首页 > 最新文献

中华胃肠外科杂志最新文献

英文 中文
[Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity matched analysis]. [机器人手术和腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:倾向匹配分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240130-00050
R Q Li, J J Zhou, S Zhao, D R Wang
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical data of patients with mid-low rectal cancer (caudad edge of tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge) treated with laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery in the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University from July 2019 to November 2021. Patients whose anus had not been completely preserved, with malignant obstruction or perforation, with poor anal function indicated by preoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, or with incomplete follow-up information were excluded. The inclusion criteria were met by 973 patients. After matching participants in a 1:2 propensity ratio with a caliper width of 0.02 standard deviations to reduce bias between patients caused by baseline imbalances, 175 patients were included in the robotic surgery group(RS) and 350 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group(LS). Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between these two groups. The primary objectives were to compare oncological prognoses between the two groups, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and anal function as assessed by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scoring system, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of life using the quality-of-life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-CR38 to establish a new scale, these being evaluated 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Higher functional module scores indicate better patient function, whereas lower symptom module scores indicate milder symptoms. Additionally, we compared the incidence of perioperative-related complications in the study patients. <b>Results:</b> (1) Oncological outcomes: The 2-year DFS and OS rates were 89.7% and 93.1%, respectively, for the robotic group and 86.0% and 91.7%, respectively, for the laparoscopic group. These differences are not statistically significant (<i>P</i>=0.230 for DFS, <i>P</i>=0.570 for OS). (2) Anal function: Among patients who had not undergone ileostomy, anal function was better in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group 6 months postoperatively (severe LARS: 9.8% [14/143] vs. 19.2% [56/292], χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.712; <i>P</i> = 0.035). However, 12 months postoperatively, anal function did not differ significantly between the two groups. In patients with an ileostomy, anal function did not differ significantly between the two groups at 6 or 12 months postoperatively (both <i>P</i> > 0.05). (3) Postoperative quality-of-life: Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had better scores in the following aspects of quality of life: physical functioning (mean score 77.1±6.9 vs. 71.7±5.6, <i>t</i> =8.965, <i>P</i>=0.005), role in functioning (mean score 73.4±5.3 vs. 71.6±5.1, <i>t</i> = =3.851, <i>P</i> = 0.010), urinary tr
目的:探讨机器人联合腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的近期疗效。方法:回顾性队列研究2019年7月至2021年11月南京大学附属苏北人民医院腹腔镜或机器人根治术治疗的中低位直肠癌(肿瘤尾缘距肛缘小于10 cm)患者的临床资料。排除肛门未完整保存、恶性梗阻或穿孔、术前低前切除术综合征(LARS)评分提示肛门功能差或随访信息不完整的患者。973例患者符合纳入标准。在以1:2的倾向比匹配参与者,卡尺宽度为0.02标准差,以减少基线不平衡引起的患者之间的偏差后,175名患者被纳入机器人手术组(RS), 350名患者被纳入腹腔镜手术组(LS)。两组的基线特征无显著差异。主要目的是比较两组患者术后6个月和12个月的肿瘤预后,包括无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和肛门功能(通过低前切除术综合征(LARS)评分系统评估)。次要结果包括术后生活质量,使用生活质量问卷C30 (QLQ-C30)和QLQ-CR38(建立新的量表),分别在术后6个月和12个月进行评估。功能模块得分越高表明患者功能越好,而症状模块得分越低表明症状较轻。此外,我们比较了研究患者围手术期相关并发症的发生率。结果:(1)肿瘤预后:机器人组2年DFS和OS分别为89.7%和93.1%,腹腔镜组2年DFS和OS分别为86.0%和91.7%。这些差异无统计学意义(DFS P=0.230, OS P=0.570)。(2)肛门功能:未行回肠造口术的患者,术后6个月机器人组肛门功能优于腹腔镜组(严重LARS: 9.8%[14/143]比19.2% [56/292],χ2 = 6.712;P = 0.035)。然而,术后12个月,两组之间的肛门功能无显著差异。在回肠造口患者中,术后6个月和12个月两组的肛门功能差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。(3)术后生活质量:与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组在以下方面的生活质量得分更高:身体功能(平均得分77.1±6.9比71.7±5.6,t =8.965, P=0.005),功能作用(平均得分73.4±5.3比71.6±5.1,t = =3.851, P= 0.010),泌尿道并发症(平均得分17.5±1.5比23.4±1.6,t = 41.40, P= 0.001),胃肠道症状(平均得分21.2±2.1比26.6±1.9,t = 29.40, P= 0.001)。差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。(4)围手术期并发症:两组术中并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。腹腔镜组术后尿潴留发生率显著高于机器人组(5.0% [19/350]vs. 1.7% [3/175], χ2 = 4.009, P = 0.044)。结论:在我们的研究中,机器人直肠癌根治术的短期肿瘤预后与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术相似。然而,机器人根治术在肛门功能和术后生活质量方面具有优势,同时也减少了围手术期泌尿系统并发症的发生率。
{"title":"[Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity matched analysis].","authors":"R Q Li, J J Zhou, S Zhao, D R Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240130-00050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240130-00050","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To investigate the short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical data of patients with mid-low rectal cancer (caudad edge of tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge) treated with laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery in the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University from July 2019 to November 2021. Patients whose anus had not been completely preserved, with malignant obstruction or perforation, with poor anal function indicated by preoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, or with incomplete follow-up information were excluded. The inclusion criteria were met by 973 patients. After matching participants in a 1:2 propensity ratio with a caliper width of 0.02 standard deviations to reduce bias between patients caused by baseline imbalances, 175 patients were included in the robotic surgery group(RS) and 350 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group(LS). Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between these two groups. The primary objectives were to compare oncological prognoses between the two groups, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and anal function as assessed by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scoring system, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of life using the quality-of-life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-CR38 to establish a new scale, these being evaluated 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Higher functional module scores indicate better patient function, whereas lower symptom module scores indicate milder symptoms. Additionally, we compared the incidence of perioperative-related complications in the study patients. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; (1) Oncological outcomes: The 2-year DFS and OS rates were 89.7% and 93.1%, respectively, for the robotic group and 86.0% and 91.7%, respectively, for the laparoscopic group. These differences are not statistically significant (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.230 for DFS, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.570 for OS). (2) Anal function: Among patients who had not undergone ileostomy, anal function was better in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group 6 months postoperatively (severe LARS: 9.8% [14/143] vs. 19.2% [56/292], χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 6.712; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.035). However, 12 months postoperatively, anal function did not differ significantly between the two groups. In patients with an ileostomy, anal function did not differ significantly between the two groups at 6 or 12 months postoperatively (both &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &gt; 0.05). (3) Postoperative quality-of-life: Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had better scores in the following aspects of quality of life: physical functioning (mean score 77.1±6.9 vs. 71.7±5.6, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt; =8.965, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.005), role in functioning (mean score 73.4±5.3 vs. 71.6±5.1, &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt; = =3.851, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.010), urinary tr","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 12","pages":"1261-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula:current status and prospects]. 【复杂肛瘘的诊断与治疗:现状与展望】。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240912-00315
J Zhu, J H Ding

In recent years, although we have made significant progress in the precise diagnosis and treatment of anal fistula, we still lack a thorough and in-depth understanding about the mechanism of formation, development, nonunion and recurrence of complex anal fistula. As a result, there is still a high failure rate, recurrence rate and the risk of the fecal incontinence after treatment. There is hardly any consensus on whatever treatment options, and the various treatment also means no established standard treatment for complex anal fistula. According to recent relevant literatures and personal experience, discuss recent pathbreaking updates in the management of complex anal fistula, we systematically summarize and generalize some critical issues in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula, including the pathogenesis, reasonable classification criteria, preoperative evaluation and surgical procedure selection. At the same time, we envision the future development directions.

