首页 > 最新文献

中华胃肠外科杂志最新文献

英文 中文
[Quality control of lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer]. [局部晚期胃癌淋巴结清扫术的质量控制]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209
B Ke, H Liang

Numerous studies have confirmed that D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Standardized lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in ensuring surgical quality and efficacy. It is recommended to perform D2 lymph node dissection according to the 6th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. For lymph nodes beyond the scope of D2 lymph node dissection, such as No.10, 13, 14v, 16 and mediastinal lymph nodes, selective D2+ lymph node dissection can be performed, which may be advantageous for some patients. Currently, omentectomy is the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical significance of gastrectomy with preservation of the greater omentum requires further validation through large-scale clinical trials. Standardized ex vivo lymph node dissection is important for accurate postoperative staging, and it is recommended to harvest more than 30 lymph nodes to avoid staging deviation.

大量研究证实,D2 淋巴结切除术是治疗局部晚期胃癌的标准手术。标准化的淋巴结清扫在确保手术质量和疗效方面发挥着至关重要的作用。建议根据第六版日本胃癌治疗指南进行 D2 淋巴结清扫。对于超出 D2 淋巴结清扫范围的淋巴结,如 10 号、13 号、14v 号、16 号淋巴结和纵隔淋巴结,可进行选择性 D2+ 淋巴结清扫,这可能对某些患者有利。目前,网膜切除术是治疗局部晚期胃癌的标准手术方法。然而,保留大网膜的胃切除术的临床意义还需要通过大规模临床试验来进一步验证。标准化的体外淋巴结清扫对术后准确分期非常重要,建议采集30个以上的淋巴结以避免分期偏差。
{"title":"[Quality control of lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"B Ke, H Liang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231211-00209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have confirmed that D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Standardized lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in ensuring surgical quality and efficacy. It is recommended to perform D2 lymph node dissection according to the 6th edition of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. For lymph nodes beyond the scope of D2 lymph node dissection, such as No.10, 13, 14v, 16 and mediastinal lymph nodes, selective D2+ lymph node dissection can be performed, which may be advantageous for some patients. Currently, omentectomy is the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical significance of gastrectomy with preservation of the greater omentum requires further validation through large-scale clinical trials. Standardized <i>ex vivo</i> lymph node dissection is important for accurate postoperative staging, and it is recommended to harvest more than 30 lymph nodes to avoid staging deviation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Quality control of gastric resection range in laparoscopic locally advanced gastric cancer]. [腹腔镜局部晚期胃癌胃切除范围的质量控制]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222
H L Zheng, L H Wei, J Lu, C M Huang

After nearly 30 years of exploration and practice, minimally invasive surgical techniques represented by laparoscopic technology have become an important means for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. In China, laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer has been extensively carried out. However, there are still controversies regarding the gastric resection range and methods for advanced gastric cancer. By reviewing relevant domestic and foreign guideline documents and combining team practice experience, this article elaborates on the key points of quality control of laparoscopic gastric resection range for locally advanced gastric cancer from aspects such as tumor localization and gastric resection range for upper, middle and lower gastric tumors. It aims to provide reference for carrying out and promoting laparoscopic radical gastrectomy more safely.

经过近30年的探索和实践,以腹腔镜技术为代表的微创外科技术已成为胃癌外科治疗的重要手段。在我国,腹腔镜根治性切除局部晚期胃癌的手术已广泛开展。然而,对于晚期胃癌的胃切除范围和方法仍存在争议。本文通过查阅国内外相关指南文献,结合团队实践经验,从肿瘤定位、上、中、下胃肿瘤的胃切除范围等方面阐述了局部晚期胃癌腹腔镜胃切除范围的质量控制要点。旨在为更安全地开展和推广腹腔镜胃癌根治术提供参考。
{"title":"[Quality control of gastric resection range in laparoscopic locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"H L Zheng, L H Wei, J Lu, C M Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231216-00222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After nearly 30 years of exploration and practice, minimally invasive surgical techniques represented by laparoscopic technology have become an important means for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. In China, laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer has been extensively carried out. However, there are still controversies regarding the gastric resection range and methods for advanced gastric cancer. By reviewing relevant domestic and foreign guideline documents and combining team practice experience, this article elaborates on the key points of quality control of laparoscopic gastric resection range for locally advanced gastric cancer from aspects such as tumor localization and gastric resection range for upper, middle and lower gastric tumors. It aims to provide reference for carrying out and promoting laparoscopic radical gastrectomy more safely.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"143-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition)]. [食管胃交界处腺癌外科治疗中国专家共识(2024 年版)解读]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214
K Liu, Y F Zhu, Y S Yang, L Q Chen, J K Hu

Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.

