首页 > 最新文献

Schizophrenia Bulletin最新文献

英文 中文
Associations Between Genetic Risk, Physical Activities, and Distressing Psychotic-like Experiences. 遗传风险、体育活动与令人不安的精神病样经历之间的关系。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae141
Benson S Ku, Qingyue Yuan, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao D Lin, Elaine F Walker, Benjamin G Druss, Jiyuan Ren, Jim van Os, Sinan Guloksuz

Background and hypothesis: Persistent distressing psychotic-like experiences (PLE) are associated with impaired functioning and future psychopathology. Prior research suggests that physical activities may be protective against psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether physical activities may interact with genetics in the development of psychosis.

Study design: This study included 4679 participants of European ancestry from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Persistent distressing PLE was derived from the Prodromal-Questionnaire-Brief Child Version using four years of data. Generalized linear mixed models tested the association between polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS-SCZ), physical activities, and PLE. The models adjusted for age, sex, parental education, income-to-needs ratio, family history of psychosis, body mass index, puberty status, principal components for PRS-SCZ, study site, and family.

Study results: PRS-SCZ was associated with a greater risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1.14, 95% CI [1.04, 1.24], P = .003). Physical activity was associated with less risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96], P = .008). Moreover, physical activities moderated the association between PRS-SCZ and persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81, 0.98], P = .015), such that the association was weaker as participants had greater participation in physical activities.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the interaction between genetic liability and physical activities is associated with trajectories of distressing PLE. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of physical activities and genetic liability for schizophrenia in the development of psychosis.

背景和假设:持续痛苦的精神病样经历(PLE)与功能受损和未来的精神病理学有关。先前的研究表明,体育活动可能对精神病理学具有保护作用。然而,目前尚不清楚体育活动是否会与遗传在精神病的发展过程中产生相互作用:本研究纳入了 4679 名来自青少年大脑认知发展研究(Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study)的欧洲血统参与者。持续困扰性 PLE 是利用四年的数据从 "前驱期-问卷-简明儿童版 "中得出的。广义线性混合模型检验了精神分裂症多基因风险评分(PRS-SCZ)、体育活动和PLE之间的关联。模型对年龄、性别、父母教育程度、收入与需求比、精神病家族史、体重指数、青春期状况、PRS-SCZ 主成分、研究地点和家庭进行了调整:PRS-SCZ与较高的持续困扰性 PLE 风险相关(调整后相对风险比 (RRR) = 1.14,95% CI [1.04, 1.24],P = .003)。体育锻炼与持续困扰性 PLE 风险较低相关(调整后相对风险比 = 0.87,95% CI [0.79,0.96],P = .008)。此外,体育活动调节了PRS-SCZ与持续困扰性PLE之间的关联(调整后RRR = 0.89,95% CI [0.81,0.98],P = .015),即参与者参与体育活动越多,关联越弱:这些研究结果表明,遗传责任和体育活动之间的相互作用与令人痛苦的 PLE 轨迹有关。要了解体育活动和精神分裂症遗传因子在精神病发展中的作用机制,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Associations Between Genetic Risk, Physical Activities, and Distressing Psychotic-like Experiences.","authors":"Benson S Ku, Qingyue Yuan, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao D Lin, Elaine F Walker, Benjamin G Druss, Jiyuan Ren, Jim van Os, Sinan Guloksuz","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae141","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Persistent distressing psychotic-like experiences (PLE) are associated with impaired functioning and future psychopathology. Prior research suggests that physical activities may be protective against psychopathology. However, it is unclear whether physical activities may interact with genetics in the development of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study included 4679 participants of European ancestry from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Persistent distressing PLE was derived from the Prodromal-Questionnaire-Brief Child Version using four years of data. Generalized linear mixed models tested the association between polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS-SCZ), physical activities, and PLE. The models adjusted for age, sex, parental education, income-to-needs ratio, family history of psychosis, body mass index, puberty status, principal components for PRS-SCZ, study site, and family.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>PRS-SCZ was associated with a greater risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted relative risk ratio (RRR) = 1.14, 95% CI [1.04, 1.24], P = .003). Physical activity was associated with less risk for persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96], P = .008). Moreover, physical activities moderated the association between PRS-SCZ and persistent distressing PLE (adjusted RRR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81, 0.98], P = .015), such that the association was weaker as participants had greater participation in physical activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that the interaction between genetic liability and physical activities is associated with trajectories of distressing PLE. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of physical activities and genetic liability for schizophrenia in the development of psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142018418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relative Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Antipsychotics and the Combination for People with First Episode Psychosis: A Two-Study Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data. 认知行为疗法、抗精神病药物及联合治疗首发精神病患者的相对疗效:对个体参与者数据的两项研究汇总分析
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf121
Anthony P Morrison, Melissa Pyle, Heather Law, Richard Emsley, Graeme MacLennan, Jemma Hudson

Background: There is little head-to-head data comparing cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and antipsychotic medication (APs). However, several recent trials have been conducted in first episode psychosis. We report a pre-specified individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis utilizing data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with similar designs to examine relative effectiveness.

Study design: The outcomes were psychiatric symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: PANSS) and recovery (Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery: QPR) at 6 months. One-stage and two-stage IPD meta-analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Serious adverse events are also summarized.

Study results: Two RCTs were included in the pooled IPD analysis which provided 136 participants. For PANSS total at 6 months, the one-stage meta-analysis found no evidence of a difference between CBTp alone and APs alone (mean difference 2.58, 95% CI, -2.83 to 7.98; P-value 0.35) and CBTp alone compared with APs plus CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14 to 0.31; P-value 0.063). For APs alone compared to CBTp plus APs there was evidence of a difference (MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65 to -2.33; P-value 0.007) favoring the combined treatment. For user-defined recovery (QPR), there was a difference favoring CBTp plus APs in comparison to both CBTp alone (P-value 0.029) and APs alone (P-value 0.026), but no difference between the monotherapies (P-value 0.91). The most common serious adverse events were psychiatric hospital admissions.

