In his last monograph Das Recht der Freiheit Axel Honneth establishes the method of normative reconstruction as a basis for immanent critique. With this method he tries to encounter the tendency of existing theories of justice to abandon societal reality. The article demonstrates that this attempt is based on a theoretical framework which construes a normativistically biased picture of society. In the end the mode of critique Honneth presents also abandons reality, just in another way.
{"title":"Normative Rekonstruktion und Kritik","authors":"R. Mohan","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0003","url":null,"abstract":"In his last monograph Das Recht der Freiheit Axel Honneth establishes the method of normative reconstruction as a basis for immanent critique. With this method he tries to encounter the tendency of existing theories of justice to abandon societal reality. The article demonstrates that this attempt is based on a theoretical framework which construes a normativistically biased picture of society. In the end the mode of critique Honneth presents also abandons reality, just in another way.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122363998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In paragraphs 1 to 17 of the Rechtslehre (1797) Kant wants to proof that private property can be justified reasonably. He wants to demonstrate that each thing may be and may become private property, i. e. that it is allowed to exclude all others of their use – and the criterion for this being the moral respectively legal law. A detailed analysis of Kant’s “deduction” will show that it fails: The possession or appropriation of each object of the free will as private property is (according to Kantian terms) unreasonable and unlawful, because it contradicts the categorical imperative respectively the rational law. The Kantian right of ownership is not the expression of reasonable social relations, but justifies classstructures. Consequently, there is no duty (in Kant’s sense) to respect civil societies based on private ownership.
{"title":"Kants Begründung des Privateigentums und das Scheitern der Deduktion","authors":"S. Klar","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0010","url":null,"abstract":"In paragraphs 1 to 17 of the Rechtslehre (1797) Kant wants to proof that private property can be justified reasonably. He wants to demonstrate that each thing may be and may become private property, i. e. that it is allowed to exclude all others of their use – and the criterion for this being the moral respectively legal law. A detailed analysis of Kant’s “deduction” will show that it fails: The possession or appropriation of each object of the free will as private property is (according to Kantian terms) unreasonable and unlawful, because it contradicts the categorical imperative respectively the rational law. The Kantian right of ownership is not the expression of reasonable social relations, but justifies classstructures. Consequently, there is no duty (in Kant’s sense) to respect civil societies based on private ownership.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116814057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The first part of the article deals with Daniel Loick’s critique of sovereignty. Loick claims to abolish the remainder of this principle (i.e. Habermas, Kelsen) and tries to positively adopt the Kantian objection to anarchy as “law and freedom without power”: beyond state authority, law without pressure would fulfil itself as an agreement, serving to align collective actions and social cooperation. Loick takes law for ‘morality’, originating not from the individual but the collective. He thereby refers to intellectual traditions of Judaism (Cohen, Rosenzweig), but remains wholly oblivious to the anti-Semitism of the society in which Jews live. This abstraction takes its toll when he attempts to universalize the question of law in Judaism – and thus offers a complementary image to the theory of sovereignty conceptualized by Chantal Mouffe. In her uncritical adaptation of Carl Schmitt and Martin Heidegger Mouffe pursues an ontologization of the political. Her new manifesto for left-wing theory seeks to refute the cosmopolitan illusions of modern Western politics. Mouffe, too, glorifies “collective identities”, but she extends the “friend/enemy” or the “we/they” distinction to a crucial point. Adopting the geopolitical consequences of Schmitt’s “Großraumtheorie” from the early 1940s, her ontologization leads to a critique of liberalism altogether, particularly of the hegemony of the United States. Neither Mouffe nor Loick are interested in a critical concept of law (Eugen Paschukanis, Franz Neumann). Although both Mouffe and Loick refer to Marx, they fail to understand that law does not only express a particular class interest but a false universality, according to Marx’s concept of the value-form.
