首页 > 最新文献

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia最新文献

英文 中文
An Axiomatization of the Thomasic Ontology of Composition 组合本体的公理化
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0065
Uwe Meixner
This treatise delves into the construction and formalization of a precise theory to encapsulate a pivotal facet of Thomas Aquinas’s ontology. In particular, it focuses on the development of a formal language that is adequate for formulating Aquinas’s understanding of the simultaneous nature of divinity as both an object of subsistence and a universal, individual, and actuating form—a concept evocative of the original Platonic sense of form. The presented axiomatized theory as a medium for expounding the ontological principles enunciated by Thomas Aquinas. A comprehensive set of axioms is systematically justified, exhibiting their congruence with Aquinas’s ontological doctrines. To elucidate this harmony, an extensive series of theorems is deduced, closely aligned with the verbal tenets of Aquinas’s teachings. The inherent consistency of the axiom system is proven by the provision of a geometrico-topological model tailored to support it.
这篇论文深入探讨了一个精确理论的构建和形式化,以概括托马斯·阿奎那本体论的一个关键方面。特别地,它聚焦于一种形式语言的发展,这种形式语言足以形成阿奎那对神的同时本质的理解,即神既是生存的对象,又是普遍的、个体的、驱动的形式——这一概念唤起了原始柏拉图式的形式感。本文将公理化理论作为阐述托马斯·阿奎那所阐述的本体论原则的媒介。一套全面的公理被系统地证明,显示出他们与阿奎那的本体论学说的一致性。为了阐明这种和谐,一系列广泛的定理被推导出来,与阿奎那教导的口头原则密切相关。该公理系统的内在一致性是通过提供一个定制的几何拓扑模型来证明的。
{"title":"An Axiomatization of the Thomasic Ontology of Composition","authors":"Uwe Meixner","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0065","url":null,"abstract":"This treatise delves into the construction and formalization of a precise theory to encapsulate a pivotal facet of Thomas Aquinas’s ontology. In particular, it focuses on the development of a formal language that is adequate for formulating Aquinas’s understanding of the simultaneous nature of divinity as both an object of subsistence and a universal, individual, and actuating form—a concept evocative of the original Platonic sense of form. The presented axiomatized theory as a medium for expounding the ontological principles enunciated by Thomas Aquinas. A comprehensive set of axioms is systematically justified, exhibiting their congruence with Aquinas’s ontological doctrines. To elucidate this harmony, an extensive series of theorems is deduced, closely aligned with the verbal tenets of Aquinas’s teachings. The inherent consistency of the axiom system is proven by the provision of a geometrico-topological model tailored to support it.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validity and Soundness in the First Way 第一种方式的有效性和可靠性
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0137
Graham Oppy
This article critically examines the structure and implications of the argument in ST 1, Q2, A3, associated with Aquinas’ First Way. Our central endeavor is to discern whether a certain disambiguation of point 6 (“There is something that is not moving/changing that moves/changes other things”) can be logically inferred from points 1-5. Through a three-part proof, the article establishes that under specific conditions, it can indeed be inferred. However, this interpretation notably diverges from Aquinas’ intended conclusion and subsequent stronger interpretations of the claim. The paper also engages in discussions surrounding the soundness of the argument, assessing the plausibility of its premises in light of physics and logical analysis. The contribution does not seek to speculate on Aquinas’ understanding or to dismiss his perspective but rather to delineate what follows from his First Way premises, highlighting discrepancies with contemporary views on the nature of existence, particularly the notion of God.
