The European Union classifies “novel foods” as those not widely consumed before 15 May 1997. This category includes recently created, innovative foods, as well as those made using new technologies and processes, and foods with a traditional consumption history outside the EU. Distinguishing between “novel” and “conventional” foods is legally significant, as the former require official authorization under the Novel Foods Regulation. The regulation prioritizes safety, accurate labeling, and nutritional parity with replaced foods. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, effective from 1 January 2018, replaced prior regulations, facilitating access to the EU market for novel and innovative foods while maintaining high safety standards. Classifying botanical products as novel can be intricate. Safety assessments for plant products must consider diversity in species, varieties, ecotypes, and chemotypes, as cultivation practices influence chemical composition. The article reviews the legislation applicable to botanicals and proposes different ways to evaluate in advance whether a product is “novel” or not, emphasizing the evaluation of the origin and consumption history of foods of plant origin.
{"title":"Application of the “Novel Foods” Regulation to Botanicals in the European Union","authors":"Javier Morán, Alina Kilasoniya","doi":"10.3390/laws13010010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010010","url":null,"abstract":"The European Union classifies “novel foods” as those not widely consumed before 15 May 1997. This category includes recently created, innovative foods, as well as those made using new technologies and processes, and foods with a traditional consumption history outside the EU. Distinguishing between “novel” and “conventional” foods is legally significant, as the former require official authorization under the Novel Foods Regulation. The regulation prioritizes safety, accurate labeling, and nutritional parity with replaced foods. Regulation (EU) 2015/2283, effective from 1 January 2018, replaced prior regulations, facilitating access to the EU market for novel and innovative foods while maintaining high safety standards. Classifying botanical products as novel can be intricate. Safety assessments for plant products must consider diversity in species, varieties, ecotypes, and chemotypes, as cultivation practices influence chemical composition. The article reviews the legislation applicable to botanicals and proposes different ways to evaluate in advance whether a product is “novel” or not, emphasizing the evaluation of the origin and consumption history of foods of plant origin.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139961074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A growing number of states have responded to negative trends in civic knowledge, trust, and engagement by creating new institutes or schools at state universities, with the express aim of reinvigorating civic education and thoughtful, engaged citizenship. In seeking to increase civic knowledge, champion viewpoint diversity, model civil discussion of ideas, combat polarization, and embrace the civic responsibilities of higher education, these institutes can be seen as carrying forward the American founders’ vision of civic education, the moral foundations of law and constitutionalism, and the constitutional principles of free speech and federalism.
{"title":"A Renaissance of Civic Education and Civic Engagement in Higher Education in the Spirit of the American Founders and Constitutionalism","authors":"Kody W. Cooper","doi":"10.3390/laws13010008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010008","url":null,"abstract":"A growing number of states have responded to negative trends in civic knowledge, trust, and engagement by creating new institutes or schools at state universities, with the express aim of reinvigorating civic education and thoughtful, engaged citizenship. In seeking to increase civic knowledge, champion viewpoint diversity, model civil discussion of ideas, combat polarization, and embrace the civic responsibilities of higher education, these institutes can be seen as carrying forward the American founders’ vision of civic education, the moral foundations of law and constitutionalism, and the constitutional principles of free speech and federalism.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139861227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article herein examines the case-law interplay between human rights and international investment law. An example of this interplay is the relation of property rights to protection from expropriation. In this study, a conceptual framework is developed, which represents the various ways of case-law interaction between the two disciplines regarding protection of property. This is achieved by using a cross-reference approach, where it is proven that the two legal fields overlap and share these common principles, albeit with their structural differences. This interplay has various dimensions, and this article aims at analysing them and ultimately illustrating that human rights and international investment law are not independent from each other.
{"title":"Protection of Property under Human Rights and International Investment Law: A Case-Law Analysis","authors":"Eleni Gavriil","doi":"10.3390/laws13010006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010006","url":null,"abstract":"The article herein examines the case-law interplay between human rights and international investment law. An example of this interplay is the relation of property rights to protection from expropriation. In this study, a conceptual framework is developed, which represents the various ways of case-law interaction between the two disciplines regarding protection of property. This is achieved by using a cross-reference approach, where it is proven that the two legal fields overlap and share these common principles, albeit with their structural differences. This interplay has various dimensions, and this article aims at analysing them and ultimately illustrating that human rights and international investment law are not independent from each other.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139832365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Cahyadini, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Tasya Safiranita, Muhammad Jaka Hidayat
Digital transformation fuels technological advancement and widespread public use of Internet networks, leading to a growth in digital platform users. This increase is highly likely to boost platform profits by obtaining more insights into user behavior. Additionally, digital platforms generate income through monetization. The purpose of this research is to examine the role and challenges of technology architecture as an instrument of digital tax imposition in Indonesia and to see further the digital tax arrangements in Indonesia and several countries in the world. This research uses a normative juridical approach by examining the norms or rules formulated in law without excluding empirical facts in the field. The results show that the imposition, implementation, and regulation of digital taxes have potential and challenges from various aspects. Their success will depend on the ability to overcome these challenges while maximizing the opportunities of technological architecture to increase digital taxes. Furthermore, to regulate digital tax itself, governments can update and integrate digital tax arrangements, as well as collaborate with other related parties regarding the arrangements or principles used for the imposition of digital tax.
