Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.1.0106
F. Karim
{"title":"Celine Ibrahim. Women and Gender in the Qur’an","authors":"F. Karim","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.1.0106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.1.0106","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80411643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0182
Santiago E. Slabodsky
This introduction to the contributions of Atalia Omer, and to the commentators of her landmark book Days of Awe, starts with a question that might already be on the reader’s mind. Why is ReOrient: The Journal of Critical Muslim Studies exploring the lessons from an ethnography of American Jews? For those well-acquainted with the journal, this should not come as a complete surprise. Since its inception, ReOrient has been challenging disciplinary and identity silos in order to both understand global hegemonies, and to contest them. One of the crucial contributions of ReOrient is to constitute a critical space in which to deeply interrogate the reified binaries created by scientific positivism and by secularist narratives. The intellectual project of this journal enables us to ReOrient epistemological interventions, so as to collaborate in bringing in a decolonial future beyond the omnipresent “redemptive” modern/colonial “telos of the West” (Sayyid 2014: 11–14; Editorial Board 2015: 5–7). This forum seeks to explore how Omer’s sophisticated and ground-breaking “critical caretaking” of the social movements emerging in one of the centers of the world, led by one of the most allegedly uniformly “successful” Westernized populations, can help us break down geopolitical barriers (Omer 2019: 122–42). After all, before reading Omer’s innovative text, a reader may have difficulty disagreeing with the fact that Jews in North America (historically anteceded by British and Dutch Caribbean Jews [Rosenblatt, 2022]) have for centuries been a test case for an (often difficult) assimilation of normative Jewry into whiteness. In addition, since the Holocaust – when the center of Jewish normativity definitively left Europe – North America has become without question one of the leading spaces, along with occupied Palestine, of both Jewish Westernization and of the consolidation of a hegemonic model of Jewishness across the world. This is particularly important when many readers of ReOrient (including Omer, the commentators, Editorial Board members, and this writer) are deeply suspicious of theory that is universalized from centers of power/knowledge without considering geopolitical conditions. This is precisely where one of the crucial contributions of Omer’s book, subtitled Re-Imagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, emerges with
{"title":"Exchanges with Atalia Omer: ReOrienting Jewishness","authors":"Santiago E. Slabodsky","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0182","url":null,"abstract":"This introduction to the contributions of Atalia Omer, and to the commentators of her landmark book Days of Awe, starts with a question that might already be on the reader’s mind. Why is ReOrient: The Journal of Critical Muslim Studies exploring the lessons from an ethnography of American Jews? For those well-acquainted with the journal, this should not come as a complete surprise. Since its inception, ReOrient has been challenging disciplinary and identity silos in order to both understand global hegemonies, and to contest them. One of the crucial contributions of ReOrient is to constitute a critical space in which to deeply interrogate the reified binaries created by scientific positivism and by secularist narratives. The intellectual project of this journal enables us to ReOrient epistemological interventions, so as to collaborate in bringing in a decolonial future beyond the omnipresent “redemptive” modern/colonial “telos of the West” (Sayyid 2014: 11–14; Editorial Board 2015: 5–7). This forum seeks to explore how Omer’s sophisticated and ground-breaking “critical caretaking” of the social movements emerging in one of the centers of the world, led by one of the most allegedly uniformly “successful” Westernized populations, can help us break down geopolitical barriers (Omer 2019: 122–42). After all, before reading Omer’s innovative text, a reader may have difficulty disagreeing with the fact that Jews in North America (historically anteceded by British and Dutch Caribbean Jews [Rosenblatt, 2022]) have for centuries been a test case for an (often difficult) assimilation of normative Jewry into whiteness. In addition, since the Holocaust – when the center of Jewish normativity definitively left Europe – North America has become without question one of the leading spaces, along with occupied Palestine, of both Jewish Westernization and of the consolidation of a hegemonic model of Jewishness across the world. This is particularly important when many readers of ReOrient (including Omer, the commentators, Editorial Board members, and this writer) are deeply suspicious of theory that is universalized from centers of power/knowledge without considering geopolitical conditions. This is precisely where one of the crucial contributions of Omer’s book, subtitled Re-Imagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, emerges with","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81190093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0207
S. Sobko
