首页 > 最新文献

Global Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis 子宫切除术与甲状腺癌症风险的系统回顾和荟萃分析
Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100122
Roberto Fabiani , Patrizia Rosignoli , Irene Giacchetta , Manuela Chiavarini

Background

Incidence rates of thyroid cancer have increased. Recent studies findings suggest that women who underwent a hysterectomy have an elevated relative risk of thyroid cancer. The aim of our meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence about the association between hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus database were searched for studies published up to 5 September 2023. The PRISMA statement was followed. Heterogeneity was explored with Q statistic and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed with Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results

Sixteen studies met the criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significantly 64% increment of thyroid cancer risk in association with any hysterectomy (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.81; I2 = 28.68%, p = 0.156). Hysterectomy without oophorectomy was a stronger predictor of risk than hysterectomy with oophorectomy. The pooled analysis of data regarding hysterectomy without oophorectomy showed a statistically significant increment of thyroid cancer risk by 59%. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy was associated with an increase of thyroid cancer risk of 39% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.67; I2 = 42.10%, p = 0.049). Significant publication bias was not detected.

Conclusions

Our findings help with decision making around these surgeries.

背景癌症的发病率有所上升。最近的研究结果表明,接受子宫切除术的女性患甲状腺癌症的相对风险升高。我们的荟萃分析的目的是总结子宫切除术与甲状腺癌症风险之间的相关性证据。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中截至2023年9月5日发表的研究。遵循了PRISMA的声明。利用Q统计量和I2统计量对异质性进行了探讨。发表偏倚通过Begg和Egger测试进行评估。结果16项研究符合标准。汇总分析显示,与任何子宫切除术相关的甲状腺癌症风险显著增加64%(OR 1.64,95%CI 1.48-1.81;I2=28.68%,p=0.156)。不经卵巢切除术的子宫切除术比经卵巢切除术的子宫切除手术更能预测风险。未经卵巢切除术的子宫切除术数据汇总分析显示,甲状腺癌症风险增加了59%,具有统计学意义。子宫切除术和卵巢切除术与甲状腺癌症风险增加39%相关(OR 1.39,95%CI 1.16–1.67;I2=42.10%,p=0.049)。未发现显著的发表偏倚。结论我们的研究结果有助于围绕这些手术做出决策。
{"title":"Hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Roberto Fabiani ,&nbsp;Patrizia Rosignoli ,&nbsp;Irene Giacchetta ,&nbsp;Manuela Chiavarini","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100122","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100122","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Incidence rates of thyroid cancer have increased. Recent studies findings suggest that women who underwent a hysterectomy have an elevated relative risk of thyroid cancer. The aim of our meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence about the association between hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus database were searched for studies published up to 5 September 2023. The PRISMA statement was followed. Heterogeneity was explored with Q statistic and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed with Begg's and Egger's tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen studies met the criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significantly 64% increment of thyroid cancer risk in association with any hysterectomy (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.81; I2 = 28.68%, <em>p</em> = 0.156). Hysterectomy without oophorectomy was a stronger predictor of risk than hysterectomy with oophorectomy. The pooled analysis of data regarding hysterectomy without oophorectomy showed a statistically significant increment of thyroid cancer risk by 59%. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy was associated with an increase of thyroid cancer risk of 39% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.67; I2 = 42.10%, <em>p</em> = 0.049). Significant publication bias was not detected.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings help with decision making around these surgeries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582318/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49683126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Literature landscape of neurodevelopment and pesticides: A scoping review of methodologies 神经发育与杀虫剂的文献综述:方法学的范围综述
Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100121
Jennifer E. Reed , Carol J. Burns , Federica Pisa

Pesticides are highly tested and regulated chemicals. There is currently great interest in the role that pesticides may play in childhood neurodevelopment. The objective was to identify and describe the body of evidence and to assess the ability to synthesize effect estimates. The epidemiologic literature from 2011 to 2022 was searched for publications on the association between pesticide exposure and neurodevelopment, behavior, and/or cognition in children. We identified 114 publications, representing 67 unique studies. While organochlorine and other insecticides were the most common classes of pesticides studied, up to 159 different metabolites or active ingredients were reported. Nine pesticides or their metabolites were reported in >10 publications. Similarly, multiple assessment methods were administered across studies to evaluate outcomes in neurodevelopment at ages which ranged from birth to 18 years of age. This scoping review reveals the heterogeneity among published studies with respect to exposures and health outcomes, in the methods used to assess and classify them, and in combinations of the two. This limits the adequacy of the evidence to evaluate specific risk estimates for a particular exposure-outcome pair. Intentional coordination among researchers to increase consistency in methodologies would facilitate the synthesis of results across studies. Research opportunities also exist to validate assumptions in exposure and outcome assessment which are implicit in many of the studies reviewed. In conclusion, there are many ongoing epidemiologic studies with a focus on pesticides and neurodevelopment. The variety of exposures, exposure assessment methods and tests for each outcome can be overwhelming. Interdisciplinary collaboration is recommended to harmonize data collection and to enable meaningful interpretation of the study results across populations.

