Environmental Science & Policy最新文献_第5页

Integrating more-than-human approaches in urban planning pedagogy: A case study from Europe 在城市规划教学中整合超越人类的方法：来自欧洲的案例研究

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321

Susa Eräranta , Adrianna Czarnecka , Monika Piotrkowska , Jonne Hytönen

Despite decades of sustainability efforts, urban planning often leads to environmental degradation. This paper questions the anthropocentric assumptions in planning education and advocates for integrating nonhuman perspectives through a more-than-human approach. To embrace the intrinsic value and agency of all actors, the paper approaches more-than-human planning education through three stages: recognition, inclusion, and co-flourishing. As traditional planning curricula prioritize human needs, overlooking the interconnectedness of all life, the paper provides already existing examples of more-than-human planning education by reflecting on the experiences of students and course staff on two Master's level studio courses at Warsaw University of Technology (Poland) and Aalto University (Finland) to learn from the potential of more-than-human education. These courses aimed to strengthen planners' roles in sustainability transformations by recognizing the agency and intrinsic value of nonhumans. The findings suggest that the core aim of planning from a more-than-human perspective is in protecting the planet’s life-supporting systems – not only in protecting individual humans, plants, or animals. This requires a shift from individually focused thinking towards more holistic systemic approaches. Based on this, the paper initiates a discussion on the need for a paradigm shift in planning education to embrace more-than-human perspectives.

尽管几十年的可持续发展努力，城市规划往往导致环境退化。本文质疑规划教育中的人类中心假设，并主张通过超越人类的方法整合非人类的观点。为了拥抱所有参与者的内在价值和能动性，本文通过三个阶段来探讨超越人类的规划教育：承认、包容和共同繁荣。由于传统的规划课程优先考虑人的需求，忽视了所有生活的相互联系，本文通过反思华沙理工大学（波兰）和阿尔托大学（芬兰）的两门硕士水平工作室课程的学生和课程人员的经验，提供了已经存在的超越人类的规划教育的例子，以了解超越人类教育的潜力。这些课程旨在通过认识非人类的能动性和内在价值，加强规划师在可持续性转型中的作用。研究结果表明，从超越人类的角度进行规划的核心目标是保护地球的生命支持系统，而不仅仅是保护个体人类、植物或动物。这需要从个人关注的思维转向更全面的系统方法。在此基础上，本文提出了规划教育范式转变的必要性，以拥抱超越人类的视角。

{"title":"Integrating more-than-human approaches in urban planning pedagogy: A case study from Europe","authors":"Susa Eräranta , Adrianna Czarnecka , Monika Piotrkowska , Jonne Hytönen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of sustainability efforts, urban planning often leads to environmental degradation. This paper questions the anthropocentric assumptions in planning education and advocates for integrating nonhuman perspectives through a more-than-human approach. To embrace the intrinsic value and agency of all actors, the paper approaches more-than-human planning education through three stages: recognition, inclusion, and co-flourishing. As traditional planning curricula prioritize human needs, overlooking the interconnectedness of all life, the paper provides already existing examples of more-than-human planning education by reflecting on the experiences of students and course staff on two Master's level studio courses at Warsaw University of Technology (Poland) and Aalto University (Finland) to learn from the potential of more-than-human education. These courses aimed to strengthen planners' roles in sustainability transformations by recognizing the agency and intrinsic value of nonhumans. The findings suggest that the core aim of planning from a more-than-human perspective is in protecting the planet’s life-supporting systems – not only in protecting individual humans, plants, or animals. This requires a shift from individually focused thinking towards more holistic systemic approaches. Based on this, the paper initiates a discussion on the need for a paradigm shift in planning education to embrace more-than-human perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104321"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Driving impacts through science-practitioner partnership: Professionalising water service delivery in rural Bangladesh 通过科学-从业者伙伴关系推动影响：使孟加拉国农村供水服务专业化

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104316

Sonia Ferdous Hoque , Rob Hope , Katrina J. Charles , Mohammad Monirul Alam , Md Nurul Osman , Mohammad Saiful Islam Mazomder

Academic research is under increasing pressure to demonstrate tangible societal, environmental, and economic impact, prompting increased engagement between scientists and practitioners. This paper investigates how such partnerships evolve, how science contributes across different phases of the policy process, and what conditions enable or constrain their effectiveness. It does so through the case of SafePani, a professional rural water service delivery model in Bangladesh. Conceptualised and piloted through UK-based research funding in schools and healthcare facilities, SafePani was later scaled under a six-year, results-based funding contract co-funded by the Government of Bangladesh. The study integrates the multi-level perspective, actor-centred institutionalism, and institutional work to analyse the micro-level activities that actors engaged in to build networks, shape dominant discourses and drive institutional change. Findings show that SafePani’s success stemmed not only from technical innovation but from its strategic adaptability. This included evolving actor configurations from academic-led research to government-led implementation, mobilising financial, intellectual, and political capital, engaging credible boundary actors to build trust, and engaging bureaucratic champions. Crucially, institutional stamina of the government, the model’s low cost and public value, and the funding flexibility enabled actors to overcome institutional inertia. SafePani offers a replicable example of how interdisciplinary science, sustained engagement, and contextual adaptation can drive institutional reform in complex policy environments.

