Benson S Ku, Qingyue Yuan, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao D Lin, Elaine F Walker, Benjamin G Druss, Jiyuan Ren, Jim van Os, Sinan Guloksuz
Background and hypothesis: Persistent distressing psychotic-like experiences (PLE) are associated with impaired functioning and future psychopathology. Prior research suggests that physical activities may be protective against psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether physical activities may interact with genetics in the development of psychosis.
Study design: This study included 4679 participants of European ancestry from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Persistent distressing PLE was derived from the Prodromal-Questionnaire-Brief Child Version using four years of data. Generalized linear mixed models tested the association between polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS-SCZ), physical activities, and PLE. The models adjusted for age, sex, parental education, income-to-needs ratio, family history of psychosis, body mass index, puberty status, principal components for PRS-SCZ, study site, and family.
Study results: PRS-SCZ was associated with a greater risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1.14, 95% CI [1.04, 1.24], P = .003). Physical activity was associated with less risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96], P = .008). Moreover, physical activities moderated the association between PRS-SCZ and persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81, 0.98], P = .015), such that the association was weaker as participants had greater participation in physical activities.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the interaction between genetic liability and physical activities is associated with trajectories of distressing PLE. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of physical activities and genetic liability for schizophrenia in the development of psychosis.
背景和假设:持续痛苦的精神病样经历(PLE)与功能受损和未来的精神病理学有关。先前的研究表明,体育活动可能对精神病理学具有保护作用。然而,目前尚不清楚体育活动是否会与遗传在精神病的发展过程中产生相互作用:本研究纳入了 4679 名来自青少年大脑认知发展研究(Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study)的欧洲血统参与者。持续困扰性 PLE 是利用四年的数据从 "前驱期-问卷-简明儿童版 "中得出的。广义线性混合模型检验了精神分裂症多基因风险评分(PRS-SCZ)、体育活动和PLE之间的关联。模型对年龄、性别、父母教育程度、收入与需求比、精神病家族史、体重指数、青春期状况、PRS-SCZ 主成分、研究地点和家庭进行了调整:PRS-SCZ与较高的持续困扰性 PLE 风险相关(调整后相对风险比 (RRR) = 1.14,95% CI [1.04, 1.24],P = .003)。体育锻炼与持续困扰性 PLE 风险较低相关(调整后相对风险比 = 0.87,95% CI [0.79,0.96],P = .008)。此外,体育活动调节了PRS-SCZ与持续困扰性PLE之间的关联(调整后RRR = 0.89,95% CI [0.81,0.98],P = .015),即参与者参与体育活动越多,关联越弱:这些研究结果表明,遗传责任和体育活动之间的相互作用与令人痛苦的 PLE 轨迹有关。要了解体育活动和精神分裂症遗传因子在精神病发展中的作用机制,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Associations Between Genetic Risk, Physical Activities, and Distressing Psychotic-like Experiences.","authors":"Benson S Ku, Qingyue Yuan, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao D Lin, Elaine F Walker, Benjamin G Druss, Jiyuan Ren, Jim van Os, Sinan Guloksuz","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae141","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Persistent distressing psychotic-like experiences (PLE) are associated with impaired functioning and future psychopathology. Prior research suggests that physical activities may be protective against psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether physical activities may interact with genetics in the development of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study included 4679 participants of European ancestry from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Persistent distressing PLE was derived from the Prodromal-Questionnaire-Brief Child Version using four years of data. Generalized linear mixed models tested the association between polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS-SCZ), physical activities, and PLE. The models adjusted for age, sex, parental education, income-to-needs ratio, family history of psychosis, body mass index, puberty status, principal components for PRS-SCZ, study site, and family.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>PRS-SCZ was associated with a greater risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1.14, 95% CI [1.04, 1.24], P = .003). Physical activity was associated with less risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96], P = .008). Moreover, physical activities moderated the association between PRS-SCZ and persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81, 0.98], P = .015), such that the association was weaker as participants had greater participation in physical activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that the interaction between genetic liability and physical activities is associated with trajectories of distressing PLE. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of physical activities and genetic liability for schizophrenia in the development of psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142018418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anthony P Morrison, Melissa Pyle, Heather Law, Richard Emsley, Graeme MacLennan, Jemma Hudson
Background: There is little head-to-head data comparing cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and antipsychotic medication (APs). However, several recent trials have been conducted in first episode psychosis. We report a pre-specified individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis utilizing data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with similar designs to examine relative effectiveness.