农药是经过严格测试和管制的化学品。目前人们对杀虫剂在儿童神经发育中可能发挥的作用非常感兴趣。目的是确定和描述证据,并评估综合效果估计的能力。检索2011年至2022年的流行病学文献,寻找有关农药暴露与儿童神经发育、行为和/或认知之间关系的出版物。我们确定了114篇出版物,代表了67项独特的研究。虽然有机氯和其他杀虫剂是所研究的最常见的杀虫剂类别,但据报道,多达159种不同的代谢物或活性成分。在>;10份出版物。同样,研究中采用了多种评估方法来评估从出生到18岁年龄段的神经发育结果。这篇范围界定综述揭示了已发表研究在暴露和健康结果、评估和分类方法以及两者结合方面的异质性。这限制了评估特定暴露结果对的特定风险估计的证据的充分性。研究人员之间有意进行协调,以提高方法的一致性,这将有助于综合各研究的结果。研究机会也存在,以验证暴露和结果评估中的假设,这些假设隐含在所审查的许多研究中。总之,有许多正在进行的流行病学研究,重点是杀虫剂和神经发育。每种结果的暴露、暴露评估方法和测试的多样性可能是压倒性的。建议进行跨学科合作,以协调数据收集,并对不同人群的研究结果进行有意义的解释。
{"title":"Literature landscape of neurodevelopment and pesticides: A scoping review of methodologies","authors":"Jennifer E. Reed ,&nbsp;Carol J. Burns ,&nbsp;Federica Pisa","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100121","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pesticides are highly tested and regulated chemicals. There is currently great interest in the role that pesticides may play in childhood neurodevelopment. The objective was to identify and describe the body of evidence and to assess the ability to synthesize effect estimates. The epidemiologic literature from 2011 to 2022 was searched for publications on the association between pesticide exposure and neurodevelopment, behavior, and/or cognition in children. We identified 114 publications, representing 67 unique studies. While organochlorine and other insecticides were the most common classes of pesticides studied, up to 159 different metabolites or active ingredients were reported. Nine pesticides or their metabolites were reported in &gt;10 publications. Similarly, multiple assessment methods were administered across studies to evaluate outcomes in neurodevelopment at ages which ranged from birth to 18 years of age. This scoping review reveals the heterogeneity among published studies with respect to exposures and health outcomes, in the methods used to assess and classify them, and in combinations of the two. This limits the adequacy of the evidence to evaluate specific risk estimates for a particular exposure-outcome pair. Intentional coordination among researchers to increase consistency in methodologies would facilitate the synthesis of results across studies. Research opportunities also exist to validate assumptions in exposure and outcome assessment which are implicit in many of the studies reviewed. In conclusion, there are many ongoing epidemiologic studies with a focus on pesticides and neurodevelopment. The variety of exposures, exposure assessment methods and tests for each outcome can be overwhelming. Interdisciplinary collaboration is recommended to harmonize data collection and to enable meaningful interpretation of the study results across populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/b6/main.PMC10539886.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41177130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adjustment for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting 新冠肺炎住院环境中对撞机偏差的调整
Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100120
Moslem Taheri Soodejani , Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei , Mohammad Hassan Lotfi , Maryam Nazemipour , Mohammad Ali Mansournia

Background

Causal directed acyclic graphs (cDAGs) are frequently used to identify confounding and collider bias. We demonstrate how to use causal directed acyclic graphs to adjust for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting.

Materials and methods

According to the cDAGs, three types of modeling have been performed. In model 1, only vaccination is entered as an independent variable. In model 2, in addition to vaccination, age is entered the model to adjust for collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization. In model 3, comorbidities are also included for adjustment of collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization in different biasing paths intercepting age and comorbidities.

Results

There was no evidence of the effect of vaccination on preventing death due to Covid-19 in model 1. In the second model, where age was included as a covariate, a protective role for vaccination became evident. In model 3, after including chronic diseases as other covariates, the protective effect was slightly strengthened.

Conclusion

Studying hospitalized patients is subject to collider-stratification bias. Like confounding, this type of selection bias can be adjusted for by inclusion of the risk factors of the outcome which also affect hospitalization in the regression model.

