Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209
B Ke, H Liang
Numerous studies have confirmed that D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Standardized lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in ensuring surgical quality and efficacy. It is recommended to perform D2 lymph node dissection according to the 6th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. For lymph nodes beyond the scope of D2 lymph node dissection, such as No.10, 13, 14v, 16 and mediastinal lymph nodes, selective D2+ lymph node dissection can be performed, which may be advantageous for some patients. Currently, omentectomy is the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical significance of gastrectomy with preservation of the greater omentum requires further validation through large-scale clinical trials. Standardized ex vivo lymph node dissection is important for accurate postoperative staging, and it is recommended to harvest more than 30 lymph nodes to avoid staging deviation.
{"title":"[Quality control of lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"B Ke, H Liang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have confirmed that D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Standardized lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in ensuring surgical quality and efficacy. It is recommended to perform D2 lymph node dissection according to the 6th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. For lymph nodes beyond the scope of D2 lymph node dissection, such as No.10, 13, 14v, 16 and mediastinal lymph nodes, selective D2+ lymph node dissection can be performed, which may be advantageous for some patients. Currently, omentectomy is the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical significance of gastrectomy with preservation of the greater omentum requires further validation through large-scale clinical trials. Standardized <i>ex vivo</i> lymph node dissection is important for accurate postoperative staging, and it is recommended to harvest more than 30 lymph nodes to avoid staging deviation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222
H L Zheng, L H Wei, J Lu, C M Huang
After nearly 30 years of exploration and practice, minimally invasive surgical techniques represented by laparoscopic technology have become an important means for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. In China, laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer has been extensively carried out. However, there are still controversies regarding the gastric resection range and methods for advanced gastric cancer. By reviewing relevant domestic and foreign guideline documents and combining team practice experience, this article elaborates on the key points of quality control of laparoscopic gastric resection range for locally advanced gastric cancer from aspects such as tumor localization and gastric resection range for upper, middle and lower gastric tumors. It aims to provide reference for carrying out and promoting laparoscopic radical gastrectomy more safely.
{"title":"[Quality control of gastric resection range in laparoscopic locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"H L Zheng, L H Wei, J Lu, C M Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After nearly 30 years of exploration and practice, minimally invasive surgical techniques represented by laparoscopic technology have become an important means for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. In China, laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer has been extensively carried out. However, there are still controversies regarding the gastric resection range and methods for advanced gastric cancer. By reviewing relevant domestic and foreign guideline documents and combining team practice experience, this article elaborates on the key points of quality control of laparoscopic gastric resection range for locally advanced gastric cancer from aspects such as tumor localization and gastric resection range for upper, middle and lower gastric tumors. It aims to provide reference for carrying out and promoting laparoscopic radical gastrectomy more safely.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214
K Liu, Y F Zhu, Y S Yang, L Q Chen, J K Hu
Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.
食管胃交界腺癌(AEG)因其解剖位置的特殊性,在定义、分期、治疗策略等方面一直存在争议和分歧。2018年9月,《中国食管胃交界腺癌外科治疗专家共识(2018版)》发布,为统一中国胸外科和普外科医生对AEG的外科治疗策略起到了开创性作用。近五年来,关于AEG的多项临床研究成果不断涌现,为关键手术治疗策略的选择提供了新的临床依据。因此,为了进一步规范中国 AEG 的外科治疗,包括 25 位胃肠外科医生和 24 位胸外科医生在内的中国专家组成员于 2024 年发布了《中国食管胃交界腺癌外科治疗中国专家共识(2024 版)》。该共识以近5年最高水平的临床研究证据为基础,最终就AEG手术治疗的热点和重点提出了29条建议,并总结了5个尚待进一步探讨的问题。本综述将对该共识中提出的建议进行总结和详细解读。
{"title":"[Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition)].","authors":"K Liu, Y F Zhu, Y S Yang, L Q Chen, J K Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155
Z K Xu, L J Wang, F Y Li, H Ge
With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.
