首页 > 最新文献

Psychological Assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Supplemental Material for An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Across Chinese and U.S. Samples DSM-5人格量表在中美样本中的跨文化等效性研究》补充材料
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001293.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Across Chinese and U.S. Samples","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001293.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001293.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138602777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reassessing rumination: Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method for Rumination (DRM-R) to assess episodes of rumination in daily life. 重新评估反刍:反刍日重建法(DRM-R)评估日常生活中反刍次数的有效性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001282
Eve A Rosenfeld, Cassondra Lyman, Curtis M Wojcik, Kathryn S Macia, John E Roberts

Rumination is a robust vulnerability to depression and potential treatment target. However, we know relatively little about rumination in daily life. This study tested the validity of a new approach for assessing daily episodes of rumination, the Day Reconstruction Method for Rumination (DRM-R). Participants (N = 127) who were either high or low in neuroticism completed baseline self-report measures (e.g., depression, trait rumination). Next, they completed the DRM-R by reconstructing the previous day into a series of "scenes," identifying discrete episodes of rumination, and responding to follow-up items about each episode. 78.6% of high neuroticism participants reported experiencing discrete periods of rumination, 80.0% reported constant ruminative thoughts in the back of their heads, and 68.6% reported ruminative thoughts of fluctuating intensity. Time spent ruminating was moderately correlated with trait measures of rumination and worry. Findings provide preliminary evidence that the DRM-R is a valid method for assessing discrete episodes of rumination in daily life. The DRM-R may reveal, ideographically, the relationship between specific thought content and features of ruminative episodes (e.g., length, frequency). Further research is needed to establish whether the DRM-R can detect changes in rumination across multiple days and how it corresponds with traditional daily diary methods and ecological momentary assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

反刍是抑郁症的一个严重弱点,也是潜在的治疗目标。然而,我们对日常生活中的沉思知之甚少。本研究测试了一种评估每日反刍次数的新方法——反刍日重建法(DRM-R)的有效性。神经质高或低的参与者(N=127)完成了基线自我报告测量(如抑郁、特质沉思)。接下来,他们通过将前一天重建为一系列“场景”,识别离散的沉思片段,并对每个片段的后续项目做出回应,完成了DRM-R。78.6%的高神经质参与者报告经历了离散的沉思期,80.0%的参与者报告后脑勺有持续的沉思想法,68.6%的参与者报告强度波动的沉思想法。反刍所花费的时间与反刍和担忧的特质测量适度相关。研究结果提供了初步证据,证明DRM-R是评估日常生活中离散反刍事件的有效方法。DRM-R可以从意识形态上揭示特定思维内容与沉思事件特征(如长度、频率)之间的关系。需要进一步的研究来确定DRM-R是否能够检测到多天内反刍的变化,以及它如何与传统的日常日记方法和生态瞬时评估相一致。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Reassessing rumination: Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method for Rumination (DRM-R) to assess episodes of rumination in daily life.","authors":"Eve A Rosenfeld, Cassondra Lyman, Curtis M Wojcik, Kathryn S Macia, John E Roberts","doi":"10.1037/pas0001282","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination is a robust vulnerability to depression and potential treatment target. However, we know relatively little about rumination in daily life. This study tested the validity of a new approach for assessing daily episodes of rumination, the Day Reconstruction Method for Rumination (DRM-R). Participants (<i>N</i> = 127) who were either high or low in neuroticism completed baseline self-report measures (e.g., depression, trait rumination). Next, they completed the DRM-R by reconstructing the previous day into a series of \"scenes,\" identifying discrete episodes of rumination, and responding to follow-up items about each episode. 