首页 > 最新文献

Studies in Second Language Acquisition最新文献

英文 中文
The effects of exposure and explicit stereotypes on veracity judgments of Polish-accented English speech: A preregistered close replication and extension of Boduch-Grabka & Lev-Ari (2021) 暴露和显性刻板印象对波兰语口音英语语音真实性判断的影响:Boduch-Grabka 和 Lev-Ari (2021) 的预登记近似复制和扩展
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000123
Samantha Barlow, Greg Beardsley, Zéta Bsharah, Robin Crofts, Carlos De La Rosa, Andrea Gutierrez, Carlie Highfill, Amy Gail Wade Johnson, Caroline Johnson, Jacob Johnson, Isaac Leyva Cardenas, Jordan Taylor Martinez, Nathaniel Todd Miller, Riley Monroe Murray, Sylvia Page, Taylor Petersen, Irina Ramos, Rayvin Rhodes, Phoebe Vainuku, Brenan M. Wednesday, Emma Corrine Farnsworth, Seung Kyung Kim, Rachel Hayes-Harb
Boduch-Grabka and Lev-Ari (2021) showed that so-called “native” British-English speakers judged statements produced by Polish-accented English speakers as less likely to be true than statements produced by “native” speakers and that prior exposure to Polish-accented English speech modulates this effect. Given the real-world consequences of this study, as well as our commitment to assessing and mitigating linguistic biases, we conducted a close replication, extending the work by collecting additional information about participants’ explicit biases towards Polish migrants in the UK. We did not reproduce the original pattern of results, observing no effect of speaker accent or exposure on comprehension or veracity. In addition, the measure of explicit bias did not predict differential veracity ratings for Polish- and British-accented speech. Although the current pattern of results differs from that of the original study, our finding that neither comprehension nor veracity were impacted by accent or exposure condition is not inconsistent with the Boduch-Grabka and Lev-Ari (2021) processing difficulty account of the accent-based veracity judgment effect. We explore possible explanations for the lack of replication and future directions for this work.
Boduch-Grabka 和 Lev-Ari(2021 年)的研究表明,所谓的 "母语 "为英语的英国人对带有波兰语口音的英语人所作陈述的判断,与 "母语 "为英语的英国人所作陈述相比,真实的可能性较低,而之前接触过带有波兰语口音的英语会调节这种效应。考虑到这项研究在现实世界中的影响,以及我们对评估和减轻语言偏见的承诺,我们进行了密切的复制,通过收集有关参与者对英国波兰移民的明确偏见的额外信息来扩展这项工作。我们没有再现原来的结果模式,没有观察到说话者的口音或接触对理解力或真实性的影响。此外,显性偏见的测量结果也不能预测波兰口音和英国口音语音的不同真实性评分。虽然目前的结果模式与最初的研究不同,但我们的研究发现,口音或接触条件对理解力和真实性都没有影响,这与 Boduch-Grabka 和 Lev-Ari(2021 年)关于基于口音的真实性判断效应的处理难度解释并不矛盾。我们探讨了缺乏复制的可能原因以及这项工作的未来方向。
{"title":"The effects of exposure and explicit stereotypes on veracity judgments of Polish-accented English speech: A preregistered close replication and extension of Boduch-Grabka & Lev-Ari (2021)","authors":"Samantha Barlow, Greg Beardsley, Zéta Bsharah, Robin Crofts, Carlos De La Rosa, Andrea Gutierrez, Carlie Highfill, Amy Gail Wade Johnson, Caroline Johnson, Jacob Johnson, Isaac Leyva Cardenas, Jordan Taylor Martinez, Nathaniel Todd Miller, Riley Monroe Murray, Sylvia Page, Taylor Petersen, Irina Ramos, Rayvin Rhodes, Phoebe Vainuku, Brenan M. Wednesday, Emma Corrine Farnsworth, Seung Kyung Kim, Rachel Hayes-Harb","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000123","url":null,"abstract":"Boduch-Grabka and Lev-Ari (2021) showed that so-called “native” British-English speakers judged statements produced by Polish-accented English speakers as less likely to be true than statements produced by “native” speakers and that prior exposure to Polish-accented English speech modulates this effect. Given the real-world consequences of this study, as well as our commitment to assessing and mitigating linguistic biases, we conducted a close replication, extending the work by collecting additional information about participants’ explicit biases towards Polish migrants in the UK. We did not reproduce the original pattern of results, observing no effect of speaker accent or exposure on comprehension or veracity. In addition, the measure of explicit bias did not predict differential veracity ratings for Polish- and British-accented speech. Although the current pattern of results differs from that of the original study, our finding that neither comprehension nor veracity were impacted by accent or exposure condition is not inconsistent with the Boduch-Grabka and Lev-Ari (2021) processing difficulty account of the accent-based veracity judgment effect. We explore possible explanations for the lack of replication and future directions for this work.","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140192822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion and their relationship to cohesion ratings of English language learners’ written production 基于感知连接词的内聚力指数及其与英语学习者书面表达内聚力评分的关系
