Brian Porter-Szűcs, D. Kałwa, Adam Kożuchowski, W. Marzec, Antoni Porayski-Pomsta
Kolejne forum recenzyjne Praktyki Teoretycznej mierzy się z syntezą najnowszej historii Polski pióra amerykańskiego historyka Briana Porter-Szűcsa. Praca pomyślana jako przeciwwaga dla narracji o Polsce i Polakach charakterystycznej dla ostatnich dziesięcioleci, martyrologicznej i skupionej na sobie, spotkała się z żywym odzewem. Za prowokacyjną uznali tę książkę nie tylko świadomi (lub nie) przedstawiciele „martyrologicznej” ortodoksji i wyznawcy politycznego czy też metodologicznego nacjonalizmu. Do zabrania głosu zaprosiliśmy historyków i historyczki z różnych pokoleń i środowisk naukowych, pracujących w Polsce i w obiegu anglojęzycznym. Uczestnicy forum podejmują kwestie kluczowe dla pisarstwa historycznego i pojęć polskiej historii. Są to m.in. wyzwania syntezy, granice porównania i skalowania punktu widzenia oraz zagadnienie pozycji, z której zabiera głos historyk, zanurzony we własnej wspólnocie językowej czy kulturze narodowej lub przeciwnie: opisujący je z zewnątrz. Na przykładzie omawianej pracy dobrze prześledzić można pułapki, wyzwania i korzyści wynikające z pozycji przyjętej przez piszącego wobec wspólnoty odbiorców. Kolejne uczestniczki forum zwracają uwagę na niebezpieczeństwa związane z wykorzystaniem własnych doświadczeń i wspomnień jako drogowskazu w ocenie wydarzeń historycznych. Wskazują również na kłopoty dotyczące opisywania historii zwykłych ludzi, mimo woli autora często pozostających bezimienną masą. Forum zawiera też odpowiedź Porter-Szűcsa. W całości forum stanowi dobry punkt wyjścia do dyskusji na temat problemów kluczowych dla pisarstwa historycznego.
{"title":"Całkiem zwyczajny kraj. Forum recenzyjne","authors":"Brian Porter-Szűcs, D. Kałwa, Adam Kożuchowski, W. Marzec, Antoni Porayski-Pomsta","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.9","url":null,"abstract":"Kolejne forum recenzyjne Praktyki Teoretycznej mierzy się z syntezą najnowszej historii Polski pióra amerykańskiego historyka Briana Porter-Szűcsa. Praca pomyślana jako przeciwwaga dla narracji o Polsce i Polakach charakterystycznej dla ostatnich dziesięcioleci, martyrologicznej i skupionej na sobie, spotkała się z żywym odzewem. Za prowokacyjną uznali tę książkę nie tylko świadomi (lub nie) przedstawiciele „martyrologicznej” ortodoksji i wyznawcy politycznego czy też metodologicznego nacjonalizmu. Do zabrania głosu zaprosiliśmy historyków i historyczki z różnych pokoleń i środowisk naukowych, pracujących w Polsce i w obiegu anglojęzycznym. Uczestnicy forum podejmują kwestie kluczowe dla pisarstwa historycznego i pojęć polskiej historii. Są to m.in. wyzwania syntezy, granice porównania i skalowania punktu widzenia oraz zagadnienie pozycji, z której zabiera głos historyk, zanurzony we własnej wspólnocie językowej czy kulturze narodowej lub przeciwnie: opisujący je z zewnątrz. Na przykładzie omawianej pracy dobrze prześledzić można pułapki, wyzwania i korzyści wynikające z pozycji przyjętej przez piszącego wobec wspólnoty odbiorców. Kolejne uczestniczki forum zwracają uwagę na niebezpieczeństwa związane z wykorzystaniem własnych doświadczeń i wspomnień jako drogowskazu w ocenie wydarzeń historycznych. Wskazują również na kłopoty dotyczące opisywania historii zwykłych ludzi, mimo woli autora często pozostających bezimienną masą. Forum zawiera też odpowiedź Porter-Szűcsa. W całości forum stanowi dobry punkt wyjścia do dyskusji na temat problemów kluczowych dla pisarstwa historycznego.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49017330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Responding to asylum seekers’ relocation from Sweden to France, migrant solidarity groups have started to share resources and information relevant to the process of deciding about and going through with the journey, and, on arrival in Paris, providing advice on how to make it through sleeping rough and the asylum process in France. The relocation of Afghan asylum seekers to France, has gained a specific form of visibility and presence, in media and in migration rights networks, that we claim has placed the route on the Swedish landscape of migration and border debate. The purpose of this article is to develop the conceptual discussions of mobile commons through an analysis of the networks of and around ‘Swedish Afghans in Paris’. The article explores the ways in which national bordering scapes are both reinscribed, expanded and destabilized by migrant networks and claims. Further, we analyze the phenomenon of ‘Swedish Afghans in Paris’ with attention to the tensions and contradictions in regard to the politics of belonging and mobile commons. The phenomenon of Swedish Afghans in Paris forms a productive starting point for analyzing the conditions of commoning in the context of the Swedish bordering scape; of the ways in which belonging and nationality are claimed in complex and shifting ways; and of the ways in which these commons bridge different places transnationally. The article contributes to scholarly discussions on migrant struggles by developing a nuanced understanding of mobile commons as contestations and entanglements of bordering and claims to national belonging. Thus, we emphasize the ambivalent elements of mobile commoning.