{"title":"[Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy].","authors":"Z K Xu, L J Wang, F Y Li, H Ge","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the \"Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)\", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"153-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153
Z Z Zhang, C C Zhu, H Cao
With the developing technique of the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer, the quality of early gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment is coming into focus, and is crucial to improve the overall management of gastric cancer. It is necessary to establish a quality control system to ensure the quality of diagnosis and treatment for EGC. Based on the summary of the diagnosis and treatment status and technological progress of early gastric cancer, this paper proposes the quality control strategy, content and plan for the diagnosis and treatment process of EGC from the aspects of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment, clinical diagnosis technology, endoscopic and surgical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up, with a view to expound the rationality, standardization and quality guarantee of the diagnosis and treatment process for early gastric cancer.
{"title":"[Thinking and strategy selection on the quality control of early gastric cancer].","authors":"Z Z Zhang, C C Zhu, H Cao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the developing technique of the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer, the quality of early gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment is coming into focus, and is crucial to improve the overall management of gastric cancer. It is necessary to establish a quality control system to ensure the quality of diagnosis and treatment for EGC. Based on the summary of the diagnosis and treatment status and technological progress of early gastric cancer, this paper proposes the quality control strategy, content and plan for the diagnosis and treatment process of EGC from the aspects of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment, clinical diagnosis technology, endoscopic and surgical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up, with a view to expound the rationality, standardization and quality guarantee of the diagnosis and treatment process for early gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121
B Zhang, G L Zheng, Y Zhang, Y Zhao, H T Zhu, T Zhang, Y Liu, Z C Zheng
Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of (micro)metastasis in No.12b lymph node in patients with gastric antrum cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 242 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis, complete follow-up data, and no preoperative anti-tumor therapy or history of other malignancies. All study patients had undergone radical gastrectomy (at least D2 radical range) + No.12b lymph node dissection in the Department of Gastric Surgery of Liaoning Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2012. Immunohistochemical staining with antibody CK8/18 was used to detect micrometastasis to lymph nodes. Patients with positive findings on hematoxylin and eosin stained specimens and/or CK8/18 positivity in No.12b lymph node were diagnosed as having No.12b (micro)metastasis and included in the No.12b positive group. All other patients were classified as 12b negative. We investigated the impact of No.12b (micro)metastasis by comparing the clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence free survival (RFS) of these two groups of patients and subjecting possible risk factors to statistical analysis. Results: Traditional hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that 15/242 patients were positive for No.12b lymph nodes and 227 were negative. A total of 241 negative No. 12b lymph nodes were detected. Immunohistochemical testing revealed that seven of these 241 No.12b lymph nodes (2.9%) were positive for micrometastasis. A further seven positive nodes were identified among the 227 nodes (3.1%) that had been evaluated as negative on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Thus, 22 /242 patients' (9.1%) No.12b nodes were positive for micrometastases, the remaining 220 (90.9%) being negative. Factor analysis showed that No.12b lymph node (micro) metastasis is associated with more severe invasion of the gastric serosa (HR=3.873, 95%CI: 1.676-21.643, P=0.006), T3 stage (HR=1.615, 95%CI: 1.113-1.867, P=0.045), higher N stage (HR=1.768, 95%CI: 1.187-5.654, P=0.019), phase III of TNM stage (HR=2.129, 95%CI: 1.102-3.475, P=0.046), and lymph node metastasis in the No.1/No.8a/No.12a groups (HR=0.451, 95%CI: 0.121-0.552, P=0.035; HR=0.645, 95%CI:0.071-0.886, P=0.032; HR=1.512, 95%CI: 1.381-2.100, P=0.029, respectively). Survival analysis showed that the 5-year RFS of patients in the No.12b positive group was worse than that of those in the No.12b negative group (18.2% vs. 34.5%, P<0.001). Independent predictors of RFS were poorer differentiation of the primary tumor (HR=0.528, 95%CI:0.288-0.969, P=0.039), more severe serous invasion (HR=1.262, 95%CI:1.039-1.534, P=0.019), higher T/N/TNM stage (HR=4.880, 95%CI: 1.909-12.476, P<0.001; HR=2.332, 95%CI: 1.640-3.317, P<0.001; HR=0.139, 95%CI: 0.027-0.713, P=0.018, respectively), and lymph node metastasis in the No.12a/No.1
