Pub Date : 2021-04-03DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2021.1893957
Jason M. LaBelle, Kelton A. Meyer, R. Sumner
ABSTRACT The Johnson site is a Folsom occupation in Larimer County, Colorado. T. Russell Johnson discovered the site in 1935, which led to excavations by the Colorado Museum of Natural History in 1936 and later work in 1960 by the University of Wyoming. Little is known of the site due to limited reporting of the excavation and the Folsom assemblage. Our examination of the site collections gathered between 1935 and 1936 reveals an assemblage of 96 items, consisting of Folsom points, preforms, and channel flakes, as well as other tools including end scrapers, gravers, bifaces, and flake tools. Technological analysis of the Folsom points and byproducts of hunting-tool production suggests that site occupants fluted and finished points made from preforms of non-local materials, while additional tools and a few points were made from materials locally available in the Front Range foothills. As such, Johnson represents at minimum a hunting-weaponry-replacement locale.
{"title":"Folsom Point Diggings: The Johnson Site in the Foothills of Larimer County, Colorado","authors":"Jason M. LaBelle, Kelton A. Meyer, R. Sumner","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2021.1893957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.1893957","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Johnson site is a Folsom occupation in Larimer County, Colorado. T. Russell Johnson discovered the site in 1935, which led to excavations by the Colorado Museum of Natural History in 1936 and later work in 1960 by the University of Wyoming. Little is known of the site due to limited reporting of the excavation and the Folsom assemblage. Our examination of the site collections gathered between 1935 and 1936 reveals an assemblage of 96 items, consisting of Folsom points, preforms, and channel flakes, as well as other tools including end scrapers, gravers, bifaces, and flake tools. Technological analysis of the Folsom points and byproducts of hunting-tool production suggests that site occupants fluted and finished points made from preforms of non-local materials, while additional tools and a few points were made from materials locally available in the Front Range foothills. As such, Johnson represents at minimum a hunting-weaponry-replacement locale.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2021.1893957","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41382933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-04-03DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2021.1890401
Briggs Buchanan, J. David Kilby, M. Hamilton, Jason M. LaBelle, Kelton A. Meyer, Jacob Holland-Lulewicz, Brian N. Andrews, Brooke M. Morgan, B. Asher, V. Holliday, G. Hodgins, Todd A. Surovell
ABSTRACT Folsom is an early Paleoindian archaeological tradition found in the North American West. Here we report new AMS radiocarbon dates for the Barger Gulch and Lindenmeier sites in Colorado along with unsuccessful dating attempts for Blackwater Draw, the Mitchell Locality, Shifting Sands, and Lipscomb on the Southern Plains. We applied Bayesian modeling using IntCal20 to our updated set of Folsom dates and estimate that the Folsom tradition lasted for a period spanning between 355–510 years at the 68 per cent credible interval or 325–650 years at the 95 per cent credible interval, starting sometime between 12,845–12,770 calendar years ago (cal yr BP) and ending sometime between 12,400–12,255 cal yr BP. Additionally, we model the spans of the start and end boundaries and find that both the adoption and abandonment of Folsom technology occurred over relatively short periods, less than 100 years and likely less than 50 years.
{"title":"Bayesian Revision of the Folsom Age Range Using IntCal20","authors":"Briggs Buchanan, J. David Kilby, M. Hamilton, Jason M. LaBelle, Kelton A. Meyer, Jacob Holland-Lulewicz, Brian N. Andrews, Brooke M. Morgan, B. Asher, V. Holliday, G. Hodgins, Todd A. Surovell","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2021.1890401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.1890401","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Folsom is an early Paleoindian archaeological tradition found in the North American West. Here we report new AMS radiocarbon dates for the Barger Gulch and Lindenmeier sites in Colorado along with unsuccessful dating attempts for Blackwater Draw, the Mitchell Locality, Shifting Sands, and Lipscomb on the Southern Plains. We applied Bayesian modeling using IntCal20 to our updated set of Folsom dates and estimate that the Folsom tradition lasted for a period spanning between 355–510 years at the 68 per cent credible interval or 325–650 years at the 95 per cent credible interval, starting sometime between 12,845–12,770 calendar years ago (cal yr BP) and ending sometime between 12,400–12,255 cal yr BP. Additionally, we model the spans of the start and end boundaries and find that both the adoption and abandonment of Folsom technology occurred over relatively short periods, less than 100 years and likely less than 50 years.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2021.1890401","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49301137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-02DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1848105
Thomas Talbot, Henry T. Wright, Brendan S Nash
ABSTRACT By 16,000 calendar years ago, glacial melt waters from the ice masses in the basins which would hold lakes Erie, Huron, and Michigan had sculpted vast sandy plains with innumerable kettle lakes, gravel hills, and former channels. These provided a mosaic of marshes, open herbaceous vegetation, and patches of forest sustaining a diversity of herbivores. This rich ecosystem was the home of forager groups using different stone tool assemblages at different times. A small assemblage from the Belson site, made entirely on Attica chert from sources 235 km to the southwest, manifests characteristic Clovis techniques of biface reduction and basal preparation. At present it is the northwestern-most such occurrence in the Great Lakes region. If so, it should date about 13,000 calendar years ago. Further research will better characterize the tool industry and directly establish its age and ecological context.
