Aistė Kučinskienė, Viktorija Šeina, Saulius Vasiliauskas
The article examines the place of two Lithuanian writers, Salomėja Nėris (1909–1947) and Petras Cvirka (1904–1945), in the high school canon of Lithuanian literature in the post-Soviet period. First, the canonisation of these writers in the Soviet Lithuanian school system is analysed, or more precisely, in school curricula and textbooks from that time. Afterwards, we examine the revision of their canonical position after the restoration of Lithuania’s independence (1990). The research applies the socio-cultural methodological approach of canon research. A large sample of sources is used: school curricula, textbooks, readers, press publications, and other contextual materials. The study has revealed the different evaluation of Nėris and Cvirka in post-Soviet schools, which is largely due to differences in writers’ biographies. Since Cvirka consistently held and expressed left-wing and later pro-Soviet views in his work throughout his life, his oeuvre gradually disappeared from the upper school curriculum as the de-sovietisation of Lithuanian culture took place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Nėris, on the contrary, has retained her central position in the school canon in the post-Soviet period. When her last collection of poems was first published in the late 20th century, in the order Nėris’ herself had wanted, it became possible to reposition certain aspects of her life and work.
{"title":"Du sovietinio kanono autoriai posovietinėje Lietuvos mokykloje: Petras Cvirka ir Salomėja Nėris","authors":"Aistė Kučinskienė, Viktorija Šeina, Saulius Vasiliauskas","doi":"10.51554/coll.24.53.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.24.53.05","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the place of two Lithuanian writers, Salomėja Nėris (1909–1947) and Petras Cvirka (1904–1945), in the high school canon of Lithuanian literature in the post-Soviet period. First, the canonisation of these writers in the Soviet Lithuanian school system is analysed, or more precisely, in school curricula and textbooks from that time. Afterwards, we examine the revision of their canonical position after the restoration of Lithuania’s independence (1990). The research applies the socio-cultural methodological approach of canon research. A large sample of sources is used: school curricula, textbooks, readers, press publications, and other contextual materials. The study has revealed the different evaluation of Nėris and Cvirka in post-Soviet schools, which is largely due to differences in writers’ biographies. Since Cvirka consistently held and expressed left-wing and later pro-Soviet views in his work throughout his life, his oeuvre gradually disappeared from the upper school curriculum as the de-sovietisation of Lithuanian culture took place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Nėris, on the contrary, has retained her central position in the school canon in the post-Soviet period. When her last collection of poems was first published in the late 20th century, in the order Nėris’ herself had wanted, it became possible to reposition certain aspects of her life and work. ","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141678801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The main purpose of the article is to outline a panorama of the reception of ‘The Legend of Master Manole’ in Romanian education, from the beginning of its introduction to the Romanian national literary canon until the post-communist era. The paper explores how the discourse created around this text in the 19th century and perpetuated by interwar critics (e.g. George Călinescu, Mircea Eliade), and the ideology of protochronism during Ceaușescu’s regime, is preserved in post-communist textbooks. Although there have been some attempts at the feminist decanonisation of the ballad since 1989, they did not influence the main narrative presented in school manuals. The didactic literature still emphasises the male perspective of Manole, and his sacrifice for the act of creation, ignoring the perspective of Ana, the female character in the ballad, and her sacrifice. Starting from the premise that the canon is a certain set of beliefs which can be constantly engaged in polemics that should be continuously shaped and deconstructed, the article also proposes some new literary contexts in which ‘The Legend of Master Manole’ could appear in school textbooks.
