首页 > 最新文献

Psychological Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Normative data for the Spanish versions of the CVLT, WMS-Logical Memory, and RBMT from a sample of middle-aged and old participants. 中老年参与者的CVLT、wms -逻辑记忆和RBMT的西班牙语版本的规范性数据。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001292
María Campos-Magdaleno, Ana Nieto-Vieites, Belén Frades-Payo, Mercedes Montenegro-Peña, David Facal, Cristina Lojo-Seoane, María Luísa Delgado-Losada

Episodic memory (EM), one of the most commonly assessed cognitive domains in aging, is useful for identifying pathological processes such as mild cognitive impairment and dementia. However, EM tests must be culturally adapted, and the influence of sociodemographic variables analyzed, to provide cut-off points that enable correct diagnosis. The aim of this article is to report updated Spanish normative data for three EM tests: the California Verbal Learning Test, the Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Test, and the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Measures include immediate, short-, and long-delay free recall, intrusions, and global scores. The entire sample is comprised of 1,193 cognitively unimpaired participants aged +50, recruited from three cohort studies within the Spanish Consortium for Ageing Normative Data. Participants who subsequently developed cognitive impairment, detected at follow-up, were removed from the total sample. Data analysis included transformation of percentile ranges into scalar scores, tests for the effects of education level, age, and sex on performance, and linear regression to calculate scalar adjustments. Tables with percentile ranges and scalar scores for each measure are provided, with adjustments for age, education level, and sex, as required. The normative scores provide robust data for assessing EM in Spanish middle-aged and old populations. Effects of sex, age, and education level in each measure are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

情景记忆(EM)是衰老过程中最常评估的认知领域之一,可用于识别轻度认知障碍和痴呆等病理过程。然而,EM测试必须适应文化,并分析社会人口变量的影响,以提供能够正确诊断的分界点。本文的目的是报告三个EM测试的最新西班牙语标准数据:加利福尼亚语言学习测试,韦氏记忆测试的逻辑记忆子测试和里弗米德行为记忆测试。测量方法包括即时、短时间和长时间的无延迟回忆、入侵和全局得分。整个样本由1193名50岁以上的认知功能正常的参与者组成,他们来自西班牙老龄化规范数据联盟的三个队列研究。随后在随访中发现认知障碍的参与者被从总样本中剔除。数据分析包括将百分位范围转换为标量分数,测试教育水平、年龄和性别对成绩的影响,并使用线性回归计算标量调整。提供了每项测量的百分位数范围和标量分数表,并根据需要对年龄、教育水平和性别进行了调整。标准分数为评估西班牙中老年人群的EM提供了可靠的数据。讨论了性别、年龄和教育水平对每项测量的影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Normative data for the Spanish versions of the CVLT, WMS-Logical Memory, and RBMT from a sample of middle-aged and old participants.","authors":"María Campos-Magdaleno, Ana Nieto-Vieites, Belén Frades-Payo, Mercedes Montenegro-Peña, David Facal, Cristina Lojo-Seoane, María Luísa Delgado-Losada","doi":"10.1037/pas0001292","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Episodic memory (EM), one of the most commonly assessed cognitive domains in aging, is useful for identifying pathological processes such as mild cognitive impairment and dementia. However, EM tests must be culturally adapted, and the influence of sociodemographic variables analyzed, to provide cut-off points that enable correct diagnosis. The aim of this article is to report updated Spanish normative data for three EM tests: the California Verbal Learning Test, the Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Test, and the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Measures include immediate, short-, and long-delay free recall, intrusions, and global scores. The entire sample is comprised of 1,193 cognitively unimpaired participants aged +50, recruited from three cohort studies within the Spanish Consortium for Ageing Normative Data. Participants who subsequently developed cognitive impairment, detected at follow-up, were removed from the total sample. Data analysis included transformation of percentile ranges into scalar scores, tests for the effects of education level, age, and sex on performance, and linear regression to calculate scalar adjustments. Tables with percentile ranges and scalar scores for each measure are provided, with adjustments for age, education level, and sex, as required. The normative scores provide robust data for assessing EM in Spanish middle-aged and old populations. Effects of sex, age, and education level in each measure are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138499230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of a measure of hypervigilance and anxiety about gastrointestinal symptoms for individuals with elevated eating pathology. 对饮食病理升高的个体的胃肠道症状的高度警惕和焦虑措施的验证
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001280
K Jean Forney, Helen Burton Murray, Tiffany A Brown, Livia Guadagnoli, Gabriella Pucci, Tiffany Taft

