首页 > 最新文献

中华胃肠外科杂志最新文献

英文 中文
[Research advances in drug repurposing strategies for synergistic sensitization of colorectal cancer immunotherapy​]. [结直肠癌免疫治疗增效增敏药物再利用策略研究进展]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250623-00236
Z X Fang, G Y Yu, Y Yu, W Zhang

​Colorectal cancer treatment has entered the immunotherapy era. While immunotherapy has markedly improved outcomes for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients, the majority of microsatellite stable (MSS) cases remain unresponsive to immune monotherapy, leading to distinct "cold" and "hot" tumor response states. Transforming "cold tumors" into "hot tumors" is a pivotal research focus. Drug repurposing combined with immunotherapy emerges as a novel strategy that enhances efficacy and reduces adverse effects by repurposing existing drugs, while addressing comorbidities. This approach offers cost-effective and rapid clinical translation. This review systematically explores the potential and challenges of this synergistic approach. In the future, efforts can be focused on initiating prospective studies among the neoadjuvant treatment population, improving drug delivery approaches with the help of materials science, and identifying immune-favorable subgroups. Additionally, considering the characteristics of comorbidity between chronic diseases and colorectal cancer against the backdrop of China's aging society, large-scale multicenter retrospective analyses should be conducted to screen drugs, clarify the interactions between chronic disease medications and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This aims to provide more precise combined treatment guidance for colorectal cancer patients, especially those with comorbid chronic diseases, and help achieve the goals of organ preservation and quality of life improvement for more patients.

结直肠癌的治疗已经进入了免疫治疗时代。虽然免疫疗法显著改善了微卫星不稳定高(MSI-H)患者的预后,但大多数微卫星稳定(MSS)患者对免疫单一疗法仍无反应,导致明显的“冷”和“热”肿瘤反应状态。将“冷肿瘤”转化为“热肿瘤”是一个关键的研究热点。药物再利用联合免疫治疗是一种新的策略,通过对现有药物进行再利用,提高疗效,减少不良反应,同时解决合并症。这种方法提供了成本效益和快速的临床翻译。这篇综述系统地探讨了这种协同方法的潜力和挑战。在未来,努力可以集中在启动新辅助治疗人群的前瞻性研究,在材料科学的帮助下改进药物递送方法,并确定免疫有利亚群。此外,考虑到中国老龄化社会背景下慢性疾病与结直肠癌的合并症特点,需要进行大规模的多中心回顾性分析,筛选药物,明确慢性疾病药物与免疫检查点抑制剂(ici)的相互作用。旨在为结直肠癌患者,特别是合并慢性疾病的结直肠癌患者提供更精准的联合治疗指导,帮助更多患者实现器官保存和改善生活质量的目标。
{"title":"[Research advances in drug repurposing strategies for synergistic sensitization of colorectal cancer immunotherapy​].","authors":"Z X Fang, G Y Yu, Y Yu, W Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250623-00236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250623-00236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>​Colorectal cancer treatment has entered the immunotherapy era. While immunotherapy has markedly improved outcomes for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients, the majority of microsatellite stable (MSS) cases remain unresponsive to immune monotherapy, leading to distinct \"cold\" and \"hot\" tumor response states. Transforming \"cold tumors\" into \"hot tumors\" is a pivotal research focus. Drug repurposing combined with immunotherapy emerges as a novel strategy that enhances efficacy and reduces adverse effects by repurposing existing drugs, while addressing comorbidities. This approach offers cost-effective and rapid clinical translation. This review systematically explores the potential and challenges of this synergistic approach. In the future, efforts can be focused on initiating prospective studies among the neoadjuvant treatment population, improving drug delivery approaches with the help of materials science, and identifying immune-favorable subgroups. Additionally, considering the characteristics of comorbidity between chronic diseases and colorectal cancer against the backdrop of China's aging society, large-scale multicenter retrospective analyses should be conducted to screen drugs, clarify the interactions between chronic disease medications and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This aims to provide more precise combined treatment guidance for colorectal cancer patients, especially those with comorbid chronic diseases, and help achieve the goals of organ preservation and quality of life improvement for more patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1334-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Expert consensus on the comprehensive management of peritoneal metastasis from appendiceal epithelial neoplasms (2025 version)]. 【关于阑尾上皮肿瘤腹膜转移综合治疗的专家共识(2025版)】。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00271

Epithelial tumors of the appendix refer to neoplastic lesions originating from the epithelial tissue of the appendix mucosa. These neoplasms exhibit highly heterogeneous pathological features and biological behavior, which contribute to their strong propensity for peritoneal metastasis. Currently, evidence-based medicine regarding appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and the management of their peritoneal metastasis is limited, leading to a lack of standardized clinical practices. To address this, the Professional Committee of Integrated Rehabilitation for Peritoneal Tumors of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association has organized multidisciplinary experts to focus on key aspects such as the pathological classification of epithelial tumors of the appendix, clinical staging of tumors,the indications for extended resection after local resection, the surgical treatment strategies for concurrent peritoneal metastasis, perioperative rehabilitation, and individualized treatment, while integrating the technical capabilities of relevant specialties. At the same time, it has standardized the perioperative management of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), as well as the clinical application of the pre-rehabilitation system, to enhance the practical operability. Ultimately, the Expert Consensus on the Comprehensive Management of Peritoneal Metastasis from Appendiceal Epithelial Neoplasms (2025 Edition) was developed. This consensus is aimed at further standardizing the systematic diagnosis and treatment process of epithelial tumors of the appendix, thereby reducing the risk of recurrence, improving patient prognosis, and promoting the standardization and homogenization of the diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis from such tumors.