本文批判性地考察了ST 1、Q2、A3中与阿奎那第一道路相关的论点的结构和含义。我们的核心努力是辨别是否可以从第1-5点逻辑地推断出第6点(“有一些没有移动/变化的东西在移动/改变其他东西”)的某种消歧义。本文通过三部分论证,确立了在特定条件下,确实可以进行推断。然而,这种解释明显偏离了阿奎那的预期结论和随后对该主张的更强有力的解释。论文还围绕论点的合理性进行了讨论,根据物理学和逻辑分析评估了其前提的合理性。这篇文章并没有试图推测阿奎那的理解或驳斥他的观点,而是描绘了从他的第一道路前提中得出的结论,强调了与当代关于存在本质的观点的差异,尤其是上帝的概念。
{"title":"Validity and Soundness in the First Way","authors":"Graham Oppy","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0137","url":null,"abstract":"This article critically examines the structure and implications of the argument in ST 1, Q2, A3, associated with Aquinas’ First Way. Our central endeavor is to discern whether a certain disambiguation of point 6 (“There is something that is not moving/changing that moves/changes other things”) can be logically inferred from points 1-5. Through a three-part proof, the article establishes that under specific conditions, it can indeed be inferred. However, this interpretation notably diverges from Aquinas’ intended conclusion and subsequent stronger interpretations of the claim. The paper also engages in discussions surrounding the soundness of the argument, assessing the plausibility of its premises in light of physics and logical analysis. The contribution does not seek to speculate on Aquinas’ understanding or to dismiss his perspective but rather to delineate what follows from his First Way premises, highlighting discrepancies with contemporary views on the nature of existence, particularly the notion of God.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
El universo en mí. La dimensión cosmológica de la existencia desde el pensamiento de Eugen Fink 我内心的宇宙。来自尤金·芬克思想的存在的宇宙维度
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0781
Ángel E. Garrido Maturano
The article reconstructs the cosmic dimension of existence in Fink’s thought. It first analyses man’s openness to the world and then the basic phenomena of existence (eros, work, mastery, death, play). Following he explains human existence as the realisation of a responsive freedom, according to we do not exist from ourselves, but from a way of assuming the aforementioned fundamental phenomena on the basis of which we are born, reside and die in the world. In this sense, the explicitation concludes that these phenomena constitute the cosmic insertion of our existence, since the development of existence from them reflects and symbolises the way in which the cosmos itself emerges and reigns in us. Finally, the article proposes a hermeneutic extension of Fink’s thought, determines the fundamental moods (Stimmungen) and attitudes proper to existence that fully assumes its cosmic character. In this sense, he concludes that a cosmic existence is characterised, first, by a responsible attitude towards the harmonious existence of all beings with whom it shares the world and with whom it realises the order that the world is. Secondly, by a serene attitude towards one’s own mortality, which is assumed as a necessary moment of the world’s becoming. Finally, as an grateful existence to the universe that has allowed it to be and has offered it the possibilities that it is.
本文重构了芬克思想中存在的宇宙维度。它首先分析了人对世界的开放,然后分析了存在的基本现象(爱欲、工作、掌握、死亡、游戏)。接下来,他将人类的存在解释为一种响应自由的实现,根据我们不是从自己存在,而是从假设上述基本现象的方式存在,我们在此基础上出生,居住和死亡在世界上。从这个意义上说,《阐释》的结论是,这些现象构成了我们存在的宇宙插入,因为存在的发展反映和象征了宇宙本身在我们身上出现和统治的方式。最后,本文提出了芬克思想的诠释学延伸,确定了充分体现其宇宙性的基本情绪(Stimmungen)和适合存在的态度。从这个意义上说,他得出结论,宇宙存在的特点是,首先,对与之共享世界的所有生物的和谐存在采取负责任的态度,并与之实现世界的秩序。第二,以一种平静的态度对待自己的死亡,这被认为是世界形成的必要时刻。最后,作为一种感恩的存在,感谢宇宙允许它存在,并为它提供了存在的可能性。
{"title":"El universo en mí. La dimensión cosmológica de la existencia desde el pensamiento de Eugen Fink","authors":"Ángel E. Garrido Maturano","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0781","url":null,"abstract":"The article reconstructs the cosmic dimension of existence in Fink’s thought. It first analyses man’s openness to the world and then the basic phenomena of existence (eros, work, mastery, death, play). Following he explains human existence as the realisation of a responsive freedom, according to we do not exist from ourselves, but from a way of assuming the aforementioned fundamental phenomena on the basis of which we are born, reside and die in the world. In this sense, the explicitation concludes that these phenomena constitute the cosmic insertion of our existence, since the development of existence from them reflects and symbolises the way in which the cosmos itself emerges and reigns in us. Finally, the article proposes a hermeneutic extension of Fink’s thought, determines the fundamental moods (Stimmungen) and attitudes proper to existence that fully assumes its cosmic character. In this sense, he concludes that a cosmic existence is characterised, first, by a responsible attitude towards the harmonious existence of all beings with whom it shares the world and with whom it realises the order that the world is. Secondly, by a serene attitude towards one’s own mortality, which is assumed as a necessary moment of the world’s becoming. Finally, as an grateful existence to the universe that has allowed it to be and has offered it the possibilities that it is.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
L’epistemologia religiosa di Tommaso d’Aquino alla luce del dibattito contemporaneo sulla filosofia cristiana 根据当代关于基督教哲学的辩论,阿奎那的宗教认识论
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0565
Roberto Di Ceglie
In this article, I focus on what emerges from Thomas Aquinas’s religious epistemology once taken into consideration in the light of the contemporary debates on Christian philosophy. I argue that Aquinas profitably explores what is specific to Christian faith – its being under the command of the will moved by God’s grace. According to Aquinas, it seems that it is precisely that which is specific to faith and distinguishes it from human reason that puts believers in an ideal condition to develop intellectual activities.
