Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16322125797720
Zahra Nasreen
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tenants and operators in marginal housing forms: a reply to ‘COVID-19 and precarious housing: paying guest accommodation in a metropolitan Indian city’ by Marella et al","authors":"Zahra Nasreen","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16322125797720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16322125797720","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p> </jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90744212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16329024386613
Helle Rydstrøm
This article explores crisis as social dynamics spurred by events that not only disrupt the normal order of things, but also transmute into crisis processes that generate persisting hardship and problems of the ordinary. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in the industrial zones of Northern Vietnam, the article highlights the ways in which women workers manage crisis as an underlying condition of daily life. Capturing the heterogeneity and volatility of crisis means to unravel the modalities, intensities and temporalities by which a specific crisis is composed, and to identify how it interlocks with socio-economic crisis antecedents, such as gender and class. While crisis takes different shapes and undergoes various phases, a crisis tends to entangle itself with already-existing crises, fuelling or even exacerbating those, while fostering crises entanglements that impose difficulties and harm upon lifeworlds. The differentiated ways in which particular social groups can mitigate crisis challenges and build social resilience depend on ‘horizons of coping’, which inform the scales and impacts of crises entanglements. Thus, crisis studies direct our attention towards human precariousness and societal inequalities, as well as the ways in which crises entanglements are counteracted, closed, navigated or endured in specific ethnographic contexts.
{"title":"The ‘hardship’ of ordinary crises: gendered precariousness and horizons of coping in Vietnam’s industrial zones","authors":"Helle Rydstrøm","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16329024386613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16329024386613","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores crisis as social dynamics spurred by events that not only disrupt the normal order of things, but also transmute into crisis processes that generate persisting hardship and problems of the ordinary. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in the industrial zones of Northern Vietnam, the article highlights the ways in which women workers manage crisis as an underlying condition of daily life. Capturing the heterogeneity and volatility of crisis means to unravel the modalities, intensities and temporalities by which a specific crisis is composed, and to identify how it interlocks with socio-economic crisis antecedents, such as gender and class. While crisis takes different shapes and undergoes various phases, a crisis tends to entangle itself with already-existing crises, fuelling or even exacerbating those, while fostering crises entanglements that impose difficulties and harm upon lifeworlds. The differentiated ways in which particular social groups can mitigate crisis challenges and build social resilience depend on ‘horizons of coping’, which inform the scales and impacts of crises entanglements. Thus, crisis studies direct our attention towards human precariousness and societal inequalities, as well as the ways in which crises entanglements are counteracted, closed, navigated or endured in specific ethnographic contexts.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79161381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16310438058375
R. Recio
{"title":"Foregrounding livelihood and mobility in the struggle for pro-poor urban housing: a reply to ‘Housing temporalities’ by Lall","authors":"R. Recio","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16310438058375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16310438058375","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p> </jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74330907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16349703862780
Ellen Gruenbaum, S. A. Ahmed
Male and female genital cutting are often similar social and moral undertakings in those societies where both are practised. Yet, they both vary widely in meanings and ritual practices in their many social contexts, and there are many societies where only males are circumcised or where neither gender is. Modifications to genitalia range widely in their risks of harm, which has recently begun to be seriously examined for males but that has been well known for females. In this article, we compare female and male genital cutting practices in Sudan, including questions about culture and religion, gender equality, health, rights and laws, and strategies for change to end female genital cutting. In contrast to Shweder’s view that both male and female genital circumcisions might be tolerated by the logic of cultural relativism and logical consistency, which serves to defend the practices of the Islamic sect known as the Dawoodi Bohra in their home country (India) and in the diaspora, we argue that it is important, and useful, to separate the issues of male and female genital cutting in the situation of predominantly Muslim Sudan. Since male genital cutting is well defended in Sudanese Islamic opinion, and since efforts to end the very serious female cutting – predominantly Type 3 – are advancing, we find Shweder’s ‘goose and gander’ moral equivalency argument unhelpful.Key messagesSudanese female genital mutilation or cutting is far more severe than the Dawoodi Bohra female circumcision cases discussed in Shweder’s article and should be ended urgently.Social norms and cultural and religious justifications for female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan are weakening.The goal must be to end female genital mutilation or cutting completely, rather than to modify it to a lesser ‘sunna’ type, because the slippery labelling could end up preserving and reinforcing damaging practices.Sudanese male circumcision is no more severe than in other countries and remains strongly supported ideologically, making it unlikely to be challenged soon.Reformers are justified in pursuing urgent action against all forms of the female practice, while incongruence with policies on the male practice is acceptable for Sudan at this time.