背景因果有向无环图(cDAG)经常被用来识别混淆和对撞机偏差。我们演示了如何在住院的新冠肺炎环境中使用因果有向无环图来调整对撞机偏差。材料和方法根据cDAG,进行了三种类型的建模。在模型1中,只有疫苗接种作为自变量输入。在模型2中,除了接种疫苗外,年龄也被输入到模型中,以调整由于住院条件而产生的对撞机偏差。在模型3中,合并症也被包括在内,用于调整碰撞器偏差,因为住院条件是在不同的偏差路径中截取年龄和合并症。结果在模型1中,没有证据表明疫苗接种对预防新冠肺炎死亡的效果。在第二个模型中,年龄作为协变量,疫苗接种的保护作用变得明显。在模型3中,在将慢性病纳入其他协变量后,保护作用略有增强。结论研究住院患者存在对撞机分层偏差。与混杂因素一样,这种类型的选择偏差可以通过在回归模型中纳入同样影响住院治疗的结果的风险因素来进行调整。
{"title":"Adjustment for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting","authors":"Moslem Taheri Soodejani ,&nbsp;Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassan Lotfi ,&nbsp;Maryam Nazemipour ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100120","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100120","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Causal directed acyclic graphs (cDAGs) are frequently used to identify confounding and collider bias. We demonstrate how to use causal directed acyclic graphs to adjust for collider bias in the hospitalized Covid-19 setting.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>According to the cDAGs, three types of modeling have been performed. In model 1, only vaccination is entered as an independent variable. In model 2, in addition to vaccination, age is entered the model to adjust for collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization. In model 3, comorbidities are also included for adjustment of collider bias due to the conditioning of hospitalization in different biasing paths intercepting age and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no evidence of the effect of vaccination on preventing death due to Covid-19 in model 1. In the second model, where age was included as a covariate, a protective role for vaccination became evident. In model 3, after including chronic diseases as other covariates, the protective effect was slightly strengthened.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Studying hospitalized patients is subject to collider-stratification bias. Like confounding, this type of selection bias can be adjusted for by inclusion of the risk factors of the outcome which also affect hospitalization in the regression model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47703643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Moral controversies and academic public health: Notes on navigating and surviving academic freedom challenges 道德争议与学术公共卫生:关于应对和应对学术自由挑战的说明
Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100119
Tyler J. VanderWeele

Schools of public health often serve both as public health advocacy organizations and as academic units within a university. These two roles, however, can sometimes come into conflict. I experienced this conflict directly at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health in holding and expressing unpopular minority viewpoints on certain moral controversies. In this essay I describe my experiences and their relation to questions of academic freedom, population health promotion, and efforts at working together across differing moral systems.

公共卫生学院通常既是公共卫生倡导组织,又是大学内的学术单位。然而,这两个角色有时会发生冲突。我在哈佛大学陈公共卫生学院直接经历了这种冲突,在某些道德争议上,我持有并表达了不受欢迎的少数人观点。在这篇文章中,我描述了我的经历及其与学术自由、人口健康促进以及在不同道德体系中合作的努力等问题的关系。
{"title":"Moral controversies and academic public health: Notes on navigating and surviving academic freedom challenges","authors":"Tyler J. VanderWeele","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100119","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100119","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Schools of public health often serve both as public health advocacy organizations and as academic units within a university. These two roles, however, can sometimes come into conflict. I experienced this conflict directly at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health in holding and expressing unpopular minority viewpoints on certain moral controversies. In this essay I describe my experiences and their relation to questions of academic freedom, population health promotion, and efforts at working together across differing moral systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41663477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Incidence trend analysis of tuberculosis in Khuzestan Province, southwest of Iran: 2010–2019 伊朗西南部胡齐斯坦省2010-2019年结核病发病趋势分析
Pub Date : 2023-08-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100118
Seyed Mohammad Alavi , Mostafa Enayatrad , Bahman Cheraghian , Neda Amoori

Objectives

Identifying the trend of diseases and its changes over time can be highly important in evaluating the extent and method of achieving strategies for controlling them, developing health indicators, and health planning. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of tuberculosis.

Methods

As a repeated cross-sectional study in which the population under study was a census, this study involved all tuberculosis cases registered in 21 cities of Southwest of Iran, from 2010 to 2019. Data were obtained from the National System of Notification of Tuberculosis and included variables related to age, sex and Disease consequence. Segmented regression models were used to analyze the trend of tuberculosis changes. Also, data analysis software- Join Point Regression version 5.0.2 was used for data analysis.

Results

The results of evaluating the trend of tuberculosis from 2010 to 2019 showed no change in the general trend of tuberculosis and an annual 0.84% (95% CI: ‐5.17 to 6.82) increase in incidence rate is observed in the trend. Also, the findings of join point regression analysis show that between 2010 and 2013, an annual 18.10% (95% CI: 8.78 to 34.89) increase in the incidence of tuberculosis, and between 2013 and 2019, annual −5.42% (95% CI: −10.04 to −2.22) decrease in the incidence of tuberculosis was observed. From 2010 to 2012, a 33.10% (95% CI: 15.77 to 48.06) annual increase in the incidence of tuberculosis in males and − 9.47% (95%CI: −14.02 to −6.33) annual decrease in the incidence of tuberculosis in females was observed.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the incidence of tuberculosis had an upward trend from 2010 to 2013 and a downward trend from 2013 onwards.