Conclusions: Cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis and APs did not differ in their effects on symptoms or recovery, but there were suggestions that the combined treatment may be superior. A definitive RCT is warranted.

背景:目前很少有比较认知行为治疗(CBTp)和抗精神病药物(APs)的正面数据。然而,最近在首发精神病中进行了一些试验。我们报告了一项预先指定的个体参与者数据(IPD)汇总分析,利用两项设计相似的随机对照试验(rct)的数据来检验相对有效性。研究设计:结果为6个月时的精神症状(阳性和阴性症状量表:PANSS)和恢复情况(康复过程问卷:QPR)。基于意向治疗原则进行一期和两期IPD荟萃分析。严重的不良事件也进行了总结。研究结果:两项随机对照试验纳入合并IPD分析,共有136名参与者。对于6个月时的总PANSS,单阶段荟萃分析未发现单独CBTp与单独APs(平均差2.58,95% CI, -2.83至7.98;p值0.35)和单独CBTp与APs加CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14至0.31;p值0.063)之间存在差异的证据。与CBTp加APs相比,单独使用APs有证据表明,联合治疗有差异(MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65至-2.33;p值0.007)。对于自定义恢复(QPR),与单独使用CBTp (p值为0.029)和单独使用APs (p值为0.026)相比,CBTp加ap更有利,但单一治疗之间无差异(p值为0.91)。最常见的严重不良事件是精神病院。结论:认知行为疗法治疗精神病和ap在症状和恢复方面没有差异,但联合治疗可能更优。有必要进行明确的随机对照试验。
{"title":"Relative Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Antipsychotics and the Combination for People with First Episode Psychosis: A Two-Study Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data.","authors":"Anthony P Morrison, Melissa Pyle, Heather Law, Richard Emsley, Graeme MacLennan, Jemma Hudson","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf121","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little head-to-head data comparing cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and antipsychotic medication (APs). However, several recent trials have been conducted in first episode psychosis. We report a pre-specified individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis utilizing data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with similar designs to examine relative effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The outcomes were psychiatric symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: PANSS) and recovery (Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery: QPR) at 6 months. One-stage and two-stage IPD meta-analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Serious adverse events are also summarized.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Two RCTs were included in the pooled IPD analysis which provided 136 participants. For PANSS total at 6 months, the one-stage meta-analysis found no evidence of a difference between CBTp alone and APs alone (mean difference 2.58, 95% CI, -2.83 to 7.98; P-value 0.35) and CBTp alone compared with APs plus CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14 to 0.31; P-value 0.063). For APs alone compared to CBTp plus APs there was evidence of a difference (MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65 to -2.33; P-value 0.007) favoring the combined treatment. For user-defined recovery (QPR), there was a difference favoring CBTp plus APs in comparison to both CBTp alone (P-value 0.029) and APs alone (P-value 0.026), but no difference between the monotherapies (P-value 0.91). The most common serious adverse events were psychiatric hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis and APs did not differ in their effects on symptoms or recovery, but there were suggestions that the combined treatment may be superior. A definitive RCT is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining Psychosis Risk in Sexual Minority Youth: Increased Exposure to and Differential Impact of the Social Envirome in Early Adolescence. 检视性少数青少年的精神病风险:青少年早期社会环境的增加与不同影响。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae216
Margaux Sageot, Inez Myin-Germeys, Robin Achterhof, Ruud van Winkel

Background and hypotheses: Sexual minority populations have a higher prevalence of psychotic experiences (PE), possibly due to differential experiences within the social envirome in its positive (eg, social support, parenting) and negative aspects (eg, adverse life events, bullying). This study hypothesized that (1) sexual minority adolescents experience more PE, (2) are more exposed to harmful aspects of the social envirome, and (3) may display differential sensitivity to certain aspects of the social envirome.

Study design: Data from 678 adolescents (mean age 15.6 years) were analyzed. Psychotic experiences were assessed using the Prodromal Questionnaire 16 (PQ-16). Aspects of the social envirome (childhood adversity, bullying, parenting style, and social support) were evaluated using different questionnaires.

Study results: The odds ratio of having sexual minority status (SMS) was 1.98 (95 CI%, 1.02-3.84) for participants with PE (PQ-16 ≥ 6) compared to participants without. Significant associations were found between SMS and more adverse childhood experiences (95% CI, 0.11-3.51) and parenting psychological control (95% CI, 0.11-0.53), and less parenting autonomy support (95% CI, -0.37 to -0.01). There were also significant differential effects: adverse childhood experiences were associated with PE in heterosexuals but not in sexual minorities (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), while less social support was associated with more PE in heterosexuals but less PE in sexual minorities (95% CI, 0.06-0.39).

Conclusions: Sexual minority status is associated with a higher prevalence of PE, greater exposure to harmful factors within the social envirome, and differential effects on sexual minority and heterosexual individuals. These results emphasize the need for a fine-grained analysis of the envirome to understand the increased risk for PE in sexual minorities.

