Krishna P. Singha, Narottam P. Sahu, Parimal Sardar, Naseemashahul Shamna, Vikas Kumar
Carbohydrates serve as essential macronutrients in aquaculture feeds, providing cost-efficiency and numerous advantages, including energy supply, pellet stability, reduced ammonia excretion, and support for exoskeleton synthesis in crustaceans. Despite their significance, research on carbohydrate nutrition in crustaceans has been relatively limited compared to finfish. This comprehensive review addresses this knowledge gap by presenting contemporary insights into carbohydrate utilization in commercially important crustacean species, encompassing shrimps, prawns, crabs, lobsters, and crayfishes. The review underscores the pivotal role of carbohydrates, identifies limiting factors, and outlines strategies for enhancing efficiency. Wheat and sorghum/milo emerge as particularly promising carbohydrate sources. Nevertheless, determining species-specific carbohydrate inclusion levels remains essential for further investigation. This review also emphasizes species-specific distinctions in carbohydrate utilization during starvation, influenced by factors such as age, moulting stage, and digestive capacity. Challenging the misconception that carbohydrates are superfluous for crustaceans is imperative. Additional research to advance comprehension of their utilization mechanisms is vital. Enhanced knowledge of carbohydrate utilization can pave the way for economically sustainable and environmentally friendly feeds in crustacean aquaculture. Furthermore, exploring exogenous enzyme potential, optimizing pre-treatment methodologies, and harnessing probiotics can further augment carbohydrate utilization. These advancements hold promise for bolstering the growth and sustainability of the crustacean industry, meeting the surging demand for seafood production while minimizing environmental impact.
{"title":"A strategic roadmap for carbohydrate utilization in crustaceans feed","authors":"Krishna P. Singha, Narottam P. Sahu, Parimal Sardar, Naseemashahul Shamna, Vikas Kumar","doi":"10.1111/raq.12861","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12861","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbohydrates serve as essential macronutrients in aquaculture feeds, providing cost-efficiency and numerous advantages, including energy supply, pellet stability, reduced ammonia excretion, and support for exoskeleton synthesis in crustaceans. Despite their significance, research on carbohydrate nutrition in crustaceans has been relatively limited compared to finfish. This comprehensive review addresses this knowledge gap by presenting contemporary insights into carbohydrate utilization in commercially important crustacean species, encompassing shrimps, prawns, crabs, lobsters, and crayfishes. The review underscores the pivotal role of carbohydrates, identifies limiting factors, and outlines strategies for enhancing efficiency. Wheat and sorghum/milo emerge as particularly promising carbohydrate sources. Nevertheless, determining species-specific carbohydrate inclusion levels remains essential for further investigation. This review also emphasizes species-specific distinctions in carbohydrate utilization during starvation, influenced by factors such as age, moulting stage, and digestive capacity. Challenging the misconception that carbohydrates are superfluous for crustaceans is imperative. Additional research to advance comprehension of their utilization mechanisms is vital. Enhanced knowledge of carbohydrate utilization can pave the way for economically sustainable and environmentally friendly feeds in crustacean aquaculture. Furthermore, exploring exogenous enzyme potential, optimizing pre-treatment methodologies, and harnessing probiotics can further augment carbohydrate utilization. These advancements hold promise for bolstering the growth and sustainability of the crustacean industry, meeting the surging demand for seafood production while minimizing environmental impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 2","pages":"674-705"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71507944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>According to the FAO statistics, the output of world aquatic products reached 177.8 million tons in 2020, of which the fishing and aquaculture marine products accounted for 63%.