{"title":"Im/Mobile Commons and Trans/National Claims-Making: The Phenomenon of Swedish Afghans in Paris","authors":"Emma Söderman, Vanna Nordling, Maja Sager","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.4","url":null,"abstract":"Responding to asylum seekers’ relocation from Sweden to France, migrant solidarity groups have started to share resources and information relevant to the process of deciding about and going through with the journey, and, on arrival in Paris, providing advice on how to make it through sleeping rough and the asylum process in France. The relocation of Afghan asylum seekers to France, has gained a specific form of visibility and presence, in media and in migration rights networks, that we claim has placed the route on the Swedish landscape of migration and border debate. The purpose of this article is to develop the conceptual discussions of mobile commons through an analysis of the networks of and around ‘Swedish Afghans in Paris’. The article explores the ways in which national bordering scapes are both reinscribed, expanded and destabilized by migrant networks and claims. Further, we analyze the phenomenon of ‘Swedish Afghans in Paris’ with attention to the tensions and contradictions in regard to the politics of belonging and mobile commons. The phenomenon of Swedish Afghans in Paris forms a productive starting point for analyzing the conditions of commoning in the context of the Swedish bordering scape; of the ways in which belonging and nationality are claimed in complex and shifting ways; and of the ways in which these commons bridge different places transnationally. The article contributes to scholarly discussions on migrant struggles by developing a nuanced understanding of mobile commons as contestations and entanglements of bordering and claims to national belonging. Thus, we emphasize the ambivalent elements of mobile commoning.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46850557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper has several objectives linked to Deleuzoguattarian nomadology. After a brief reconstruction of the concept, it proposes a selective reading oriented towards commonist, autonomist and posthumanist tropes. In this reading, nomadism is understood above all as a movement of countering or resisting enclosures and sustaining vital relations with broadly understood commons. It also critiques certain tendencies, present in Deleuze and Guattari, which make such reading unobvious: abstraction, deterritorialization and postmodern Nietzscheanism. The second part of the article is an inquiry on habits, still from a Deleuzoguattarian perspective. It contests the traditional story about private property as a condition of the development of good habits and reveals an array of ‘nomadic habits’ outside of sedentary, bourgeois and capitalist models of social reproduction. It argues that such understood habits can be seen as the anthropological basis of commoning.