背景和假设:性少数人群精神病经历(PE)的患病率较高,可能是由于社会环境中积极方面(如社会支持、养育子女)和消极方面(如不良生活事件、欺凌)的不同经历。本研究假设:(1)性少数青少年经历了更多的体育锻炼,(2)更多地暴露于社会环境的有害方面,(3)可能对社会环境的某些方面表现出不同的敏感性。研究设计:分析678名青少年(平均年龄15.6岁)的数据。使用前驱症状问卷16 (PQ-16)评估精神病经历。社会环境的各个方面(童年逆境、欺凌、父母教养方式和社会支持)使用不同的问卷进行评估。研究结果:PE患者(PQ-16≥6)与非PE患者相比,性少数状态(SMS)的比值比为1.98 (95 CI%, 1.02-3.84)。短信与不良童年经历(95% CI, 0.11-3.51)、父母心理控制(95% CI, 0.11-0.53)和父母自主支持(95% CI, -0.37至-0.01)之间存在显著关联。也有显著的差异效应:不良的童年经历与异性恋者的PE相关,但在性少数群体中没有(95% CI, -0.34至-0.03),而较少的社会支持与异性恋者的PE相关,但在性少数群体中PE较少(95% CI, 0.06-0.39)。结论:性少数群体与较高的PE患病率、更多的社会环境中有害因素的暴露以及对性少数群体和异性恋个体的不同影响有关。这些结果强调需要对环境进行细致的分析,以了解性少数群体中PE风险增加的原因。
{"title":"Examining Psychosis Risk in Sexual Minority Youth: Increased Exposure to and Differential Impact of the Social Envirome in Early Adolescence.","authors":"Margaux Sageot, Inez Myin-Germeys, Robin Achterhof, Ruud van Winkel","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae216","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>Sexual minority populations have a higher prevalence of psychotic experiences (PE), possibly due to differential experiences within the social envirome in its positive (eg, social support, parenting) and negative aspects (eg, adverse life events, bullying). This study hypothesized that (1) sexual minority adolescents experience more PE, (2) are more exposed to harmful aspects of the social envirome, and (3) may display differential sensitivity to certain aspects of the social envirome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Data from 678 adolescents (mean age 15.6 years) were analyzed. Psychotic experiences were assessed using the Prodromal Questionnaire 16 (PQ-16). Aspects of the social envirome (childhood adversity, bullying, parenting style, and social support) were evaluated using different questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>The odds ratio of having sexual minority status (SMS) was 1.98 (95 CI%, 1.02-3.84) for participants with PE (PQ-16 ≥ 6) compared to participants without. Significant associations were found between SMS and more adverse childhood experiences (95% CI, 0.11-3.51) and parenting psychological control (95% CI, 0.11-0.53), and less parenting autonomy support (95% CI, -0.37 to -0.01). There were also significant differential effects: adverse childhood experiences were associated with PE in heterosexuals but not in sexual minorities (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), while less social support was associated with more PE in heterosexuals but less PE in sexual minorities (95% CI, 0.06-0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sexual minority status is associated with a higher prevalence of PE, greater exposure to harmful factors within the social envirome, and differential effects on sexual minority and heterosexual individuals. These results emphasize the need for a fine-grained analysis of the envirome to understand the increased risk for PE in sexual minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimavanserin as an Adjunctive Treatment for the Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (ADVANCE-2) in Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms. 一项3期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估匹马万色林作为精神分裂症阴性症状(ADVANCE-2)患者辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf034
Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, I-Yuan Liu, Celso Arango, Stephen R Marder

Background and hypotheses: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) carry a substantial burden, and there are no treatments currently approved for NSS. The efficacy of pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist and antagonist, in treating NSS was assessed.

Study design: ADVANCE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pimavanserin in patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pimavanserin (34 mg/day) or placebo alongside ongoing background antipsychotic medication. Eligible adults were aged 18-55 years and had access to a caregiver. The primary and key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 26 in the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) total score and Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale-Severity (CGI-SCH-S) negative symptom score, respectively.

Study results: Of the 454 randomized patients, 71 (39 placebo; 32 pimavanserin) discontinued and 383 (188 placebo; 195 pimavanserin) completed the study. The safety and full analysis sets comprised 453 and 446 patients, respectively. The NSA-16 change from baseline to week 26 was not significantly different between groups (least squares mean difference: -0.67; SE, 0.95; [95% CI: -2.54, 1.20]; P = .48; Cohen's d effect size: 0.07). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 30.4% with pimavanserin and 40.3% with placebo.

Conclusions: In this study, pimavanserin was well tolerated, and although it demonstrated a similar treatment effect as in the prior phase 2 study favoring pimavanserin, treatment with pimavanserin vs placebo did not result in significant differences for primary or other endpoints.

背景和假设:精神分裂症(NSS)的阴性症状带来了巨大的负担,目前还没有批准用于NSS的治疗方法。评估选择性5-HT2A逆激动剂和拮抗剂匹马万色林治疗NSS的疗效。研究设计:ADVANCE-2是一项3期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究,匹马万色林用于精神分裂症患者,主要症状为阴性。患者随机(1:1)接受匹马万色林(34 mg/天)或安慰剂,同时接受持续的背景抗精神病药物治疗。符合条件的成年人年龄在18-55岁之间,并且可以获得照顾者。主要终点和关键次要终点分别是阴性症状评估-16 (NSA-16)总分和临床总体印象-精神分裂症量表-严重程度(CGI-SCH-S)阴性症状评分从基线到第26周的变化。研究结果:在454例随机患者中,71例(安慰剂39例;匹马万塞林32例,383例(安慰剂188例;195匹马万色林)完成研究。安全性和完整分析组分别包括453例和446例患者。从基线到第26周,两组之间的NSA-16变化无显著差异(最小二乘平均差:-0.67;, 0.95;[95% ci: -2.54, 1.20];p = .48;科恩效应值:0.07)。治疗后出现的不良事件在匹马万色林组中为30.4%,在安慰剂组中为40.3%。结论:在这项研究中,匹马万色林耐受性良好,尽管它显示出与先前支持匹马万色林的2期研究相似的治疗效果,但在主要终点或其他终点上,匹马万色林与安慰剂的治疗并没有显著差异。
{"title":"A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pimavanserin as an Adjunctive Treatment for the Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (ADVANCE-2) in Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms.","authors":"Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, I-Yuan Liu, Celso Arango, Stephen R Marder","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf034","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypotheses: </strong>Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) carry a substantial burden, and there are no treatments currently approved for NSS. The efficacy of pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist and antagonist, in treating NSS was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>ADVANCE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pimavanserin in patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pimavanserin (34 mg/day) or placebo alongside ongoing background antipsychotic medication. Eligible adults were aged 18-55 years and had access to a caregiver. The primary and key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 26 in the Negative Symptom Assessment-16 (NSA-16) total score and Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale-Severity (CGI-SCH-S) negative symptom score, respectively.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Of the 454 randomized patients, 71 (39 placebo; 32 pimavanserin) discontinued and 383 (188 placebo; 195 pimavanserin) completed the study. The safety and full analysis sets comprised 453 and 446 patients, respectively. The NSA-16 change from baseline to week 26 was not significantly different between groups (least squares mean difference: -0.67; SE, 0.95; [95% CI: -2.54, 1.20]; P = .48; Cohen's d effect size: 0.07). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 30.4% with pimavanserin and 40.3% with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, pimavanserin was well tolerated, and although it demonstrated a similar treatment effect as in the prior phase 2 study favoring pimavanserin, treatment with pimavanserin vs placebo did not result in significant differences for primary or other endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143781005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship of Perceived Burdensomeness and Thwarted Belongingness to Suicide Ideation Persistence and Suicide Behavior Over 12 Months in People With Serious Mental Illness. 重度精神疾病患者12个月以上自杀意念持续和自杀行为的感知负担和受挫归属关系
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf023
Emma M Parrish, Kevin Kuehn, Amy Pinkham, Raeanne C Moore, Philip D Harvey, Eric Granholm, Scott Roesch, Thomas Joiner, Varsha D Badal, Colin A Depp

