Pub Date : 2012-01-01DOI: 10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2012.006
Mathias Rodatz
Urban administrations in Germany have been governing districts as “concentrations of foreigners”, problematizing them as signs of disintegration and urban decay and introducing policies aiming at their dissolution. Recently, however, programs of city development and migration policy are suggesting that German cities should give up their policies of desegregation and start to view migrant districts as productive sites of “diversity” featuring resources for the “local economy” and “civil society”. The paper argues that the effects of this shift in policies may be twofold: on the one hand, neoliberal forms of governance result in the delegetimization of national-social (i.e. ethno-centric) conceptions of urban order and thereby of a systematic notion of urban state-racism in Germany. On the other hand the details of the new strategies show how the conceptions of “ethnicity”, migrant “networks” or “economies” are to be managed as orders of resources and risks. Under these conditions of neoliberalization, “diversity” may spell out an uncertainty of urban belonging for specific categories of “migrant communities”, whose otherness must continuously be proven not to be a risk to the neighborhood, but a means of productivity.
{"title":"Produktive „Parallelgesellschaften“. Migration und Ordnung in der (neoliberalen) „Stadt der Vielfalt“. Productive „Parallel Societies“. Migration and Order in the (neoliberal) „City of Diversity“","authors":"Mathias Rodatz","doi":"10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2012.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2012.006","url":null,"abstract":"Urban administrations in Germany have been governing districts as “concentrations of foreigners”, problematizing them as signs of disintegration and urban decay and introducing policies aiming at their dissolution. Recently, however, programs of city development and migration policy are suggesting that German cities should give up their policies of desegregation and start to view migrant districts as productive sites of “diversity” featuring resources for the “local economy” and “civil society”. The paper argues that the effects of this shift in policies may be twofold: on the one hand, neoliberal forms of governance result in the delegetimization of national-social (i.e. ethno-centric) conceptions of urban order and thereby of a systematic notion of urban state-racism in Germany. On the other hand the details of the new strategies show how the conceptions of “ethnicity”, migrant “networks” or “economies” are to be managed as orders of resources and risks. Under these conditions of neoliberalization, “diversity” may spell out an uncertainty of urban belonging for specific categories of “migrant communities”, whose otherness must continuously be proven not to be a risk to the neighborhood, but a means of productivity.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74371128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-11-01DOI: 10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.3.659
D. Thomä
This article examines three different ways of establishing connections between political models and the realm of the family. It scrutinizes and criticizes the patriarchal homology between political and private father figures (Filmer vs. Locke), casts light on the political bearings of sympathetic rela- tions which are modeled based on maternal love (Adam Smith and Condorcet), and examines the revolutionary ideal of fraternity (Friedrich Schiller). The author distinguishes symbolic (paternal), synergetic (fraternal) and sympathetic relations and analyzes their bearings for modern democracies. He takes issue with the liberal separation between the private and the political, as it tends to lose sight of the marked correspondences between these spheres. He also questions the conservative idea of a family compensating for the discontent in the public realm. Gender concepts and generational issues turn out to be intertwined with theories of the political.
{"title":"Das Private ist politisch, das Politische ist privat. Korrespondenzen zwischen familiärer und staatlicher Ordnung im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert – und heute","authors":"D. Thomä","doi":"10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.3.659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.3.659","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines three different ways of establishing connections between political models and the realm of the family. It scrutinizes and criticizes the patriarchal homology between political and private father figures (Filmer vs. Locke), casts light on the political bearings of sympathetic rela- tions which are modeled based on maternal love (Adam Smith and Condorcet), and examines the revolutionary ideal of fraternity (Friedrich Schiller). The author distinguishes symbolic (paternal), synergetic (fraternal) and sympathetic relations and analyzes their bearings for modern democracies. He takes issue with the liberal separation between the private and the political, as it tends to lose sight of the marked correspondences between these spheres. He also questions the conservative idea of a family compensating for the discontent in the public realm. Gender concepts and generational issues turn out to be intertwined with theories of the political.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"23-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-11-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660
P. Kahn
This article illuminates the puzzling gap between political theory and political imagination. Theory is dominated by liberalism and its insistence on interests, reason, rights, individualism, and the social contract. Movies - and the social imaginations of the political they mirror - turn out to be completely different: Instead of interests, we find love, instead of the contract, we find sacrifice, and instead of the individual, we find the family. Turning to film therefore reveals liberal theory to suffer from a failure of the imagination.