目的识别疾病的趋势及其随时间的变化对于评估实现控制疾病策略的程度和方法、制定健康指标和健康规划非常重要。本研究旨在调查肺结核的发病率。方法作为一项重复的横断面研究,研究对象为人口普查,本研究涉及2010年至2019年伊朗西南部21个城市登记的所有结核病病例。数据来自国家结核病通报系统,包括与年龄、性别和疾病后果有关的变量。采用分段回归模型分析肺结核的变化趋势。此外,数据分析软件Join Point Regression 5.0.2版也用于数据分析。结果2010-2019年结核病趋势评估结果显示,结核病的总体趋势没有变化,发病率在趋势中每年增加0.84%(95%CI:5.17-6.82)。此外,连接点回归分析的结果显示,在2010年至2013年期间,结核病发病率每年增加18.10%(95%CI:8.78至34.89),在2013年至2019年期间,肺结核发病率每年下降−5.42%(95%CI:−10.04至−2.22)。从2010年到2012年,男性结核病发病率每年增加33.10%(95%CI:15.77到48.06),女性结核病发病率年下降-9.47%(95%CI:14.02到-6.33)。结论本研究结果表明,2010-2013年结核病发病率呈上升趋势,2013年以后呈下降趋势。
{"title":"Incidence trend analysis of tuberculosis in Khuzestan Province, southwest of Iran: 2010–2019","authors":"Seyed Mohammad Alavi ,&nbsp;Mostafa Enayatrad ,&nbsp;Bahman Cheraghian ,&nbsp;Neda Amoori","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100118","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100118","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Identifying the trend of diseases and its changes over time can be highly important in evaluating the extent and method of achieving strategies for controlling them, developing health indicators, and health planning. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of tuberculosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>As a repeated cross-sectional study in which the population under study was a census, this study involved all tuberculosis cases registered in 21 cities of Southwest of Iran, from 2010 to 2019. Data were obtained from the National System of Notification of Tuberculosis and included variables related to age, sex and Disease consequence. Segmented regression models were used to analyze the trend of tuberculosis changes. Also, data analysis software- Join Point Regression version 5.0.2 was used for data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results of evaluating the trend of tuberculosis from 2010 to 2019 showed no change in the general trend of tuberculosis and an annual 0.84% (95% CI: ‐5.17 to 6.82) increase in incidence rate is observed in the trend. Also, the findings of join point regression analysis show that between 2010 and 2013, an annual 18.10% (95% CI: 8.78 to 34.89) increase in the incidence of tuberculosis, and between 2013 and 2019, annual −5.42% (95% CI: −10.04 to −2.22) decrease in the incidence of tuberculosis was observed. From 2010 to 2012, a 33.10% (95% CI: 15.77 to 48.06) annual increase in the incidence of tuberculosis in males and − 9.47% (95%CI: −14.02 to −6.33) annual decrease in the incidence of tuberculosis in females was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study showed that the incidence of tuberculosis had an upward trend from 2010 to 2013 and a downward trend from 2013 onwards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10101286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives on recent reviews of aspartame cancer epidemiology 阿斯巴甜癌症流行病学研究进展
Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100117
Julie E. Goodman , Denali N. Boon , Maia M. Jack

Aspartame is a dipeptide non-sugar sweetener that was first marketed in the US in carbonated beverages in 1983, before gaining prominence globally. The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) completed evaluations of aspartame and cancer in July 2023. JECFA reaffirmed the safety of aspartame, stating that epidemiology evidence is “not convincing,” and that there are no consistent associations between aspartame and cancer (JECFA/IARC, 2023; JECFA, 2023). JECFA also noted “reverse causality, chance, bias and confounding by socioeconomic or lifestyle factors, or consumption of other dietary components, could not be completely ruled out” in relevant epidemiology studies (JECFA/IARC, 2023). In contrast, IARC stated that there are three “high quality” studies on liver cancer (Riboli, 2023), but that the evidence is limited because “chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out as an explanation for the positive findings” (JECFA/IARC, 2023). IARC does not provide an explanation as to how these studies can be both high quality and have these weaknesses, most notably potential exposure misclassification, or how inconsistent associations from studies with these weaknesses constitute limited evidence. Further, when IARC concludes an agent has limited or inadequate human evidence (and no sufficient animal or strong mechanistic evidence), it classifies that agent as either Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen, or Group 3, not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity. Ultimately, the interpretations of Group 2B and Group 3 classifications are intended to be similar. However, a Group 2B designation may make it appear to scientists and non-scientists alike that the evidence is pointing in the direction of causality. This can lead to unnecessary confusion with respect to the evidence, as well as a perception of a disagreement within WHO regarding aspartame. This apparent contradiction could have been avoided by assigning the IARC classification most consistent with the conclusion that the human evidence for cancer is inadequate: Group 3.