{"title":"[Clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of No.12b lymph node metastasis in gastric antrum cancer].","authors":"B Zhang, G L Zheng, Y Zhang, Y Zhao, H T Zhu, T Zhang, Y Liu, Z C Zheng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of (micro)metastasis in No.12b lymph node in patients with gastric antrum cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 242 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis, complete follow-up data, and no preoperative anti-tumor therapy or history of other malignancies. All study patients had undergone radical gastrectomy (at least D2 radical range) + No.12b lymph node dissection in the Department of Gastric Surgery of Liaoning Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2012. Immunohistochemical staining with antibody CK8/18 was used to detect micrometastasis to lymph nodes. Patients with positive findings on hematoxylin and eosin stained specimens and/or CK8/18 positivity in No.12b lymph node were diagnosed as having No.12b (micro)metastasis and included in the No.12b positive group. All other patients were classified as 12b negative. We investigated the impact of No.12b (micro)metastasis by comparing the clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence free survival (RFS) of these two groups of patients and subjecting possible risk factors to statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Traditional hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that 15/242 patients were positive for No.12b lymph nodes and 227 were negative. A total of 241 negative No. 12b lymph nodes were detected. Immunohistochemical testing revealed that seven of these 241 No.12b lymph nodes (2.9%) were positive for micrometastasis. A further seven positive nodes were identified among the 227 nodes (3.1%) that had been evaluated as negative on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Thus, 22 /242 patients' (9.1%) No.12b nodes were positive for micrometastases, the remaining 220 (90.9%) being negative. Factor analysis showed that No.12b lymph node (micro) metastasis is associated with more severe invasion of the gastric serosa (HR=3.873, 95%CI: 1.676-21.643, <i>P</i>=0.006), T3 stage (HR=1.615, 95%CI: 1.113-1.867, <i>P</i>=0.045), higher N stage (HR=1.768, 95%CI: 1.187-5.654, <i>P</i>=0.019), phase III of TNM stage (HR=2.129, 95%CI: 1.102-3.475, <i>P</i>=0.046), and lymph node metastasis in the No.1/No.8a/No.12a groups (HR=0.451, 95%CI: 0.121-0.552, <i>P</i>=0.035; HR=0.645, 95%CI:0.071-0.886, <i>P</i>=0.032; HR=1.512, 95%CI: 1.381-2.100, <i>P</i>=0.029, respectively). Survival analysis showed that the 5-year RFS of patients in the No.12b positive group was worse than that of those in the No.12b negative group (18.2% vs. 34.5%, <i>P</i><0.001). Independent predictors of RFS were poorer differentiation of the primary tumor (HR=0.528, 95%CI:0.288-0.969, <i>P</i>=0.039), more severe serous invasion (HR=1.262, 95%CI:1.039-1.534, <i>P</i>=0.019), higher T/N/TNM stage (HR=4.880, 95%CI: 1.909-12.476, <i>P</i><0.001; HR=2.332, 95%CI: 1.640-3.317, <i>P</i><0.001; HR=0.139, 95%CI: 0.027-0.713, <i>P</i>=0.018, respectively), and lymph node metastasis in the No.12a/No.1","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"167-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093
J Zhou, X F Chen, Y H Gao, F Yan, H Q Xi
Objective: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in patients following radical gastrectomy with the aim of guiding clinical decisions. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of data of patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy between June 2021 and June 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Participants were reviewed 9-12 months after surgery. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) radical gastrectomy with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of primary gastric cancer; (2) no invasion of neighboring organs, peritoneal dissemination, or distant metastasis confirmed intra- or postoperatively; (3) availability of complete clinical data, including abdominal enhanced computed tomography and pertinent blood laboratory tests 9-12 after surgery. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years; (2) presence of gastric stump cancer or previous gastrectomy; (3) history of or current other primary tumors within the past 5 years; (4) preoperative diagnosis of sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index [SMI) ≤52.4 cm²/m² for men, SMI ≤38.5 cm²/m² for women). The primary focus of the study was to investigate development of postoperative sarcopenia in the study cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with development of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy. Results: The study cohort comprised 373 patients of average age of 57.1±12.3 years, comprising 292 (78.3%) men and 81 (21.7%) women. Postoperative sarcopenia was detected in 81 (21.7%) patients in the entire cohort. The SMI for the entire group was (41.79±7.70) cm2/m2: (46.40±5.03) cm2/m2 for men and (33.52±3.63) cm2/m2 for women. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥60 years (OR=2.170, 95%CI: 1.175-4.007, P=0.013), high literacy (OR=2.512, 95%CI: 1.238-5.093, P=0.011), poor exercise habits (OR=3.263, 95%CI: 1.648-6.458, P=0.001), development of hypoproteinemia (OR=2.312, 95%CI: 1.088-4.913, P=0.029), development of hypertension (OR=2.169, 95%CI: 1.180-3.984, P=0.013), and total gastrectomy (OR=2.444, 95%CI:1.214-4.013,P=0.012) were independent risk factors for postoperative sarcopenia in post-gastrectomy patients who had had gastric cancer (P<0.05). Conclusion: Development of sarcopenia following radical gastrectomy demands attention. Older age, higher education, poor exercise habits, hypoproteinemia, hypertension, and total gastrectomy are risk factors for its development post-radical gastrectomy.
{"title":"[Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].","authors":"J Zhou, X F Chen, Y H Gao, F Yan, H Q Xi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in patients following radical gastrectomy with the aim of guiding clinical decisions. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective observational study of data of patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy between June 2021 and June 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Participants were reviewed 9-12 months after surgery. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) radical gastrectomy with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of primary gastric cancer; (2) no invasion of neighboring organs, peritoneal dissemination, or distant metastasis confirmed intra- or postoperatively; (3) availability of complete clinical data, including abdominal enhanced computed tomography and pertinent blood laboratory tests 9-12 after surgery. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years; (2) presence of gastric stump cancer or previous gastrectomy; (3) history of or current other primary tumors within the past 5 years; (4) preoperative diagnosis of sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index [SMI) ≤52.4 cm²/m² for men, SMI ≤38.5 cm²/m² for women). The primary focus of the study was to investigate development of postoperative sarcopenia in the study cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with development of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 373 patients of average age of 57.1±12.3 years, comprising 292 (78.3%) men and 81 (21.7%) women. Postoperative sarcopenia was detected in 81 (21.7%) patients in the entire cohort. The SMI for the entire group was (41.79±7.70) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>: (46.40±5.03) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> for men and (33.52±3.63) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> for women. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥60 years (OR=2.170, 95%CI: 1.175-4.007, <i>P</i>=0.013), high literacy (OR=2.512, 95%CI: 1.238-5.093, <i>P</i>=0.011), poor exercise habits (OR=3.263, 95%CI: 1.648-6.458, <i>P</i>=0.001), development of hypoproteinemia (OR=2.312, 95%CI: 1.088-4.913, <i>P</i>=0.029), development of hypertension (OR=2.169, 95%CI: 1.180-3.984, <i>P</i>=0.013), and total gastrectomy (OR=2.444, 95%CI:1.214-4.013,<i>P</i>=0.012) were independent risk factors for postoperative sarcopenia in post-gastrectomy patients who had had gastric cancer (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Development of sarcopenia following radical gastrectomy demands attention. Older age, higher education, poor exercise habits, hypoproteinemia, hypertension, and total gastrectomy are risk factors for its development post-radical gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013
L P Li, R H Zhang, L Shang
Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor in China. Most gastric cancer patients are already in the locally advanced stage when they seek medical treatment. Radical surgery is the main treatment for gastric cancer. The quality control of postoperative perioperative management is of great significance in improving the surgical treatment effect and the quality of life of patients. This article systematically summarizes seven aspects, including diet and nutrition management, antimicrobial drug management, pain management, prophylactic anticoagulation management, airway management, postoperative complication management, and discharge and follow-up management, establishes clear quality standards, and achieves the goals of reducing postoperative complications, standardizing perioperative medication use, reducing hospitalization time and costs, thereby reducing patient burden and improving the economic and social benefits of medical institutions.