Background and hypothesis: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of suicide ideation (SI) and suicide behavior (SB). Longitudinal studies on factors contributing to SI/SB in SMI are lacking. Interpersonal biases (ie, perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) are cross-sectionally related to SI/SB, but do they relate to longitudinal suicide risk or other illness factors? Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a powerful approach to a deeper understanding of these complex relationships.

Study design: Participants with SMI (N = 180) completed 3 in-lab visits (baseline, 6-month, and 12-month) and 10 days of EMA (3×/day) following the baseline visit. At all timepoints, participants were assessed for SI/SB and were classified as persistent, intermittent, or no SI or any reports of SB over the 12-month follow-up. Multinomial logistic regression models examined whether EMA burdensomeness, belongingness, social motivations, and psychotic symptoms predicted SI persistence or SB over 12 months. Time-series network analysis compared participants' EMA data by baseline SI.

Study results: Burdensomeness and belongingness related to persistent SI 12 months, as did voices, suspiciousness, and social motivations. Only burdensomeness and belongingness related to increased risk of SB over 12 months. Network analyses revealed unique lagged relationships in the baseline SI group: of suspiciousness to belongingness and social avoidance motivation to burdensomeness when compared to the baseline group without SI.

Conclusions: These findings indicate the importance of interpersonal risk factors and suspiciousness to trajectories of SI and SB over 12 months in SMI. Pending replication, these constructs may be potential suicide prevention treatment targets in SMI.

背景与假设:重度精神疾病(SMI)患者有较高的自杀意念(SI)和自杀行为(SB)风险。缺乏对重度精神分裂症患者SI/SB的影响因素的纵向研究。人际偏见(即感知负担和受挫的归属感)与SI/SB横断面相关,但它们与纵向自杀风险或其他疾病因素有关吗?生态瞬时评估(EMA)为深入理解这些复杂关系提供了一种强有力的方法。研究设计:重度精神障碍患者(N = 180)在基线随访后完成3次实验室随访(基线、6个月和12个月)和10天EMA(3次/天)。在所有时间点,对参与者进行SI/SB评估,并在12个月的随访中分为持续性、间歇性、无SI或任何SB报告。多项逻辑回归模型检验了EMA负担、归属感、社会动机和精神病症状是否预测SI持续或SB超过12个月。时间序列网络分析通过基线SI比较参与者的EMA数据。研究结果:负担感和归属感与持续12个月的SI有关,声音、怀疑和社会动机也是如此。只有负担和归属感与超过12个月的SB风险增加有关。网络分析揭示了基线科学探究组中独特的滞后关系:与没有科学探究的基线组相比,怀疑到归属和社会回避动机到负担。结论:这些发现表明人际危险因素和怀疑对重度精神分裂症患者12个月内的SI和SB发展轨迹具有重要意义。等待复制,这些结构可能是潜在的SMI自杀预防治疗目标。
{"title":"Relationship of Perceived Burdensomeness and Thwarted Belongingness to Suicide Ideation Persistence and Suicide Behavior Over 12 Months in People With Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Emma M Parrish, Kevin Kuehn, Amy Pinkham, Raeanne C Moore, Philip D Harvey, Eric Granholm, Scott Roesch, Thomas Joiner, Varsha D Badal, Colin A Depp","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf023","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>People with serious mental illness (SMI) have an increased risk of suicide ideation (SI) and suicide behavior (SB). Longitudinal studies on factors contributing to SI/SB in SMI are lacking. Interpersonal biases (ie, perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness) are cross-sectionally related to SI/SB, but do they relate to longitudinal suicide risk or other illness factors? Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers a powerful approach to a deeper understanding of these complex relationships.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Participants with SMI (N = 180) completed 3 in-lab visits (baseline, 6-month, and 12-month) and 10 days of EMA (3×/day) following the baseline visit. At all timepoints, participants were assessed for SI/SB and were classified as persistent, intermittent, or no SI or any reports of SB over the 12-month follow-up. Multinomial logistic regression models examined whether EMA burdensomeness, belongingness, social motivations, and psychotic symptoms predicted SI persistence or SB over 12 months. Time-series network analysis compared participants' EMA data by baseline SI.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Burdensomeness and belongingness related to persistent SI 12 months, as did voices, suspiciousness, and social motivations. Only burdensomeness and belongingness related to increased risk of SB over 12 months. Network analyses revealed unique lagged relationships in the baseline SI group: of suspiciousness to belongingness and social avoidance motivation to burdensomeness when compared to the baseline group without SI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate the importance of interpersonal risk factors and suspiciousness to trajectories of SI and SB over 12 months in SMI. Pending replication, these constructs may be potential suicide prevention treatment targets in SMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143625784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeting Positive Affect as a Way to Improve Social Anhedonia in Schizophrenia. 以积极情绪为目标,改善精神分裂症患者的社交快感缺失。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf117
Lauren T Catalano, Pooja K Patel, Lauren P Weittenhiller, Michael F Green

Background: The reduced interest in, pleasure from, and motivation for social connection (clinically referred to as social anhedonia) significantly contributes to social dysfunction in schizophrenia. However, social anhedonia in schizophrenia has been challenging to treat. A new wave of psychosocial interventions for anhedonia, referred to as "positive affect interventions", have been validated in depression, but have not been widely applied in schizophrenia.