食管胃交界腺癌(AEG)因其解剖位置的特殊性,在定义、分期、治疗策略等方面一直存在争议和分歧。2018年9月,《中国食管胃交界腺癌外科治疗专家共识(2018版)》发布,为统一中国胸外科和普外科医生对AEG的外科治疗策略起到了开创性作用。近五年来,关于AEG的多项临床研究成果不断涌现,为关键手术治疗策略的选择提供了新的临床依据。因此,为了进一步规范中国 AEG 的外科治疗,包括 25 位胃肠外科医生和 24 位胸外科医生在内的中国专家组成员于 2024 年发布了《中国食管胃交界腺癌外科治疗中国专家共识(2024 版)》。该共识以近5年最高水平的临床研究证据为基础,最终就AEG手术治疗的热点和重点提出了29条建议,并总结了5个尚待进一步探讨的问题。本综述将对该共识中提出的建议进行总结和详细解读。
{"title":"[Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(2024 edition)].","authors":"K Liu, Y F Zhu, Y S Yang, L Q Chen, J K Hu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231212-00214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the unique nature of its anatomical location, the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been a subject of controversy and disagreement including its definition, staging, and treatment strategies. Chinse expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2018 Edition) had been released in September 2018 and had played a pioneering role in unifying thoracic and general surgeons in China on surgical treatment strategies for AEG. Over the past five years, the emergence of several clinical research results on AEG has provided new clinical evidence for the selection of key surgical treatment strategies. Therefore, to further standardize the surgical treatment of AEG in China, Chinese Expert Consensus on Surgical Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction in China (2024 Edition) was released in 2024 by Chinese expert panel including 25 gastrointestinal surgeons and 24 thoracic surgeons. Based on the highest-level clinical research evidence in recent 5 years, this consensus ultimately formulates 29 recommendations on hotspots and key points on surgical treatment of AEG and summary 5 issues that are still awaiting further exploration. This review will provide a summary and detailed interpretation of the recommendations outlined in this consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy]. [近端胃切除术后消化道重建的质量控制]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155
Z K Xu, L J Wang, F Y Li, H Ge

With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.

随着食管胃交界癌发病率的增加,近端胃切除术的应用率也逐年上升。近端胃切除术后消化道重建的方法多种多样,其中一些重建方法引入时间较短,临床经验有限,缺乏标准化。这种情况必然导致近端胃切除术后消化道重建的临床效果不一致。为促进近端胃切除术后消化道重建的规范化,提高近端胃切除术的临床疗效,减少术后并发症的发生,本文对其适应症进行了阐述、本文详细阐述了《中国近端胃切除术后消化道重建共识(2020年版)》推荐的双道、侧重叠、双皮瓣和胃管重建等四种近端胃切除术后消化道重建方法的适应症、手术步骤和技术要点,为近端胃切除术后消化道重建的应用提供指导。
{"title":"[Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy].","authors":"Z K Xu, L J Wang, F Y Li, H Ge","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing incidence of esophagogastric junction carcinoma, the application rate of proximal gastrectomy has been rising annually. There is a wide variety of methods for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and some of these reconstruction methods have been introduced relatively recently, with limited clinical experience, which led to a lack of standardization. Such a situation will inevitably result in inconsistent clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with digestive tract reconstruction. To promote the standardization of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, improve the clinical efficacy of proximal gastrectomy, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, this article elaborates on the indications, surgical steps and technical points of the four methods after proximal gastrectomy recommended by the \"Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2020 edition)\", such as double tract, side overlap, double flaps and gastric tube reconstruction, providing guidance for the application of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"153-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Thinking and strategy selection on the quality control of early gastric cancer]. [早期胃癌质量控制的思考与策略选择]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153
Z Z Zhang, C C Zhu, H Cao

With the developing technique of the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer, the quality of early gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment is coming into focus, and is crucial to improve the overall management of gastric cancer. It is necessary to establish a quality control system to ensure the quality of diagnosis and treatment for EGC. Based on the summary of the diagnosis and treatment status and technological progress of early gastric cancer, this paper proposes the quality control strategy, content and plan for the diagnosis and treatment process of EGC from the aspects of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment, clinical diagnosis technology, endoscopic and surgical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up, with a view to expound the rationality, standardization and quality guarantee of the diagnosis and treatment process for early gastric cancer.