在这篇文章中,我将重点关注托马斯·阿奎那的宗教认识论,一旦考虑到当代基督教哲学的争论,就会出现什么。我认为,阿奎那有益地探索了基督教信仰的特殊性——它是在上帝的恩典所驱动的意志的指挥下。根据阿奎那的观点,似乎正是信仰特有的东西,并将其与人类理性区分开来,使信徒处于一种理想的状态,以发展智力活动。
{"title":"L’epistemologia religiosa di Tommaso d’Aquino alla luce del dibattito contemporaneo sulla filosofia cristiana","authors":"Roberto Di Ceglie","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0565","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I focus on what emerges from Thomas Aquinas’s religious epistemology once taken into consideration in the light of the contemporary debates on Christian philosophy. I argue that Aquinas profitably explores what is specific to Christian faith – its being under the command of the will moved by God’s grace. According to Aquinas, it seems that it is precisely that which is specific to faith and distinguishes it from human reason that puts believers in an ideal condition to develop intellectual activities.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Outline of Aquinas’s Philosophy of Mind: From Senses to Seeing God 阿奎那心灵哲学提纲:从感官到看见上帝
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0393
Tomasz Kąkol
In this article, I would like to present a brief overview of Aquinas’s philosophy of mind. I try to express the cognitive processes that this model of the mind describes in more modern terminology (e.g., I interpret ‘an image’ [phantasm] as the binding effect of monomodal representations of a perceived object). Characteristic of this model is the postulation, in the case of the human mind, of intellectual abstraction leading to concepts, which requires assuming the existence of the intellect in its active and passive aspects. In this context, a metaphysical conclusion can be drawn about the immortal nature of this intellect, according to Thomas. On the other hand, this model of the mind is not, to all appearances, a variant of Platonic-Cartesian dualism – Aquinas makes several arguments against dualism understood in this way, at least one of which was still raised by (non-Thomistic) critics of Descartes. In addition, Thomas points to the developmental aspect of the human mind and also attempts to describe the possible functioning of the intellect after death.
在这篇文章中,我想简要概述一下阿奎那的心灵哲学。我试图用更现代的术语来表达这种心智模型所描述的认知过程(例如,我将“图像”[幻象]解释为对被感知对象的单模表征的结合效应)。这个模型的特点是假设,在人类思维的情况下,智力抽象导致概念,这需要假设智力在其主动和被动方面存在。根据托马斯的说法,在这种背景下,可以得出一个形而上学的结论,关于这种智力的不朽本质。另一方面,从表面上看,这种思维模式并不是柏拉图-笛卡尔二元论的变体——阿奎那提出了几个反对以这种方式理解二元论的论点,其中至少有一个仍被(非托马斯主义的)笛卡尔的批评者提出。此外,托马斯指出了人类心智的发展方面,并试图描述死后智力的可能功能。
{"title":"An Outline of Aquinas’s Philosophy of Mind: From Senses to Seeing God","authors":"Tomasz Kąkol","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0393","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I would like to present a brief overview of Aquinas’s philosophy of mind. I try to express the cognitive processes that this model of the mind describes in more modern terminology (e.g., I interpret ‘an image’ [phantasm] as the binding effect of monomodal representations of a perceived object). Characteristic of this model is the postulation, in the case of the human mind, of intellectual abstraction leading to concepts, which requires assuming the existence of the intellect in its active and passive aspects. In this context, a metaphysical conclusion can be drawn about the immortal nature of this intellect, according to Thomas. On the other hand, this model of the mind is not, to all appearances, a variant of Platonic-Cartesian dualism – Aquinas makes several arguments against dualism understood in this way, at least one of which was still raised by (non-Thomistic) critics of Descartes. In addition, Thomas points to the developmental aspect of the human mind and also attempts to describe the possible functioning of the intellect after death.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Responsibility for the Effects of our Actions in a Global Society: A Thomistic Approach 在全球社会中对我们行为的影响负责:托马斯主义的方法
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549
Jordan McFadden
As contemporary ethical discourse has highlighted, due to the world’s increasing connectedness, everyday actions can contribute to harmful consequences far removed from everyday experience. I argue that Aquinas’s treatment of consequences can give us insight into our responsibility for such effects of our actions on a global scale. In particular, Aquinas recognises that we are responsible for per accidens effects of good actions performed negligently. Even an unintended per accidens effect may follow with a degree of likelihood that makes it foreseeable, even if not actually foreseen; thus the agent is responsible if he fails to take steps to prevent the negative per accidens effect from occurring. I argue that certain global effects of our actions fit this pattern, namely, they are per accidens effects that nonetheless follow from our actions with a high degree of likelihood. Thus, we have a responsibility to take steps to prevent them.