Gastrointestinal symptoms are common within eating disorders and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety is a posited maintenance factor. The present study sought to validate a modified version of an existing measure of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance in a sample with elevated eating pathology. Esophageal-specific terms in the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale were modified to measure any gastrointestinal symptoms as a general measure of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance. Three hundred eighty-two undergraduate students (83.5% female, 87.4% White) with elevated eating pathology completed a questionnaire battery that also measured gastrointestinal symptoms, general anxiety sensitivity, and lower gastrointestinal-specific anxiety on two occasions. Analyses were preregistered at Open Science Framework. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution (anxiety and hypervigilance) fit the data best. Internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability were good for subscale scores. Subscale scores exhibited large associations with a measure of lower gastrointestinal-specific anxiety but did not exhibit the hypothesized relationships with general anxiety sensitivity. Subscale scores were at least moderately correlated with measures of gastrointestinal symptoms and somatic symptom severity, with some exceptions (hypervigilance with nausea/vomiting, postprandial fullness/early satiety, bloating). Subscale scores exhibited negligible associations with discriminant validity measures. Results suggest that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance are separable in samples with elevated eating pathology. The Anxiety and Hypervigilance subscale scores showed good reliability in a sample with elevated eating pathology. Correlations with measures of gastrointestinal symptoms and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety generally demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. We recommend researchers use subscale scores, rather than total score, in future research on gastrointestinal symptoms associated with eating pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

胃肠道症状在饮食失调中很常见,胃肠道特异性焦虑是一个假定的维持因素。目前的研究试图在一个饮食病理升高的样本中验证一种改良版的胃肠道特异性焦虑和过度警惕的现有测量方法。食管高警觉性和焦虑量表中的食管特异性术语进行了修改,以测量任何胃肠道症状,作为胃肠道特异性焦虑和高警觉性的一般测量。382名饮食病理升高的本科生(83.5%为女性,87.4%为白人)完成了一组问卷调查,该调查还测量了两次胃肠道症状、一般焦虑敏感性和较低的胃肠道特异性焦虑。分析在开放科学框架中预先注册。验证性因素分析表明,双因素解决方案(焦虑和高度警惕)最符合数据。子量表得分的内部一致性和2周重测信度良好。子量表得分与较低的胃肠道特异性焦虑表现出很大的相关性,但与一般焦虑敏感性没有表现出假设的关系。子量表得分与胃肠道症状和躯体症状严重程度的测量至少中度相关,但有一些例外(高警觉性伴恶心/呕吐、餐后饱腹感/早饱感、腹胀)。子量表得分与判别效度测量的关联可以忽略不计。结果表明,在进食病理升高的样本中,胃肠道特异性焦虑和超警觉性是可分离的。焦虑和高度警惕亚量表得分在饮食病理升高的样本中显示出良好的可靠性。与胃肠道症状和胃肠道特异性焦虑测量的相关性通常显示出良好的收敛效度和判别效度。我们建议研究人员在未来研究与饮食病理相关的胃肠道症状时使用亚量表评分,而不是总分。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Validation of a measure of hypervigilance and anxiety about gastrointestinal symptoms for individuals with elevated eating pathology.","authors":"K Jean Forney, Helen Burton Murray, Tiffany A Brown, Livia Guadagnoli, Gabriella Pucci, Tiffany Taft","doi":"10.1037/pas0001280","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal symptoms are common within eating disorders and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety is a posited maintenance factor. The present study sought to validate a modified version of an existing measure of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance in a sample with elevated eating pathology. Esophageal-specific terms in the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale were modified to measure any gastrointestinal symptoms as a general measure of gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance. Three hundred eighty-two undergraduate students (83.5% female, 87.4% White) with elevated eating pathology completed a questionnaire battery that also measured gastrointestinal symptoms, general anxiety sensitivity, and lower gastrointestinal-specific anxiety on two occasions. Analyses were preregistered at Open Science Framework. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution (anxiety and hypervigilance) fit the data best. Internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability were good for subscale scores. Subscale scores exhibited large associations with a measure of lower gastrointestinal-specific anxiety but did not exhibit the hypothesized relationships with general anxiety sensitivity. Subscale scores were at least moderately correlated with measures of gastrointestinal symptoms and somatic symptom severity, with some exceptions (hypervigilance with nausea/vomiting, postprandial fullness/early satiety, bloating). Subscale scores exhibited negligible associations with discriminant validity measures. Results suggest that gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and hypervigilance are separable in samples with elevated eating pathology. The Anxiety and Hypervigilance subscale scores showed good reliability in a sample with elevated eating pathology. Correlations with measures of gastrointestinal symptoms and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety generally demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. We recommend researchers use subscale scores, rather than total score, in future research on gastrointestinal symptoms associated with eating pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"41-52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138499232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peer victimization among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal validation study. 中国青少年同伴受害情况的纵向验证研究。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001289
Xiang Li, Ting Kin Ng, Ting Hin Lee, Cheuk Ni Li