78.6% of high neuroticism participants reported experiencing discrete periods of rumination, 80.0% reported constant ruminative thoughts in the back of their heads, and 68.6% reported ruminative thoughts of fluctuating intensity. Time spent ruminating was moderately correlated with trait measures of rumination and worry. Findings provide preliminary evidence that the DRM-R is a valid method for assessing discrete episodes of rumination in daily life. The DRM-R may reveal, ideographically, the relationship between specific thought content and features of ruminative episodes (e.g., length, frequency). Further research is needed to establish whether the DRM-R can detect changes in rumination across multiple days and how it corresponds with traditional daily diary methods and ecological momentary assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1098-1107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41140685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is it time to revise the SDQ? The psychometric evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. 是时候修改SDQ了吗?优势和困难问卷的心理测量评估。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001265
Reeta Kankaanpää, Pertti Töttö, Raija-Leena Punamäki, Kirsi Peltonen

Despite the wide use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to assess adolescent mental health, its psychometric functionality is still under debate. This study investigated the structural validity and reliability of the SDQ scores, and the resemblance of the SDQ sum scores and factor scores. Factor one-dimensionality and competing multifactor structures were tested against data. With the best acceptable models, measurement invariance was tested between genders and over time. Subscale reliability and correspondence between subscale sum scores and factor scores were estimated. The nationally representative self-report data from 23,980 Finnish early (12-13 years) and mid- (15-16 years) adolescents (50.4% girls) were collected from two cohorts in 2008 and 2013. The results showed that among early adolescents, the revised SDQ with a controlled method effect had an excellent fit. In contrast, none of the tested models had an acceptable fit among the mid-adolescents. Among early adolescents, strong measurement invariance was achieved between genders and over time. Three of the five subscales were one-dimensional, and all subscales had low reliability. The resemblance between the subscale sum scores and factor scores was alarmingly low. Researchers should be cautious when using the SDQ Total Difficulties sum score or the subscale scores as they may be substantially biased, and practitioners should desist from using the SDQ as a screening tool in its current form. This study strongly supports the revision of the SDQ. In line with the previous findings, we suggest rewording the worst functioning items and revising the reverse-worded difficulties items. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管优势和困难问卷(SDQ)被广泛用于评估青少年心理健康,但其心理测量功能仍存在争议。本研究调查了SDQ得分的结构有效性和可靠性,以及SDQ总分和因子得分的相似性。根据数据对因子一维和竞争性多因子结构进行了测试。使用可接受的最佳模型,测试了性别之间和随时间变化的测量不变性。评估了分量表信度以及分量表总分和因子分之间的对应关系。2008年和2013年,从两个队列中收集了23980名芬兰早期(12-13岁)和中期(15-16岁)青少年(50.4%为女孩)的具有全国代表性的自我报告数据。结果表明,在早期青少年中,具有控制方法效果的修订SDQ具有良好的拟合性。相比之下,没有一个测试模型在青少年中期具有可接受的适合性。在早期青少年中,随着时间的推移,性别之间具有很强的测量不变性。五个分量表中有三个是一维的,所有分量表的可靠性都很低。分量表总分和因子分之间的相似性低得惊人。研究人员在使用SDQ总分或分量表得分时应谨慎,因为它们可能存在实质性偏见,从业者应停止使用当前形式的SDQ作为筛查工具。这项研究强烈支持修订SDQ。根据之前的研究结果,我们建议重新编写功能最差的项目,并修改措辞相反的困难项目。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Is it time to revise the SDQ? The psychometric evaluation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.","authors":"Reeta Kankaanpää, Pertti Töttö, Raija-Leena Punamäki, Kirsi Peltonen","doi":"10.1037/pas0001265","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the wide use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to assess adolescent mental health, its psychometric functionality is still under debate. This study investigated the structural validity and reliability of the SDQ scores, and the resemblance of the SDQ sum scores and factor scores. Factor one-dimensionality and competing multifactor structures were tested against data. With the best acceptable models, measurement invariance was tested between genders and over time. Subscale reliability and correspondence between subscale sum scores and factor scores were estimated. The nationally representative self-report data from 23,980 Finnish early (12-13 years) and mid- (15-16 years) adolescents (50.4% girls) were collected from two cohorts in 2008 and 2013. The results showed that among early adolescents, the revised SDQ with a controlled method effect had an excellent fit. In contrast, none of the tested models had an acceptable fit among the mid-adolescents. Among early adolescents, strong