Study design: The outcomes were psychiatric symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: PANSS) and recovery (Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery: QPR) at 6 months. One-stage and two-stage IPD meta-analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Serious adverse events are also summarized.
Study results: Two RCTs were included in the pooled IPD analysis which provided 136 participants. For PANSS total at 6 months, the one-stage meta-analysis found no evidence of a difference between CBTp alone and APs alone (mean difference 2.58, 95% CI, -2.83 to 7.98; P-value 0.35) and CBTp alone compared with APs plus CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14 to 0.31; P-value 0.063). For APs alone compared to CBTp plus APs there was evidence of a difference (MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65 to -2.33; P-value 0.007) favoring the combined treatment. For user-defined recovery (QPR), there was a difference favoring CBTp plus APs in comparison to both CBTp alone (P-value 0.029) and APs alone (P-value 0.026), but no difference between the monotherapies (P-value 0.91). The most common serious adverse events were psychiatric hospital admissions.
Conclusions: Cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis and APs did not differ in their effects on symptoms or recovery, but there were suggestions that the combined treatment may be superior. A definitive RCT is warranted.
{"title":"Relative Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Antipsychotics and the Combination for People with First Episode Psychosis: A Two-Study Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data.","authors":"Anthony P Morrison, Melissa Pyle, Heather Law, Richard Emsley, Graeme MacLennan, Jemma Hudson","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf121","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little head-to-head data comparing cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and antipsychotic medication (APs). However, several recent trials have been conducted in first episode psychosis. We report a pre-specified individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis utilizing data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with similar designs to examine relative effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The outcomes were psychiatric symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: PANSS) and recovery (Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery: QPR) at 6 months. One-stage and two-stage IPD meta-analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Serious adverse events are also summarized.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Two RCTs were included in the pooled IPD analysis which provided 136 participants. For PANSS total at 6 months, the one-stage meta-analysis found no evidence of a difference between CBTp alone and APs alone (mean difference 2.58, 95% CI, -2.83 to 7.98; P-value 0.35) and CBTp alone compared with APs plus CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14 to 0.31; P-value 0.063). For APs alone compared to CBTp plus APs there was evidence of a difference (MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65 to -2.33; P-value 0.007) favoring the combined treatment. For user-defined recovery (QPR), there was a difference favoring CBTp plus APs in comparison to both CBTp alone (P-value 0.029) and APs alone (P-value 0.026), but no difference between the monotherapies (P-value 0.91). The most common serious adverse events were psychiatric hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis and APs did not differ in their effects on symptoms or recovery, but there were suggestions that the combined treatment may be superior. A definitive RCT is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Margaux Sageot, Inez Myin-Germeys, Robin Achterhof, Ruud van Winkel
Background and hypotheses: Sexual minority populations have a higher prevalence of psychotic experiences (PE), possibly due to differential experiences within the social envirome in its positive (eg, social support, parenting) and negative aspects (eg, adverse life events, bullying). This study hypothesized that (1) sexual minority adolescents experience more PE, (2) are more exposed to harmful aspects of the social envirome, and (3) may display differential sensitivity to certain aspects of the social envirome.
Study design: Data from 678 adolescents (mean age 15.6 years) were analyzed. Psychotic experiences were assessed using the Prodromal Questionnaire 16 (PQ-16). Aspects of the social envirome (childhood adversity, bullying, parenting style, and social support) were evaluated using different questionnaires.
Study results: The odds ratio of having sexual minority status (SMS) was 1.98 (95 CI%, 1.02-3.84) for participants with PE (PQ-16 ≥ 6) compared to participants without. Significant associations were found between SMS and more adverse childhood experiences (95% CI, 0.11-3.51) and parenting psychological control (95% CI, 0.11-0.53), and less parenting autonomy support (95% CI, -0.37 to -0.01). There were also significant differential effects: adverse childhood experiences were associated with PE in heterosexuals but not in sexual minorities (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), while less social support was associated with more PE in heterosexuals but less PE in sexual minorities (95% CI, 0.06-0.39).