正如当代伦理话语所强调的那样,由于世界的联系日益紧密,日常行为可能导致与日常经验相距甚远的有害后果。我认为,阿奎那对后果的处理可以让我们洞察到我们对全球范围内我们行为的影响所承担的责任。特别是,阿奎那认识到我们要对过失行为所造成的意外后果负责。即使是意外事故的影响,也可能以某种程度的可能性随之而来,使其成为可预见的,即使实际上无法预见;因此,如果行为人未能采取措施防止负面事故效应的发生,他就要承担责任。我认为,我们行为的某些全球性影响符合这种模式,也就是说,它们是偶然的影响,尽管如此,我们的行为很可能会产生这种影响。因此,我们有责任采取措施加以防止。
{"title":"Responsibility for the Effects of our Actions in a Global Society: A Thomistic Approach","authors":"Jordan McFadden","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549","url":null,"abstract":"As contemporary ethical discourse has highlighted, due to the world’s increasing connectedness, everyday actions can contribute to harmful consequences far removed from everyday experience. I argue that Aquinas’s treatment of consequences can give us insight into our responsibility for such effects of our actions on a global scale. In particular, Aquinas recognises that we are responsible for per accidens effects of good actions performed negligently. Even an unintended per accidens effect may follow with a degree of likelihood that makes it foreseeable, even if not actually foreseen; thus the agent is responsible if he fails to take steps to prevent the negative per accidens effect from occurring. I argue that certain global effects of our actions fit this pattern, namely, they are per accidens effects that nonetheless follow from our actions with a high degree of likelihood. Thus, we have a responsibility to take steps to prevent them.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Becoming and Being a Person through Others: African Philosophy’s Ubuntu and Aquinas’ mutual Indwelling in Comparative Discourse 通过他人成为人与成为人:非洲哲学的乌班图与阿奎那在比较话语中的相互寓居
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0749
Callum David Scott
African Philosophy and St Thomas Aquinas have both been taught in African universities, but the engagement between the continent’s indigenous philosophical tradition and the Catholic intellectual tradition’s preeminent strand, has not been thorough. Presupposing that plural philosophical traditions contribute to the search to better understand, this research embarks upon a comparative analysis of the perspectives of the African ubuntu philosophy and Thomist philosophical conceptualisations of human becoming and being. Through analysis of dimensions of both traditions, it is contended that human fulness arises through relationality. It is argued that in centring on the interpersonal encounter and the consequent recognition of another’s being through mutual engagement, these philosophical traditions open to each other. Further, both traditions contribute toward the ontology of personhood in ubuntu and the good of mutual indwelling, respectively.