近年来,虽然我们在肛瘘的精确诊断和治疗方面取得了重大进展,但我们对复杂肛瘘的形成、发展、不愈合和复发的机制仍然缺乏全面深入的认识。因此,治疗后仍有较高的失败率、复发率和大小便失禁的风险。对于治疗方案几乎没有任何共识,各种治疗方法也意味着对复杂肛瘘没有既定的标准治疗。根据近期相关文献和个人经验,讨论近年来复杂肛瘘治疗的突破性进展,系统总结和概括复杂肛瘘诊断和治疗中的一些关键问题,包括发病机制、合理的分类标准、术前评估和手术方式的选择。同时展望未来的发展方向。
{"title":"[Diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula:current status and prospects].","authors":"J Zhu, J H Ding","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240912-00315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240912-00315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, although we have made significant progress in the precise diagnosis and treatment of anal fistula, we still lack a thorough and in-depth understanding about the mechanism of formation, development, nonunion and recurrence of complex anal fistula. As a result, there is still a high failure rate, recurrence rate and the risk of the fecal incontinence after treatment. There is hardly any consensus on whatever treatment options, and the various treatment also means no established standard treatment for complex anal fistula. According to recent relevant literatures and personal experience, discuss recent pathbreaking updates in the management of complex anal fistula, we systematically summarize and generalize some critical issues in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula, including the pathogenesis, reasonable classification criteria, preoperative evaluation and surgical procedure selection. At the same time, we envision the future development directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 12","pages":"1221-1226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142878034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Analysis of the efficacy of adjusting the dose of imatinib with therapeutic drug monitoring in adjuvant treatment after complete resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]. [胃肠道间质瘤完全切除术后辅助治疗中利用治疗药物监测调整伊马替尼剂量的疗效分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240807-00273
Z L Chen, H K Tian, J N Ding, Z Y Li, G Mao, Y Y Du, Q Shen, H Zhou, Y Han, X Y Zeng, K X Tao, P Zhang
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy of adjusting the dose of imatinib dose in the context of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who are receiving adjuvant therapy after complete resection of their tumors. <b>Methods:</b> This was a descriptive study. Inclusion criteria were (1) complete surgical resection with a pathological diagnosis of GIST, (2) postoperative adjuvant therapy with imatinib and dosage adjustment, (3) multiple TDM of imatinib, and (4) complete clinical, pathological, and follow-up data. The data of 70 patients with GISTs treated at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2015 and December 2023 were collected retrospectively. The study cohort comprised 15 (21.4%) men and 55 (78.6%) women of median age 60 years (range: 25-82). Of the eligible patients, 49 (70.0%) were at high-risk, 14 (20.0%) at intermediate-risk, six (8.6%) at low-risk, and one (1.4%) at very low risk. Patients were followed up by the gastrointestinal stromal tumor clinic every 2-3 months and their plasma concentrations of imatinib were checked. The dose was adjusted to 300 mg/d or 200 mg/d depending on whether they had had ≥ grade III adverse reactions, and whether the first plasma concentration of imatinib was ≥ 1,500 μg/L or between the expected range of 760 μg/L-1,100 μg/L. Studied indicators included adverse reactions, quality of life before and after dose adjustment, and overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after dose adjustment. <b>Results:</b> Before dose adjustment, all 70 patients received 400 mg of imatinib daily, with initial TDM values of 1,900 ± 568 μg/L, for a median duration of 8.3 months. After dose adjustment, 60 patients received 300 mg daily, with a TDM of 1,216 ± 350 μg/L, whereas 10 received 200 mg daily, with a TDM of 1,023 ± 269 μg/L. The median duration of treatment after dose adjustment was 23.4 months. Compared with those whose dosages were not adjusted, the incidence of bone marrow suppression was significantly lower (74.3% [52/70] vs. 51.4% [36/70], χ<sup>2</sup>=9.202, <i>P</i>=0.010); as were the incidences of edema (95.7% [67/70] vs. 50.0% [35/70], χ<sup>2</sup>=40.526, <i>P</i><0.001); skin reactions (70.0% [49/70] vs. 32.9% [23/70), χ<sup>2</sup>=22.495, <i>P</i><0.001); and gastrointestinal reactions (38.6% [27/70] vs. 10.0% [7/70], χ<sup>2</sup>=15.899, <i>P</i><0.001) in those whose dosages were adjusted. The average total scores for physical health before and after dose adjustment were 76 ± 5 and 88 ± 4, respectively; whereas the mental health scores were 75 ± 6 and 89 ± 4, respectively. The median follow-up period was 36 months (range 6-126). During the first 3 years of follow-up, five high-risk patients with non-gastric GISTs developed recurrences. The 3-year overall survival rate was 100%, and the 3-year RFS rate was 92.8%, high-risk patients having a 3-year RFS rate of 89.8%. <b>C
目的探讨在胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者肿瘤完全切除后接受辅助治疗时,在治疗药物监测(TDM)的背景下调整伊马替尼剂量的疗效。研究方法这是一项描述性研究。纳入标准为:(1)病理诊断为 GIST 的完整手术切除;(2)术后接受伊马替尼辅助治疗并调整剂量;(3)伊马替尼的多次 TDM;(4)完整的临床、病理和随访数据。研究回顾性收集了华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院在2015年1月至2023年12月期间收治的70例GIST患者的数据。研究队列包括 15 名(21.4%)男性和 55 名(78.6%)女性,中位年龄为 60 岁(25-82 岁)。在符合条件的患者中,49 人(70.0%)为高风险,14 人(20.0%)为中风险,6 人(8.6%)为低风险,1 人(1.4%)为极低风险。胃肠道间质瘤诊所每2-3个月对患者进行一次随访,并检查他们的伊马替尼血浆浓度。根据患者是否出现≥III级不良反应,以及伊马替尼的首次血浆浓度是否≥1,500 μg/L或介于760 μg/L-1,100 μg/L的预期范围,将剂量调整为300 mg/d或200 mg/d。研究指标包括不良反应、剂量调整前后的生活质量、剂量调整后的总生存率和无复发生存率(RFS)。研究结果剂量调整前,所有70名患者每天服用400毫克伊马替尼,初始TDM值为1,900 ± 568微克/升,中位持续时间为8.3个月。剂量调整后,60 名患者每天服用 300 毫克,TDM 为 1,216 ± 350 微克/升;10 名患者每天服用 200 毫克,TDM 为 1,023 ± 269 微克/升。剂量调整后的中位治疗时间为 23.4 个月。与未调整剂量者相比,骨髓抑制发生率显著降低(74.3% [52/70] vs. 51.4% [36/70],χ2=9.202,P=0.010);水肿发生率也显著降低(95.7% [67/70] vs. 50.0% [35/70],χ2=40.526,P2=22.495,P2=15.899,PC结论):在TDM的指导下适当减少伊马替尼的用量,可减轻GIST患者完全切除术后辅助伊马替尼治疗的严重不良反应,提高患者的生活质量。
