Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2509-9485-2021-1-1
{"title":"Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis","authors":"","doi":"10.5771/2509-9485-2021-1-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2021-1-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":251983,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133980910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2509-9485-2021-2-326
Dietrich Thränhardt
Die europäischen Asylsysteme werden oft als ›Lotterie‹ kritisiert, weil Asylentscheidungen zwischen Ländern, Regionen und Gerichten extrem differieren und die Antragsteller Jahre auf endgültige Klärung warten. Um schnelle und gute Entscheidungen zu ermöglichen, hat die Schweiz ein strukturiertes Asylverfahren mit unabhängiger Rechtsberatung entwickelt. Deutschland und andere Länder wollen Asylbewerber:innen in der Anhörung nicht rechtlich stärken. Offiziell halten sie am internationalen und europäischen Asylrecht fest, erwarten jedoch von den Asylentscheider:innen niedrige positive Quoten. In Ländern mit unabhängigen Gerichten werden derartige behördliche Entscheidungen aber vielfach aufgehoben und die Gerichte gewähren schließlich Asyl. Solch doppelbödige Praxis führt zu humanitären Härten und hohen finanziellen Kosten und erweckt den Eindruck eines Kontrollverlustes.
{"title":"Lotteries. The Ambivalent European Asylum Regime and How to Fix It. Credibility and Effectiveness of Asylum Decisions in Europe","authors":"Dietrich Thränhardt","doi":"10.5771/2509-9485-2021-2-326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2021-2-326","url":null,"abstract":"Die europäischen Asylsysteme werden oft als ›Lotterie‹ kritisiert, weil Asylentscheidungen zwischen Ländern, Regionen und Gerichten extrem differieren und die Antragsteller Jahre auf endgültige Klärung warten. Um schnelle und gute Entscheidungen zu ermöglichen, hat die Schweiz ein strukturiertes Asylverfahren mit unabhängiger Rechtsberatung entwickelt. Deutschland und andere Länder wollen Asylbewerber:innen in der Anhörung nicht rechtlich stärken. Offiziell halten sie am internationalen und europäischen Asylrecht fest, erwarten jedoch von den Asylentscheider:innen niedrige positive Quoten. In Ländern mit unabhängigen Gerichten werden derartige behördliche Entscheidungen aber vielfach aufgehoben und die Gerichte gewähren schließlich Asyl. Solch doppelbödige Praxis führt zu humanitären Härten und hohen finanziellen Kosten und erweckt den Eindruck eines Kontrollverlustes.","PeriodicalId":251983,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115282354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-201
Valentin Feneberg
{"title":"Herausforderungen der Definition. Sammelrezension zur multidisziplinären Debatte um den Begriff des ›Flüchtlings‹","authors":"Valentin Feneberg","doi":"10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-201","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":251983,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114693345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-4
Valentin Feneberg, Petra Sussner
The international order is based on the fundamental belief that nation-states can control access to their territories. Asylum law puts this logic into perspective by guaranteeing fair procedures to those seeking protection and, if accepted, basic civil and social rights. Asylum practice thus operates in a tension between universal human rights and migration control, part of which is the categorization of people according to their needs for protection. International and national courts are key actors mediating this tension. By applying and interpreting the law, they contribute to the dynamic evolution of both substantial and procedural asylum law. The aim of this special issue is to empirically analyse the legal practice of categorization from different disciplinary perspectives and thus contribute to interdisciplinary asylum law research.
{"title":"Courts in Context. An Empirical Re-Evaluation of Categorization in the Asylum Regime","authors":"Valentin Feneberg, Petra Sussner","doi":"10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2509-9485-2023-1-4","url":null,"abstract":"The international order is based on the fundamental belief that nation-states can control access to their territories. Asylum law puts this logic into perspective by guaranteeing fair procedures to those seeking protection and, if accepted, basic civil and social rights. Asylum practice thus operates in a tension between universal human rights and migration control, part of which is the categorization of people according to their needs for protection. International and national courts are key actors mediating this tension. By applying and interpreting the law, they contribute to the dynamic evolution of both substantial and procedural asylum law. The aim of this special issue is to empirically analyse the legal practice of categorization from different disciplinary perspectives and thus contribute to interdisciplinary asylum law research.","PeriodicalId":251983,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung","volume":"12 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113984593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：