{"title":"Anti-Enclosures and Nomadic Habits: Towards a Commonist Reading of Deleuzoguattarian Nomadology","authors":"Jędrzej Brzeziński","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.6","url":null,"abstract":"The paper has several objectives linked to Deleuzoguattarian nomadology. After a brief reconstruction of the concept, it proposes a selective reading oriented towards commonist, autonomist and posthumanist tropes. In this reading, nomadism is understood above all as a movement of countering or resisting enclosures and sustaining vital relations with broadly understood commons. It also critiques certain tendencies, present in Deleuze and Guattari, which make such reading unobvious: abstraction, deterritorialization and postmodern Nietzscheanism. The second part of the article is an inquiry on habits, still from a Deleuzoguattarian perspective. It contests the traditional story about private property as a condition of the development of good habits and reveals an array of ‘nomadic habits’ outside of sedentary, bourgeois and capitalist models of social reproduction. It argues that such understood habits can be seen as the anthropological basis of commoning.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47150311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article is the introduction to the special issue of Theoretical Practice which is dedicated to “the communes and other mobile commons”. The editors of the issue explain how we could conceptualize various attempts to create communes in terms of mobile commons and mobile commoning. Since the exemplary case of the Paris Commune many social movements – urban, rural, indigenous, feminist, or migrant – experimented with communes as alternatives to state and capitalism and redefined in this way the meaning of spatial practices, work and the labor movement. Against the assumption that the commune is a necessary localized and sedentary political form, the authors who contributed to the special issue propose to grasp it from the perspective of subversive mobilities: as kinetic entities. The introduction presents the common ground on which these proposals meet each other and come into dialogue. Various models of mobile commons described here – communal, insurgent, liminal, temporary, latent, care, fugitive, maroon, black, indigenous, undercommons, uncommons, and many more – testify of a recent mobility turn in the theories of the commons.
{"title":"Communes and Other Mobile Commons","authors":"Piotr Juskowiak, Łukasz Moll","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.1","url":null,"abstract":"The article is the introduction to the special issue of Theoretical Practice which is dedicated to “the communes and other mobile commons”. The editors of the issue explain how we could conceptualize various attempts to create communes in terms of mobile commons and mobile commoning. Since the exemplary case of the Paris Commune many social movements – urban, rural, indigenous, feminist, or migrant – experimented with communes as alternatives to state and capitalism and redefined in this way the meaning of spatial practices, work and the labor movement. Against the assumption that the commune is a necessary localized and sedentary political form, the authors who contributed to the special issue propose to grasp it from the perspective of subversive mobilities: as kinetic entities. The introduction presents the common ground on which these proposals meet each other and come into dialogue. Various models of mobile commons described here – communal, insurgent, liminal, temporary, latent, care, fugitive, maroon, black, indigenous, undercommons, uncommons, and many more – testify of a recent mobility turn in the theories of the commons.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44572584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of the book Commun-Commune: penser la Commune de Paris (1871), published on the 150th anniversary of the Paris Commune. The author of the publication aims to reconstruct the entire spectrum of political ideas circulating in “Free Paris” in the spring of 1871. The analysis is carried out from the perspective of the political practices and participants of events. The content of the studied ideas is considered only through the methods of their use and the consequences which influenced history. In the review this is interpreted as a manifestation of thinking close to the theoretical concept of the “social history of ideas”. Another important aspect of the reviewed book is the reflections on the politics of memory and legends, i.e. a mythologized approach to the past understood as a source of cognitive errors that hinder the proper understanding of events.
书评《公社公社:巴黎公社的penser la Commune de Paris》(1871),出版于巴黎公社成立150周年。该出版物的作者旨在重建1871年春天“自由巴黎”中流传的整个政治思想范围。从政治实践和事件参与者的角度进行分析。所研究的思想的内容只能通过它们的使用方法和影响历史的后果来考虑。在评论中,这被解释为一种接近于“社会思想史”理论概念的思维表现。书评的另一个重要方面是对记忆和传说的政治反思,即对过去的神话化方法被理解为阻碍正确理解事件的认知错误的来源。