Conclusions: Sexual minority status is associated with a higher prevalence of PE, greater exposure to harmful factors within the social envirome, and differential effects on sexual minority and heterosexual individuals. These results emphasize the need for a fine-grained analysis of the envirome to understand the increased risk for PE in sexual minorities.
{"title":"Examining Psychosis Risk in Sexual Minority Youth: Increased Exposure to and Differential Impact of the Social Envirome in Early Adolescence.","authors":"Margaux Sageot, Inez Myin-Germeys, Robin Achterhof, Ruud van Winkel","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae216","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>Sexual minority populations have a higher prevalence of psychotic experiences (PE), possibly due to differential experiences within the social envirome in its positive (eg, social support, parenting) and negative aspects (eg, adverse life events, bullying). This study hypothesized that (1) sexual minority adolescents experience more PE, (2) are more exposed to harmful aspects of the social envirome, and (3) may display differential sensitivity to certain aspects of the social envirome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Data from 678 adolescents (mean age 15.6 years) were analyzed. Psychotic experiences were assessed using the Prodromal Questionnaire 16 (PQ-16). Aspects of the social envirome (childhood adversity, bullying, parenting style, and social support) were evaluated using different questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>The odds ratio of having sexual minority status (SMS) was 1.98 (95 CI%, 1.02-3.84) for participants with PE (PQ-16 ≥ 6) compared to participants without. Significant associations were found between SMS and more adverse childhood experiences (95% CI, 0.11-3.51) and parenting psychological control (95% CI, 0.11-0.53), and less parenting autonomy support (95% CI, -0.37 to -0.01). There were also significant differential effects: adverse childhood experiences were associated with PE in heterosexuals but not in sexual minorities (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), while less social support was associated with more PE in heterosexuals but less PE in sexual minorities (95% CI, 0.06-0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sexual minority status is associated with a higher prevalence of PE, greater exposure to harmful factors within the social envirome, and differential effects on sexual minority and heterosexual individuals. These results emphasize the need for a fine-grained analysis of the envirome to understand the increased risk for PE in sexual minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, I-Yuan Liu, Celso Arango, Stephen R Marder
Background and hypotheses: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) carry a substantial burden, and there are no treatments currently approved for NSS. The efficacy of pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist and antagonist, in treating NSS was assessed.
Study design: ADVANCE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pimavanserin in patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pimavanserin (34 mg/day) or placebo alongside ongoing background antipsychotic medication. Eligible adults were aged 18-55 years and had access to a caregiver. The primary and key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 26 in the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) total score and Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale-Severity (CGI-SCH-S) negative symptom score, respectively.
Study results: Of the 454 randomized patients, 71 (39 placebo; 32 pimavanserin) discontinued and 383 (188 placebo; 195 pimavanserin) completed the study. The safety and full analysis sets comprised 453 and 446 patients, respectively. The NSA-16 change from baseline to week 26 was not significantly different between groups (least squares mean difference: -0.67; SE, 0.95; [95% CI: -2.54, 1.20]; P = .48; Cohen's d effect size: 0.07). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 30.4% with pimavanserin and 40.3% with placebo.
Conclusions: In this study, pimavanserin was well tolerated, and although it demonstrated a similar treatment effect as in the prior phase 2 study favoring pimavanserin, treatment with pimavanserin vs placebo did not result in significant differences for primary or other endpoints.