{"title":"Kelsen für Anarchisten, Schmitt für Sozialdemokraten","authors":"G. Scheit","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0006","url":null,"abstract":"The first part of the article deals with Daniel Loick’s critique of sovereignty. Loick claims to abolish the remainder of this principle (i.e. Habermas, Kelsen) and tries to positively adopt the Kantian objection to anarchy as “law and freedom without power”: beyond state authority, law without pressure would fulfil itself as an agreement, serving to align collective actions and social cooperation. Loick takes law for ‘morality’, originating not from the individual but the collective. He thereby refers to intellectual traditions of Judaism (Cohen, Rosenzweig), but remains wholly oblivious to the anti-Semitism of the society in which Jews live. This abstraction takes its toll when he attempts to universalize the question of law in Judaism – and thus offers a complementary image to the theory of sovereignty conceptualized by Chantal Mouffe. In her uncritical adaptation of Carl Schmitt and Martin Heidegger Mouffe pursues an ontologization of the political. Her new manifesto for left-wing theory seeks to refute the cosmopolitan illusions of modern Western politics. Mouffe, too, glorifies “collective identities”, but she extends the “friend/enemy” or the “we/they” distinction to a crucial point. Adopting the geopolitical consequences of Schmitt’s “Großraumtheorie” from the early 1940s, her ontologization leads to a critique of liberalism altogether, particularly of the hegemony of the United States. Neither Mouffe nor Loick are interested in a critical concept of law (Eugen Paschukanis, Franz Neumann). Although both Mouffe and Loick refer to Marx, they fail to understand that law does not only express a particular class interest but a false universality, according to Marx’s concept of the value-form.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121823309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
For critical theory of society its own normative basis is a problem. In this article I argue as follows. First, I shall outline this problem by comparing the categorical imperative of Kant with the so-called categorical imperatives given by Marx and Adorno. Then I shall argue that the orthodox Marx-Interpretation of the Frank Kuhne:Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Leibniz Universität Hannover, Schwerpunkt Praktische Philosophie, E ˗ Mail: kuhne@philosem.uni-hannover.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2015; 2(1): 139–170
对于社会批判理论而言，其自身的规范基础是个问题。在这篇文章中，我的论点如下。首先，我将通过比较康德的绝对命令与马克思和阿多诺给出的所谓绝对命令来概述这个问题。那么，我将论证正统的马克思主义对《弗兰克·库恩》的阐释:莱布尼茨哲学研究所》(Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter) Universität汉诺威，Schwerpunkt Praktische Philosophie, E - Mail: kuhne@philosem.uni-hannover.de Zeitschrift fr kritische Sozialtheorie und philosophy 2015;2 (1): 139 - 170
{"title":"Transformation der praktischen Philosophie in kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft?","authors":"F. Kuhne","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0007","url":null,"abstract":"For critical theory of society its own normative basis is a problem. In this article I argue as follows. First, I shall outline this problem by comparing the categorical imperative of Kant with the so-called categorical imperatives given by Marx and Adorno. Then I shall argue that the orthodox Marx-Interpretation of the Frank Kuhne:Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Philosophie der Leibniz Universität Hannover, Schwerpunkt Praktische Philosophie, E ˗ Mail: kuhne@philosem.uni-hannover.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2015; 2(1): 139–170","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134249793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Der Artikel entwickelt eine kritisch-realistische Darstellung zweier Aspekte, die in der Untersuchung von Macht haufig implizit bleiben: der vorausgesetzten Kausalitatstheorie und der Umgangsweise mit den normativen Konnotationen von Macht. Diskutiert werden diese Fragen teilweise unter Bezug auf Foucaults Sichtweisen von Macht, insbesondere wie sie in Der Wille zum Wissen dargelegt sind. Hinsichtlich Foucaults ubiquitarer Machtkonzeption lautet die These, dass diese kompatibel ist mit Begriffen von Verursachung oder Macht, die auf Fahigkeiten von Objekten referieren, denn verstreute Macht setzt Kausali- tat und causal powers voraus. Im zweiten Teil des Artikels wird die Auffassung vertreten, dass den normativen Implikationen von Macht nicht aus dem Weg gegangen werden sollte und dass Bewertungen von Macht in Hinblick auf menschliches Wohlergehen und Leid zu den Adaquatheitsbedingungen sozial- wissenschaftlicher Beschreibungen und Erklarungen gehoren. Angesichts der Unhaltbarkeit der Fakten/Werte- und Sein/Sollens-Unterscheidungen sowie der Unerlasslichkeit dichter ethischer Begriffe in den Sozialwissenschaften werden positivistische und foucaultianische Zuruckweisungen von Normativitat einer Kritik unterzogen.
