The establishment of the first Yugoslav state in 1918 was, from a legal point of view, the merger of six quite different legal traditions into one common state formation, and did not bring with it immediate legal unification, which was most evident in the field of civil law. Austrian Civil Code (ABGB) of 1811, as an interesting and endurable sub-type of transnational law, governed almost exclusively, with minimal differences, civil law in most of the territory of the present-day Slovenia and Croatia. Its legal rules survived the Second World War and were applied well into the late 1970s, in part even until the enactment of the new Slovene Code of Obligations in 2002 and the Croatian Obligations Act in 2005. However, since ABGB as a source of law has never been definitively abrogated, its legal rules are still applicable for deciding disputes in both countries, even in the case of the liability of heirs for the deceased’s debts, if the related contract of delivery was concluded as far back as 1960.
{"title":"Prescription of the Decedent’s Debts, Dating From the Time of Old Austrian Civil Code From 1811 (ABGB) in Slovenia and Croatia","authors":"Nana Weber","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.6.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.6.01","url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of the first Yugoslav state in 1918 was, from a legal point of view, the merger of six quite different legal traditions into one common state formation, and did not bring with it immediate legal unification, which was most evident in the field of civil law. Austrian Civil Code (ABGB) of 1811, as an interesting and endurable sub-type of transnational law, governed almost exclusively, with minimal differences, civil law in most of the territory of the present-day Slovenia and Croatia. Its legal rules survived the Second World War and were applied well into the late 1970s, in part even until the enactment of the new Slovene Code of Obligations in 2002 and the Croatian Obligations Act in 2005. However, since ABGB as a source of law has never been definitively abrogated, its legal rules are still applicable for deciding disputes in both countries, even in the case of the liability of heirs for the deceased’s debts, if the related contract of delivery was concluded as far back as 1960.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"164 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140274555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The first issue of the International Memorial Course Marko Petrak – Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems, organised by the Faculty of Law in Zagreb, was held at the Inter-University Centre in Dubrovnik from the 16th to 18th of October 2023. The course was organised in honour and memory of eminent professor and scholar, the late lamented Marko Petrak. The course was planned by the co-directors from different European universities (University of Zagreb; University of Trento; University of Warsaw; Jagiellonian University, Kraków; Autonomous University of Barcelona; University of Sarajevo), while the main organisers from the Faculty of Law in Zagreb were Professor Tomislav Karlović and Associate Professor Henrik-Riko Held. The course was attended by forty participants: students from various European countries (Slovenia, Poland, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, etc.) and eminent professors and scholars from various distinguished European universities and institutions (e.g. Trento, Torino, Ferrara, Macerata, Frankfurt am Main, Kraków, Warsaw, Ljubljana, etc.). The organizers and the participants were also joined by Marko Petrak’s mother, Professor Jelka Petrak (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb). During the course various topics were covered in three thematic blocks: Roman Legal Tradition, Methodology and Teaching of Roman Law in Contemporary World (first day), Roman Legal Issues (first and second day) and Medieval and Canon Law Contributions to the Roman Legal Tradition and vice versa (third day).
{"title":"Review: International Memorial Course Marko Petrak “Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems”, Dubrovnik, 16-18 October 2023","authors":"Henrik-Rko Held","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.07","url":null,"abstract":"The first issue of the International Memorial Course Marko Petrak – Roman Legal Tradition and Contemporary Legal Systems, organised by the Faculty of Law in Zagreb, was held at the Inter-University Centre in Dubrovnik from the 16th to 18th of October 2023. The course was organised in honour and memory of eminent professor and scholar, the late lamented Marko Petrak. The course was planned by the co-directors from different European universities (University of Zagreb; University of Trento; University of Warsaw; Jagiellonian University, Kraków; Autonomous University of Barcelona; University of Sarajevo), while the main organisers from the Faculty of Law in Zagreb were Professor Tomislav Karlović and Associate Professor Henrik-Riko Held. The course was attended by forty participants: students from various European countries (Slovenia, Poland, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, etc.) and eminent professors and scholars from various distinguished European universities and institutions (e.g. Trento, Torino, Ferrara, Macerata, Frankfurt am Main, Kraków, Warsaw, Ljubljana, etc.). The organizers and the participants were also joined by Marko Petrak’s mother, Professor Jelka Petrak (Faculty of Medicine, University of Zagreb). During the course various topics were covered in three thematic blocks: Roman Legal Tradition, Methodology and Teaching of Roman Law in Contemporary World (first day), Roman Legal Issues (first and second day) and Medieval and Canon Law Contributions to the Roman Legal Tradition and vice versa (third day).","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":" 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139197698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present paper deals with the legal capacity and especially the property rights of the growing Christian communities and church institutions within the Roman Empire from the beginning to the Justinianic era. In the beginning, the believers’ charitable donations became the property of the bishops. Later, when the local Christian communities became legal persons, the property of the bishops was separated from the property of the congregations. The local churches could already own real estate before 313. After 313, the legal capacity of the Catholic congregations was confirmed. Later, following the example of local churches, monasteries and finally charitable institutions also became legal entities. Charitable houses were also personal associations and not foundations; independent foundations – similarly to the rules of classical Roman law – did not exist in Justinianic law. The edicts of the Christian emperors greatly facilitated the acquisition of property by local churches, monasteries and charitable institutions. Furthermore, a number of legal rules were made for the special protection of ecclesiastical property.