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000202
Xiaofei Lu, Renfen Hu
The use of connectives has been considered important for assessing the cohesion of written texts (Crossley et al., 2019). However, existing connective-based indices have not systematically addressed two issues of ambiguity, namely, that between discourse and non-discourse use of polysemous word forms and that in terms of the specific discourse relations marked by polysemous discourse connectives (Pitler & Nenkova, 2009). This study proposes 34 sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion that account for these issues and assesses their predictive power for cohesion ratings in comparison to 25 existing indices. Results from the analysis of 3,911 argumentative essays from the English Language Learner Insight, Proficiency and Skills Evaluation Corpus show that 23 sense-aware indices but only three existing indices correlated significantly and meaningfully with cohesion ratings. The sense-aware indices also exhibited greater predictive power for cohesion ratings than existing indices. The implications of our findings for future cohesion research are discussed.
连接词的使用被认为对评估书面文本的内聚力非常重要(Crossley 等人,2019 年)。然而,现有的基于连接词的指数并未系统地解决两个模糊问题,即多义词词形的话语和非话语使用之间的模糊问题,以及多义词话语连接词所标记的特定话语关系方面的模糊问题(Pitler & Nenkova, 2009)。本研究针对这些问题提出了 34 个基于意义感知连接词的内聚力指数,并与现有的 25 个指数相比,评估了它们对内聚力评分的预测能力。对英语语言学习者洞察力、能力和技能评估语料库中的 3,911 篇议论文进行分析的结果表明,23 个感性认识指数与内聚力评分有显著的相关性,而现有指数中只有 3 个与内聚力评分有意义的相关性。与现有指数相比,语感感知指数对内聚力评分的预测能力也更强。本文讨论了我们的发现对未来内聚力研究的影响。
{"title":"Sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion and their relationship to cohesion ratings of English language learners’ written production","authors":"Xiaofei Lu, Renfen Hu","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000202","url":null,"abstract":"The use of connectives has been considered important for assessing the cohesion of written texts (Crossley et al., 2019). However, existing connective-based indices have not systematically addressed two issues of ambiguity, namely, that between discourse and non-discourse use of polysemous word forms and that in terms of the specific discourse relations marked by polysemous discourse connectives (Pitler & Nenkova, 2009). This study proposes 34 sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion that account for these issues and assesses their predictive power for cohesion ratings in comparison to 25 existing indices. Results from the analysis of 3,911 argumentative essays from the English Language Learner Insight, Proficiency and Skills Evaluation Corpus show that 23 sense-aware indices but only three existing indices correlated significantly and meaningfully with cohesion ratings. The sense-aware indices also exhibited greater predictive power for cohesion ratings than existing indices. The implications of our findings for future cohesion research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140196174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multilingualism and native speakerism in academic journals’ language policies: Exploring a potential power of applied linguistics journals in promoting equitable publishing practices 学术期刊语言政策中的多语言主义和母语主义:探索应用语言学期刊在促进公平出版实践中的潜在力量
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000068
Leiry K. Warren, Masatoshi Sato

Multilingualism in the context of academic publishing involves beliefs and actions manifested through publications in multiple languages. However, a systematic analysis of how academic journals practice multilingualism has been scant. Therefore, the present study analyzed how indexed journals of applied linguistics promote and practice multilingualism following their scopes and language policies (LPs). Initially, 67 journals underwent screening based on their “aims and scope,” resulting in 11 journals that actively promoted multilingualism. Employing a critical discourse analysis (CDA) framework, the main analysis focused on the assumptions embedded within the journals’ LPs. The findings indicated an incongruity between the journals’ stated commitment and their practices of multilingualism. Specifically, all the journals mandated submissions exclusively in English with implicit biases toward native speakerism. The study underscores the need for a collective effort within and beyond the applied linguistics community to address linguistic biases and for more equitable and inclusive academic publishing practices.