{"title":"Macht, Kausalität und Normativität","authors":"Andrew Sayer","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Der Artikel entwickelt eine kritisch-realistische Darstellung zweier Aspekte, die in der Untersuchung von Macht haufig implizit bleiben: der vorausgesetzten Kausalitatstheorie und der Umgangsweise mit den normativen Konnotationen von Macht. Diskutiert werden diese Fragen teilweise unter Bezug auf Foucaults Sichtweisen von Macht, insbesondere wie sie in Der Wille zum Wissen dargelegt sind. Hinsichtlich Foucaults ubiquitarer Machtkonzeption lautet die These, dass diese kompatibel ist mit Begriffen von Verursachung oder Macht, die auf Fahigkeiten von Objekten referieren, denn verstreute Macht setzt Kausali- tat und causal powers voraus. Im zweiten Teil des Artikels wird die Auffassung vertreten, dass den normativen Implikationen von Macht nicht aus dem Weg gegangen werden sollte und dass Bewertungen von Macht in Hinblick auf menschliches Wohlergehen und Leid zu den Adaquatheitsbedingungen sozial- wissenschaftlicher Beschreibungen und Erklarungen gehoren. Angesichts der Unhaltbarkeit der Fakten/Werte- und Sein/Sollens-Unterscheidungen sowie der Unerlasslichkeit dichter ethischer Begriffe in den Sozialwissenschaften werden positivistische und foucaultianische Zuruckweisungen von Normativitat einer Kritik unterzogen.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117350201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article gives an overview of critical realism’s most important debates and perspectives. In four steps, critical realism’s principles in philosophy of science, its emergent powers materialism and critical naturalism, its central interventions in the field of social ontology, and its ethical project of explanatory critique are pondered. Subsequently, the relationship of critical realism to a contemporary critical social theory is considered by offering suggestions on the institution, minimal criteria and main subject matters of the latter. It is argued that critical realism is an extremely productive philosophical framework for critical social theory and that it may, via a systems theoretical elaboration, pro1 Für Anmerkungen und Hinweise zu diesem Text danke ich Ingo Elbe, Dimitiri Mader, Johanna Müller und Hartwig Schuck. Des Weiteren gilt mein Dank dem DFG-Kolleg ‚Postwachstum‘ für ein Fellowship, in dessen Rahmen ich diesen Artikel schreiben konnte, wie auch für die unzähligen sozialtheoretischen Anregungen, die ich in Diskussionen in Jena bekommen habe. Urs Lindner:wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter amMax-Weber-Kolleg, Universität Erfurt, E ˗ Mail: urs.lindner@uni-erfurt.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2014; 1(2): 198–275
本文概述了批判现实主义最重要的争论和观点。本文分四个步骤对批判实在论在科学哲学中的原则、它的新兴力量唯物主义和批判自然主义、它在社会本体论领域的核心干预以及它的解释性批判的伦理工程进行了思考。随后，通过对后者的制度、最低标准和主要主题提出建议，来考虑批判现实主义与当代批判社会理论的关系。作者认为，批判现实主义是批判社会理论的一个极具生产力的哲学框架，它可以通过系统的理论阐述，支持哲学理论与社会理论的结合，如易北、迪米特里·马德尔、约翰娜·梅勒和哈特维格·舒克。deweiteren gilt mein Dank dem DFG-Kolleg, Postwachstum ' r ein Fellowship, in dessen Rahmen ich diesen Artikel schreiben konnte, wie auch f r die unzähligen socizialtheortischen Anregungen, die ich in Diskussionen in Jena bekommen habe。《科学与社会理论与哲学》，2014;1 (2): 198 - 275
{"title":"Soziale Strukturen, generative Mechanismen und das gute Leben","authors":"Urs Lindner","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0009","url":null,"abstract":"This article gives an overview of critical realism’s most important debates and perspectives. In four steps, critical realism’s principles in philosophy of science, its emergent powers materialism and critical naturalism, its central interventions in the field of social ontology, and its ethical project of explanatory critique are pondered. Subsequently, the relationship of critical realism to a contemporary critical social theory is considered by offering suggestions on the institution, minimal criteria and main subject