{"title":"Technology Architecture as an Instrument for Digital Taxation","authors":"A. Cahyadini, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Tasya Safiranita, Muhammad Jaka Hidayat","doi":"10.3390/laws13010007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010007","url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation fuels technological advancement and widespread public use of Internet networks, leading to a growth in digital platform users. This increase is highly likely to boost platform profits by obtaining more insights into user behavior. Additionally, digital platforms generate income through monetization. The purpose of this research is to examine the role and challenges of technology architecture as an instrument of digital tax imposition in Indonesia and to see further the digital tax arrangements in Indonesia and several countries in the world. This research uses a normative juridical approach by examining the norms or rules formulated in law without excluding empirical facts in the field. The results show that the imposition, implementation, and regulation of digital taxes have potential and challenges from various aspects. Their success will depend on the ability to overcome these challenges while maximizing the opportunities of technological architecture to increase digital taxes. Furthermore, to regulate digital tax itself, governments can update and integrate digital tax arrangements, as well as collaborate with other related parties regarding the arrangements or principles used for the imposition of digital tax.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139887949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article herein examines the case-law interplay between human rights and international investment law. An example of this interplay is the relation of property rights to protection from expropriation. In this study, a conceptual framework is developed, which represents the various ways of case-law interaction between the two disciplines regarding protection of property. This is achieved by using a cross-reference approach, where it is proven that the two legal fields overlap and share these common principles, albeit with their structural differences. This interplay has various dimensions, and this article aims at analysing them and ultimately illustrating that human rights and international investment law are not independent from each other.
{"title":"Protection of Property under Human Rights and International Investment Law: A Case-Law Analysis","authors":"Eleni Gavriil","doi":"10.3390/laws13010006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010006","url":null,"abstract":"The article herein examines the case-law interplay between human rights and international investment law. An example of this interplay is the relation of property rights to protection from expropriation. In this study, a conceptual framework is developed, which represents the various ways of case-law interaction between the two disciplines regarding protection of property. This is achieved by using a cross-reference approach, where it is proven that the two legal fields overlap and share these common principles, albeit with their structural differences. This interplay has various dimensions, and this article aims at analysing them and ultimately illustrating that human rights and international investment law are not independent from each other.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139892087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Cahyadini, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Tasya Safiranita, Muhammad Jaka Hidayat
Digital transformation fuels technological advancement and widespread public use of Internet networks, leading to a growth in digital platform users. This increase is highly likely to boost platform profits by obtaining more insights into user behavior. Additionally, digital platforms generate income through monetization. The purpose of this research is to examine the role and challenges of technology architecture as an instrument of digital tax imposition in Indonesia and to see further the digital tax arrangements in Indonesia and several countries in the world. This research uses a normative juridical approach by examining the norms or rules formulated in law without excluding empirical facts in the field. The results show that the imposition, implementation, and regulation of digital taxes have potential and challenges from various aspects. Their success will depend on the ability to overcome these challenges while maximizing the opportunities of technological architecture to increase digital taxes. Furthermore, to regulate digital tax itself, governments can update and integrate digital tax arrangements, as well as collaborate with other related parties regarding the arrangements or principles used for the imposition of digital tax.