学术研究面临越来越大的压力，需要证明切实的社会、环境和经济影响，这促使科学家和实践者之间的接触越来越多。本文研究了这种伙伴关系是如何演变的，科学如何在政策过程的不同阶段做出贡献，以及什么条件能够或限制它们的有效性。它通过SafePani的案例来做到这一点，SafePani是孟加拉国的一个专业农村供水服务提供模式。SafePani通过英国在学校和医疗机构的研究资助进行了概念化和试点，后来在孟加拉国政府共同资助的一项为期6年的基于成果的资助合同下扩大了规模。该研究整合了多层次视角、以行为者为中心的制度主义和制度工作，分析了行为者参与构建网络、塑造主导话语和推动制度变革的微观活动。研究结果表明，SafePani的成功不仅源于技术创新，还源于其战略适应性。这包括将参与者配置从学术主导的研究转变为政府主导的实施，调动金融、智力和政治资本，吸引可信的边界参与者建立信任，以及吸引官僚主义拥护者。至关重要的是，政府的制度耐力、该模式的低成本和公共价值以及资金灵活性使参与者能够克服制度惯性。SafePani提供了一个可复制的例子，说明跨学科科学、持续参与和情境适应如何在复杂的政策环境中推动制度改革。

{"title":"Driving impacts through science-practitioner partnership: Professionalising water service delivery in rural Bangladesh","authors":"Sonia Ferdous Hoque , Rob Hope , Katrina J. Charles , Mohammad Monirul Alam , Md Nurul Osman , Mohammad Saiful Islam Mazomder","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104316","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104316","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic research is under increasing pressure to demonstrate tangible societal, environmental, and economic impact, prompting increased engagement between scientists and practitioners. This paper investigates how such partnerships evolve, how science contributes across different phases of the policy process, and what conditions enable or constrain their effectiveness. It does so through the case of SafePani, a professional rural water service delivery model in Bangladesh. Conceptualised and piloted through UK-based research funding in schools and healthcare facilities, SafePani was later scaled under a six-year, results-based funding contract co-funded by the Government of Bangladesh. The study integrates the multi-level perspective, actor-centred institutionalism, and institutional work to analyse the micro-level activities that actors engaged in to build networks, shape dominant discourses and drive institutional change. Findings show that SafePani’s success stemmed not only from technical innovation but from its strategic adaptability. This included evolving actor configurations from academic-led research to government-led implementation, mobilising financial, intellectual, and political capital, engaging credible boundary actors to build trust, and engaging bureaucratic champions. Crucially, institutional stamina of the government, the model’s low cost and public value, and the funding flexibility enabled actors to overcome institutional inertia. SafePani offers a replicable example of how interdisciplinary science, sustained engagement, and contextual adaptation can drive institutional reform in complex policy environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104316"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145974366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Conceptualizing transdisciplinarity: How do visuals mean? 概念化跨学科：视觉是什么意思？

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253

Merlijn van Hulst , Kirsty Holstead , Tamara Metze

Transdisciplinary research is commonly understood as a research collaboration between different academic disciplines and actors from different sectors of society to co-produce knowledge needed in addressing real-world problems. In this paper, we understand transdisciplinary research as an epistemological object and study how researchers conceptualize it through visualization. To do this, we analyzed a set of related visuals in their textual context published over the last 20 years. This multi-modal analysis shows that transdisciplinarity in our set has, throughout the years, consisted of three main categories: science, practice, and the transdisciplinary research process. Transdisciplinary research has been visualized as a stable double-joint cyclical narrative starting in the settings of science and practice, after which actors join to collaborate, both depart with the results of collaboration. An assumed principle is continuously and implicitly visualized: the idea and ideal that science and practice are contributing, collaborating, and reaping benefits on the basis of equality. Supported by the literature, we problematize this way visuals obscure imbalances in practice. Finally, we discuss how visuals mean and what other ways of conceptualizing an epistemic object like transdisciplinary are possible.