Peer victimization is a social problem for children and adolescents worldwide. This study examined the factor structure of peer victimization in relation to school life among Chinese adolescent students. The Multidimensional Peer-Victimization Scale (MPVS) was used to measure this phenomenon. We examined psychometric properties such as factor structure, factorial invariance across genders, area types (urban vs. rural), and time (Time 1 vs. Time 2), nomological network validity in relation to the symptoms of depression and anxiety, and internal consistency reliability of the MPVS in Chinese culture. We analyzed the results of a survey of 2,764 adolescents from six public secondary schools in Fujian Province, China; 50.8% of these participants were female, and their mean age was 13.967 years (SD = .843). Of these participants, 2,217 (51.2% female), with a mean age of 13.839 years (SD = .802), also completed the survey at Time 2. Four-factor models were tested: a null model, a one-factor model, the hypothesized four-factor model, and a hierarchical model. The results revealed that the four-factor model exhibited the best fit and demonstrated factorial invariance across genders, area types, and time points. Future directions for research among Chinese adolescents were also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

同伴受害是全世界儿童和青少年的一个社会问题。本研究考察了中国青少年学生同伴伤害的因素结构与学校生活的关系。多维同伴受害量表(MPVS)被用来测量这一现象。我们检验了心理测量特性,如因子结构、跨性别的因子不变性、区域类型(城市与农村)和时间(时间1与时间2)、与抑郁和焦虑症状相关的法理网络有效性,以及中国文化中MPVS的内部一致性可靠性。我们分析了福建省6所公立中学2764名青少年的调查结果;这些参与者中50.8%为女性,平均年龄为13.967岁(SD=0.843)。在这些参与者中,2217人(51.2%为女性),平均年龄13.839岁(SD=1.802)也在时间2完成了调查。测试了四个因素模型:零因素模型、单因素模型、假设的四因素模型和层次模型。结果表明,四因素模型表现出最佳拟合,并表现出跨性别、区域类型和时间点的析因不变性。还讨论了中国青少年研究的未来方向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Peer victimization among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal validation study.","authors":"Xiang Li, Ting Kin Ng, Ting Hin Lee, Cheuk Ni Li","doi":"10.1037/pas0001289","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001289","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer victimization is a social problem for children and adolescents worldwide. This study examined the factor structure of peer victimization in relation to school life among Chinese adolescent students. The Multidimensional Peer-Victimization Scale (MPVS) was used to measure this phenomenon. We examined psychometric properties such as factor structure, factorial invariance across genders, area types (urban vs. rural), and time (Time 1 vs. Time 2), nomological network validity in relation to the symptoms of depression and anxiety, and internal consistency reliability of the MPVS in Chinese culture. We analyzed the results of a survey of 2,764 adolescents from six public secondary schools in Fujian Province, China; 50.8% of these participants were female, and their mean age was 13.967 years (<i>SD</i> = .843). Of these participants, 2,217 (51.2% female), with a mean age of 13.839 years (<i>SD</i> = .802), also completed the survey at Time 2. Four-factor models were tested: a null model, a one-factor model, the hypothesized four-factor model, and a hierarchical model. The results revealed that the four-factor model exhibited the best fit and demonstrated factorial invariance across genders, area types, and time points. Future directions for research among Chinese adolescents were also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71426345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of psychopathy among justice-involved adult males with low versus average intelligence: Differential links to violent offending. 司法人员对智力较低与一般的成年男性精神病的评估:与暴力犯罪的不同联系。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001286
Esther Kim, Chenle Xu, Craig S Neumann

Psychopathic personality is a multidimensional construct (De Brito et al., 2021) and the dimensions have differential associations with general and violent offending. Impairment in cognitive functioning, particularly intelligence (IQ), is another construct linked to both general and violent offending. However, the evidence is mixed on whether the combination of elevated psychopathy and low IQ increases the risk for violent offending (Hampton et al., 2014; Heilbrun, 1982; Walsh et al., 2004). Also, before this interaction can be firmly established, assessment of whether psychopathic traits are equivalent among individuals with different levels of IQ, especially those in the justice system, is needed. Using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA), this study of justice-involved adult males tested whether Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) item parameters were invariant among those with low (< 85) versus average IQ (≥ 85). In addition, moderated nonlinear factor analysis was conducted using continuous IQ scores to test for its effect on a range of model parameters. Both approaches provided evidence of measurement invariance. Adding criminal offenses to the MG-CFA revealed differential associations of the psychopathy dimensions with violent offending. Finally, analysis of variance results suggested an interaction between psychopathy status and IQ level-that is, those meeting diagnostic criterion for psychopathy with low IQ had the highest number of violent offenses. This study provides evidence of measurement invariance for the PCL-R among justice-involved persons with varying levels IQ and helps to extend research on the dynamic associations between psychopathy, IQ, and violent behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