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As the wild fisheries have almost reached their maximum sustainable level, marine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services. However, sustainable marine aquaculture needs systemic planning and management to efficiently deal with a number of serious challenges, such as environmental pollution, feed exploitation and disease control. In this issue of <i>Reviews in Aquaculture</i>, there are some timely articles focusing on these hot issues.</p><p>The first of these, a Sena De Silva paper by Falconer et al,<span><sup>2</sup></span> emphasizes the importance of planning, licensing and governance to marine aquaculture. As marine aquaculture covers a diverse range of species and spreads to different locations throughout the world, the production technologies, farm management strategies, and the environmental, economic and social impacts are also different. Some countries have specific legislation, while in others, aquaculture is governed under broader laws (e.g., environmental management). In this article, United Kingdom is used as a detailed case study to show the challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. ‘Planning and licensing’ is not a single issue and involves a wide range of interacting interdisciplinary considerations, so frameworks need to be fluid, versatile and adaptive. Meanwhile, the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision support tools are also addressed in this article. Marine spatial planning is promoted as a way of planning and managing different resource users to minimize conflict. Geographic information systems and spatial modelling can be used to find suitable locations that fit the specified criteria. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so sharing the experiences as well as efficient ways to overcome these challenges is important to ensure sustainable marine aquaculture in the 21st century.</p><p>As a case evidence, another article in this issue summarizes the transitions and challenges in China's abalone culture industry over the past 60 years.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Even though China is the leading global abalone producer, many problems like a reduction in nearshore space, natural disasters, high temperatures and low oxygen levels in the sea have accompanied the rapid development of this industry. In recent years, big data technology has been initially used in China's aquaculture industry and access to big data for aquaculture is even more automated by the internet of things. These innovative facilities and technologies are steering the abalone aquaculture industry towards a technology-driven high-quality development path, and further contribute to accompl
据联合国粮农组织统计,2020年世界水产品产量达到1.778亿吨,其中渔业和水产养殖海产品占63% 1由于野生渔业几乎已达到其最大可持续水平,海洋水产养殖有可能增加其对全球粮食系统的贡献并提供宝贵的生态系统服务。然而,可持续海洋水产养殖需要系统的规划和管理,以有效应对环境污染、饲料开发和疾病控制等一系列严峻挑战。本期《水产养殖评论》对这些热点问题进行了及时的探讨。Falconer等人在Sena De Silva发表的第一篇论文强调了规划、许可和管理对海洋水产养殖的重要性。由于海洋水产养殖涵盖多种物种,并向世界各地扩散,其生产技术、养殖场管理策略以及环境、经济和社会影响也各不相同。有些国家有具体的立法,而在其他国家,水产养殖受更广泛的法律(例如环境管理)管辖。在本文中,英国作为一个详细的案例研究,展示了行业、监管机构和政策制定者在相互作用的司法管辖区面临的挑战和不确定性。“规划和许可”不是一个单一的问题,它涉及到广泛的相互作用的跨学科考虑,因此框架需要是流动的、通用的和适应性的。同时,本文还讨论了解决知识差距和使用决策支持工具的必要性。海洋空间规划是一种规划和管理不同资源使用者的方式,以尽量减少冲突。地理信息系统和空间模型可以用来找到符合指定标准的合适位置。规划和许可可能非常复杂,因此分享经验以及克服这些挑战的有效方法对于确保21世纪可持续的海洋水产养殖非常重要。作为案例证据,本期的另一篇文章总结了过去60年来中国鲍鱼文化产业的转型与挑战尽管中国是全球领先的鲍鱼生产国,但许多问题,如近岸空间减少,自然灾害,海洋高温和低氧水平,伴随着该行业的快速发展。近年来,大数据技术在中国水产养殖行业得到了初步应用,通过物联网,水产养殖大数据的获取更加自动化。这些创新的设施和技术正在引导鲍鱼养殖业走向技术驱动的高质量发展道路,并进一步为实现“碳中和”目标做出贡献。另外两个案例分别是海藻养殖和海虱控制,在本期中也突出了海洋养殖综合规划和管理的必要性。4.5传统的海藻养殖主要在近岸、避风或半避风水域进行。然而,这些区域是有限的,而且经常存在争议,为了满足未来的需求,生产必须转移到“非传统”地区和争议较少的近海。在海藻养殖的综述文章中,作者概述了三种澳大利亚主要海藻的养殖技术及其对近海条件的适应性这篇综述文章将为研究和开发计划提供信息,以促进南澳大利亚和全球近海海藻养殖。海虱已成为全球水产养殖的严重威胁,特别是在海洋鲑科水产养殖中,本期的一篇综述论文讨论了智利鲑鱼养殖中海虱控制的出现。这篇文章说明了控制海虱所采取的管理行动,并研究了如何将海虱的健康管理纳入更广泛的鲑科健康管理。由于海虱的地理和海洋学特征影响着海虱的丰度,因此海虱的控制管理应在多学科研究和实践的支持下进行设计和实施。本文介绍了智利海虱控制或预防的一些方法,并提出了一些危险因素,以引起更多的关注。水产养殖业被金融机构认为是高风险行业,主要是由于动物流行病、自然灾害以及规划和监测不力造成的失败。在本期中,一篇综述论文强调了在水产养殖中应用生物经济模型的重要性和必要性,以规划、监测和确定成本效益和风险,减少不确定性并增加利润。 生物经济建模是社会科学的一个进步分支,它寻求将经济学和生物学学科结合起来,创造出能够利用生物学基础更好地解释经济事件的理论。水产养殖的生物经济模型实际上始于20世纪80年代。然而,作者使用荟萃分析分析了过去26年(1994-2020年)生物经济模型在水产养殖中的应用,发现该模型的使用正在减少,特别是在海洋水产养殖中。此外,作者提出,生物经济模型的优势在生产者、计划者和金融机构之间的传播程度较低,以及缺乏分析软件,是限制生物经济模型在水产养殖中应用的因素。考虑到海洋环境比淡水环境更为复杂,海洋水产养殖面临着许多现实威胁,需要更多的多学科研究。本刊发表的几篇文章强调了在新技术应用的支持下,对海洋水产养殖进行全面规划和管理的重要性。这有助于防止对生物健康、海洋环境和海产品安全的负面影响,提高养殖效率。这些文章不仅系统地回顾了目前政府和科学家在海洋水产养殖方面的知识和观点,而且提供了一些有价值的案例和实际操作。为政府和学术界进行海洋水产养殖规划和管理提供了有益的参考。