阑尾上皮性肿瘤是指起源于阑尾粘膜上皮组织的肿瘤病变。这些肿瘤表现出高度异质性的病理特征和生物学行为,这有助于它们强烈的腹膜转移倾向。目前,关于阑尾上皮肿瘤及其腹膜转移管理的循证医学有限,导致缺乏标准化的临床实践。为此,中国抗癌协会腹膜肿瘤综合康复专业委员会组织多学科专家就阑尾上皮肿瘤的病理分型、肿瘤的临床分期、局部切除后扩大切除的适应证、并发腹膜转移的手术治疗策略、围手术期康复、个体化治疗等重点方面进行了研讨。同时整合相关专业的技术能力。同时,规范了细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的围手术期管理,以及预康复系统的临床应用,增强了实际可操作性。最终,制定了《阑尾上皮肿瘤腹膜转移综合治疗专家共识(2025版)》。本共识旨在进一步规范阑尾上皮性肿瘤的系统诊断和治疗过程,从而降低复发风险,改善患者预后,促进阑尾上皮性肿瘤腹膜转移诊断和治疗的标准化和同质化。
{"title":"[Expert consensus on the comprehensive management of peritoneal metastasis from appendiceal epithelial neoplasms (2025 version)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00271","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epithelial tumors of the appendix refer to neoplastic lesions originating from the epithelial tissue of the appendix mucosa. These neoplasms exhibit highly heterogeneous pathological features and biological behavior, which contribute to their strong propensity for peritoneal metastasis. Currently, evidence-based medicine regarding appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and the management of their peritoneal metastasis is limited, leading to a lack of standardized clinical practices. To address this, the Professional Committee of Integrated Rehabilitation for Peritoneal Tumors of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association has organized multidisciplinary experts to focus on key aspects such as the pathological classification of epithelial tumors of the appendix, clinical staging of tumors,the indications for extended resection after local resection, the surgical treatment strategies for concurrent peritoneal metastasis, perioperative rehabilitation, and individualized treatment, while integrating the technical capabilities of relevant specialties. At the same time, it has standardized the perioperative management of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), as well as the clinical application of the pre-rehabilitation system, to enhance the practical operability. Ultimately, the Expert Consensus on the Comprehensive Management of Peritoneal Metastasis from Appendiceal Epithelial Neoplasms (2025 Edition) was developed. This consensus is aimed at further standardizing the systematic diagnosis and treatment process of epithelial tumors of the appendix, thereby reducing the risk of recurrence, improving patient prognosis, and promoting the standardization and homogenization of the diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis from such tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1223-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Preservation of left colic artery, suture reinforcement, and transanal tube (PST) technique with selective ileostomy to prevent anastomotic leakage in mid-low rectal cancer surgery]. [保留左结肠动脉、加强缝合、经肛管技术联合选择性回肠造口术预防中低位直肠癌手术吻合口漏]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250331-00131
X Y Zhang, Y C Lu, S Z Zhou, X R Qin, W J Chang

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of the PST technique: Preservation of the left colic artery (P), suture reinforcement (S), and transanal tube (T) combined with selective fecal diversion via end ileostomy, in preventing anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for mid-to-low rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively collected data for this descriptive case series from patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with complete or partial application of the PST technique, some of whom received prophylactic ileostomy, at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, and its Xiamen Branch between July, 2022 and December, 2024. "Partial PST" was defined as the implementation of PS (Preservation of the left colic artery + suture reinforcement), PT (Preservation of the left colic artery + transanal tube), ST (suture reinforcement + transanal tube), or a single T procedure (Transanal tube). The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients who received the PST technique and terminal ileostomy, as well as the incidence of anastomotic leaks. Results: Among 198 patients, 145 received complete PST. Fifty-three patients underwent partial PST (PT) because anastomotic reinforcement was not feasible due to an excessively low anastomosis or obesity. All patients achieved R0 resection. Postoperative pathology showed that 108 patients (54.5%) were at T3-T4 stage, and 81 patients (40.9%) had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous adenocarcinoma. A total of 19.7% (39/198) of patients developed grade II or higher postoperative complications, including 11 cases (5.6%) of surgical site infection and 7 cases (3.5%) of urinary retention. Five patients were rehospitalized within 30 days after surgery, among whom 2 had intestinal obstruction, and 3 developed grade C anastomotic leaks that required reoperation for salvage enterostomy. The overall incidence of anastomotic leakage was 3.0% (6/198). Fifty-three patients (26.8%) received protective ileostomy, with an anastomotic leak incidence of 1.9% (1/53). Methylene blue leakage occurred in 20 patients (10.1%), all of whom received prophylactic ileostomy and had no anastomotic leakage postoperatively. Among 61 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery, 28 underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and none developed anastomotic leaks after surgery. Conclusions: Routine application of the PST technique during laparoscopic low anterior resection, along with prophylactic enterostomy for ultra-high-risk populations, can effectively control the incidence of anastomotic leakage.