{"title":"Technology Architecture as an Instrument for Digital Taxation","authors":"A. Cahyadini, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Tasya Safiranita, Muhammad Jaka Hidayat","doi":"10.3390/laws13010007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010007","url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation fuels technological advancement and widespread public use of Internet networks, leading to a growth in digital platform users. This increase is highly likely to boost platform profits by obtaining more insights into user behavior. Additionally, digital platforms generate income through monetization. The purpose of this research is to examine the role and challenges of technology architecture as an instrument of digital tax imposition in Indonesia and to see further the digital tax arrangements in Indonesia and several countries in the world. This research uses a normative juridical approach by examining the norms or rules formulated in law without excluding empirical facts in the field. The results show that the imposition, implementation, and regulation of digital taxes have potential and challenges from various aspects. Their success will depend on the ability to overcome these challenges while maximizing the opportunities of technological architecture to increase digital taxes. Furthermore, to regulate digital tax itself, governments can update and integrate digital tax arrangements, as well as collaborate with other related parties regarding the arrangements or principles used for the imposition of digital tax.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139827953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Barry A. Whaley, Jonathan G. Martinis, Giuseppe F. Pagano, Sara Barthol, Jessica Senzer, Pamela R. Williamson, Peter D. Blanck
Since the passage of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the United States federal government, states, and localities have passed laws and created policies intended to ensure that people with disabilities had full and equal access to public spaces. Nevertheless, more than three decades after the ADA, people with disabilities continue to face architectural and other barriers to community inclusion and participation. This article describes laws, policies, and initiatives that are implemented in the United States at the federal, state, and local levels to address these barriers, examines their effectiveness, and describes the views of advocates working in furtherance of the rights of people with disabilities and the inclusiveness of public spaces. We conclude by providing brief recommendations for ways federal, state, and local governments may ensure people with disabilities have full and equal access to public spaces.
{"title":"The Americans with Disabilities Act and Equal Access to Public Spaces","authors":"Barry A. Whaley, Jonathan G. Martinis, Giuseppe F. Pagano, Sara Barthol, Jessica Senzer, Pamela R. Williamson, Peter D. Blanck","doi":"10.3390/laws13010005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010005","url":null,"abstract":"Since the passage of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the United States federal government, states, and localities have passed laws and created policies intended to ensure that people with disabilities had full and equal access to public spaces. Nevertheless, more than three decades after the ADA, people with disabilities continue to face architectural and other barriers to community inclusion and participation. This article describes laws, policies, and initiatives that are implemented in the United States at the federal, state, and local levels to address these barriers, examines their effectiveness, and describes the views of advocates working in furtherance of the rights of people with disabilities and the inclusiveness of public spaces. We conclude by providing brief recommendations for ways federal, state, and local governments may ensure people with disabilities have full and equal access to public spaces.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139600420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
From the perspective of defuturing design philosophy, this article discusses the close relationship between the growing body of artificial-intelligence (AI) artifacts in the Brazilian Judiciary and the phenomenon of litigiousness therein. Litigiousness has traditionally been tackled through mechanisms that increase productivity and efficiency in case processing, a strategy that has not succeeded in reducing litigiousness, as data make evident. Analyzing data from relevant sources, this article demonstrates that AI artifacts mostly perform tasks related to clustering and mass handling of cases, following the same path dependency. Consequently, they entail risks of judges’ alienation and loss of agency, which can negatively impact citizens’ fundamental rights. Moreover, they defuture; that is, they erase other (preferable) futures. Albeit AI artifacts can play a part in tackling litigiousness, there should be a critical reflection upon futuring and defuturing. Therefore, this article recommends that SoDF—a systemic approach to design that seeks to explore design consequences, futuring and defuturing—be mandatory to any AI design process. Additionally, it proposes continuous judicial monitoring for alienation and loss of agency, as well as investments in judicial education to empower judges to effectively control and supervise AI artifacts. Finally, it suggests a further research agenda.