{"title":"Marine aquaculture: A developing domain needing thorough planning, management and novel technological supports","authors":"Yuan Luo, Fang Qiao, Mei-Ling Zhang, Zhen-Yu Du","doi":"10.1111/raq.12851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12851","url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to the FAO statistics, the output of world aquatic products reached 177.8 million tons in 2020, of which the fishing and aquaculture marine products accounted for 63%.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As the wild fisheries have almost reached their maximum sustainable level, marine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services. However, sustainable marine aquaculture needs systemic planning and management to efficiently deal with a number of serious challenges, such as environmental pollution, feed exploitation and disease control. In this issue of <i>Reviews in Aquaculture</i>, there are some timely articles focusing on these hot issues.</p><p>The first of these, a Sena De Silva paper by Falconer et al,<span><sup>2</sup></span> emphasizes the importance of planning, licensing and governance to marine aquaculture. As marine aquaculture covers a diverse range of species and spreads to different locations throughout the world, the production technologies, farm management strategies, and the environmental, economic and social impacts are also different. Some countries have specific legislation, while in others, aquaculture is governed under broader laws (e.g., environmental management). In this article, United Kingdom is used as a detailed case study to show the challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. ‘Planning and licensing’ is not a single issue and involves a wide range of interacting interdisciplinary considerations, so frameworks need to be fluid, versatile and adaptive. Meanwhile, the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision support tools are also addressed in this article. Marine spatial planning is promoted as a way of planning and managing different resource users to minimize conflict. Geographic information systems and spatial modelling can be used to find suitable locations that fit the specified criteria. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so sharing the experiences as well as efficient ways to overcome these challenges is important to ensure sustainable marine aquaculture in the 21st century.</p><p>As a case evidence, another article in this issue summarizes the transitions and challenges in China's abalone culture industry over the past 60 years.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Even though China is the leading global abalone producer, many problems like a reduction in nearshore space, natural disasters, high temperatures and low oxygen levels in the sea have accompanied the rapid development of this industry. In recent years, big data technology has been initially used in China's aquaculture industry and access to big data for aquaculture is even more automated by the internet of things. These innovative facilities and technologies are steering the abalone aquaculture industry towards a technology-driven high-quality development path, and further contribute to accompl","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"15 4","pages":"1258-1259"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12851","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24849951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Killian Chary, Anne-Jo van Riel, Abigail Muscat, Aurélie Wilfart, Souhil Harchaoui, Marc Verdegem, Ramón Filgueira, Max Troell, Patrik J. G. Henriksson, Imke J. M. de Boer, Geert F. Wiegertjes
A circular economy is considered one way to reduce environmental impacts of human activities, by more efficient use of resources and recovery, resulting in less waste and emissions compared to linear take-make-dispose systems. Muscat et al. developed five ecological principles to guide biomass use towards a circular economy. A few studies have demonstrated environmental benefits of applying these principles to land-based food systems, but to date, these principles have not been explored in aquaculture. The current study expands on these principles and provides a narrative review to (i) translate them to aquaculture, while identifying implications for the main species and production systems, and (ii) identify the main pathways to make aquaculture more circular. We show that the underlying concepts of the ‘safeguard’, ‘entropy’, and ‘recycle’ principles have been well researched and sometimes well implemented. In contrast, the ‘avoid’ and ‘prioritise’ principles have been explored much less; doing so would provide an opportunity to decrease environmental impacts of aquaculture at the food-system level. One example is prioritising the production of species that contribute to food and nutrition security, have low environmental impacts and thinking at wider food system scale to avoid feed-food competition in aquaculture. We identified six priorities that could make aquaculture more circular: (i) increase production and demand for the most essential species, (ii) decrease food loss and waste at farm and post-harvest stages, (iii) support nutrient recycling practices at multiple scales, (iv) adapt aquafeed formulations, (v) inform consumers about benefits of species of low trophic levels and other environmentally friendly aquatic foods, and (vi) address urgent research gaps.