精神病人格是一个多维结构(De Brito et al.,2021),这些维度与一般犯罪和暴力犯罪有不同的关联。认知功能受损,尤其是智力(IQ)受损,是另一个与一般犯罪和暴力犯罪有关的结构。然而,关于精神病和低智商的结合是否会增加暴力犯罪的风险,证据喜忧参半(Hampton等人,2014;Heilbrun,1982年;Walsh等人,2004年)。此外,在这种互动能够牢固建立之前,需要评估不同智商水平的人,尤其是司法系统中的人,心理变态特征是否相等。使用多组验证性因素分析(MG-CFA),这项涉及司法的成年男性研究测试了精神病检查表修订版(PCL-R;Hare,2003)项目参数在智商低(<85)和平均智商(≥85)的人群中是否不变。此外,使用连续IQ分数进行了适度非线性因素分析,以测试其对一系列模型参数的影响。这两种方法都提供了测量不变性的证据。将刑事犯罪添加到MG-CFA中,揭示了精神变态维度与暴力犯罪的不同关联。最后,方差分析结果表明,精神病状态和智商水平之间存在交互作用,即符合低智商精神病诊断标准的人暴力犯罪次数最多。这项研究为不同智商水平的司法参与者的PCL-R的测量不变性提供了证据,并有助于扩展对精神病、智商和暴力行为之间动态关联的研究。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Assessment of psychopathy among justice-involved adult males with low versus average intelligence: Differential links to violent offending.","authors":"Esther Kim, Chenle Xu, Craig S Neumann","doi":"10.1037/pas0001286","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychopathic personality is a multidimensional construct (De Brito et al., 2021) and the dimensions have differential associations with general and violent offending. Impairment in cognitive functioning, particularly intelligence (IQ), is another construct linked to both general and violent offending. However, the evidence is mixed on whether the combination of elevated psychopathy and low IQ increases the risk for violent offending (Hampton et al., 2014; Heilbrun, 1982; Walsh et al., 2004). Also, before this interaction can be firmly established, assessment of whether psychopathic traits are equivalent among individuals with different levels of IQ, especially those in the justice system, is needed. Using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA), this study of justice-involved adult males tested whether Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) item parameters were invariant among those with low (< 85) versus average IQ (≥ 85). In addition, moderated nonlinear factor analysis was conducted using continuous IQ scores to test for its effect on a range of model parameters. Both approaches provided evidence of measurement invariance. Adding criminal offenses to the MG-CFA revealed differential associations of the psychopathy dimensions with violent offending. Finally, analysis of variance results suggested an interaction between psychopathy status and IQ level-that is, those meeting diagnostic criterion for psychopathy with low IQ had the highest number of violent offenses. This study provides evidence of measurement invariance for the PCL-R among justice-involved persons with varying levels IQ and helps to extend research on the dynamic associations between psychopathy, IQ, and violent behavior. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41238092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a new measure of encounters with health care barriers: The Commonly Experienced Health Care Barriers Index. 开发一种新的衡量遇到医疗保健障碍的方法:常见医疗保健障碍指数。
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001284
Alannah Shelby Rivers, Keith Sanford, Morgan Brewington, Ashley Buchanan

Common barriers to health care, such as lack of insurance or transportation, hold a key theoretical role in many models attempting to explain problems with health care utilization (not seeking needed health care). However, the assessment of barriers is often post hoc, with no existing scales appropriate for a general population. This study developed and tested a new measure of commonly experienced health care barriers across three studies (Study 1, N = 194; Study 2, N = 206; Study 3, N = 741). Items were developed in line with recommendations for causal indicator models, emphasizing content validity. The measure showed preliminary test-retest reliability, sensitivity to health care inequities between Black and White individuals (beyond socioeconomic status and including association with health care discrimination), expected associations with health care utilization problems and other health experiences and life stressors, and unique associations with health care utilization problems accounting for health experiences and life stressors. The new measure has the potential to identify modifiable factors related to health care inequities and common problems with health care utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

医疗保健的常见障碍,如缺乏保险或交通,在许多试图解释医疗保健利用问题(不寻求所需的医疗保健)的模型中发挥着关键的理论作用。然而,对障碍的评估往往是事后的,没有适合普通人群的现有量表。这项研究开发并测试了三项研究中常见的医疗保健障碍的新测量方法(研究1,N=194;研究2,N=206;研究3,N=741)。项目是根据因果指标模型的建议制定的,强调内容的有效性。该指标显示了初步的重新测试可靠性、对黑人和白人之间医疗保健不平等的敏感性(超出社会经济地位,包括与医疗保健歧视的关联)、与医疗保健利用问题和其他健康经历和生活压力源的预期关联,以及与考虑到健康经历和生活压力源的医疗保健利用问题的独特关联。这项新措施有可能确定与医疗保健不公平和医疗保健利用常见问题有关的可改变因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Development of a new measure of encounters with health care barriers: The Commonly Experienced Health Care Barriers Index.","authors":"Alannah Shelby Rivers, Keith Sanford, Morgan Brewington, Ashley Buchanan","doi":"10.1037/pas0001284","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Common barriers to health care, such as lack of insurance or transportation, hold a key theoretical role in many models attempting to explain problems with health care utilization (not seeking needed health care). However, the assessment of barriers is often post hoc, with no existing scales appropriate for a general population. This study developed and tested a new measure of commonly experienced health care barriers across three studies (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 194; Study 2, <i>N</i> = 206; Study 3, <i>N</i> = 741). Items were developed in line with recommendations for causal indicator models, emphasizing content validity. The measure showed preliminary test-retest reliability, sensitivity to health care inequities between Black and White individuals (beyond socioeconomic status and including association with health care discrimination), expected associations with health care utilization problems and other health experiences and life stressors, and unique associations with health care utilization problems accounting for health experiences and life stressors. The new measure has the potential to identify modifiable factors related to health care inequities and common problems with health care utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"30-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41165317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intervening on high-risk responses during ecological momentary assessment of suicidal thoughts: Is there an effect on study data? 在自杀念头的生态瞬时评估中干预高危反应:对研究数据有影响吗?
IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001288
Kate H Bentley, Alexander J Millner, Adam Bear, Lia Follet, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Evan M Kleiman, Daniel D L Coppersmith, Franchesca Castro-Ramirez, Yael Millgram, Adam Haim, Suzanne A Bird, Matthew K Nock