measurement invariance was achieved between genders and over time. Three of the five subscales were one-dimensional, and all subscales had low reliability. The resemblance between the subscale sum scores and factor scores was alarmingly low. Researchers should be cautious when using the SDQ Total Difficulties sum score or the subscale scores as they may be substantially biased, and practitioners should desist from using the SDQ as a screening tool in its current form. This study strongly supports the revision of the SDQ. In line with the previous findings, we suggest rewording the worst functioning items and revising the reverse-worded difficulties items. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1069-1084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41146170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Criminal thinking as a bipolar dimensional construct: Testing the risk-promotive status of the PICTS proactive and reactive criminal thinking scales. 犯罪思维作为一个双极维度结构:测试PICTS主动和被动犯罪思维量表的风险促进状态。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001277
Glenn D Walters

This study sought to assess whether two scales from a criminal thinking inventory displayed bipolar properties such that high scores on these scales reflect a risk effect and low scores a promotive effect. To test this hypothesis, the proactive criminal thinking (PCT) and reactive criminal thinking (RCT) scales from the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) were organized into three categories-top 25% of scores (high group), the middle 50% of scores (intermediate group), and bottom 25% of scores (low group)-and crossed with preincarceration (prior convictions and age at first conviction), peri-incarceration (total and aggressive institutional infractions), and postincarceration (revocation and rearrest) outcome indicators. Participants for this study were 3,039 male inmates who completed the PICTS while confined in a medium-security federal prison. Results showed that the PCT and RCT each achieved a mixed (risk and promotive) effect for four out of six outcomes. Of the four unipolar effects, PCT achieved a promotive effect but not a risk effect for the two preincarceration outcomes, whereas RCT produced a risk but not promotive effect for the two postincarceration outcomes. These results provide support for the notion that PCT and RCT are primarily bipolar dimensional constructs in which high scores are associated with negative criminal justice outcomes and low scores with positive criminal justice outcomes, although there may be unipolar aspects to each scale as well. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究试图评估犯罪思维量表的两个量表是否显示出双相特征,即在这些量表上得分高反映风险效应,得分低反映促进效应。为了验证这一假设,我们将犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)中的主动性犯罪思维(PCT)和反应性犯罪思维(RCT)量表分为三类——得分最高的25%(高组)、得分中间的50%(中间组)和得分最低的25%(低组)——并与监禁前(前科和首次定罪年龄)、监禁期间(全面和侵略性的机构违规)、监禁前(监禁前)和监禁前(监禁前)相交叉。以及监禁后(撤销和再逮捕)的结果指标。这项研究的参与者是3039名男性囚犯,他们在中等安全级别的联邦监狱完成了PICTS。结果显示,PCT和RCT在6个结果中的4个结果中都达到了混合(风险和促进)效果。在四种单极效应中,PCT对监禁前的两种结果产生了促进效应,但没有风险效应,而RCT对监禁后的两种结果产生了风险效应,但没有促进效应。这些结果为PCT和RCT主要是双极性维度结构的概念提供了支持,其中高分与消极的刑事司法结果相关,低分与积极的刑事司法结果相关,尽管每个量表也可能有单极方面。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Criminal thinking as a bipolar dimensional construct: Testing the risk-promotive status of the PICTS proactive and reactive criminal thinking scales.","authors":"Glenn D Walters","doi":"10.1037/pas0001277","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001277","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to assess whether two scales from a criminal thinking inventory displayed bipolar properties such that high scores on these scales reflect a risk effect and low scores a promotive effect. To test this hypothesis, the proactive criminal thinking (PCT) and reactive criminal thinking (RCT) scales from the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) were organized into three categories-top 25% of scores (high group), the middle 50% of scores (intermediate group), and bottom 25% of scores (low group)-and crossed with preincarceration (prior convictions and age at first conviction), peri-incarceration (total and aggressive institutional infractions), and postincarceration (revocation and rearrest) outcome indicators. Participants for this study were 3,039 male inmates who completed