{"title":"A Social History of the Ideas of the Paris Commune","authors":"S. Knapowski","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.8","url":null,"abstract":"Review of the book Commun-Commune: penser la Commune de Paris (1871), published on the 150th anniversary of the Paris Commune. The author of the publication aims to reconstruct the entire spectrum of political ideas circulating in “Free Paris” in the spring of 1871. The analysis is carried out from the perspective of the political practices and participants of events. The content of the studied ideas is considered only through the methods of their use and the consequences which influenced history. In the review this is interpreted as a manifestation of thinking close to the theoretical concept of the “social history of ideas”. Another important aspect of the reviewed book is the reflections on the politics of memory and legends, i.e. a mythologized approach to the past understood as a source of cognitive errors that hinder the proper understanding of events.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48547001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article was written as an intervention piece in the midst of the massive escape of war refugees to Poland during the first four weeks of the war in Ukraine (24 February-24 March 2022). It aims to map and discuss the condition of grassroots hospitality (and inhospitality) in Poland between Autumn 2021 and Spring 2022. It was a time of shifting context in terms of policies: from the state of exception, migrant push-backs, and walling the border with Belarus, to the policy of solidarity with war refugees, legitimized humanitarianism and open border with Ukraine. In the course of half a year, the frames of bottom-up hospitality on Eastern borders of Poland changed entirely and abruptly. When a couple of thousands of migrants from the Middle East and beyond were camping in the border zone between Belarus and Poland, unable to claim asylum in the EU, practices of solidarity from the bottom up were barely tolerated by Polish state, if not criminalized and condemned. In these realities, structures of support remained an informal, fugitive, and underground network. But with the Russian attack on Ukraine on 24th February 2022, Poland opened its border for the unprecedented arrival of over two million people (during first month of the war) and bottom-up solidarity became a massive response of Polish society, which started to organize shelters, transportation, food and medicines. The same politicians and media which were fighting hospitality to migrants — in terms of ‘crimes of solidarity’ — on the border with Belarus, this time welcomed it with enthusiasm and support. The article proposes to view the nascent rise of grassroots hospitality with Ukrainian migrants in terms of ‘mobile commoning’: precarious, makeshift and autonomous practices of solidarity with people on the move. Mobile commoning is considered here as potential basis for a different migration policy in the EU. At the same time, the Polish case is analyzed as an instructive study of the limits of political universalism which are constructed at and by the borders.
{"title":"Mobile Commoning from the Margins to the Fore? Hostipitality on the Polish-Belarusian and Polish-Ukrainian Borders (2021–2022)","authors":"Łukasz Moll","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.5","url":null,"abstract":"The article was written as an intervention piece in the midst of the massive escape of war refugees to Poland during the first four weeks of the war in Ukraine (24 February-24 March 2022). It aims to map and discuss the condition of grassroots hospitality (and inhospitality) in Poland between Autumn 2021 and Spring 2022. It was a time of shifting context in terms of policies: from the state of exception, migrant push-backs, and walling the border with Belarus, to the policy of solidarity with war refugees, legitimized humanitarianism and open border with Ukraine. In the course of half a year, the frames of bottom-up hospitality on Eastern borders of Poland changed entirely and abruptly. When a couple of thousands of migrants from the Middle East and beyond were camping in the border zone between Belarus and Poland, unable to claim asylum in the EU, practices of solidarity from the bottom up were barely tolerated by Polish state, if not criminalized and condemned. In these realities, structures of support remained an informal, fugitive, and underground network. But with the Russian attack on Ukraine on 24th February 2022, Poland opened its border for the unprecedented arrival of over two million people (during first month of the war) and bottom-up solidarity became a massive response of Polish society, which started to organize shelters, transportation, food and medicines. The same politicians and media which were fighting hospitality to migrants — in terms of ‘crimes of solidarity’ — on the border with Belarus, this time welcomed it with enthusiasm and support. The article proposes to view the nascent rise of grassroots hospitality with Ukrainian migrants in terms of ‘mobile commoning’: precarious, makeshift and autonomous practices of solidarity with people on the move. Mobile commoning is considered here as potential basis for a different migration policy in the EU. At the same time, the Polish case is analyzed as an instructive study of the limits of political universalism which are constructed at and by the borders.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49017530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Over the last two decades, the concept of ‘the commons’ has been rediscovered as a powerful organizing principle in social movements, radical political thought, and critical theory. The concept of commoning has also been adopted within discussions of migration and critical mobilities research. This article will first trace some of these emerging ideas of commoning as a relational practice found in many political mobilizations around ‘reclaiming the commons’. Then it will turn to approaches to commoning that seek to complicate Euro-American histories by centering Indigenous practices of radical commoning, Caribbean and African diaspora mobile commoning, and recent concepts such as undercommons, queer commons, and migrant mobile commoning. The article asks: How can such practices of radical mobile commoning help us envision ways to unmake the existing violent settlings and destructive im/mobilities of enclosure, coloniality, imperialism, and capitalist extraction?