跨学科研究通常被理解为不同学科和社会不同部门的参与者之间的研究合作，共同产生解决现实问题所需的知识。在本文中，我们将跨学科研究理解为一个认识论对象，并研究研究者如何通过可视化将其概念化。为了做到这一点，我们分析了过去20年来出版的一组相关的视觉文本。这种多模态分析表明，多年来，我们集合中的跨学科性由三个主要类别组成：科学、实践和跨学科研究过程。跨学科研究被视为一种稳定的双联合循环叙事，始于科学和实践的背景，之后参与者加入合作，双方都带着合作的结果离开。一个假定的原则是不断地和含蓄地可视化：科学和实践在平等的基础上贡献、合作和收获利益的想法和理想。在文献的支持下，我们认为这种视觉效果掩盖了实践中的不平衡。最后，我们讨论了视觉的含义以及其他可能的概念化认知对象（如跨学科）的方法。

{"title":"Conceptualizing transdisciplinarity: How do visuals mean?","authors":"Merlijn van Hulst , Kirsty Holstead , Tamara Metze","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104253","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinary research is commonly understood as a research collaboration between different academic disciplines and actors from different sectors of society to co-produce knowledge needed in addressing real-world problems. In this paper, we understand transdisciplinary research as <em>an epistemological object</em> and study how researchers conceptualize it through visualization. To do this, we analyzed a set of related visuals in their textual context published over the last 20 years. This multi-modal analysis shows that transdisciplinarity in our set has, throughout the years, consisted of three main categories: science, practice, and the transdisciplinary research process. Transdisciplinary research has been visualized as a stable double-joint cyclical narrative starting in the settings of science and practice, after which actors join to collaborate, both depart with the results of collaboration. An assumed principle is continuously and implicitly visualized: the idea and ideal that science and practice are contributing, collaborating, and reaping benefits on the basis of equality. Supported by the literature, we problematize this way visuals obscure imbalances in practice. Finally, we discuss how visuals mean and what other ways of conceptualizing an epistemic object like transdisciplinary are possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104253"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147421217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reimagining alternative socioecological futures: Transformative narratives for a Second Scientific Revolution 重新想象可选择的社会生态未来：第二次科学革命的变革叙事

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319

Eduardo Rodríguez Batista

The Anthropocene has become a dominant framework for describing the current human-driven geological epoch. However, this concept is often rooted in dualistic worldviews that separate humans from nature. This article examines the colonial, capitalist, and mechanistic discourses that have sustained these divisions, linking them to the origins and persistence of the socioecological crisis. It advocates for a shift toward decolonial and non-anthropocentric perspectives that reimagine human–nature relationships. Central to this reorientation is the power of transformative narratives to challenge dominant scientific myths and promote interspecies mutualism and interconnectedness. Drawing on insights from disciplines such as evolutionary biology, political ecology and ecofeminism, among others, this work underscores the importance of these narratives in shaping collective action and imagining alternative socioecological futures. It ultimately calls for a Second Scientific Revolution, a cultural and scientific paradigm transformation towards more inclusive, empathetic, and sustainable ways of inhabiting the Earth.

人类世已经成为描述当前人类驱动的地质时代的主要框架。然而，这种观念往往植根于将人类与自然分开的二元论世界观。本文考察了维持这些分裂的殖民主义、资本主义和机械论话语，并将它们与社会生态危机的起源和持续联系起来。它提倡向非殖民主义和非人类中心主义的观点转变，重新设想人与自然的关系。这种重新定位的核心是变革性叙事的力量，它挑战了占主导地位的科学神话，促进了物种间的互惠互利和相互联系。借鉴进化生物学、政治生态学和生态女性主义等学科的见解，这项工作强调了这些叙事在塑造集体行动和想象替代社会生态未来方面的重要性。它最终呼吁进行第二次科学革命，这是一场文化和科学范式的转变，朝着更包容、更有同情心和更可持续的方式居住在地球上。

{"title":"Reimagining alternative socioecological futures: Transformative narratives for a Second Scientific Revolution","authors":"Eduardo Rodríguez Batista","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Anthropocene has become a dominant framework for describing the current human-driven geological epoch. However, this concept is often rooted in dualistic worldviews that separate humans from nature. This article examines the colonial, capitalist, and mechanistic discourses that have sustained these divisions, linking them to the origins and persistence of the socioecological crisis. It advocates for a shift toward decolonial and non-anthropocentric perspectives that reimagine human–nature relationships. Central to this reorientation is the power of transformative narratives to challenge dominant scientific myths and promote interspecies mutualism and interconnectedness. Drawing on insights from disciplines such as evolutionary biology, political ecology and ecofeminism, among others, this work underscores the importance of these narratives in shaping collective action and imagining alternative socioecological futures. It ultimately calls for a Second Scientific Revolution, a cultural and scientific paradigm transformation towards more inclusive, empathetic, and sustainable ways of inhabiting the Earth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104319"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Governing the trade-off between the co-production of actionable knowledge and academic publishing in transdisciplinary sustainability research 管理跨学科可持续性研究中可操作知识的共同生产与学术出版之间的权衡