{"title":"A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimavanserin as an Adjunctive Treatment for the Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (ADVANCE-2) in Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms.","authors":"Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, I-Yuan Liu, Celso Arango, Stephen R Marder","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf034","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) carry a substantial burden, and there are no treatments currently approved for NSS. The efficacy of pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist and antagonist, in treating NSS was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>ADVANCE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pimavanserin in patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pimavanserin (34 mg/day) or placebo alongside ongoing background antipsychotic medication. Eligible adults were aged 18-55 years and had access to a caregiver. The primary and key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 26 in the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) total score and Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale-Severity (CGI-SCH-S) negative symptom score, respectively.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Of the 454 randomized patients, 71 (39 placebo; 32 pimavanserin) discontinued and 383 (188 placebo; 195 pimavanserin) completed the study. The safety and full analysis sets comprised 453 and 446 patients, respectively. The NSA-16 change from baseline to week 26 was not significantly different between groups (least squares mean difference: -0.67; SE, 0.95; [95% CI: -2.54, 1.20]; P = .48; Cohen's d effect size: 0.07). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 30.4% with pimavanserin and 40.3% with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, pimavanserin was well tolerated, and although it demonstrated a similar treatment effect as in the prior phase 2 study favoring pimavanserin, treatment with pimavanserin vs placebo did not result in significant differences for primary or other endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143781005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma M Parrish, Kevin Kuehn, Amy Pinkham, Raeanne C Moore, Philip D Harvey, Eric Granholm, Scott Roesch, Thomas Joiner, Varsha D Badal, Colin A Depp
Background and hypothesis: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of suicide ideation (SI) and suicide behavior (SB). Longitudinal studies on factors contributing to SI/SB in SMI are lacking. Interpersonal biases (ie, perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) are cross-sectionally related to SI/SB, but do they relate to longitudinal suicide risk or other illness factors? Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a powerful approach to a deeper understanding of these complex relationships.
Study design: Participants with SMI (N = 180) completed 3 in-lab visits (baseline, 6-month, and 12-month) and 10 days of EMA (3×/day) following the baseline visit. At all timepoints, participants were assessed for SI/SB and were classified as persistent, intermittent, or no SI or any reports of SB over the 12-month follow-up. Multinomial logistic regression models examined whether EMA burdensomeness, belongingness, social motivations, and psychotic symptoms predicted SI persistence or SB over 12 months. Time-series network analysis compared participants' EMA data by baseline SI.
Study results: Burdensomeness and belongingness related to persistent SI 12 months, as did voices, suspiciousness, and social motivations. Only burdensomeness and belongingness related to increased risk of SB over 12 months. Network analyses revealed unique lagged relationships in the baseline SI group: of suspiciousness to belongingness and social avoidance motivation to burdensomeness when compared to the baseline group without SI.
Conclusions: These findings indicate the importance of interpersonal risk factors and suspiciousness to trajectories of SI and SB over 12 months in SMI. Pending replication, these constructs may be potential suicide prevention treatment targets in SMI.
{"title":"Relationship of Perceived Burdensomeness and Thwarted Belongingness to Suicide Ideation Persistence and Suicide Behavior Over 12 Months in People With Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Emma M Parrish, Kevin Kuehn, Amy Pinkham, Raeanne C Moore, Philip D Harvey, Eric Granholm, Scott Roesch, Thomas Joiner, Varsha D Badal, Colin A Depp","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf023","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>People with serious mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of suicide ideation (SI) and suicide behavior (SB). Longitudinal studies on factors contributing to SI/SB in SMI are lacking. Interpersonal biases (ie, perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) are cross-sectionally related to SI/SB, but do they relate to longitudinal suicide risk or other illness factors? Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a powerful approach to a deeper understanding of these complex relationships.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Participants with SMI (N = 180) completed 3 in-lab visits (baseline, 6-month, and 12-month) and 10 days of EMA (3×/day) following the baseline visit. At all timepoints, participants were assessed for SI/SB and were classified as persistent, intermittent, or no SI or any reports of SB over the 12-month follow-up. Multinomial logistic regression models examined whether EMA burdensomeness, belongingness, social motivations, and psychotic symptoms predicted SI persistence or SB over 12 months. Time-series network analysis compared participants' EMA data by baseline SI.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Burdensomeness and belongingness related to persistent SI 12 months, as did voices, suspiciousness, and social motivations. Only burdensomeness and belongingness related to increased risk of SB over 12 months. Network analyses revealed unique lagged relationships in the baseline SI group: of suspiciousness to belongingness and social avoidance motivation to burdensomeness when compared to the baseline group without SI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate the importance of interpersonal risk factors and suspiciousness to trajectories of SI and SB over 12 months in SMI. Pending replication, these constructs may be potential suicide prevention treatment targets in SMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143625784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren T Catalano, Pooja K Patel, Lauren P Weittenhiller, Michael F Green
Background: The reduced interest in, pleasure from, and motivation for social connection (clinically referred to as social anhedonia) significantly contributes to social dysfunction in schizophrenia. However, social anhedonia in schizophrenia has been challenging to treat. A new wave of psychosocial interventions for anhedonia, referred to as "positive affect interventions", have been validated in depression, but have not been widely applied in schizophrenia.