{"title":"Mobile Commoning: Reclaiming Indigenous, Caribbean, Maroon, and Migrant Commons","authors":"M. Sheller","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.2","url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, the concept of ‘the commons’ has been rediscovered as a powerful organizing principle in social movements, radical political thought, and critical theory. The concept of commoning has also been adopted within discussions of migration and critical mobilities research. This article will first trace some of these emerging ideas of commoning as a relational practice found in many political mobilizations around ‘reclaiming the commons’. Then it will turn to approaches to commoning that seek to complicate Euro-American histories by centering Indigenous practices of radical commoning, Caribbean and African diaspora mobile commoning, and recent concepts such as undercommons, queer commons, and migrant mobile commoning. The article asks: How can such practices of radical mobile commoning help us envision ways to unmake the existing violent settlings and destructive im/mobilities of enclosure, coloniality, imperialism, and capitalist extraction?","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44098193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nicos Trimikliniotis, Dimitris Parsanoglou, Vassilis S. Tsianos
This paper examines the effect of the pandemic in the generation of simultaneous global, regional, and local processes as they materialize in realities and the potential for post-pandemic mobile commons. The paper theorizes the matter drawing on studies in the triangle of Cyprus-Greece-Turkey i.e., the south-eastern border of Europe/EU. Mobile commons is theorized in the current context by locating these processes in the pandemic and post-pandemic era, even though the first empirical work was done during the pre-pandemic period. The pandemic brought about an abrupt interruption of what is at the core of global capitalism: mobility. During this period, regimes of exception, derogation and suspension of rights were introduced across all fields of the civic, social, and political life almost all over the world. The concept of mobile commons aims to capture dynamic processes, as an ensemble or matrix of care of the society on the move, generating reciprocity on the move and a sustainability of the geography of the crossings. Digitality is part and parcel of the current migratory processes. Digitality is a space where media technologies of control coexist with the possibilities of alternative media use. To every form of control technology there is a corresponding form of resistance to it. The paper examines how mobile commons resist digital registration and the process that generate a pan-European digital border infrastructure which aims to immobilize people. It illustrates how encounters between groups produce social dialectics within institutions; struggles, conflicts, disagreements, and negotiations occur, but so do new socialities and solidarities in a world in a constant state of being remade.
{"title":"Mobile Commons in the Pre-Pandemic, Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Era: Drawing from Mobility Experiences in Post-Migrant Times","authors":"Nicos Trimikliniotis, Dimitris Parsanoglou, Vassilis S. Tsianos","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.4.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.4.3","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effect of the pandemic in the generation of simultaneous global, regional, and local processes as they materialize in realities and the potential for post-pandemic mobile commons. The paper theorizes the matter drawing on studies in the triangle of Cyprus-Greece-Turkey i.e., the south-eastern border of Europe/EU. Mobile commons is theorized in the current context by locating these processes in the pandemic and post-pandemic era, even though the first empirical work was done during the pre-pandemic period. The pandemic brought about an abrupt interruption of what is at the core of global capitalism: mobility. During this period, regimes of exception, derogation and suspension of rights were introduced across all fields of the civic, social, and political life almost all over the world. The concept of mobile commons aims to capture dynamic processes, as an ensemble or matrix of care of the society on the move, generating reciprocity on the move and a sustainability of the geography of the crossings. Digitality is part and parcel of the current migratory processes. Digitality is a space where media technologies of control coexist with the possibilities of alternative media use. To every form of control technology there is a corresponding form of resistance to it. The paper examines how mobile commons resist digital registration and the process that generate a pan-European digital border infrastructure which aims to immobilize people. It illustrates how encounters between groups produce social dialectics within institutions; struggles, conflicts, disagreements, and negotiations occur, but so do new socialities and solidarities in a world in a constant state of being remade.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43328532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Analizując dyskurs na temat krzemicy i ołowicy w powieściach Hutnik Artura Gruszeckiego i Moja Ołowianko, klęknij na kolanko Marty Fox oraz w reportażach Ołowiane dzieci. Zapomniana epidemia Michała Jędryki i Potosí. Góra, która zjada ludzi Andera Izagirrego, próbuję dowieść istnienia dwu głównych dyskursów choroby przemysłowej w kulturze polskiej XIX, XX i XXI wieku (reportaż Potosí pełni tu rolę suplementu). Jeden z dyskursów jest oparty na romantycznej estetyce melancholii, drugi aktywizuje witalistyczne formy kobiecego buntu. Oba towarzyszą krytycznej refleksji nad nowoczesnością, a prześledzenie ich rozwoju pozwala zrozumieć, że obraz choroby w środowisku górniczo-hutniczym łączy się z innymi społecznymi problemami (jak przemoc wobec kobiet) – jako interwencja bądź zaniechanie zmiany.