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318

Tom Dedeurwaerdere , Stephanie Jahn , Jens Newig

Despite their stated ambitions, the societal outputs of many transdisciplinary sustainability research projects remain at the level of research dissemination to policy makers and concerned stakeholders, rather than organizing a truly interactive knowledge co-production process. In addition, projects that organize interactive knowledge co-production often achieve either a high level of actionable knowledge outputs for the key societal stakeholders or a high level of publication outputs for the scientific community. This paper analyses this trade-off in more detail based on the survey results from a unique sample of 50 completed EU research projects that fall under the same funding requirement to combine societal impact and scientific excellence in so-called "Research and Innovation Actions". The results confirm the difficulty for many projects to achieve both goals. In fact, the results show that only about half (54 %) of the projects produced actionable knowledge outputs at the end of the project, and only 34 % achieved both a high level of actionable knowledge outputs and a high level of peer-reviewed articles. The analysis of the survey results shows that co-design of research tasks related to field work, such as social science data collection or technical experimentation in real-world environments, contributes to actionable knowledge, but also potentially leads to fewer publications. An important exception to this finding is the case of intermediate levels of field research co-design. In this case, the strengthening of relational and reflective-normative trust between scientific researchers and social actors contributes to both actionable knowledge outputs and academic publications.

尽管有明确的目标，但许多跨学科可持续发展研究项目的社会产出仍然停留在向决策者和有关利益相关者传播研究成果的水平，而不是组织一个真正互动的知识共同生产过程。此外，组织互动式知识合作生产的项目通常要么为关键的社会利益相关者实现高水平的可操作知识产出，要么为科学界实现高水平的出版物产出。本文基于对50个已完成的欧盟研究项目的独特样本的调查结果，更详细地分析了这种权衡，这些研究项目属于相同的资助要求，以将所谓的“研究与创新行动”中的社会影响和科学卓越结合起来。结果证实了许多项目实现这两个目标的难度。事实上，结果表明，只有大约一半（54 %）的项目在项目结束时产生了可操作的知识输出，只有34 %的项目既获得了高水平的可操作知识输出，又获得了高水平的同行评审文章。对调查结果的分析表明，与实地工作相关的研究任务的共同设计，如社会科学数据收集或现实环境中的技术实验，有助于获得可操作的知识，但也可能导致出版物减少。这一发现的一个重要例外是中间水平的实地研究协同设计的情况。在这种情况下，加强科学研究人员和社会行为者之间的关系和反思规范信任有助于可操作的知识产出和学术出版物。

{"title":"Governing the trade-off between the co-production of actionable knowledge and academic publishing in transdisciplinary sustainability research","authors":"Tom Dedeurwaerdere , Stephanie Jahn , Jens Newig","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite their stated ambitions, the societal outputs of many transdisciplinary sustainability research projects remain at the level of research dissemination to policy makers and concerned stakeholders, rather than organizing a truly interactive knowledge co-production process. In addition, projects that organize interactive knowledge co-production often achieve either a high level of actionable knowledge outputs for the key societal stakeholders or a high level of publication outputs for the scientific community. This paper analyses this trade-off in more detail based on the survey results from a unique sample of 50 completed EU research projects that fall under the same funding requirement to combine societal impact and scientific excellence in so-called \"Research and Innovation Actions\". The results confirm the difficulty for many projects to achieve both goals. In fact, the results show that only about half (54 %) of the projects produced actionable knowledge outputs at the end of the project, and only 34 % achieved both a high level of actionable knowledge outputs and a high level of peer-reviewed articles. The analysis of the survey results shows that co-design of research tasks related to field work, such as social science data collection or technical experimentation in real-world environments, contributes to actionable knowledge, but also potentially leads to fewer publications. An important exception to this finding is the case of intermediate levels of field research co-design. In this case, the strengthening of relational and reflective-normative trust between scientific researchers and social actors contributes to both actionable knowledge outputs and academic publications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104318"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Is there water sector transformation evident in policies? Experiences from Asia and Africa 水务部门的政策转型是否明显？来自亚洲和非洲的经验