学术出版中的多语制涉及通过多语种出版物表现出来的信念和行动。然而,关于学术期刊如何实践多语制的系统分析却很少。因此,本研究分析了被收录的应用语言学期刊如何根据其范围和语言政策(LPs)促进和实践多语制。最初,根据 "目的和范围 "对 67 种期刊进行了筛选,最终确定了 11 种积极推广多语制的期刊。采用批判性话语分析(CDA)框架,主要分析了期刊语言政策中的假设。研究结果表明,期刊所宣称的承诺与多语制实践之间存在不一致。具体而言,所有期刊都规定只能用英语投稿,并隐含着对以英语为母语者的偏见。这项研究强调,应用语言学界内外需要共同努力,解决语言偏见问题,使学术出版实践更加公平、更具包容性。
{"title":"Multilingualism and native speakerism in academic journals’ language policies: Exploring a potential power of applied linguistics journals in promoting equitable publishing practices","authors":"Leiry K. Warren, Masatoshi Sato","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multilingualism in the context of academic publishing involves beliefs and actions manifested through publications in multiple languages. However, a systematic analysis of how academic journals practice multilingualism has been scant. Therefore, the present study analyzed how indexed journals of applied linguistics promote and practice multilingualism following their scopes and language policies (LPs). Initially, 67 journals underwent screening based on their “aims and scope,” resulting in 11 journals that actively promoted multilingualism. Employing a critical discourse analysis (CDA) framework, the main analysis focused on the assumptions embedded within the journals’ LPs. The findings indicated an incongruity between the journals’ stated commitment and their practices of multilingualism. Specifically, all the journals mandated submissions exclusively in English with implicit biases toward native speakerism. The study underscores the need for a collective effort within and beyond the applied linguistics community to address linguistic biases and for more equitable and inclusive academic publishing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140146130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
L2 learning outcomes of a research-based digital app for Japanese children 以研究为基础的日本儿童数字应用程序的第二语言学习成果
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000147
Hee Jin Bang, Eric Setoguchi, Alison Mackey, Akiko Fujii

Digital educational game-based apps can be effective in helping young children develop language skills, particularly when paired with formal instruction. However, we need to know more about how educational games benefit learning in the absence of formal instruction, given children’s proficiency with and willingness to use mobile devices anytime, anywhere. This study uses a randomized controlled trial design to investigate the impact of a digital app—ABCmouse English—on L2 learning of seven- and eight-year-old Japanese children over a 16-week period. Pre- and post-assessments of the children’s English proficiency, together with an analysis of when and how they played with the app, were used to shed light on the relationship between the children’s in-app game choices and their language learning outcomes. Surveys and interviews with parents provide qualitative insights and information about the experiences of children and their families while using the app and its impact on their development as language learners.