{"title":"[Quality control of perioperative management after radical surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"L P Li, R H Zhang, L Shang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor in China. Most gastric cancer patients are already in the locally advanced stage when they seek medical treatment. Radical surgery is the main treatment for gastric cancer. The quality control of postoperative perioperative management is of great significance in improving the surgical treatment effect and the quality of life of patients. This article systematically summarizes seven aspects, including diet and nutrition management, antimicrobial drug management, pain management, prophylactic anticoagulation management, airway management, postoperative complication management, and discharge and follow-up management, establishes clear quality standards, and achieves the goals of reducing postoperative complications, standardizing perioperative medication use, reducing hospitalization time and costs, thereby reducing patient burden and improving the economic and social benefits of medical institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029
Z Wang, S L Shao, L Liu, Q Y Lu, L Mu, J C Qin
Objective: This study aims to explore the temporal trend of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and its symptoms after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included primary rectal (adenocarcinoma) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Complete medical records and follow-up data at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were available for all patients. A total of 1454 patients were included, of whom 1094 (75.2%) were aged ≤65 years, and 597 (41.1%) were females. Among them, 1040 cases (71.5%) had an anastomosis-to-anus distance of 0-5cm, and 86 cases (5.9%) received neoadjuvant treatment. All patients completed the Chinese version of the LARS questionnaire and their LARS occurrence and specific symptom information were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Considering past literature and clinical experience, further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential impact factors on severe LARS, including anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma. Results: The occurrence rates of LARS at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were 78.5% (1142/1454), 71.4% (1038/1454), 55.0% (799/1454), 45.7% (664/1454), and 45.7% (664/1454), respectively (χ2=546.180, P<0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 12-month and 18-month time points (P>0.05). When compared with the symptoms at 3 months, the occurrence rates of gas incontinence [1.7% (24/1454) vs. 33.9% (493/1454)], liquid stool incontinence [3.9% (56/1454) vs. 41.9% (609/1454)], increased stool frequency [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 95.9% (1395/1454)], stool clustering [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)], and stool urgency [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)] in the LARS symptom spectrum were significantly alleviated at 12 months (all P<0.05) and remained stable beyond 12 months (all P>0.05). With the extension of postoperative time, the incidence rates of severe LARS exhibited a decreasing trend in different subgroups, of anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma, and reached stability at 12 months postoperatively (all P>0.05). Conclusion: LARS and its specific symptom profile showed a trend of gradual improvement over time up to 1 year postoperatively, and stabilized after more than 1 year. Increased stool frequency and stool clustering are the most common features of abnormal bowel dys function, which improve slowly after surgery.
研究目的本研究旨在探讨直肠癌腹腔镜前切除术后低位前切除综合征(LARS)及其症状的时间趋势。研究方法采用回顾性队列研究设计。研究对象包括2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院接受腹腔镜前切除术的原发性直肠癌(腺癌)患者。所有患者均有完整的病历和术后 3、6、9、12 和 18 个月的随访数据。共纳入 1454 例患者,其中 1094 例(75.2%)年龄小于 65 岁,597 例(41.1%)为女性。其中,1040 例(71.5%)吻合口到肛门的距离为 0-5cm,86 例(5.9%)接受了新辅助治疗。所有患者均填写了中文版 LARS 问卷,并记录了术后 3、6、9、12 和 18 个月的 LARS 发生情况和具体症状信息。考虑到以往的文献和临床经验,研究人员进一步进行了亚组分析,以探讨严重LARS的潜在影响因素,包括吻合口水平、术前新辅助治疗、术后辅助治疗以及是否存在预防性造口。结果术后3、6、9、12和18个月的LARS发生率分别为78.5%(1142/1454)、71.4%(1038/1454)、55.0%(799/1454)、45.7%(664/1454)和45.7%(664/1454)(χ2=546.180,PP>0.05)。在 LARS 症状谱中,大便次数增多 [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 78.7% (1395/1454)]、大便成团 [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)]和便急 [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)]在 12 个月时明显减轻(所有 PP 均大于 0.05)。随着术后时间的延长,在吻合口水平、术前新辅助治疗、术后辅助治疗和是否存在预防性造口等不同亚组中,严重 LARS 的发生率呈下降趋势,并在术后 12 个月时达到稳定(均为 P>0.05)。结论LARS 及其特殊症状在术后 1 年内呈逐渐改善趋势,并在 1 年多后趋于稳定。大便次数增多和大便成团是肠道功能异常最常见的特征,术后改善缓慢。