{"title":"Liebe, Unschuld und der Staat. Liebe und Politik: Was die politische Theorie vom Kino lernen kann","authors":"P. Kahn","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.3.660","url":null,"abstract":"This article illuminates the puzzling gap between political theory and political imagination. Theory is dominated by liberalism and its insistence on interests, reason, rights, individualism, and the social contract. Movies - and the social imaginations of the political they mirror - turn out to be completely different: Instead of interests, we find love, instead of the contract, we find sacrifice, and instead of the individual, we find the family. Turning to film therefore reveals liberal theory to suffer from a failure of the imagination.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"57-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-09-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.763
Sven Optiz
Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory, this article approaches the legal exception through an analysis of conflicting temporalities. According to Luhmann, each subsystem of society possesses a specific mode of relating to past and future events. Law has a specific temporality that is characterized by its orientation to the past: it deals with deeds done in light of laws already set in place. Luhmann suggests that considerations of future risks are at odds with the temporality of law. Following this idea, it will be argued that future orientated measures such as preventive detention and the doctrine of preemptive warfare introduce the legal exception into law itself. Both cases exhibit different rationalities of relating to an uncertain, potentially threatening futures that collide with law’s proper temporality. Whereas preventive detention relies on the 19th century idea of the probable crime as incorporated into a ‘dangerous individual’, the preemptive strike thrives on the post-probabilistic anticipation of the unexpected. Both measures indicate the erosion of law’s capacity to sustain an indifferent attitude towards the future. Consequently, both measures thwart law’s retroactivity, albeit in different ways. They articulate a counter-legal temporality within law – and thereby disrupt the legal system.
{"title":"Widerstreitende Temporalitäten: Recht in Zeiten des Risikos","authors":"Sven Optiz","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.763","url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory, this article approaches the legal exception through an analysis of conflicting temporalities. According to Luhmann, each subsystem of society possesses a specific mode of relating to past and future events. Law has a specific temporality that is characterized by its orientation to the past: it deals with deeds done in light of laws already set in place. Luhmann suggests that considerations of future risks are at odds with the temporality of law. Following this idea, it will be argued that future orientated measures such as preventive detention and the doctrine of preemptive warfare introduce the legal exception into law itself. Both cases exhibit different rationalities of relating to an uncertain, potentially threatening futures that collide with law’s proper temporality. Whereas preventive detention relies on the 19th century idea of the probable crime as incorporated into a ‘dangerous individual’, the preemptive strike thrives on the post-probabilistic anticipation of the unexpected. Both measures indicate the erosion of law’s capacity to sustain an indifferent attitude towards the future. Consequently, both measures thwart law’s retroactivity, albeit in different ways. They articulate a counter-legal temporality within law – and thereby disrupt the legal system.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"58-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-09-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.764
Katharina Eisch-Angus
Through ethnographic encounters and interviews in English middle-class neighbourhoods and institutions, such as schools or the police, Katharina Eisch-Angus traces the concepts of ‘safety’ and ‘security’ concentrating particularly on their associations with the idea and practice of ‘community’ and the ways in which they are disseminated within everyday realities. Emerging systems of governmental control gain an irrefutable persuasiveness by coupling the necessity of safeguarding private spheres with public security demands and by referring to a mentality of personal civic responsibility and charity. In everyday narratives and on-going public debates – from issues of health and safety or neighbourhood crime, to the threat of paedophiles – suggestive fear and everyday experience, reason and absurdity interlock, whilst also opening up space for resistance and alternative decisions.