{"title":"Transforming sustainable aquaculture by applying circularity principles","authors":"Killian Chary, Anne-Jo van Riel, Abigail Muscat, Aurélie Wilfart, Souhil Harchaoui, Marc Verdegem, Ramón Filgueira, Max Troell, Patrik J. G. Henriksson, Imke J. M. de Boer, Geert F. Wiegertjes","doi":"10.1111/raq.12860","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12860","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A circular economy is considered one way to reduce environmental impacts of human activities, by more efficient use of resources and recovery, resulting in less waste and emissions compared to linear take-make-dispose systems. Muscat et al. developed five ecological principles to guide biomass use towards a circular economy. A few studies have demonstrated environmental benefits of applying these principles to land-based food systems, but to date, these principles have not been explored in aquaculture. The current study expands on these principles and provides a narrative review to (i) translate them to aquaculture, while identifying implications for the main species and production systems, and (ii) identify the main pathways to make aquaculture more circular. We show that the underlying concepts of the ‘safeguard’, ‘entropy’, and ‘recycle’ principles have been well researched and sometimes well implemented. In contrast, the ‘avoid’ and ‘prioritise’ principles have been explored much less; doing so would provide an opportunity to decrease environmental impacts of aquaculture at the food-system level. One example is prioritising the production of species that contribute to food and nutrition security, have low environmental impacts and thinking at wider food system scale to avoid feed-food competition in aquaculture. We identified six priorities that could make aquaculture more circular: (i) increase production and demand for the most essential species, (ii) decrease food loss and waste at farm and post-harvest stages, (iii) support nutrient recycling practices at multiple scales, (iv) adapt aquafeed formulations, (v) inform consumers about benefits of species of low trophic levels and other environmentally friendly aquatic foods, and (vi) address urgent research gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 2","pages":"656-673"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12860","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135488174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
George Rigos, Francesc Padrós, Eleni Golomazou, Carlos Zarza
Parasitic infections can be occasionally severe in the European marine aquaculture industry, including the Mediterranean region, as they can incur considerable financial losses. Due to the lack of commercial vaccines, therapeutic approaches seem the only measure to battle parasitic outbreaks. Integrated strategies and increased resilience of the hosts, may limit to some degree the level of infestation. Ectoparasitic therapy is traditionally based on baths, with few exceptions. Several antiparasitic compounds have been registered in European aquatic medicine to combat mainly salmon sea lice; however, few of them are readily used against Mediterranean fish parasites. Formalin and less commonly hydrogen peroxide baths are applied against ectoparasites in the Mediterranean region. Most of the registered anti-lice antiparasitics have limited potential perhaps due to their adverse environmental impact. Future therapies against fish parasites will rely mainly on effective substances ensuring consumer, animal, and environmental welfare. Ideally, dietary antiparasitics such as praziquantel exhibiting mild environmental impact and high efficacy against a wide range of pathogens should be adopted. Moreover, combined strategies such as integrated pest management, involving various management practices with limited use of chemicals, should be a priority for specific parasitic outbreaks. The information presented in this review can guide future research and promote effective and prudent parasite control practices for Mediterranean-farmed fish.