非洲大学都教授非洲哲学和圣托马斯·阿奎那,但是非洲大陆的本土哲学传统和天主教知识传统的卓越分支之间的接触还没有彻底。假设多元哲学传统有助于更好地理解,本研究开始对非洲乌班图哲学和托马斯主义哲学对人类形成和存在的概念化的观点进行比较分析。通过对两种传统维度的分析,认为人的完满性是通过关系产生的。有人认为,以人际交往为中心,通过相互接触对他人存在的认识,这些哲学传统相互开放。此外,这两种传统分别对人格本体论和相互内住的好处作出了贡献。
{"title":"Becoming and Being a Person through Others: African Philosophy’s Ubuntu and Aquinas’ mutual Indwelling in Comparative Discourse","authors":"Callum David Scott","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0749","url":null,"abstract":"African Philosophy and St Thomas Aquinas have both been taught in African universities, but the engagement between the continent’s indigenous philosophical tradition and the Catholic intellectual tradition’s preeminent strand, has not been thorough. Presupposing that plural philosophical traditions contribute to the search to better understand, this research embarks upon a comparative analysis of the perspectives of the African ubuntu philosophy and Thomist philosophical conceptualisations of human becoming and being. Through analysis of dimensions of both traditions, it is contended that human fulness arises through relationality. It is argued that in centring on the interpersonal encounter and the consequent recognition of another’s being through mutual engagement, these philosophical traditions open to each other. Further, both traditions contribute toward the ontology of personhood in ubuntu and the good of mutual indwelling, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135314864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aquinas and the Geopolitical Thinking of Pope Francis 阿奎那与教皇方济各的地缘政治思想
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0531
Graham James McAller
This scientific article explores the notion of a Christian geopolitics and its compatibility with realpolitik and international relations. The analysis delves into the perspectives of Pope Francis, John Mearsheimer, and Catholic social thought principles to examine the moral implications of geopolitical strategies. Mearsheimer’s bait and bleed strategy in Ukraine is critiqued for its callousness and disregard for human life, while Francis’s emphasis on personal and social reform highlights the importance of ethics and the universal destination of goods. The article questions whether Christians can engage in realpolitik strategies that perpetuate poverty and violate the principles of human dignity and mercy. It further considers the implications for Catholic leaders in government and military roles, particularly in the context of upcoming U.S. presidential contenders. The analysis ultimately challenges the notion that a Christian geopolitics is a category mistake, advocating for a higher moral road in international relations.
这篇科学文章探讨了基督教地缘政治的概念及其与现实政治和国际关系的兼容性。该分析深入探讨了教皇方济各、约翰·米尔斯海默和天主教社会思想原则的观点,以检验地缘政治战略的道德含义。米尔斯海默在乌克兰的诱饵和流血策略因其冷酷无情和无视人类生命而受到批评,而方济各强调个人和社会改革则强调了道德的重要性和商品的普遍目的。这篇文章质疑基督徒是否可以从事使贫困永久化、违反人类尊严和仁慈原则的现实政治策略。它进一步考虑了天主教领导人在政府和军事角色的影响,特别是在即将到来的美国总统候选人的背景下。该分析最终挑战了基督教地缘政治是一个范畴错误的观念,主张在国际关系中走一条更高的道德道路。
{"title":"Aquinas and the Geopolitical Thinking of Pope Francis","authors":"Graham James McAller","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0531","url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article explores the notion of a Christian geopolitics and its compatibility with realpolitik and international relations. The analysis delves into the perspectives of Pope Francis, John Mearsheimer, and Catholic social thought principles to examine the moral implications of geopolitical strategies. Mearsheimer’s bait and bleed strategy in Ukraine is critiqued for its callousness and disregard for human life, while Francis’s emphasis on personal and social reform highlights the importance of ethics and the universal destination of goods. The article questions whether Christians can engage in realpolitik strategies that perpetuate poverty and violate the principles of human dignity and mercy. It further considers the implications for Catholic leaders in government and military roles, particularly in the context of upcoming U.S. presidential contenders. The analysis ultimately challenges the notion that a Christian geopolitics is a category mistake, advocating for a higher moral road in international relations.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135315352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Das Wesen der menschlichen Handlung bei Thomas von Aquin 。。在托马斯
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0479
Christopher Alexander Franke, Joelma Carvalho
The distinction between actus humanus and actus hominis is the best-known distinction in Thomas Aquinas’ theory of action. A human action (actus humanus) is a special case of an act of a human being (actus hominis). Several acts of our intellect and will form a human action and thereby put it from the realm of pure natural happenings (genus naturae) into the moral realm (genus moris). The paper at hand shows the character and main parameters of Thomas Aquinas’ action theory, especially in the Summa theologiae I-II, quaestiones 6-17. Moreover, it presents Thomas Aquinas’ central idea of what is the essence of a human action. The analysis especially makes use of the element of command (imperium) It shows that, according to Aquinas, acting consists in the intellectually comprehensible self-disclosure of a person and therefore builds the basis for the moral evaluation of human actions.