In April 1991, just seven months before the collapse of the Soviet Union, my parents held two sets of airplane tickets: one to occupied Palestine (Israel), and the other to occupied Indigenous American land (the US). Although they had been studying Hebrew in Moscow (with an Orthodox Christian, of all people), my parents ultimately relocated our family, including 5-year-old me, to Kumeyaay land (San Diego, CA) on a refugee visa. The years that followed saw my assimilation into American whiteness, a process accelerated by my interpellation as a whitebodied person and by my rapid adoption of American-accented English. Today, unlike many people of color in the US, I am never asked where I am “really from”. While this ascribed whiteness certainly advantages me in material ways, it also invisibilizes and endangers Soviet Ashkenazi Jewish histories, epistemologies, and cultural practices that I hold dear and that diverge from dominant American (including Jewish American) ways of being. Thus, I inevitably approach Omer’s important book and the American Jewish movement for Palestinian solidarity more broadly through the ongoing contestation of my own racialized assimilation, locating liberatory potential in the barbarism of the margins. My reading of Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians suggests that a reclaimed queer Soviet Jewish immigrant “barbarism” makes deorientalizing and decolonial contributions to the ongoing anti-Zionist rescripting of American Jewishness. In the book, Omer engages Slabodsky’s discussions of barbarism, citing his call to “relocate ‘the basis for a potential epistemological alliance’ among those whom Europe renders ‘barbarians’ via the colonial gaze” (Slabodsky 2014; in Omer 2019: 205). Analogously, in the US context, Soviet Jews are rendered barbaric via the imperialist and orientalizing white American gaze, including that of assimilated white American Jews. From the 1970s to early 1990s, this was operationalized in the Movement to “Save the Soviet Jewry”, an Israeli-instigated American campaign that mobilized liberal humanist logics and intra-Jewish solidarity to facilitate Soviet Jewish resettlement. Decades later, residues of the movement’s condescension linger in American Jewish institutions, including leftist, queer, and
{"title":"Reading “Days of Awe” through Queer Soviet Jewish Immigrant Barbarism","authors":"S. Sobko","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0207","url":null,"abstract":"In April 1991, just seven months before the collapse of the Soviet Union, my parents held two sets of airplane tickets: one to occupied Palestine (Israel), and the other to occupied Indigenous American land (the US). Although they had been studying Hebrew in Moscow (with an Orthodox Christian, of all people), my parents ultimately relocated our family, including 5-year-old me, to Kumeyaay land (San Diego, CA) on a refugee visa. The years that followed saw my assimilation into American whiteness, a process accelerated by my interpellation as a whitebodied person and by my rapid adoption of American-accented English. Today, unlike many people of color in the US, I am never asked where I am “really from”. While this ascribed whiteness certainly advantages me in material ways, it also invisibilizes and endangers Soviet Ashkenazi Jewish histories, epistemologies, and cultural practices that I hold dear and that diverge from dominant American (including Jewish American) ways of being. Thus, I inevitably approach Omer’s important book and the American Jewish movement for Palestinian solidarity more broadly through the ongoing contestation of my own racialized assimilation, locating liberatory potential in the barbarism of the margins. My reading of Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians suggests that a reclaimed queer Soviet Jewish immigrant “barbarism” makes deorientalizing and decolonial contributions to the ongoing anti-Zionist rescripting of American Jewishness. In the book, Omer engages Slabodsky’s discussions of barbarism, citing his call to “relocate ‘the basis for a potential epistemological alliance’ among those whom Europe renders ‘barbarians’ via the colonial gaze” (Slabodsky 2014; in Omer 2019: 205). Analogously, in the US context, Soviet Jews are rendered barbaric via the imperialist and orientalizing white American gaze, including that of assimilated white American Jews. From the 1970s to early 1990s, this was operationalized in the Movement to “Save the Soviet Jewry”, an Israeli-instigated American campaign that mobilized liberal humanist logics and intra-Jewish solidarity to facilitate Soviet Jewish resettlement. Decades later, residues of the movement’s condescension linger in American Jewish institutions, including leftist, queer, and","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77696208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0236
Gehad Hasanin
{"title":"Elizabeth F. Thompson. How the West Stole Democracy from the Arabs: The Syrian Congress of 1920 and the Destruction of Its Liberal-Islamic Alliance","authors":"Gehad Hasanin","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0236","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78547521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0222
Naved Bakali
{"title":"Jasmin Zine. Under Siege: Islamophobia and the 9/11 Generation","authors":"Naved Bakali","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0222","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79263925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.1.0004
S. Ghumkhor
This article explores the political work of forgiveness in a secular liberal West by examining the aftermath of two white supremacist violent events: the Charleston church attack in 2015 and the Christchurch mosque attacks in 2019. The article examines how the exaltation of forgiveness over anger after such events is symptomatic of what David Theo Goldberg (2015) calls the “postracial” turn which denies the structural harm of racism and privileges social unity at a time when racism bears its most violent face. What can be ascertained in centring forgiveness, and therefore the unifying figure of the victim of white supremacist violence, is how the postracial conceals the persistence of race as the secular investment and regulation in the articulation of religion in public life.