matters of the latter. It is argued that critical realism is an extremely productive philosophical framework for critical social theory and that it may, via a systems theoretical elaboration, pro1 Für Anmerkungen und Hinweise zu diesem Text danke ich Ingo Elbe, Dimitiri Mader, Johanna Müller und Hartwig Schuck. Des Weiteren gilt mein Dank dem DFG-Kolleg ‚Postwachstum‘ für ein Fellowship, in dessen Rahmen ich diesen Artikel schreiben konnte, wie auch für die unzähligen sozialtheoretischen Anregungen, die ich in Diskussionen in Jena bekommen habe. Urs Lindner:wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter amMax-Weber-Kolleg, Universität Erfurt, E ˗ Mail: urs.lindner@uni-erfurt.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2014; 1(2): 198–275","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128271312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rettende Kritik der Geschichtsphilosophie","authors":"J. Rohbeck","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"5 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130607721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The concept of interests is almost ubiquitous in critical social science. Highly controversial, however, is the notion of ‚objective‘ interests, which is often criticized as being determinist and reductionist. The flip-side tendency of developing a purely subjectivist account of interests turns out to be no less problematic. This article reconstructs objective and subjective facets of ‚interest‘ and develops a multi-dimensional, critical realist conception of ‚manifest‘, ‚ethical‘ and ‚positional‘ interests which is intended to capture these facets. Such a multi-dimensio1 Fürwertvolle Anregungen, Kritik undDiskussionen danke ich der anonymenGutachterin sowie Andreas Grünewald, Urs Lindner, Ingo Elbe, Tine Sonnenburg, Martin Fries, Nadine Telljohann, Dimitri Mader, Michael Schuck und Frieder OttoWolf. Aus Gründen der besseren Lesbarkeit wird hier und im Folgenden auf die gleichzeitige Verwendung männlicher und weiblicher Sprachformen verzichtet. Gleichwohl gelten sämtliche Personenbezeichnungen selbstverständlich für alle Geschlechter. Hartwig Schuck: Diplomsoziologe, promoviert zum Thema ‚Power Revisited: Realistische Machttheorie und Herrschaftskritik‘ an der Universität Paderborn., E ˗ Mail: hartwig.schuck@dissens.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2014; 41(1): 298–324
警方认为你凶社会科学已经超过标准Highly controversial however, is the notion of‚objective”interests,尤其是is often criticized as恼" determinist and reductionist .开发商的情况如何?■This article reconstructs objective and subjective facets of‚东丹”和develops a multi-dimensional, critical务实维持of‚声明”,‚ethical”和‚positional’interests的is intended to捕捉论文facets .因此，多方的讨论是有重要的建议和意见的。我要感谢匿名评论者安德烈亚斯·格伦内瓦尔德、乌尔斯·林纳、因戈·埃尔贝、汀·阳光堡、马丁·弗莱斯、纳丁·泰勒约翰、麦德彦、迈克尔·舒克、弗瑞德·斯托尔沃尔夫等。为了提高可读性，接下来不能同时使用男性和女性。尽管如此，所有的个人化特征都当然适用于各个性别。Hartwig Schuck: Diplomsoziologe‚力量Revisited:现实Machttheorie获得博士学位,并认真Herrschaftskritik’大学Paderborn .邮件˗:hartwig.schuck@dissens.de重要期刊上发表的2014年Sozialtheorie和哲学;41 (1): 298-324
{"title":"Wie objektiv sind Interessen?","authors":"Hartwig Schuck","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0011","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of interests is almost ubiquitous in critical social science. Highly controversial, however, is the notion of ‚objective‘ interests, which is often criticized as being determinist and reductionist. The flip-side tendency of developing a purely subjectivist account of interests turns out to be no less problematic. This article reconstructs objective and subjective facets of ‚interest‘ and develops a multi-dimensional, critical realist conception of ‚manifest‘, ‚ethical‘ and ‚positional‘ interests which is intended to capture these facets. Such a multi-dimensio1 Fürwertvolle Anregungen, Kritik undDiskussionen danke ich der anonymenGutachterin sowie Andreas Grünewald, Urs Lindner, Ingo Elbe, Tine Sonnenburg, Martin