目的:评价PST技术:保留左结肠动脉(P)、缝合加固(S)、经肛门管(T)联合回肠末端选择性粪便分流术预防腹腔镜下中低位直肠癌前切除术(LAR)后吻合口漏的疗效。方法:我们回顾性收集了2022年7月至2024年12月在复旦大学附属中山医院结直肠外科及其厦门分院全部或部分应用PST技术的腹腔镜LAR患者的描述性病例系列数据,其中一些患者接受了预防性回肠造口术。“部分PST”定义为实施PS(保存左结肠动脉+缝合加强)、PT(保存左结肠动脉+经肛门管)、ST(缝合加强+经肛门管)或单次T(经肛门管)。主要观察指标为接受PST技术和回肠末端造口术的患者比例,以及吻合口漏的发生率。结果:198例患者中,145例接受了完整的PST治疗。53例患者因吻合度过低或肥胖导致吻合口加固不可行而行部分PST (PT)。所有患者均获得R0切除。术后病理显示T3-T4期108例(54.5%),低分化腺癌或粘液腺癌81例(40.9%)。19.7%(39/198)患者出现II级及以上术后并发症,其中手术部位感染11例(5.6%),尿潴留7例(3.5%)。5例患者术后30天内再次住院,其中2例发生肠梗阻,3例发生C级吻合口漏,需再次行补救性肠造口术。吻合口漏的总发生率为3.0%(6/198)。保护性回肠造口53例(26.8%),吻合口漏发生率为1.9%(1/53)。20例(10.1%)患者发生亚甲蓝漏,均行预防性回肠造口术,术后无吻合口漏。61例术前接受新辅助放化疗的患者中,28例行预防性回肠造口术,术后无吻合口瘘发生。结论:腹腔镜下前低位切除术常规应用PST技术,并对超高危人群进行预防性肠造口,可有效控制吻合口漏的发生。
{"title":"[Preservation of left colic artery, suture reinforcement, and transanal tube (PST) technique with selective ileostomy to prevent anastomotic leakage in mid-low rectal cancer surgery].","authors":"X Y Zhang, Y C Lu, S Z Zhou, X R Qin, W J Chang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250331-00131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250331-00131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the efficacy of the PST technique: Preservation of the left colic artery (P), suture reinforcement (S), and transanal tube (T) combined with selective fecal diversion via end ileostomy, in preventing anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for mid-to-low rectal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively collected data for this descriptive case series from patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with complete or partial application of the PST technique, some of whom received prophylactic ileostomy, at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, and its Xiamen Branch between July, 2022 and December, 2024. \"Partial PST\" was defined as the implementation of PS (Preservation of the left colic artery + suture reinforcement), PT (Preservation of the left colic artery + transanal tube), ST (suture reinforcement + transanal tube), or a single T procedure (Transanal tube). The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients who received the PST technique and terminal ileostomy, as well as the incidence of anastomotic leaks. <b>Results:</b> Among 198 patients, 145 received complete PST. Fifty-three patients underwent partial PST (PT) because anastomotic reinforcement was not feasible due to an excessively low anastomosis or obesity. All patients achieved R0 resection. Postoperative pathology showed that 108 patients (54.5%) were at T3-T4 stage, and 81 patients (40.9%) had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous adenocarcinoma. A total of 19.7% (39/198) of patients developed grade II or higher postoperative complications, including 11 cases (5.6%) of surgical site infection and 7 cases (3.5%) of urinary retention. Five patients were rehospitalized within 30 days after surgery, among whom 2 had intestinal obstruction, and 3 developed grade C anastomotic leaks that required reoperation for salvage enterostomy. The overall incidence of anastomotic leakage was 3.0% (6/198). Fifty-three patients (26.8%) received protective ileostomy, with an anastomotic leak incidence of 1.9% (1/53). Methylene blue leakage occurred in 20 patients (10.1%), all of whom received prophylactic ileostomy and had no anastomotic leakage postoperatively. Among 61 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery, 28 underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and none developed anastomotic leaks after surgery. <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine application of the PST technique during laparoscopic low anterior resection, along with prophylactic enterostomy for ultra-high-risk populations, can effectively control the incidence of anastomotic leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1285-1290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Comparison of the application of double tract anastomosis and single muscular flap valvuloplasty technique in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for digestive tract reconstruction]. [双束吻合与单肌瓣成形术在腹腔镜胃近端切除术消化道重建中的应用比较]
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250925-00357
H S Fan, Q Z Ding, H N Wang, Z Y Cheng, C J Huang, G Y Liu, X J Zhao, X L You
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the clinical efficacy of double tract reconstruction and single flap valvuloplasty technique in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was adopted to analyze the clinical data of 65 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy at Taizhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from July 2019 to April 2024. According to the different reconstruction methods, the patients were divided into the double tract reconstruction group (double tract; <i>n</i>=43) and oblique anastomosis of esophageal-gastric mucosal window with single flap valvuloplasty technique group (single flap <i>n</i>=22). The baseline data, surgical and postoperative recovery indicators, postoperative pathological results, gastroesophageal reflux at postoperative 6 months, and nutritional status at postoperative 1 year were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> Comparisons of operative time, gastrointestinal reconstruction time, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, total protein, plasma albumin, hemoglobin, and lymphocyte count at 1 week postoperatively, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), time to normalization of postoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection or anastomotic leakage between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, compared with the double tract group, the single muscle flap group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (<i>P</i><0.001), higher maximum postoperative body temperature (<i>P</i>=0.004), and a significantly higher proportion of patients with pleural effusion ≥2 cm (<i>P</i>=0.029).No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tumor length, length of esophageal involvement, Siewert classification, tumor differentiation degree, neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, number of metastatic lymph nodes, tumor T stage and N stage, or UICC TNM staging for gastric cancer (all <i>P</i>>0.05). Nevertheless, the minimum distance of the lower resection margin in the double tract group was significantly longer than that in the single muscle flap group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i><0.001). At 6 months postoperatively, results from the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach 22 (QLQ-ST022), Reflux Symptom Index scores, Visick grading, and gastroscopy (Los Angeles classification) all indicated that the incidence of reflux esophagitis in the double tract group was significantly lower than that in the single muscle flap group (all <i>P</i><0.001). Gastrointestinal contrast examination showed no anastomotic stenosis in either group; gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 5 cases (11.6%) in the double tr
目的:探讨腹腔镜下双胃道重建及单瓣瓣成形术在胃近端切除术中的临床疗效。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,分析2019年7月至2024年4月在南京医科大学附属台州市人民医院行胃癌近端根治性切除术的65例胃癌患者的临床资料。根据重建方式的不同,将患者分为双束重建组(n=43)和食管-胃粘膜窗斜吻合单瓣瓣成形术组(n=22)。比较两组患者的基线资料、手术及术后恢复指标、术后病理结果、术后6个月胃食管反流及术后1年营养状况。结果:比较手术时间、胃肠重建时间、清扫淋巴结数、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后1周总蛋白、血浆白蛋白、血红蛋白、淋巴细胞计数、预后营养指数(PNI)、术后白细胞计数、c反应蛋白正常化时间、住院时间、住院费用、两组术后肺部感染、吻合口漏发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但与双束组相比,单肌瓣组术中出血量显著高于双束组(PP=0.004),胸水≥2 cm患者比例显著高于双束组(P=0.029)。两组胃癌在肿瘤长度、食管受侵长度、Siewert分型、肿瘤分化程度、神经侵犯、淋巴血管侵犯、转移淋巴结数量、肿瘤T分期、N分期、UICC TNM分期等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但双束肌瓣组下切缘最小距离明显大于单瓣肌瓣组,两组间差异有统计学意义(PPP=0.469)。胃镜检查结果显示,术后6个月双路组反流性食管炎发生率为9.3%(4/43),单肌瓣组为59.1%(13/22),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ²=18.680,PPP>0.05)。随访1年,各组吻合口复发1例,组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.624)。结论:近端胃切除术联合双束吻合和食管胃粘膜窗斜吻合联合单肌瓣成形术用于消化道重建是安全可行的。而双束吻合能更好地预防术后反流性食管炎的发生,改善患者术后营养状况,提高患者的生活质量。
{"title":"[Comparison of the application of double tract anastomosis and single muscular flap valvuloplasty technique in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for digestive tract reconstruction].","authors":"H S Fan, Q Z Ding, H N Wang, Z Y Cheng, C J Huang, G Y Liu, X J Zhao, X L You","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250925-00357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250925-00357","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To explore the clinical efficacy of double tract reconstruction and single flap valvuloplasty technique in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; A retrospective cohort study was adopted to analyze the clinical data of 65 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy at Taizhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from July 2019 to April 2024. According to the different reconstruction methods, the patients were divided into the double tract reconstruction group (double tract; &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;=43) and oblique anastomosis of esophageal-gastric mucosal window with single flap valvuloplasty technique group (single flap &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;=22). The baseline data, surgical and postoperative recovery indicators, postoperative pathological results, gastroesophageal reflux at postoperative 6 months, and nutritional status at postoperative 1 year were compared between the two groups. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Comparisons of operative time, gastrointestinal reconstruction time, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, total protein, plasma albumin, hemoglobin, and lymphocyte count at 1 week postoperatively, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), time to normalization of postoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection or anastomotic leakage between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&gt;0.05). However, compared with the double tract group, the single muscle flap group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001), higher maximum postoperative body temperature (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.004), and a significantly higher proportion of patients with pleural effusion ≥2 cm (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.029).No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tumor length, length of esophageal involvement, Siewert classification, tumor differentiation degree, neural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, number of metastatic lymph nodes, tumor T stage and N stage, or UICC TNM staging for gastric cancer (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&gt;0.05). Nevertheless, the minimum distance of the lower resection margin in the double tract group was significantly longer than that in the single muscle flap group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). At 6 months postoperatively, results from the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach 22 (QLQ-ST022), Reflux Symptom Index scores, Visick grading, and gastroscopy (Los Angeles classification) all indicated that the incidence of reflux esophagitis in the double tract group was significantly lower than that in the single muscle flap group (all &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). Gastrointestinal contrast examination showed no anastomotic stenosis in either group; gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 5 cases (11.6%) in the double tr","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1291-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Preliminary application of modified interposed jejunal anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction following total laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy]. [改良间置空肠吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃全切术后消化道重建中的初步应用]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250214-00057
Wusiman Laibijiang, Abudukelimu Abulajiang, Yilihamu Yiliyaer, D D Song, Y Shu, W B Zhang