{"title":"[Analysis of the efficacy of adjusting the dose of imatinib with therapeutic drug monitoring in adjuvant treatment after complete resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].","authors":"Z L Chen, H K Tian, J N Ding, Z Y Li, G Mao, Y Y Du, Q Shen, H Zhou, Y Han, X Y Zeng, K X Tao, P Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240807-00273","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240807-00273","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To explore the efficacy of adjusting the dose of imatinib dose in the context of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who are receiving adjuvant therapy after complete resection of their tumors. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This was a descriptive study. Inclusion criteria were (1) complete surgical resection with a pathological diagnosis of GIST, (2) postoperative adjuvant therapy with imatinib and dosage adjustment, (3) multiple TDM of imatinib, and (4) complete clinical, pathological, and follow-up data. The data of 70 patients with GISTs treated at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2015 and December 2023 were collected retrospectively. The study cohort comprised 15 (21.4%) men and 55 (78.6%) women of median age 60 years (range: 25-82). Of the eligible patients, 49 (70.0%) were at high-risk, 14 (20.0%) at intermediate-risk, six (8.6%) at low-risk, and one (1.4%) at very low risk. Patients were followed up by the gastrointestinal stromal tumor clinic every 2-3 months and their plasma concentrations of imatinib were checked. The dose was adjusted to 300 mg/d or 200 mg/d depending on whether they had had ≥ grade III adverse reactions, and whether the first plasma concentration of imatinib was ≥ 1,500 μg/L or between the expected range of 760 μg/L-1,100 μg/L. Studied indicators included adverse reactions, quality of life before and after dose adjustment, and overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after dose adjustment. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Before dose adjustment, all 70 patients received 400 mg of imatinib daily, with initial TDM values of 1,900 ± 568 μg/L, for a median duration of 8.3 months. After dose adjustment, 60 patients received 300 mg daily, with a TDM of 1,216 ± 350 μg/L, whereas 10 received 200 mg daily, with a TDM of 1,023 ± 269 μg/L. The median duration of treatment after dose adjustment was 23.4 months. Compared with those whose dosages were not adjusted, the incidence of bone marrow suppression was significantly lower (74.3% [52/70] vs. 51.4% [36/70], χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=9.202, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.010); as were the incidences of edema (95.7% [67/70] vs. 50.0% [35/70], χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=40.526, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001); skin reactions (70.0% [49/70] vs. 32.9% [23/70), χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=22.495, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001); and gastrointestinal reactions (38.6% [27/70] vs. 10.0% [7/70], χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=15.899, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001) in those whose dosages were adjusted. The average total scores for physical health before and after dose adjustment were 76 ± 5 and 88 ± 4, respectively; whereas the mental health scores were 75 ± 6 and 89 ± 4, respectively. The median follow-up period was 36 months (range 6-126). During the first 3 years of follow-up, five high-risk patients with non-gastric GISTs developed recurrences. The 3-year overall survival rate was 100%, and the 3-year RFS rate was 92.8%, high-risk patients having a 3-year RFS rate of 89.8%. &lt;b&gt;C","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1148-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Rethinking several issues related to surgical treatment for advanced GIST in the era of targeted therapy]. [反思靶向治疗时代晚期 GIST 手术治疗的几个相关问题]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240907-00307
M Wang, H Cao

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have achieved great success in the treatment of GISTs. The role and value of surgery in advanced GISTs are still controversial. This article aims to review the progress related to surgery for advanced GIST in the context of targeted therapy, particularly exploring the issues related to the combination of surgery and targeted therapy. Studies have shown that selected advanced GISTs can benefit from surgery, but there is still a lack of universally accepted screening criteria and operational norms, and multiple factors affect the effectiveness of surgical treatment for advanced GISTs. Different surgical strategies should be developed for imatinib-resistant GISTs or multiple TKI-resistant GISTs. During the period when the tumors respond to imatinib, cytoreductive surgery is most likely to improve the survival of patients. Early or localized progression should be identified and promptly intervened with surgery. At present, there are few studies on sunitinib or regorafenib combined with surgery, and their feasibility and value are still controversial. Ripretinib combined with cytoreductive surgery may be a new breakthrough point.

胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)是胃肠道中最常见的间质瘤,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)在治疗GIST方面取得了巨大成功。手术治疗在晚期胃肠道间质瘤中的作用和价值仍存在争议。本文旨在回顾在靶向治疗背景下晚期GIST手术治疗的相关进展,尤其是探讨手术与靶向治疗相结合的相关问题。研究表明,经过筛选的晚期GIST可从手术中获益,但目前仍缺乏普遍接受的筛查标准和操作规范,多种因素影响着晚期GIST的手术治疗效果。对于伊马替尼耐药的 GIST 或多种 TKI 耐药的 GIST,应制定不同的手术策略。在肿瘤对伊马替尼有反应期间,细胞切除手术最有可能提高患者的生存率。应识别早期或局部进展,并及时进行手术干预。目前,关于舒尼替尼或瑞戈非尼联合手术的研究较少,其可行性和价值仍存在争议。瑞瑞替尼联合细胞减灭术可能是一个新的突破点。
{"title":"[Rethinking several issues related to surgical treatment for advanced GIST in the era of targeted therapy].","authors":"M Wang, H Cao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240907-00307","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240907-00307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have achieved great success in the treatment of GISTs. The role and value of surgery in advanced GISTs are still controversial. This article aims to review the progress related to surgery for advanced GIST in the context of targeted therapy, particularly exploring the issues related to the combination of surgery and targeted therapy. Studies have shown that selected advanced GISTs can benefit from surgery, but there is still a lack of universally accepted screening criteria and operational norms, and multiple factors affect the effectiveness of surgical treatment for advanced GISTs. Different surgical strategies should be developed for imatinib-resistant GISTs or multiple TKI-resistant GISTs. During the period when the tumors respond to imatinib, cytoreductive surgery is most likely to improve the survival of patients. Early or localized progression should be identified and promptly intervened with surgery. At present, there are few studies on sunitinib or regorafenib combined with surgery, and their feasibility and value are still controversial. Ripretinib combined with cytoreductive surgery may be a new breakthrough point.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1107-1116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Analysis of risk factors for adverse outcomes in 10,135 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies aged 65 years and over who underwent elective surgery]. [对 10 135 名 65 岁及以上接受择期手术的胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者不良预后的风险因素进行分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240416-00141
W Wang, J P Wang, D Wang, H Z Cai, Z Q Wu, F Shan, Z Y Li