Study design: The goal of this narrative review article is to introduce positive affect interventions as a novel approach to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia. We provide a narrative review of (1) the current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia; (2) the current positive affect intervention strategies for motivational deficits in depression; (3) the reward mechanisms (responsivity, learning, and valuation) that may differentially impact treatment response in schizophrenia vs depression; and (4) adaptations that might be needed to implement positive affect interventions in schizophrenia.
Study results: Compared with current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia, positive affect interventions have a greater emphasis on increasing positive affect (via reward mechanisms) to increase motivated social behavior. Adaptations of positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia might consider challenges with social goal-setting, negative social interactions, and social avoidance.
Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions that target positive affect could ultimately lead to greater improvements in social connection in schizophrenia. Recommendations for next steps to validate positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia are discussed.
{"title":"Targeting Positive Affect as a Way to Improve Social Anhedonia in Schizophrenia.","authors":"Lauren T Catalano, Pooja K Patel, Lauren P Weittenhiller, Michael F Green","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reduced interest in, pleasure from, and motivation for social connection (clinically referred to as social anhedonia) significantly contributes to social dysfunction in schizophrenia. However, social anhedonia in schizophrenia has been challenging to treat. A new wave of psychosocial interventions for anhedonia, referred to as \"positive affect interventions\", have been validated in depression, but have not been widely applied in schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The goal of this narrative review article is to introduce positive affect interventions as a novel approach to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia. We provide a narrative review of (1) the current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia; (2) the current positive affect intervention strategies for motivational deficits in depression; (3) the reward mechanisms (responsivity, learning, and valuation) that may differentially impact treatment response in schizophrenia vs depression; and (4) adaptations that might be needed to implement positive affect interventions in schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Compared with current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia, positive affect interventions have a greater emphasis on increasing positive affect (via reward mechanisms) to increase motivated social behavior. Adaptations of positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia might consider challenges with social goal-setting, negative social interactions, and social avoidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychosocial interventions that target positive affect could ultimately lead to greater improvements in social connection in schizophrenia. Recommendations for next steps to validate positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809817/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clementine J Edwards, Robin Smith, Ginette Lafit, Thomas Ward, Richard Emsley, Mar Rus-Calafell, Inez Myin-Germeys, Emmanuelle Peters, Sandra Bucci, Thomas K Craig, Gillian Haddock, Hannah Ball, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Amy Hardy, Hamish McLeod, Andrew I Gumley, Jeffrey McDonnell, Alice Montague, Moya Clancy, Mark Huckvale, Philippa Anne Garety
AVATAR therapy involves facilitated dialogs between a voice hearer and a digital embodiment of their distressing voice ("the avatar"). We conducted a multi-site single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of brief (AV-BRF) and extended (AV-EXT) forms of AVATAR therapy, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) alone (AVATAR2). This study reports the data from experience sampling method (ESM) assessments conducted at baseline, end of therapy (16 weeks), and follow-up (28 weeks). The research questions focused on whether those in the AV-BRF or AV-EXT arms experienced less voice-related distress, anxiety, and beliefs as measured by ESM, compared to TAU. Separate mixed-effects models were fitted for each research question. The final sample (n = 200) completed approximately 40% of questionnaires across all timepoints. Participants who received AV-EXT therapy, but not AV-BRF, reported reduced momentary voice-related distress at 16 (P = .022) and 28 weeks (p = .029). Appraisals of voice control were also reduced in the AV-EXT arm at 16 weeks when the voice was present (P = .002) or not (P = .008). Voice power appraisals were reduced (P < .035) in both arms when the voice was "not present but on my mind" at all timepoints. There were no changes in the frequency of voice hearing, appraisals of voice intent, or assertive responding. These findings from everyday life, reported for the first time, provide evidence of the impact on the primary AVATAR therapy treatment targets, including appraisals of voice power and control. The weight of evidence favors the AV-EXT protocol in the further development and implementation of AVATAR therapy.