{"title":"The Property Rights of the Church in the Roman Empire","authors":"Pál Sáry","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.03","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper deals with the legal capacity and especially the property rights of the growing Christian communities and church institutions within the Roman Empire from the beginning to the Justinianic era. In the beginning, the believers’ charitable donations became the property of the bishops. Later, when the local Christian communities became legal persons, the property of the bishops was separated from the property of the congregations. The local churches could already own real estate before 313. After 313, the legal capacity of the Catholic congregations was confirmed. Later, following the example of local churches, monasteries and finally charitable institutions also became legal entities. Charitable houses were also personal associations and not foundations; independent foundations – similarly to the rules of classical Roman law – did not exist in Justinianic law. The edicts of the Christian emperors greatly facilitated the acquisition of property by local churches, monasteries and charitable institutions. Furthermore, a number of legal rules were made for the special protection of ecclesiastical property.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139204516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In Western legal tradition jurisdictions, the transition from the Roman idea of obligatio to the doctrine of the legally binding relationship was not a universal process. Anglo-Saxon lawyers discuss contract and tort theories separately. Different doctrines have emerged from the development of the theory of the legally binding relationship in the Civil Law Tradition. This article shows how this process has played out in the Polish legal discussion. The specific premises of the Polish legal experience were that applied Roman law had little influence in Poland until the end of the 18th century, Austrian law served as the foundation for the development of the Polish doctrine of the legally binding relationship, the Polish Code of Obligations of 1933 replaced French, Austrian, German and Russian law on Polish territories, and the development of the Polish theory of private law after WWII was influenced by the dominance of Marxist theory. Consequently, the Polish legal experience provides a particular perspective on the premises supporting or blocking the relationship between the doctrine of legally binding relationships and social reality.
{"title":"The Idea of Obligation in Polish Law","authors":"Wojciech Dajczak","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.01","url":null,"abstract":"In Western legal tradition jurisdictions, the transition from the Roman idea of obligatio to the doctrine of the legally binding relationship was not a universal process. Anglo-Saxon lawyers discuss contract and tort theories separately. Different doctrines have emerged from the development of the theory of the legally binding relationship in the Civil Law Tradition. This article shows how this process has played out in the Polish legal discussion. The specific premises of the Polish legal experience were that applied Roman law had little influence in Poland until the end of the 18th century, Austrian law served as the foundation for the development of the Polish doctrine of the legally binding relationship, the Polish Code of Obligations of 1933 replaced French, Austrian, German and Russian law on Polish territories, and the development of the Polish theory of private law after WWII was influenced by the dominance of Marxist theory. Consequently, the Polish legal experience provides a particular perspective on the premises supporting or blocking the relationship between the doctrine of legally binding relationships and social reality.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"127 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139197138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article deals with the private enforcement of EU State aid rules in national civil proceedings. This kind of enforcement proved to be highly challenging for national judges, particularly those who ignore the limits of the principle of national procedural autonomy. Since the full understanding of those limits is crucial (also) for private enforcement activities, we focus on the principle of the effectiveness of EU law which, when interpreted and applied correctly, most intensively limits national procedural autonomy. In fact, it is questionable if Member States and their courts and judges enjoy a real or genuine autonomy in the discussed field. For this reason, the article first sets the scene by discussing the fundamental legal concepts and principles as being essential for the private enforcement of EU State aid rules in national civil litigious proceedings, and the interplay between private and public enforcement proceedings. The public enforcement case law is used as a benchmark or guide when dealing with open questions of private enforcement. The article offers a careful analysis of selected legal challenges related to remedies and res judicata, which clearly reveal the limits of the principle of national procedural autonomy as mostly set by the principle of effectiveness of EU law. Finally, the main findings of the article are considered in order to answer the core research question; namely, is there any room left for national procedural autonomy (also) in case of private enforcement of EU State aid rules in proceedings before national civil courts?
