Hejia Chen, Xi Huang, Muhammad Tayyab, Mingming Zhao, Defu Yao, Zhihong Zheng, Xianliang Zhao, Yongzhen Zhao, Xiuli Chen, Bobo Zhang, Qiongqiong Yang, Yueling Zhang, Zhongyang Lin
Copper, an essential micronutrient in crustaceans, plays vital roles in enzymatic processes, oxygen transport, pigmentation, and structural protein synthesis, including collagen and elastin. Recent research has elucidated its pivotal role in innate immunity of crustaceans, enhancing the immune response by promoting phagocytic activity, antimicrobial peptide production, and modulation of immune gene expression. Copper ions exhibit antimicrobial effects by disrupting cell membranes and inhibiting microbial proliferation. Furthermore, copper governs antioxidant defense mechanisms, protecting crustaceans against oxidative stress and infection. However, excessive copper can lead to toxicity, highlighting the need for strict maintenance of copper homeostasis. This review explores the complex processes of copper homeostasis in crustaceans, detailing transport mechanisms, storage proteins, and detoxification pathways. It emphasizes copper's critical physiological and immunological functions, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of its multifaceted roles in crustaceans and laying groundwork for further exploration of copper homeostasis as a strategy for boosting crustacean immunity. Aquaculture practices significantly influence copper levels in crustaceans. Effective copper management, including monitoring techniques, water treatment strategies, and regulatory frameworks, is crucial for both crustacean welfare and environmental sustainability.
{"title":"Copper Homeostasis and Its Impact on Innate Immunity in Crustaceans","authors":"Hejia Chen, Xi Huang, Muhammad Tayyab, Mingming Zhao, Defu Yao, Zhihong Zheng, Xianliang Zhao, Yongzhen Zhao, Xiuli Chen, Bobo Zhang, Qiongqiong Yang, Yueling Zhang, Zhongyang Lin","doi":"10.1111/raq.12963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12963","url":null,"abstract":"Copper, an essential micronutrient in crustaceans, plays vital roles in enzymatic processes, oxygen transport, pigmentation, and structural protein synthesis, including collagen and elastin. Recent research has elucidated its pivotal role in innate immunity of crustaceans, enhancing the immune response by promoting phagocytic activity, antimicrobial peptide production, and modulation of immune gene expression. Copper ions exhibit antimicrobial effects by disrupting cell membranes and inhibiting microbial proliferation. Furthermore, copper governs antioxidant defense mechanisms, protecting crustaceans against oxidative stress and infection. However, excessive copper can lead to toxicity, highlighting the need for strict maintenance of copper homeostasis. This review explores the complex processes of copper homeostasis in crustaceans, detailing transport mechanisms, storage proteins, and detoxification pathways. It emphasizes copper's critical physiological and immunological functions, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of its multifaceted roles in crustaceans and laying groundwork for further exploration of copper homeostasis as a strategy for boosting crustacean immunity. Aquaculture practices significantly influence copper levels in crustaceans. Effective copper management, including monitoring techniques, water treatment strategies, and regulatory frameworks, is crucial for both crustacean welfare and environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cell death mechanisms in crustaceans are a complex interplay of processes essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and immune defense. Modes of cell death like apoptosis, necroptosis, and necrosis are well-documented in crustaceans, serving crucial roles in removing damaged or infected cells. Unlike in other organisms, crustaceans likely lack pyroptosis, a type of programmed cell death associated with innate immunity and inflammation, because they do not possess the gasdermin genes essential for this process. Recently, NETosis and ferroptosis have emerged as significant mechanisms in pathogen defense. NETosis, involving the release of DNA fibers and antimicrobial proteins, helps trap and neutralize pathogens, while ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death, contributes to lipid peroxidation and immune responses. Cuproptosis, although not yet studied in the context of crustacean immunity, shows potential crosstalk with ferroptosis, particularly in the regulation of metal ion homeostasis, oxidative stress, and cellular metabolism. Understanding these mechanisms offers promising applications in aquaculture, such as developing targeted immune modulators and enhancing disease resistance in economically important crustacean species.