{"title":"\"You Can´t Argue with Security.\" The Communication and Practica of Everyday Safeguarding in the Society of Security","authors":"Katharina Eisch-Angus","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.764","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.764","url":null,"abstract":"Through ethnographic encounters and interviews in English middle-class neighbourhoods and institutions, such as schools or the police, Katharina Eisch-Angus traces the concepts of ‘safety’ and ‘security’ concentrating particularly on their associations with the idea and practice of ‘community’ and the ways in which they are disseminated within everyday realities. Emerging systems of governmental control gain an irrefutable persuasiveness by coupling the necessity of safeguarding private spheres with public security demands and by referring to a mentality of personal civic responsibility and charity. In everyday narratives and on-going public debates – from issues of health and safety or neighbourhood crime, to the threat of paedophiles – suggestive fear and everyday experience, reason and absurdity interlock, whilst also opening up space for resistance and alternative decisions.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"83-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-09-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.766
Axel Rüdiger
From within the environment of the Prussian reforms at the beginning of the 19th century, Friedrich Buchholz developed the social-scientific concept of Zukunftspolitik, which deals with the constitutional safeguard of public credit and the prevention of destructive revolution through targeted political reforms. In contrast to political romanticism (Adam Muller and others), Buchholz orients himself not toward the English system of representation, but toward the French model, to combine revolutionary popular sovereignty with representative government. Using the example of English public debt in the 18th century, he develops the political dialectic of materialist necessity and arbitrary contingency. Whereas sovereignty without representation in the maintenance of public credit inevitably leads to Jacobin Terror, parliamentarian representation without sovereignty leads to, in the English model, a general state of war. Europe’s future, according to Buchholz, thus depends on the reform of English Parliamentarianism.
{"title":"Staatsschuld, Verfassung und Revolutionsprävention: Friedrich Buchholz und der Beginn der Sozialwissenschaft","authors":"Axel Rüdiger","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.2.766","url":null,"abstract":"From within the environment of the Prussian reforms at the beginning of the 19th century, Friedrich Buchholz developed the social-scientific concept of Zukunftspolitik, which deals with the constitutional safeguard of public credit and the prevention of destructive revolution through targeted political reforms. In contrast to political romanticism (Adam Muller and others), Buchholz orients himself not toward the English system of representation, but toward the French model, to combine revolutionary popular sovereignty with representative government. Using the example of English public debt in the 18th century, he develops the political dialectic of materialist necessity and arbitrary contingency. Whereas sovereignty without representation in the maintenance of public credit inevitably leads to Jacobin Terror, parliamentarian representation without sovereignty leads to, in the English model, a general state of war. Europe’s future, according to Buchholz, thus depends on the reform of English Parliamentarianism.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"127-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-09-01DOI: 10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.2.765
Anne Dölemeyer
This paper deals with ‘planning’ and ‘prevention’ as two logics or rationalities of recovery planning. A brief case study on recovery planning in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina has shown how, in a situation of destruction, disorientation and uncertainty, recovery planning was intended to create the impression of a reliable framing for individual decision making on return and reconstruction. Here, planning appeared as pro-active design, with flood prevention as a necessary and centrally assessable element. However, in the course of time and within a number of successive planning processes, it was precisely the attempt to model New Orleans’ future on a centralized, expertise- driven approach of reconstruction that provoked strong criticism. Consequently, dynamics shifted from expertise-centered recovery planning to a more de-centralized mode that stressed citizen participation, ‘lay knowledge’ and inclusion, re-defined what New Orleans should look like in the future, as well as the role and the meaning of ‘(flood) prevention’.
{"title":"Planen ohne Risiko: New Orleans und der Wiederaufbau nach Katrina","authors":"Anne Dölemeyer","doi":"10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.2.765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/behemoth.2011.4.2.765","url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with ‘planning’ and ‘prevention’ as two logics or rationalities of recovery planning. A brief case study on recovery planning in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina has shown how, in a situation of destruction, disorientation and uncertainty, recovery planning was intended to create the impression of a reliable framing for individual decision making on return and reconstruction. Here, planning appeared as pro-active design, with flood prevention as a necessary and centrally assessable element. However, in the course of time and within a number of successive planning processes, it was precisely the attempt to model New Orleans’ future on a centralized, expertise- driven approach of reconstruction that provoked strong criticism. Consequently, dynamics shifted from expertise-centered recovery planning to a more de-centralized mode that stressed citizen participation, ‘lay knowledge’ and inclusion, re-defined what New Orleans should look like in the future, as well as the role and the meaning of ‘(flood) prevention’.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"107-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-04-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.675
J. Okely
Decades after embarking on research among Gypsies, I examine that earlier context when there was little published discussion of participant observation practice. Snatched advice and rare texts suggested an open-ended approach rather than limited hypothesis. The anthropologist's first weeks of chronological narrative without selection of relevance, vindicate a holistic perspective. Details reveal themes prophetically to emerge as central. There are glimpses of individuals who were to play continuing or passing, dramatic roles in the years to come. Fieldnotes both reveal and conceal. Entwined with experience and analysis, they are later transformed as texts. Fieldwork reveals embedded systems inaccessible through the quantifiable. The ‘merely anecdotal’, so maligned by positivism, has the grounded potential, as explored here, for theoretical and ethnographic overviews, beyond place and time, in this case, residence on one Gypsy encampment during the first few weeks.