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of modified interposed jejunal anastomosis following total laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Methods: The modification in the digestive tract reconstruction involves transecting the small intestine 2-3 cm below the gastrojejunostomy site and relocating the enteroenterostomy cranially, based on the double-tract anastomosis technique. Specifically, the jejunum and its mesenteric vessels are transected 20-25 cm from the ligament of Treitz. An overlap anastomosis is performed between the esophagus and the distal jejunum, with the common opening closed using a 15 cm barbed suture in a buried manner. A side-to-side gastrojejunostomy is completed under natural anatomical alignment, and the common opening is closed similarly. A side-to-side anastomosis is then created between the small intestine approximately 10 cm below the gastrojejunal anastomosis and the small intestine distal to the ligament of Treitz. Finally, the small intestine is transected 2-3 cm below the gastrojejunal anastomosis without dividing the mesenteric vessels. Results: From April to December 2024, a total of five patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction underwent modified interposed jejunum anastomosis following totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. The median age of the group was 56 (53-74) years, including four males and one female, with a median body mass index of 24 (21-29) kg/m². Three cases were classified as Siewert type II and two as type III. All five patients successfully completed the totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified interposed jejunum anastomosis. The median operative time was 215 (165-240) minutes, the digestive tract reconstruction time was 75 (65-93) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 50 (30-100) ml. The median time to postoperative flatus was 71 (68-88) hours, with no severe complications occurring in any case. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (8-9) days. Within three months after surgery, none of the patients reported reflux symptoms such as acid regurgitation or heartburn. Conclusions: Total laparoscopic modified interposed jejunal anastomosis is safe and feasible, with relatively simple operative steps. It effectively prevents reflux while ensuring the passage of food through the remnant stomach and duodenal loop.