{"title":"Cell Death in Crustacean Immune Defense","authors":"Zeyan Chen, Muhammad Tayyab, Defu Yao, Jude Juventus Aweya, Zhihong Zheng, Xianliang Zhao, Zhongyang Lin, Yueling Zhang","doi":"10.1111/raq.12976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12976","url":null,"abstract":"Cell death mechanisms in crustaceans are a complex interplay of processes essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and immune defense. Modes of cell death like apoptosis, necroptosis, and necrosis are well-documented in crustaceans, serving crucial roles in removing damaged or infected cells. Unlike in other organisms, crustaceans likely lack pyroptosis, a type of programmed cell death associated with innate immunity and inflammation, because they do not possess the gasdermin genes essential for this process. Recently, NETosis and ferroptosis have emerged as significant mechanisms in pathogen defense. NETosis, involving the release of DNA fibers and antimicrobial proteins, helps trap and neutralize pathogens, while ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death, contributes to lipid peroxidation and immune responses. Cuproptosis, although not yet studied in the context of crustacean immunity, shows potential crosstalk with ferroptosis, particularly in the regulation of metal ion homeostasis, oxidative stress, and cellular metabolism. Understanding these mechanisms offers promising applications in aquaculture, such as developing targeted immune modulators and enhancing disease resistance in economically important crustacean species.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142171403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Qizhi Liu, Shi Wang, Chenchen Tang, Min Tao, Chun Zhang, Yi Zhou, Qinbo Qin, Kaikun Luo, Chang Wu, Fangzhou Hu, Yude Wang, Qingfeng Liu, Wuhui Li, Jing Wang, Rurong Zhao, Shaojun Liu
Distant hybridization and gynogenesis are two prevalent breeding techniques for fishes. Drawing from the research achievements of our team and the existing literature, we summarize the reproductive traits and genetic features of fishes derived from distant hybridizations and gynogenesis, and we deduce the fundamental mechanisms of these two methods and compare them, discerning their common and different characteristics. Both distant hybridization and gynogenesis techniques can alter genotypes and phenotypes, thus establishing them as significant breeding methods. Additionally, the genetic principles and the basic biological characteristics of distant hybridization and gynogenesis in fish have been inferred. We propose the concepts of macro‐hybrid and micro‐hybrid based on extensive experimental findings from fish distant hybridizations and gynogenesis. The term “macro‐hybrid” refers to offspring from distant hybridization that possess two distinct subgenomes, each inherited from one of the two parental species, such as allodiploid and allotetraploid lineages. The concept of “micro‐hybrid” refers to offspring, including autodiploid and autotetraploid lineages, as well as those resulting from artificial gynogenesis, whose genome almost originates solely from the maternal parent but in which certain DNA fragments derived from the paternal parent insert. Distant hybridization and gynogenesis are vital techniques in fish genetics, breeding, and evolution. We highlight the prospective paths for research and application of distant hybridization and gynogenesis in fishes.
远缘杂交和雌核发育是鱼类育种的两种常用技术。我们结合本团队的研究成果和现有文献,总结了远缘杂交和雌核发育所产生的鱼类繁殖性状和遗传特征,推导了这两种方法的基本机制,并对它们进行了比较,找出了它们的共同点和不同点。远缘杂交和雌核发育技术都能改变基因型和表型,因而是重要的育种方法。此外,我们还推断了鱼类远缘杂交和雌核发育的遗传原理和基本生物学特征。根据鱼类远缘杂交和雌核发育的大量实验结果,我们提出了宏杂交和微杂交的概念。所谓 "大杂交",是指远缘杂交的后代具有两个不同的亚基因组,每个亚基因组遗传自两个亲本中的一个,如异源二倍体和异源四倍体系。微杂交 "的概念是指后代,包括自二倍体和自四倍体系,以及人工雌核发育产生的后代,其基因组几乎完全来自母本,但其中插入了父本的某些 DNA 片段。远缘杂交和雌核发育是鱼类遗传学、育种和进化的重要技术。我们重点介绍了鱼类远缘杂交和雌核发育的研究和应用前景。
{"title":"The Research Advances in Distant Hybridization and Gynogenesis in Fish","authors":"Qizhi Liu, Shi Wang, Chenchen Tang, Min Tao, Chun Zhang, Yi Zhou, Qinbo Qin, Kaikun Luo, Chang Wu, Fangzhou Hu, Yude Wang, Qingfeng Liu, Wuhui Li, Jing Wang, Rurong Zhao, Shaojun Liu","doi":"10.1111/raq.12972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12972","url":null,"abstract":"Distant hybridization and gynogenesis are two prevalent breeding techniques for fishes. Drawing from the research achievements of our team and the existing literature, we summarize the reproductive traits and genetic features of fishes derived from distant hybridizations and gynogenesis, and we deduce the fundamental mechanisms of these two methods and compare them, discerning their common and different characteristics. Both distant hybridization and gynogenesis techniques can alter genotypes and phenotypes, thus establishing them as significant breeding methods. Additionally, the genetic principles and the basic biological characteristics of distant hybridization and gynogenesis in fish have been inferred. We propose the concepts of macro‐hybrid and micro‐hybrid