首页 > 最新文献

AEM Education and Training最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of an automated patient outcome feedback system on emergency medicine resident patient follow-up: An interrupted time series analysis 病人结果自动反馈系统对急诊科住院医生病人随访的影响:间断时间序列分析。
IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11011
Frances Rudolf MD, Leslie C. Oyama MD, Robert El-Kareh MD, MPH

Objectives

Emergency medicine (EM) residents desire, but often lack, reliable feedback of patient outcomes following handoffs to other providers. This gap is a substantial barrier to calibrating their diagnostic decision making and learning. To address this educational priority, we developed and evaluated the Post-Handoff Reports of Outcomes (PHAROS) system—an automated system within our electronic health record (EHR) to deliver provider-specific patient outcome feedback.

Methods

PHAROS includes: (1) individualized lists of patients seen and brief summaries of each case, (2) flags for important posthandoff events, and (3) links to charts to facilitate review. Starting June 2020, we coupled PHAROS with a resident educational session and individualized emails every 2 weeks outlining patients seen, number of posthandoff events, and instructions on how to access the PHAROS system.

Results

From July 2017 through April 2022, we measured the proportion of handoffs followed by reaccessing patients’ charts between 2 and 14 days posthandoff—a proxy for following up on the patient's outcomes. We performed an interrupted time series analysis on this outcome to determine if PHAROS was associated with a significant change in the trend of our outcome over time. Our secondary outcome was the number of times PHAROS was viewed each month. Our primary outcome had a significant increase in the slope over time (+0.13%/month, p = 0.03) after the introduction of the personalized reports and a nonsignificant change (−1.6%, p = 0.07) at the time of the intervention. The median (IQR) number of views of PHAROS per month was 33.2 (23.75–38.75).

Conclusions

The PHAROS system was associated with a significant increase in the rate of posthandoff chart reaccess among EM residents over time. The PHAROS project demonstrated the feasibility of harnessing the capabilities of the EHR to create an automated system to support EM trainee feedback of patient outcomes—a key component of diagnostic calibration and learning.

目的:急诊医学(EM)住院医师希望在与其他医疗服务提供者交接后获得可靠的患者结果反馈,但往往缺乏这种反馈。这一缺陷严重阻碍了他们的诊断决策和学习。为了解决这一教育重点问题,我们开发并评估了交接后结果报告(PHAROS)系统--这是我们电子健康记录(EHR)中的一个自动化系统,用于提供特定于提供者的患者结果反馈:PHAROS 包括(方法:PHAROS 包括:(1)就诊患者的个性化列表和每个病例的简短摘要;(2)重要离职后事件的标记;以及(3)图表链接以方便查看。自 2020 年 6 月起,我们将 PHAROS 与住院医师教育课程和每两周一次的个性化电子邮件相结合,概述就诊患者、离职后事件数量以及如何访问 PHAROS 系统的说明:从 2017 年 7 月到 2022 年 4 月,我们测量了交接后 2 到 14 天内重新访问患者病历的交接比例,这代表了对患者治疗结果的跟进。我们对这一结果进行了间断时间序列分析,以确定 PHAROS 是否与我们的结果随时间推移的趋势发生显著变化有关。我们的次要结果是每月查看 PHAROS 的次数。在引入个性化报告后,我们的主要结果随时间推移的斜率有了明显增加(+0.13%/月,p = 0.03),而在干预期间则没有明显变化(-1.6%,p = 0.07)。PHAROS每月浏览次数的中位数(IQR)为33.2(23.75-38.75):结论:随着时间的推移,PHAROS 系统显著提高了急诊科住院医师离职后重新访问病历的比率。PHAROS 项目证明了利用电子病历的功能创建自动化系统以支持急诊科学员对患者结果进行反馈的可行性--这是诊断校准和学习的关键组成部分。
{"title":"Impact of an automated patient outcome feedback system on emergency medicine resident patient follow-up: An interrupted time series analysis","authors":"Frances Rudolf MD,&nbsp;Leslie C. Oyama MD,&nbsp;Robert El-Kareh MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11011","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aet2.11011","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Emergency medicine (EM) residents desire, but often lack, reliable feedback of patient outcomes following handoffs to other providers. This gap is a substantial barrier to calibrating their diagnostic decision making and learning. To address this educational priority, we developed and evaluated the Post-Handoff Reports of Outcomes (PHAROS) system—an automated system within our electronic health record (EHR) to deliver provider-specific patient outcome feedback.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PHAROS includes: (1) individualized lists of patients seen and brief summaries of each case, (2) flags for important posthandoff events, and (3) links to charts to facilitate review. Starting June 2020, we coupled PHAROS with a resident educational session and individualized emails every 2 weeks outlining patients seen, number of posthandoff events, and instructions on how to access the PHAROS system.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>From July 2017 through April 2022, we measured the proportion of handoffs followed by reaccessing patients’ charts between 2 and 14 days posthandoff—a proxy for following up on the patient's outcomes. We performed an interrupted time series analysis on this outcome to determine if PHAROS was associated with a significant change in the trend of our outcome over time. Our secondary outcome was the number of times PHAROS was viewed each month. Our primary outcome had a significant increase in the slope over time (+0.13%/month, <i>p</i> = 0.03) after the introduction of the personalized reports and a nonsignificant change (−1.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.07) at the time of the intervention. The median (IQR) number of views of PHAROS per month was 33.2 (23.75–38.75).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The PHAROS system was associated with a significant increase in the rate of posthandoff chart reaccess among EM residents over time. The PHAROS project demonstrated the feasibility of harnessing the capabilities of the EHR to create an automated system to support EM trainee feedback of patient outcomes—a key component of diagnostic calibration and learning.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gamification of emergency medicine cost awareness education 急诊医学成本意识教育游戏化
IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11008
Joseph Ray MD