以数字教育游戏为基础的应用程序可以有效地帮助幼儿发展语言技能,尤其是在配合正规教学的情况下。然而,鉴于儿童随时随地使用移动设备的熟练程度和意愿,我们需要更多地了解教育游戏如何在没有正规教学的情况下促进学习。本研究采用随机对照试验设计,调查了一款数字应用程序--ABCmouse English 对七、八岁日本儿童为期 16 周的第二语言学习的影响。通过对儿童英语水平的前期和后期评估,以及对他们使用该应用程序的时间和方式的分析,揭示了儿童在应用程序中的游戏选择与他们的语言学习成果之间的关系。对家长的调查和访谈则提供了有关儿童及其家庭在使用应用程序时的经历及其对儿童作为语言学习者的发展所产生的影响的定性见解和信息。
{"title":"L2 learning outcomes of a research-based digital app for Japanese children","authors":"Hee Jin Bang, Eric Setoguchi, Alison Mackey, Akiko Fujii","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000147","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital educational game-based apps can be effective in helping young children develop language skills, particularly when paired with formal instruction. However, we need to know more about how educational games benefit learning in the absence of formal instruction, given children’s proficiency with and willingness to use mobile devices anytime, anywhere. This study uses a randomized controlled trial design to investigate the impact of a digital app—<span>ABCmouse English—</span>on L2 learning of seven- and eight-year-old Japanese children over a 16-week period. Pre- and post-assessments of the children’s English proficiency, together with an analysis of when and how they played with the app, were used to shed light on the relationship between the children’s in-app game choices and their language learning outcomes. Surveys and interviews with parents provide qualitative insights and information about the experiences of children and their families while using the app and its impact on their development as language learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140146204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Methods for IDs and TBLT: A Substantive and Methodological Review ID 和 TBLT 的研究方法:实质性和方法论综述
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000135
Lara Bryfonski, Yunjung (Yunie) Ku, Alison Mackey
As part of ongoing efforts to characterize the extent to which tasks and interaction-driven language learning are influenced by individual differences (IDs), task-based researchers have thus far examined variables like learners’ levels of L2 anxiety, motivation, cognitive creativity, working memory capacity, and aptitude. Building on a tradition of prior syntheses in task-based language teaching (TBLT, e.g., Plonsky & Kim, 2016), we carried out a methodological review of the practices used by researchers who have examined learners’ IDs in task-based language learning. We searched journal articles published between 2000 and 2023 and identified 135 unique samples for analysis. Each empirical study was coded for relevant contextual and demographic variables as well as for methodological features related to the investigation of individual differences. We observed that of 30 individual differences investigated in TBLT research over the last two decades, the top five most common were motivation, working memory, L2 proficiency, anxiety, and aptitude. Interesting patterns related to operationalizations, instruments, coding, analyses, and reporting practices. In this paper, we report these results and summarize the most and least common methodological practices, also pointing out gaps and possibilities for future directions. We conclude with recommendations for researchers interested in embarking on empirical investigations of individual differences and TBLT based on best practices.
