{"title":"Luxemburg locuta, causa finita! Zum zeitlichen Anwendungsbereich der Rom II-Verordnung","authors":"Martin Illmer","doi":"10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.82","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130964438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Materiellrechtliche Einwendungen bei der grenzüberschreitenden Vollstreckung und die Konsequenzen von „Prism Investment“ – Teil I","authors":"Caroline Meller-Hannich","doi":"10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.90","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.90","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131365471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-02-24DOI: 10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.11a
Gianni Santucci
Javier Paricio, Roman law professor at Complutense University in Madrid, has been successful in the difficult undertaking to stress in a simple, but very precise way the Roman law tradition and its importance for the legal European education today. The book consists of a prologue and six chapters of which the first, El legado juridíco de Roma (pp.19-48) and the second, Presente y futuro del derecho romano (pp. 49-65) are longer than the others. In the first chapter, Paricio outlines the double life of Roman law (“la doble vida del derecho romano”). Every scholar of Roman law knows that “Roman law” is a word with distinct meanings: Roman law as the Roman law of the ancient Romans; or as ius commune in theMiddle Ages and later, or as Pandectist school (the second and the third life of Roman law). Particular attention is devoted to the Roman law of the ancient Romans (the “Roman Roman law”). The role of jurists in the development of Roman law of the classical period (III century B.C.III century A.D.) is of extraordinary importance and classical Roman law is acknowledged as an “open” jurisprudential system, characterized by casuistry. Paricio rightly emphasizes this model which continues to fascinate modern scholars who appreciate the flexibility of this system and the equity inherent to bonum et aequum in individual cases. The Roman jurists (and the praetor) could make ius in a very creative and remarkable way, as their activity was based on a recognized concept of ius (ars boni et aequi) which could guarantee to society a certain level of coherence and predictability about the law that could be applied without using, even minimally, the letter of the statute law (“el pueblo del derecho, no es el pueblo de la ley”: Schulz). The influence of Roman law in the modern and contemporary world has been very important: Roman law, in fact, constitutes the historical and conceptual basis of many legal systems throughout the world, and Roman law helps us to understand our European legal culture. Paricio outlines the second and the third life of Roman law in Europe, from ius commune to Savigny and the beginning of historical legal schoolarship in the nineteenth century, paying a particular attention to the phenomenon of reception in Germany. In the second chapter, Paricio, taking up in part the ideas already expressed in a previous essay (El derecho romano en la encrucijada, Madrid, 2001), insists on the importance of the historical study of Roman law as the fundamental basis of the education of European jurists. However, Paricio also stresses, in a very honest way, the present crisis of Roman law teaching in Europe today. This crisis is evident in different ways, for example in Spain (different from (Germany and Holland) there has been an increase in the number of teachers of Roman law, which has not been balance by an increase in the quality of Roman law research and teaching. In the other briefer chapters, Paricio touches on some fundamental concepts regardi