the PICTS while confined in a medium-security federal prison. Results showed that the PCT and RCT each achieved a mixed (risk and promotive) effect for four out of six outcomes. Of the four unipolar effects, PCT achieved a promotive effect but not a risk effect for the two preincarceration outcomes, whereas RCT produced a risk but not promotive effect for the two postincarceration outcomes. These results provide support for the notion that PCT and RCT are primarily bipolar dimensional constructs in which high scores are associated with negative criminal justice outcomes and low scores with positive criminal justice outcomes, although there may be unipolar aspects to each scale as well. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1152-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10232582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical utility of diagnosing limited prosocial emotions in young children using the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions (CAPE). 使用亲社会情绪临床评估(CAPE)诊断幼儿有限亲社会情绪的临床实用性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001279
Bryan Neo, Georgette E Fleming, Silvana Kaouar, Mei E Chan, Nikki N Huang, David J Hawes, Valsamma Eapen, Nancy Briggs, Eva R Kimonis

This study evaluated the interrater reliability, convergent and divergent validity, incremental validity, and clinical prognostic utility of the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions (CAPE; Frick, 2013) for assessing limited prosocial emotions (LPE). Participants were 232 young children (Mage = 3.94 years, SD = 1.46, range = 2-8; 74.6% boys) clinic-referred for conduct problems. We scored the CAPE using binary and dimensional scoring approaches and measured outcomes using parent-report and child laboratory measures. CAPE LPE symptom ratings had good interrater reliability. Children diagnosed with pretreatment LPE had more severe externalizing problems and lower empathy than children without LPE but did not differ in emotion recognition accuracy or anxiety. Dimensional CAPE symptom sum scores were associated with criterion variable scores in expected ways and offered incremental validity beyond scores on the parent-report Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits for predicting conduct problem severity, aggression, empathy deficits, and global emotion recognition accuracy. Among children who completed parent management training (n = 44), those diagnosed with LPE ended treatment with more severe aggressive behavior than those without LPE. Overall, children diagnosed with CAPE LPE have severe externalizing problems and achieve reduced benefits from standard parent management training, supporting the need for tailored and intensive interventions to maximize treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究评估了亲社会情绪临床评估(CAPE;Frick,2013)评估有限亲社会情绪(LPE)的评估者间可靠性、收敛和发散有效性、增量有效性和临床预后效用。参与者是232名因行为问题被诊所转诊的幼儿(Mage=3.94岁,SD=1.46,范围=2-8;74.6%为男孩)。我们使用二元和维度评分方法对CAPE进行评分,并使用家长报告和儿童实验室测量结果。CAPE LPE症状评分具有良好的患者间可靠性。与未接受LPE治疗的儿童相比,接受LPE预处理的儿童有更严重的外化问题和更低的同理心,但在情绪识别准确性或焦虑方面没有差异。维度CAPE症状总分以预期的方式与标准变量得分相关,并在预测行为问题严重程度、攻击性、移情缺陷和全球情绪识别准确性方面提供了超过家长报告《Callous Unmotional Characters Inventory》得分的增加有效性。在完成父母管理培训的儿童中(n=44),被诊断为LPE的儿童在结束治疗时表现出比没有LPE的更严重的攻击性行为。总的来说,被诊断为CAPE LPE的儿童有严重的外化问题,并且从标准的父母管理培训中获得的益处减少,这支持了对量身定制的强化干预措施的需求,以最大限度地提高治疗效果。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Clinical utility of diagnosing limited prosocial emotions in young children using the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions (CAPE).","authors":"Bryan Neo, Georgette E Fleming, Silvana Kaouar, Mei E Chan, Nikki N Huang, David J Hawes, Valsamma Eapen, Nancy Briggs, Eva R Kimonis","doi":"10.1037/pas0001279","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the interrater reliability, convergent and divergent validity, incremental validity, and clinical prognostic utility of the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions (CAPE; Frick, 2013) for assessing limited prosocial emotions (LPE). Participants were 232 young children (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 3.94 years, <i>SD</i> = 1.46, range = 2-8; 74.6% boys) clinic-referred for conduct problems. We scored the CAPE using binary and dimensional scoring approaches and measured outcomes using parent-report and child laboratory measures. CAPE LPE