目的:探讨腹腔镜胃近端全切除术后改良空肠间吻合术的可行性和安全性。方法:消化道重建的改良方法是在双道吻合技术的基础上,在胃空肠造口部位下方2 ~ 3cm处横切小肠,将肠肠造口颅脑重新定位。具体来说,空肠及其肠系膜血管在距Treitz韧带20-25厘米处横切。在食管和远端空肠之间进行重叠吻合,用15厘米的倒刺缝线以掩埋的方式闭合共同开口。侧对侧胃空肠吻合术在自然解剖对准下完成,共同开口同样关闭。然后在胃空肠吻合处下方约10厘米处的小肠和Treitz韧带远端的小肠之间进行侧对侧吻合。最后,小肠在胃空肠吻合处下方2-3 cm处横切,不分隔肠系膜血管。结果:2024年4月至12月,新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院全腹腔镜胃近端切除术后,共5例食管胃交界处腺癌患者行改良空肠吻合术。患者年龄中位数为56(53-74)岁,男4名,女1名,体重指数中位数为24 (21-29)kg/m²。siwertⅱ型3例,ⅲ型2例。5例患者均成功完成全腹腔镜下改良空肠吻合术近端胃切除术。手术时间中位数215 (165 ~ 240)min,消化道重建时间中位数75 (65 ~ 93)min,术中出血量50 (30 ~ 100)ml。术后排气量中位数71 (68 ~ 88)h,无严重并发症发生。术后平均住院时间为8(8-9)天。手术后三个月内,没有患者报告反流症状,如胃酸倒流或胃灼热。结论:全腹腔镜改良空肠间插吻合术安全可行,手术步骤相对简单。它有效地防止反流,同时确保食物通过残余胃和十二指肠循环。
{"title":"[Preliminary application of modified interposed jejunal anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction following total laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy].","authors":"Wusiman Laibijiang, Abudukelimu Abulajiang, Yilihamu Yiliyaer, D D Song, Y Shu, W B Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250214-00057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250214-00057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the feasibility and safety of modified interposed jejunal anastomosis following total laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. <b>Methods:</b> The modification in the digestive tract reconstruction involves transecting the small intestine 2-3 cm below the gastrojejunostomy site and relocating the enteroenterostomy cranially, based on the double-tract anastomosis technique. Specifically, the jejunum and its mesenteric vessels are transected 20-25 cm from the ligament of Treitz. An overlap anastomosis is performed between the esophagus and the distal jejunum, with the common opening closed using a 15 cm barbed suture in a buried manner. A side-to-side gastrojejunostomy is completed under natural anatomical alignment, and the common opening is closed similarly. A side-to-side anastomosis is then created between the small intestine approximately 10 cm below the gastrojejunal anastomosis and the small intestine distal to the ligament of Treitz. Finally, the small intestine is transected 2-3 cm below the gastrojejunal anastomosis without dividing the mesenteric vessels. <b>Results:</b> From April to December 2024, a total of five patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction underwent modified interposed jejunum anastomosis following totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. The median age of the group was 56 (53-74) years, including four males and one female, with a median body mass index of 24 (21-29) kg/m². Three cases were classified as Siewert type II and two as type III. All five patients successfully completed the totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified interposed jejunum anastomosis. The median operative time was 215 (165-240) minutes, the digestive tract reconstruction time was 75 (65-93) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 50 (30-100) ml. The median time to postoperative flatus was 71 (68-88) hours, with no severe complications occurring in any case. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (8-9) days. Within three months after surgery, none of the patients reported reflux symptoms such as acid regurgitation or heartburn. <b>Conclusions:</b> Total laparoscopic modified interposed jejunal anastomosis is safe and feasible, with relatively simple operative steps. It effectively prevents reflux while ensuring the passage of food through the remnant stomach and duodenal loop.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1314-1317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[A real-world study of 15,644 patients undergoing D2 radical gastrectomy over 11 years at Shanxi provincial cancer hospital]. [对山西省肿瘤医院11年间15644例D2根治性胃切除术患者的现实研究]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250525-00200
B P Jiao, K Tao, G Zhai, Z F Gao, F Li, K Q Guo, Y T Zhang, N Qiao, Y Jia, Z L Guo, E L Wang, Z Bai, X N Zhao, H R Zhang, Y Y Gao, J F Ma
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To summarize the clinicopathological features, evolving trends in treatment and surgical approaches, and survival outcomes of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital over the past 11 years with the goal of providing a reference for the clinical practice of gastric cancer in this region. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective observational study was conducted to analyze the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for pathologically confirmed gastric malignancy at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January, 2013 to December, 2023. Exclusion criteria consisted of: (1) residual gastric cancer or recurrent gastric cancer after surgery; (2) emergency gastric cancer resection due to bleeding, perforation, obstruction, or other causes; (3) comorbidity with other primary malignant tumors; (4) severe preoperative cardiopulmonary insufficiency or hepatic and renal insufficiency who cannot tolerate radical surgery; and (5) inconsistent main diagnosis information across the medical record system, pathological system, and gastric cancer-specific database. Patients were divided into three groups based on treatment methods: the surgery-only group, the perioperative chemotherapy group, and the adjuvant chemotherapy group. Endpoints included: (1) baseline patient characteristics; (2) trends in tumor location and pathological features; (3) evolution of treatment modalities; and (4) survival outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 15,644 patients were included in the analysis, with 12,591 males and 3,053 females, the male-to-female gender ration was approximately 4∶1; the mean age was (61.2±9.5) years. The tumor sites were mainly concentrated in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (57.4%), followed by the antrum (25.9%). The incidence of EGJ cancer initially rose and then declined. However, gastric antrum tumors remained stable, and gastric body tumors showed a slow upward trend after 2020, accounting for 16.7%. In terms of pathological types, poorly differentiated carcinoma was the most prevalent, accounting for 55.9%, followed by moderately differentiated carcinoma (24.2%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (or signet ring cell carcinoma,14.1%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (4.8%), and well-differentiated carcinoma (0.9%). The proportion of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma showed a significant upward trend overall as well, peaking at 65.6% in 2022 and decreasing to 57.5% in 2023. Mucinous adenocarcinoma (or signet ring cell carcinoma) exhibited fluctuations with a first increase followed by a decrease: it peaked at 17.3% in 2018, dropped sharply to 8.4% in 2022, and rose back to 13.8% in 2023. The proportions of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumors remained stable year by year. In terms of pathological staging, the overall proportions of gastric cancer a
目的:总结近11年来山西省肿瘤医院行胃癌D2根治术患者的临床病理特点、治疗方法及手术方式的演变趋势及生存结局,以期为本地区胃癌的临床实践提供参考。方法:回顾性观察分析2013年1月至2023年12月山西省肿瘤医院胃肠外科因病理证实的胃恶性肿瘤行D2根治性胃切除术患者的临床病理资料。排除标准包括:(1)术后残留胃癌或复发胃癌;(二)因出血、穿孔、梗阻等原因急诊切除胃癌的;(3)与其他原发恶性肿瘤合并症;(4)术前严重心肺功能不全或肝肾功能不全,不能耐受根治性手术者;(5)病案系统、病理系统和胃癌特异性数据库的主要诊断信息不一致。根据治疗方法将患者分为三组:单纯手术组、围手术期化疗组和辅助化疗组。终点包括:(1)基线患者特征;(2)肿瘤位置及病理特征的变化趋势;(3)治疗方式的演变;(4)生存结局。结果:共纳入15644例患者,其中男性12591例,女性3053例,男女性别比约为4∶1;平均年龄(61.2±9.5)岁。肿瘤部位主要集中在食管胃交界处(EGJ)(57.4%),其次是胃窦(25.9%)。EGJ癌的发病率先上升后下降。然而,胃窦肿瘤保持稳定,胃体肿瘤在2020年后呈缓慢上升趋势,占16.7%。从病理类型来看,低分化癌最多,占55.9%,其次是中分化癌(24.2%)、粘液腺癌(或印戒细胞癌,14.1%)、神经内分泌癌(4.8%)和高分化癌(0.9%)。总体而言,低分化腺癌的比例也呈现明显上升趋势,2022年达到65.6%的峰值,2023年降至57.5%。粘液腺癌(或印戒细胞癌)呈现出先上升后下降的波动,2018年达到17.3%的峰值,2022年急剧下降至8.4%,2023年回升至13.8%。高分化腺癌、中分化腺癌和神经内分泌肿瘤的比例逐年保持稳定。从病理分期来看,0期、I期、II期、III期和IVa期胃癌的总体占比分别为0.5%、17.3%、25.1%、54.9%和2.3%。第三阶段的比例在2013年为74.6%,到2023年下降到46.4%。胃癌I期和II期呈上升趋势,占比分别从2013年的10.2%和12.1%上升到2023年的近21.0%和29.6%。2013 - 2023年,单纯接受手术的患者比例持续下降,2023年这一比例降至34.7%。相比之下,接受辅助化疗的患者数量逐年增加,2023年达到54.2%。自2017年以来,围手术期化疗的应用逐渐增加,2023年上升至11.1%。免疫治疗与围手术期化疗几乎同步增长。然而,靶向治疗在一段时间的增长后呈现下降趋势。其中开放手术10704例(68.4%),腹腔镜手术4744例(30.3%),经胸手术193例(1.2%)。病理切缘阳性443例(2.8%),胃癌手术量逐渐增加,在2021年达到高峰,随后逐渐下降。然而,腹腔镜手术的数量并没有减少;相反,它呈现出上升趋势。EGJ肿瘤的主要切除方式为全胃切除术,占78.5%,其次为近端胃切除术,占21.5%。全胃切除术后,食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术为主要吻合方式,近端胃切除术以食管胃吻合术为主,占68.0%。对于胃远端切除术,Billroth II吻合术是最常见的吻合方式,占92.7%。术后并发症总发生率为14.5%(2264 / 15644),其中严重并发症(III-IV级)发生率为4.5%(706/ 15644)。 整个队列随访(47.1±36.8)个月,1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为86.4%、65.9%和58.1%。0期、1期、2期、3期、4期胃腺癌患者的1年总生存率分别为95.7%、98.0%、89.4%、81.0%、49.1%;3年总生存率分别为92.1%、94.6%、81.9%、51.4%和14.7%;5年总生存率分别为89.4%、91.7%、75.1%、41.5%、10.0%。I期、II期、III期和IV期胃神经内分泌癌患者的1年总生存率分别为96.7%、91.1%、73.8%和52.6%;3年总生存率分别为87.2%、69.6%、46.1%、32.1%;5年总生存率分别为87.2%、62.2%、36.7%、32.1%。结论:山西省胃癌以男性为主,食管胃交界处肿瘤发生率高,低分化腺癌比例大,且表现为晚期(以III期为主)。早期胃癌的检出率逐年上升,腹腔镜手术量逐年上升,治疗模式由单一手术向综合治疗转变。
{"title":"[A real-world study of 15,644 patients undergoing D2 radical gastrectomy over 11 years at Shanxi provincial cancer hospital].","authors":"B P Jiao, K Tao, G Zhai, Z F Gao, F Li, K Q Guo, Y T Zhang, N Qiao, Y Jia, Z L Guo, E L Wang, Z Bai, X N Zhao, H R Zhang, Y Y Gao, J F Ma","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250525-00200","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250525-00200","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; To summarize the clinicopathological features, evolving trends in treatment and surgical approaches, and survival outcomes of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital over the past 11 years with the goal of providing a reference for the clinical practice of gastric cancer in this region. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; A retrospective observational study was conducted to analyze the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy for pathologically confirmed gastric malignancy at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from January, 2013 to December, 2023. Exclusion criteria consisted of: (1) residual gastric cancer or recurrent gastric cancer after surgery; (2) emergency gastric cancer resection due to bleeding, perforation, obstruction, or other causes; (3) comorbidity with other primary malignant tumors; (4) severe preoperative cardiopulmonary insufficiency or hepatic and renal insufficiency who cannot tolerate radical surgery; and (5) inconsistent main diagnosis information across the medical record system, pathological system, and gastric cancer-specific database. Patients were divided into three groups based on treatment methods: the surgery-only group, the perioperative chemotherapy group, and the adjuvant chemotherapy group. Endpoints included: (1) baseline patient characteristics; (2) trends in tumor location and pathological features; (3) evolution of treatment modalities; and (4) survival outcomes. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; A total of 15,644 patients were included in the analysis, with 12,591 males and 3,053 females, the male-to-female gender ration was approximately 4∶1; the mean age was (61.2±9.5) years. The tumor sites were mainly concentrated in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (57.4%), followed by the antrum (25.9%). The incidence of EGJ cancer initially rose and then declined. However, gastric antrum tumors remained stable, and gastric body tumors showed a slow upward trend after 2020, accounting for 16.7%. In terms of pathological types, poorly differentiated carcinoma was the most prevalent, accounting for 55.9%, followed by moderately differentiated carcinoma (24.2%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (or signet ring cell carcinoma,14.1%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (4.8%), and well-differentiated carcinoma (0.9%). The proportion of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma showed a significant upward trend overall as well, peaking at 65.6% in 2022 and decreasing to 57.5% in 2023. Mucinous adenocarcinoma (or signet ring cell carcinoma) exhibited fluctuations with a first increase followed by a decrease: it peaked at 17.3% in 2018, dropped sharply to 8.4% in 2022, and rose back to 13.8% in 2023. The proportions of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumors remained stable year by year. In terms of pathological staging, the overall proportions of gastric cancer a","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 11","pages":"1302-1313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Expert consensus on material selection and operative methods for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair]. 【关于腹腔镜裂孔疝修补术材料选择及手术方法的专家共识】。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250715-00268