Study design: The goal of this narrative review article is to introduce positive affect interventions as a novel approach to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia. We provide a narrative review of (1) the current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia; (2) the current positive affect intervention strategies for motivational deficits in depression; (3) the reward mechanisms (responsivity, learning, and valuation) that may differentially impact treatment response in schizophrenia vs depression; and (4) adaptations that might be needed to implement positive affect interventions in schizophrenia.

Study results: Compared with current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia, positive affect interventions have a greater emphasis on increasing positive affect (via reward mechanisms) to increase motivated social behavior. Adaptations of positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia might consider challenges with social goal-setting, negative social interactions, and social avoidance.

Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions that target positive affect could ultimately lead to greater improvements in social connection in schizophrenia. Recommendations for next steps to validate positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia are discussed.

背景:对社会联系的兴趣、快感和动机的降低(临床上称为社会快感缺乏)是精神分裂症患者社交功能障碍的重要原因。然而,精神分裂症患者的社交快感缺乏症的治疗一直具有挑战性。一种针对快感缺乏的新的社会心理干预,被称为“积极影响干预”,已在抑郁症中得到证实,但尚未广泛应用于精神分裂症。研究设计:这篇叙述性综述文章的目的是介绍积极影响干预作为一种治疗精神分裂症社交快感缺乏的新方法。我们提供了一个叙述性的回顾:(1)目前对精神分裂症动机缺陷的社会心理干预;(2)当前抑郁症动机缺陷的正向影响干预策略;(3)对精神分裂症和抑郁症治疗反应有不同影响的奖励机制(反应性、学习和评价);(4)在精神分裂症中实施积极影响干预可能需要的适应性。研究结果:与目前针对精神分裂症动机缺陷的心理社会干预相比,积极影响干预更强调通过奖励机制增加积极影响,以增加动机社会行为。积极影响干预治疗精神分裂症的社会快感缺乏症可能会考虑社会目标设定、消极社会互动和社会回避的挑战。结论:以积极影响为目标的社会心理干预可能最终导致精神分裂症患者社会联系的更大改善。建议下一步验证积极影响干预治疗精神分裂症的社会快感缺乏症。
{"title":"Targeting Positive Affect as a Way to Improve Social Anhedonia in Schizophrenia.","authors":"Lauren T Catalano, Pooja K Patel, Lauren P Weittenhiller, Michael F Green","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reduced interest in, pleasure from, and motivation for social connection (clinically referred to as social anhedonia) significantly contributes to social dysfunction in schizophrenia. However, social anhedonia in schizophrenia has been challenging to treat. A new wave of psychosocial interventions for anhedonia, referred to as \"positive affect interventions\", have been validated in depression, but have not been widely applied in schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The goal of this narrative review article is to introduce positive affect interventions as a novel approach to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia. We provide a narrative review of (1) the current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia; (2) the current positive affect intervention strategies for motivational deficits in depression; (3) the reward mechanisms (responsivity, learning, and valuation) that may differentially impact treatment response in schizophrenia vs depression; and (4) adaptations that might be needed to implement positive affect interventions in schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Compared with current psychosocial interventions for motivational deficits in schizophrenia, positive affect interventions have a greater emphasis on increasing positive affect (via reward mechanisms) to increase motivated social behavior. Adaptations of positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia might consider challenges with social goal-setting, negative social interactions, and social avoidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychosocial interventions that target positive affect could ultimately lead to greater improvements in social connection in schizophrenia. Recommendations for next steps to validate positive affect interventions to treat social anhedonia in schizophrenia are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809817/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of AVATAR Therapy on Voice Hearing in Everyday Life: ESM Outcomes of the AVATAR2 Trial. AVATAR治疗对日常生活中语音听力的影响:AVATAR2试验的ESM结果
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf100
Clementine J Edwards, Robin Smith, Ginette Lafit, Thomas Ward, Richard Emsley, Mar Rus-Calafell, Inez Myin-Germeys, Emmanuelle Peters, Sandra Bucci, Thomas K Craig, Gillian Haddock, Hannah Ball, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Amy Hardy, Hamish McLeod, Andrew I Gumley, Jeffrey McDonnell, Alice Montague, Moya Clancy, Mark Huckvale, Philippa Anne Garety

AVATAR therapy involves facilitated dialogs between a voice hearer and a digital embodiment of their distressing voice ("the avatar"). We conducted a multi-site single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of brief (AV-BRF) and extended (AV-EXT) forms of AVATAR therapy, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) alone (AVATAR2). This study reports the data from experience sampling method (ESM) assessments conducted at baseline, end of therapy (16 weeks), and follow-up (28 weeks). The research questions focused on whether those in the AV-BRF or AV-EXT arms experienced less voice-related distress, anxiety, and beliefs as measured by ESM, compared to TAU. Separate mixed-effects models were fitted for each research question. The final sample (n = 200) completed approximately 40% of questionnaires across all timepoints. Participants who received AV-EXT therapy, but not AV-BRF, reported reduced momentary voice-related distress at 16 (P = .022) and 28 weeks (p = .029). Appraisals of voice control were also reduced in the AV-EXT arm at 16 weeks when the voice was present (P = .002) or not (P = .008). Voice power appraisals were reduced (P < .035) in both arms when the voice was "not present but on my mind" at all timepoints. There were no changes in the frequency of voice hearing, appraisals of voice intent, or assertive responding. These findings from everyday life, reported for the first time, provide evidence of the impact on the primary AVATAR therapy treatment targets, including appraisals of voice power and control. The weight of evidence favors the AV-EXT protocol in the further development and implementation of AVATAR therapy.