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to study suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). There is a potential ethical obligation for researchers to intervene when receiving information about suicidal thoughts in real time. A possible concern, however, is that intervening when receiving responses that indicate high risk for suicide during EMA research may impact how participants respond to questions about suicidal thoughts and thus affect the validity and integrity of collected data. We leveraged data from a study of adults and adolescents (N = 434) recruited during a hospital visit for STBs to examine whether monitoring and intervening on high-risk responses affects subsequent participant responding. Overall, we found mixed support for the notion that intervening on high-risk responses influences participants' ratings. Although we observed some evidence of discontinuity in subsequent responses at the threshold used to trigger response-contingent interventions, it was not clear that such discontinuity was caused by the interventions; lower subsequent responses could be due to effective intervention, participant desire to not be contacted again, or regression to the mean. Importantly, the likelihood of completing surveys did not change from before to after response-contingent intervention. Adolescents were significantly more likely than adults, however, to change their initial suicidal intent ratings from above to below the high-risk threshold after viewing automated response-contingent pop-up messages. Studies explicitly designed to assess the potential impact of intervening on high-risk responses in real-time monitoring research are needed, as this will inform effective, scalable strategies for intervening during moments of high suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

生态瞬时评估(EMA)越来越多地用于研究自杀想法和行为(STB)。研究人员在实时收到有关自杀想法的信息时,有潜在的道德义务进行干预。然而,一个可能的问题是,在EMA研究期间,当收到表明自杀风险高的回复时进行干预,可能会影响参与者对自杀想法问题的反应,从而影响收集数据的有效性和完整性。我们利用一项针对STB住院期间招募的成年人和青少年(N=434)的研究数据,来检查对高风险反应的监测和干预是否会影响后续参与者的反应。总的来说,我们发现对高风险反应的干预会影响参与者的评分这一观点的支持率参差不齐。尽管我们观察到一些证据表明,在用于触发应急干预措施的阈值下,后续反应存在不连续性,但尚不清楚这种不连续性是由干预措施引起的;较低的后续反应可能是由于有效的干预,参与者希望不再联系,或者回归平均值。重要的是,完成调查的可能性从反应前到反应后的应急干预没有变化。然而,与成年人相比,青少年在观看自动响应的弹出消息后,将其最初的自杀意图评级从高于高风险阈值改为低于高风险阈值的可能性要大得多。需要进行明确设计的研究,以评估干预对实时监测研究中高风险反应的潜在影响,因为这将为在高自杀风险时刻进行干预提供有效、可扩展的策略。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Intervening on high-risk responses during ecological momentary assessment of suicidal thoughts: Is there an effect on study data?","authors":"Kate H Bentley, Alexander J Millner, Adam Bear, Lia Follet, Rebecca G Fortgang, Kelly L Zuromski, Evan M Kleiman, Daniel D L Coppersmith, Franchesca Castro-Ramirez, Yael Millgram, Adam Haim, Suzanne A Bird, Matthew K Nock","doi":"10.1037/pas0001288","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to study suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). There is a potential ethical obligation for researchers to intervene when receiving information about suicidal thoughts in real time. A possible concern, however, is that intervening when receiving responses that indicate high risk for suicide during EMA research may impact how participants respond to questions about suicidal thoughts and thus affect the validity and integrity of collected data. We leveraged data from a study of adults and adolescents (<i>N</i> = 434) recruited during a hospital visit for STBs to examine whether monitoring and intervening on high-risk responses affects subsequent participant responding. Overall, we found mixed support for the notion that intervening on high-risk responses influences participants' ratings. Although we observed some evidence of discontinuity in subsequent responses at the threshold used to trigger response-contingent interventions, it was not clear that such discontinuity was caused by the interventions; lower subsequent responses could be due to effective intervention, participant desire to not be contacted again, or regression to the mean. Importantly, the likelihood of completing surveys did not change from before to after response-contingent intervention. Adolescents were significantly more likely than adults, however, to change their initial suicidal intent ratings from above to below the high-risk threshold after viewing automated response-contingent pop-up messages. Studies explicitly designed to assess the potential impact of intervening on high-risk responses in real-time monitoring research are needed, as this will inform effective, scalable strategies for intervening during moments of high suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"66-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71426344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-national measurement invariance and convergent validity evidence. 