The incidence of hiatal hernia is on the rise due to population aging and improved awareness of the disease. Laparoscopic repair is the main treatment modality; however, there remains a lack of consensus on the selection of mesh materials and operative specifications. Based on high-level evidence, this expert consensus has formulated 11 recommendations regarding the indications for mesh application, material selection, and operative methods: For patients with giant hiatal hernias (defect area >10 cm², hiatal diameter ≥ 5 cm, or over 1/3 of the gastric body entering the thoracic cavity), complex hernias, recurrent hernias, or those with weak diaphragmatic crura, mesh-reinforced repair is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence. Synthetic meshes are suitable for giant/complex hernias; biological meshes help reduce foreign body reactions; and bioabsorbable synthetic meshes combine mechanical strength with safety. The preferred shape of the mesh is U-shaped, and fixation methods (non-absorbable sutures, absorbable staplers, or medical adhesives) are selected based on hernia size and anatomical features. For suturing the diaphragmatic crura, non-absorbable sutures are recommended, with the choice between interrupted or continuous suturing techniques tailored to patient characteristics. The method of fundoplication is determined according to esophageal pH measurement and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and non-absorbable sutures are recommended for plication.

随着人口老龄化和对裂孔疝认识的提高,裂孔疝的发病率呈上升趋势。腹腔镜修补是主要的治疗方式;然而,在网格材料和操作规范的选择上仍然缺乏共识。专家共识在高水平证据的基础上,就补片应用适应症、材料选择、手术方法等方面提出了11条建议:对于巨大裂孔疝(缺损面积bbb10 cm²,裂孔直径≥5 cm,或胃体超过1/3进入胸腔)、复杂疝、复发疝或膈脚薄弱的患者,建议采用补片强化修补,以降低复发风险。合成网适用于巨大/复杂疝;生物网有助于减少异物反应;生物可吸收合成网结合了机械强度和安全性。网片的首选形状为u形,根据疝的大小和解剖特征选择固定方法(不可吸收缝线、可吸收吻合器或医用粘合剂)。对于膈脚的缝合,建议使用不可吸收的缝合线,并根据患者的特点选择间断缝合或连续缝合技术。根据食管pH值测定和食管下括约肌压力确定吻合方法,建议采用不可吸收缝合线进行吻合。
{"title":"[Expert consensus on material selection and operative methods for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250715-00268","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250715-00268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of hiatal hernia is on the rise due to population aging and improved awareness of the disease. Laparoscopic repair is the main treatment modality; however, there remains a lack of consensus on the selection of mesh materials and operative specifications. Based on high-level evidence, this expert consensus has formulated 11 recommendations regarding the indications for mesh application, material selection, and operative methods: For patients with giant hiatal hernias (defect area >10 cm², hiatal diameter ≥ 5 cm, or over 1/3 of the gastric body entering the thoracic cavity), complex hernias, recurrent hernias, or those with weak diaphragmatic crura, mesh-reinforced repair is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence. Synthetic meshes are suitable for giant/complex hernias; biological meshes help reduce foreign body reactions; and bioabsorbable synthetic meshes combine mechanical strength with safety. The preferred shape of the mesh is U-shaped, and fixation methods (non-absorbable sutures, absorbable staplers, or medical adhesives) are selected based on hernia size and anatomical features. For suturing the diaphragmatic crura, non-absorbable sutures are recommended, with the choice between interrupted or continuous suturing techniques tailored to patient characteristics. The method of fundoplication is determined according to esophageal pH measurement and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and non-absorbable sutures are recommended for plication.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 10","pages":"1087-1095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145373161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients with mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer (2025 edition)]. 【专家共识:错配修复熟练/微卫星稳定的局部晚期直肠癌患者短期放疗后化疗联合免疫治疗新辅助治疗(2025年版)】。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250727-00283

Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, with more than half of patients diagnosed at the locally advanced stage. Currently, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) primarily involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the neoadjuvant treatment landscape for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) rectal cancer. However, most rectal cancer patients exhibit mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) status and show poor responsiveness to immunotherapy. In recent years, multiple studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and immunotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate in pMMR/MSS LARC patients. Nevertheless, controversies persist regarding patient selection, efficacy evaluation, adverse event management, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and follow-up strategies. Considering the Colorectal Surgery Group of the Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, in collaboration with the Colorectal and Anal Surgery Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association, the Chinese Colorectal Cancer Clinical Research Collaborative Group, and related experts, has developed this consensus document by referencing domestic and international research advancements. The aim is to provide standardized guidance for the clinical application of this treatment approach.