本文通过研究2015年查尔斯顿教堂袭击和2019年克赖斯特彻奇清真寺袭击这两起白人至上主义暴力事件的后果，探讨了在世俗自由的西方，宽恕的政治作用。这篇文章探讨了在这些事件之后，宽恕如何超越愤怒，这是David Theo Goldberg(2015)所说的“后种族主义”转向的症状，这种转向否认种族主义的结构性伤害，并在种族主义最暴力的时候赋予社会团结特权。在以宽恕为中心，从而将白人至上主义暴力的受害者统一起来的过程中，可以确定的是，后种族是如何隐藏种族的持久性的，作为宗教在公共生活中表达的世俗投资和监管。
{"title":"Charleston and Christchurch and the Politics of Postracial Forgiveness","authors":"S. Ghumkhor","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.1.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.1.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the political work of forgiveness in a secular liberal West by examining the aftermath of two white supremacist violent events: the Charleston church attack in 2015 and the Christchurch mosque attacks in 2019. The article examines how the exaltation of forgiveness over anger after such events is symptomatic of what David Theo Goldberg (2015) calls the “postracial” turn which denies the structural harm of racism and privileges social unity at a time when racism bears its most violent face. What can be ascertained in centring forgiveness, and therefore the unifying figure of the victim of white supremacist violence, is how the postracial conceals the persistence of race as the secular investment and regulation in the articulation of religion in public life.","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81707198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0225
Marta Panighel
{"title":"Sahar F. Aziz. The Racial Muslim. When Racism Quashes Religious Freedom","authors":"Marta Panighel","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0225","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91311944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.2.0198
Sa’ed Atshan
As I write this essay reflecting on Dr Atalia Omer’s brilliant, and deeply principled, Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, a petition is circulating among academics that touches on issues at the heart of Omer’s book. Over 600 scholars of Jewish and/or Israeli Studies have now signed the petition in support of Dr Liora Halperin, Associate Professor of International Studies, History, and Jewish Studies at the University of Washington. This came after news broke that the University of Washington had stripped Halperin of her endowed Chair in Israel Studies, as a result of objections from a right-wing donor. This donor expressed disapproval of Halperin’s critiques of the Israeli state, and therefore pressed for the return of the five million dollars she had provided for the Chair. Fortunately, Halperin retains her tenured professorship, and will continue her outstanding research, teaching, and service. But her allies insist that the university must honor the commitment they made to her chair and the resources that came with it. This recent major controversy within the Jewish and Israel Studies worlds is merely the latest among a long history. Consider a different case from December 2020. The Forward (formerly known as the Jewish Daily Forward) reported on the standoff between Dr Marc Dollinger, Professor of Jewish Studies at San Francisco State University, and Brandeis University Press. After the murder of George Floyd earlier that year, Dollinger wrote an updated preface for his 2018 book, Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s. The preface included Dollinger’s statement on the increasing integration of white Jewish-American citizens in the United States and their consciousness of how that “reinforced elements of white supremacy in their own lived experience”. Brandeis University Press then received complaints about Dollinger’s words, and engaged the author so that he could edit the preface in order to print the new edition. He declined out of principle and the two parties decided to part ways, with Dollinger seeking a different publisher for his widely read book. While these cases are high-profile and visible, and many are not, Halperin and Dollinger’s experiences are nonetheless emblematic of the pressures that