Fries, Nadine Telljohann, Dimitri Mader, Michael Schuck und Frieder OttoWolf. Aus Gründen der besseren Lesbarkeit wird hier und im Folgenden auf die gleichzeitige Verwendung männlicher und weiblicher Sprachformen verzichtet. Gleichwohl gelten sämtliche Personenbezeichnungen selbstverständlich für alle Geschlechter. Hartwig Schuck: Diplomsoziologe, promoviert zum Thema ‚Power Revisited: Realistische Machttheorie und Herrschaftskritik‘ an der Universität Paderborn., E ˗ Mail: hartwig.schuck@dissens.de Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2014; 41(1): 298–324","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134456607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The connection between technology and society today remains as compelling as in Le Corbusier's time, with views from social commentators, scientists and economists habitually polarising around the adverse or positive impact of technological change. Tracing the roots of computation and robotics back to the Second World War, Philippe Morel of EZCT Architecture & Design Research redefines the position of artificial intelligence, robots and computation in architecture, highlighting the potential of computers to perform precise calculations – and outperform human intelligence in almost every way.
{"title":"Computation or Revolution","authors":"P. Morel","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2016-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2016-0004","url":null,"abstract":"The connection between technology and society today remains as compelling as in Le Corbusier's time, with views from social commentators, scientists and economists habitually polarising around the adverse or positive impact of technological change. Tracing the roots of computation and robotics back to the Second World War, Philippe Morel of EZCT Architecture & Design Research redefines the position of artificial intelligence, robots and computation in architecture, highlighting the potential of computers to perform precise calculations – and outperform human intelligence in almost every way.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"82 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120975162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
By a critical view on the analogies of organism and artefact, artificial and natural selection, competition as mechanism of evolution and economy, an advanced analysis of biologism is presented: organisms are in themselves purposefully organised, without, as their cause, assuming a subject setting the purpose. The capitalist society organises itself following economic rules that suit the purpose of valorisation of value, without the subjects of this society knowingly having planned and enforced this. The unconscious society and the unplanned organisms both appear purpose-built, therefore they seem apprehensible by an identical principle. Biology and sociology become systematically indistinguishable.
{"title":"Biologie und Ideologie des Homo sapiens","authors":"Christine Zunke","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0002","url":null,"abstract":"By a critical view on the analogies of organism and artefact, artificial and natural selection, competition as mechanism of evolution and economy, an advanced analysis of biologism is presented: organisms are in themselves purposefully organised, without, as their cause, assuming a subject setting the purpose. The capitalist society organises itself following economic rules that suit the purpose of valorisation of value, without the subjects of this society knowingly having planned and enforced this. The unconscious society and the unplanned organisms both appear purpose-built, therefore they seem apprehensible by an identical principle. Biology and sociology become systematically indistinguishable.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133904292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：