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the risk factors for postoperative adverse events in older persons with gastrointestinal malignancies and thus provide reference for selection of surgery and evaluation of such patients. <b>Methods:</b> An observational study design was employed, the study cohort comprising patients aged 65 years and over with gastrointestinal malignancies who underwent elective surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2008 to 2022. In this study, we compared the clinical characteristics (disease type, tumor stage), surgical safety (combined organ resection, operation duration, comorbidities), and treatment outcomes (postoperative complications, unplanned reoperation, and perioperative mortality) of these patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 10,135 patients, of whom 74.7% (7,568) were 65-75 years old (excluding 75 years old), 23.6% (2,391) 75-85 years old (excluding 85 years old), and 1.7% (176) ≥85 years old. The type of cancer was colorectal in 63.4% (6,427 patients) and gastric in 36.6% (3,708); 62.0% (6,284/10,135)of the patients had stage II or III disease. The proportion of stage III and stage IV tumors was higher in patients aged over 85 years (47.4% [73/154) and 11.0% [17/154]), respectively, than in those aged 75-85 years (41.6% [854/2 051) and 8.2% [168/2 051]), respectively, and those aged 65-75 years (40.1% [2,576/6,431) and 10.9% [700/6,431]); these differences are statistically significant (χ<sup>2</sup>=27.95, <i>P</i><0.01). Comorbidity was present in 50.6% (5,128/10,135) of the whole study cohort, comprising 58.0% (102/176) of those aged over 85 years, this being significantly higher than the 56.3% (1,346/2,391) in those aged 75-85 years and 48.6% (3,678/7,568) of those aged 65-75 years. The main comorbidities were hypertension (37.3%), diabetes (16.4%), and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (14.0%). Minimally invasive surgery was performed on 36.9% (3,740/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the 38.4% in 65-75 years old patients being significantly higher than the 32.5% in those aged 75-85 years and the 29.0% in those aged over 85 years; these differences are statistically significant (χ<sup>2</sup>=31.97, <i>P</i><0.01). Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 9.1% (924/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the proportion of patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy being significantly higher in those aged 65-75 years (11.1%) than in those aged 75-85 years (3.4%) and over 85 years (0.6%); these differences are statistically significant (χ<sup>2</sup>=148.98, <i>P</i><0.01). Combined organ resection was performed in 4.9% (496/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the proportion undergoing combined organ resection being significantly lower in those aged over 85 years (2.3%) than in those aged 65-75 years (5.3%) and 75-85 years (3.8%); these differenc
目的探讨老年人胃肠道恶性肿瘤术后不良事件的风险因素,从而为此类患者的手术选择和评估提供参考。方法:采用观察性研究设计:采用观察性研究设计,研究队列包括 2008 年至 2022 年期间在北京大学肿瘤医院接受择期手术的 65 岁及以上胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者。在这项研究中,我们比较了这些患者的临床特征(疾病类型、肿瘤分期)、手术安全性(联合器官切除、手术时间、合并症)和治疗效果(术后并发症、非计划再次手术和围手术期死亡率)。为确定与不良后果相关的风险因素,进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。研究结果研究队列包括10135名患者,其中74.7%(7568人)为65-75岁(不包括75岁),23.6%(2391人)为75-85岁(不包括85岁),1.7%(176人)≥85岁。63.4%(6 427 名患者)的癌症类型为结直肠癌,36.6%(3 708 名患者)的癌症类型为胃癌;62.0%(6 284/10 135 名患者)的患者处于 II 期或 III 期。85 岁以上患者的 III 期和 IV 期肿瘤比例(分别为 47.4% [73/154] 和 11.0% [17/154])高于 75-85 岁患者(分别为 41.6% [854/2 051] 和 8.2% [168/2 051])。这些差异具有统计学意义(χ2=27.95,P2=31.97,P2=148.98,P2=11.20,PF=46.85,PP>0.05)。计划外再次手术的发生率为1.9%(193/10,135),住院期间死亡的发生率为0.3%(32/10,135)。85 岁以上、75-85 岁和 65-75 岁年龄组的围手术期死亡率分别为 1.1%、0.5% 和 0.2%。这些差异具有统计学意义(χ2=9.71,PPPPPP180 分钟(OR=1.82,95%CI:1.53-2.15,PC结论:与无上述特征的患者相比,患有合并症和 IV 期疾病的老年胃肠道肿瘤患者接受手术时间较长的开腹手术,发生不良预后的风险更高。
{"title":"[Analysis of risk factors for adverse outcomes in 10,135 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies aged 65 years and over who underwent elective surgery].","authors":"W Wang, J P Wang, D Wang, H Z Cai, Z Q Wu, F Shan, Z Y Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240416-00141","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240416-00141","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To explore the risk factors for postoperative adverse events in older persons with gastrointestinal malignancies and thus provide reference for selection of surgery and evaluation of such patients. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; An observational study design was employed, the study cohort comprising patients aged 65 years and over with gastrointestinal malignancies who underwent elective surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2008 to 2022. In this study, we compared the clinical characteristics (disease type, tumor stage), surgical safety (combined organ resection, operation duration, comorbidities), and treatment outcomes (postoperative complications, unplanned reoperation, and perioperative mortality) of these patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The study cohort comprised 10,135 patients, of whom 74.7% (7,568) were 65-75 years old (excluding 75 years old), 23.6% (2,391) 75-85 years old (excluding 85 years old), and 1.7% (176) ≥85 years old. The type of cancer was colorectal in 63.4% (6,427 patients) and gastric in 36.6% (3,708); 62.0% (6,284/10,135)of the patients had stage II or III disease. The proportion of stage III and stage IV tumors was higher in patients aged over 85 years (47.4% [73/154) and 11.0% [17/154]), respectively, than in those aged 75-85 years (41.6% [854/2 051) and 8.2% [168/2 051]), respectively, and those aged 65-75 years (40.1% [2,576/6,431) and 10.9% [700/6,431]); these differences are statistically significant (χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=27.95, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01). Comorbidity was present in 50.6% (5,128/10,135) of the whole study cohort, comprising 58.0% (102/176) of those aged over 85 years, this being significantly higher than the 56.3% (1,346/2,391) in those aged 75-85 years and 48.6% (3,678/7,568) of those aged 65-75 years. The main comorbidities were hypertension (37.3%), diabetes (16.4%), and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (14.0%). Minimally invasive surgery was performed on 36.9% (3,740/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the 38.4% in 65-75 years old patients being significantly higher than the 32.5% in those aged 75-85 years and the 29.0% in those aged over 85 years; these differences are statistically significant (χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=31.97, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01). Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 9.1% (924/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the proportion of patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy being significantly higher in those aged 65-75 years (11.1%) than in those aged 75-85 years (3.4%) and over 85 years (0.6%); these differences are statistically significant (χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;=148.98, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01). Combined organ resection was performed in 4.9% (496/10,135) of the whole study cohort, the proportion undergoing combined organ resection being significantly lower in those aged over 85 years (2.3%) than in those aged 65-75 years (5.3%) and 75-85 years (3.8%); these differenc","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1155-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Prognosis and its influencing factors in patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors at low risk of recurrence: a retrospective multicenter study in China]. [中国非胃肠道间质瘤低复发风险患者的预后及其影响因素:一项多中心回顾性研究]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240904-00303