目前,任务型语言教学的研究者们正在努力确定任务和互动驱动型语言学习受个体差异(IDs)影响的程度,在此过程中,他们对学习者的语言焦虑水平、学习动机、认知创造力、工作记忆能力和能力倾向等变量进行了研究。基于任务型语言教学(TBLT,如 Plonsky & Kim, 2016)的前期综述传统,我们对任务型语言学习中考察学习者 ID 的研究者所采用的方法进行了综述。我们搜索了 2000 年至 2023 年间发表的期刊论文,确定了 135 个独特的样本进行分析。我们对每项实证研究的相关背景和人口变量以及与个体差异调查相关的方法特征进行了编码。我们发现,在过去二十年的 TBLT 研究中,对 30 种个体差异进行了调查,其中最常见的前五种是动机、工作记忆、L2 熟练程度、焦虑和能力倾向。有趣的模式涉及操作、工具、编码、分析和报告实践。在本文中,我们报告了这些结果,并总结了最常见和最不常见的方法实践,同时也指出了差距和未来发展方向的可能性。最后,我们将根据最佳实践,为有兴趣对个体差异和 TBLT 开展实证调查的研究人员提出建议。
{"title":"Research Methods for IDs and TBLT: A Substantive and Methodological Review","authors":"Lara Bryfonski, Yunjung (Yunie) Ku, Alison Mackey","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000135","url":null,"abstract":"As part of ongoing efforts to characterize the extent to which tasks and interaction-driven language learning are influenced by individual differences (IDs), task-based researchers have thus far examined variables like learners’ levels of L2 anxiety, motivation, cognitive creativity, working memory capacity, and aptitude. Building on a tradition of prior syntheses in task-based language teaching (TBLT, e.g., Plonsky &amp; Kim, 2016), we carried out a methodological review of the practices used by researchers who have examined learners’ IDs in task-based language learning. We searched journal articles published between 2000 and 2023 and identified 135 unique samples for analysis. Each empirical study was coded for relevant contextual and demographic variables as well as for methodological features related to the investigation of individual differences. We observed that of 30 individual differences investigated in TBLT research over the last two decades, the top five most common were motivation, working memory, L2 proficiency, anxiety, and aptitude. Interesting patterns related to operationalizations, instruments, coding, analyses, and reporting practices. In this paper, we report these results and summarize the most and least common methodological practices, also pointing out gaps and possibilities for future directions. We conclude with recommendations for researchers interested in embarking on empirical investigations of individual differences and TBLT based on best practices.","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140142158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chatgpt in and for second language acquisition: a call for systematic research Chatgpt 在第二语言习得中的作用和对第二语言习得的作用:呼吁开展系统研究
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000111
ZhaoHong Han
{"title":"Chatgpt in and for second language acquisition: a call for systematic research","authors":"ZhaoHong Han","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000111","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140246998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do verbal and nonverbal declarative memory tasks in second language research measure the same abilities? 第二语言研究中的言语和非言语陈述性记忆任务测量的能力相同吗?
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000093
Phillip Hamrick, Christopher A. Was, Yin Zhang

A growing body of evidence demonstrates that individual differences in declarative memory may be an important predictor of second language (L2) abilities. However, the evidence comes from studies using different declarative memory tasks that vary in their reliance on verbal abilities and task demands, which preclude estimating the size of the relationship between declarative memory and L2 learning. To address these concerns, we examined the relationship between verbal and nonverbal declarative memory abilities within the same task while controlling for task demands and stimulus modality, to estimate the upper bound of the relationship between verbal and nonverbal declarative memory. Results indicate that when task demands and stimulus modality are controlled, verbal and nonverbal declarative memory abilities shared a medium-to-large amount of underlying variance. However, future studies should exercise caution in appraising associations between declarative memory abilities and L2 learning until a more precise understanding of the underlying mechanisms is achieved.