冠状病毒焦虑量表:跨国测量不变性和收敛效度证据。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001270
Veljko Jovanović, Maksim Rudnev, Mohamed Abdelrahman, Nor Ba'yah Abdul Kadir, Damilola Fisayo Adebayo, Plamen Akaliyski, Rana Alaseel, Yousuf Abdulqader Alkamali, Luz Marina Alonso Palacio, Azzam Amin, Andrii Andres, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Hrant M Avanesyan, Norzihan Ayub, Maria Bacikova-Sleskova, Raushan Baikanova, Batoul Bakkar, Sunčica Bartoluci, David Benitez, Ivanna Bodnar, Aidos Bolatov, Judyta Borchet, Ksenija Bosnar, Yunier Broche-Pérez, Carmen Buzea, Rosalinda Cassibba, Maria Del Pilar Grazioso, Sandesh Dhakal, Radosveta Dimitrova, Alejandra Dominguez, Cong Doanh Duong, Luciana Dutra Thome, Arune Joao Estavela, Emmanuel Abiodun Fayankinnu, Nelli Ferenczi, Regina Fernández-Morales, Maria-Therese Friehs, Jorge Gaete, Wassim Gharz Edine, Shahar Gindi, Rubia Carla Formighieri Giordani, Biljana Gjoneska, Juan Carlos Godoy, Camellia Doncheva Hancheva, Given Hapunda, Shogo Hihara, Md Saiful Islam, Anna Janovská, Nino Javakhishvili, Russell Sarwar Kabir, Amir Kabunga, Arzu Karakulak, Johannes Alfons Karl, Darko Katović, Zhumaly Kauyzbay, Maria Kaźmierczak, Richa Khanna, Meetu Khosla, Peter Kisaakye, Martina Klicperova-Baker, Richman Kokera, Ana Kozina, Steven E Krauss, Rodrigo Landabur, Katharina Lefringhausen, Aleksandra Lewandowska-Walter, Yun-Hsia Liang, Danny Lizarzaburu-Aguinaga, Lorena Cecilia López Steinmetz, Ana Makashvili, Sadia Malik, Denisse Manrique-Millones, Marta Martín-Carbonell, Maria Angela Mattar Yunes, Breeda McGrath, Enkeleint A Mechili, Marinés Mejía Alvarez, Samson Mhizha, Justyna Michałek-Kwiecień, Sushanta Kumar Mishra, Mahdi Mohammadi, Fatema Mohsen, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Maria D Muradyan, Pasquale Musso, Andrej Naterer, Arash Nemat, Félix Neto, Joana Neto, Hassan Okati-Aliabad, Carlos Iván Orellana, Ligia Orellana, Joonha Park, Iuliia Pavlova, Eddy Alfonso Peralta, Petro Petrytsa, Rasa Pilkauskaite Valickiene, Et Al

Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a widely used measure that captures somatic symptoms of coronavirus-related anxiety. In a large-scale collaboration spanning 60 countries (Ntotal = 21,513), we examined the CAS's measurement invariance and assessed the convergent validity of CAS scores in relation to the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) and the satisfaction with life (SWLS-3) scales. We utilized both conventional exact invariance tests and alignment procedures, with results revealing that the single-factor model fit the data well in almost all countries. Partial scalar invariance was supported in a subset of 56 countries. To ensure the robustness of results, given the unbalanced samples, we employed resampling techniques both with and without replacement and found the results were more stable in larger samples. The alignment procedure demonstrated a high degree of measurement invariance with 9% of the parameters exhibiting noninvariance. We also conducted simulations of alignment using the parameters estimated in the current model. Findings demonstrated reliability of the means but indicated challenges in estimating the latent variances. Strong positive correlations between CAS and FCV-19S estimated with all three different approaches were found in most countries. Correlations of CAS and SWLS-3 were weak and negative but significantly differed from zero in several countries. Overall, the study provided support for the measurement invariance of the CAS and offered evidence of its convergent validity while also highlighting issues with variance estimation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