based on extensive experimental findings from fish distant hybridizations and gynogenesis. The term “macro‐hybrid” refers to offspring from distant hybridization that possess two distinct subgenomes, each inherited from one of the two parental species, such as allodiploid and allotetraploid lineages. The concept of “micro‐hybrid” refers to offspring, including autodiploid and autotetraploid lineages, as well as those resulting from artificial gynogenesis, whose genome almost originates solely from the maternal parent but in which certain DNA fragments derived from the paternal parent insert. Distant hybridization and gynogenesis are vital techniques in fish genetics, breeding, and evolution. We highlight the prospective paths for research and application of distant hybridization and gynogenesis in fishes.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142166365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Global aquaculture production has been rising for several decades, with up to 76% of the total production from fish. However, the problem of fish diseases is becoming more and more prominent in today's context of pursuing sustainable aquaculture. Since the first fish genome assembly reported in 2002, genomic approaches have been successfully implemented in fish breeding to enhance disease resistance and reduce economic losses caused by diverse fish diseases. Here, we present a review of the current progress in fish genomics and its application in disease‐resistance breeding. First, assembly data for all publicly available fish genomes were curated and statistical analysis of these data were performed. Subsequently, genomics‐assisted breeding approaches (including quantitative trait loci mapping, genome‐wide association study, marker‐assisted selection, genomic selection, gene transfer, and genome editing) that have been applied in practical disease–resistance breeding programs are outlined. In addition, candidate genetic markers that could possibly be utilized in breeding were summarized. Finally, remaining challenges and further directions were discussed. In summary, this review provides insight into fish genomics and genomics‐assisted breeding of disease‐resistant fish varieties.
{"title":"Fish Genomics and Its Application in Disease‐Resistance Breeding","authors":"Yu Huang, Zeyu Li, Mengcheng Li, Xinhui Zhang, Qiong Shi, Zhen Xu","doi":"10.1111/raq.12973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12973","url":null,"abstract":"Global aquaculture production has been rising for several decades, with up to 76% of the total production from fish. However, the problem of fish diseases is becoming more and more prominent in today's context of pursuing sustainable aquaculture. Since the first fish genome assembly reported in 2002, genomic approaches have been successfully implemented in fish breeding to enhance disease resistance and reduce economic losses caused by diverse fish diseases. Here, we present a review of the current progress in fish genomics and its application in disease‐resistance breeding. First, assembly data for all publicly available fish genomes were curated and statistical analysis of these data were performed. Subsequently, genomics‐assisted breeding approaches (including quantitative trait loci mapping, genome‐wide association study, marker‐assisted selection, genomic selection, gene transfer, and genome editing) that have been applied in practical disease–resistance breeding programs are outlined. In addition, candidate genetic markers that could possibly be utilized in breeding were summarized. Finally, remaining challenges and further directions were discussed. In summary, this review provides insight into fish genomics and genomics‐assisted breeding of disease‐resistant fish varieties.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142166364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The health and well-being of all people—<i>including all those persons reading this editorial</i>—depends by a very large extent upon the nutrient content of their diet or food that they regularly consume. It is not surprising therefore that nutrition-related disorders still remain the number one preventable health challenge facing all countries globally: over 735 million people suffering from hunger and under-nutrition in 2022, and over-nutrition and obesity, and resulting metabolic disorders such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and hypertension, resulting from the increased consumption of fast foods and processed meat products, affecting over 890 million adults in 2022 [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Notwithstanding the above global crisis, aquatic food products, whether derived from aquaculture or wild capture fisheries, offer a much healthier alternative to fast foods, highly processed foods and terrestrial meats [<span>2</span>]. Aquatic foods include freshwater and marine fish, crustaceans, molluscs, and several other invertebrate species, such