Pub Date : 2021-06-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-4
N. Murzin
Against all numerous complexities and riddles that Dostoevsky’s “The Devils” contain, a great storm of searing passions, insane ideas and wild behavior its characters reprise, the figure of Storyteller often seems lost, pale, quite insignificant. He is merely a mask of the Author, a weaver of narration, a devoted chronicler of what happened. Or is he really? We somehow rarely realize that it’s his eyes we look through and see what is considered to be the “final truth” of the novel, the meaning and motivation behind its heroes’ actions, let alone the deepest secrets of their minds and souls. How come a character all like themselves has all the keys, where’s the source of his all-knowing, and is it only a matter of pure art, a writer’s convention that we must easily accept and pay so much attention? Maybe ignoring this strangeness means we really underestimate the troubling greatness of “The Devils”, its many layers and ruinous conflict that lies at the core of all its confusion.
{"title":"Who tells the story in “The Devils”?","authors":"N. Murzin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-4","url":null,"abstract":"Against all numerous complexities and riddles that Dostoevsky’s “The Devils” contain, a great storm of searing passions, insane ideas and wild behavior its characters reprise, the figure of Storyteller often seems lost, pale, quite insignificant. He is merely a mask of the Author, a weaver of narration, a devoted chronicler of what happened. Or is he really? We somehow rarely realize that it’s his eyes we look through and see what is considered to be the “final truth” of the novel, the meaning and motivation behind its heroes’ actions, let alone the deepest secrets of their minds and souls. How come a character all like themselves has all the keys, where’s the source of his all-knowing, and is it only a matter of pure art, a writer’s convention that we must easily accept and pay so much attention? Maybe ignoring this strangeness means we really underestimate the troubling greatness of “The Devils”, its many layers and ruinous conflict that lies at the core of all its confusion.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134349278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-8
S. Stasenko
The article is written on the basis of the first part of the thesis, devoted to the substantiation, interpretation and re-actualization of spiritual alchemy. Recognizing the great difficulty in reading alchemical texts, it is proposed to consider 3 authors (E. Husserl, M. Eliade and C. G. Jung), with the help of which a separate method is formed to achieve the necessary setting when reading certain treatises of this direction. The methodological principle necessary for its acquisition emerges.
{"title":"What is needed to understand alchemical texts","authors":"S. Stasenko","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2021-33-8","url":null,"abstract":"The article is written on the basis of the first part of the thesis, devoted to the substantiation, interpretation and re-actualization of spiritual alchemy. Recognizing the great difficulty in reading alchemical texts, it is proposed to consider 3 authors (E. Husserl, M. Eliade and C. G. Jung), with the help of which a separate method is formed to achieve the necessary setting when reading certain treatises of this direction. The methodological principle necessary for its acquisition emerges.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130813478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3
A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
In this paper, causes of the complexity of Hegel's philosophical language is being investigated. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that they are not as much individually psychological, as objective, and are associated with the knowledge structure per se, which is obtained in the framework of various scientific disciplines. This knowledge altogether forms a “circle”, and therefore it is not possible to discover its fundamental basis from which knowledge should be derived. This imposes a number of significant restrictions on the operations that can be performed with the concepts of logic. These operations make full use of other research programs, precisely because they avoid the global challenge given by Hegel. Consequently, the ambitiousness of the task, the high stakes associated with it, accompanying its implementation, doom Hegel to use such a philosophical language, which is considered to be “extremely difficult”, “rigid”, “entangled”.
{"title":"Representation failure\u0000or How to survive in the realm of shadows\u0000(quest for the keys to Hegel’s “Science of Logic” — key No. 2)","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-3","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, causes of the complexity of Hegel's philosophical language is being investigated. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that they are not as much individually psychological, as objective, and are associated with the knowledge structure per se, which is obtained in the framework of various scientific disciplines. This knowledge altogether forms a “circle”, and therefore it is not possible to discover its fundamental basis from which knowledge should be derived. This imposes a number of significant restrictions on the operations that can be performed with the concepts of logic. These operations make full use of other research programs, precisely because they avoid the global challenge given by Hegel. Consequently, the ambitiousness of the task, the high stakes associated with it, accompanying its implementation, doom Hegel to use such a philosophical language, which is considered to be “extremely difficult”, “rigid”, “entangled”.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123709854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-6
A. Syrodeeva
Social criticism is one of the factors that supports transformations in contemporary dynamic world. Its accessible publicity raises for various social agents the question of the constructiveness of their critical efforts. The article discusses how important it is for the effectiveness of criticism not only its meaning, but also the style of expression, based on the degree of willingness to see in those who stand on the opposing side of the social discussion barrier also human beings as the critic himself/herself is. Referring to two works by Timur Kibirov: the poem Through Farewell Tears and the novel The General and His Family, the author examines some aspects of social criticism that define its tone, intonation, including attention to sociocultural details, consideration of the ambivalence of a particular social phenomenon, as well as the doubts of the social subject concerning his/her own critical views.