冠状病毒焦虑量表(CAS)是一种广泛使用的测量方法,用于捕捉冠状病毒相关焦虑的躯体症状。在跨越60个国家(Ntotal = 21,513)的大规模合作中,我们检验了CAS的测量不变性,并评估了CAS评分与COVID-19恐惧(FCV-19S)和生活满意度(SWLS-3)量表相关的收敛效度。我们利用传统的精确不变性检验和校准程序,结果表明,单因素模型拟合数据在几乎所有国家都很好。56个国家的子集支持部分标量不变性。为了确保结果的稳健性,考虑到不平衡的样本,我们采用了有和没有替换的重采样技术,发现结果在更大的样本中更稳定。校准过程显示出高度的测量不变性,9%的参数显示出非不变性。我们还使用当前模型中估计的参数进行了对准模拟。研究结果证明了均值的可靠性,但表明在估计潜在方差方面存在挑战。在大多数国家,用所有三种不同的方法估计的CAS和FCV-19S之间存在很强的正相关。CAS与SWLS-3的相关性较弱,呈负相关,但在一些国家存在显著差异。总体而言,本研究为CAS的测量不变性提供了支持,并为其收敛效度提供了证据,同时也突出了方差估计的问题。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-national measurement invariance and convergent validity evidence.","authors":"Veljko Jovanović, Maksim Rudnev, Mohamed Abdelrahman, Nor Ba'yah Abdul Kadir, Damilola Fisayo Adebayo, Plamen Akaliyski, Rana Alaseel, Yousuf Abdulqader Alkamali, Luz Marina Alonso Palacio, Azzam Amin, Andrii Andres, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Hrant M Avanesyan, Norzihan Ayub, Maria Bacikova-Sleskova, Raushan Baikanova, Batoul Bakkar, Sunčica Bartoluci, David Benitez, Ivanna Bodnar, Aidos Bolatov, Judyta Borchet, Ksenija Bosnar, Yunier Broche-Pérez, Carmen Buzea, Rosalinda Cassibba, Maria Del Pilar Grazioso, Sandesh Dhakal, Radosveta Dimitrova, Alejandra Dominguez, Cong Doanh Duong, Luciana Dutra Thome, Arune Joao Estavela, Emmanuel Abiodun Fayankinnu, Nelli Ferenczi, Regina Fernández-Morales, Maria-Therese Friehs, Jorge Gaete, Wassim Gharz Edine, Shahar Gindi, Rubia Carla Formighieri Giordani, Biljana Gjoneska, Juan Carlos Godoy, Camellia Doncheva Hancheva, Given Hapunda, Shogo Hihara, Md Saiful Islam, Anna Janovská, Nino Javakhishvili, Russell Sarwar Kabir, Amir Kabunga, Arzu Karakulak, Johannes Alfons Karl, Darko Katović, Zhumaly Kauyzbay, Maria Kaźmierczak, Richa Khanna, Meetu Khosla, Peter Kisaakye, Martina Klicperova-Baker, Richman Kokera, Ana Kozina, Steven E Krauss, Rodrigo Landabur, Katharina Lefringhausen, Aleksandra Lewandowska-Walter, Yun-Hsia Liang, Danny Lizarzaburu-Aguinaga, Lorena Cecilia López Steinmetz, Ana Makashvili, Sadia Malik, Denisse Manrique-Millones, Marta Martín-Carbonell, Maria Angela Mattar Yunes, Breeda McGrath, Enkeleint A Mechili, Marinés Mejía Alvarez, Samson Mhizha, Justyna Michałek-Kwiecień, Sushanta Kumar Mishra, Mahdi Mohammadi, Fatema Mohsen, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Maria D Muradyan, Pasquale Musso, Andrej Naterer, Arash Nemat, Félix Neto, Joana Neto, Hassan Okati-Aliabad, Carlos Iván Orellana, Ligia Orellana, Joonha Park, Iuliia Pavlova, Eddy Alfonso Peralta, Petro Petrytsa, Rasa Pilkauskaite Valickiene, Et Al","doi":"10.1037/pas0001270","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a widely used measure that captures somatic symptoms of coronavirus-related anxiety. In a large-scale collaboration spanning 60 countries (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 21,513), we examined the CAS's measurement invariance and assessed the convergent validity of CAS scores in relation to the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) and the satisfaction with life (SWLS-3) scales. We utilized both conventional exact invariance tests and alignment procedures, with results revealing that the single-factor model fit the data well in almost all countries. Partial scalar invariance was supported in a subset of 56 countries. To ensure the robustness of results, given the unbalanced samples, we employed resampling techniques both with and without replacement and found the results were more stable in larger samples. The alignment procedure demonstrated a high degree of measurement invariance with 9% of the parameters exhibiting noninvariance. We also conducted simulations of alignment using the parameters estimated in the current model. Findings demonstrated reliability of the means but indicated challenges in estimating the latent variances. Strong positive correlations between CAS and FCV-19S estimated with all three different approaches were found in most countries. Correlations of CAS and SWLS-3 were weak and negative but significantly differed from zero in several countries. Overall, the study provided support for the measurement invariance of the CAS and offered evidence of its convergent validity while also highlighting issues with variance estimation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"14-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-3 in a transgender and gender diverse sample. 明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI)-3在跨性别和性别多样性样本中的探索。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001287
William T Bryant, Nicholas A Livingston, John L McNulty, Kurt T Choate, Elizabeth J Santa Ana, Yossef S Ben-Porath