{"title":"Dyskursy ołowicy i krzemicy (na podstawie literatury fikcyjnej i dokumentów literackich o przemyśle metalurgicznym)","authors":"Marta Tomczok","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.3.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.3.8","url":null,"abstract":"Analizując dyskurs na temat krzemicy i ołowicy w powieściach Hutnik Artura Gruszeckiego i Moja Ołowianko, klęknij na kolanko Marty Fox oraz w reportażach Ołowiane dzieci. Zapomniana epidemia Michała Jędryki i Potosí. Góra, która zjada ludzi Andera Izagirrego, próbuję dowieść istnienia dwu głównych dyskursów choroby przemysłowej w kulturze polskiej XIX, XX i XXI wieku (reportaż Potosí pełni tu rolę suplementu). Jeden z dyskursów jest oparty na romantycznej estetyce melancholii, drugi aktywizuje witalistyczne formy kobiecego buntu. Oba towarzyszą krytycznej refleksji nad nowoczesnością, a prześledzenie ich rozwoju pozwala zrozumieć, że obraz choroby w środowisku górniczo-hutniczym łączy się z innymi społecznymi problemami (jak przemoc wobec kobiet) – jako interwencja bądź zaniechanie zmiany.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45312887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tekst poświęcony jest analizie twórczości dwojga polskich literatów najmłodszego pokolenia – Tomasza Bąka oraz Olgi Hund – pod kątem tego, jaką rolę pełni humor w prezentowanych przez nich opisach chorób i zaburzeń psychicznych. W artykule przyjęto założenie, że polska literatura najnowsza wypracowuje model narracji o chorobach i zaburzeniach psychicznych, który wyraźnie odchodzi od konwencji i tradycji przedstawiania wyżej wymienionych jako subiektywnej spowiedzi ze zmagań jednostki czy tworzenia kulturowego mitu osoby zaburzonej, mającej wgląd w niedostępne dla innych przestrzenie metafizyczne. Zamiast tego narracje psychiatryczne ujęte są w kontekście pozajednostkowym: społecznym, ekonomicznym, politycznym. Jedną ze strategii odejścia od konfesji i romantyzowania chorób i zaburzeń jest humor – w artykule analizowany głównie za pomocą teorii uwalniania napięcia Sigmunda Freuda. Punktem dojścia analiz jest próba odpowiedzenia na pytanie o cel humorystycznych strategii tekstowych poprzez analizę ich wspólnototwórczego (afiliacyjnego) i krytycznego (agresywnego) potencjału.
{"title":"„Cierpiący na depresję doskonale odnajdują się na bezrobociu”. Humor w narracjach psychiatrycznych Tomasza Bąka i Olgi Hund","authors":"Zuzanna Sala","doi":"10.19195/prt.2022.3.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2022.3.13","url":null,"abstract":"Tekst poświęcony jest analizie twórczości dwojga polskich literatów najmłodszego pokolenia – Tomasza Bąka oraz Olgi Hund – pod kątem tego, jaką rolę pełni humor w prezentowanych przez nich opisach chorób i zaburzeń psychicznych. W artykule przyjęto założenie, że polska literatura najnowsza wypracowuje model narracji o chorobach i zaburzeniach psychicznych, który wyraźnie odchodzi od konwencji i tradycji przedstawiania wyżej wymienionych jako subiektywnej spowiedzi ze zmagań jednostki czy tworzenia kulturowego mitu osoby zaburzonej, mającej wgląd w niedostępne dla innych przestrzenie metafizyczne. Zamiast tego narracje psychiatryczne ujęte są w kontekście pozajednostkowym: społecznym, ekonomicznym, politycznym. Jedną ze strategii odejścia od konfesji i romantyzowania chorób i zaburzeń jest humor – w artykule analizowany głównie za pomocą teorii uwalniania napięcia Sigmunda Freuda. Punktem dojścia analiz jest próba odpowiedzenia na pytanie o cel humorystycznych strategii tekstowych poprzez analizę ich wspólnototwórczego (afiliacyjnego) i krytycznego (agresywnego) potencjału.","PeriodicalId":36093,"journal":{"name":"Praktyka Teoretyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45282180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}