阿凡达治疗包括声音听者和他们痛苦声音的数字化身(“阿凡达”)之间的对话。我们进行了一项多地点单盲随机对照试验,以评估短期(AV-BRF)和延长(AV-EXT)形式的AVATAR治疗与单独常规治疗(TAU) (AVATAR2)的疗效。本研究报告了在基线、治疗结束(16周)和随访(28周)进行的经验抽样法(ESM)评估的数据。研究问题的重点是,与TAU相比,AV-BRF或AV-EXT组的人是否经历了更少的声音相关的痛苦、焦虑和信念。为每个研究问题拟合了单独的混合效应模型。最终样本(n = 200)在所有时间点完成了大约40%的问卷调查。接受AV-EXT治疗而非AV-BRF治疗的参与者在16周(P = 0.022)和28周(P = 0.029)时报告的瞬时声音相关痛苦减少。在AV-EXT组中,当声音存在或不存在时,声音控制的评估也在16周时降低(P = 0.002)。声音权力评价降低(P
{"title":"The Impact of AVATAR Therapy on Voice Hearing in Everyday Life: ESM Outcomes of the AVATAR2 Trial.","authors":"Clementine J Edwards, Robin Smith, Ginette Lafit, Thomas Ward, Richard Emsley, Mar Rus-Calafell, Inez Myin-Germeys, Emmanuelle Peters, Sandra Bucci, Thomas K Craig, Gillian Haddock, Hannah Ball, Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo, Amy Hardy, Hamish McLeod, Andrew I Gumley, Jeffrey McDonnell, Alice Montague, Moya Clancy, Mark Huckvale, Philippa Anne Garety","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf100","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AVATAR therapy involves facilitated dialogs between a voice hearer and a digital embodiment of their distressing voice (\"the avatar\"). We conducted a multi-site single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of brief (AV-BRF) and extended (AV-EXT) forms of AVATAR therapy, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) alone (AVATAR2). This study reports the data from experience sampling method (ESM) assessments conducted at baseline, end of therapy (16 weeks), and follow-up (28 weeks). The research questions focused on whether those in the AV-BRF or AV-EXT arms experienced less voice-related distress, anxiety, and beliefs as measured by ESM, compared to TAU. Separate mixed-effects models were fitted for each research question. The final sample (n = 200) completed approximately 40% of questionnaires across all timepoints. Participants who received AV-EXT therapy, but not AV-BRF, reported reduced momentary voice-related distress at 16 (P = .022) and 28 weeks (p = .029). Appraisals of voice control were also reduced in the AV-EXT arm at 16 weeks when the voice was present (P = .002) or not (P = .008). Voice power appraisals were reduced (P < .035) in both arms when the voice was \"not present but on my mind\" at all timepoints. There were no changes in the frequency of voice hearing, appraisals of voice intent, or assertive responding. These findings from everyday life, reported for the first time, provide evidence of the impact on the primary AVATAR therapy treatment targets, including appraisals of voice power and control. The weight of evidence favors the AV-EXT protocol in the further development and implementation of AVATAR therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological Interventions for Persons With Co-occurring Psychotic and Traumatic-Stress Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 精神病和创伤性应激症状共存者的心理干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf185
Helen Niemeyer, Felix Opper, Michel Sabé, Emily A Holmes, Kerem Böge

Background and hypothesis: Psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms commonly co-occur. Psychological interventions have increasingly targeted these co-occurring symptoms. However, information on their efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability is limited in this evolving field.

Study design: After preregistration at PROSPERO (CRD42024553934), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions with persons aged 16+ reporting both psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science were searched in July 2024. We used the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB-2) for bias assessment. Random-effects models were used to synthesize clinical outcomes, while meta-regression was applied when 10 effect sizes were reported per outcome.

Study results: We included 10 RCTs with 559 participants. Interventions primarily targeted trauma-related symptoms and were seemingly tolerable and acceptable, with low adverse event profiles and a dropout rate of 14%. In comparison to usual treatments and active control treatments, interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at post-treatment (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), with meta-regression favoring interventions primarily employing exposure (gdiff = 0.59, [0.22, 0.97]). Interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at follow-up (g = 0.34, [0.12, 0.56]), but not total psychotic, positive, or negative symptoms at either timeframe.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that psychological interventions for co-occurring psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms are safe, tolerable, and may reduce traumatic-stress symptoms when employing exposure. Considering the substantial risk of bias, the small number of trials, non-significant results for other clinical and functional outcomes, and unexplained heterogeneity, further research is needed.