{"title":"Private Enforcement of EU State Aid Rules: Is There Any Room for National Procedural Autonomy Left?","authors":"Denis Baghrizabehi, Aleš Ferčič","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.02","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the private enforcement of EU State aid rules in national civil proceedings. This kind of enforcement proved to be highly challenging for national judges, particularly those who ignore the limits of the principle of national procedural autonomy. Since the full understanding of those limits is crucial (also) for private enforcement activities, we focus on the principle of the effectiveness of EU law which, when interpreted and applied correctly, most intensively limits national procedural autonomy. In fact, it is questionable if Member States and their courts and judges enjoy a real or genuine autonomy in the discussed field. For this reason, the article first sets the scene by discussing the fundamental legal concepts and principles as being essential for the private enforcement of EU State aid rules in national civil litigious proceedings, and the interplay between private and public enforcement proceedings. The public enforcement case law is used as a benchmark or guide when dealing with open questions of private enforcement. The article offers a careful analysis of selected legal challenges related to remedies and res judicata, which clearly reveal the limits of the principle of national procedural autonomy as mostly set by the principle of effectiveness of EU law. Finally, the main findings of the article are considered in order to answer the core research question; namely, is there any room left for national procedural autonomy (also) in case of private enforcement of EU State aid rules in proceedings before national civil courts?","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139202320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this article is to assert that jurists advocating for the restrictive interpretation of exceptions in rules, or exceptions to rules, often do so based on an underlying interpretive ideology. To achieve this goal, we will conduct a metatheoretical analysis of how legal theorists have conceptualized the notions of restrictive interpretation and exception. This analysis aims to demonstrate that, when viewed from this perspective, there is no conceptual relationship between these two notions.
{"title":"Restrictive Interpretation of Exceptions: Identification and Hunt of Ideologies","authors":"Víctor García Yzaguirre, Hugo Osorio Morales","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.4","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to assert that jurists advocating for the restrictive interpretation of exceptions in rules, or exceptions to rules, often do so based on an underlying interpretive ideology. To achieve this goal, we will conduct a metatheoretical analysis of how legal theorists have conceptualized the notions of restrictive interpretation and exception. This analysis aims to demonstrate that, when viewed from this perspective, there is no conceptual relationship between these two notions.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139204563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper analyzes the history of abortion and factors that influenced the legalization of abortion in Western society. The question is raised whether abortion should, according to its definition as an objective good or evil, be prohibited or legitimized, or will the legal framework on abortion be regulated as a political construct, independently of the objective moral nature of abortion. The possibility of finding the right answer to the abortion debate is analysed. Conclusion is drawn as to whether abortion can be justified by a political goal, or is it a moral issue independent of politics.
{"title":"Abortion – Political Construct or Moral Issue?","authors":"Katarina Peročević","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.05","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the history of abortion and factors that influenced the legalization of abortion in Western society. The question is raised whether abortion should, according to its definition as an objective good or evil, be prohibited or legitimized, or will the legal framework on abortion be regulated as a political construct, independently of the objective moral nature of abortion. The possibility of finding the right answer to the abortion debate is analysed. Conclusion is drawn as to whether abortion can be justified by a political goal, or is it a moral issue independent of politics.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139207836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The University of Miskolc – Central European Academy in partnership with the Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law, Central-European Association for Comparative Law, Hungarian Association for Comparative Law, Slovak Association for Comparative Law, Scientific Association for Comparative Law Poland, Association for the Advancement of Comparative Law Researches in Serbia, Romanian Association for Comparative Law and the University of Opole on the 1st of December had organized an International Scientific Conference under the title “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age – in specific terms”. The conference was held in the building of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, which additionally increased the solemnity of the event. The aim of the conference was to present the results of the Central European Professorial Network’s “Right to Privacy” research group through analytical and summary presentations by participating professors and to raise awareness about privacy issues. The research project, “Central European Professorial Network 2022”, involved experts in comparative law from seven Central European countries: the Czech Republic, Croatia, Poland, Hungary, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia.