L X Yang, W L Yang, X Wu, P Zhang, B Zhang, J J Ma, X H Zhang, H R Qian, Y Zhou, T Chen, H Xu, G L Gu, Z D Gao, G Zhai, X F Sun, C Q Jing, H B Qiu, X D Gao, H Cao, M Wang
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prognosis and the factors that influence it in patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who are at low risk of recurrence. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study. Clinicopathologic and prognostic data from patients with non-gastric GISTs and at low risk of recurrence (i.e., very low-risk or low-risk according to the 2008 version of the Modified NIH Risk Classification), who attended 18 medical centers in China between January 2000 and June 2023, were collected. We excluded patients with a history of prior malignancy, concurrent primary malignancy, multiple GISTs, and those who had received preoperative imatinib. The study cohort comprised 1,571 patients with GISTs, 370 (23.6%) of whom were at very low-risk and 1,201 (76.4%) at low-risk of recurrence. The cohort included 799 (50.9%) men and 772 (49.1%) women of median age 57 (16-93) years. Patients were followed up to July 2024. The prognosis and its influencing factors were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves for tumor diameter and Ki67 were established, and the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cut-off value with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Propensity score matching was implemented using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method with a matching tolerance of 0.02. <b>Results:</b> With a median follow-up of 63 (12-267) months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates of the 1,571 patients were 99.5% and 98.0%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.3% and 94.4%, respectively. During postoperative follow-up, 3.8% (60/1,571) patients had disease recurrence or metastasis, comprising 0.8% (3/370) in the very low-risk group and 4.7% (57/1,201) in the low-risk group. In the low-risk group, recurrence or metastasis occurred in 5.5% (25/457) of patients with duodenal GISTs, 3.9% (25/645) of those with small intestinal GISTs, 9.2% (6/65) of those with rectal GISTs, and 10.0% (1/10) of those with colonic GISTs. Among the 60 patients with metastases, 56.7% (34/60) of the metastases were located in the abdominal cavity, 53.3% (32/60) in the liver, and 3.3% (2/60) in bone. During the follow-up period, 13 patients (0.8%) died of disease. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for tumor diameter and Ki67 and assessed using the Jordon index. This showed that the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.670-0.793, sensitivity 77.7%, specificity 64.1%). Furthermore, the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for Ki67 was 5% (AUC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.624-0.762, sensitivity 60.7%, specificity 65.3%). Multifactorial analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥3.5 cm, Ki67 ≥5%, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for DFS in patients with non-gastric GISTs at low
研究目的研究低复发风险的非胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的预后及其影响因素。研究方法这是一项回顾性队列研究。研究收集了2000年1月至2023年6月期间在中国18家医疗中心就诊的非胃癌GIST低复发风险患者(即根据2008年版《美国国立卫生研究院风险分类》(Modified NIH Risk Classification)划分的极低风险或低风险患者)的临床病理和预后数据。我们排除了既往有恶性肿瘤病史、同时患有原发性恶性肿瘤、多发性 GIST 以及术前接受过伊马替尼治疗的患者。研究队列包括1571名GIST患者,其中370人(23.6%)为极低风险,1201人(76.4%)为低复发风险。队列中包括799名男性(50.9%)和772名女性(49.1%),中位年龄为57(16-93)岁。患者随访至2024年7月。对预后及其影响因素进行了分析。建立了肿瘤直径和Ki67的接收者操作特征曲线,并计算了灵敏度、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)和最佳临界值及95%置信区间。采用 1:1 近邻匹配法进行倾向评分匹配,匹配公差为 0.02。结果中位随访时间为 63(12-267)个月,1571 名患者的 5 年和 10 年总生存率(OS)分别为 99.5% 和 98.0%,5 年和 10 年无病生存率(DFS)分别为 96.3% 和 94.4%。术后随访期间,3.8%(60/1,571)的患者出现疾病复发或转移,其中极低风险组为0.8%(3/370),低风险组为4.7%(57/1,201)。在低风险组中,5.5%(25/457)的十二指肠GIST患者、3.9%(25/645)的小肠GIST患者、9.2%(6/65)的直肠GIST患者和10.0%(1/10)的结肠GIST患者出现复发或转移。在有转移灶的 60 名患者中,56.7%(34/60)的转移灶位于腹腔,53.3%(32/60)位于肝脏,3.3%(2/60)位于骨骼。在随访期间,13 名患者(0.8%)因病死亡。我们绘制了肿瘤直径和Ki67的接收者操作特征曲线,并使用乔登指数进行了评估。结果显示,当肿瘤直径的临界值为 3.5 厘米时,两组患者的 DFS 差异具有统计学意义(AUC 0.731,95% CI:0.670-0.793,敏感性 77.7%,特异性 64.1%)。此外,当 Ki67 的临界值为 5%时,两组患者的 DFS 差异具有统计学意义(AUC 0.693,95% CI:0.624-0.762,敏感性 60.7%,特异性 65.3%)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤直径≥3.5厘米、Ki67≥5%和R1切除术是低复发风险非胃部GIST患者DFS的独立危险因素(均为P57年),Ki67≥5%和R1切除术也是低复发风险非胃部GIST患者OS的独立危险因素(均为PP>0.05)。伊马替尼治疗时间少于1年组的10年DFS和OS分别为87.5%和95.5%,治疗时间超过1年组的10年DFS和OS分别为88.5%和97.8%。伊马替尼治疗时间少于3年组的10年DFS和OS分别为89.6%和92.6%,伊马替尼治疗时间超过3年组的10年DFS和OS分别为88.0%和100.0%。结论原发性、非胃部、低复发风险 GIST 的总体预后相对较好;但也会出现复发和转移。年龄、肿瘤直径、Ki67 和 R1 切除术可能会影响预后。对于一些低复发风险的 GIST 患者,在适当的时间内使用伊马替尼进行辅助治疗,可能有助于预防复发和提高生存率。
{"title":"[Prognosis and its influencing factors in patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors at low risk of recurrence: a retrospective multicenter study in China].","authors":"L X Yang, W L Yang, X Wu, P Zhang, B Zhang, J J Ma, X H Zhang, H R Qian, Y Zhou, T Chen, H Xu, G L Gu, Z D Gao, G Zhai, X F Sun, C Q Jing, H B Qiu, X D Gao, H Cao, M Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240904-00303","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240904-00303","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To investigate the prognosis and the factors that influence it in patients with non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who are at low risk of recurrence. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This was a retrospective cohort study. Clinicopathologic and prognostic data from patients with non-gastric GISTs and at low risk of recurrence (i.e., very low-risk or low-risk according to the 2008 version of the Modified NIH Risk Classification), who attended 18 medical centers in China between January 2000 and June 2023, were collected. We excluded patients with a history of prior malignancy, concurrent primary malignancy, multiple GISTs, and those who had received preoperative imatinib. The study cohort comprised 1,571 patients with GISTs, 370 (23.6%) of whom were at very low-risk and 1,201 (76.4%) at low-risk of recurrence. The cohort included 799 (50.9%) men and 772 (49.1%) women of median age 57 (16-93) years. Patients were followed up to July 2024. The prognosis and its influencing factors were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves for tumor diameter and Ki67 were established, and the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and optimal cut-off value with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Propensity score matching was implemented using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method with a matching tolerance of 0.02. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; With a median follow-up of 63 (12-267) months, the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates of the 1,571 patients were 99.5% and 98.0%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.3% and 94.4%, respectively. During postoperative follow-up, 3.8% (60/1,571) patients had disease recurrence or metastasis, comprising 0.8% (3/370) in the very low-risk group and 4.7% (57/1,201) in the low-risk group. In the low-risk group, recurrence or metastasis occurred in 5.5% (25/457) of patients with duodenal GISTs, 3.9% (25/645) of those with small intestinal GISTs, 9.2% (6/65) of those with rectal GISTs, and 10.0% (1/10) of those with colonic GISTs. Among the 60 patients with metastases, 56.7% (34/60) of the metastases were located in the abdominal cavity, 53.3% (32/60) in the liver, and 3.3% (2/60) in bone. During the follow-up period, 13 patients (0.8%) died of disease. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for tumor diameter and Ki67 and assessed using the Jordon index. This showed that the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.670-0.793, sensitivity 77.7%, specificity 64.1%). Furthermore, the difference in DFS between the two groups was statistically significant when the cutoff value for Ki67 was 5% (AUC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.624-0.762, sensitivity 60.7%, specificity 65.3%). Multifactorial analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥3.5 cm, Ki67 ≥5%, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for DFS in patients with non-gastric GISTs at low ","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1123-1132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Relationship between ripretinib concentration and the prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors in China: a multicenter study]. [瑞瑞替尼浓度与中国晚期胃肠道间质瘤预后的关系:一项多中心研究]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240725-00258
H Xu, X F Sun, H R Qian, M Wang, X Wu, Y Zhou, F Wang, L N Sun, Y Q Wang, F Y Li, Q Zhang, Z K Xu
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prognosis and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal mesenchymal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to analyze the relationship between blood concentrations of this drug and prognosis. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, we investigated the effects of ripretinib in patients with advanced GISTs. The inclusion criteria comprised: (1) daily oral administration of ripretinib scheduled; and (2) uninterrupted treatment for at least 1month, with a stable and relatively fixed daily dosage maintained for a minimum of 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria comprised concurrent use of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors and presence of significant organ dysfunction. We retrospectively identified 79 patients with advanced GISTs who had received ripretinib across seven medical centers, namely Jiangsu Provincial Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, from 1 June 2021 to 31 March 2024. The cohort included 48 men and 31 women, 19 of whom had received ripretinib as second-line, 13 as third-line, and 47 as fourth-line therapy. Two peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from each participant and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry used to determine peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of ripretinib. Machine learning methodologies, specifically the K-nearest neighbor algorithm combined with the Gridsearch CV strategy, were employed to establish the threshold for Cmin. We analyzed adverse reactions, treatment efficacy, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the relationship between drug blood concentration and selected clinical parameters. <b>Results:</b> In the entire cohort, the Cmin and Cmax of ripretinib were 467 ± 360 μg/L and 986 ± 493 μg/L, respectively. Notably, female patients and individuals in the high-dose group exhibited significantly higher values for both Cmin and Cmax (both <i>P</i><0.05). However, variations in drug concentrations associated with the line of ripretinib therapy, treatment efficacy, disease progression, and presence of selected specific genetic mutations were not significantly associated with values of Cmin and Cmax (<i>P</i>>0.05). Among the 79 patients with advanced GISTs receiving ripretinib, reported adverse reactions included alopecia (53, 67.09%), hand-foot syndrome (24, 30.38%), fatigue (22, 27.85%), and myalgia (21, 26.58%). Two patients (2.53%) had grade III complications, both classified as hand-foot syndrome. The correlation between Cmax and adverse reactions was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05). By the time of the latest follow-up, five deaths (6.3%) had occurred within the cohort. The mPFS for the group was 16.3 months, with a mPFS of 14.4 months fo
目的研究瑞培替尼(ripretinib)治疗晚期胃肠间质瘤(GIST)患者的预后和安全性,并分析该药物的血药浓度与预后之间的关系。研究方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了瑞瑞替尼对晚期胃肠间质瘤患者的影响。纳入标准包括:(1) 每天按计划口服瑞瑞替尼;(2) 不间断治疗至少 1 个月,且每日剂量稳定且相对固定,至少维持 2 周。排除标准包括同时使用其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和存在严重器官功能障碍。我们从2021年6月1日至2024年3月31日,在江苏省立医院、江苏省肿瘤医院、南京大学附属鼓楼医院、浙江大学附属邵逸夫医院、上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院和中国人民解放军总医院等7家医疗中心,回顾性地发现了79例接受过瑞瑞替尼治疗的晚期GIST患者。研究对象包括48名男性和31名女性,其中19人接受过瑞瑞替尼二线治疗,13人接受过瑞瑞替尼三线治疗,47人接受过瑞瑞替尼四线治疗。研究人员采集了每位参与者的两份外周静脉血样本,并使用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定了瑞格列替尼的峰值(Cmax)和谷值(Cmin)浓度。我们采用了机器学习方法,特别是 K 近邻算法与 Gridsearch CV 策略相结合,来确定 Cmin 的阈值。我们分析了不良反应、疗效、中位无进展生存期(mPFS)以及药物血药浓度与部分临床参数之间的关系。结果在整个队列中,瑞瑞替尼的Cmin和Cmax分别为467 ± 360 μg/L和986 ± 493 μg/L。值得注意的是,女性患者和高剂量组患者的Cmin和Cmax值明显更高(PP均大于0.05)。在接受瑞瑞替尼治疗的79例晚期GIST患者中,报告的不良反应包括脱发(53例,67.09%)、手足综合征(24例,30.38%)、疲劳(22例,27.85%)和肌痛(21例,26.58%)。两名患者(2.53%)出现了 III 级并发症,均为手足综合征。Cmax与不良反应之间的相关性无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。到最近一次随访时,组群中有五人死亡(6.3%)。该组的 mPFS 为 16.3 个月,其中接受标准剂量治疗的患者的 mPFS 为 14.4 个月,接受递增剂量治疗的患者的 mPFS 为 7.0 个月。在65名接受标准剂量瑞瑞替尼治疗的患者中,Cmin超过450微克/升阈值的患者的mPFS明显更长(18.0个月 vs. 13.7个月;P < 0.05)。结论在中国,晚期GIST患者对瑞瑞替尼表现出明显的耐受性,没有证据表明不良反应与该药的Cmax之间存在相关性。此外,Cmin超过450 μg/L可能与mPFS延长有关。