Background

Despite rising costs of health care, physician awareness of costs remains poor. Educational initiatives to remedy this have shown promise, with gamification specifically having success, but actual improvements in physician estimation capabilities have yet to be evaluated.

Objectives

The objective of the study was to assess a gamified educational session for emergency medicine residents that improved their ability to estimate the costs of tests or services commonly performed in their department.

Methods

Participants completed an anonymous presession survey consisting of demographic data, self-analysis on cost awareness, and a 10-item cost estimation list. This was followed by a 1-h interactive gamified education session utilizing rules from the television show The Price is Right. During this session, only three of the survey items had their cost directly discussed such that the remaining seven were able to be assessed solely on estimation improvement instead of short-term knowledge retention. Participants then completed the same survey to assess for improvement in cost awareness.

Results

Sixteen residents at the PGY-2 or PGY-3 level completed the surveys and education session. All self-analysis questions showed significant improvement in the postsession survey. Eight out of the 10 items had significant differences in cost estimation.

Conclusions

A gamified teaching session using The Price is Right rules can improve a resident's estimation capabilities, even on items not directly taught during the session.

背景 尽管医疗成本不断上涨,但医生对成本的认识仍然不足。为弥补这一不足而开展的教育活动已取得了一定成效,其中游戏化教育尤其成功,但医生估算能力的实际提高情况仍有待评估。 研究目的 该研究旨在评估针对急诊科住院医生的游戏化教育课程,以提高他们估算科室常见检查或服务成本的能力。 方法 参与者在课前完成一份匿名调查,调查内容包括人口统计学数据、成本意识自我分析以及一份包含 10 个项目的成本估算清单。随后,利用电视节目 "价格是对的"(The Price is Right)中的规则进行了 1 小时的游戏化互动教育。在这一环节中,只有三个调查项目直接讨论了其成本,因此其余七个调查项目的评估只针对估算的改进,而不是短期知识的保留。然后,参与者完成同样的调查,以评估成本意识的提高情况。 结果 16 名 PGY-2 或 PGY-3 级别的住院医师完成了调查和教育课程。在课后调查中,所有自我分析问题都有明显改善。在 10 个项目中,有 8 个项目在成本估算方面有显著差异。 结论 采用 "The Price is Right "规则的游戏化教学课程可以提高住院医师的估算能力,即使是课程中没有直接教授的项目。
{"title":"Gamification of emergency medicine cost awareness education","authors":"Joseph Ray MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.11008","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite rising costs of health care, physician awareness of costs remains poor. Educational initiatives to remedy this have shown promise, with gamification specifically having success, but actual improvements in physician estimation capabilities have yet to be evaluated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of the study was to assess a gamified educational session for emergency medicine residents that improved their ability to estimate the costs of tests or services commonly performed in their department.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participants completed an anonymous presession survey consisting of demographic data, self-analysis on cost awareness, and a 10-item cost estimation list. This was followed by a 1-h interactive gamified education session utilizing rules from the television show <i>The Price is Right</i>. During this session, only three of the survey items had their cost directly discussed such that the remaining seven were able to be assessed solely on estimation improvement instead of short-term knowledge retention. Participants then completed the same survey to assess for improvement in cost awareness.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixteen residents at the PGY-2 or PGY-3 level completed the surveys and education session. All self-analysis questions showed significant improvement in the postsession survey. Eight out of the 10 items had significant differences in cost estimation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A gamified teaching session using <i>The Price is Right</i> rules can improve a resident's estimation capabilities, even on items not directly taught during the session.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141435621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individualized throughput metric reports for emergency medicine residents: Impact on time to disposition and resident perceptions 为急诊科住院医师提供个性化的吞吐量指标报告:对处置时间和住院医师看法的影响
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11007
Brent A. Becker MD, Andrew J. Bleinberger MD, Brandon J. Golden MD, Amber S. Billet MD