直肠癌是中国最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,超过一半的患者在局部晚期被诊断出来。目前,局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗主要包括新辅助放化疗和根治性手术。免疫检查点抑制剂的出现彻底改变了错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定性高(dMMR/MSI-H)直肠癌的新辅助治疗领域。然而,大多数直肠癌患者表现出错配修复熟练/微卫星稳定(pMMR/MSS)状态,对免疫治疗的反应性较差。近年来,多项研究表明,在pMMR/MSS LARC患者中,新辅助短期放疗加化疗和免疫治疗可提高病理完全缓解率。然而,在患者选择、疗效评价、不良事件管理、术后辅助治疗和随访策略等方面仍存在争议。考虑到中华医学会外科学分会大肠癌手术组,与中国研究型医院协会大肠癌肛肠外科专业委员会、中国大肠癌临床研究协作组及相关专家,在参考国内外研究进展的基础上,共同制定了本共识文件。目的是为这种治疗方法的临床应用提供标准化的指导。
{"title":"[Expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients with mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer (2025 edition)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250727-00283","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250727-00283","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, with more than half of patients diagnosed at the locally advanced stage. Currently, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) primarily involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the neoadjuvant treatment landscape for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) rectal cancer. However, most rectal cancer patients exhibit mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) status and show poor responsiveness to immunotherapy. In recent years, multiple studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and immunotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate in pMMR/MSS LARC patients. Nevertheless, controversies persist regarding patient selection, efficacy evaluation, adverse event management, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and follow-up strategies. Considering the Colorectal Surgery Group of the Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, in collaboration with the Colorectal and Anal Surgery Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association, the Chinese Colorectal Cancer Clinical Research Collaborative Group, and related experts, has developed this consensus document by referencing domestic and international research advancements. The aim is to provide standardized guidance for the clinical application of this treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 10","pages":"1096-1104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145373125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Advances and controversies in surgical techniques for gastroesophageal reflux disease]. [胃食管反流病手术技术的进展与争议]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250709-00256
J M Wu, D Chen

The surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease began in the mid-20th century and has undergone a revolutionary shift from open procedures to laparoscopic techniques. Its core objective remains focused on reconstructing an effective anti-reflux barrier while minimizing surgical complications. With technological advancements and the accumulation of follow-up data, controversies surrounding key technical aspects have emerged, significantly affecting clinical decision-making. This article systematically reviews the evolution of surgical anti-reflux techniques, focuses on current critical controversies, and explores future directions by integrating evidence-based medicine with clinical experience.