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104307

Mijo Luke , Risper Ajwang’ Ondiek , Fides Izdori , Gitima Das , Sumit Vij

With climate change and political uncertainties, policies worldwide have undergone several reforms, promising transformation for improving water access and usage. However, unsustainable and unequal outcomes persist in several countries. The article investigates the gap between the rhetoric and reality of transformation within the existing water-related policies in two South Asian and two East African countries. We unravel the key elements of transformation within the water sector by employing an analytical framework of policy characteristics, scalability, power-sensitive-inclusivity, reflexivity, institutional flexibility, and temporality (SPIRIT). Our study analysed the presence of these characteristics in the existing water-related policies in four countries: Bangladesh, India, Kenya, and Tanzania. A total of 65 policy documents were analysed from India (n = 26), Bangladesh (n = 19), Kenya (n = 12), and Tanzania (n = 8). Our findings show that the policies from India and Bangladesh follow a techno-managerial approach to transformation and have short-term vision with a national focus. The policies have limited focus on power sensitivity and do not include marginalised actors such as fisherfolk and small boat traders. The East African policies advocate change at multiple scales (local, and transnational), value the participation of marginalised groups in the policy-making process, and encourage collaboration across various sectors and stakeholders to address emerging issues, but lack temporality. We conclude that water sector policies in these countries are not transformative despite years of reform and promises made. Therefore, there is a need for politicisation and pluralisation of the transformation process to design pathways.

由于气候变化和政治不确定性，世界各地的政策经历了几次改革，有望改善水的获取和使用。然而，一些国家仍然存在不可持续和不平等的结果。本文调查了两个南亚和两个东非国家现有的与水有关的政策的修辞和现实之间的差距。通过采用政策特征、可扩展性、权力敏感性-包容性、反身性、制度灵活性和时间性（SPIRIT）的分析框架，我们揭示了水务部门转型的关键要素。我们的研究分析了孟加拉国、印度、肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚四个国家现有的水相关政策中存在的这些特征。共分析了来自印度（n = 26）、孟加拉国（n = 19）、肯尼亚（n = 12）和坦桑尼亚（n = 8）的65份政策文件。我们的研究结果表明，印度和孟加拉国的政策遵循技术管理方法进行转型，具有以国家为重点的短期愿景。这些政策对权力敏感性的关注有限，也不包括渔民和小船商人等被边缘化的行为者。东非政策倡导在多个层面（本地和跨国）进行变革，重视边缘化群体在决策过程中的参与，并鼓励各部门和利益相关者之间的合作，以解决新出现的问题，但缺乏时间性。我们得出的结论是，尽管这些国家进行了多年的改革并做出了承诺，但水部门的政策并没有带来变革。因此，有必要将转型过程政治化和多元化来设计路径。

{"title":"Is there water sector transformation evident in policies? Experiences from Asia and Africa","authors":"Mijo Luke , Risper Ajwang’ Ondiek , Fides Izdori , Gitima Das , Sumit Vij","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104307","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104307","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With climate change and political uncertainties, policies worldwide have undergone several reforms, promising transformation for improving water access and usage. However, unsustainable and unequal outcomes persist in several countries. The article investigates the gap between the rhetoric and reality of transformation within the existing water-related policies in two South Asian and two East African countries. We unravel the key elements of transformation within the water sector by employing an analytical framework of policy characteristics, <em>scalability, power-sensitive-inclusivity, reflexivity, institutional flexibility, and temporality</em> (SPIRIT). Our study analysed the presence of these characteristics in the existing water-related policies in four countries: Bangladesh, India, Kenya, and Tanzania. A total of 65 policy documents were analysed from India (n = 26), Bangladesh (n = 19), Kenya (n = 12), and Tanzania (n = 8). Our findings show that the policies from India and Bangladesh follow a techno-managerial approach to transformation and have short-term vision with a national focus. The policies have limited focus on power sensitivity and do not include marginalised actors such as fisherfolk and small boat traders. The East African policies advocate change at multiple scales (local, and transnational), value the participation of marginalised groups in the policy-making process, and encourage collaboration across various sectors and stakeholders to address emerging issues, but lack temporality. We conclude that water sector policies in these countries are not transformative despite years of reform and promises made. Therefore, there is a need for politicisation and pluralisation of the transformation process to design pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104307"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145974362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Values, rules, and knowledge: Understanding and enabling land use change decisions as adaptation to climate change 价值观、规则和知识：理解并使土地利用变化决策适应气候变化

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104309

Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry , Nicholas Kirk , Paula Blackett , Justin Connolly

Changing productive land use can be a transformational adaptation strategy to reduce climate risk and enable new opportunities for farmers and growers. Such decisions, however, are complicated by uncertainty, long lead times, and substantial capital investment. These individual and collective choices are shaped by interactions between values, rules, and knowledge (VRK), which together define the decision-making contexts that enable or constrain land-use transformation. We apply the VRK framework in case studies of two agricultural regions in Aotearoa New Zealand using participatory workshops and systems-thinking tools, including timelines and causal loop diagramming. The analysis reveals that land-use decisions are strongly shaped by values (such as place attachment and occupational identity) and knowledge, which is often oriented toward optimising existing production systems rather than exploring alternatives. In contrast, governance and policy rules play a more indirect role, primarily by reinforcing or constraining experimentation. By making visible feedbacks, path dependencies, and leverage points within decision contexts, the study shows how systems approaches can support more effective alignment between regulatory settings, incentives, and farmers’ values and aspirations, thereby enabling climate-resilient land-use transitions.