阿斯巴甜是一种二肽无糖甜味剂,1983年首次在美国碳酸饮料中上市,之后在全球范围内崭露头角。联合国粮食及农业组织(粮农组织)/世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)和世界卫生组织癌症国际研究机构(IARC)于2023年7月完成了阿斯巴甜和癌症的评估。JECFA重申了阿斯巴甜的安全性,指出流行病学证据“不令人信服”,阿斯巴甜与癌症之间没有一致的关联(JECFA/IARC,2023;JECFA,2023)。JECFA还指出,在相关流行病学研究中,“不能完全排除由社会经济或生活方式因素或其他饮食成分的消费造成的反向因果关系、偶然性、偏见和混淆”(JECFA/IARC,2023)。相反,IARC表示,有三项关于癌症的“高质量”研究(Riboli,2023),但证据有限,因为“不能排除机会、偏见或混淆作为阳性结果的解释”(JECFA/IARC,2023年)。IARC没有解释这些研究如何既高质量又有这些弱点,最明显的是潜在的暴露错误分类,也没有解释研究与这些弱点的不一致关联如何构成有限的证据。此外,当IARC得出结论,一种药剂具有有限或不充分的人类证据(没有足够的动物或强有力的机制证据)时,它将该药剂归类为2B类,可能是人类致癌物,或第3类,不可按其致癌性分类。最终,对第2B组和第3组分类的解释是相似的。然而,2B组的指定可能会让科学家和非科学家都觉得证据指向因果关系的方向。这可能导致证据方面不必要的混乱,以及世界卫生组织内部对阿斯巴甜的分歧。这种明显的矛盾本可以通过IARC分类来避免,IARC分类与癌症的人类证据不足的结论最为一致:第3组。
{"title":"Perspectives on recent reviews of aspartame cancer epidemiology","authors":"Julie E. Goodman ,&nbsp;Denali N. Boon ,&nbsp;Maia M. Jack","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aspartame is a dipeptide non-sugar sweetener that was first marketed in the US in carbonated beverages in 1983, before gaining prominence globally. The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) completed evaluations of aspartame and cancer in July 2023. JECFA reaffirmed the safety of aspartame, stating that epidemiology evidence is “not convincing,” and that there are no consistent associations between aspartame and cancer (JECFA/IARC, 2023; JECFA, 2023). JECFA also noted “reverse causality, chance, bias and confounding by socioeconomic or lifestyle factors, or consumption of other dietary components, could not be completely ruled out” in relevant epidemiology studies (JECFA/IARC, 2023). In contrast, IARC stated that there are three “high quality” studies on liver cancer (Riboli, 2023), but that the evidence is limited because “chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out as an explanation for the positive findings” (JECFA/IARC, 2023). IARC does not provide an explanation as to how these studies can be both high quality and have these weaknesses, most notably potential exposure misclassification, or how inconsistent associations from studies with these weaknesses constitute limited evidence. Further, when IARC concludes an agent has limited or inadequate human evidence (and no sufficient animal or strong mechanistic evidence), it classifies that agent as either Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen, or Group 3, not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity. Ultimately, the interpretations of Group 2B and Group 3 classifications are intended to be similar. However, a Group 2B designation may make it appear to scientists and non-scientists alike that the evidence is pointing in the direction of causality. This can lead to unnecessary confusion with respect to the evidence, as well as a perception of a disagreement within WHO regarding aspartame. This apparent contradiction could have been avoided by assigning the IARC classification most consistent with the conclusion that the human evidence for cancer is inadequate: Group 3.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/54/main.PMC10446002.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10101280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of corticosteroids types, dexamethasone, and methylprednisolone in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis 新冠肺炎住院患者皮质类固醇类型、地塞米松和甲基强的松龙的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100116
Mina Morsali , Amin Doosti-Irani , Shahideh Amini , Maryam Nazemipour , Mohammad Ali Mansournia , Rasoul Aliannejad

Background

COVID-19 is associated with severe pneumonia lung damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and mortality. In this study, we aimed to compare corticosteroids' effect on the mortality risk in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched using a predesigned search strategy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had compared the corticosteroid drugs were included. The hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to summarize the effect size from the network meta-analysis (NMA).

Results

Out of 329 retrieved references, 12 RCTs with 11,455 participants met the eligibility criteria in this review. The included RCTs formed one network with six treatments. In addition, five treatments in two RCTs were not connected to the network. Methylprednisolone + usual care (UC) versus UC decreased the risk of death by 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.90). Among treatments in the network the highest P-score (0.89) was related to Methylprednisolone + UC.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this NMA it seems Methylprednisolone + UC to be the best treatment option in patients with COVID-ARDS and COVID pneumonia.

背景COVID-19与严重肺炎肺损伤、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和死亡率有关。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较皮质类固醇对COVID-19住院患者死亡风险的影响。方法使用预先设计的搜索策略搜索SubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library和Embase。包括比较皮质类固醇药物的随机对照试验。风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)用于总结网络荟萃分析(NMA)的影响大小。结果在329篇检索到的参考文献中,12项随机对照试验(共11455名参与者)符合本综述的资格标准。纳入的随机对照试验形成了一个包含六种治疗的网络。此外,两个随机对照试验中的五个治疗没有连接到网络。甲基泼尼松+常规护理(UC)与UC相比,死亡风险降低了0.65(95%CI:0.47,0.90)。在网络中的治疗中,最高P分(0.89)与甲基泼尼松龙+UC有关。结论根据该NMA的结果,甲基泼尼龙+UC似乎是新冠肺炎和RDS患者的最佳治疗选择。
{"title":"Comparison of corticosteroids types, dexamethasone, and methylprednisolone in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Mina Morsali ,&nbsp;Amin Doosti-Irani ,&nbsp;Shahideh Amini ,&nbsp;Maryam Nazemipour ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia ,&nbsp;Rasoul Aliannejad","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 is associated with severe pneumonia lung damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and mortality. In this study, we aimed to compare corticosteroids' effect on the mortality risk in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched using a predesigned search strategy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had compared the corticosteroid drugs were included. The hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to summarize the effect size from the network meta-analysis (NMA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 329 retrieved references, 12 RCTs with 11,455 participants met the eligibility criteria in this review. The included RCTs formed one network with six treatments. In addition, five treatments in two RCTs were not connected to the network. Methylprednisolone + usual care (UC) versus UC decreased the risk of death by 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.90). Among treatments in the network the highest P-score (0.89) was related to Methylprednisolone + UC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the results of this NMA it seems Methylprednisolone + UC to be the best treatment option in patients with COVID-ARDS and COVID pneumonia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/75/main.PMC10445991.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10304041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is an exposure-response curve? 什么是暴露反应曲线?
Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100114
Louis Anthony Cox Jr