胃食管反流病的外科治疗始于20世纪中期,经历了从开放手术到腹腔镜技术的革命性转变。其核心目标仍然集中在重建有效的抗反流屏障,同时尽量减少手术并发症。随着技术的进步和随访数据的积累,围绕关键技术方面的争议已经出现,严重影响临床决策。本文系统回顾了外科抗反流技术的发展,重点介绍了当前的关键争议,并通过将循证医学与临床经验相结合,探讨了未来的发展方向。
{"title":"[Advances and controversies in surgical techniques for gastroesophageal reflux disease].","authors":"J M Wu, D Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250709-00256","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250709-00256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease began in the mid-20<sup>th</sup> century and has undergone a revolutionary shift from open procedures to laparoscopic techniques. Its core objective remains focused on reconstructing an effective anti-reflux barrier while minimizing surgical complications. With technological advancements and the accumulation of follow-up data, controversies surrounding key technical aspects have emerged, significantly affecting clinical decision-making. This article systematically reviews the evolution of surgical anti-reflux techniques, focuses on current critical controversies, and explores future directions by integrating evidence-based medicine with clinical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 10","pages":"1123-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145373091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Safety and efficacy of different anastomotic techniques following proximal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis]. [近端胃切除术后不同吻合技术的安全性和有效性:荟萃分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00273
D Y Song, Z H Wang, J Wang, J J Zhang, S S Li, K Zhang, G H Gao, W Q Hu
<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis compares the postoperative outcomes of the double-flap technique (DFT) versus esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal interposition (JI), double-tract reconstruction (DTR), and gastric tube anastomosis (GTA) following proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Prospective and retrospective studies published from database inception until June 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. Studies reporting at least one predefined outcome with extractable data were included. Outcomes of interest consisted of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux, overall postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and digestive reconstruction time. Two investigators independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated with the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool, retrospective cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and single-arm studies with the JBI critical appraisal tool. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratios (RRs), and continuous variables were summarized with standardized mean differences (SMDs), using fixed- or random-effects models based on I² statistics. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger's test. <b>Results:</b> A total of 55 studies published between 2007 and 2025 were included, comprising 5 RCTs and 50 retrospective studies. Among 4,380 patients, 732 underwent EG, 454 GTA, 1,480 DTR, 468 JI, and 1,246 DFT. Quality assessment indicated that all except six retrospective cohort studies (rated as moderate quality) were of high quality or had low risk of bias. Among the five reconstruction methods, DFT showed the lowest incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (6.6%, 82/1,246) and overall postoperative complications (11.6%, 144/1,246). JI had the lowest rate of anastomotic leakage (1.3%, 6/468), followed by DFT (1.4%, 18/1,246), and DTR had the lowest rate of anastomotic stenosis (2.4%, 36/1,480), followed by DFT (7.5%, 94/1,246). DFT required the longest operative time for reconstruction ([141.2 ± 597.6] minutes), and DTR required the shortest ([50.1 ± 39.0] minutes). Compared to EG, DFT was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastroesophageal reflux (RR=0.13 ,95%CI: 0.03-0.55, <i>P</i> = 0.01), and no significant differences were observed in overall complications (RR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.55-1.74, <i>P</i> = 0.93), anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.04-18.43, <i>P</i> = 0.90), or anastomotic stenosis (RR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.09-6.39, <i>P</i> = 0.79). Compared to JI, DFT showed no significant differences in gastroesophageal reflux (RR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.25, <i>P</i>=0.11), overall complications (RR=2.06, 95%CI: 0.30-14.11, <i>P</i>=0.46), anastomotic leakage (RR=2.05, 95%CI: 0.26-16.18, <i>P</i>=0.49), or anastomotic stenosis (RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.10-7.17, <i>P</i>=0.87). Similarly, compared to DTR, DFT had a lower
目的:本荟萃分析比较双瓣技术(DFT)与食管胃吻合(EG)、空肠间置(JI)、双束重建(DTR)和胃管吻合(GTA)在胃癌近端胃切除术后的术后效果。方法:从PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、CNKI和万方数据库中检索从数据库建立到2025年6月发表的前瞻性和回顾性研究。研究报告了至少一个预定义的结果和可提取的数据。研究结果包括胃食管反流发生率、总体术后并发症、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄和消化重建时间。两名研究者独立进行文献筛选、数据提取和质量评估。随机对照试验(rct)采用Cochrane ROB 2.0工具进行评价,回顾性队列研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS),单组研究采用JBI关键评价工具。使用风险比(rr)对二分类结果进行汇总,使用基于I²统计量的固定或随机效应模型对连续变量进行标准化平均差异(SMDs)汇总。通过漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。结果:共纳入了2007 - 2025年间发表的55项研究,包括5项随机对照试验和50项回顾性研究。在4380例患者中,732例接受EG, 454例接受GTA, 1480例接受DTR, 468例接受JI, 1246例接受DFT。质量评估表明,除了6项回顾性队列研究(被评为中等质量)外,所有研究均为高质量或低偏倚风险。5种重建方法中,DFT的胃食管反流发生率最低(6.6%,82/ 1246),术后总并发症发生率最低(11.6%,144/ 1246)。JI组吻合口漏发生率最低(1.3%,6/468),DFT组次之(1.4%,18/ 1246),DTR组吻合口狭窄发生率最低(2.4%,36/ 1480),DFT组次之(7.5%,94/ 1246)。DFT重建所需手术时间最长([141.2±597.6]min), DTR重建所需时间最短([50.1±39.0]min)。与EG相比,DFT与胃食管反流风险显著降低相关(RR=0.13,95%CI: 0.03 ~ 0.55, P = 0.01),总并发症(RR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.55 ~ 1.74, P = 0.93)、吻合口漏(RR= 0.81, 95%CI: 0.04 ~ 18.43, P = 0.90)、吻合口狭窄(RR= 0.75, 95%CI: 0.09 ~ 6.39, P = 0.79)无显著差异。与JI相比,DFT在胃食管反流(RR= 0.36, 95%CI: 0.10 ~ 1.25, P=0.11)、总并发症(RR=2.06, 95%CI: 0.30 ~ 14.11, P=0.46)、吻合口漏(RR=2.05, 95%CI: 0.26 ~ 16.18, P=0.49)、吻合口狭窄(RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.10 ~ 7.17, P=0.87)方面无显著差异。与DTR相比,DFT的总并发症风险较低(RR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.50 ~ 0.98, P=0.04),但重建时间较长(SMD: 2.55, 95%CI: 0.31 ~ 4.79, P=0.03)。胃食管反流(RR= 0.68, 95%CI: 0.35 ~ 1.30, P=0.24)、吻合口漏(RR=0.59, 95%CI: 0.16 ~ 2.17, P=0.43)、吻合口狭窄(RR=2.44, 95%CI: 0.44 ~ 13.64, P=0.31)两组间无显著差异。与GTA相比,DFT与胃食管反流的风险显著降低相关(RR= 0.53, 95%CI: 0.33-0.88, P=0.01),但在总并发症(RR= 0.69, 95%CI: 0.41-1.16, P=0.16)、吻合口漏(RR= 0.25, 95%CI: 0.03-2.14, P=0.21)或吻合口狭窄(RR=0.65, 95%CI: 0.24-1.76, P=0.40)方面也无显著差异。分析中未发现显著的发表偏倚(Egger检验P < 0.05)。结论:在胃近端切除术后常见的5种吻合方式中,DFT抗胃食管反流效果较好,尤其在预防胃食管反流方面优于EG和GTA。与DTR相比,DFT也显示出较低的总体并发症风险,但与其他技术相比,DFT保持吻合口安全性。
{"title":"[Safety and efficacy of different anastomotic techniques following proximal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis].","authors":"D Y Song, Z H Wang, J Wang, J J Zhang, S S Li, K Zhang, G H Gao, W Q Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00273","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250718-00273","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Objective:&lt;/b&gt; This meta-analysis compares the postoperative outcomes of the double-flap technique (DFT) versus esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal interposition (JI), double-tract reconstruction (DTR), and gastric tube anastomosis (GTA) following proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Prospective and retrospective studies published from database inception until June 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. Studies reporting at least one predefined outcome with extractable data were included. Outcomes of interest consisted of incidence of gastroesophageal reflux, overall postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and digestive reconstruction time. Two investigators independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated with the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool, retrospective cohort studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and single-arm studies with the JBI critical appraisal tool. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratios (RRs), and continuous variables were summarized with standardized mean differences (SMDs), using fixed- or random-effects models based on I² statistics. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger's test. &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; A total of 55 studies published between 2007 and 2025 were included, comprising 5 RCTs and 50 retrospective studies. Among 4,380 patients, 732 underwent EG, 454 GTA, 1,480 DTR, 468 JI, and 1,246 DFT. Quality assessment indicated that all except six retrospective cohort studies (rated as moderate quality) were of high quality or had low risk of bias. Among the five reconstruction methods, DFT showed the lowest incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (6.6%, 82/1,246) and overall postoperative complications (11.6%, 144/1,246). JI had the lowest rate of anastomotic leakage (1.3%, 6/468), followed by DFT (1.4%, 18/1,246), and DTR had the lowest rate of anastomotic stenosis (2.4%, 36/1,480), followed by DFT (7.5%, 94/1,246). DFT required the longest operative time for reconstruction ([141.2 ± 597.6] minutes), and DTR required the shortest ([50.1 ± 39.0] minutes). Compared to EG, DFT was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastroesophageal reflux (RR=0.13 ,95%CI: 0.03-0.55, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01), and no significant differences were observed in overall complications (RR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.55-1.74, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.93), anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.04-18.43, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.90), or anastomotic stenosis (RR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.09-6.39, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.79). Compared to JI, DFT showed no significant differences in gastroesophageal reflux (RR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.25, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.11), overall complications (RR=2.06, 95%CI: 0.30-14.11, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.46), anastomotic leakage (RR=2.05, 95%CI: 0.26-16.18, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.49), or anastomotic stenosis (RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.10-7.17, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;=0.87). Similarly, compared to DTR, DFT had a lower ","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 10","pages":"1179-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145373180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1