Joanne A Rathbone,Tegan Cruwys,Jolanda Jetten,Fiona Kate Barlow
The social identity approach provides an innovative theoretical framework to understand the systemic nature and determinants of weight stigma and discrimination. Integrating existing evidence, we discuss the need for social identity-informed interventions to support the health of people with higher weight and increase advocacy for equity among higher weight and advantaged groups. We outline how interventions might achieve these goals by challenging the extent to which weight-based group boundaries are perceived as permeable and the inequity experienced by people with higher weight is seen as legitimate and stable. We describe three beliefs about weight and health that present key targets for interventions, as they shape weight-based social identities and inform perceptions of the legitimacy of inequity. We provide concrete directions for future research to design and evaluate new interventions aiming to promote and protect health and equity for people with higher weight. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
社会认同方法提供了一个创新的理论框架来理解体重耻辱和歧视的系统性质和决定因素。综合现有证据，我们讨论了社会身份知情干预的必要性，以支持体重较高的人的健康，并增加倡导体重较高和有利群体的公平。我们概述了干预措施如何通过挑战基于体重的群体界限被认为是可渗透的程度以及体重较高的人所经历的不平等被视为合法和稳定的程度来实现这些目标。我们描述了关于体重和健康的三种信念，它们是干预措施的关键目标，因为它们塑造了基于体重的社会身份，并告知了对不平等合法性的看法。我们为未来的研究提供了具体的方向，以设计和评估旨在促进和保护超重人群健康和公平的新干预措施。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"Reducing weight-based rejection: Identifying facilitators and barriers to positive social change using the social identity approach.","authors":"Joanne A Rathbone,Tegan Cruwys,Jolanda Jetten,Fiona Kate Barlow","doi":"10.1037/rev0000604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000604","url":null,"abstract":"The social identity approach provides an innovative theoretical framework to understand the systemic nature and determinants of weight stigma and discrimination. Integrating existing evidence, we discuss the need for social identity-informed interventions to support the health of people with higher weight and increase advocacy for equity among higher weight and advantaged groups. We outline how interventions might achieve these goals by challenging the extent to which weight-based group boundaries are perceived as permeable and the inequity experienced by people with higher weight is seen as legitimate and stable. We describe three beliefs about weight and health that present key targets for interventions, as they shape weight-based social identities and inform perceptions of the legitimacy of inequity. We provide concrete directions for future research to design and evaluate new interventions aiming to promote and protect health and equity for people with higher weight. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Modeling Speed–Accuracy Trade-Offs in the Stopping Rule for Confidence Judgments","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/rev0000603.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000603.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145689051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article introduces the linguistic active inference theory, which proposes that inner speech augments the brain's predictive processes by transforming prior expectations and sensorimotor predictions to help reduce prediction error and uncertainty. By leveraging language's unique properties-its efficiency in representing sensorimotor information, its ability to extend across time and space, and its generativity in constructing novel predictions-inner speech enables predictive processes to transcend immediate experience, encoding complex sensory experiences into linguistic forms for perceptual inference while decoding abstract goals into situated actions for active control. Linguistic active inference theory provides a unifying framework explaining how inner speech's diverse functions, varied phenomenology, and neurocognitive developmental mechanisms all emerge from its augmentation of perceptual inference and active control. It posits that inner speech dynamically adapts its form and function in response to computational demands and ongoing prediction errors to reduce the imprecision in the brain's generative model. This synthesis advances foundational theories and provides a roadmap for future research: generating novel testable hypotheses, motivating a shift toward dynamic and integrative methodologies, and opening new perspectives on related mental phenomena and the broader role of symbolic systems in cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本文介绍了语言主动推理理论，该理论提出内在言语通过转换先验期望和感觉运动预测来增强大脑的预测过程，以帮助减少预测误差和不确定性。通过利用语言的独特属性——表达感觉运动信息的效率，跨越时间和空间的能力，以及构建新预测的生成能力——内在言语使预测过程能够超越直接经验，将复杂的感官经验编码为语言形式以进行感知推理，同时将抽象目标解码为情境行动以进行主动控制。语言主动推理理论提供了一个统一的框架，解释了内在言语的各种功能、各种现象学和神经认知发展机制是如何从知觉推理和主动控制的增强中产生的。它假设内部语言动态地适应其形式和功能，以响应计算需求和持续的预测错误，以减少大脑生成模型的不精确性。这种综合推进了基础理论，并为未来的研究提供了路线图：产生新的可测试的假设，推动向动态和综合方法的转变，并为相关心理现象和符号系统在认知中的更广泛作用开辟了新的视角。