{"title":"Antiparasitic approaches and strategies in European aquaculture, with emphasis on Mediterranean marine finfish farming: Present scenarios and future visions","authors":"George Rigos, Francesc Padrós, Eleni Golomazou, Carlos Zarza","doi":"10.1111/raq.12857","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12857","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parasitic infections can be occasionally severe in the European marine aquaculture industry, including the Mediterranean region, as they can incur considerable financial losses. Due to the lack of commercial vaccines, therapeutic approaches seem the only measure to battle parasitic outbreaks. Integrated strategies and increased resilience of the hosts, may limit to some degree the level of infestation. Ectoparasitic therapy is traditionally based on baths, with few exceptions. Several antiparasitic compounds have been registered in European aquatic medicine to combat mainly salmon sea lice; however, few of them are readily used against Mediterranean fish parasites. Formalin and less commonly hydrogen peroxide baths are applied against ectoparasites in the Mediterranean region. Most of the registered anti-lice antiparasitics have limited potential perhaps due to their adverse environmental impact. Future therapies against fish parasites will rely mainly on effective substances ensuring consumer, animal, and environmental welfare. Ideally, dietary antiparasitics such as praziquantel exhibiting mild environmental impact and high efficacy against a wide range of pathogens should be adopted. Moreover, combined strategies such as integrated pest management, involving various management practices with limited use of chemicals, should be a priority for specific parasitic outbreaks. The information presented in this review can guide future research and promote effective and prudent parasite control practices for Mediterranean-farmed fish.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 2","pages":"622-643"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12857","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135878960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The food production system ‘aquaponics’ has moved a long way from its inceptions in the 1970s and 1980s. This paper suggests that it is the principle of aquaponics that should define what aquaponics is and then the rest follows according to systems and technologies. This paper supports the Palm et al. (Aquac Int. 2018;26(3):813–42) position of having a nutrient supply threshold (>50%) from the feed via the aquatic organisms to the plants. We test the most recent alternative definitions (e.g. Baganz et al. Rev Aquac. 2021;14:252–64) that overcomplicate existing definitions and nomenclature. Any new definition needs to be referential to existing terms and properly tested. This paper does exactly that, concluding that several recent changes by Baganz et al. (Rev Aquac. 2021;14:252–64) are not needed. We also debate that the key principle behind aquaponics is ‘all about coupling’. Whilst coupling is an important aspect, existing technologies and those that will emerge are far more complex. Finally, this paper highlights the idiosyncrasies in the term aquaponics and we suggest an alternative term ‘aquaorganoponics’, which in essence better describes the principles of aquaponics (s.s.) which transfers natural organic compounds combined with microbes in water from the aquaculture unit to the plants.