as sea urchins, sea cucumbers, sea squirts, marine worms, as well as aquatic plants, seaweeds, and algae. According to the latest statistical information from the FAO, total global aquaculture production in 2022 reached a new high of 130.92 million tonnes (Mt, live weight) and was valued at $312.75 billion, with the total global production increasing at a compound annual growth rate of 5.19% per year since 2000. By contrast, landings from capture fisheries have remained relatively static since 2000, decreasing from 94.78 Mt in 2000 to 92.29 Mt in 2022, with total global production from aquaculture and capture fishery landings increasing to a new high of 223.21 Mt in 2022 [<span>3</span>]. Seafood currently contributes 14.79% of total animal protein consumed globally; however, great variety of contribution is notable across countries and continents, with values higher than 20% in Asia and about 5% in North and South American countries (Table 1) [<span>4</span>]. Increased consumption of aquatic foods (blue foods) is commonly advocated from various viewpoints and considerations, including environmental as well as health-related factors [<span>5</span>].</p><p>In fact, in contrast to traditional capture fisheries, aquaculture offers a series of added advantages, including the ability to significantly increase global fish and seafood production and market availability, reducing harvesting pressure on wild stocks, and thus potentially benefiting biodiversity, and, in the case of fed-aquaculture fish and crustacean species, the unique and so far not fully utilized potential to tailor the nutrient profile of the target species to the consumer, through feed ingredient selection and sustainable feed use. By doing so, aquaculture can maximize the potential health value and benefit of farmed aquatic food products to the consumer.</p><p>With this in mind, we believe there is significant value in exploring new res
{"title":"Healthy Diets and Global Aquatic Food Production","authors":"Albert G. J. Tacon, Giovanni M. Turchini","doi":"10.1111/raq.12965","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12965","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The health and well-being of all people—<i>including all those persons reading this editorial</i>—depends by a very large extent upon the nutrient content of their diet or food that they regularly consume. It is not surprising therefore that nutrition-related disorders still remain the number one preventable health challenge facing all countries globally: over 735 million people suffering from hunger and under-nutrition in 2022, and over-nutrition and obesity, and resulting metabolic disorders such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and hypertension, resulting from the increased consumption of fast foods and processed meat products, affecting over 890 million adults in 2022 [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Notwithstanding the above global crisis, aquatic food products, whether derived from aquaculture or wild capture fisheries, offer a much healthier alternative to fast foods, highly processed foods and terrestrial meats [<span>2</span>]. Aquatic foods include freshwater and marine fish, crustaceans, molluscs, and several other invertebrate species, such as sea urchins, sea cucumbers, sea squirts, marine worms, as well as aquatic plants, seaweeds, and algae. According to the latest statistical information from the FAO, total global aquaculture production in 2022 reached a new high of 130.92 million tonnes (Mt, live weight) and was valued at $312.75 billion, with the total global production increasing at a compound annual growth rate of 5.19% per year since 2000. By contrast, landings from capture fisheries have remained relatively static since 2000, decreasing from 94.78 Mt in 2000 to 92.29 Mt in 2022, with total global production from aquaculture and capture fishery landings increasing to a new high of 223.21 Mt in 2022 [<span>3</span>]. Seafood currently contributes 14.79% of total animal protein consumed globally; however, great variety of contribution is notable across countries and continents, with values higher than 20% in Asia and about 5% in North and South American countries (Table 1) [<span>4</span>]. Increased consumption of aquatic foods (blue foods) is commonly advocated from various viewpoints and considerations, including environmental as well as health-related factors [<span>5</span>].</p><p>In fact, in contrast to traditional capture fisheries, aquaculture offers a series of added advantages, including the ability to significantly increase global fish and seafood production and market availability, reducing harvesting pressure on wild stocks, and thus potentially benefiting biodiversity, and, in the case of fed-aquaculture fish and crustacean species, the unique and so far not fully utilized potential to tailor the nutrient profile of the target species to the consumer, through feed ingredient selection and sustainable feed use. By doing so, aquaculture can maximize the potential health value and benefit of farmed aquatic food products to the consumer.</p><p>With this in mind, we believe there is significant value in exploring new res","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 4","pages":"1461-1462"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12965","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142161044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nikolas Panteli, Katerina Kousoulaki, Efthimia Antonopoulou, Chris G. Carter, Ioannis Nengas, Morgane Henry, Ioannis T. Karapanagiotidis, Elena Mente