{"title":"[Analysis of the incidence and symptomatology of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer].","authors":"Z Wang, S L Shao, L Liu, Q Y Lu, L Mu, J C Qin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to explore the temporal trend of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and its symptoms after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included primary rectal (adenocarcinoma) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Complete medical records and follow-up data at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were available for all patients. A total of 1454 patients were included, of whom 1094 (75.2%) were aged ≤65 years, and 597 (41.1%) were females. Among them, 1040 cases (71.5%) had an anastomosis-to-anus distance of 0-5cm, and 86 cases (5.9%) received neoadjuvant treatment. All patients completed the Chinese version of the LARS questionnaire and their LARS occurrence and specific symptom information were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Considering past literature and clinical experience, further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential impact factors on severe LARS, including anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma. <b>Results:</b> The occurrence rates of LARS at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were 78.5% (1142/1454), 71.4% (1038/1454), 55.0% (799/1454), 45.7% (664/1454), and 45.7% (664/1454), respectively (χ<sup>2</sup>=546.180<i>, P</i><0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 12-month and 18-month time points (<i>P</i>>0.05). When compared with the symptoms at 3 months, the occurrence rates of gas incontinence [1.7% (24/1454) vs. 33.9% (493/1454)], liquid stool incontinence [3.9% (56/1454) vs. 41.9% (609/1454)], increased stool frequency [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 95.9% (1395/1454)], stool clustering [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)], and stool urgency [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)] in the LARS symptom spectrum were significantly alleviated at 12 months (all <i>P</i><0.05) and remained stable beyond 12 months (all <i>P</i>>0.05). With the extension of postoperative time, the incidence rates of severe LARS exhibited a decreasing trend in different subgroups, of anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma, and reached stability at 12 months postoperatively (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> LARS and its specific symptom profile showed a trend of gradual improvement over time up to 1 year postoperatively, and stabilized after more than 1 year. Increased stool frequency and stool clustering are the most common features of abnormal bowel dys function, which improve slowly after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-25DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070
H Zhao, Q Sun, X H Jiang, X H Yuan, J S Peng
Gastric cancer is a common tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, and the global trend in morbidity and mortality are not encouraging. Especially in advanced gastric cancer, patient survival outcome is an essential clinical concern and a vital outcome indicator in clinical outcome assessment. This article reviews the definition of clinical outcome assessment and the measurement tools that can be applied in gastric cancer patients, describes the detailed classification of clinical outcome assessment tools, and reviews the current status of the application of clinical outcome assessment in gastric cancer, analyzing the effects and shortcomings of its application, to provide a reference for the clinical staff in choosing the appropriate tools, and assisting in the comprehensive and holistic assessment of clinical outcomes for the promotion of the development of precision medicine.
{"title":"[Application progress of clinical outcome assessment measures in patients with gastric cancer].","authors":"H Zhao, Q Sun, X H Jiang, X H Yuan, J S Peng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a common tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, and the global trend in morbidity and mortality are not encouraging. Especially in advanced gastric cancer, patient survival outcome is an essential clinical concern and a vital outcome indicator in clinical outcome assessment. This article reviews the definition of clinical outcome assessment and the measurement tools that can be applied in gastric cancer patients, describes the detailed classification of clinical outcome assessment tools, and reviews the current status of the application of clinical outcome assessment in gastric cancer, analyzing the effects and shortcomings of its application, to provide a reference for the clinical staff in choosing the appropriate tools, and assisting in the comprehensive and holistic assessment of clinical outcomes for the promotion of the development of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 1","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}