改变生产性土地利用可以成为一种变革性适应战略，以减少气候风险，并为农民和种植者创造新的机会。然而，由于不确定性、漫长的交货时间和大量的资本投资，这些决定变得复杂。这些个人和集体的选择是由价值观、规则和知识（VRK）之间的相互作用形成的，它们共同定义了实现或限制土地利用转型的决策环境。我们利用参与式研讨会和系统思维工具，包括时间轴和因果循环图，将VRK框架应用于新西兰奥特罗阿两个农业区的案例研究。分析表明，土地利用决策在很大程度上受到价值观（如地方依恋和职业认同）和知识的影响，这往往是为了优化现有的生产系统，而不是探索替代方案。相比之下，治理和政策规则发挥更间接的作用，主要是通过加强或限制实验。通过在决策背景下建立可见的反馈、路径依赖关系和杠杆点，该研究展示了系统方法如何支持更有效地协调监管设置、激励措施和农民的价值观和愿望，从而实现气候适应型土地利用转型。

{"title":"Values, rules, and knowledge: Understanding and enabling land use change decisions as adaptation to climate change","authors":"Nicholas A. Cradock-Henry , Nicholas Kirk , Paula Blackett , Justin Connolly","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104309","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104309","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changing productive land use can be a transformational adaptation strategy to reduce climate risk and enable new opportunities for farmers and growers. Such decisions, however, are complicated by uncertainty, long lead times, and substantial capital investment. These individual and collective choices are shaped by interactions between values, rules, and knowledge (VRK), which together define the decision-making contexts that enable or constrain land-use transformation. We apply the VRK framework in case studies of two agricultural regions in Aotearoa New Zealand using participatory workshops and systems-thinking tools, including timelines and causal loop diagramming. The analysis reveals that land-use decisions are strongly shaped by values (such as place attachment and occupational identity) and knowledge, which is often oriented toward optimising existing production systems rather than exploring alternatives. In contrast, governance and policy rules play a more indirect role, primarily by reinforcing or constraining experimentation. By making visible feedbacks, path dependencies, and leverage points within decision contexts, the study shows how systems approaches can support more effective alignment between regulatory settings, incentives, and farmers’ values and aspirations, thereby enabling climate-resilient land-use transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145974363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

National circumstances matter: How climate change vulnerability and political instability affect greenhouse gas coverage in nationally determined contributions 国情至关重要：气候变化脆弱性和政治不稳定如何影响国家自主贡献中温室气体的覆盖范围

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104283

Jaeeun Koo , Sangchan Park , Yunsung Lee

Almost 200 countries have submitted their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in response to the 2015 Paris Agreement’s call for net-zero targets. However, critics posit that these collective efforts may fall short of limiting global temperature rise, in part because these countries differ significantly in the scope of greenhouse gases (GHGs) included in their national climate targets. This study investigates why some countries set a narrower set of GHGs in their NDCs than others. Drawing on data from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) NDC registry and Climate Watch, we quantify GHG coverage by weighting each gas according to its 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP-100), thereby capturing relative climate impacts and ensuring alignment with national inventory practices. We then estimate ordinary least squares, ordered logit, and negative binomial regressions to examine the influence of two national-level factors, climate change vulnerability and political instability, on GHG coverage. The results show that both these factors are negatively associated with the scope of GHGs covered in NDCs. These findings underscore that expanding GHG coverage in NDCs requires not only technical capacity building but also institutional conditions that reduce climate change vulnerability and enhance political stability, thereby enabling countries to commit to more comprehensive mitigation goals.