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"Rethinking inner speech through linguistic active inference.","authors":"Bo Yao","doi":"10.1037/rev0000607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000607","url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces the linguistic active inference theory, which proposes that inner speech augments the brain's predictive processes by transforming prior expectations and sensorimotor predictions to help reduce prediction error and uncertainty. By leveraging language's unique properties-its efficiency in representing sensorimotor information, its ability to extend across time and space, and its generativity in constructing novel predictions-inner speech enables predictive processes to transcend immediate experience, encoding complex sensory experiences into linguistic forms for perceptual inference while decoding abstract goals into situated actions for active control. Linguistic active inference theory provides a unifying framework explaining how inner speech's diverse functions, varied phenomenology, and neurocognitive developmental mechanisms all emerge from its augmentation of perceptual inference and active control. It posits that inner speech dynamically adapts its form and function in response to computational demands and ongoing prediction errors to reduce the imprecision in the brain's generative model. This synthesis advances foundational theories and provides a roadmap for future research: generating novel testable hypotheses, motivating a shift toward dynamic and integrative methodologies, and opening new perspectives on related mental phenomena and the broader role of symbolic systems in cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alejandro Pérez Velilla,Bret Beheim,Paul E Smaldino
We use cultural evolutionary models to examine how individual experiences and culturally inherited information jointly shape risk-taking behavior under environmental uncertainty. We find that learning processes not only generate considerable variation in risk beliefs and behaviors, but also that conservative learning strategies-emphasizing the preservation of generational knowledge-excel in high-risk settings, promoting risk avoidance and long-term survival but limiting growth when conditions improve. In contrast, exploratory learning strategies-leveraging juvenile exploration and peer influence-foster risk tolerant behaviors that thrive in affluent, low-risk settings where wealth buffers and social safety nets reduce the costs of miscalculations. Introducing economic stratification to the model reveals how wealth disparities and interclass interactions reinforce these patterns, exacerbating differences in learning strategies and risk-taking behaviors within populations, and perpetuating socioeconomic inequalities through the cultural inertia of excessive risk avoidance. By uniting developmental, social, and evolutionary perspectives, our framework provides a novel lens on the cultural evolution of risk-taking behavior and its broader societal implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们使用文化进化模型来研究个体经验和文化遗传信息如何共同塑造环境不确定性下的冒险行为。我们发现，学习过程不仅会在风险信念和行为上产生相当大的变化，而且保守的学习策略——强调世代知识的保存——在高风险环境中表现出色，促进风险规避和长期生存，但在条件改善时限制增长。相比之下，探索性学习策略——利用青少年探索和同伴影响——培养了在富裕、低风险环境中茁壮成长的风险容忍行为，在富裕、低风险环境中，财富缓冲和社会安全网减少了误判的成本。在模型中引入经济分层，揭示了财富差距和阶级间互动如何强化这些模式，加剧了人群中学习策略和冒险行为的差异，并通过过度规避风险的文化惯性使社会经济不平等永续下去。通过结合发展、社会和进化的观点，我们的框架为冒险行为的文化演变及其更广泛的社会影响提供了一个新的视角。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"The development of risk behaviors and their cultural transmission.","authors":"Alejandro Pérez Velilla,Bret Beheim,Paul E Smaldino","doi":"10.1037/rev0000599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000599","url":null,"abstract":"We use cultural evolutionary models to examine how individual experiences and culturally inherited information jointly shape risk-taking behavior under environmental uncertainty. We find that learning processes not only generate considerable variation in risk beliefs and behaviors, but also that conservative learning strategies-emphasizing the preservation of generational knowledge-excel in high-risk settings, promoting risk avoidance and long-term survival but limiting growth when conditions improve. In contrast, exploratory learning strategies-leveraging juvenile exploration and peer influence-foster risk tolerant behaviors that thrive in affluent, low-risk settings where wealth buffers and social safety nets reduce the costs of miscalculations. Introducing economic stratification to the model reveals how wealth disparities and interclass interactions reinforce these patterns, exacerbating differences in learning strategies and risk-taking behaviors within populations, and perpetuating socioeconomic inequalities through the cultural inertia of excessive risk avoidance. By uniting developmental, social, and evolutionary