Exposure-response curves are among the most widely used tools of quantitative health risk assessment. However, we propose that exactly what they mean is usually left ambiguous, making it impossible to answer such fundamental questions as whether and by how much reducing exposure by a stated amount would change average population risks and distributions of individual risks. Recent concepts and computational methods from causal artificial intelligence (CAI) and machine learning (ML) can be applied to clarify what an exposure-response curve means; what other variables are held fixed (and at what levels) in estimating it; and how much inter-individual variability there is around population average exposure-response curves. These advances in conceptual clarity and practical computational methods not only enable epidemiologists and risk analysis practitioners to better quantify population and individual exposure-response curves but also challenge them to specify exactly what exposure-response relationships they seek to quantify and communicate to risk managers and how to use the resulting information to improve risk management decisions.

暴露反应曲线是最广泛使用的定量健康风险评估工具之一。然而,我们认为,它们的确切含义通常是模糊的,因此无法回答诸如按规定的数量减少暴露量是否以及减少多少会改变平均人群风险和个人风险分布等基本问题。因果人工智能(CAI)和机器学习(ML)的最新概念和计算方法可以用于阐明暴露-反应曲线的含义;在估计中,哪些其他变量是固定的(以及在什么水平上);以及在群体平均暴露-反应曲线周围存在多少个体间变异。这些概念清晰性和实用计算方法的进步不仅使流行病学家和风险分析从业者能够更好地量化人群和个人暴露反应曲线,而且还使他们能够准确地指定他们寻求量化和与风险管理者沟通的暴露反应关系,以及如何使用由此产生的信息来提高风险管理决策。
{"title":"What is an exposure-response curve?","authors":"Louis Anthony Cox Jr","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100114","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exposure-response curves are among the most widely used tools of quantitative health risk assessment. However, we propose that exactly what they mean is usually left ambiguous, making it impossible to answer such fundamental questions as whether and by how much reducing exposure by a stated amount would change average population risks and distributions of individual risks. Recent concepts and computational methods from causal artificial intelligence (CAI) and machine learning (ML) can be applied to clarify what an exposure-response curve means; what other variables are held fixed (and at what levels) in estimating it; and how much inter-individual variability there is around population average exposure-response curves. These advances in conceptual clarity and practical computational methods not only enable epidemiologists and risk analysis practitioners to better quantify population and individual exposure-response curves but also challenge them to specify exactly what exposure-response relationships they seek to quantify and communicate to risk managers and how to use the resulting information to improve risk management decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/a5/main.PMC10445976.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10101281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Prevalence of medication adherence and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes and influencing factors: A cross-sectional study 2型糖尿病患者药物依从性和血糖控制的患病率及其影响因素:一项横断面研究
Pub Date : 2023-06-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100113
Budi Suprapti , Zamrotul Izzah , Ade Giriayu Anjani , Mareta Rindang Andarsari , Wenny Putri Nilamsari , Cahyo Wibisono Nugroho

Background

This study aimed to assess medication adherence, glycemic control, and their influencing factors among outpatients at an Indonesian clinic with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with type 2 diabetes at a hospital-based clinic in Surabaya, Indonesia, from September to December 2018. A purposive sampling was used; patients aged 18 years and older, had diabetes and any comorbidity, received hypoglycemic agents, and provided written informed consent were included. The previously validated Brief Medication Questionnaire was used to measure medication adherence, while glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) levels were used to evaluate glycemic control. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with medication adherence and glycemic control.

Results

Of 321 patients enrolled in the study, 268 (83.5%) patients were medication nonadherent. Patients who did not engage regularly in physical activity (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.93) was more likely to be medication adherent. Poor glycemic control (A1C: >7%) was observed in 106 (33.0%) of the patients. Patients who used a combination of oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.09–6.86), did not take biguanide (aOR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.16–6.43), reported hyperglycemia (aOR: 4.24, 95% CI: 1.53–11.81), and had comorbid diseases (aOR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.08–17.34) increased the risk of having poor glycemic control. Patients who were more likely to achieve good glycemic control were male (aOR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20–0.74) and aged older (aOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99).

Conclusions

The proportion of patients who were medication nonadherent was much higher than those with poor glycemic control. Whereas regular exercise was a predictor of nonadherence, age, sex, diabetes medication, not taking biguanide, acute complications, and comorbidity were predictors of poor glycemic control. Therefore, strategies are needed to improve medication adherence and glycemic control.