背景与假设:精神和创伤性应激症状通常同时发生。心理干预越来越多地针对这些共同出现的症状。然而,在这个不断发展的领域,关于它们的功效、耐受性和可接受性的信息是有限的。研究设计:在普洛斯普洛斯(CRD42024553934)预注册后,我们对16岁以上报告精神病和创伤应激症状的人进行了心理干预的随机对照试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析。2024年7月检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Clinicaltrials.gov和Web of Science。我们使用改进的Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具(rob2)进行偏倚评估。随机效应模型用于综合临床结果,而当每个结果报告10个效应大小时,应用元回归。研究结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共559名受试者。干预措施主要针对创伤相关症状,似乎是可容忍和可接受的,不良事件发生率低,辍学率为14%。与常规治疗和积极对照治疗相比,干预措施显著降低了治疗后的创伤应激症状(g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), meta回归倾向于主要采用暴露的干预措施(gdiff = 0.59,[0.22, 0.97])。干预措施在随访中显著降低了创伤应激症状(g = 0.34,[0.12, 0.56]),但在任何一个时间框架内都没有减少总精神病性、阳性或阴性症状。结论:研究结果表明,对精神病和创伤应激症状同时发生的心理干预是安全的、可容忍的,并且在使用暴露时可能减轻创伤应激症状。考虑到较大的偏倚风险、试验数量少、其他临床和功能结局的结果不显著以及无法解释的异质性,需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Psychological Interventions for Persons With Co-occurring Psychotic and Traumatic-Stress Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Helen Niemeyer, Felix Opper, Michel Sabé, Emily A Holmes, Kerem Böge","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf185","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms commonly co-occur. Psychological interventions have increasingly targeted these co-occurring symptoms. However, information on their efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability is limited in this evolving field.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>After preregistration at PROSPERO (CRD42024553934), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions with persons aged 16+ reporting both psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science were searched in July 2024. We used the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB-2) for bias assessment. Random-effects models were used to synthesize clinical outcomes, while meta-regression was applied when 10 effect sizes were reported per outcome.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>We included 10 RCTs with 559 participants. Interventions primarily targeted trauma-related symptoms and were seemingly tolerable and acceptable, with low adverse event profiles and a dropout rate of 14%. In comparison to usual treatments and active control treatments, interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at post-treatment (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.08, 0.57]), with meta-regression favoring interventions primarily employing exposure (gdiff = 0.59, [0.22, 0.97]). Interventions significantly decreased traumatic-stress symptoms at follow-up (g = 0.34, [0.12, 0.56]), but not total psychotic, positive, or negative symptoms at either timeframe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that psychological interventions for co-occurring psychotic and traumatic-stress symptoms are safe, tolerable, and may reduce traumatic-stress symptoms when employing exposure. Considering the substantial risk of bias, the small number of trials, non-significant results for other clinical and functional outcomes, and unexplained heterogeneity, further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Yoga-Based Group Intervention for Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders-Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of a Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. 针对精神分裂症谱系障碍住院患者的瑜伽小组干预--一项评分者对照随机对照试验的可行性、可接受性和初步结果。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae198
Inge Hahne, Marco Zierhut, Niklas Bergmann, Eric Hahn, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Claudia Calvano, Malek Bajbouj, Kerem Böge

Background and hypothesis: The efficacy of yoga as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) has garnered interest. While yoga may positively influence various symptom domains, further investigation is needed due to the limited number, quality, and generalizability of studies. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability (primary outcome) of a yoga-based group intervention (YoGI) developed in a participatory approach and explored its preliminary effectiveness.

Study design: In addition to the primary outcomes, this preregistered randomized controlled trial examined rater-blinded general psychopathology, positive- and negative symptoms, and self-rated depression, anxiety, stress, body mindfulness, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognition, social functioning, quality of life, and medication regime at baseline and postintervention as secondary outcomes.

Study results: Fifty inpatients with SSD received either TAU (n = 25) or YoGI + TAU (n = 25) for four weeks. Outcomes showed 95% protocol adherence of YoGI, feasibility, and retention rates of 91% and 94%, respectively, and a dropout rate of 6%. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group postintervention improvements for YoGI + TAU in positive symptoms, depression, cognitive fusion, and a mindfulness subscale. Medium-to-large pre- to postintervention effects were found for body mindfulness, positive, negative, and general psychopathology, cognitive fusion, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and attention in YoGI + TAU, while within-group changes were consistently smaller in TAU. No severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: This trial supports the feasibility and acceptability of YoGI for inpatients with SSD and provides preliminary evidence of YoGI's benefits beyond TAU. Further robust, multicentric RCTs are warranted to deepen our understanding of YoGI's therapeutic potential and inform clinical interventions for SSD.

背景与假设:瑜伽作为精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)的一种辅助治疗方法,其疗效已引起人们的兴趣。虽然瑜伽可能会对各种症状领域产生积极影响,但由于研究的数量、质量和普及性有限,还需要进一步调查。本研究评估了以参与式方法开发的瑜伽小组干预(YoGI)的可行性和可接受性(主要结果),并探讨了其初步有效性:除主要结果外,这项预先登记的随机对照试验还对基线和干预后的一般精神病理学、阳性和阴性症状、自我评定的抑郁、焦虑、压力、身体正念、正念、心理灵活性、认知、社会功能、生活质量和用药制度等进行了评分盲查,并将其作为次要结果:50 名患有 SSD 的住院患者接受了为期四周的 TAU(25 人)或 YoGI + TAU(25 人)治疗。结果显示,YoGI 的方案依从性为 95%,可行性和保留率分别为 91% 和 94%,辍学率为 6%。方差分析显示,YoGI + TAU 在积极症状、抑郁、认知融合和正念子量表方面的干预后组间改善明显。在YoGI + TAU的身体正念、积极、消极和一般心理病理学、认知融合、抑郁、焦虑、压力、生活质量和注意力方面,发现了干预前和干预后的中至大影响,而TAU的组内变化一直较小。无严重不良事件报告:这项试验证明了对 SSD 住院患者使用 YoGI 的可行性和可接受性,并初步证明了 YoGI 在 TAU 之外的益处。有必要进一步开展稳健的多中心 RCT,以加深我们对 YoGI 治疗潜力的了解,并为 SSD 的临床干预提供依据。
{"title":"Yoga-Based Group Intervention for Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders-Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of a Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Inge Hahne, Marco Zierhut, Niklas Bergmann, Eric Hahn, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Claudia Calvano, Malek Bajbouj, Kerem Böge","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbae198","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbae198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The efficacy of yoga as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) has garnered interest. While yoga may positively influence various symptom domains, further investigation is needed due to the limited number, quality, and generalizability of studies. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability (primary outcome) of a yoga-based group intervention (YoGI) developed in a participatory approach and explored its preliminary effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In addition to the primary outcomes, this preregistered randomized controlled trial examined rater-blinded general psychopathology, positive- and negative symptoms, and self-rated depression, anxiety, stress, body mindfulness, mindfulness, psychological flexibility, cognition, social functioning, quality of life, and medication regime at baseline and postintervention as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Fifty inpatients with SSD received either TAU (n = 25) or YoGI + TAU (n = 25) for four weeks. Outcomes showed 95% protocol adherence of YoGI, feasibility, and retention rates of 91% and 94%, respectively, and a dropout rate of 6%. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group postintervention improvements for YoGI + TAU in positive symptoms, depression, cognitive fusion, and a mindfulness subscale. Medium-to-large pre- to postintervention effects were found for body mindfulness, positive, negative, and general psychopathology, cognitive fusion, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and attention in YoGI + TAU, while within-group changes were consistently smaller in TAU. No severe adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial supports the feasibility and acceptability of YoGI for inpatients with SSD and provides preliminary evidence of YoGI's benefits beyond TAU. Further robust, multicentric RCTs are warranted to deepen our understanding of YoGI's therapeutic potential and inform clinical interventions for SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Learning How to Improve the Treatment of Persecutory Delusions: Using a Principal Trajectories Analysis to Examine Differential Effects of Two Psychological Interventions (Feeling Safe, Befriending) in Distinct Groups of Patients. 学习如何改善对迫害性妄想的治疗:使用主轨迹分析来检验两种心理干预(感觉安全,结交朋友)在不同患者群体中的不同效果。
IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf083
Lucy Jenner, Mollie Payne, Felicity Waite, Helen Beckwith, Rowan Diamond, Louise Isham, Nicola Collett, Richard Emsley, Daniel Freeman