马德里康普顿斯大学(Complutense University)的罗马法教授哈维尔·帕里西奥(Javier Paricio)成功地以一种简单但非常精确的方式强调了罗马法传统及其对当今欧洲法律教育的重要性。这本书由序言和六章组成，其中第一章“El legado juridíco de Roma”(第19-48页)和第二章“Presente y futuro del derecho romano”(第49-65页)比其他章节都要长。在第一章中，帕里西奥概述了罗马法的双重生活(“la doble vida del derecho romano”)。每个研究罗马法的学者都知道，“罗马法”是一个有着不同含义的词:罗马法是古罗马人的罗马法;或中世纪及以后的ius commune，或泛论学派(罗马法的第二和第三生命)。特别关注的是古罗马人的罗马法(“罗马罗马法”)。法学家在古典时期(公元前三世纪至公元三世纪)罗马法的发展中发挥了极其重要的作用，古典罗马法被公认为是一个“开放的”法学体系，其特点是诡辩。帕里西奥正确地强调了这一模式，这一模式继续吸引着现代学者，他们欣赏这一制度的灵活性和在个别情况下“以物代物”所固有的公平。罗马法学家(和裁判官)可以以一种非常有创造性和非凡的方式制定法律，因为他们的活动是基于公认的法律概念(ars boni et aequi)，这可以保证社会对法律有一定程度的连贯性和可预测性，可以在不使用，甚至最低限度地使用成文法的字母的情况下适用(“el pueblo del derecho, no es el pueblo de la ley”:Schulz)。罗马法在现当代世界的影响是非常重要的:事实上，罗马法构成了世界上许多法律制度的历史和概念基础，罗马法帮助我们理解我们的欧洲法律文化。帕里西奥概述了罗马法在欧洲的第二和第三个生命，从乌斯公社到萨维尼，以及19世纪历史法学研究的开始，他特别关注了德国的接受现象。在第二章中，Paricio部分采纳了之前一篇文章(El derecho romano en la encrucijada，马德里，2001)中已经表达的观点，坚持罗马法的历史研究作为欧洲法学家教育的基本基础的重要性。然而，Paricio也以一种非常诚实的方式强调，当今欧洲罗马法教学的危机。这种危机以不同的方式表现出来，例如在西班牙(与德国和荷兰不同)，罗马法教师的数量有所增加，但罗马法研究和教学质量的提高并没有平衡这一点。在其他较短的章节中，帕里西奥触及了一些关于罗马法创造性的基本概念。例如，这是罗马民主和争议法的概念(“ius controversum”)，其中Paricio呼吁学者注意罗马法学家提出的矛盾观点对进一步理解古典法的意义。该书以西班牙罗马法权威学者胡安·伊格莱西亚斯的肖像收尾。这本书包含参考文献索引和来源索引。
{"title":"Rezension zu Paricio, El legado juridíco de Roma","authors":"Gianni Santucci","doi":"10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.11a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.11a","url":null,"abstract":"Javier Paricio, Roman law professor at Complutense University in Madrid, has been successful in the difficult undertaking to stress in a simple, but very precise way the Roman law tradition and its importance for the legal European education today. The book consists of a prologue and six chapters of which the first, El legado juridíco de Roma (pp.19-48) and the second, Presente y futuro del derecho romano (pp. 49-65) are longer than the others. In the first chapter, Paricio outlines the double life of Roman law (“la doble vida del derecho romano”). Every scholar of Roman law knows that “Roman law” is a word with distinct meanings: Roman law as the Roman law of the ancient Romans; or as ius commune in theMiddle Ages and later, or as Pandectist school (the second and the third life of Roman law). Particular attention is devoted to the Roman law of the ancient Romans (the “Roman Roman law”). The role of jurists in the development of Roman law of the classical period (III century B.C.III century A.D.) is of extraordinary importance and classical Roman law is acknowledged as an “open” jurisprudential system, characterized by casuistry. Paricio rightly emphasizes this model which continues to fascinate modern scholars who appreciate the flexibility of this system and the equity inherent to bonum et aequum in individual cases. The Roman jurists (and the praetor) could make ius in a very creative and remarkable way, as their activity was based on a recognized concept of ius (ars boni et aequi) which could guarantee to society a certain level of coherence and predictability about the law that could be applied without using, even minimally, the letter of the statute law (“el pueblo del derecho, no es el pueblo de la ley”: Schulz). The influence of Roman law in the modern and contemporary world has been very important: Roman law, in fact, constitutes the historical and conceptual basis of many legal systems throughout the world, and Roman law helps us to understand our European legal culture. Paricio outlines the second and the third life of Roman law in Europe, from ius commune to Savigny and the beginning of historical legal schoolarship in the nineteenth century, paying a particular attention to the phenomenon of reception in Germany. In the second chapter, Paricio, taking up in part the ideas already expressed in a previous essay (El derecho romano en la encrucijada, Madrid, 2001), insists on the importance of the historical study of Roman law as the fundamental basis of the education of European jurists. However, Paricio also stresses, in a very honest way, the present crisis of Roman law teaching in Europe today. This crisis is evident in different ways, for example in Spain (different from (Germany and Holland) there has been an increase in the number of teachers of Roman law, which has not been balance by an increase in the quality of Roman law research and teaching. In the other briefer chapters, Paricio touches on some fundamental concepts regardi","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123017879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ὕστερον πρότερον. Das Spätere zuerst","authors":"M. Schmidt-Kessel","doi":"10.1515/GPR.2012.9.