中华胃肠外科杂志最新文献

Morbid obesity and its accompanying diseases have become one of the most serious public health problems warranting global effort and bariatric and metabolic surgery is still the most effective method for long-term weight control. Among all bariatric and metabolic procedures, sleeve gastrectomy is currently the most widely used, but it is not a perfect procedure. One of the most serious issues that this surgical procedure faces is the possibility of worsening existing or developing de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after surgery. Moreover, there is currently a lack of high-level clinical trial evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Therefore, initiated by four domestic bariatric and metabolic surgery centers, 41 experts with rich experience in bariatric and metabolic surgery and diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease from China, Japan, and South Korea reached a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in sleeve gastrectomy patients using the Delphi method. There are a total of 59 consultation questions in this consensus, of which 44 have reached a consensus. We hope that this consensus can not only serve as a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment, but also provide more possible directions for future high-quality clinical research.

This study elaborates the essence of distant lymph node metastasis and skip metastasis of esophageal cancer according to the membrane anatomy theory. Lymph distant metastasis of esophageal cancer is essentially the phenomenon of cancer cells shedding from the primary focus of esophageal cancer and transferring along the direction of lymphatic drainage to the root of the esophageal mesentery. Because the metastasis is relatively distant, it is called distant metastasis. Despite the long distance, this metastasis is still limited to the envelope-like-membrane structure of the esophageal mesentery and belongs to the category of mesangial carcinoma. The lymph node skip metastasis of esophageal cancer refers to the process in which esophageal cancer cells detach from the primary lesion and migrate along the lymphatic drainage direction within the envelope-like-membrane structure of the mesentery to the central lymph nodes at the root of the mesentery. During this metastatic process, the surrounding mesenteric lymph nodes which are tightly attached to the esophagus will not be affected by cancer metastasis because of the isolation barrier effect of the envelope-like membrane structure of the esophageal mesentery. Applying the theory of membrane anatomy to esophageal cancer radical surgery will make the surgery more scientific, reasonable, and standardized, and is expected to achieve dual benefits of both surgical and oncological effects in esophageal cancer radical surgery.

Objective: To investigate clinical efficacy of parasacral perforator flap (PPF) on postoperative wound healing in pilonidal sinus diseases (PSDs). Methods: The surgery steps were as follows: (1) To preoperatively detect parasacral perforator arteries with the handhold Doppler probe and mark them; (2) To remove the infected and necrotic tissues of PSDs completely; (3) To design the PPF according to the wound size and the parasacral perforator arteries' localization; (4) To harvest the flap from the gluteus maximus muscle surface and transfer it to the wound without tension. Several data were documented, including surgical duration, flap length, flap width, drainage tube placement duration, hospital stay, duration from operation to stitch removal, postsurgical complications and recurrence. Results: There were six patients with PSDs whose postoperative wound healing was repaired by PPF, admitted in our department from March 2021 to March 2023. Of them, five were male and one was female. Their median age was 24 (range: 18-33) years old. Their median surgical duration was 165 (range: 134-207) minutes, median length of PPF was 8 (range: 7-11) cm, median width of PPF was 3 (range: 3-4) cm, mean duration of drainage tube placement was 8 (range: 4-17) days, mean hospital stay was 13 (range: 6-23) days, mean duration from operation to stitch removal was 14 (range: 14-17) days, median follow-up time was 6-16 months. Incisions of all six cases achieved first-intention healing without early- or late-stage complications. No recurrence occurred during follow-up. All patients involved were satisfied with their clinical efficacy. Conclusion: The utility of PPF in postoperative wound healing of PPDs was effective, safe and reliable.

The ligamentous structures integral to the surgical management of colon cancer include the gastrocolic ligament, the phrenicocolic ligament, and the splenocolic ligament. Historically, the era of conventional open surgery was characterized by the use of large forceps for clamping and ligating these ligaments. However, the advent of fascial and mesenteric anatomy research has ushered in a paradigm shift. Aided by high-definition laparoscopy, colorectal surgeons have progressively clarified the fundamental anatomical structures, thereby refining surgical techniques in accordance with fascial and mesenteric anatomical principles. This study synthesizes the author's anatomical research findings to dissect the fascial and mesenteric anatomy of the ligaments pertinent to colon cancer surgery, thereby exploring their implications for surgical practice and oncological outcomes. The gastrocolic ligament exhibits distinct fascial and mesenteric anatomical configurations within the omental sac and extra-omental regions. Within the omental sac, the sub-omental arch pathway emerges as a viable alternative to the paracolic approach for accessing the omental sac through the gastrocolic ligament. Conversely, in the extra-omental region, the incision of the greater omentum overlaying the space between the mesogastrium and the transverse mesocolon represents a mesenteric bridge facilitating access to this area. The incidence of nodal metastasis in the gastrocolic ligament associated with transverse colon and hepatic flexure colon cancer is notably low; nevertheless, selective dissection in high-risk patients can still provide survival benefits. The splenocolic ligament is formed by the convergence of the splenic hilum region of the mesogastrium (including the pancreatic mesentery) with the mesocolon of the splenic flexure of the colon. A natural avascular plane exists within it, and dissection along this plane can avoid encountering the branches of the left gastroepiploic artery that are typically encountered in traditional dissection routes. To date, there is no compelling evidence advocating for the resection of the splenic hilum region of the mesogastrium or the lymph nodes of the gastrocolic ligament in the context of splenic flexure colon cancer.

The concept of mesenteric anatomy has been evolving in cognition. With the continuous development of endoscopic techniques, the submicroscopic structures of many mesenteries have been gradually understood, ultimately confirming the ubiquitous presence of mesenteries in the digestive organs. Based on various domestic and foreign mesenteric anatomical theories and combined with years of clinical practice, we have summarized and proposed a new concept and theory-vascular-guided complete mesenteric resection for gastric cancer. The theoretical basis is that, from the perspective of the embryonic development of the digestive tract, the rotation of the digestive tract and its associated mesentery is always centered on blood vessels. Therefore, the supply vessels and digestive tracts and their associated mesentery are naturally connected. The mesentery is a complex structure that encompasses blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatic tissues. The blood vessels serve as the boundary of the mesentery, ensuring that the lymphatic network that drains the tumor is maximally resected. This article focuses on the complete mesenteric resection margins in gastric cancer surgery, that is, the lateral boundary of the mesentery as the vascular-supplied guided resection boundary and its mesentery, and the base boundary as the mesenteric bed. Using precise vascular guidance to define the extent of mesenteric resection will help accurately define the mesenteric margin during radical resection for different stages of gastric cancer.

The incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma is increasing gradually. The surgical procedures mainly include radical resection of the primary tumor, lymph node dissection, and digestive tract reconstruction. Due to the special anatomical location of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, the pattern of lymph node metastasis is not clear, and regional lymph nodes dissection especially in the lower mediastinum is still controversial, and awaits further high-quality evidence. Meanwhile, due to the special anatomical location of the lower mediastinum, it is often difficult to perform lower mediastinal lymph node dissection. How to complete the lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection more safely and effectively is the key point for gastric cancer surgeons. In this paper, the progress, consensus, and controversy on the extent of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection in patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were discussed. Based on our own experience, the current clinically techniques for lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection were summarized to further improve the quality control of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissection in patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.