Background

Research suggests that quantitative metric reports can improve the clinical performance of emergency physicians; however, few studies have examined their effects on physicians in training. The primary study objective was to assess the effects of providing emergency medicine (EM) residents with individualized throughput metrics with regard to emergency department (ED) disposition times.

Methods

We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study from January 2021 to December 2022 examining ED disposition times before and after providing upper-level EM residents individualized throughput metrics. Residents received monthly reports of three specific metrics averaged over the preceding 6 months: (1) median time from room to discharge order (Rm2Dc), (2) median time from return of all results to discharge order (Rlts2Dc), and (3) median time from room and to consult order for hospitalization (Rm2Hosp). Overall mean values of the three metrics before and during metric sharing were compared via independent t-test and stratified by level of training and time of year. Adjusted analysis was performed to control for temporal differences between study periods. Testing was conducted at α = 0.05 level of significance.

Results

A total of 35 unique residents were included in the analysis. Overall, mean disposition times were not significantly different before and during reporting of metrics: Rm2Dc (154.8 min vs. 148.9 min, p = 0.109), Rslt2Dc (46.5 min vs. 45.1 min, p = 0.522), and Rm2Hosp (141.7 min vs. 135.7 min, p = 0.257). Subgroup analysis yielded similar results, aside from a significant decrease in mean Rm2Hosp in the postgraduate year-3 (PGY-3) group (145.8 min vs. 124.1 min, p = 0.004). Analysis with adjusted means yielded results similar to those observed with unadjusted data.

Conclusions

Overall, individualized throughput metrics were not correlated with decreased average times to ED disposition for upper-level EM residents; however, in the subset of hospitalized patients seen by PGY-3 residents, we observed a mean decrease of 21.7 min to consultation.

研究背景 研究表明,定量指标报告可以提高急诊医生的临床表现;但是,很少有研究对培训中的医生的效果进行检查。研究的主要目的是评估为急诊医学(EM)住院医生提供个性化吞吐量指标对急诊科(ED)处置时间的影响。 方法 我们在 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究,检查了为高年级急诊科住院医师提供个性化吞吐量指标前后的急诊科处置时间。住院医师每月都会收到前 6 个月平均的三个特定指标报告:(1)从病房到出院单的中位时间(Rm2Dc);(2)从返回所有结果到出院单的中位时间(Rlts2Dc);(3)从病房到住院会诊单的中位时间(Rm2Hosp)。通过独立 t 检验比较了指标共享前和共享期间三个指标的总体平均值,并按培训水平和时间进行了分层。为控制研究期间的时间差异,进行了调整分析。检验的显著性水平为 α = 0.05。 结果 共有 35 位居民参与了分析。总体而言,报告指标之前和期间的平均处置时间没有明显差异:Rm2Dc(154.8 分钟 vs. 148.9 分钟,p = 0.109)、Rslt2Dc(46.5 分钟 vs. 45.1 分钟,p = 0.522)和 Rm2Hosp(141.7 分钟 vs. 135.7 分钟,p = 0.257)。分组分析结果相似,但研究生三年级(PGY-3)组的平均 Rm2Hosp 显著下降(145.8 分钟对 124.1 分钟,p = 0.004)。调整后的平均值分析结果与未调整数据的结果相似。 结论 总体而言,个性化吞吐量指标与高年级急诊科住院医师急诊室处置平均时间的缩短无关;但是,在由 PGY-3 级住院医师诊治的住院患者子集中,我们观察到会诊平均时间缩短了 21.7 分钟。
{"title":"Individualized throughput metric reports for emergency medicine residents: Impact on time to disposition and resident perceptions","authors":"Brent A. Becker MD,&nbsp;Andrew J. Bleinberger MD,&nbsp;Brandon J. Golden MD,&nbsp;Amber S. Billet MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.11007","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Research suggests that quantitative metric reports can improve the clinical performance of emergency physicians; however, few studies have examined their effects on physicians in training. The primary study objective was to assess the effects of providing emergency medicine (EM) residents with individualized throughput metrics with regard to emergency department (ED) disposition times.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study from January 2021 to December 2022 examining ED disposition times before and after providing upper-level EM residents individualized throughput metrics. Residents received monthly reports of three specific metrics averaged over the preceding 6 months: (1) median time from room to discharge order (Rm2Dc), (2) median time from return of all results to discharge order (Rlts2Dc), and (3) median time from room and to consult order for hospitalization (Rm2Hosp). Overall mean values of the three metrics before and during metric sharing were compared via independent <i>t</i>-test and stratified by level of training and time of year. Adjusted analysis was performed to control for temporal differences between study periods. Testing was conducted at α = 0.05 level of significance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 35 unique residents were included in the analysis. Overall, mean disposition times were not significantly different before and during reporting of metrics: Rm2Dc (154.8 min vs. 148.9 min, <i>p</i> = 0.109), Rslt2Dc (46.5 min vs. 45.1 min, <i>p</i> = 0.522), and Rm2Hosp (141.7 min vs. 135.7 min, <i>p</i> = 0.257). Subgroup analysis yielded similar results, aside from a significant decrease in mean Rm2Hosp in the postgraduate year-3 (PGY-3) group (145.8 min vs. 124.1 min, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Analysis with adjusted means yielded results similar to those observed with unadjusted data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Overall, individualized throughput metrics were not correlated with decreased average times to ED disposition for upper-level EM residents; however, in the subset of hospitalized patients seen by PGY-3 residents, we observed a mean decrease of 21.7 min to consultation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141430208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Losses and wins 输赢
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11005
Elizabeth L. Chang MD