{"title":"Casual Style of Criticism","authors":"A. Syrodeeva","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-6","url":null,"abstract":"Social criticism is one of the factors that supports transformations in contemporary dynamic world. Its accessible publicity raises for various social agents the question of the constructiveness of their critical efforts. The article discusses how important it is for the effectiveness of criticism not only its meaning, but also the style of expression, based on the degree of willingness to see in those who stand on the opposing side of the social discussion barrier also human beings as the critic himself/herself is. Referring to two works by Timur Kibirov: the poem Through Farewell Tears and the novel The General and His Family, the author examines some aspects of social criticism that define its tone, intonation, including attention to sociocultural details, consideration of the ambivalence of a particular social phenomenon, as well as the doubts of the social subject concerning his/her own critical views.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127018946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-7
Konstantin О. Vasilyev
The author of the essay, a linguist, argues that a certain part of the so-called wise sayings and quotes are mere platitudes. Some of them are believed to be indisputable truths but they make no sense; among false assertions are the well-known statements “There is no rule without exceptions” and “The exception proves/confirms the rule”. One of the famous quotations, namely Gandhi’s statement that “Bad handwriting is a sign of an imperfect education” is dealt with separately and extensively. The author thinks that schoolteachers’ efforts are to little avail if the student has no talent for calligraphy and spelling (as well as for other subjects). The priority of sense is contended with regard to all statements including philosophical ones. The authors draws on Gandhi’s “Autobiography” and Oscar Wilde’s “The Decay of Lying” and their Russian translations to show that foreign texts reach the Russian reader with the meaning/message of the original more or less distorted. The Russian translation of Ludwig Feuerbach’s exposition of Spinoza’s philosophical views is subjected to criticism.
{"title":"Handwriting, Spelling, Sense","authors":"Konstantin О. Vasilyev","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-7","url":null,"abstract":"The author of the essay, a linguist, argues that a certain part of the so-called wise sayings and quotes are mere platitudes. Some of them are believed to be indisputable truths but they make no sense; among false assertions are the well-known statements “There is no rule without exceptions” and “The exception proves/confirms the rule”. One of the famous quotations, namely Gandhi’s statement that “Bad handwriting is a sign of an imperfect education” is dealt with separately and extensively. The author thinks that schoolteachers’ efforts are to little avail if the student has no talent for calligraphy and spelling (as well as for other subjects). The priority of sense is contended with regard to all statements including philosophical ones. The authors draws on Gandhi’s “Autobiography” and Oscar Wilde’s “The Decay of Lying” and their Russian translations to show that foreign texts reach the Russian reader with the meaning/message of the original more or less distorted. The Russian translation of Ludwig Feuerbach’s exposition of Spinoza’s philosophical views is subjected to criticism.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123702522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-8
V. N. Olenich
This article deals with the analyse of “Proslogion” of Anselm of Canterbury and examines the apophatic aspects of “unum argumentum”. In the conclusion it shows a number of specific apories that characterize Anselm’s thought. It makes a suggestion about the role of the “fool” from 14th Psalm in the elaboration of this argument.
{"title":"Anselm’s apories","authors":"V. N. Olenich","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-8","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the analyse of “Proslogion” of Anselm of Canterbury and examines the apophatic aspects of “unum argumentum”. In the conclusion it shows a number of specific apories that characterize Anselm’s thought. It makes a suggestion about the role of the “fool” from 14th Psalm in the elaboration of this argument.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"44 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128426584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-1
Alexey E. Savin
The talk reveals the transformation logic of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation in the domestic Soviet Marxism. The stages of development of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation are highlighted. The talk demonstrates that the transformation of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation in the Soviet Union takes place against the background of the degeneration of Soviet Marxism in the USSR. In particular, this process determines the weakening of the radicalism of the Russian criticism of Heidegger’s philosophy and the legitimation of Heideggerian studies in Russia.