随着早期胃癌诊断和治疗技术的发展,早期胃癌诊断和治疗的质量逐渐成为关注的焦点,这对提高胃癌的整体管理水平至关重要。有必要建立质量控制体系,确保早期胃癌的诊断和治疗质量。本文在总结早期胃癌诊治现状和技术进展的基础上,从多学科诊治、临床诊断技术、内镜和手术治疗、病理诊断和随访等方面提出了早期胃癌诊治过程的质量控制策略、内容和方案,以期阐述早期胃癌诊治过程的合理性、规范性和质量保证。
{"title":"[Thinking and strategy selection on the quality control of early gastric cancer].","authors":"Z Z Zhang, C C Zhu, H Cao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231101-00153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the developing technique of the diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer, the quality of early gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment is coming into focus, and is crucial to improve the overall management of gastric cancer. It is necessary to establish a quality control system to ensure the quality of diagnosis and treatment for EGC. Based on the summary of the diagnosis and treatment status and technological progress of early gastric cancer, this paper proposes the quality control strategy, content and plan for the diagnosis and treatment process of EGC from the aspects of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment, clinical diagnosis technology, endoscopic and surgical treatment, pathological diagnosis and follow-up, with a view to expound the rationality, standardization and quality guarantee of the diagnosis and treatment process for early gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of No.12b lymph node metastasis in gastric antrum cancer]. [胃癌 12b 淋巴结转移的临床病理因素及临床意义]
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121
B Zhang, G L Zheng, Y Zhang, Y Zhao, H T Zhu, T Zhang, Y Liu, Z C Zheng

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of (micro)metastasis in No.12b lymph node in patients with gastric antrum cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 242 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis, complete follow-up data, and no preoperative anti-tumor therapy or history of other malignancies. All study patients had undergone radical gastrectomy (at least D2 radical range) + No.12b lymph node dissection in the Department of Gastric Surgery of Liaoning Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2012. Immunohistochemical staining with antibody CK8/18 was used to detect micrometastasis to lymph nodes. Patients with positive findings on hematoxylin and eosin stained specimens and/or CK8/18 positivity in No.12b lymph node were diagnosed as having No.12b (micro)metastasis and included in the No.12b positive group. All other patients were classified as 12b negative. We investigated the impact of No.12b (micro)metastasis by comparing the clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence free survival (RFS) of these two groups of patients and subjecting possible risk factors to statistical analysis. Results: Traditional hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that 15/242 patients were positive for No.12b lymph nodes and 227 were negative. A total of 241 negative No. 12b lymph nodes were detected. Immunohistochemical testing revealed that seven of these 241 No.12b lymph nodes (2.9%) were positive for micrometastasis. A further seven positive nodes were identified among the 227 nodes (3.1%) that had been evaluated as negative on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Thus, 22 /242 patients' (9.1%) No.12b nodes were positive for micrometastases, the remaining 220 (90.9%) being negative. Factor analysis showed that No.12b lymph node (micro) metastasis is associated with more severe invasion of the gastric serosa (HR=3.873, 95%CI: 1.676-21.643, P=0.006), T3 stage (HR=1.615, 95%CI: 1.113-1.867, P=0.045), higher N stage (HR=1.768, 95%CI: 1.187-5.654, P=0.019), phase III of TNM stage (HR=2.129, 95%CI: 1.102-3.475, P=0.046), and lymph node metastasis in the No.1/No.8a/No.12a groups (HR=0.451, 95%CI: 0.121-0.552, P=0.035; HR=0.645, 95%CI:0.071-0.886, P=0.032; HR=1.512, 95%CI: 1.381-2.100, P=0.029, respectively). Survival analysis showed that the 5-year RFS of patients in the No.12b positive group was worse than that of those in the No.12b negative group (18.2% vs. 34.5%, P<0.001). Independent predictors of RFS were poorer differentiation of the primary tumor (HR=0.528, 95%CI:0.288-0.969, P=0.039), more severe serous invasion (HR=1.262, 95%CI:1.039-1.534, P=0.019), higher T/N/TNM stage (HR=4.880, 95%CI: 1.909-12.476, P<0.001; HR=2.332, 95%CI: 1.640-3.317, P<0.001; HR=0.139, 95%CI: 0.027-0.713, P=0.018, respectively), and lymph node metastasis in the No.12a/No.1