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

作者声明没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Losses and wins","authors":"Elizabeth L. Chang MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11005","DOIUrl":"10.1002/aet2.11005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141421301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Creation of a resident-led medical student education committee 成立由住院医师领导的医学生教育委员会
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11004
Stephanie Hess MD, Anita Knopov MD, Christina Matulis MD, Eric Ebert MD, Danielle Kerrigan MD, Kaitlin Lipner MD, Jeffrey Savarino MD, MPH, Brian Clyne MD, MHL

The Resident-Student Education Committee (RSEC) is a novel approach to integrate and expand medical student education within an emergency medicine (EM) residency at a large academic center. There is a paucity of literature on such programs and there is no documentation of longitudinal initiatives with residents serving as specialty-specific advisors to students throughout medical school. The goals of creating the RSEC were to expand and improve the student educational experiences in EM, strengthen the connection between students and EM residents, and foster resident career development through sustainable leadership and teaching opportunities. The RSEC was composed of three divisions: the Preclinical Division aimed to increase student exposure to EM through didactics, skill sessions, simulation, and shadowing; the Clinical Division intended to enhance the student experience during clinical EM rotations through simulation and skill sessions and resident-student socials; and the Mentoring Division focused on advising students applying into EM through informational panels and one-on-one resident mentorship. Outcome measures include students applying into EM residency, which saw an increase from 8.9% prior to the RSEC's creation in 2020 to 12.9% in 2023, despite a national decline in EM applicants. Survey data also indicates favorable student preclinical experiences and improved confidence in clinical skills. The RSEC model, with its structured approach, resident leadership, and clear objectives, presents a sustainable and replicable framework for other residency programs seeking to enhance medical student education and promote resident engagement in teaching. Future directions include expanding shadowing opportunities and procedural skills teaching, introducing career mentorship earlier in the medical education timeline, and tracking outcomes data for continuous assessment and improvement.