The immense production of fishmeal and fish oil is dramatically intensifying the severe state of pelagic fisheries overexploitation. The latter in conjunction with the increasing demand for low-cost protein-rich food supply prompt aquaculture to employ new practice. Several novel dietary ingredients are currently under evaluation for potential incorporation in aquafeeds in an effort to shift the aquaculture sector toward a more sustainable and economic production. The present review aims to summarize the existing findings regarding the effects of studied alternatives to fishmeal and fish oil on the most valuable and commercially produced marine (Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax) and freshwater (Salmo salar and Oncorhynchus mykiss) finfish species in European aquaculture. Alternative protein sources, including macroalage (marine plants), krill (marine fishery), insects (terrestrial), terrestrial animal by-products (processed/rendered), and single cell ingredient (biotechnology), are discussed for their efficiency in promoting the growth and the welfare of both fry and adult cultured finfish species. Applicability of these ingredients is reviewed in terms of nutrient composition, dietary inclusion level, performance output, digestibility, and health benefits. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted based on data from peer-reviewed scientific publications in order to assess whether novel ingredients meet the dietary protein (amino acid) and lipid requirements of finfishes. Aquafeed reformulation strategies should ensure the recommended daily nutritional requirements and additionally indicate the meta-analysis alternatives, such as microalgae, which are deficient in essential amino acids. The sustainable expansion of aquaculture is on the horizon, but which novel ingredients may be regarded as the key drivers to its establishment?
{"title":"Which Novel Ingredient Should be Considered the “Holy Grail” for Sustainable Production of Finfish Aquafeeds?","authors":"Nikolas Panteli, Katerina Kousoulaki, Efthimia Antonopoulou, Chris G. Carter, Ioannis Nengas, Morgane Henry, Ioannis T. Karapanagiotidis, Elena Mente","doi":"10.1111/raq.12969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12969","url":null,"abstract":"The immense production of fishmeal and fish oil is dramatically intensifying the severe state of pelagic fisheries overexploitation. The latter in conjunction with the increasing demand for low-cost protein-rich food supply prompt aquaculture to employ new practice. Several novel dietary ingredients are currently under evaluation for potential incorporation in aquafeeds in an effort to shift the aquaculture sector toward a more sustainable and economic production. The present review aims to summarize the existing findings regarding the effects of studied alternatives to fishmeal and fish oil on the most valuable and commercially produced marine (<i>Sparus aurata</i> and <i>Dicentrarchus labrax</i>) and freshwater (<i>Salmo salar</i> and <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) finfish species in European aquaculture. Alternative protein sources, including macroalage (marine plants), krill (marine fishery), insects (terrestrial), terrestrial animal by-products (processed/rendered), and single cell ingredient (biotechnology), are discussed for their efficiency in promoting the growth and the welfare of both fry and adult cultured finfish species. Applicability of these ingredients is reviewed in terms of nutrient composition, dietary inclusion level, performance output, digestibility, and health benefits. In addition, a meta-analysis was conducted based on data from peer-reviewed scientific publications in order to assess whether novel ingredients meet the dietary protein (amino acid) and lipid requirements of finfishes. Aquafeed reformulation strategies should ensure the recommended daily nutritional requirements and additionally indicate the meta-analysis alternatives, such as microalgae, which are deficient in essential amino acids. The sustainable expansion of aquaculture is on the horizon, but which novel ingredients may be regarded as the key drivers to its establishment?","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"382 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142159024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}