The donor number (DN) of electrolyte solvents was reported to be the key factor determining LiO2 intermediate solvation and lithium−oxygen battery (LOB) kinetics. In low-DN solvents, LiO2 tends to adsorb onto cathode surfaces and undergoes surface-mediated reduction to Li2O2, while in high-DN solvents, LiO2 is preferentially solvated and subsequently disproportionates to Li2O2. However, prior studies overlooked a critical issue: whether cathode surfaces can provide sufficiently strong adsorption for LiO2, particularly in low-DN solvents. Herein, this study proposes MnO2, NiO, and Co3O4 nanoarray models alongside carbon nanotubes to simultaneously investigate LiO2 adsorption on different cathodes and solvent DN effects under consistent cathode architectures. Experimental and theoretical analyses reveal that the discharge of oxygen cathodes involves a competition between the solvation of LiO2 intermediates and their adsorption on cathodes. When an oxygen cathode has strong adsorption of LiO2, the adsorption and solvation compete with each other, leading to a solution mechanism in high-DN solvents and a surface mechanism in low-DN solvents. Conversely, if an oxygen cathode shows weak adsorption of LiO2, a solution mechanism predominately occurs, regardless of whether in high- or low-DN solvents. Thus, when evaluating solvent effects on LOB kinetics, the adsorption capacity of cathode materials must be fully considered.