住院医师-学生教育委员会(Resident-Student Education Committee,RSEC)是一种在大型学术中心的急诊医学(EM)住院医师中整合并扩展医学生教育的新方法。关于此类项目的文献极少,也没有关于住院医师在整个医学院期间担任学生专科顾问的纵向举措的文献。创建RSEC的目标是扩大和改善学生在急诊科的教育经历,加强学生与急诊科住院医师之间的联系,并通过可持续的领导和教学机会促进住院医师的职业发展。RSEC由三个分部组成:临床前分部旨在通过教学、技能课程、模拟和跟班学习增加学生对电磁学的接触;临床分部旨在通过模拟和技能课程以及住院医师-学生社交活动增强学生在电磁学临床轮转期间的体验;指导分部侧重于通过信息小组和一对一住院医师指导为申请进入电磁学的学生提供建议。衡量成果的指标包括申请成为急诊科住院医师的学生人数,尽管全国急诊科申请人数有所下降,但申请人数从2020年RSEC成立前的8.9%增加到2023年的12.9%。调查数据还显示,学生的临床前体验良好,对临床技能的信心也有所提高。RSEC模式以其结构化的方法、住院医师的领导力和明确的目标,为其他住院医师培训项目提供了一个可持续和可复制的框架,以加强医学生教育和促进住院医师参与教学。未来的发展方向包括扩大影子教学和程序技能教学的机会,在医学教育的早期阶段引入职业导师制,以及跟踪结果数据以进行持续评估和改进。
{"title":"Creation of a resident-led medical student education committee","authors":"Stephanie Hess MD,&nbsp;Anita Knopov MD,&nbsp;Christina Matulis MD,&nbsp;Eric Ebert MD,&nbsp;Danielle Kerrigan MD,&nbsp;Kaitlin Lipner MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey Savarino MD, MPH,&nbsp;Brian Clyne MD, MHL","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.11004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Resident-Student Education Committee (RSEC) is a novel approach to integrate and expand medical student education within an emergency medicine (EM) residency at a large academic center. There is a paucity of literature on such programs and there is no documentation of longitudinal initiatives with residents serving as specialty-specific advisors to students throughout medical school. The goals of creating the RSEC were to expand and improve the student educational experiences in EM, strengthen the connection between students and EM residents, and foster resident career development through sustainable leadership and teaching opportunities. The RSEC was composed of three divisions: the Preclinical Division aimed to increase student exposure to EM through didactics, skill sessions, simulation, and shadowing; the Clinical Division intended to enhance the student experience during clinical EM rotations through simulation and skill sessions and resident-student socials; and the Mentoring Division focused on advising students applying into EM through informational panels and one-on-one resident mentorship. Outcome measures include students applying into EM residency, which saw an increase from 8.9% prior to the RSEC's creation in 2020 to 12.9% in 2023, despite a national decline in EM applicants. Survey data also indicates favorable student preclinical experiences and improved confidence in clinical skills. The RSEC model, with its structured approach, resident leadership, and clear objectives, presents a sustainable and replicable framework for other residency programs seeking to enhance medical student education and promote resident engagement in teaching. Future directions include expanding shadowing opportunities and procedural skills teaching, introducing career mentorship earlier in the medical education timeline, and tracking outcomes data for continuous assessment and improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141430216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making goals count: A theory-informed approach to on-shift learning goals 让目标发挥作用:基于理论的轮班学习目标方法
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10993
Max Griffith MD, Ivan Zvonar MD, Alexander Garrett MD, Naeem Bayaa MD

Supervisors often ask emergency medicine trainees for their learning goals at the start of a clinical shift, though they may do so without considering the reasons for this practice. Recognizing the underlying rationale for voicing on-shift learning goals and proactively considering solutions for some of the associated challenges can help learners and supervisors employ this practice to its full potential. Goal articulation is rooted in educational principles such as self-regulated learning, targeted performance feedback, and collaborative relationships between learner and supervisor. Despite the potential for on-shift learning goals to augment learning, there are numerous barriers that make it challenging for learners and supervisors alike to create or follow up on meaningful goals. Learner-related challenges include uncertainty about how to develop goals within an unpredictable clinical environment and creating goals too narrow or broad in scope. Supervisor-related challenges include difficulties integrating direct observation into the clinical workflow and a desire to avoid negative feedback. The learning environment also presents inherent challenges, such as lack of longitudinal supervisor–learner relationships, time constraints, space limitations, and incentives for learners to conceal their knowledge gaps. The authors discuss these challenges to effective on-shift learning goals and propose solutions that target the learner's approach, the supervisor's approach, and the learning environment itself.