perspectives, our framework provides a novel lens on the cultural evolution of risk-taking behavior and its broader societal implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the most common method of eliciting false memories in the laboratory is the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995), where participants study a set of items that are all similar to a nonpresented critical lure. A common finding is that false recognition to critical lures is much higher than to other nonpresented items and in some cases is even comparable to true recognition, regardless of whether similarity is semantic or structural (e.g., phonological or orthographic) relations. While there exists a handful of computational models of this paradigm, they have only been applied to semantic but not structural false recognition, they have not been fit at the level of individual participants, and they have not been applied to response times. We present a global matching model that addresses all three of these current gaps. Global similarity of semantic and structural representations drives a pair of linear ballistic accumulators, which are used to produce decisions as well as complete response time distributions. In addition to being able to account for heightened false recognition of critical lures, the model was able to account for differences across both individual participants and items, lower correlations between semantic and structural false recognition than true recognition, differences in false recognition across levels of processing, improved true recognition but not false recognition with higher study time, and heightened false recognition under speed emphasis. The model suggests that semantic and structural false recognition can be explained using only a single retrieval mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在实验室中，引发错误记忆最常见的方法之一是迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式（迪斯，1959；罗迪格和麦克德莫特，1995），参与者研究一组与未呈现的关键诱饵相似的项目。一个常见的发现是，无论相似性是语义关系还是结构关系（如语音或正字法），对关键诱饵的错误识别比对其他未呈现的物品的错误识别要高得多，在某些情况下甚至与正确识别相当。虽然存在一些这种范式的计算模型，但它们只应用于语义错误识别，而不是结构性错误识别，它们不适合个体参与者的水平，也没有应用于响应时间。我们提出了一个全球匹配模型，解决了所有这三个当前的差距。语义和结构表示的全局相似性驱动一对线性弹道累加器，用于产生决策和完整的响应时间分布。除了能够解释关键诱饵的高错误识别之外，该模型还能够解释个体参与者和项目之间的差异，语义和结构错误识别之间的相关性低于真实识别，不同处理水平的错误识别差异，随着学习时间的增加，真实识别得到改善，但错误识别没有改善，以及在速度强调下错误识别增强。该模型表明，语义和结构错误识别可以只用一个单一的检索机制来解释。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"A global matching model of choice and response times in the Deese-Roediger-Mcdermott semantic and structural false recognition paradigms.","authors":"Adam F Osth,Lyulei Zhang,Samuel Williams","doi":"10.1037/rev0000596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000596","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most common method of eliciting false memories in the laboratory is the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995), where participants study a set of items that are all similar to a nonpresented critical lure. A common finding is that false recognition to critical lures is much higher than to other nonpresented items and in some cases is even comparable to true recognition, regardless of whether similarity is semantic or structural (e.g., phonological or orthographic) relations. While there exists a handful of computational models of this paradigm, they have only been applied to semantic but not structural false recognition, they have not been fit at the level of individual participants, and they have not been applied to response times. We present a global matching model that addresses all three of these current gaps. Global similarity of semantic and structural representations drives a pair of linear ballistic accumulators, which are used to produce decisions as well as complete response time distributions. In addition to being able to account for heightened false recognition of critical lures, the model was able to account for differences across both individual participants and items, lower correlations between semantic and structural false recognition than true recognition, differences in false recognition across levels of processing, improved true recognition but not false recognition with higher study time, and heightened false recognition under speed emphasis. The model suggests that semantic and structural false recognition can be explained using only a single retrieval mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145674164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