{"title":"Aquaponics nomenclature matters: It is about principles and technologies and not as much about coupling","authors":"Harry W. Palm, Ulrich Knaus, Benz Kotzen","doi":"10.1111/raq.12847","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12847","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The food production system ‘<i>aquaponics</i>’ has moved a long way from its inceptions in the 1970s and 1980s. This paper suggests that it is the principle of aquaponics that should define what aquaponics is and then the rest follows according to systems and technologies. This paper supports the Palm et al. (<i>Aquac Int</i>. 2018;26(3):813–42) position of having a nutrient supply threshold (>50%) from the feed via the aquatic organisms to the plants. We test the most recent alternative definitions (e.g. Baganz et al. <i>Rev Aquac</i>. 2021;14:252–64) that overcomplicate existing definitions and nomenclature. Any new definition needs to be referential to existing terms and properly tested. This paper does exactly that, concluding that several recent changes by Baganz et al. (<i>Rev Aquac</i>. 2021;14:252–64) are not needed. We also debate that the key principle behind aquaponics is ‘<i>all about coupling</i>’. Whilst coupling is an important aspect, existing technologies and those that will emerge are far more complex. Finally, this paper highlights the idiosyncrasies in the term aquaponics and we suggest an alternative term ‘<i>aquaorganoponics</i>’, which in essence better describes the principles of aquaponics (<i>s.s.</i>) which transfers natural organic compounds combined with microbes in water from the aquaculture unit to the plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 1","pages":"473-490"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12847","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135980374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Open offshore areas boast strong physical self-purification capacity and abundant non-fossil energy resources, such as wind, waves, and solar energy. Consequently, the global community anticipates nearshore aquaculture to transition towards offshore to help increase production, alleviate eutrophication, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To date, China has constructed over 40 sets of deeper-offshore aquaculture (DOA) infrastructures, encompassing various types of pens, cages and closed containment systems. Although DOA holds vast potential to address food security and aquaculture sustainability in China, its current development trajectory struggles to meet those goals and primarily achieves profitability by focusing on high-value species or products. For DOA to realize its potential, innovative production systems must tackle three key contradictions: enterprise profitability versus product affordability, clean energy-based products versus carbon-intensive products, and automated operation versus re-employment of coastal fish farmers. Resolving these contradictions requires the development of a large-scale, anti-typhoon offshore enclosure that integrates mariculture with other industries, such as wind farming, food processing, and tourism. This approach will foster a sustainable balance between profitability, environmental impact, and employment opportunities in the sector.
开放的近海区域拥有强大的物理自净能力和丰富的非化石能源资源,如风能、波浪能和太阳能。因此,国际社会期待近岸水产养殖向离岸过渡,以帮助提高产量、缓解富营养化和减少温室气体排放。迄今为止,中国已建造了 40 多套离岸深层水产养殖(DOA)基础设施,包括各种类型的围栏、网箱和封闭隔离系统。尽管 DOA 在解决中国粮食安全和水产养殖可持续性方面具有巨大潜力,但其目前的发展轨迹难以实现这些目标,主要是通过专注于高价值物种或产品来实现盈利。要实现 DOA 的潜力,创新生产系统必须解决三个关键矛盾:企业盈利能力与产品可负担性、清洁能源产品与碳密集型产品、自动化操作与沿海养殖户再就业。要解决这些矛盾,就必须发展大规模的抗台风近海围网,将海产养殖与风力养殖、食品加工和旅游业等其他产业结合起来。这种方法将促进该行业在盈利能力、环境影响和就业机会之间实现可持续的平衡。
{"title":"Advancements and hurdles of deeper-offshore aquaculture in China","authors":"Shuang-Lin Dong, Yun-Wei Dong, Liu-Yi Huang, Yan-Gen Zhou, Ling Cao, Xiang-Li Tian, Li-Min Han, Da-Hai Li","doi":"10.1111/raq.12858","DOIUrl":"10.1111/raq.12858","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Open offshore areas boast strong physical self-purification capacity and abundant non-fossil energy resources, such as wind, waves, and solar energy. Consequently, the global community anticipates nearshore aquaculture to transition towards offshore to help increase production, alleviate eutrophication, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To date, China has constructed over 40 sets of deeper-offshore aquaculture (DOA) infrastructures, encompassing various types of pens, cages and closed containment systems. Although DOA holds vast potential to address food security and aquaculture sustainability in China, its current development trajectory struggles to meet those goals and primarily achieves profitability by focusing on high-value species or products. For DOA to realize its potential, innovative production systems must tackle three key contradictions: enterprise profitability versus product affordability, clean energy-based products versus carbon-intensive products, and automated operation versus re-employment of coastal fish farmers. Resolving these contradictions requires the development of a large-scale, anti-typhoon offshore enclosure that integrates mariculture with other industries, such as wind farming, food processing, and tourism. This approach will foster a sustainable balance between profitability, environmental impact, and employment opportunities in the sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 2","pages":"644-655"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90568827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}