督导人员经常在临床轮班开始时询问急诊科学员的学习目标,但他们可能没有考虑这种做法的原因。认识到提出当班学习目标的根本原因,并积极主动地考虑一些相关挑战的解决方案,可以帮助学员和督导充分发挥这种做法的潜力。目标表述植根于教育原则,如自我调节学习、有针对性的绩效反馈以及学习者与主管之间的合作关系。尽管轮岗学习目标具有增强学习效果的潜力,但仍存在许多障碍,使学习者和督导人员在制定或跟进有意义的目标时面临挑战。与学员相关的挑战包括不确定如何在不可预测的临床环境中制定目标,以及制定的目标范围过窄或过宽。与督导相关的挑战包括难以将直接观察融入临床工作流程,以及希望避免负面反馈。学习环境也带来了固有的挑战,如缺乏纵向的督导-学习者关系、时间限制、空间限制以及鼓励学习者掩盖其知识差距等。作者讨论了有效的轮班学习目标所面临的这些挑战,并提出了针对学习者方法、督导方法和学习环境本身的解决方案。
{"title":"Making goals count: A theory-informed approach to on-shift learning goals","authors":"Max Griffith MD,&nbsp;Ivan Zvonar MD,&nbsp;Alexander Garrett MD,&nbsp;Naeem Bayaa MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10993","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Supervisors often ask emergency medicine trainees for their learning goals at the start of a clinical shift, though they may do so without considering the reasons for this practice. Recognizing the underlying rationale for voicing on-shift learning goals and proactively considering solutions for some of the associated challenges can help learners and supervisors employ this practice to its full potential. Goal articulation is rooted in educational principles such as self-regulated learning, targeted performance feedback, and collaborative relationships between learner and supervisor. Despite the potential for on-shift learning goals to augment learning, there are numerous barriers that make it challenging for learners and supervisors alike to create or follow up on meaningful goals. Learner-related challenges include uncertainty about how to develop goals within an unpredictable clinical environment and creating goals too narrow or broad in scope. Supervisor-related challenges include difficulties integrating direct observation into the clinical workflow and a desire to avoid negative feedback. The learning environment also presents inherent challenges, such as lack of longitudinal supervisor–learner relationships, time constraints, space limitations, and incentives for learners to conceal their knowledge gaps. The authors discuss these challenges to effective on-shift learning goals and propose solutions that target the learner's approach, the supervisor's approach, and the learning environment itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141329371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating medical students into the emergency department during a protracted period of military conflict: Enhancing surge capacity and augmenting education 在长期军事冲突期间将医科学生纳入急诊科:增强快速部署能力并加强教育
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.11006
Joseph Offenbacher MD, Dror Via, Noa Oren, Jacob Assaf MD, Ahmad Nama MD, Evan Avraham Alpert MD
{"title":"Integrating medical students into the emergency department during a protracted period of military conflict: Enhancing surge capacity and augmenting education","authors":"Joseph Offenbacher MD,&nbsp;Dror Via,&nbsp;Noa Oren,&nbsp;Jacob Assaf MD,&nbsp;Ahmad Nama MD,&nbsp;Evan Avraham Alpert MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.11006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.11006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141304269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incorporating implementation science principles into curricular design 将实施科学原则纳入课程设计
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10996
Michael Gottlieb MD, Julie Bobitt PhD, Pavitra Kotini-Shah MD, Shaveta Khosla PhD, MPH, Dennis P. Watson PhD

Implementation science (IS) is an approach focused on increasing the application of evidence-based health interventions into practice, through purposive and thoughtful planning to maximize uptake, scalability, and sustainability. Many of these principles can be readily applied to medical education, to help augment traditional approaches to curriculum design. In this paper, we summarize key components of IS with an emphasis on application to the medical educator.

实施科学(IS)是一种方法,其重点是通过有目的的周到规划,将循证健康干预措施更多地应用到实践中,以最大限度地提高吸收率、可扩展性和可持续性。其中的许多原则可以很容易地应用到医学教育中,帮助增强课程设计的传统方法。在本文中,我们将总结信息系统的主要组成部分,并重点介绍其在医学教育工作者中的应用。
{"title":"Incorporating implementation science principles into curricular design","authors":"Michael Gottlieb MD,&nbsp;Julie Bobitt PhD,&nbsp;Pavitra Kotini-Shah MD,&nbsp;Shaveta Khosla PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Dennis P. Watson PhD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10996","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Implementation science (IS) is an approach focused on increasing the application of evidence-based health interventions into practice, through purposive and thoughtful planning to maximize uptake, scalability, and sustainability. Many of these principles can be readily applied to medical education, to help augment traditional approaches to curriculum design. In this paper, we summarize key components of IS with an emphasis on application to the medical educator.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141156512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FOAM authorship: Who's teaching our learners? FOAM 作者身份:谁在教我们的学生?
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10995
Andrew Grock MD, Tiffany Fan MD, Max Berger MD, Jeffrey Riddell MD

Background

Free open-access medical education (FOAM) is extremely popular among learners and educators despite lacking the traditional peer review process. Despite the potential for inaccurate, low-quality, or biased content, little has been published describing FOAM authors.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 12 months of content from the top 25 blogs in the 2020 Social Media Index from August 2020–2021. We recorded the number of posts per site and descriptive characteristics of authors, including gender affiliation, conflicts of interest (COI) statements, and type of practice (academic, community, or hybrid).