{"title":"The Impact of AVATAR Therapy on Voice Hearing in Everyday Life: ESM Outcomes of the AVATAR2 Trial.","authors":"Clementine J Edwards, Robin Smith, Ginette Lafit, Thomas Ward, Richard Emsley, Mar Rus-Calafell, Inez Myin-Germeys, Emmanuelle Peters, Sandra Bucci, Thomas K Craig, Gillian Haddock, Hannah Ball, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Amy Hardy, Hamish McLeod, Andrew I Gumley, Jeffrey McDonnell, Alice Montague, Moya Clancy, Mark Huckvale, Philippa Anne Garety","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf100","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AVATAR therapy involves facilitated dialogs between a voice hearer and a digital embodiment of their distressing voice (\"the avatar\"). We conducted a multi-site single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of brief (AV-BRF) and extended (AV-EXT) forms of AVATAR therapy, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) alone (AVATAR2). This study reports the data from experience sampling method (ESM) assessments conducted at baseline, end of therapy (16 weeks), and follow-up (28 weeks). The research questions focused on whether those in the AV-BRF or AV-EXT arms experienced less voice-related distress, anxiety, and beliefs as measured by ESM, compared to TAU. Separate mixed-effects models were fitted for each research question. The final sample (n = 200) completed approximately 40% of questionnaires across all timepoints. Participants who received AV-EXT therapy, but not AV-BRF, reported reduced momentary voice-related distress at 16 (P = .022) and 28 weeks (p = .029). Appraisals of voice control were also reduced in the AV-EXT arm at 16 weeks when the voice was present (P = .002) or not (P = .008). Voice power appraisals were reduced (P < .035) in both arms when the voice was \"not present but on my mind\" at all timepoints. There were no changes in the frequency of voice hearing, appraisals of voice intent, or assertive responding. These findings from everyday life, reported for the first time, provide evidence of the impact on the primary AVATAR therapy treatment targets, including appraisals of voice power and control. The weight of evidence favors the AV-EXT protocol in the further development and implementation of AVATAR therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Helen Niemeyer, Felix Opper, Michel Sabé, Emily A Holmes, Kerem Böge
Background and hypothesis: Psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms commonly co-occur. Psychological interventions have increasingly targeted these co-occurring symptoms. However, information on their efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability is limited in this evolving field.
Study design: After preregistration at PROSPERO (CRD42024553934), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions with persons aged 16+ reporting both psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science were searched in July 2024. We used the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB-2) for bias assessment. Random-effects models were used to synthesize clinical outcomes, while meta-regression was applied when 10 effect sizes were reported per outcome.
Study results: We included 10 RCTs with 559 participants. Interventions primarily targeted trauma-related symptoms and were seemingly tolerable and acceptable, with low adverse event profiles and a dropout rate of 14%. In comparison to usual treatments and active control treatments, interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at post-treatment (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), with meta-regression favoring interventions primarily employing exposure (gdiff = 0.59, [0.22, 0.97]). Interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at follow-up (g = 0.34, [0.12, 0.56]), but not total psychotic, positive, or negative symptoms at either timeframe.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that psychological interventions for co-occurring psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms are safe, tolerable, and may reduce traumatic-stress symptoms when employing exposure. Considering the substantial risk of bias, the small number of trials, non-significant results for other clinical and functional outcomes, and unexplained heterogeneity, further research is needed.