在托马斯·阿奎那的行动理论中,最著名的区别是“人的行为”和“人的行为”的区别。人的行为(actus humanus)是人的行为(actus hominis)的特殊情况。我们的智力和意志的几个行为将形成一个人的行为,从而把它从纯粹的自然发生的领域(属自然)进入道德领域(属moris)。这篇论文展示了托马斯·阿奎那行动理论的特征和主要参数,特别是在《神学大全》I-II,问题6-17中。此外,它还提出了托马斯·阿奎那关于什么是人类行为的本质的核心思想。这一分析特别利用了命令(统治权)这一要素。它表明,根据阿奎那的观点,行为包含在一个人的智力上可理解的自我表露中,因此建立了对人类行为的道德评价的基础。
{"title":"Das Wesen der menschlichen Handlung bei Thomas von Aquin","authors":"Christopher Alexander Franke, Joelma Carvalho","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0479","url":null,"abstract":"The distinction between actus humanus and actus hominis is the best-known distinction in Thomas Aquinas’ theory of action. A human action (actus humanus) is a special case of an act of a human being (actus hominis). Several acts of our intellect and will form a human action and thereby put it from the realm of pure natural happenings (genus naturae) into the moral realm (genus moris). The paper at hand shows the character and main parameters of Thomas Aquinas’ action theory, especially in the Summa theologiae I-II, quaestiones 6-17. Moreover, it presents Thomas Aquinas’ central idea of what is the essence of a human action. The analysis especially makes use of the element of command (imperium) It shows that, according to Aquinas, acting consists in the intellectually comprehensible self-disclosure of a person and therefore builds the basis for the moral evaluation of human actions.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135315355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Living Well without Knowledge: Uncertainty in the Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas 没有知识也能生活得很好:托马斯·阿奎那道德哲学中的不确定性
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0405
Joshua P. Hochschild
Thomists typically emphasize and defend Aquinas’s “realist” approach to knowledge as an alternative to modern skepticism, but Aquinas is attuned to the common experience of uncertainty, and gives principled reasons for the limits of knowledge across various domains, including especially in the realm of human action. Virtue in general, and Thomistic practical wisdom specifically, can be understood as a habit for responsibly managing choice in the face of imperfect knowledge, unpredictable circumstances, and risk. Several modern specialized disciplines – especially economics, psychology, and various applied social sciences – have highlighted interesting questions about uncertainty and its practical significance, especially in evaluating risk. Emphasizing the role of uncertainty in life is thus not only an invitation for Thomists to notice neglected aspects of Aquinas’s thought, but an opportunity to bring Aquinas’s writings into conversations in other disciplines. Catholic social teaching presents a particularly promising area to engage and learn from those other disciplines in the ongoing elaboration of Thomistic thought.
托马斯主义者通常强调并捍卫阿奎那对知识的“现实主义”方法,将其作为现代怀疑主义的替代方案,但阿奎那与不确定性的共同经验相协调,并为知识在各个领域的局限性给出了原则性的理由,尤其是在人类行为领域。一般来说,美德,特别是托马斯式的实践智慧,可以被理解为面对不完善的知识、不可预测的环境和风险时负责任地管理选择的习惯。一些现代专业学科——尤其是经济学、心理学和各种应用社会科学——强调了关于不确定性及其实际意义的有趣问题,尤其是在评估风险方面。因此,强调不确定性在生活中的作用,不仅是邀请托马斯主义者注意到阿奎那思想中被忽视的方面,而且是将阿奎那的著作带入其他学科对话的机会。天主教社会教学呈现了一个特别有前途的领域,可以参与并从正在进行的托马斯主义思想阐述的其他学科中学习。
{"title":"Living Well without Knowledge: Uncertainty in the Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas","authors":"Joshua P. Hochschild","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0405","url":null,"abstract":"Thomists typically emphasize and defend Aquinas’s “realist” approach to knowledge as an alternative to modern skepticism, but Aquinas is attuned to the common experience of uncertainty, and gives principled reasons for the limits of knowledge across various domains, including especially in the realm of human action. Virtue in general, and Thomistic practical wisdom specifically, can be understood as a habit for responsibly managing choice in the face of imperfect knowledge, unpredictable circumstances, and risk. Several modern specialized disciplines – especially economics, psychology, and various applied social sciences – have highlighted interesting questions about uncertainty and its practical significance, especially in evaluating risk. Emphasizing the role of uncertainty in life is thus not only an invitation for Thomists to notice neglected aspects of Aquinas’s thought, but an opportunity to bring Aquinas’s writings into conversations in other disciplines. Catholic social teaching presents a particularly promising area to engage and learn from those other disciplines in the ongoing elaboration of Thomistic thought.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135315361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1