越来越多的证据表明,陈述性记忆的个体差异可能是预测第二语言(L2)能力的一个重要因素。然而,这些证据来自于使用不同的陈述性记忆任务进行的研究,这些任务对言语能力和任务要求的依赖程度各不相同,因此无法估计陈述性记忆与 L2 学习之间关系的大小。为了解决这些问题,我们在控制任务要求和刺激模式的同时,研究了同一任务中言语和非言语陈述性记忆能力之间的关系,以估计言语和非言语陈述性记忆之间关系的上限。结果表明,当任务要求和刺激模式受到控制时,言语和非言语陈述性记忆能力共享中到大量的潜在变异。然而,在更准确地了解其潜在机制之前,未来的研究在评估陈述性记忆能力与 L2 学习之间的关联时应谨慎行事。
{"title":"Do verbal and nonverbal declarative memory tasks in second language research measure the same abilities?","authors":"Phillip Hamrick, Christopher A. Was, Yin Zhang","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000093","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing body of evidence demonstrates that individual differences in declarative memory may be an important predictor of second language (L2) abilities. However, the evidence comes from studies using different declarative memory tasks that vary in their reliance on verbal abilities and task demands, which preclude estimating the size of the relationship between declarative memory and L2 learning. To address these concerns, we examined the relationship between verbal and nonverbal declarative memory abilities within the same task while controlling for task demands and stimulus modality, to estimate the upper bound of the relationship between verbal and nonverbal declarative memory. Results indicate that when task demands and stimulus modality are controlled, verbal and nonverbal declarative memory abilities shared a medium-to-large amount of underlying variance. However, future studies should exercise caution in appraising associations between declarative memory abilities and L2 learning until a more precise understanding of the underlying mechanisms is achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140096957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing the input for learning of L2-specific constructions: the roles of Zipfian and balanced input, explicit rules and working memory 优化 L2 特定结构学习的输入:Zipfian 和均衡输入、显性规则和工作记忆的作用
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000081
Manuel F. Pulido

Usage-based theory has proposed that learning of linguistic constructions is facilitated by input that contains few high-frequency exemplars, in what is known as a skewed (or Zipfian) input distribution. Early empirical work provided support to this idea, but subsequent L2 research has provided mixed findings. However, previous approaches have not explored the impact that cognitive traits (e.g., working memory) have on the effectiveness of skewed or balanced input. The experiment reported here tested learners’ ability to develop new L2 categories of adjectives that guide lexical selection in Spanish verbs of “becoming.” The results showed that, when explicit rules are provided, low-working memory learners benefitted from reduced variability in skewed input, while high-working memory individuals benefitted from balanced input, which better allows for rule-based hypothesis testing. The findings help clarify the mixed findings in previous studies and suggest a way forward for optimizing the L2 input based on individual traits.

基于用法的理论提出,输入中包含很少的高频示例,即所谓的倾斜(或 Zipfian)输入分布,有利于语言结构的学习。早期的实证研究为这一观点提供了支持,但随后的 L2 研究结果不一。然而,以前的研究方法并没有探讨认知特征(如工作记忆)对倾斜或平衡输入效果的影响。本文所报告的实验测试了学习者在西班牙语 "成为 "动词中发展新的第二语言形容词类别以指导词汇选择的能力。结果表明,在提供明确规则的情况下,低度工作记忆学习者能从减少偏斜输入的变异性中获益,而高度工作记忆个体则能从平衡输入中获益,因为平衡输入能更好地进行基于规则的假设检验。这些研究结果有助于澄清以往研究中存在的不同结论,并为根据个体特征优化 L2 输入提出了建议。
{"title":"Optimizing the input for learning of L2-specific constructions: the roles of Zipfian and balanced input, explicit rules and working memory","authors":"Manuel F. Pulido","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000081","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Usage-based theory has proposed that learning of linguistic constructions is facilitated by input that contains few high-frequency exemplars, in what is known as a skewed (or Zipfian) input distribution. Early empirical work provided support to this idea, but subsequent L2 research has provided mixed findings. However, previous approaches have not explored the impact that cognitive traits (e.g., working memory) have on the effectiveness of skewed or balanced input. The experiment reported here tested learners’ ability to develop new L2 categories of adjectives that guide lexical selection in Spanish verbs of “becoming.” The results showed that, when explicit rules are provided, low-working memory learners benefitted from reduced variability in skewed input, while high-working memory individuals benefitted from balanced input, which better allows for rule-based hypothesis testing. The findings help clarify the mixed findings in previous studies and suggest a way forward for optimizing the L2 input based on individual traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140043673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Announcing the 2024 Susan Gass Award for Impact in SLA 宣布 2024 年苏珊-加斯国际图书馆员协会影响力奖
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000160
{"title":"Announcing the 2024 Susan Gass Award for Impact in SLA","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140401720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2023 Valdman Award Acceptance Note 2023 年瓦尔德曼奖接受说明
IF 4.1 1区 文学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/s0272263124000159
{"title":"2023 Valdman Award Acceptance Note","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000159","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140407675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1