{"title":"The Belson Site: A Paleoindian Campsite on the Outwash Plains of the Central Great Lakes","authors":"Thomas Talbot, Henry T. Wright, Brendan S Nash","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1848105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848105","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT By 16,000 calendar years ago, glacial melt waters from the ice masses in the basins which would hold lakes Erie, Huron, and Michigan had sculpted vast sandy plains with innumerable kettle lakes, gravel hills, and former channels. These provided a mosaic of marshes, open herbaceous vegetation, and patches of forest sustaining a diversity of herbivores. This rich ecosystem was the home of forager groups using different stone tool assemblages at different times. A small assemblage from the Belson site, made entirely on Attica chert from sources 235 km to the southwest, manifests characteristic Clovis techniques of biface reduction and basal preparation. At present it is the northwestern-most such occurrence in the Great Lakes region. If so, it should date about 13,000 calendar years ago. Further research will better characterize the tool industry and directly establish its age and ecological context.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848105","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48618684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-09DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269
T. Jennings, Ashley M. Smallwood, C. Pevny
ABSTRACT Experimental archaeology is a key component of research for reconstructing past human behaviors, and this approach has been a cornerstone for interpreting the earliest archaeological record in the Americas. In this paper, we survey the work of scholars who have used experimental archaeology to investigate the Paleoamerican stone tool record. We focus primarily on research published in the most recent decade. We organize our review according to four prevailing research themes: identifying objects intentionally made or modified by humans, measuring production efficiency, understanding projectile technologies, and reconstructing how tools were used. In each of these sections, we describe research questions and experimental designs and concisely summarize original investigators’ experimental results. Our hope is that this review will be a useful resource and inspire new experimental research.
{"title":"Reviewing the Role of Experimentation in Reconstructing Paleoamerican Lithic Technologies","authors":"T. Jennings, Ashley M. Smallwood, C. Pevny","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Experimental archaeology is a key component of research for reconstructing past human behaviors, and this approach has been a cornerstone for interpreting the earliest archaeological record in the Americas. In this paper, we survey the work of scholars who have used experimental archaeology to investigate the Paleoamerican stone tool record. We focus primarily on research published in the most recent decade. We organize our review according to four prevailing research themes: identifying objects intentionally made or modified by humans, measuring production efficiency, understanding projectile technologies, and reconstructing how tools were used. In each of these sections, we describe research questions and experimental designs and concisely summarize original investigators’ experimental results. Our hope is that this review will be a useful resource and inspire new experimental research.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47763437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-08DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1851500
E. Böeda, R. Gruhn, Á. V. Vialou, C. Aschero, Denis Vialou, Mario Pino, M. Gluchy, Antonio Pérez, M. Ramos
ABSTRACT The recently reported discovery of cultural evidence at Chiquihuite Cave (Zacatecas, Mexico), produced by humans of at least 26,500 calendar years ago, is a major advance in research into early human occupations in the Americas. Thirteen of the 239 lithic artifacts recovered from the SC-C stratigraphic component, dated during and before the Last Glacial Maximum, are illustrated in Ardelean et al. (2020. “Evidence of Human Occupation in Mexico around the Last Glacial Maximum.” Nature 584: 87–92). Although waiting for more detailed technological studies, these types of artifacts have been reported in other sites, primarily in South America. The field evidence from sites predating the Last Glacial Maximum must now be included in all interpretations of the initial settlement of the Americas.