背景与假设:精神和创伤性应激症状通常同时发生。心理干预越来越多地针对这些共同出现的症状。然而,在这个不断发展的领域,关于它们的功效、耐受性和可接受性的信息是有限的。研究设计:在普洛斯普洛斯(CRD42024553934)预注册后,我们对16岁以上报告精神病和创伤应激症状的人进行了心理干预的随机对照试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析。2024年7月检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Clinicaltrials.gov和Web of Science。我们使用改进的Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具(rob2)进行偏倚评估。随机效应模型用于综合临床结果,而当每个结果报告10个效应大小时,应用元回归。研究结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共559名受试者。干预措施主要针对创伤相关症状,似乎是可容忍和可接受的,不良事件发生率低,辍学率为14%。与常规治疗和积极对照治疗相比,干预措施显著降低了治疗后的创伤应激症状(g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), meta回归倾向于主要采用暴露的干预措施(gdiff = 0.59,[0.22, 0.97])。干预措施在随访中显著降低了创伤应激症状(g = 0.34,[0.12, 0.56]),但在任何一个时间框架内都没有减少总精神病性、阳性或阴性症状。结论:研究结果表明,对精神病和创伤应激症状同时发生的心理干预是安全的、可容忍的,并且在使用暴露时可能减轻创伤应激症状。考虑到较大的偏倚风险、试验数量少、其他临床和功能结局的结果不显著以及无法解释的异质性,需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Psychological Interventions for Persons With Co-occurring Psychotic and Traumatic-Stress Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Helen Niemeyer, Felix Opper, Michel Sabé, Emily A Holmes, Kerem Böge","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf185","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms commonly co-occur. Psychological interventions have increasingly targeted these co-occurring symptoms. However, information on their efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability is limited in this evolving field.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>After preregistration at PROSPERO (CRD42024553934), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions with persons aged 16+ reporting both psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science were searched in July 2024. We used the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB-2) for bias assessment. Random-effects models were used to synthesize clinical outcomes, while meta-regression was applied when 10 effect sizes were reported per outcome.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 559 participants. Interventions primarily targeted trauma-related symptoms and were seemingly tolerable and acceptable, with low adverse event profiles and a dropout rate of 14%. In comparison to usual treatments and active control treatments, interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at post-treatment (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), with meta-regression favoring interventions primarily employing exposure (gdiff = 0.59, [0.22, 0.97]). Interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at follow-up (g = 0.34, [0.12, 0.56]), but not total psychotic, positive, or negative symptoms at either timeframe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that psychological interventions for co-occurring psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms are safe, tolerable, and may reduce traumatic-stress symptoms when employing exposure. Considering the substantial risk of bias, the small number of trials, non-significant results for other clinical and functional outcomes, and unexplained heterogeneity, further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Inge Hahne, Marco Zierhut, Niklas Bergmann, Eric Hahn, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Claudia Calvano, Malek Bajbouj, Kerem Böge
Background and hypothesis: The efficacy of yoga as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) has garnered interest. While yoga may positively influence various symptom domains, further investigation is needed due to the limited number, quality, and generalizability of studies. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability (primary outcome) of a yoga-based group intervention (YoGI) developed in a participatory approach and explored its preliminary effectiveness.
Study design: In addition to the primary outcomes, this preregistered randomized controlled trial examined rater-blinded general psychopathology, positive- and negative symptoms, and self-rated depression, anxiety, stress, body mindfulness, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognition, social functioning, quality of life, and medication regime at baseline and postintervention as secondary outcomes.
Study results: Fifty inpatients with SSD received either TAU (n = 25) or YoGI + TAU (n = 25) for four weeks. Outcomes showed 95% protocol adherence of YoGI, feasibility, and retention rates of 91% and 94%, respectively, and a dropout rate of 6%. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group postintervention improvements for YoGI + TAU in positive symptoms, depression, cognitive fusion, and a mindfulness subscale. Medium-to-large pre- to postintervention effects were found for body mindfulness, positive, negative, and general psychopathology, cognitive fusion, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and attention in YoGI + TAU, while within-group changes were consistently smaller in TAU. No severe adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: This trial supports the feasibility and acceptability of YoGI for inpatients with SSD and provides preliminary evidence of YoGI's benefits beyond TAU. Further robust, multicentric RCTs are warranted to deepen our understanding of YoGI's therapeutic potential and inform clinical interventions for SSD.