背景本研究旨在评估印度尼西亚2型糖尿病门诊患者的药物依从性、血糖控制及其影响因素。方法于2018年9月至12月在印度尼西亚泗水的一家医院诊所对2型糖尿病患者进行横断面研究。采用了有目的的抽样;包括年龄在18岁及以上、患有糖尿病和任何合并症、服用降糖药并提供书面知情同意书的患者。先前验证的简短药物问卷用于测量药物依从性,而糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平用于评估血糖控制。二元逻辑回归用于确定与药物依从性和血糖控制相关的因素。结果321例患者中,268例(83.5%)为药物不依从性患者。不经常进行体育活动的患者(aOR:0.49,95%CI:0.26-0.93)更有可能是药物依从性患者。在106名(33.0%)患者中观察到血糖控制不良(A1C:>;7%)。联合使用口服降糖药和胰岛素(aOR:2.74,95%CI:1.09-6.86)、未服用双胍(aOR=2.73,95%CI:1.16–6.43)、报告高血糖(aOR:4.24,95%CI:1.53–11.81)和合并症(aOR:3.33,95%CI=1.08–17.34)的患者增加了血糖控制不良的风险。更可能实现良好血糖控制的患者是男性(aOR:0.39,95%CI:0.20-0.74)和老年人(aOR=0.95,95%CI:0.92–0.99)。结论不坚持服药的患者比例远高于血糖控制不佳的患者。定期运动是不依从性的预测因素,而年龄、性别、糖尿病药物、不服用双胍、急性并发症和合并症是血糖控制不佳的预测因素。因此,需要采取策略来改善药物依从性和血糖控制。
{"title":"Prevalence of medication adherence and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes and influencing factors: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Budi Suprapti ,&nbsp;Zamrotul Izzah ,&nbsp;Ade Giriayu Anjani ,&nbsp;Mareta Rindang Andarsari ,&nbsp;Wenny Putri Nilamsari ,&nbsp;Cahyo Wibisono Nugroho","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100113","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100113","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to assess medication adherence, glycemic control, and their influencing factors among outpatients at an Indonesian clinic with type 2 diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with type 2 diabetes at a hospital-based clinic in Surabaya, Indonesia, from September to December 2018. A purposive sampling was used; patients aged 18 years and older, had diabetes and any comorbidity, received hypoglycemic agents, and provided written informed consent were included. The previously validated Brief Medication Questionnaire was used to measure medication adherence, while glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) levels were used to evaluate glycemic control. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with medication adherence and glycemic control.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 321 patients enrolled in the study, 268 (83.5%) patients were medication nonadherent. Patients who did not engage regularly in physical activity (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.93) was more likely to be medication adherent. Poor glycemic control (A1C: &gt;7%) was observed in 106 (33.0%) of the patients. Patients who used a combination of oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin (aOR: 2.74, 95% CI: 1.09–6.86), did not take biguanide (aOR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.16–6.43), reported hyperglycemia (aOR: 4.24, 95% CI: 1.53–11.81), and had comorbid diseases (aOR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.08–17.34) increased the risk of having poor glycemic control. Patients who were more likely to achieve good glycemic control were male (aOR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20–0.74) and aged older (aOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The proportion of patients who were medication nonadherent was much higher than those with poor glycemic control. Whereas regular exercise was a predictor of nonadherence, age, sex, diabetes medication, not taking biguanide, acute complications, and comorbidity were predictors of poor glycemic control. Therefore, strategies are needed to improve medication adherence and glycemic control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446000/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10483850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Associations of animal source foods, cardiovascular disease history, and health behaviors from the national health and nutrition examination survey: 2013–2016 2013-2016年国家健康和营养检查调查中动物源性食物、心血管疾病史和健康行为的相关性
Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100112
Adam Eckart , Amir Bhochhibhoya , James Stavitz , Pragya Sharma Ghimire , Kathleen Mathieson

Background

Some individuals adopt vegetarian or plant-based diets to improve their health. Observational evidence suggests diets composed of higher amounts of animal-source foods (ASFs) are associated with increased risk for disease and early mortality. In many of these studies, those who ate fewer animal-source foods reported fewer disease risk factors and unhealthy behaviors, which could indicate bias.

Purpose

This study aims to examine the relationships between ASF consumption, health behaviors, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence in a population-representative sample of U.S. civilians controlling for confounders.

Methods

Respondent data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2016 collection years. Collected data included demographics, ASF intake, healthy lifestyle variables, body mass index, and blood lipids.

Results

There was a higher proportion of those with CVD history who consumed red meat (61.3%; C.I. 41.7%–77.8%), but the proportion was lower for white (23.3%; C.I. 12.6%–39.0%) and processed meat (15.4%; C.I. 6.5%–32.3%). When adjusted for sex, the odds of CVD history increased for red meat compared to processed meat consumption (OR 2.95; C.I. 1.14–7.66). Unhealthy lifestyle increased the odds of CVD history by nearly 8-fold (OR 7.8; C.I. 3.44–17.7). Individual factors including age, smoking history, body mass index, and blood lipids, and demographic factors, including education level, race, and income, were also associated with increased odds for CVD history. ROC analysis revealed 77.2% AUC for CVD history classified by individual factors (BMI ≥30 kg/m**2, ≤ 30 min moderate physical activity, smoker, fiber intake ≤25 g, dental visit more than two years ago, and age above 60 years). Three or more factors moderately predicted CVD history when optimized for sensitivity (73.4%) and specificity (71%). Adjusted for sex, the relationship between CVD and moderate physical activity became stronger possibly reflecting lifestyle changes. Despite evidence of lifestyle changes, modifiable risk factors persisted in the CVD group. CVD diagnosis in males was substantially delayed compared to females concerning the sex-specific age cutoff associated with higher risk. The healthy lifestyle group was characterized by earlier CVD diagnosis and fewer overall risk factors compared to the unhealthy lifestyle group.