就在我撰写这篇文章，回顾阿塔利亚·奥默博士的著作《敬畏的日子:与巴勒斯坦人团结一致重新想象犹太人》时，学术界正在流传一份请愿书，涉及奥默书中的核心问题。600多名犹太和/或以色列研究学者现已签署了支持华盛顿大学国际研究、历史和犹太研究副教授Liora Halperin博士的请愿书。此前有消息称，由于一名右翼捐赠者的反对，华盛顿大学(University of Washington)剥夺了哈尔佩林在以色列研究领域的教授职位。这位捐助者表示不赞成哈尔佩林对以色列国家的批评，因此要求归还她提供给主席的500万美元。幸运的是，Halperin保留了她的终身教授职位，并将继续她杰出的研究、教学和服务。但她的盟友坚持认为，大学必须履行他们对她担任主席的承诺，以及随之而来的资源。最近在犹太人和以色列研究界的重大争论仅仅是漫长历史中最近的一次。考虑一下2020年12月的不同情况。《前进报》(前身为《犹太日报》)报道了旧金山州立大学犹太研究教授马克·多林格博士与布兰代斯大学出版社之间的对峙。那年早些时候，乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后，多林格为他2018年出版的新书《黑人权力，犹太政治:重塑20世纪60年代的联盟》(Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in 1960)写了更新的序言。这本书的序言包括多林格对美国白人犹太裔美国公民日益融合的陈述，以及他们意识到这如何“在他们自己的生活经历中加强了白人至上主义的因素”。布兰代斯大学出版社随后收到了对多林格文字的投诉，并聘请了作者，以便他可以编辑序言，以便印刷新版。他出于原则拒绝了，双方决定分道扬镳，多林格为他的广受欢迎的书寻找另一家出版商。尽管这些案例引人注目，引人注目，但许多案例并不引人注目，哈尔佩林和多林格的经历仍然象征着这种压力
{"title":"Academia, Racial, and Social Justice, and Abrahamic Coexistence","authors":"Sa’ed Atshan","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0198","url":null,"abstract":"As I write this essay reflecting on Dr Atalia Omer’s brilliant, and deeply principled, Days of Awe: Reimagining Jewishness in Solidarity with Palestinians, a petition is circulating among academics that touches on issues at the heart of Omer’s book. Over 600 scholars of Jewish and/or Israeli Studies have now signed the petition in support of Dr Liora Halperin, Associate Professor of International Studies, History, and Jewish Studies at the University of Washington. This came after news broke that the University of Washington had stripped Halperin of her endowed Chair in Israel Studies, as a result of objections from a right-wing donor. This donor expressed disapproval of Halperin’s critiques of the Israeli state, and therefore pressed for the return of the five million dollars she had provided for the Chair. Fortunately, Halperin retains her tenured professorship, and will continue her outstanding research, teaching, and service. But her allies insist that the university must honor the commitment they made to her chair and the resources that came with it. This recent major controversy within the Jewish and Israel Studies worlds is merely the latest among a long history. Consider a different case from December 2020. The Forward (formerly known as the Jewish Daily Forward) reported on the standoff between Dr Marc Dollinger, Professor of Jewish Studies at San Francisco State University, and Brandeis University Press. After the murder of George Floyd earlier that year, Dollinger wrote an updated preface for his 2018 book, Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s. The preface included Dollinger’s statement on the increasing integration of white Jewish-American citizens in the United States and their consciousness of how that “reinforced elements of white supremacy in their own lived experience”. Brandeis University Press then received complaints about Dollinger’s words, and engaged the author so that he could edit the preface in order to print the new edition. He declined out of principle and the two parties decided to part ways, with Dollinger seeking a different publisher for his widely read book. While these cases are high-profile and visible, and many are not, Halperin and Dollinger’s experiences are nonetheless emblematic of the pressures that","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80129021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.1.0110
Ismail Patel
{"title":"Shabbir Akhtar. Be Careful with Muhammad! Salman Rushdie and The Battle for Free Speech","authors":"Ismail Patel","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.1.0110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.1.0110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87793612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.13169/reorient.7.1.0096
Irene Zempi
{"title":"Amina Easat-Daas. Muslim Women’s Political Participation in France and Belgium","authors":"Irene Zempi","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.1.0096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.1.0096","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73338149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：