{"title":"Review: International Scientific Conference “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age – In Specific Terms”, Miskolc, 1 December 2022","authors":"Emma Szitás","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.08","url":null,"abstract":"The University of Miskolc – Central European Academy in partnership with the Ferenc Mádl Institute of Comparative Law, Central-European Association for Comparative Law, Hungarian Association for Comparative Law, Slovak Association for Comparative Law, Scientific Association for Comparative Law Poland, Association for the Advancement of Comparative Law Researches in Serbia, Romanian Association for Comparative Law and the University of Opole on the 1st of December had organized an International Scientific Conference under the title “The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age – in specific terms”. The conference was held in the building of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, which additionally increased the solemnity of the event. The aim of the conference was to present the results of the Central European Professorial Network’s “Right to Privacy” research group through analytical and summary presentations by participating professors and to raise awareness about privacy issues. The research project, “Central European Professorial Network 2022”, involved experts in comparative law from seven Central European countries: the Czech Republic, Croatia, Poland, Hungary, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139208271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In law, the debate on the voluntary termination of a pregnancy has not been exempt from the influence of extralegal matters: prejudices, moral and religious beliefs, and political and ideological convictions. Although the focus may be purely on legal aspects, it is subject to multiple subjective interpretations. Consequently, the various constitutional clauses relating to the protection of life (dependent or independent) also serve to support permissive and prohibitionist judicial and legal trends. These two contradictory positions prevent the consideration of the multiple facets of the problem; as a result, it is difficult to obtain a concerted response. Through qualitative research, this paper explores some of the problems related to the traditional approach to abortion. This article highlights some of the barriers to the exercise of abortion rights. It outlines some criteria and methodological tools that could help public officials make decisions and define public policy without stereotypes and guaranteeing women’s human rights. Although at some point access to abortion is recognized, this does not imply that it is an acquired right. On the contrary, it is a right that faces constant risk and threat owing to the influence of the ideological interests.
{"title":"Abortion and Reproductive Autonomy: Some Ideas About Differentiated Approaches","authors":"Natalia Rueda","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.06","url":null,"abstract":"In law, the debate on the voluntary termination of a pregnancy has not been exempt from the influence of extralegal matters: prejudices, moral and religious beliefs, and political and ideological convictions. Although the focus may be purely on legal aspects, it is subject to multiple subjective interpretations. Consequently, the various constitutional clauses relating to the protection of life (dependent or independent) also serve to support permissive and prohibitionist judicial and legal trends. These two contradictory positions prevent the consideration of the multiple facets of the problem; as a result, it is difficult to obtain a concerted response. Through qualitative research, this paper explores some of the problems related to the traditional approach to abortion. This article highlights some of the barriers to the exercise of abortion rights. It outlines some criteria and methodological tools that could help public officials make decisions and define public policy without stereotypes and guaranteeing women’s human rights. Although at some point access to abortion is recognized, this does not imply that it is an acquired right. On the contrary, it is a right that faces constant risk and threat owing to the influence of the ideological interests.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"57 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139196599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U radu se govori o specifičnostima u radnopravnom položaju direktora. Status ove kategorije nije dovoljno jasno uređen, niti teorijski razjašnjen i razrađen. Uređenje radnog statusa direktora uglavnom se do sada oslanjalo na praksu i pozitivno pravo, u domenu radnog i privrednog prava. Bez jasnog radnopravnog koncepta, radnopravni položaj direktora se razlikuje od zemlje do zemlje, pa i od slučaja do slučaja, što generalno vodi prilično neujednačenom statusu i pravnoj nesigurnosti ovih lica. Budući da se radi o temi koja je nedovoljno izučavana u radnopravnoj literaturi, u ovom radu pokušaćemo da iz radnopravnog ugla jasnije prikažemo i analiziramo datu problematiku.
咨询意见讨论了主任法律地位的特殊性。这一类别的地位没有得到足够明确的规定，在理论上也不清晰明确。Uređenje radnog statusa direktora uglavnom se do sada oslanjalo na praksu i pozitivno pravo, u domenu radnog i privrednog prava.在不同的土地上，辐射政策的适用范围也不尽相同，一般来说，在不同的土地上，辐射政策的适用范围也不尽相同。我们将从辐射文学的角度对这一主题进行研究，并对数据问题进行分析。
{"title":"Specifičnosti radnopravnog položaja direktora","authors":"Senad Jašarević","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.23.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.23.4","url":null,"abstract":"U radu se govori o specifičnostima u radnopravnom položaju direktora. Status ove kategorije nije dovoljno jasno uređen, niti teorijski razjašnjen i razrađen. Uređenje radnog statusa direktora uglavnom se do sada oslanjalo na praksu i pozitivno pravo, u domenu radnog i privrednog prava. Bez jasnog radnopravnog koncepta, radnopravni položaj direktora se razlikuje od zemlje do zemlje, pa i od slučaja do slučaja, što generalno vodi prilično neujednačenom statusu i pravnoj nesigurnosti ovih lica. Budući da se radi o temi koja je nedovoljno izučavana u radnopravnoj literaturi, u ovom radu pokušaćemo da iz radnopravnog ugla jasnije prikažemo i analiziramo datu problematiku.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136183908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：