symptom ratings had good interrater reliability. Children diagnosed with pretreatment LPE had more severe externalizing problems and lower empathy than children without LPE but did not differ in emotion recognition accuracy or anxiety. Dimensional CAPE symptom sum scores were associated with criterion variable scores in expected ways and offered incremental validity beyond scores on the parent-report Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits for predicting conduct problem severity, aggression, empathy deficits, and global emotion recognition accuracy. Among children who completed parent management training (<i>n</i> = 44), those diagnosed with LPE ended treatment with more severe aggressive behavior than those without LPE. Overall, children diagnosed with CAPE LPE have severe externalizing problems and achieve reduced benefits from standard parent management training, supporting the need for tailored and intensive interventions to maximize treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1085-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41145814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of the Brief Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI) among Chinese male sailors on 18-hr rotating shift schedule. 匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(B-PSQI)简明版在中国男水手18小时轮班制中的心理测量特性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001278
Zhihao Tu, Jingwen He, Qin Zhai, Houyu Zhao, Ziying Wang, Chuan Wang, Jianquan Tian, Xinghua Shen

Sleep problems among shift workers have emerged as a public health concern in recent years. However, few validation studies of self-reported sleep quality questionnaires were performed among shift workers. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Brief Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI) in a shift workers sample. In total, 443 Chinese male sailors were recruited, of whom 46.95% (n = 208) were watchstanding sailors on 18-hr working schedule at sea. All participants completed the B-PSQI, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Self-Rating Depression Scale, and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale before and after a 30-day saling. Forty watchstanding sailors were selected to wear wrist actigraphy throughout the sailing. The results showed that the B-PSQI had acceptable internal consistency reliability in different sailor groups. Confirmatory factor analysis showed optimal fit of the single-factor model of the B-PSQI in different sailor groups. Furthermore, scalar invariance between watchstanding and day-working sailors was supported, as well as longitudinal scalar invariance across time. In addition, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the B-PSQI yields high discrimination power to detect poor sleep quality using ISI ≥ 8 criterion. However, a lack of intermethod agreement across the B-PSQI and actigraphy was found in this study. Moreover, the total scores of B-PSQI were positively related to depression and anxiety symptoms in the present sample. The B-PSQI is a reliable and valid sleep quality measure and a useful screening tool for sleep disorders among Chinese male sailors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

近年来,轮班工人的睡眠问题已成为一个公共卫生问题。然而,很少对轮班工人进行自我报告的睡眠质量问卷的验证研究。本研究旨在检验轮班工人样本中匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(B-PSQI)的心理测量特性。总共招募了443名中国男性水手,其中46.95%(n=208)是海上值班水手,工作时间为18小时。所有参与者在30天的销售前后完成了B-PSQI、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)、抑郁自评量表和焦虑自评量量表。40名值班水手被选中在整个航行过程中佩戴手腕活动记录仪。结果表明,B-PSQI在不同水手群体中具有可接受的内部一致性可靠性。验证性因素分析表明,B-PSQI单因素模型在不同水手群体中的拟合效果最佳。此外,支持值班水手和日间工作水手之间的标量不变性,以及跨时间的纵向标量不变性。此外,接收机工作特性分析表明,B-PSQI在使用ISI≥8标准检测不良睡眠质量时具有较高的识别能力。然而,在本研究中发现,B-PSQI和活动描记术之间缺乏方法间的一致性。此外,B-PSQI总分与本样本中的抑郁和焦虑症状呈正相关。B-PSQI是一种可靠有效的睡眠质量测量方法,也是筛查中国男船员睡眠障碍的有用工具。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Brief Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI) among Chinese male sailors on 18-hr rotating shift schedule.","authors":"Zhihao Tu, Jingwen He, Qin Zhai, Houyu Zhao, Ziying Wang, Chuan Wang, Jianquan Tian, Xinghua Shen","doi":"10.1037/pas0001278","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep problems among shift workers have emerged as a public health concern in recent years. However, few validation studies of self-reported sleep quality questionnaires were performed among shift workers. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Brief Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI) in a shift workers sample. In total, 443 Chinese male sailors were recruited, of whom 46.95% (<i>n</i> = 208) were watchstanding sailors on 18-hr working schedule at sea. All participants completed the B-PSQI, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Self-Rating Depression Scale, and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale before and after a 30-day saling. Forty watchstanding sailors were selected to wear wrist actigraphy throughout the sailing. The results showed that the B-PSQI had acceptable internal consistency reliability in different sailor groups. Confirmatory factor analysis showed optimal fit of the single-factor model of the B-PSQI in different sailor groups. Furthermore, scalar invariance between watchstanding and day-working sailors was supported, as well as longitudinal scalar invariance across time. In addition, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the B-PSQI yields high discrimination power to detect poor sleep quality using ISI ≥ 8 criterion. However, a lack of intermethod agreement across the B-PSQI and actigraphy was found in this study. Moreover, the total scores of B-PSQI were positively related to depression and anxiety symptoms in the present sample. The B-PSQI is a reliable and valid sleep quality measure and a useful screening tool for sleep disorders among Chinese male sailors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1108-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41161579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
I can't handle my desires: Development and validation of a self-report measure of desire intolerance and associations with distress intolerance. 我不能控制我的欲望:欲望不耐受的自我报告测量方法的发展和验证,以及与痛苦不耐受的联系。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001275
Jennifer C Veilleux, Danielle E Higuera, Elise A Warner, Regina E Schreiber, Katherine Hyde Brott, Jeremy B Clift

Desire intolerance is conceptualized as a motivational counterpoint to the transdiagnostic risk factor of distress intolerance and is defined as the inability or unwillingness to "sit with" the motivation to approach a rewarding object or task. The current work describes the development and validation of a novel measure of desire intolerance. After initial item development and exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2), the 10-item unidimensional Desire Intolerance Questionnaire (DIQ) was created. Desire intolerance was conceptually related to low self-control (Studies 1-4) and both approach and avoidance motivation (Studies 2, 4, 5) and was distinct from delay of gratification (Study 3). Greater desire intolerance was also associated with higher distress intolerance (Studies 4 and 5). In Study 4, we used qualitative coding to explore what people were thinking about when they considered their "desires." Findings revealed that higher desire intolerance was associated with thinking about desired long-term outcomes more than proximal short-term hedonic pleasures. Finally, Study 4 focused on unique and independent associations between desire and distress intolerance with psychopathology, and we found that both distress intolerance were associated with heightened psychological distress and borderline personality symptoms. Only distress intolerance was uniquely associated with uncontrolled eating and self-criticism, whereas only desire intolerance was uniquely associated with aggressive behavior and dichotomous thinking. The current research supports the DIQ as a psychometrically sound indicator of difficulties withstanding desires and allows for a better understanding of intolerance as a transdiagnostic clinical phenomena. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