Conclusion

CVD history was strongly associated with demographic, lifestyle, and dietary factors. Future research should focus on multidimensional models for disease risk stratification and prevention, including individual, behavioral, and sociodemographic factors.

背景一些人采用素食或植物性饮食来改善健康。观察证据表明,由大量动物源性食物(ASF)组成的饮食与疾病风险和早期死亡率的增加有关。在许多此类研究中,那些食用较少动物源性食物的人报告的疾病风险因素和不健康行为较少,这可能表明存在偏见。目的本研究旨在检验ASF消费、健康行为和心血管疾病(CVD)患病率之间的关系,以控制混杂因素的美国平民为代表。方法受访者数据收集自2013-2016年国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)。收集的数据包括人口统计、ASF摄入量、健康生活方式变量、体重指数和血脂。结果有心血管疾病病史的人食用红肉的比例较高(61.3%;C.I.41.7%-77.8%),但食用白肉(23.3%;C.I.12.6%-39.0%)和加工肉(15.4%;C.I.6.5%-32.3%)的比例较低,与食用加工肉相比,红肉患心血管疾病史的几率增加(OR 2.95;C.I.1.14-7.66)。不健康的生活方式使心血管疾病史几率增加了近8倍(OR 7.8;C.I.3.44-17.7)。包括年龄、吸烟史、体重指数和血脂在内的个体因素,以及包括教育水平、种族和收入在内的人口统计因素,也与CVD病史的几率增加有关。ROC分析显示,心血管疾病史的AUC为77.2%,按个体因素分类(BMI≥30 kg/m**2,≤30分钟中等体力活动,吸烟者,纤维摄入量≤25 g,两年以上牙科就诊,年龄60岁以上)。当对敏感性(73.4%)和特异性(71%)进行优化时,三个或更多因素适度预测CVD病史。经性别调整后,心血管疾病和适度体育活动之间的关系变得更强,这可能反映了生活方式的变化。尽管有证据表明生活方式发生了改变,但心血管疾病组中可改变的风险因素仍然存在。与女性相比,男性的心血管疾病诊断明显延迟,因为性别特异性年龄分界与更高的风险相关。与不健康的生活方式组相比,健康生活方式组的特征是CVD诊断更早,总体风险因素更少。结论心血管疾病病史与人口统计学、生活方式和饮食因素密切相关。未来的研究应侧重于疾病风险分层和预防的多维模型,包括个人、行为和社会人口因素。
{"title":"Associations of animal source foods, cardiovascular disease history, and health behaviors from the national health and nutrition examination survey: 2013–2016","authors":"Adam Eckart ,&nbsp;Amir Bhochhibhoya ,&nbsp;James Stavitz ,&nbsp;Pragya Sharma Ghimire ,&nbsp;Kathleen Mathieson","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100112","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Some individuals adopt vegetarian or plant-based diets to improve their health. Observational evidence suggests diets composed of higher amounts of animal-source foods (ASFs) are associated with increased risk for disease and early mortality. In many of these studies, those who ate fewer animal-source foods reported fewer disease risk factors and unhealthy behaviors, which could indicate bias.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to examine the relationships between ASF consumption, health behaviors, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence in a population-representative sample of U.S. civilians controlling for confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Respondent data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2016 collection years. Collected data included demographics, ASF intake, healthy lifestyle variables, body mass index, and blood lipids.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a higher proportion of those with CVD history who consumed red meat (61.3%; C.I. 41.7%–77.8%), but the proportion was lower for white (23.3%; C.I. 12.6%–39.0%) and processed meat (15.4%; C.I. 6.5%–32.3%). When adjusted for sex, the odds of CVD history increased for red meat compared to processed meat consumption (OR 2.95; C.I. 1.14–7.66). Unhealthy lifestyle increased the odds of CVD history by nearly 8-fold (OR 7.8; C.I. 3.44–17.7). Individual factors including age, smoking history, body mass index, and blood lipids, and demographic factors, including education level, race, and income, were also associated with increased odds for CVD history. ROC analysis revealed 77.2% AUC for CVD history classified by individual factors (BMI ≥30 kg/m**2, ≤ 30 min moderate physical activity, smoker, fiber intake ≤25 g, dental visit more than two years ago, and age above 60 years). Three or more factors moderately predicted CVD history when optimized for sensitivity (73.4%) and specificity (71%). Adjusted for sex, the relationship between CVD and moderate physical activity became stronger possibly reflecting lifestyle changes. Despite evidence of lifestyle changes, modifiable risk factors persisted in the CVD group. CVD diagnosis in males was substantially delayed compared to females concerning the sex-specific age cutoff associated with higher risk. The healthy lifestyle group was characterized by earlier CVD diagnosis and fewer overall risk factors compared to the unhealthy lifestyle group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CVD history was strongly associated with demographic, lifestyle, and dietary factors. Future research should focus on multidimensional models for disease risk stratification and prevention, including individual, behavioral, and sociodemographic factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/f4/main.PMC10446117.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10483852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Global Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1