{"title":"Yoga-Based Group Intervention for Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders-Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of a Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Inge Hahne, Marco Zierhut, Niklas Bergmann, Eric Hahn, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Claudia Calvano, Malek Bajbouj, Kerem Böge","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae198","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The efficacy of yoga as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) has garnered interest. While yoga may positively influence various symptom domains, further investigation is needed due to the limited number, quality, and generalizability of studies. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability (primary outcome) of a yoga-based group intervention (YoGI) developed in a participatory approach and explored its preliminary effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In addition to the primary outcomes, this preregistered randomized controlled trial examined rater-blinded general psychopathology, positive- and negative symptoms, and self-rated depression, anxiety, stress, body mindfulness, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognition, social functioning, quality of life, and medication regime at baseline and postintervention as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Fifty inpatients with SSD received either TAU (n = 25) or YoGI + TAU (n = 25) for four weeks. Outcomes showed 95% protocol adherence of YoGI, feasibility, and retention rates of 91% and 94%, respectively, and a dropout rate of 6%. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group postintervention improvements for YoGI + TAU in positive symptoms, depression, cognitive fusion, and a mindfulness subscale. Medium-to-large pre- to postintervention effects were found for body mindfulness, positive, negative, and general psychopathology, cognitive fusion, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and attention in YoGI + TAU, while within-group changes were consistently smaller in TAU. No severe adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial supports the feasibility and acceptability of YoGI for inpatients with SSD and provides preliminary evidence of YoGI's benefits beyond TAU. Further robust, multicentric RCTs are warranted to deepen our understanding of YoGI's therapeutic potential and inform clinical interventions for SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucy Jenner, Mollie Payne, Felicity Waite, Helen Beckwith, Rowan Diamond, Louise Isham, Nicola Collett, Richard Emsley, Daniel Freeman
Background: A theory-driven cognitive therapy (Feeling Safe) has produced much better outcomes for patients with persecutory delusions. There are four distinct response classes: very high delusion conviction with large improvement, very high delusion conviction with no response, high delusion conviction with large improvement, and high delusion conviction with modest improvement. Our objective was to apply principal trajectories analysis, a novel statistical method, to original trial data to estimate whether these groups may have responded differently to a different intervention: befriending.
Design: One hundred and thirty patients with persistent persecutory delusions were randomised to six months of Feeling Safe or befriending. Baseline assessments were used to assign patients allocated to befriending (who did not receive Feeling Safe) into the four Feeling Safe response classes. The treatment effect, including on potential mediators, was then estimated for these classes.
Results: Patients in two treatment response classes (Very high conviction/large improvement, High conviction/large improvement) benefited more from Feeling Safe, patients in one group (Very high conviction/no improvement) benefited more from befriending, and patients in the remaining group (High conviction/moderate improvement) benefited equally from the interventions. Mechanism differences were detected when Feeling Safe was superior to befriending, but not when befriending was superior.
Conclusions: There may be patients with psychosis who benefit more from one type of therapy than another, likely due to different change mechanisms. The application of principal trajectories has generated testable hypotheses and a potential step toward personalised treatment. We recommend an investigation of whether sequential provision of the treatment types could enhance patient outcomes. Keywords: persecutory, delusions, outcome trajectories, psychosis, cognitive therapy.
{"title":"Learning How to Improve the Treatment of Persecutory Delusions: Using a Principal Trajectories Analysis to Examine Differential Effects of Two Psychological Interventions (Feeling Safe, Befriending) in Distinct Groups of Patients.","authors":"Lucy Jenner, Mollie Payne, Felicity Waite, Helen Beckwith, Rowan Diamond, Louise Isham, Nicola Collett, Richard Emsley, Daniel Freeman","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf083","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A theory-driven cognitive therapy (Feeling Safe) has produced much better outcomes for patients with persecutory delusions. There are four distinct response classes: very high delusion conviction with large improvement, very high delusion conviction with no response, high delusion conviction with large improvement, and high delusion conviction with modest improvement. Our objective was to apply principal trajectories analysis, a novel statistical method, to original trial data to estimate whether these groups may have responded differently to a different intervention: befriending.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients with persistent persecutory delusions were randomised to six months of Feeling Safe or befriending. Baseline assessments were used to assign patients allocated to befriending (who did not receive Feeling Safe) into the four Feeling Safe response classes. The treatment effect, including on potential mediators, was then estimated for these classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in two treatment response classes (Very high conviction/large improvement, High conviction/large improvement) benefited more from Feeling Safe, patients in one group (Very high conviction/no improvement) benefited more from befriending, and patients in the remaining group (High conviction/moderate improvement) benefited equally from the interventions. Mechanism differences were detected when Feeling Safe was superior to befriending, but not when befriending was superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There may be patients with psychosis who benefit more from one type of therapy than another, likely due to different change mechanisms. The application of principal trajectories has generated testable hypotheses and a potential step toward personalised treatment. We recommend an investigation of whether sequential provision of the treatment types could enhance patient outcomes. Keywords: persecutory, delusions, outcome trajectories, psychosis, cognitive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144508057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}