{"title":"The Chiquihuite Cave, a Real Novelty? Observations about the Still-ignored South American Prehistory","authors":"E. Böeda, R. Gruhn, Á. V. Vialou, C. Aschero, Denis Vialou, Mario Pino, M. Gluchy, Antonio Pérez, M. Ramos","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1851500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1851500","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The recently reported discovery of cultural evidence at Chiquihuite Cave (Zacatecas, Mexico), produced by humans of at least 26,500 calendar years ago, is a major advance in research into early human occupations in the Americas. Thirteen of the 239 lithic artifacts recovered from the SC-C stratigraphic component, dated during and before the Last Glacial Maximum, are illustrated in Ardelean et al. (2020. “Evidence of Human Occupation in Mexico around the Last Glacial Maximum.” Nature 584: 87–92). Although waiting for more detailed technological studies, these types of artifacts have been reported in other sites, primarily in South America. The field evidence from sites predating the Last Glacial Maximum must now be included in all interpretations of the initial settlement of the Americas.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1851500","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41675769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-08DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1846884
L. Bement, Richard R. Drass, L. Cummings, Dakota Larrick
ABSTRACT Charred seeds, including those of goosefoot, amaranth, sedge, and possibly nightshade, were recovered from a Late Paleoindian context at the Bull Creek site in the Oklahoma panhandle. The use of these early successional plant resources at Bull Creek furthers our understanding of Paleoindian subsistence practices on the Plains, where preservation of plant remains is historically under-represented or under-reported. Bull Creek establishes an association between Paleoindians, broad-spectrum hunting, and wild-seed exploitation on the southern High Plains by 10,270 cal BP and documents an early phase of human/plant association in the mid latitudes of North America.
摘要：在俄克拉荷马州狭长地带的布尔溪遗址，从古印度晚期的环境中发现了烧焦的种子，包括鹅掌、苋、莎草，可能还有茄。Bull Creek这些早期演替植物资源的使用进一步加深了我们对平原上古印度生存实践的理解，在那里，植物遗骸的保护在历史上被低估或报道不足。Bull Creek通过10270 cal BP在南部高平原建立了古印第安人、广谱狩猎和野生种子开发之间的联系，并记录了北美洲中纬度地区人类/植物联系的早期阶段。
{"title":"Breaking a Preservation Barrier: Recovery of Charred Seeds in a 10,270 Year-Old Hearth on the High Plains of North America","authors":"L. Bement, Richard R. Drass, L. Cummings, Dakota Larrick","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1846884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1846884","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Charred seeds, including those of goosefoot, amaranth, sedge, and possibly nightshade, were recovered from a Late Paleoindian context at the Bull Creek site in the Oklahoma panhandle. The use of these early successional plant resources at Bull Creek furthers our understanding of Paleoindian subsistence practices on the Plains, where preservation of plant remains is historically under-represented or under-reported. Bull Creek establishes an association between Paleoindians, broad-spectrum hunting, and wild-seed exploitation on the southern High Plains by 10,270 cal BP and documents an early phase of human/plant association in the mid latitudes of North America.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1846884","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44429997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-06DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1820171
Angela K. Gore
ABSTRACT This study reports the first results of geochemical sourcing of artifacts recovered from the 13,000-year-old occupation at Moose Creek in central Alaska, an assemblage assigned to the Nenana complex. During raw-material survey in the Nenana valley, we discovered a previously unrecognized source of dacite, and through portable X-ray fluorescence, here we present its geochemistry. Geochemical comparison of this source to artifacts in the Moose Creek assemblage indicates that the site’s Nenana-complex occupants used this raw material to produce both formal and informal tools, including a diagnostic triangular-shaped Chindadn point.
{"title":"Sourcing Dacite from the Nenana Complex Occupation at Moose Creek, Central Alaska","authors":"Angela K. Gore","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1820171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1820171","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study reports the first results of geochemical sourcing of artifacts recovered from the 13,000-year-old occupation at Moose Creek in central Alaska, an assemblage assigned to the Nenana complex. During raw-material survey in the Nenana valley, we discovered a previously unrecognized source of dacite, and through portable X-ray fluorescence, here we present its geochemistry. Geochemical comparison of this source to artifacts in the Moose Creek assemblage indicates that the site’s Nenana-complex occupants used this raw material to produce both formal and informal tools, including a diagnostic triangular-shaped Chindadn point.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1820171","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42505056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-02DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1811457
T. Dillehay, C. Ocampo, Mario Pino
ABSTRACT This comment is a brief response to the opinion statement made by Politis and Prates in this issue of PaleoAmerica. Some of their errors and misunderstandings are corrected. We maintain that the psephites from Monte Verde-I and Chinchihuapi-I are allochthonous and cultural in origin.