目的探讨胃癌患者 12b 淋巴结(微)转移的临床病理因素和临床意义。方法: 这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 242 例无远处转移、随访资料完整、术前未接受抗肿瘤治疗或无其他恶性肿瘤病史的胃腺癌患者。所有患者均于2007年1月至2012年12月在辽宁省肿瘤医院胃外科接受了根治性胃切除术(至少D2根治范围)+12b号淋巴结清扫术。采用 CK8/18 抗体免疫组化染色检测淋巴结微转移。苏木精和伊红染色标本阳性和/或12b号淋巴结CK8/18阳性的患者被诊断为12b号(微)转移,并纳入12b号阳性组。其他患者均被归为 12b 阴性组。我们通过比较两组患者的临床病理特征和无复发生存期(RFS),并对可能的风险因素进行统计分析,研究了12b(微)转移的影响。结果传统的苏木精-伊红染色显示,15/242 例患者的 12b 号淋巴结阳性,227 例阴性。共检测出 241 个阴性 12b 淋巴结。免疫组化检测显示,在这 241 个 12b 号淋巴结中,有 7 个(2.9%)微转移阳性。在苏木精-伊红染色切片上被评估为阴性的 227 个淋巴结(3.1%)中,又发现了 7 个阳性淋巴结。因此,242 名患者中有 22 个(9.1%)No.12b 结节微转移阳性,其余 220 个(90.9%)为阴性。因子分析显示,12b 号b淋巴结(微转移)与胃黏膜受侵袭更严重(HR=3.873,95%CI:1.676-21.643,P=0.006)、T3分期(HR=1.615,95%CI:1.113-1.867,P=0.045)、较高的N期(HR=1.768,95%CI:1.187-5.654,P=0.019)、TNM分期的III期(HR=2.129,95%CI:1.102-3.475,P=0.046)以及淋巴结转移在No.1/No.8a/No.12a组(HR=0.451,95%CI:0.121-0.552,P=0.035;HR=0.645,95%CI:0.071-0.886,P=0.032;HR=1.512,95%CI:1.381-2.100,P=0.029)。生存分析显示,No.12b 阳性组患者的 5 年 RFS 比 No.12b阴性组患者的5年RFS更差(18.2% vs. 34.5%,PP=0.039),浆液性浸润更严重(HR=1.262,95%CI:1.039-1.534,P=0.019),T/N/TNM分期更高(HR=4.880,95%CI:1.909-12.476,PPP=0.018),No.12a/No.12b组(HR=0.698,95%CI:0.518-0.941,P=0.018;HR=0.341,95%CI:0.154-0.758,P=0.008)。结论微转移的检测可提高淋巴结阳性率。在胃窦癌患者中,对于术中有证据表明肿瘤侵犯浆膜、有两个以上淋巴结转移、1/8a/12a 组淋巴结可疑的患者,清扫 12b 组淋巴结可改善其预后。
{"title":"[Clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of No.12b lymph node metastasis in gastric antrum cancer].","authors":"B Zhang, G L Zheng, Y Zhang, Y Zhao, H T Zhu, T Zhang, Y Liu, Z C Zheng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230412-00121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the clinicopathological factors and clinical significance of (micro)metastasis in No.12b lymph node in patients with gastric antrum cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 242 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis, complete follow-up data, and no preoperative anti-tumor therapy or history of other malignancies. All study patients had undergone radical gastrectomy (at least D2 radical range) + No.12b lymph node dissection in the Department of Gastric Surgery of Liaoning Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2012. Immunohistochemical staining with antibody CK8/18 was used to detect micrometastasis to lymph nodes. Patients with positive findings on hematoxylin and eosin stained specimens and/or CK8/18 positivity in No.12b lymph node were diagnosed as having No.12b (micro)metastasis and included in the No.12b positive group. All other patients were classified as 12b negative. We investigated the impact of No.12b (micro)metastasis by comparing the clinicopathological characteristics and recurrence free survival (RFS) of these two groups of patients and subjecting possible risk factors to statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> Traditional hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that 15/242 patients were positive for No.12b lymph nodes and 227 were negative. A total of 241 negative No. 12b lymph nodes were detected. Immunohistochemical testing revealed that seven of these 241 No.12b lymph nodes (2.9%) were positive for micrometastasis. A further seven positive nodes were identified among the 227 nodes (3.1%) that had been evaluated as negative on hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Thus, 22 /242 patients' (9.1%) No.12b nodes were positive for micrometastases, the remaining 220 (90.9%) being negative. Factor analysis showed that No.12b lymph node (micro) metastasis is associated with more severe invasion of the gastric serosa (HR=3.873, 95%CI: 1.676-21.643, <i>P</i>=0.006), T3 stage (HR=1.615, 95%CI: 1.113-1.867, <i>P</i>=0.045), higher N stage (HR=1.768, 95%CI: 1.187-5.654, <i>P</i>=0.019), phase III of TNM stage (HR=2.129, 95%CI: 1.102-3.475, <i>P</i>=0.046), and lymph node metastasis in the No.1/No.8a/No.12a groups (HR=0.451, 95%CI: 0.121-0.552, <i>P</i>=0.035; HR=0.645, 95%CI:0.071-0.886, <i>P</i>=0.032; HR=1.512, 95%CI: 1.381-2.100, <i>P</i>=0.029, respectively). Survival analysis showed that the 5-year RFS of patients in the No.12b positive group was worse than that of those in the No.12b negative group (18.2% vs. 34.5%, <i>P</i><0.001). Independent predictors of RFS were poorer differentiation of the primary tumor (HR=0.528, 95%CI:0.288-0.969, <i>P</i>=0.039), more severe serous invasion (HR=1.262, 95%CI:1.039-1.534, <i>P</i>=0.019), higher T/N/TNM stage (HR=4.880, 95%CI: 1.909-12.476, <i>P</i><0.001; HR=2.332, 95%CI: 1.640-3.317, <i>P</i><0.001; HR=0.139, 95%CI: 0.027-0.713, <i>P</i>=0.018, respectively), and lymph node metastasis in the No.12a/No.1","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"167-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. [胃癌根治术后肌肉疏松症的发病率和风险因素]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093
J Zhou, X F Chen, Y H Gao, F Yan, H Q Xi