People often rationalize their choices, reassessing selected options as more positive after choosing them. This article proposes that this type of rationalization does not arise from the act or self-perception of choosing (as previously thought), but rather from accepting the outcome, characterized by the degree to which it feels resolved and settled. It builds on a dissonance-reduction account of rationalization, in which unfavorable features of a chosen alternative become inconsistent with the choice, and the resulting cognitive dissonance motivates the chooser to rationalize them (e.g., by downplaying the importance of those features) and form a more favorable view of the chosen alternative. We extend this idea by suggesting that a similar process can motivate this form of rationalization for outcomes that were not personally selected, provided there is acceptance of the outcome. This article introduces acceptance as a critical moderator of this type of rationalization for both choices and assignments, with higher acceptance leading to more rationalization. This conceptualization allows for the exploration of factors that influence acceptance of outcomes. Potential antecedents such as freedom to choose or reject the outcome, finality of the outcome, and consent to the outcome-determining process are discussed. Finally, this perspective broadens the scope of dissonance theory. While choice has been considered a necessary condition for dissonance effects, the results from seven experiments (N = 2,557) challenge this view, bridging dissonance and other theories of rationalization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
人们通常会为自己的选择找理由，在做出选择后重新评估选择是否更积极。这篇文章提出，这种类型的合理化不是来自于选择的行为或自我感知（如之前所认为的），而是来自于接受结果，其特征是感觉得到解决和解决的程度。它建立在合理化的失调减少账户上，其中被选择的选项的不利特征与选择不一致，由此产生的认知失调促使选择者合理化它们（例如，通过淡化这些特征的重要性），并形成对所选择的选项更有利的看法。我们通过提出类似的过程可以激发非个人选择的结果的这种形式的合理化来扩展这一想法，只要结果被接受。本文介绍了接受作为选择和任务的这种类型的合理化的关键调节因素，接受程度越高导致合理化程度越高。这种概念化允许探索影响结果接受度的因素。潜在的先决条件，如自由选择或拒绝结果，结果的终局性，并同意结果决定过程进行了讨论。最后，这一视角拓宽了失调理论的范围。虽然选择被认为是失调效应的必要条件，但七个实验（N = 2557）的结果挑战了这一观点，架起了失调和其他合理化理论的桥梁。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"Bounded rationalization: The role of acceptance in postchoice and postassignment rationalization.","authors":"Kurt P Munz,Adam Eric Greenberg,Vicki G Morwitz","doi":"10.1037/rev0000602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000602","url":null,"abstract":"People often rationalize their choices, reassessing selected options as more positive after choosing them. This article proposes that this type of rationalization does not arise from the act or self-perception of choosing (as previously thought), but rather from accepting the outcome, characterized by the degree to which it feels resolved and settled. It builds on a dissonance-reduction account of rationalization, in which unfavorable features of a chosen alternative become inconsistent with the choice, and the resulting cognitive dissonance motivates the chooser to rationalize them (e.g., by downplaying the importance of those features) and form a more favorable view of the chosen alternative. We extend this idea by suggesting that a similar process can motivate this form of rationalization for outcomes that were not personally selected, provided there is acceptance of the outcome. This article introduces acceptance as a critical moderator of this type of rationalization for both choices and assignments, with higher acceptance leading to more rationalization. This conceptualization allows for the exploration of factors that influence acceptance of outcomes. Potential antecedents such as freedom to choose or reject the outcome, finality of the outcome, and consent to the outcome-determining process are discussed. Finally, this perspective broadens the scope of dissonance theory. While choice has been considered a necessary condition for dissonance effects, the results from seven experiments (N = 2,557) challenge this view, bridging dissonance and other theories of rationalization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145674163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gilad Pessach, Konstantinos Tsetsos, Michel Regenwetter, Marius Usher
{"title":"Within-alternative processing supports transitivity of preferences in multiattribute choice.","authors":"Gilad Pessach, Konstantinos Tsetsos, Michel Regenwetter, Marius Usher","doi":"10.1037/rev0000587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000587","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Bounded Rationalization: The Role of Acceptance in Postchoice and Postassignment Rationalization","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/rev0000602.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000602.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for The Development of Risk Behaviors and Their Cultural Transmission","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/rev0000599.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000599.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for A Global Matching Model of Choice and Response Times in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott Semantic and Structural False Recognition Paradigms","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/rev0000596.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000596.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：