即度量非方差性)。允许造成非方差的项目的负荷量在不同组别间变化,可以提高模型的拟合度。本文讨论了 DSRS 在临床和研究中的应用以及对未来研究的建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Latent structure and measurement invariance of the Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children across sex and age.","authors":"Haley E Green, Lindsay N Gabel, Emma K Stewart, Yuliya Kotelnikova, Elizabeth P Hayden","doi":"10.1037/pas0001327","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement tools from which valid interpretations can be made are critical for assessing early emerging depressive symptoms, as depressive symptoms in childhood are associated with increased risk for early-onset depressive disorder, recurrence, suicidality, and other psychopathology. The Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children (DSRS) is a widely used self-report scale assessing youth depressive symptoms. The relatively few studies investigating the DSRS' latent structure have yielded mixed results, and measurement invariance (MI) based on sex and age has not been examined. We examined the factor structure and MI of the DSRS across sex and age in a community sample of 6-9-year-olds (<i>N</i> = 352; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 7.57 years, <i>SD</i> = .70). Consistent with the largest prior structural study of the DSRS, a two-factor structure, with factors reflecting elevated negative affect (NA) and low positive affect (PA), showed strong model fit. Although this structure was consistent across sex and age (i.e., configural invariance), loadings of DSRS items varied across sex and age (i.e., metric noninvariance). Allowing the loadings of items contributing to noninvariance to vary across groups improved model fit. Implications for the clinical and research utility of the DSRS and suggestions for future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"552-561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying analogue samples of individuals with clinically significant social anxiety: Updating and combining cutoff scores on the Social Phobia Inventory and Sheehan Disability Scale. 确定具有临床意义的社交焦虑症患者的模拟样本:更新和合并社交恐惧症量表和希恩残疾量表的临界分数。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001328
Sophie M Kudryk, Jolie T K Ho, Joshua R C Budge, David A Moscovitch

The use of analogue samples, as opposed to clinical groups, is common in mental health research, including research on social anxiety disorder (SAD). Recent observational and statistical evidence has raised doubts about the validity of current methods for establishing analogue samples of individuals with clinically significant social anxiety. Here, we used data from large community samples of clinical and nonclinical participants to determine new cutoff scores on self-report measures of social anxiety symptoms and symptom-related impairment. We then examined whether using these newly determined cutoff scores alone or in combination improves the identification of individuals who have SAD from those who do not, revealing the most ideal cutoff combination to be 34 or above on the Social Phobia Inventory and 11 or above on the Sheehan Disability Scale. Finally, we compared the effects of our new cutoff scores with old cutoff scores by extracting analogue samples of participants with high social anxiety from historical data on seven large groups of undergraduate Psychology research participants from the authors' institution spanning the past 5 years (2018-2023). We observed that the new combined cutoff scores identified markedly fewer students as having high social anxiety, lending credibility to their utility. We also observed a striking increase in levels of social anxiety symptoms in the undergraduate population from before to after the COVID-19 pandemic. Of note, most participants were under 30 and identified as Caucasian or Asian women, indicating that future research is needed to examine whether our findings generalize to diverse populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在心理健康研究(包括社交焦虑症(SAD)研究)中,使用模拟样本而非临床群体是很常见的。最近的观察和统计证据使人们对目前建立具有临床意义的社交焦虑症患者模拟样本的方法的有效性产生了怀疑。在此,我们利用来自大型社区临床和非临床参与者样本的数据,确定了社交焦虑症状自我报告测量和症状相关损害的新临界值。然后,我们研究了单独使用或结合使用这些新确定的临界值是否能更好地识别出患有社交焦虑症的人和未患有社交焦虑症的人,结果发现最理想的临界值组合是社交恐惧症量表上的 34 分或以上和希恩残疾量表上的 11 分或以上。最后,我们通过从作者所在机构过去 5 年(2018-2023 年)的 7 个大型心理学本科生研究参与者群体的历史数据中提取高度社交焦虑参与者的模拟样本,比较了新的临界值与旧的临界值的效果。我们观察到,新的综合临界值能识别出高度社交焦虑的学生明显减少,这使其效用更加可信。我们还观察到,从 COVID-19 大流行之前到之后,本科生群体中的社交焦虑症状水平显著增加。值得注意的是,大多数参与者的年龄都在 30 岁以下,并被认定为白种人或亚裔女性,这表明未来的研究还需要考察我们的发现是否适用于不同的人群。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Identifying analogue samples of individuals with clinically significant social anxiety: Updating and combining cutoff scores on the Social Phobia Inventory and Sheehan Disability Scale.","authors":"Sophie M Kudryk, Jolie T K Ho, Joshua R C Budge, David A Moscovitch","doi":"10.1037/pas0001328","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of analogue samples, as opposed to clinical groups, is common in mental health research, including research on social anxiety disorder (SAD). Recent observational and statistical evidence has raised doubts about the validity of current methods for establishing analogue samples of individuals with clinically significant social anxiety. Here, we used data from large community samples of clinical and nonclinical participants to determine new cutoff scores on self-report measures of social anxiety symptoms and symptom-related impairment. We then examined whether using these newly determined cutoff scores alone or in combination improves the identification of individuals who have SAD from those who do not, revealing the most ideal cutoff combination to be 34 or above on the Social Phobia Inventory and 11 or above on the Sheehan Disability Scale. Finally, we compared the effects of our new cutoff scores with old cutoff scores by extracting analogue samples of participants with high social anxiety from historical data on seven large groups of undergraduate Psychology research participants from the authors' institution spanning the past 5 years (2018-2023). We observed that the new combined cutoff scores identified markedly fewer students as having high social anxiety, lending credibility to their utility. We also observed a striking increase in levels of social anxiety symptoms in the undergraduate population from before to after the COVID-19 pandemic. Of note, most participants were under 30 and identified as Caucasian or Asian women, indicating that future research is needed to examine whether our findings generalize to diverse populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"513-525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1