欲望不耐受被定义为与痛苦不耐受的跨诊断风险因素相对应的动机,被定义为无法或不愿意“与”动机“坐”在一起,接近有回报的对象或任务。目前的工作描述了一种新的衡量欲望不容忍的发展和验证。经过初步项目开发和探索性因素分析(研究1)、验证性因素分析(研究2),编制了包含10个项目的单向度欲望不耐受问卷(DIQ)。欲望不耐受在概念上与低自我控制(研究1-4)以及接近和回避动机(研究2、4、5)相关,与延迟满足(研究3)不同。更大的欲望不耐受也与更高的痛苦不耐受相关(研究4和5)。在研究4中,我们使用定性编码来探索人们在考虑他们的“欲望”时在想什么。研究结果显示,欲望不耐受程度较高的人更倾向于考虑期望的长期结果,而不是近期的短期享乐。最后,研究4关注的是欲望和痛苦不耐受与精神病理之间独特而独立的联系,我们发现这两种痛苦不耐受都与加剧的心理痛苦和边缘型人格症状有关。只有痛苦不耐症与不受控制的饮食和自我批评有关,而只有欲望不耐症与攻击行为和二元思维有关。目前的研究支持DIQ作为一种心理测量学上的合理指标,可以更好地理解不耐受作为一种跨诊断的临床现象。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"I can't handle my desires: Development and validation of a self-report measure of desire intolerance and associations with distress intolerance.","authors":"Jennifer C Veilleux, Danielle E Higuera, Elise A Warner, Regina E Schreiber, Katherine Hyde Brott, Jeremy B Clift","doi":"10.1037/pas0001275","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Desire intolerance is conceptualized as a motivational counterpoint to the transdiagnostic risk factor of distress intolerance and is defined as the inability or unwillingness to \"sit with\" the motivation to approach a rewarding object or task. The current work describes the development and validation of a novel measure of desire intolerance. After initial item development and exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis (Study 2), the 10-item unidimensional Desire Intolerance Questionnaire (DIQ) was created. Desire intolerance was conceptually related to low self-control (Studies 1-4) and both approach and avoidance motivation (Studies 2, 4, 5) and was distinct from delay of gratification (Study 3). Greater desire intolerance was also associated with higher distress intolerance (Studies 4 and 5). In Study 4, we used qualitative coding to explore what people were thinking about when they considered their \"desires.\" Findings revealed that higher desire intolerance was associated with thinking about desired long-term outcomes more than proximal short-term hedonic pleasures. Finally, Study 4 focused on unique and independent associations between desire and distress intolerance with psychopathology, and we found that both distress intolerance were associated with heightened psychological distress and borderline personality symptoms. Only distress intolerance was uniquely associated with uncontrolled eating and self-criticism, whereas only desire intolerance was uniquely associated with aggressive behavior and dichotomous thinking. The current research supports the DIQ as a psychometrically sound indicator of difficulties withstanding desires and allows for a better understanding of intolerance as a transdiagnostic clinical phenomena. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1134-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10232583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The folk psychiatry model: Developing a measure of lay perceptions of PTSD. 民间精神病学模型:开发一种测量外行人对创伤后应激障碍认知的方法。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001274
Alexandria F Sowers, Joshua D Clapp, Scott A Freng, Kasey Stanton

Whereas existing data verify the importance of support networks in facilitating resilience following trauma, the sociocultural perceptions of posttrauma difficulties that provide context for these interactions remain largely unexplored. Folk psychiatry models propose that lay explanations of mental illness can be quantified along distinct moralizing, medicalizing, and psychologizing dimensions. The current project aimed to develop a trauma-specific measure capturing lay explanations of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on this framework. Data were collected from three samples of Mechanical Turk respondents (N₁ = 367; N₂ = 365; N₃ = 401) as well as an independent sample of university students (N₄ = 311). Factor analysis of the final, 13-item Folk Psychiatry Measure-PTSD (FPM-P) indicated close fit of a correlated three-factor model in MTurk and student respondents. Across samples, moralizing beliefs about PTSD (e.g., people with PTSD lack a moral compass) evidenced moderate-to-strong correlations with general attitudes toward those with mental illness, including positive associations with authoritarianism, social restrictiveness, blame, anger, and perceived dangerousness. Negative associations with benevolence and support for community-based care were also noted. Medicalizing beliefs (e.g., PTSD is caused by a chemical imbalance) demonstrated more modest associations with negative attitudes, as noted through weak correlations with increased authoritarianism, anger, and lower benevolence toward those experiencing psychological difficulties. Finally, psychologizing explanations (e.g., people with poor relationships and low social support are at greater risk of developing PTSD) evidenced weak but positive associations with benevolence and pity for those with mental health concerns. Implications and cultural-based nuances of the scale are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管现有数据证实了支持网络在促进创伤后恢复力方面的重要性,但为这些相互作用提供背景的创伤后困难的社会文化观念在很大程度上仍未得到探索。