{"title":"Changing the interpretation of Heidegger's philosophy\u0000in the discourse of Soviet Marxism","authors":"Alexey E. Savin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-31-1","url":null,"abstract":"The talk reveals the transformation logic of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation in the domestic Soviet Marxism. The stages of development of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation are highlighted. The talk demonstrates that the transformation of Heidegger's philosophy interpretation in the Soviet Union takes place against the background of the degeneration of Soviet Marxism in the USSR. In particular, this process determines the weakening of the radicalism of the Russian criticism of Heidegger’s philosophy and the legitimation of Heideggerian studies in Russia.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126791014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-30DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-30-2
A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
The purpose of the article is to change the perception of Hegel's Science of Logic as a classic work that has exclusively «historical» and «philosophical» value. The authors show that it reproduces an ambiguous intellectual situation, which indicates an internal discord in the structure of scientific utterance. This raises the question of the need for a specific action for an adequate reading of Hegel's text, capable of overcoming this ambiguity. The result of using such an action will be that it will remove the critical distance from the reader with respect to the Hegelian work, and will allow him to "enter" into it. This revolution in the perception of the classical philosophical text, according to the authors, should lead to its actualization.
{"title":"Project «Infiltration» or How to survive in the realm of shadows","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-30-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-30-2","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to change the perception of Hegel's Science of Logic as a classic work that has exclusively «historical» and «philosophical» value. The authors show that it reproduces an ambiguous intellectual situation, which indicates an internal discord in the structure of scientific utterance. This raises the question of the need for a specific action for an adequate reading of Hegel's text, capable of overcoming this ambiguity. The result of using such an action will be that it will remove the critical distance from the reader with respect to the Hegelian work, and will allow him to \"enter\" into it. This revolution in the perception of the classical philosophical text, according to the authors, should lead to its actualization.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123212846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-3
Note on the Plan of Nietzsche’s «Beyond Good and Evil» is one of the last of Leo Strauss’ works and his only written work devoted to Nietzsche’s philosophy. In the Note Strauss — in his specific manner of writing — consecutively analyses all nine chapters of «Beyond Good and Evil», trying show peculiar qualities of each chapter. Simultaneously he emphasizes some decisive features of Nietzsche’s philosophy in general. Among which one can name: a new concept of truth (as a result of creation and not of contemplation), anti-Platonism (an attempt of abolition or revaluation of Socrates’ legacy), the problem of nature (a transformation of universal nature into individual nature), perception of modern freedom as a transitional state from one kind of slavery to another which will be much greater and harsher. All of these efforts must give to the reader clearer, though, naturally, partisan image of the philosophy of the future, prelude to which this work constitutes.
{"title":"Note on the Plan of Nietzsche’s «Beyond Good and Evil»","authors":"","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-3","url":null,"abstract":"Note on the Plan of Nietzsche’s «Beyond Good and Evil» is one of the last of Leo Strauss’ works and his only written work devoted to Nietzsche’s philosophy. In the Note Strauss — in his specific manner of writing — consecutively analyses all nine chapters of «Beyond Good and Evil», trying show peculiar qualities of each chapter. Simultaneously he emphasizes some decisive features of Nietzsche’s philosophy in general. Among which one can name: a new concept of truth (as a result of creation and not of contemplation), anti-Platonism (an attempt of abolition or revaluation of Socrates’ legacy), the problem of nature (a transformation of universal nature into individual nature), perception of modern freedom as a transitional state from one kind of slavery to another which will be much greater and harsher. All of these efforts must give to the reader clearer, though, naturally, partisan image of the philosophy of the future, prelude to which this work constitutes.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129359638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-31DOI: 10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-4
Vossii
It is the continuation of the translation of the book by the Dutch theologian, historian and philologist G. J. Fossius "The Art of Historians", which began in No. 23–31 Vox. Chapter 14 reveals a way of discovering historical certainty using the example of the deployment of specific historical causes. The most important elements of evidence for what can be considered historically accurate are considered.
这是荷兰神学家、历史学家和语言学家G. J. fossil对《历史学家的艺术》(the Art of Historians)的翻译的延续，该翻译始于Vox第23-31期。第14章以具体历史原因的运用为例，揭示了一种发现历史确定性的方法。可以被认为是历史准确的证据的最重要的元素被考虑。
{"title":"Ars historica sive de historiae et historices natura historiaque scribende praeceptis commentatio","authors":"Vossii","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-28-4","url":null,"abstract":"It is the continuation of the translation of the book by the Dutch theologian, historian and philologist G. J. Fossius \"The Art of Historians\", which began in No. 23–31 Vox. Chapter 14 reveals a way of discovering historical certainty using the example of the deployment of specific historical causes. The most important elements of evidence for what can be considered historically accurate are considered.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"14 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129189242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：