近200个国家提交了国家自主贡献（NDCs），以响应2015年《巴黎协定》对净零目标的呼吁。然而，批评人士认为，这些集体努力可能无法限制全球气温上升，部分原因是这些国家在其国家气候目标中包含的温室气体（GHGs）范围上存在显著差异。本研究调查了为什么一些国家在国家自主贡献中设定的温室气体排放量比其他国家要小。根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》（UNFCCC）国家数据中心注册表和气候观察的数据，我们根据100年全球变暖潜能值（GWP-100）对每种气体进行加权，从而量化温室气体覆盖率，从而捕捉相对气候影响并确保与国家清单实践保持一致。然后，我们估计了普通最小二乘、有序logit和负二项回归，以检验气候变化脆弱性和政治不稳定这两个国家级因素对温室气体覆盖率的影响。结果表明，这两个因子与国家自主贡献覆盖的温室气体范围呈负相关。这些研究结果强调，扩大国家自主贡献的温室气体覆盖范围不仅需要技术能力建设，还需要减少气候变化脆弱性和加强政治稳定的体制条件，从而使各国能够承诺实现更全面的减缓目标。

{"title":"National circumstances matter: How climate change vulnerability and political instability affect greenhouse gas coverage in nationally determined contributions","authors":"Jaeeun Koo , Sangchan Park , Yunsung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104283","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104283","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Almost 200 countries have submitted their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in response to the 2015 Paris Agreement’s call for net-zero targets. However, critics posit that these collective efforts may fall short of limiting global temperature rise, in part because these countries differ significantly in the scope of greenhouse gases (GHGs) included in their national climate targets. This study investigates why some countries set a narrower set of GHGs in their NDCs than others. Drawing on data from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) NDC registry and Climate Watch, we quantify GHG coverage by weighting each gas according to its 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP-100), thereby capturing relative climate impacts and ensuring alignment with national inventory practices. We then estimate ordinary least squares, ordered logit, and negative binomial regressions to examine the influence of two national-level factors, climate change vulnerability and political instability, on GHG coverage. The results show that both these factors are negatively associated with the scope of GHGs covered in NDCs. These findings underscore that expanding GHG coverage in NDCs requires not only technical capacity building but also institutional conditions that reduce climate change vulnerability and enhance political stability, thereby enabling countries to commit to more comprehensive mitigation goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104283"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145622811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A diagnostic framework for integrated flood risk governance: Conceptual foundations and insights from Lagos and Accra 综合洪水风险治理诊断框架：来自拉各斯和阿克拉的概念基础和见解

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104304

Olasunkanmi Habeeb Okunola , Daniel Adeoluwa Adeniyi , Himanshu Shekhar , Saskia E. Werners

Amid escalating urban flood risks driven by climate change and poorly managed urban growth, there is growing recognition of the need to strengthen and integrate flood risk governance systems. However, existing governance arrangements in many cities remain fragmented, siloed, and inadequately inclusive. This paper addresses a critical gap in the literature by proposing and applying an Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework that systematically assesses governance integration through three interrelated dimensions: institutional interaction, actor relationships, and policy mixes. Drawing on policy document analysis and in-depth interviews, the study explores the applicability of the Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework in two high-risk urban settings: Lagos, Nigeria, and Accra, Ghana. The findings reveal that although integration is emphasized in formal policies, practical implementation is hampered by highly centralized governance structures, limited stakeholder participation, and weak coordination mechanisms. In both cities, the private sector remains marginally involved, and policy coherence is often undermined by poor enforcement and funding constraints. This study demonstrates the utility of the Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework in diagnosing governance fragmentation and highlights the need for more inclusive, adaptive, and participatory approaches to flood risk governance.

由于气候变化和管理不善的城市增长导致城市洪水风险不断升级，人们越来越认识到加强和整合洪水风险治理系统的必要性。然而，许多城市现有的治理安排仍然是分散的、孤立的、包容性不足的。本文提出并应用了一个综合洪水风险治理框架，该框架通过三个相互关联的维度系统地评估治理整合：制度互动、行动者关系和政策组合，从而弥补了文献中的一个关键空白。通过政策文件分析和深度访谈，本研究探讨了综合洪水风险治理框架在两个高风险城市环境中的适用性：尼日利亚拉各斯和加纳阿克拉。研究结果表明，尽管正式政策强调整合，但实际实施受到高度集中的治理结构、有限的利益相关者参与和薄弱的协调机制的阻碍。在这两个城市，私营部门仍然很少参与，政策一致性往往受到执法不力和资金限制的影响。本研究展示了综合洪水风险治理框架在诊断治理碎片化方面的效用，并强调需要采取更具包容性、适应性和参与性的洪水风险治理方法。