民间精神病学模型提出,对精神疾病的外行解释可以沿着不同的道德、医学和心理维度进行量化。目前的项目旨在基于这个框架开发一种创伤特异性的测量方法,捕捉创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的外行解释。数据收集自三个土耳其机械受访者样本(N₁= 367;N₂= 365;N₃= 401)以及一个独立的大学生样本(N₄= 311)。最终的13项民间精神病学量表- ptsd (FPM-P)的因子分析表明,MTurk和学生的相关三因素模型非常接近。在所有样本中,关于创伤后应激障碍的道德信念(例如,创伤后应激障碍患者缺乏道德指南针)与对精神疾病患者的一般态度有中等到强烈的相关性,包括与威权主义、社会限制、责备、愤怒和感知危险的正相关。还注意到与仁慈和支持社区护理的负面关联。医学化的信念(例如,创伤后应激障碍是由化学失衡引起的)与消极态度的关联更为温和,正如对那些经历心理困难的人的专制主义、愤怒和较低的仁慈的弱相关性所指出的那样。最后,心理学上的解释(例如,人际关系差和社会支持低的人患PTSD的风险更大)与对有心理健康问题的人的仁慈和怜悯之间存在微弱但积极的联系。讨论了该量表的含义和基于文化的细微差别。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The folk psychiatry model: Developing a measure of lay perceptions of PTSD.","authors":"Alexandria F Sowers, Joshua D Clapp, Scott A Freng, Kasey Stanton","doi":"10.1037/pas0001274","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas existing data verify the importance of support networks in facilitating resilience following trauma, the sociocultural perceptions of posttrauma difficulties that provide context for these interactions remain largely unexplored. Folk psychiatry models propose that lay explanations of mental illness can be quantified along distinct moralizing, medicalizing, and psychologizing dimensions. The current project aimed to develop a trauma-specific measure capturing lay explanations of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on this framework. Data were collected from three samples of Mechanical Turk respondents (<i>N</i>₁ = 367; <i>N</i>₂ = 365; <i>N</i>₃ = 401) as well as an independent sample of university students (<i>N</i>₄ = 311). Factor analysis of the final, 13-item Folk Psychiatry Measure-PTSD (FPM-P) indicated close fit of a correlated three-factor model in MTurk and student respondents. Across samples, moralizing beliefs about PTSD (e.g., people with PTSD lack a moral compass) evidenced moderate-to-strong correlations with general attitudes toward those with mental illness, including positive associations with authoritarianism, social restrictiveness, blame, anger, and perceived dangerousness. Negative associations with benevolence and support for community-based care were also noted. Medicalizing beliefs (e.g., PTSD is caused by a chemical imbalance) demonstrated more modest associations with negative attitudes, as noted through weak correlations with increased authoritarianism, anger, and lower benevolence toward those experiencing psychological difficulties. Finally, psychologizing explanations (e.g., people with poor relationships and low social support are at greater risk of developing PTSD) evidenced weak but positive associations with benevolence and pity for those with mental health concerns. Implications and cultural-based nuances of the scale are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1120-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10223927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-National Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity Evidence 冠状病毒焦虑量表补充材料:跨国测量不变性和收敛效度证据
2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001270.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-National Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity Evidence","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001270.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001270.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"9 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales Add Utility for Predicting Treatment Engagement During Partial Psychiatric Hospitalizations MMPI-2-RF效度量表的补充材料增加了预测部分精神病住院期间治疗参与的效用
2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001285.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales Add Utility for Predicting Treatment Engagement During Partial Psychiatric Hospitalizations","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001285.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001285.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136282690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological Assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1