{"title":"[Relationship between ripretinib concentration and the prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors in China: a multicenter study].","authors":"H Xu, X F Sun, H R Qian, M Wang, X Wu, Y Zhou, F Wang, L N Sun, Y Q Wang, F Y Li, Q Zhang, Z K Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240725-00258","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240725-00258","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To investigate the prognosis and safety of ripretinib in the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal mesenchymal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to analyze the relationship between blood concentrations of this drug and prognosis. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; In this retrospective study, we investigated the effects of ripretinib in patients with advanced GISTs. The inclusion criteria comprised: (1) daily oral administration of ripretinib scheduled; and (2) uninterrupted treatment for at least 1month, with a stable and relatively fixed daily dosage maintained for a minimum of 2 weeks. Exclusion criteria comprised concurrent use of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors and presence of significant organ dysfunction. We retrospectively identified 79 patients with advanced GISTs who had received ripretinib across seven medical centers, namely Jiangsu Provincial Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, from 1 June 2021 to 31 March 2024. The cohort included 48 men and 31 women, 19 of whom had received ripretinib as second-line, 13 as third-line, and 47 as fourth-line therapy. Two peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from each participant and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry used to determine peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of ripretinib. Machine learning methodologies, specifically the K-nearest neighbor algorithm combined with the Gridsearch CV strategy, were employed to establish the threshold for Cmin. We analyzed adverse reactions, treatment efficacy, median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the relationship between drug blood concentration and selected clinical parameters. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; In the entire cohort, the Cmin and Cmax of ripretinib were 467 ± 360 μg/L and 986 ± 493 μg/L, respectively. Notably, female patients and individuals in the high-dose group exhibited significantly higher values for both Cmin and Cmax (both &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05). However, variations in drug concentrations associated with the line of ripretinib therapy, treatment efficacy, disease progression, and presence of selected specific genetic mutations were not significantly associated with values of Cmin and Cmax (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&gt;0.05). Among the 79 patients with advanced GISTs receiving ripretinib, reported adverse reactions included alopecia (53, 67.09%), hand-foot syndrome (24, 30.38%), fatigue (22, 27.85%), and myalgia (21, 26.58%). Two patients (2.53%) had grade III complications, both classified as hand-foot syndrome. The correlation between Cmax and adverse reactions was not statistically significant (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &gt; 0.05). By the time of the latest follow-up, five deaths (6.3%) had occurred within the cohort. The mPFS for the group was 16.3 months, with a mPFS of 14.4 months fo","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1133-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Completely laparoscopic radical treatment of distal gastric cancer through natural orifice specimen extraction surgery: past, present, and future]. [通过自然腔道标本摘取手术对远端胃癌进行完全腹腔镜根治术:过去、现在和未来]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240312-00091
W W Li, D B Ding, R P Liang, H Huang, Y Zhao, B Wei

Gastric cancer is a prevalent malignancy of the digestive system, and traditional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy remains a crucial treatment modality. However, the abdominal wound associated with specimen removal during this procedure conflicts with contemporary concept of minimally invasive surgery. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique that has gained increasing utilization in patients with gastrointestinal tumors, owing to its benefits of reduced wound, accelerated postoperative recovery, and diminished postoperative pain. In recent years, the extensive application of NOSES technology for colorectal cancer in China has provided theoretical support for the minimally invasive treatment of gastric cancer. With the standardization of community health examinations in China, the incidence of early gastric cancer diagnoses is expected to rise, making NOSES surgery the likely future trend in the surgical treatment for early gastric cancer. However, this area remains under-explored both domestically and internationally. This paper aims to synthesize prior literature and review the historical development, current research status, advantages and disadvantages, technical challenges, and future directions of completely laparoscopic radical treatment of distal gastric cancer utilizing NOSES.

胃癌是一种常见的消化系统恶性肿瘤,传统的腹腔镜根治性胃切除术仍是一种重要的治疗方式。然而,这种手术中与标本取出相关的腹部伤口与当代微创手术的理念相冲突。自然孔标本取出术(NOSES)是一种新兴的微创手术技术,由于其具有减少伤口、加快术后恢复和减轻术后疼痛等优点,在胃肠道肿瘤患者中的应用越来越广泛。近年来,NOSES技术在我国结直肠癌的广泛应用,为胃癌的微创治疗提供了理论支持。随着中国社区健康检查的规范化,早期胃癌的诊断率有望上升,NOSES手术可能成为未来早期胃癌外科治疗的趋势。然而,国内外对这一领域的研究仍然不足。本文旨在综合先前的文献,回顾利用NOSES进行全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的历史发展、研究现状、优缺点、技术挑战和未来方向。
{"title":"[Completely laparoscopic radical treatment of distal gastric cancer through natural orifice specimen extraction surgery: past, present, and future].","authors":"W W Li, D B Ding, R P Liang, H Huang, Y Zhao, B Wei","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240312-00091","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240312-00091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a prevalent malignancy of the digestive system, and traditional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy remains a crucial treatment modality. However, the abdominal wound associated with specimen removal during this procedure conflicts with contemporary concept of minimally invasive surgery. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique that has gained increasing utilization in patients with gastrointestinal tumors, owing to its benefits of reduced wound, accelerated postoperative recovery, and diminished postoperative pain. In recent years, the extensive application of NOSES technology for colorectal cancer in China has provided theoretical support for the minimally invasive treatment of gastric cancer. With the standardization of community health examinations in China, the incidence of early gastric cancer diagnoses is expected to rise, making NOSES surgery the likely future trend in the surgical treatment for early gastric cancer. However, this area remains under-explored both domestically and internationally. This paper aims to synthesize prior literature and review the historical development, current research status, advantages and disadvantages, technical challenges, and future directions of completely laparoscopic radical treatment of distal gastric cancer utilizing NOSES.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1172-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Onco-metabolic surgery: the bridge between curative resection of gastric cancer and the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. [肿瘤代谢手术:胃癌根治性切除与 2 型糖尿病缓解之间的桥梁]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231217-00224
L J Cheng, Z P Wu, Y H Qiao, Y S Jiang, L Xiang, L N Wu, B S Guan, H L Tang, S F Huang, J G Yang

The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.