{"title":"Brief Rebuttal to Politis and Prates","authors":"T. Dillehay, C. Ocampo, Mario Pino","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1811457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1811457","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This comment is a brief response to the opinion statement made by Politis and Prates in this issue of PaleoAmerica. Some of their errors and misunderstandings are corrected. We maintain that the psephites from Monte Verde-I and Chinchihuapi-I are allochthonous and cultural in origin.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1811457","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49563651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-02DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399
T. Dillehay, Mario Pino, C. Ocampo
ABSTRACT In a review of the early archaeology of South America, Politis and Prates challenge certain data presented for some early sites. In the process, they misrepresent information presented by original investigators, including us for the Monte Verde and Chinchihuapi sites in Chile. We respond to their critique and correct several errors made by these authors.
{"title":"Comments on Archaeological Remains at the Monte Verde Site Complex, Chile","authors":"T. Dillehay, Mario Pino, C. Ocampo","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a review of the early archaeology of South America, Politis and Prates challenge certain data presented for some early sites. In the process, they misrepresent information presented by original investigators, including us for the Monte Verde and Chinchihuapi sites in Chile. We respond to their critique and correct several errors made by these authors.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44904544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-02DOI: 10.1080/20555563.2020.1792056
G. Politis, Luciano Prates
ABSTRACT This article is a response to Dillehay [2019. “Un ensayo sobre genética, arqueología y movilidad humana temprana.” Mundo de Antes 13 (2): 13–65] and Dillehay, Pino, and Ocampo [2020. “Comments on Archaeological Remains at the Monte Verde Site Complex, Chile.” PaleoAmerica. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399], who criticized our comments about Monte Verde-I and Chinchihuapi-I as well as our suggestion of the tightening of the age of Monte Verde-II [Politis, G. G., and L. Prates. 2018. “Clocking the Arrival of Homo sapiens in the Southern Cone of South America.” In New Perspectives on the Peopling of the Americas, edited by K. Harvati, G. Jäger, and H. Reyes Centeno, 79–106. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag]. They claimed that we purposefully ignored pertinent data to support our opinions, and that we made several mistakes when analyzing the evidence. In this article we demonstrate that we did not ignore any relevant data, and that the putative errors are in fact alternative interpretations based on the available data and recent studies about site formation processes.
本文是对Dillehay[2019]的回应。“unensayo sobre gensamtica, arqueología y movilidad humana temprana。”[2]张晓明，张晓明，张晓明，等。中国农业科学[j] .中国农业科学，2013(2):13 - 65。“对智利蒙特佛得角遗址建筑群考古遗迹的评论”。PaleoAmerica。https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399]，他们批评了我们对Monte Verde-I和chinchihuapi的评论，以及我们建议收紧Monte Verde-II的年龄[Politis, G. G. and L. Prates. 2018]。“记录智人到达南美洲南锥体的时间。”《美洲人的新视角》，K. harati, G. Jäger和H. Reyes Centeno编辑，第79-106页。tbingen: Kerns Verlag。他们声称我们故意忽略相关数据来支持我们的观点，并且我们在分析证据时犯了几个错误。在这篇文章中，我们证明了我们没有忽略任何相关数据，并且假设的错误实际上是基于现有数据和最近关于遗址形成过程的研究的替代解释。
{"title":"Some Opinions about Monte Verde: Response to Dillehay (2019) and Dillehay, Pino, and Ocampo (2020)","authors":"G. Politis, Luciano Prates","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2020.1792056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1792056","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is a response to Dillehay [2019. “Un ensayo sobre genética, arqueología y movilidad humana temprana.” Mundo de Antes 13 (2): 13–65] and Dillehay, Pino, and Ocampo [2020. “Comments on Archaeological Remains at the Monte Verde Site Complex, Chile.” PaleoAmerica. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1762399], who criticized our comments about Monte Verde-I and Chinchihuapi-I as well as our suggestion of the tightening of the age of Monte Verde-II [Politis, G. G., and L. Prates. 2018. “Clocking the Arrival of Homo sapiens in the Southern Cone of South America.” In New Perspectives on the Peopling of the Americas, edited by K. Harvati, G. Jäger, and H. Reyes Centeno, 79–106. Tübingen: Kerns Verlag]. They claimed that we purposefully ignored pertinent data to support our opinions, and that we made several mistakes when analyzing the evidence. In this article we demonstrate that we did not ignore any relevant data, and that the putative errors are in fact alternative interpretations based on the available data and recent studies about site formation processes.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20555563.2020.1792056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47268055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：