{"title":"Retrospective Reading of Fieldnotes. Living on Gypsy Camps","authors":"J. Okely","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.675","url":null,"abstract":"Decades after embarking on research among Gypsies, I examine that earlier context when there was little published discussion of participant observation practice. Snatched advice and rare texts suggested an open-ended approach rather than limited hypothesis. The anthropologist's first weeks of chronological narrative without selection of relevance, vindicate a holistic perspective. Details reveal themes prophetically to emerge as central. There are glimpses of individuals who were to play continuing or passing, dramatic roles in the years to come. Fieldnotes both reveal and conceal. Entwined with experience and analysis, they are later transformed as texts. Fieldwork reveals embedded systems inaccessible through the quantifiable. The ‘merely anecdotal’, so maligned by positivism, has the grounded potential, as explored here, for theoretical and ethnographic overviews, beyond place and time, in this case, residence on one Gypsy encampment during the first few weeks.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"18-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-04-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.676
P. Williams
To all Gypsy groups the factum is common, that they are firmly enclosed by a society, from which they want to keep distance. Analyzing the relations between this communities and the larger society meets tendencies of amalgamating as well as tendencies of separating. Among the latter the originality and creativity in putting together the ‘own culture’ are striking, so that a permanent signiflcat of distance (Gypsy identity) is opposed to flexible significants of distancing (cultural traits), which are often transformed elements of the majority culture.
{"title":"Ethnologie der Zigeuner. Von der Begegnung zur Theoriebildung","authors":"P. Williams","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.676","url":null,"abstract":"To all Gypsy groups the factum is common, that they are firmly enclosed by a society, from which they want to keep distance. Analyzing the relations between this communities and the larger society meets tendencies of amalgamating as well as tendencies of separating. Among the latter the originality and creativity in putting together the ‘own culture’ are striking, so that a permanent signiflcat of distance (Gypsy identity) is opposed to flexible significants of distancing (cultural traits), which are often transformed elements of the majority culture.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"43-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2011-04-01DOI: 10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.679
B. Streck
Gypsy Studies (in German: Tsiganologie) on the one side have a long tradition since the 18th century, on the other side it is still difficult to define it between social or cultural anthropology (in German: Ethnologie) and sociology. The Leipzig Forum Tsiganologische Forschung has collected data which can be explained by a paradigm of order and para-order, two systems of thinking and doing closely connected and interdependent, but in an asymmetric way. comparable with the relation of mother and daughter. Whereas anthropology tries to understand what sometimes is described as the recent losers of the civilization process, Gypsies represent a traditional skill of being marginalized, a certain way of mastering para-orders, which could be relevant for all other "overrolled" communities.
{"title":"Ethnologie und Tsiganologie. Warum studieren wir „überrollte\" Kulturen?","authors":"B. Streck","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2011.4.1.679","url":null,"abstract":"Gypsy Studies (in German: Tsiganologie) on the one side have a long tradition since the 18th century, on the other side it is still difficult to define it between social or cultural anthropology (in German: Ethnologie) and sociology. The Leipzig Forum Tsiganologische Forschung has collected data which can be explained by a paradigm of order and para-order, two systems of thinking and doing closely connected and interdependent, but in an asymmetric way. comparable with the relation of mother and daughter. Whereas anthropology tries to understand what sometimes is described as the recent losers of the civilization process, Gypsies represent a traditional skill of being marginalized, a certain way of mastering para-orders, which could be relevant for all other \"overrolled\" communities.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"4 1","pages":"106-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71271504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：