Comparisons of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals' mental health functioning with that of cisgender individuals rely almost exclusively on screening measures. The limited research with TGD individuals and omnibus assessment measures has primarily used previous iterations of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories (MMPIs). This study sought to examine the psychometric functioning of the MMPI-3 with a TGD community sample (n = 97) and compare mean scores across TGD and cisgender subsamples. We expected MMPI-3 substantive scale reliability to be comparable across all samples and subsamples. Individual MMPI-3 scales were expected to demonstrate appropriate convergent and discriminant validity with relevant criterion measures in the TGD sample. Results generally supported MMPI-3 scale score reliability and validity with TGD individuals. Next, three sets of mean score comparisons were conducted across all MMPI-3 substantive scales: (a) TGD individuals not currently in mental health treatment and the MMPI-3 normative sample, (b) TGD individuals not currently in mental health treatment and TGD individuals currently in mental health treatment, and (c) TGD individuals currently in mental health treatment and an outpatient mental health sample. Fewer differences were found between TGD individuals in our sample who were not currently in mental health treatment and the MMPI-3 normative sample compared to previous work. This initial study indicates that MMPI-3 scales largely have appropriate psychometric properties when administered to a TGD sample and that the test may be helpful in identifying mental health needs of TGD individuals. Needs and directions for further research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

跨性别和性别多样性(TGD)个体与顺性别个体的心理健康功能的比较几乎完全依赖于筛查措施。对TGD个体和综合评估措施的有限研究主要使用了明尼苏达州多相人格清单(MMPI)的先前迭代。本研究试图用TGD社区样本(n=97)检查MMPI-3的心理测量功能,并比较TGD和顺性别子样本的平均得分。我们预计MMPI-3的实质性规模可靠性在所有样本和子样本中具有可比性。个体MMPI-3量表有望在TGD样本中通过相关标准测量显示出适当的收敛和判别有效性。结果普遍支持MMPI-3量表评分对TGD个体的信度和有效性。接下来,在所有MMPI-3实质性量表上进行了三组平均得分比较:(a)目前未接受心理健康治疗的TGD个体和MMPI-3标准样本,以及(c)目前正在接受心理健康治疗的TGD个体和门诊心理健康样本。与之前的工作相比,我们的样本中目前未接受心理健康治疗的TGD个体与MMPI-3标准样本之间的差异较小。这项初步研究表明,MMPI-3量表在对TGD样本进行测试时,在很大程度上具有适当的心理测量特性,该测试可能有助于确定TGD个体的心理健康需求。讨论了进一步研究的需求和方向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Exploring the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-3 in a transgender and gender diverse sample.","authors":"William T Bryant, Nicholas A Livingston, John L McNulty, Kurt T Choate, Elizabeth J Santa Ana, Yossef S Ben-Porath","doi":"10.1037/pas0001287","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparisons of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals' mental health functioning with that of cisgender individuals rely almost exclusively on screening measures. The limited research with TGD individuals and omnibus assessment measures has primarily used previous iterations of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories (MMPIs). This study sought to examine the psychometric functioning of the MMPI-3 with a TGD community sample (<i>n</i> = 97) and compare mean scores across TGD and cisgender subsamples. We expected MMPI-3 substantive scale reliability to be comparable across all samples and subsamples. Individual MMPI-3 scales were expected to demonstrate appropriate convergent and discriminant validity with relevant criterion measures in the TGD sample. Results generally supported MMPI-3 scale score reliability and validity with TGD individuals. Next, three sets of mean score comparisons were conducted across all MMPI-3 substantive scales: (a) TGD individuals not currently in mental health treatment and the MMPI-3 normative sample, (b) TGD individuals not currently in mental health treatment and TGD individuals currently in mental health treatment, and (c) TGD individuals currently in mental health treatment and an outpatient mental health sample. Fewer differences were found between TGD individuals in our sample who were not currently in mental health treatment and the MMPI-3 normative sample compared to previous work. This initial study indicates that MMPI-3 scales largely have appropriate psychometric properties when administered to a TGD sample and that the test may be helpful in identifying mental health needs of TGD individuals. Needs and directions for further research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71426342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for For Better or for Worse? Visualizing Previous Intensity Levels Improves Emotion (Dynamic) Measurement in Experience Sampling 是好是坏?将先前的强度水平可视化可改善体验采样中的情感(动态)测量
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001296.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for For Better or for Worse? Visualizing Previous Intensity Levels Improves Emotion (Dynamic) Measurement in Experience Sampling","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001296.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001296.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"1982 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138973841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Supplemental Material for Normative Data for the Spanish Versions of the CVLT, WMS-Logical Memory, and RBMT From a Sample of Middle-Aged and Old Participants 中老年参与者样本中西班牙文版 CVLT、WMS-逻辑记忆和 RBMT 的标准数据补充材料
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001292.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Normative Data for the Spanish Versions of the CVLT, WMS-Logical Memory, and RBMT From a Sample of Middle-Aged and Old Participants","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001292.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001292.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"80 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138604440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1