Background: A theory-driven cognitive therapy (Feeling Safe) has produced much better outcomes for patients with persecutory delusions. There are four distinct response classes: very high delusion conviction with large improvement, very high delusion conviction with no response, high delusion conviction with large improvement, and high delusion conviction with modest improvement. Our objective was to apply principal trajectories analysis, a novel statistical method, to original trial data to estimate whether these groups may have responded differently to a different intervention: befriending.

Design: One hundred and thirty patients with persistent persecutory delusions were randomised to six months of Feeling Safe or befriending. Baseline assessments were used to assign patients allocated to befriending (who did not receive Feeling Safe) into the four Feeling Safe response classes. The treatment effect, including on potential mediators, was then estimated for these classes.

Results: Patients in two treatment response classes (Very high conviction/large improvement, High conviction/large improvement) benefited more from Feeling Safe, patients in one group (Very high conviction/no improvement) benefited more from befriending, and patients in the remaining group (High conviction/moderate improvement) benefited equally from the interventions. Mechanism differences were detected when Feeling Safe was superior to befriending, but not when befriending was superior.

Conclusions: There may be patients with psychosis who benefit more from one type of therapy than another, likely due to different change mechanisms. The application of principal trajectories has generated testable hypotheses and a potential step toward personalised treatment. We recommend an investigation of whether sequential provision of the treatment types could enhance patient outcomes. Keywords: persecutory, delusions, outcome trajectories, psychosis, cognitive therapy.

背景:一种理论驱动的认知疗法(感觉安全)对迫害性妄想患者产生了更好的结果。有四种不同的反应类别非常高的妄想信念有很大的改善,非常高的妄想信念没有反应,高度妄想信念有很大的改善,高度妄想信念有适度的改善。我们的目的是应用主轨迹分析,一种新颖的统计方法,原始试验数据,以估计这些群体是否可能对不同的干预有不同的反应:交朋友。设计:130名患有持续性迫害妄想的患者被随机分配到六个月的感觉安全或交朋友。基线评估用于将被分配到友好组(未接受感觉安全组)的患者分配到四个感觉安全反应组。然后估计这些类别的治疗效果,包括对潜在介质的影响。结果:两个治疗反应组(非常高信念/大改善,高信念/大改善)的患者从感觉安全中获益更多,一组(非常高信念/无改善)的患者从交朋友中获益更多,其余组(高信念/中度改善)的患者从干预中获益相同。当感觉安全优于交友时,机制差异被发现,但当交友优于交友时,机制差异没有被发现。结论:可能有精神病患者从一种治疗中获益比另一种治疗更大,可能是由于不同的改变机制。主轨迹的应用产生了可测试的假设,并朝着个性化治疗迈出了潜在的一步。我们建议调查是否顺序提供治疗类型可以提高患者的结果。关键词:迫害,妄想,结果轨迹,精神病,认知治疗。
{"title":"Learning How to Improve the Treatment of Persecutory Delusions: Using a Principal Trajectories Analysis to Examine Differential Effects of Two Psychological Interventions (Feeling Safe, Befriending) in Distinct Groups of Patients.","authors":"Lucy Jenner, Mollie Payne, Felicity Waite, Helen Beckwith, Rowan Diamond, Louise Isham, Nicola Collett, Richard Emsley, Daniel Freeman","doi":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf083","DOIUrl":"10.1093/schbul/sbaf083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A theory-driven cognitive therapy (Feeling Safe) has produced much better outcomes for patients with persecutory delusions. There are four distinct response classes: very high delusion conviction with large improvement, very high delusion conviction with no response, high delusion conviction with large improvement, and high delusion conviction with modest improvement. Our objective was to apply principal trajectories analysis, a novel statistical method, to original trial data to estimate whether these groups may have responded differently to a different intervention: befriending.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One hundred and thirty patients with persistent persecutory delusions were randomised to six months of Feeling Safe or befriending. Baseline assessments were used to assign patients allocated to befriending (who did not receive Feeling Safe) into the four Feeling Safe response classes. The treatment effect, including on potential mediators, was then estimated for these classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in two treatment response classes (Very high conviction/large improvement, High conviction/large improvement) benefited more from Feeling Safe, patients in one group (Very high conviction/no improvement) benefited more from befriending, and patients in the remaining group (High conviction/moderate improvement) benefited equally from the interventions. Mechanism differences were detected when Feeling Safe was superior to befriending, but not when befriending was superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There may be patients with psychosis who benefit more from one type of therapy than another, likely due to different change mechanisms. The application of principal trajectories has generated testable hypotheses and a potential step toward personalised treatment. We recommend an investigation of whether sequential provision of the treatment types could enhance patient outcomes. Keywords: persecutory, delusions, outcome trajectories, psychosis, cognitive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21530,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12809788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144508057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1