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in patients following radical gastrectomy with the aim of guiding clinical decisions. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of data of patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy between June 2021 and June 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Participants were reviewed 9-12 months after surgery. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) radical gastrectomy with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of primary gastric cancer; (2) no invasion of neighboring organs, peritoneal dissemination, or distant metastasis confirmed intra- or postoperatively; (3) availability of complete clinical data, including abdominal enhanced computed tomography and pertinent blood laboratory tests 9-12 after surgery. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years; (2) presence of gastric stump cancer or previous gastrectomy; (3) history of or current other primary tumors within the past 5 years; (4) preoperative diagnosis of sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index [SMI) ≤52.4 cm²/m² for men, SMI ≤38.5 cm²/m² for women). The primary focus of the study was to investigate development of postoperative sarcopenia in the study cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with development of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy. Results: The study cohort comprised 373 patients of average age of 57.1±12.3 years, comprising 292 (78.3%) men and 81 (21.7%) women. Postoperative sarcopenia was detected in 81 (21.7%) patients in the entire cohort. The SMI for the entire group was (41.79±7.70) cm2/m2: (46.40±5.03) cm2/m2 for men and (33.52±3.63) cm2/m2 for women. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥60 years (OR=2.170, 95%CI: 1.175-4.007, P=0.013), high literacy (OR=2.512, 95%CI: 1.238-5.093, P=0.011), poor exercise habits (OR=3.263, 95%CI: 1.648-6.458, P=0.001), development of hypoproteinemia (OR=2.312, 95%CI: 1.088-4.913, P=0.029), development of hypertension (OR=2.169, 95%CI: 1.180-3.984, P=0.013), and total gastrectomy (OR=2.444, 95%CI:1.214-4.013,P=0.012) were independent risk factors for postoperative sarcopenia in post-gastrectomy patients who had had gastric cancer (P<0.05). Conclusion: Development of sarcopenia following radical gastrectomy demands attention. Older age, higher education, poor exercise habits, hypoproteinemia, hypertension, and total gastrectomy are risk factors for its development post-radical gastrectomy.