{"title":"A diagnostic framework for integrated flood risk governance: Conceptual foundations and insights from Lagos and Accra","authors":"Olasunkanmi Habeeb Okunola , Daniel Adeoluwa Adeniyi , Himanshu Shekhar , Saskia E. Werners","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104304","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104304","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid escalating urban flood risks driven by climate change and poorly managed urban growth, there is growing recognition of the need to strengthen and integrate flood risk governance systems. However, existing governance arrangements in many cities remain fragmented, siloed, and inadequately inclusive. This paper addresses a critical gap in the literature by proposing and applying an Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework that systematically assesses governance integration through three interrelated dimensions: institutional interaction, actor relationships, and policy mixes. Drawing on policy document analysis and in-depth interviews, the study explores the applicability of the Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework in two high-risk urban settings: Lagos, Nigeria, and Accra, Ghana. The findings reveal that although integration is emphasized in formal policies, practical implementation is hampered by highly centralized governance structures, limited stakeholder participation, and weak coordination mechanisms. In both cities, the private sector remains marginally involved, and policy coherence is often undermined by poor enforcement and funding constraints. This study demonstrates the utility of the Integrated Flood Risk Governance framework in diagnosing governance fragmentation and highlights the need for more inclusive, adaptive, and participatory approaches to flood risk governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104304"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Visualizing nature: A review of photovoice as a method for understanding environmental change 可视化自然：光声作为一种理解环境变化的方法综述

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104298

Sofie Mortensen , Francois Questiaux , Jasmine Vorburger , Shae Barber , Hilary Oliva Faxon

Originally developed in the field of public health, the participatory photography research methodology known as “photovoice” has increasingly been used by interdisciplinary environmental scientists. This scoping review assesses this trend, identifying and analyzing 132 relevant journal articles to evaluate how researchers deploy this methodology to understand environmental change processes and perceptions. We find that photovoice has been applied to a range of environmental topics, including environmental health, climate change, water governance, and rural and urban development, complementing a turn towards community-based research methods and co-production of knowledge within the field. We interrogate who is included in photovoice projects and how they were conducted, showing how the original intent of the method - to highlight the perceptions, voices, and experiences of rural women - has been broadened to capture lived experiences of marginalized groups such as resource-dependent, low-income and Indigenous communities. We highlight what we see as the core contribution of this method - understanding alternative epistemologies of environmental change – and argue that photovoice has high potential to capture, explore, and share the views and voices of marginalized people. While we caution that studies should consciously consider the trade-offs involved in this time-consuming and open-ended method, we argue that increasing use of this method can contribute to our understanding of a range of empirical topics as well as fostering epistemological pluralism and insights that can lead to action.

最初在公共卫生领域开发的参与式摄影研究方法被称为“photovoice”，已越来越多地被跨学科环境科学家使用。这篇范围综述评估了这一趋势，识别和分析了132篇相关的期刊文章，以评估研究人员如何利用这种方法来理解环境变化过程和感知。我们发现，光声已应用于一系列环境主题，包括环境健康、气候变化、水治理以及农村和城市发展，补充了转向以社区为基础的研究方法和该领域内知识的共同生产。我们询问了哪些人参与了“照片之声”项目，以及它们是如何进行的，并展示了该方法的初衷——强调农村妇女的看法、声音和经历——如何被扩大到捕捉诸如资源依赖型、低收入和土著社区等边缘化群体的生活经历。我们强调了这种方法的核心贡献——理解环境变化的替代认识论——并认为光声在捕捉、探索和分享边缘化人群的观点和声音方面具有很高的潜力。虽然我们警告说，研究应该有意识地考虑这种耗时且开放式方法所涉及的权衡，但我们认为，越来越多地使用这种方法可以有助于我们对一系列经验主题的理解，并促进认识论多元化和可能导致行动的见解。

{"title":"Visualizing nature: A review of photovoice as a method for understanding environmental change","authors":"Sofie Mortensen , Francois Questiaux , Jasmine Vorburger , Shae Barber , Hilary Oliva Faxon","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104298","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104298","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Originally developed in the field of public health, the participatory photography research methodology known as “photovoice” has increasingly been used by interdisciplinary environmental scientists. This scoping review assesses this trend, identifying and analyzing 132 relevant journal articles to evaluate how researchers deploy this methodology to understand environmental change processes and perceptions. We find that photovoice has been applied to a range of environmental topics, including environmental health, climate change, water governance, and rural and urban development, complementing a turn towards community-based research methods and co-production of knowledge within the field. We interrogate who is included in photovoice projects and how they were conducted, showing how the original intent of the method - to highlight the perceptions, voices, and experiences of rural women - has been broadened to capture lived experiences of marginalized groups such as resource-dependent, low-income and Indigenous communities. We highlight what we see as the core contribution of this method - understanding alternative epistemologies of environmental change – and argue that photovoice has high potential to capture, explore, and share the views and voices of marginalized people. While we caution that studies should consciously consider the trade-offs involved in this time-consuming and open-ended method, we argue that increasing use of this method can contribute to our understanding of a range of empirical topics as well as fostering epistemological pluralism and insights that can lead to action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104298"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145734516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0