本文从去污设计哲学的角度出发，讨论了巴西司法机构中日益增多的人工智能（AI）人工制品与其中的诉讼现象之间的密切关系。诉讼率问题历来是通过提高案件处理的生产力和效率的机制来解决的，但正如数据所显示的那样，这一策略并没有成功减少诉讼率。本文分析了相关来源的数据，表明人工智能人工智能主要执行与案件集群和大规模处理相关的任务，遵循相同的路径依赖。因此，它们会带来法官异化和丧失代理权的风险，从而对公民的基本权利产生负面影响。此外，人工智能还具有 "去未来化"（defuture）的特点，即抹杀了其他（更可取的）未来。尽管 AI 人工智能可以在解决诉讼问题方面发挥作用，但我们应该对未来化和去未来化进行批判性反思。因此，本文建议，SoDF--一种系统性的设计方法，旨在探索设计后果、未来性和违宪性--应成为任何人工智能设计过程的必修课。此外，文章还建议对异化和代理权丧失进行持续的司法监控，并对司法教育进行投资，以增强法官有效控制和监督人工智能人工制品的能力。最后，它提出了进一步的研究议程。
{"title":"Exploring Defuturing to Design Artificial-Intelligence Artifacts: A Systemic-Design Approach to Tackle Litigiousness in the Brazilian Judiciary","authors":"L. A. C. Münch, Taís Schilling Ferraz","doi":"10.3390/laws13010004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010004","url":null,"abstract":"From the perspective of defuturing design philosophy, this article discusses the close relationship between the growing body of artificial-intelligence (AI) artifacts in the Brazilian Judiciary and the phenomenon of litigiousness therein. Litigiousness has traditionally been tackled through mechanisms that increase productivity and efficiency in case processing, a strategy that has not succeeded in reducing litigiousness, as data make evident. Analyzing data from relevant sources, this article demonstrates that AI artifacts mostly perform tasks related to clustering and mass handling of cases, following the same path dependency. Consequently, they entail risks of judges’ alienation and loss of agency, which can negatively impact citizens’ fundamental rights. Moreover, they defuture; that is, they erase other (preferable) futures. Albeit AI artifacts can play a part in tackling litigiousness, there should be a critical reflection upon futuring and defuturing. Therefore, this article recommends that SoDF—a systemic approach to design that seeks to explore design consequences, futuring and defuturing—be mandatory to any AI design process. Additionally, it proposes continuous judicial monitoring for alienation and loss of agency, as well as investments in judicial education to empower judges to effectively control and supervise AI artifacts. Finally, it suggests a further research agenda.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139437828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renewed attention to equity in higher education is welcome because true equity helps us to reason together well. When administered correctly, the jurisprudence of equity models civil discourse and, therefore, can teach us how to carry out civic engagement reasonably. Equitable interpretation of the law teaches us how to understand each other charitably. And equity’s deference to law teaches us how to reason well together about our practical problems. Law is the practical reasoning that we do together. Equity serves the ends of justice by serving law, rather than undermining it. These functions of equity in adjudication point toward a model of equity in practical reasoning and civic discourse more broadly. Research method: jurisprudence.
{"title":"Why Equity Follows the Law","authors":"Adam J. MacLeod","doi":"10.3390/laws13010003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010003","url":null,"abstract":"Renewed attention to equity in higher education is welcome because true equity helps us to reason together well. When administered correctly, the jurisprudence of equity models civil discourse and, therefore, can teach us how to carry out civic engagement reasonably. Equitable interpretation of the law teaches us how to understand each other charitably. And equity’s deference to law teaches us how to reason well together about our practical problems. Law is the practical reasoning that we do together. Equity serves the ends of justice by serving law, rather than undermining it. These functions of equity in adjudication point toward a model of equity in practical reasoning and civic discourse more broadly. Research method: jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139451105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present study aims at providing an overview of the international, European, and national legal frameworks relating to the obligation of intermediaries of financial transactions to report to tax authorities, and the professional secrecy which applies to their professions, as well as the conflict between the two. The authors address these topics from theoretical and jurisprudential perspectives, both at national and European levels, using doctrinaire, documentary, and comparative approaches. The analyses pointed out that the focus is placed on lawyer–intermediaries’ activities and liabilities when their activity is covered by confidentiality and legal privilege. Specific attention was revealed to be necessary when the conditions under which an exemption from the reporting obligation applies, and the particularities of the effects of the regulation in these scenarios. The topic of observing the legal framework and solving the possible conflicts generated by the divergent regulation of the law enforced has been the subject matter of recent European case laws that impact all the legal systems of the European Union’s member states, which has necessitated an examination of the hierarchy of law systems within the European Union member states and to emphasize the practical jurisprudential effects.
{"title":"The Professional Conflict Pertaining to Confidentiality—The Obligation of Disclosure for Intermediaries of Financial Transactions","authors":"Mihaela Tofan, Alina-Adriana Arseni","doi":"10.3390/laws13010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13010002","url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims at providing an overview of the international, European, and national legal frameworks relating to the obligation of intermediaries of financial transactions to report to tax authorities, and the professional secrecy which applies to their professions, as well as the conflict between the two. The authors address these topics from theoretical and jurisprudential perspectives, both at national and European levels, using doctrinaire, documentary, and comparative approaches. The analyses pointed out that the focus is placed on lawyer–intermediaries’ activities and liabilities when their activity is covered by confidentiality and legal privilege. Specific attention was revealed to be necessary when the conditions under which an exemption from the reporting obligation applies, and the particularities of the effects of the regulation in these scenarios. The topic of observing the legal framework and solving the possible conflicts generated by the divergent regulation of the law enforced has been the subject matter of recent European case laws that impact all the legal systems of the European Union’s member states, which has necessitated an examination of the hierarchy of law systems within the European Union member states and to emphasize the practical jurisprudential effects.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139131757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：