目的调查根治性胃切除术后患者肌少症的发病率和风险因素,以指导临床决策。方法: 这是一项回顾性观察研究:这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象为2021年6月至2022年6月期间在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心普外科接受根治性胃切除术的患者。参与者在术后 9-12 个月接受复查。纳入标准如下(1)根治性胃切除术,术后病理诊断为原发性胃癌;(2)术中或术后未证实邻近器官受侵、腹膜播散或远处转移;(3)术后 9-12 个月有完整的临床资料,包括腹部增强计算机断层扫描和相关血液实验室检查。排除标准如下(1) 年龄 结果:研究组共有 373 名患者,平均年龄(57.1±12.3)岁,其中男性 292 人(78.3%),女性 81 人(21.7%)。整个组群中有 81 名(21.7%)患者在术后出现了肌少症。全组的 SMI 为 (41.79±7.70) cm2/m2:男性为 (46.40±5.03) cm2/m2,女性为 (33.52±3.63) cm2/m2。根据多变量逻辑回归分析,年龄≥60 岁(OR=2.170,95%CI:1.175-4.007,P=0.013)、文化程度高(OR=2.512,95%CI:1.238-5.093,P=0.011)、运动习惯差(OR=3.263,95%CI:1.648-6.458,P=0.001)、出现低蛋白血症(OR=2.312,95%CI:1.088-4.913,P=0.029)、出现高血压(OR=2.169,95%CI:1.180-3.984,P=0.013)和全胃切除术(OR=2.444,95%CI:1.214-4.013,P=0.012)是胃癌根治术后患者术后肌少症的独立危险因素(PConclusion:根治性胃切除术后出现肌肉疏松症需要引起重视。高龄、高学历、不良运动习惯、低蛋白血症、高血压和全胃切除术是根治性胃切除术后出现肌少症的危险因素。
{"title":"[Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].","authors":"J Zhou, X F Chen, Y H Gao, F Yan, H Q Xi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230324-00093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in patients following radical gastrectomy with the aim of guiding clinical decisions. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective observational study of data of patients who had undergone radical gastrectomy between June 2021 and June 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. Participants were reviewed 9-12 months after surgery. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) radical gastrectomy with a postoperative pathological diagnosis of primary gastric cancer; (2) no invasion of neighboring organs, peritoneal dissemination, or distant metastasis confirmed intra- or postoperatively; (3) availability of complete clinical data, including abdominal enhanced computed tomography and pertinent blood laboratory tests 9-12 after surgery. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age <18 years; (2) presence of gastric stump cancer or previous gastrectomy; (3) history of or current other primary tumors within the past 5 years; (4) preoperative diagnosis of sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index [SMI) ≤52.4 cm²/m² for men, SMI ≤38.5 cm²/m² for women). The primary focus of the study was to investigate development of postoperative sarcopenia in the study cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with development of sarcopenia after radical gastrectomy. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 373 patients of average age of 57.1±12.3 years, comprising 292 (78.3%) men and 81 (21.7%) women. Postoperative sarcopenia was detected in 81 (21.7%) patients in the entire cohort. The SMI for the entire group was (41.79±7.70) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>: (46.40±5.03) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> for men and (33.52±3.63) cm<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup> for women. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥60 years (OR=2.170, 95%CI: 1.175-4.007, <i>P</i>=0.013), high literacy (OR=2.512, 95%CI: 1.238-5.093, <i>P</i>=0.011), poor exercise habits (OR=3.263, 95%CI: 1.648-6.458, <i>P</i>=0.001), development of hypoproteinemia (OR=2.312, 95%CI: 1.088-4.913, <i>P</i>=0.029), development of hypertension (OR=2.169, 95%CI: 1.180-3.984, <i>P</i>=0.013), and total gastrectomy (OR=2.444, 95%CI:1.214-4.013,<i>P</i>=0.012) were independent risk factors for postoperative sarcopenia in post-gastrectomy patients who had had gastric cancer (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Development of sarcopenia following radical gastrectomy demands attention. Older age, higher education, poor exercise habits, hypoproteinemia, hypertension, and total gastrectomy are risk factors for its development post-radical gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Quality control of perioperative management after radical surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer]. [局部晚期胃癌根治术后围手术期管理的质量控制]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013
L P Li, R H Zhang, L Shang

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor in China. Most gastric cancer patients are already in the locally advanced stage when they seek medical treatment. Radical surgery is the main treatment for gastric cancer. The quality control of postoperative perioperative management is of great significance in improving the surgical treatment effect and the quality of life of patients. This article systematically summarizes seven aspects, including diet and nutrition management, antimicrobial drug management, pain management, prophylactic anticoagulation management, airway management, postoperative complication management, and discharge and follow-up management, establishes clear quality standards, and achieves the goals of reducing postoperative complications, standardizing perioperative medication use, reducing hospitalization time and costs, thereby reducing patient burden and improving the economic and social benefits of medical institutions.