Results

We identified 2141 posts by 1001 authors. More than half were produced by six websites: EM Docs (266), Life in the Fast Lane (232), EMCrit (188), ALiEM (185), Don't Forget the Bubbles (181), and Rebel EM (174). Most content (1680 posts, 78.5%) lacked a COI statement. Authors were mostly academic (89%), mostly held MD degrees (67.4%), and were mostly men (59.7%). Geographically, most FOAM authors reside in the United States (59.5%), Canada (22.42%), or the United Kingdom (9.4%).

Conclusions

Of all the posts in the top 25 sites in 2020, more than half came from six sites, and authors were largely North American men in academics with MD degrees. Learners, content creators, and educators should consider the ways in which a more diverse authorship pool might bring value to the FOAM educational experience.

背景 免费开放医学教育(FOAM)尽管没有传统的同行评审程序,但在学习者和教育者中却非常受欢迎。尽管有可能出现内容不准确、质量低或有偏见的情况,但很少有关于免费开放医学教育作者的文章发表。 方法 我们对 2020 年社交媒体指数排名前 25 位的博客在 2020-2021 年 8 月的 12 个月内容进行了横向分析。我们记录了每个网站的文章数量和作者的描述性特征,包括性别归属、利益冲突 (COI) 声明和实践类型(学术、社区或混合)。 结果 我们确认了 1001 位作者发表的 2141 篇文章。其中一半以上是由六个网站发布的:EM Docs(266 篇)、Life in the Fast Lane(232 篇)、EMCrit(188 篇)、ALiEM(185 篇)、Don't Forget the Bubbles(181 篇)和 Rebel EM(174 篇)。大多数内容(1680 篇,78.5%)缺乏 COI 声明。作者多为学术界人士(89%),大多拥有医学博士学位(67.4%),且多为男性(59.7%)。从地域上看,大多数 FOAM 作者居住在美国(59.5%)、加拿大(22.42%)或英国(9.4%)。 结论 在 2020 年排名前 25 位的所有帖子中,一半以上来自 6 个网站,作者主要是拥有医学博士学位的北美男性学者。学习者、内容创建者和教育者应考虑如何让更多样化的作者库为 FOAM 教育体验带来价值。
{"title":"FOAM authorship: Who's teaching our learners?","authors":"Andrew Grock MD,&nbsp;Tiffany Fan MD,&nbsp;Max Berger MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey Riddell MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10995","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Free open-access medical education (FOAM) is extremely popular among learners and educators despite lacking the traditional peer review process. Despite the potential for inaccurate, low-quality, or biased content, little has been published describing FOAM authors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 12 months of content from the top 25 blogs in the 2020 Social Media Index from August 2020–2021. We recorded the number of posts per site and descriptive characteristics of authors, including gender affiliation, conflicts of interest (COI) statements, and type of practice (academic, community, or hybrid).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We identified 2141 posts by 1001 authors. More than half were produced by six websites: EM Docs (266), Life in the Fast Lane (232), EMCrit (188), ALiEM (185), Don't Forget the Bubbles (181), and Rebel EM (174). Most content (1680 posts, 78.5%) lacked a COI statement. Authors were mostly academic (89%), mostly held MD degrees (67.4%), and were mostly men (59.7%). Geographically, most FOAM authors reside in the United States (59.5%), Canada (22.42%), or the United Kingdom (9.4%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of all the posts in the top 25 sites in 2020, more than half came from six sites, and authors were largely North American men in academics with MD degrees. Learners, content creators, and educators should consider the ways in which a more diverse authorship pool might bring value to the FOAM educational experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10995","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141164806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A national pilot study on simulation-based upstander training for emergency medicine clinicians 针对急诊科临床医生的模拟 "挺身而出 "培训全国试点研究
IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10990
William Mundo MD, MPH, Jordan Vaughn MD, Adetoriola Odetunde MD, Tai Donovan, Al'ai Alvarez MD, Kristyn Smith DO, Cortlyn Brown MD, MCSO, Italo Brown MD, Suchismita Datta MD, Samreen Vora MD, Jacqueline Ward-Gaines MD

Objective

This study assesses the effectiveness of clinical simulation-based training in boosting self-perceived confidence for using upstander communication skills to confront racism, discrimination, and microaggressions (RDM).

Methods

We conducted an observational cohort study with emergency medicine professionals at the 2023 Scientific Assembly of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana. The study featured a clinical simulation-based training on upstander communications skills session followed by small- and large-group debriefs. Participants completed pre- and post-training questionnaires assessing demographics and confidence in health equity competencies. This survey was used in a previous study with emergency medicine residents. Data were analyzed using an independent Student's t-test, with a significance threshold of 0.05.