{"title":"The Margins versus the Centre of the National Literary Canon: The Reception of ‘The Legend of Master Manole’ in Romanian Education","authors":"Olga Bartosiewicz-Nikolaev","doi":"10.51554/coll.24.53.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.24.53.06","url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of the article is to outline a panorama of the reception of ‘The Legend of Master Manole’ in Romanian education, from the beginning of its introduction to the Romanian national literary canon until the post-communist era. The paper explores how the discourse created around this text in the 19th century and perpetuated by interwar critics (e.g. George Călinescu, Mircea Eliade), and the ideology of protochronism during Ceaușescu’s regime, is preserved in post-communist textbooks. Although there have been some attempts at the feminist decanonisation of the ballad since 1989, they did not influence the main narrative presented in school manuals. The didactic literature still emphasises the male perspective of Manole, and his sacrifice for the act of creation, ignoring the perspective of Ana, the female character in the ballad, and her sacrifice. Starting from the premise that the canon is a certain set of beliefs which can be constantly engaged in polemics that should be continuously shaped and deconstructed, the article also proposes some new literary contexts in which ‘The Legend of Master Manole’ could appear in school textbooks.","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141680441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mindaugas Balkus, Kaip Kovno tapo Kaunu. Miesto lituanizavimas 1918–1940 m.: monografija: Kaunas, Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2023, 247 p., ISBN 978-609-467-550-8
Mindaugas Balkus，《科夫诺是如何成为考纳斯的》。考纳斯，维陶塔斯-马格努斯大学出版社，2023 年，247 页，ISBN 978-609-467-550-8
{"title":"Kaip „lietuvėjo“ Kaunas","authors":"Aistė Lazauskienė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.14","url":null,"abstract":"Mindaugas Balkus, Kaip Kovno tapo Kaunu. Miesto lituanizavimas 1918–1940 m.: monografija: Kaunas, Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 2023, 247 p., ISBN 978-609-467-550-8","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139600574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Can I Still Accomplish Anything?” Vytautas Kubilius and the Role of Intellectual and Critical Thinking in Nation-Building","authors":"Gintarė Bernotienė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.09","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>-</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140496567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marijus Šidlauskas, Kairiarankio kentauro pėdomis: literatūros kritika, eseistika, pasisakymai. Sudarė Nida Gaidauskienė, Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas, 2023, 427 p., ISBN 978-609-425-360-7
Marijus Šidlauskas, In the Footsteps of the Kairiarankian Centaur: literary criticism, essays, speeches.由 Nida Gaidauskienė 编译，维尔纽斯：立陶宛文学和民俗研究所，2023 年，427 页，ISBN 978-609-425-360-7
{"title":"„Suvokti buvimo savo vienintelėje Žemėje malonę“","authors":"Rita Tūtlytė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.12","url":null,"abstract":"Marijus Šidlauskas, Kairiarankio kentauro pėdomis: literatūros kritika, eseistika, pasisakymai. Sudarė Nida Gaidauskienė, Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas, 2023, 427 p., ISBN 978-609-425-360-7","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139600235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On Vytautas’s Kubilius’s Principle and The Pulse of Criticism","authors":"Neringa Butnoriūtė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.11","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>-</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139599373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vytautas Osvaldas Virkau. Dienoraštis, 1944–1952, sudarytoja Dalia Kuizinienė. Vilnius: Versus, 2023, 264 p., ISBN 978-9955-829-49-2
维陶塔斯-奥斯瓦尔达斯-维尔考。日记，1944-1952 年》，Dalia Kuizinienė 编译。维尔纽斯：Versus, 2023, 264 p., ISBN 978-9955-829-49-2
{"title":"Dienoraštis, papildantis pasitraukimo iš Lietuvos 1944 metais pasakojimus","authors":"Gitana Vanagaitė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.13","url":null,"abstract":"Vytautas Osvaldas Virkau. Dienoraštis, 1944–1952, sudarytoja Dalia Kuizinienė. Vilnius: Versus, 2023, 264 p., ISBN 978-9955-829-49-2","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139601999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article examines the Women’s Literary Evenings organized by the female members of the organization Ateitis and the magazine Naujoji vaidilutė in 1930, 1935 and 1938, using the sources of public discourse, i.e., reviews of those evenings published in daily newspapers and cultural press. The article takes into account the study carried out by other researchers of that time and the controversies surrounding women’s participation in culture during the 1930s. I analyze the process using a sociological approach to literature and methodological tools from Pierre Bourdieu’s theory on the field of cultural production, which treats the group of women as a limited and non-independent group of participants in the literary field. The article explores the transformations that have taken place in Women’s Literary Evenings over time: the development of those events, the changes in the concept, the reactions of participants and organizers to criticism, and its consequences. It also discusses the changes of the concept of women as writers and the possibilities of their initiation as writers during the period in question (eight years).
{"title":"Solidarity of the (Non)Initiates. Women’s Literary Evenings in 1930, 1935 and 1938","authors":"Agnė Cesiulė","doi":"10.51554/coll.23.52.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.23.52.06","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the Women’s Literary Evenings organized by the female members of the organization Ateitis and the magazine Naujoji vaidilutė in 1930, 1935 and 1938, using the sources of public discourse, i.e., reviews of those evenings published in daily newspapers and cultural press. The article takes into account the study carried out by other researchers of that time and the controversies surrounding women’s participation in culture during the 1930s. I analyze the process using a sociological approach to literature and methodological tools from Pierre Bourdieu’s theory on the field of cultural production, which treats the group of women as a limited and non-independent group of participants in the literary field. The article explores the transformations that have taken place in Women’s Literary Evenings over time: the development of those events, the changes in the concept, the reactions of participants and organizers to criticism, and its consequences. It also discusses the changes of the concept of women as writers and the possibilities of their initiation as writers during the period in question (eight years).","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139599317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：