胃癌是我国常见的恶性肿瘤。大多数胃癌患者就医时已是局部晚期。根治性手术是胃癌的主要治疗手段。术后围手术期管理的质量控制对提高手术治疗效果和患者生活质量具有重要意义。本文从饮食营养管理、抗菌药物管理、疼痛管理、预防性抗凝管理、气道管理、术后并发症管理、出院及随访管理等七个方面进行系统总结,建立明确的质量标准,达到减少术后并发症、规范围手术期用药、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用的目的,从而减轻患者负担,提高医疗机构的经济效益和社会效益。
{"title":"[Quality control of perioperative management after radical surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer].","authors":"L P Li, R H Zhang, L Shang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240109-00013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor in China. Most gastric cancer patients are already in the locally advanced stage when they seek medical treatment. Radical surgery is the main treatment for gastric cancer. The quality control of postoperative perioperative management is of great significance in improving the surgical treatment effect and the quality of life of patients. This article systematically summarizes seven aspects, including diet and nutrition management, antimicrobial drug management, pain management, prophylactic anticoagulation management, airway management, postoperative complication management, and discharge and follow-up management, establishes clear quality standards, and achieves the goals of reducing postoperative complications, standardizing perioperative medication use, reducing hospitalization time and costs, thereby reducing patient burden and improving the economic and social benefits of medical institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 2","pages":"158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Analysis of the incidence and symptomatology of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer]. [腹腔镜直肠癌前路切除术后低位前路切除综合征的发病率和症状分析]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029
Z Wang, S L Shao, L Liu, Q Y Lu, L Mu, J C Qin

Objective: This study aims to explore the temporal trend of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and its symptoms after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included primary rectal (adenocarcinoma) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Complete medical records and follow-up data at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were available for all patients. A total of 1454 patients were included, of whom 1094 (75.2%) were aged ≤65 years, and 597 (41.1%) were females. Among them, 1040 cases (71.5%) had an anastomosis-to-anus distance of 0-5cm, and 86 cases (5.9%) received neoadjuvant treatment. All patients completed the Chinese version of the LARS questionnaire and their LARS occurrence and specific symptom information were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Considering past literature and clinical experience, further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential impact factors on severe LARS, including anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma. Results: The occurrence rates of LARS at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were 78.5% (1142/1454), 71.4% (1038/1454), 55.0% (799/1454), 45.7% (664/1454), and 45.7% (664/1454), respectively (χ2=546.180, P<0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 12-month and 18-month time points (P>0.05). When compared with the symptoms at 3 months, the occurrence rates of gas incontinence [1.7% (24/1454) vs. 33.9% (493/1454)], liquid stool incontinence [3.9% (56/1454) vs. 41.9% (609/1454)], increased stool frequency [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 95.9% (1395/1454)], stool clustering [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)], and stool urgency [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)] in the LARS symptom spectrum were significantly alleviated at 12 months (all P<0.05) and remained stable beyond 12 months (all P>0.05). With the extension of postoperative time, the incidence rates of severe LARS exhibited a decreasing trend in different subgroups, of anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma, and reached stability at 12 months postoperatively (all P>0.05). Conclusion: LARS and its specific symptom profile showed a trend of gradual improvement over time up to 1 year postoperatively, and stabilized after more than 1 year. Increased stool frequency and stool clustering are the most common features of abnormal bowel dys function, which improve slowly after surgery.