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/GPR.2012.9.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122608740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Der Kommissionsentwurf zur Reform der Brüssel I-VO","authors":"Matthias Weller","doi":"10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.34","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131063805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Als das Europäische Parlament zu Beginn des Jahres 2011 die sog. Patientenrechte-Richtlinie angenommen hatte, war unter den Parlamentariern die Erleichterung groß. „Wir haben“, so Peter Liese, der gesundheitspolitische Sprecher der EVP-Fraktion im Europäischen Parlament, „nach einer wirklich schweren Geburt ein Baby zur Welt gebracht. Dieses muss gepflegt werden, damit es wächst und gedeiht.“ Wer sich mit Fragen des Gesundheitsrechts beschäftigt, schreckt, wenn er von einer schweren Geburt hört, unwillkürlich auf, denn geburtshilfliche Vorgänge sind die haftungsträchtigsten Ereignisse des Gesundheitswesens, bei denen leider einiges schief gehen kann. Dass ein Neugeborenes nach den Strapazen einer schweren Geburt besonderer Pflege bedarf, steht außer Frage, es ist mitunter in einem dramatischen Zustand. Der bildhafte Vergleich ist also bei näherem Hinsehen nicht unproblematisch. Nun wäre es gewiss übertrieben zu behaupten: „Nichts ist gut in der Patientenrechte-Richtlinie“, aber was warum an ihr gut ist, was sie womöglich verbessert hat oder verbessern wird, ist aus meiner Sicht so leicht gar nicht zu sagen.
{"title":"Die Patientenrechte-Richtlinie als „Dienstleistungsrichtlinie des Gesundheitswesens“?","authors":"S. Rixen","doi":"10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.45","url":null,"abstract":"Als das Europäische Parlament zu Beginn des Jahres 2011 die sog. Patientenrechte-Richtlinie angenommen hatte, war unter den Parlamentariern die Erleichterung groß. „Wir haben“, so Peter Liese, der gesundheitspolitische Sprecher der EVP-Fraktion im Europäischen Parlament, „nach einer wirklich schweren Geburt ein Baby zur Welt gebracht. Dieses muss gepflegt werden, damit es wächst und gedeiht.“ Wer sich mit Fragen des Gesundheitsrechts beschäftigt, schreckt, wenn er von einer schweren Geburt hört, unwillkürlich auf, denn geburtshilfliche Vorgänge sind die haftungsträchtigsten Ereignisse des Gesundheitswesens, bei denen leider einiges schief gehen kann. Dass ein Neugeborenes nach den Strapazen einer schweren Geburt besonderer Pflege bedarf, steht außer Frage, es ist mitunter in einem dramatischen Zustand. Der bildhafte Vergleich ist also bei näherem Hinsehen nicht unproblematisch. Nun wäre es gewiss übertrieben zu behaupten: „Nichts ist gut in der Patientenrechte-Richtlinie“, aber was warum an ihr gut ist, was sie womöglich verbessert hat oder verbessern wird, ist aus meiner Sicht so leicht gar nicht zu sagen.","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116253953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Information über die Verwendung des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Kaufrechts. Gedanken zum Harmonisierungskonzept","authors":"Karl Riesenhuber","doi":"10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2012.9.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115406756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Die Vollstreckbarerklärung von Ordnungsgeldbeschlüssen gemäß § 890 ZPO nach der EuGVVO","authors":"David-Christoph Bittmann","doi":"10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.84","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127368469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Europäisches Notariat und nationale Rechtskulturen","authors":"Stephan Matyk","doi":"10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/GPR.2012.9.2.53","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273842,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127989480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：