Results

Thirty-two individuals participated in the simulation-based training, and 24 completed surveys, with a 75% response rate. Most participants were non-Hispanic (24, 85.7%) and women (18, 64%), with racial demographics mostly White (8, 28.6%), Black or African American (8, 28.6%), and Asian (6, 21.4%). After the workshop, there was a notable increase in self-perceived ability and confidence in identifying RDM (from 7 ± 3.2 to 8.6 ± 1.6, p < 0.003), using upstander communication tools (from 6.1 ± 3.5 to 8.5 ± 1, p < 0.0001), and the likelihood of intervening in RDM situations (from 7.1 ± 3.3 to 8.8 ± 1.1, p < 0.0002).

Conclusions

The clinical simulation-based training significantly improved participants' confidence and self-perceived ability to address RDM in simulated clinical environments. This training method is a promising tool for teaching health equity topics in clinical medicine.

目的 本研究评估了基于临床模拟的培训在增强使用旁观者沟通技巧应对种族主义、歧视和微诽谤 (RDM) 的自我认知信心方面的有效性。 方法 我们在路易斯安那州新奥尔良市举行的美国急诊医学学会 2023 年科学大会上对急诊医学专业人员进行了一项观察性队列研究。该研究以临床模拟为基础,对旁观者沟通技巧进行了培训,随后进行了小组和大组汇报。参与者填写了培训前和培训后的问卷,评估人口统计学和对健康公平能力的信心。这项调查曾在之前一项针对急诊科住院医生的研究中使用过。数据分析采用独立的学生 t 检验,显著性阈值为 0.05。 结果 32 人参加了模拟培训,24 人完成了调查,回复率为 75%。大多数参与者为非西班牙裔(24 人,占 85.7%)和女性(18 人,占 64%),种族构成主要为白人(8 人,占 28.6%)、黑人或非裔美国人(8 人,占 28.6%)和亚裔(6 人,占 21.4%)。培训结束后,学员在识别 RDM(从 7 ± 3.2 到 8.6 ± 1.6,p < 0.003)、使用旁观者沟通工具(从 6.1 ± 3.5 到 8.5 ± 1,p < 0.0001)以及干预 RDM 情况的可能性(从 7.1 ± 3.3 到 8.8 ± 1.1,p < 0.0002)方面的自我认知能力和信心都有显著提高。 结论 基于临床模拟的培训极大地提高了参与者在模拟临床环境中处理 RDM 的信心和自我认知能力。这种培训方法是在临床医学中教授健康公平主题的一种很有前途的工具。
{"title":"A national pilot study on simulation-based upstander training for emergency medicine clinicians","authors":"William Mundo MD, MPH,&nbsp;Jordan Vaughn MD,&nbsp;Adetoriola Odetunde MD,&nbsp;Tai Donovan,&nbsp;Al'ai Alvarez MD,&nbsp;Kristyn Smith DO,&nbsp;Cortlyn Brown MD, MCSO,&nbsp;Italo Brown MD,&nbsp;Suchismita Datta MD,&nbsp;Samreen Vora MD,&nbsp;Jacqueline Ward-Gaines MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10990","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10990","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study assesses the effectiveness of clinical simulation-based training in boosting self-perceived confidence for using upstander communication skills to confront racism, discrimination, and microaggressions (RDM).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted an observational cohort study with emergency medicine professionals at the 2023 Scientific Assembly of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana. The study featured a clinical simulation-based training on upstander communications skills session followed by small- and large-group debriefs. Participants completed pre- and post-training questionnaires assessing demographics and confidence in health equity competencies. This survey was used in a previous study with emergency medicine residents. Data were analyzed using an independent Student's <i>t</i>-test, with a significance threshold of 0.05.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-two individuals participated in the simulation-based training, and 24 completed surveys, with a 75% response rate. Most participants were non-Hispanic (24, 85.7%) and women (18, 64%), with racial demographics mostly White (8, 28.6%), Black or African American (8, 28.6%), and Asian (6, 21.4%). After the workshop, there was a notable increase in self-perceived ability and confidence in identifying RDM (from 7 ± 3.2 to 8.6 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.003), using upstander communication tools (from 6.1 ± 3.5 to 8.5 ± 1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and the likelihood of intervening in RDM situations (from 7.1 ± 3.3 to 8.8 ± 1.1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0002).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The clinical simulation-based training significantly improved participants' confidence and self-perceived ability to address RDM in simulated clinical environments. This training method is a promising tool for teaching health equity topics in clinical medicine.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141096396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
AEM Education and Training
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1