研究目的本研究旨在探讨直肠癌腹腔镜前切除术后低位前切除综合征(LARS)及其症状的时间趋势。研究方法采用回顾性队列研究设计。研究对象包括2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院接受腹腔镜前切除术的原发性直肠癌(腺癌)患者。所有患者均有完整的病历和术后 3、6、9、12 和 18 个月的随访数据。共纳入 1454 例患者,其中 1094 例(75.2%)年龄小于 65 岁,597 例(41.1%)为女性。其中,1040 例(71.5%)吻合口到肛门的距离为 0-5cm,86 例(5.9%)接受了新辅助治疗。所有患者均填写了中文版 LARS 问卷,并记录了术后 3、6、9、12 和 18 个月的 LARS 发生情况和具体症状信息。考虑到以往的文献和临床经验,研究人员进一步进行了亚组分析,以探讨严重LARS的潜在影响因素,包括吻合口水平、术前新辅助治疗、术后辅助治疗以及是否存在预防性造口。结果术后3、6、9、12和18个月的LARS发生率分别为78.5%(1142/1454)、71.4%(1038/1454)、55.0%(799/1454)、45.7%(664/1454)和45.7%(664/1454)(χ2=546.180,PP>0.05)。在 LARS 症状谱中,大便次数增多 [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 78.7% (1395/1454)]、大便成团 [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)]和便急 [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)]在 12 个月时明显减轻(所有 PP 均大于 0.05)。随着术后时间的延长,在吻合口水平、术前新辅助治疗、术后辅助治疗和是否存在预防性造口等不同亚组中,严重 LARS 的发生率呈下降趋势,并在术后 12 个月时达到稳定(均为 P>0.05)。结论LARS 及其特殊症状在术后 1 年内呈逐渐改善趋势,并在 1 年多后趋于稳定。大便次数增多和大便成团是肠道功能异常最常见的特征,术后改善缓慢。
{"title":"[Analysis of the incidence and symptomatology of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer].","authors":"Z Wang, S L Shao, L Liu, Q Y Lu, L Mu, J C Qin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230206-00029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to explore the temporal trend of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and its symptoms after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included primary rectal (adenocarcinoma) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Complete medical records and follow-up data at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were available for all patients. A total of 1454 patients were included, of whom 1094 (75.2%) were aged ≤65 years, and 597 (41.1%) were females. Among them, 1040 cases (71.5%) had an anastomosis-to-anus distance of 0-5cm, and 86 cases (5.9%) received neoadjuvant treatment. All patients completed the Chinese version of the LARS questionnaire and their LARS occurrence and specific symptom information were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Considering past literature and clinical experience, further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential impact factors on severe LARS, including anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma. <b>Results:</b> The occurrence rates of LARS at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were 78.5% (1142/1454), 71.4% (1038/1454), 55.0% (799/1454), 45.7% (664/1454), and 45.7% (664/1454), respectively (χ<sup>2</sup>=546.180<i>, P</i><0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 12-month and 18-month time points (<i>P</i>>0.05). When compared with the symptoms at 3 months, the occurrence rates of gas incontinence [1.7% (24/1454) vs. 33.9% (493/1454)], liquid stool incontinence [3.9% (56/1454) vs. 41.9% (609/1454)], increased stool frequency [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 95.9% (1395/1454)], stool clustering [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)], and stool urgency [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)] in the LARS symptom spectrum were significantly alleviated at 12 months (all <i>P</i><0.05) and remained stable beyond 12 months (all <i>P</i>>0.05). With the extension of postoperative time, the incidence rates of severe LARS exhibited a decreasing trend in different subgroups, of anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma, and reached stability at 12 months postoperatively (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> LARS and its specific symptom profile showed a trend of gradual improvement over time up to 1 year postoperatively, and stabilized after more than 1 year. Increased stool frequency and stool clustering are the most common features of abnormal bowel dys function, which improve slowly after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Application progress of clinical outcome assessment measures in patients with gastric cancer]. [胃癌患者临床疗效评估指标的应用进展]。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070
H Zhao, Q Sun, X H Jiang, X H Yuan, J S Peng

Gastric cancer is a common tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, and the global trend in morbidity and mortality are not encouraging. Especially in advanced gastric cancer, patient survival outcome is an essential clinical concern and a vital outcome indicator in clinical outcome assessment. This article reviews the definition of clinical outcome assessment and the measurement tools that can be applied in gastric cancer patients, describes the detailed classification of clinical outcome assessment tools, and reviews the current status of the application of clinical outcome assessment in gastric cancer, analyzing the effects and shortcomings of its application, to provide a reference for the clinical staff in choosing the appropriate tools, and assisting in the comprehensive and holistic assessment of clinical outcomes for the promotion of the development of precision medicine.

胃癌是一种常见的消化道肿瘤,其发病率和死亡率的全球趋势不容乐观。尤其是晚期胃癌,患者的生存期是临床上必须关注的问题,也是临床疗效评估的重要结果指标。本文综述了临床结局评估的定义及可应用于胃癌患者的测量工具,阐述了临床结局评估工具的详细分类,并回顾了临床结局评估在胃癌中的应用现状,分析了其应用的效果和不足,为临床医务人员选择合适的工具提供参考,辅助临床结局的全面整体评估,促进精准医学的发展。
{"title":"[Application progress of clinical outcome assessment measures in patients with gastric cancer].","authors":"H Zhao, Q Sun, X H Jiang, X H Yuan, J S Peng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070","DOIUrl":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230308-00070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a common tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, and the global trend in morbidity and mortality are not encouraging. Especially in advanced gastric cancer, patient survival outcome is an essential clinical concern and a vital outcome indicator in clinical outcome assessment. This article reviews the definition of clinical outcome assessment and the measurement tools that can be applied in gastric cancer patients, describes the detailed classification of clinical outcome assessment tools, and reviews the current status of the application of clinical outcome assessment in gastric cancer, analyzing the effects and shortcomings of its application, to provide a reference for the clinical staff in choosing the appropriate tools, and assisting in the comprehensive and holistic assessment of clinical outcomes for the promotion of the development of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 1","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139543161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1