胃癌(GC)与 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)之间的密切关系备受关注。一方面,T2DM 可能在胃癌的发生和发展过程中起作用,并与患者的不良预后相关。另一方面,在 GC 根治术后,T2DM 可得到有效控制,从而改善肿瘤预后。近年来,减肥和代谢手术(BMS)彻底改变了肥胖和超重患者的 T2DM 治疗。对比分析显示,胃癌手术方法与减肥代谢手术方法有相似之处,因此出现了减肥代谢手术(OMS)的概念,即胃癌患者可通过一次手术实现肿瘤根治性切除和 T2DM 缓解。然而,OMS 与 BMS 在目标人群、手术细节和围手术期管理等方面存在明显差异。因此,优化 OMS 概念在 GC 患者中的应用具有重要的临床意义。本文对这一概念进行了综述,以便在实践中更好地实施这一概念。
{"title":"[Onco-metabolic surgery: the bridge between curative resection of gastric cancer and the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus].","authors":"L J Cheng, Z P Wu, Y H Qiao, Y S Jiang, L Xiang, L N Wu, B S Guan, H L Tang, S F Huang, J G Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231217-00224","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231217-00224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 11","pages":"1178-1185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142688710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[A preliminary exploration of reduced port laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF)]. [缩孔腹腔镜近端胃切除术与右侧重叠和单瓣瓣膜成形术(ROSF)的初步探索]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240504-00162
W Peng, Q K Shao, X Y Liang, S C Yan, Q Chen, R Ren, M C Sheng, W T Xu, Y Tian, Y Y Wu

Objective: This study aimed to share preliminary experiences of single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF). Methods: Following the 6th edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, proximal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Using a single-port approach, the esophagus was transected at least 2 cm above the tumor's upper margin with linear staplers. The stomach was then extracted through a periumbilical incision, and the proximal stomach was subsequently transected extracorporeally, while ensuring appropriate resection margins on both the greater and lesser curvatures. A single flap was created before returning the remnant stomach to the abdominal cavity and re-establishing pneumoperitoneum. The No.2 clip was used to grasp and elevate the esophageal stump. An incision was made at the right lower edge of the esophageal stump to guarantee that the esophageal lumen was open. The linear stapler was then inserted into the openings of the stomach and esophagus to perform a side overlap anastomosis with a length of 3 cm. Another barbed suture was used to close the common opening of the esophagus and the stomach, and the same barbed suture were used to suture the gastric wall to the lower edge of the muscle flap. The first barbed suture was then used to sequentially suture the proximal brim of the flap to the esophagus and the right brim of the flap to the right brim of the mucosal window. After completion of anastomosis, a drainage tube was inserted through the right upper port. This procedure was employed from November 2023 to March 2024 on five patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and upper stomach. The cohort consisted of three males and two females, with an age range of 62 to 75 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 13.7 to 24.2 kg/m². All cases were preoperatively staged as T1-2N0M0, confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and enhanced CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Results: All five patients successfully underwent the surgery. The median surgery time was 180-325 minutes, with the intraoperative blood loss of 30-50 ml. The number of lymph nodes harvested ranged from 18 to 27. The time to first flatus, and restore liquid diet and was 2.0-5.0 and 1.0-3.0 days, respectively. The postoperative length of stay was 9.0-11.0 days. The pain scores on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). On the first day, the pain scores were 3.0 in two cases, 2.0 in two cases, and 1.0 in one case. On the second day, the pain scores were 2.0 in two cases and 1.0 in three cases. On the third day, the pain scores were 1.0 in four cases and 2.0 in one case. No short-term postoperative complications were observed, and there were no perioperative deaths. Conclusion: Single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with ROSF is safe and feasible.

目的:本研究旨在分享单切口加双孔腹腔镜近端胃切除术右侧重叠和单瓣瓣膜成形术(ROSF)的初步经验。方法:根据第六版《日本胃癌治疗指南》,进行了近端胃切除术和淋巴结切除术。采用单孔方法,用线性订书机在肿瘤上缘上方至少 2 厘米处横断食管。然后通过脐周切口切除胃,随后在体外横切近端胃,同时确保大弯和小弯的切除边缘适当。在将残胃送回腹腔并重新建立腹腔积气之前,制作了一个单瓣。用 2 号夹子夹住并抬高食管残端。在食管残端右下缘切开一个切口,以确保食管腔是开放的。然后将线性订书机插入胃和食管的开口处,进行长度为 3 厘米的侧边重叠吻合。用另一条带倒钩的缝线缝合食管和胃的共同开口,并用同一条带倒钩的缝线将胃壁缝合到肌瓣下缘。然后用第一条倒钩缝线依次将肌瓣近端边缘与食管缝合,将肌瓣右侧边缘与粘膜窗右侧边缘缝合。吻合完成后,通过右上端口插入引流管。2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,对五名确诊为食管胃交界处和上胃腺癌的患者采用了这一手术。这些患者包括三名男性和两名女性,年龄在62至75岁之间,体重指数(BMI)在13.7至24.2 kg/m²之间。所有病例术前分期均为 T1-2N0M0,并经内镜活检和胸部、腹部和盆腔增强 CT 扫描确认。手术结果五名患者均成功接受了手术。中位手术时间为 180-325 分钟,术中失血量为 30-50 毫升。摘取的淋巴结数量从 18 到 27 个不等。首次排气和恢复流质饮食的时间分别为 2.0-5.0 天和 1.0-3.0 天。术后住院时间为 9.0-11.0 天。数字评分量表(NRS)上的疼痛评分。第一天,疼痛评分为 3.0 分的有 2 例,2.0 分的有 2 例,1.0 分的有 1 例。第二天,疼痛评分为 2.0 分的有 2 例,1.0 分的有 3 例。第三天,疼痛评分为 1.0 分的有 4 例,2.0 分的有 1 例。术后未观察到短期并发症,也没有围手术期死亡病例。结论单切口加双孔腹腔镜近端胃切除术加ROSF是安全可行的。
{"title":"[A preliminary exploration of reduced port laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF)].","authors":"W Peng, Q K Shao, X Y Liang, S C Yan, Q Chen, R Ren, M C Sheng, W T Xu, Y Tian, Y Y Wu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240504-00162","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240504-00162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to share preliminary experiences of single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF). <b>Methods:</b> Following the 6th edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, proximal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Using a single-port approach, the esophagus was transected at least 2 cm above the tumor's upper margin with linear staplers. The stomach was then extracted through a periumbilical incision, and the proximal stomach was subsequently transected extracorporeally, while ensuring appropriate resection margins on both the greater and lesser curvatures. A single flap was created before returning the remnant stomach to the abdominal cavity and re-establishing pneumoperitoneum. The No.2 clip was used to grasp and elevate the esophageal stump. An incision was made at the right lower edge of the esophageal stump to guarantee that the esophageal lumen was open. The linear stapler was then inserted into the openings of the stomach and esophagus to perform a side overlap anastomosis with a length of 3 cm. Another barbed suture was used to close the common opening of the esophagus and the stomach, and the same barbed suture were used to suture the gastric wall to the lower edge of the muscle flap. The first barbed suture was then used to sequentially suture the proximal brim of the flap to the esophagus and the right brim of the flap to the right brim of the mucosal window. After completion of anastomosis, a drainage tube was inserted through the right upper port. This procedure was employed from November 2023 to March 2024 on five patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and upper stomach. The cohort consisted of three males and two females, with an age range of 62 to 75 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 13.7 to 24.2 kg/m². All cases were preoperatively staged as T1-2N0M0, confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and enhanced CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. <b>Results:</b> All five patients successfully underwent the surgery. The median surgery time was 180-325 minutes, with the intraoperative blood loss of 30-50 ml. The number of lymph nodes harvested ranged from 18 to 27. The time to first flatus, and restore liquid diet and was 2.0-5.0 and 1.0-3.0 days, respectively. The postoperative length of stay was 9.0-11.0 days. The pain scores on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). On the first day, the pain scores were 3.0 in two cases, 2.0 in two cases, and 1.0 in one case. On the second day, the pain scores were 2.0 in two cases and 1.0 in three cases. On the third day, the pain scores were 1.0 in four cases and 2.0 in one case. No short-term postoperative complications were observed, and there were no perioperative deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> Single-incision plus two ports laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with ROSF is safe and feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 10","pages":"1069-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142476243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1