{"title":"Thoughtful comparisons: how do genital cutting traditions change in Sudan? A reply to ‘The prosecution of Dawoodi Bohra women’ by Richard Shweder","authors":"Ellen Gruenbaum, S. A. Ahmed","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16349703862780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16349703862780","url":null,"abstract":"Male and female genital cutting are often similar social and moral undertakings in those societies where both are practised. Yet, they both vary widely in meanings and ritual practices in their many social contexts, and there are many societies where only males are circumcised or where neither gender is. Modifications to genitalia range widely in their risks of harm, which has recently begun to be seriously examined for males but that has been well known for females. In this article, we compare female and male genital cutting practices in Sudan, including questions about culture and religion, gender equality, health, rights and laws, and strategies for change to end female genital cutting. In contrast to Shweder’s view that both male and female genital circumcisions might be tolerated by the logic of cultural relativism and logical consistency, which serves to defend the practices of the Islamic sect known as the Dawoodi Bohra in their home country (India) and in the diaspora, we argue that it is important, and useful, to separate the issues of male and female genital cutting in the situation of predominantly Muslim Sudan. Since male genital cutting is well defended in Sudanese Islamic opinion, and since efforts to end the very serious female cutting – predominantly Type 3 – are advancing, we find Shweder’s ‘goose and gander’ moral equivalency argument unhelpful.Key messagesSudanese female genital mutilation or cutting is far more severe than the Dawoodi Bohra female circumcision cases discussed in Shweder’s article and should be ended urgently.Social norms and cultural and religious justifications for female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan are weakening.The goal must be to end female genital mutilation or cutting completely, rather than to modify it to a lesser ‘sunna’ type, because the slippery labelling could end up preserving and reinforcing damaging practices.Sudanese male circumcision is no more severe than in other countries and remains strongly supported ideologically, making it unlikely to be challenged soon.Reformers are justified in pursuing urgent action against all forms of the female practice, while incongruence with policies on the male practice is acceptable for Sudan at this time.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86980606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16421973649174
Ov Cristian Norocel
{"title":"The conceptual imbrications of men, masculinities and crises - a reply to ‘The place and potential of crisis/crises in critical studies on men and masculinities’ by Jeff Hearn","authors":"Ov Cristian Norocel","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16421973649174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16421973649174","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p> </jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76831163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16261939486586
Seth B. Rozin
Inspired by Richard Shweder’s paper, What about ‘Female Genital Mutilation?’ And Why Understanding Culture Matters in the First Place (MIT Press, 2000), I wrote the play Human Rites seeking to challenge audiences’ assumptions about the practice of circumcision among women, known colloquially as ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM). Throughout the development of Human Rites, which involved research and extensive interaction with Shweder and Fuambai Sia Ahmadu (both of whom served as bases for characters in the play), I experienced anticipated and unanticipated pushback on the controversial perspectives voiced in the play, as well as the appropriateness of a Caucasian man authoring a play about black and brown women’s bodies. The two productions of Human Rites went on to generate highly engaged dialogue among audiences, as they grappled with their own, mostly unexamined pre-conceptions about FGM, the disparity in moral attitudes toward male and female circumcision, and the inherent moral authority Westerners often hold with regard to ‘primitive’ practices in other countries and cultures. Shweder’s subsequent paper ‘The prosecution of Dawoodi Bohra women: some reasonable doubts,’ has inspired a kind of sequel to Human Rites, that will interrogate the widely accepted practice of circumcision among infant boys in Western Jewish and Christian communities.
{"title":"A dramatic interpretation of the fragilities of the FGM narrative: a reply to ‘The prosecution of Dawoodi Bohra women’ by Richard Shweder","authors":"Seth B. Rozin","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16261939486586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16261939486586","url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by Richard Shweder’s paper, What about ‘Female Genital Mutilation?’ And Why Understanding Culture Matters in the First Place (MIT Press, 2000), I wrote the play Human Rites seeking to challenge audiences’ assumptions about the practice of circumcision among women, known colloquially as ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM). Throughout the development of Human Rites, which involved research and extensive interaction with Shweder and Fuambai Sia Ahmadu (both of whom served as bases for characters in the play), I experienced anticipated and unanticipated pushback on the controversial perspectives voiced in the play, as well as the appropriateness of a Caucasian man authoring a play about black and brown women’s bodies. The two productions of Human Rites went on to generate highly engaged dialogue among audiences, as they grappled with their own, mostly unexamined pre-conceptions about FGM, the disparity in moral attitudes toward male and female circumcision, and the inherent moral authority Westerners often hold with regard to ‘primitive’ practices in other countries and cultures. Shweder’s subsequent paper ‘The prosecution of Dawoodi Bohra women: some reasonable doubts,’ has inspired a kind of sequel to Human Rites, that will interrogate the widely accepted practice of circumcision among infant boys in Western Jewish and Christian communities.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81227295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16337538509293
Kelly Greenop, Johanna Brugman Alvarez
{"title":"Editorial: precarious housing, health and well-being across diverse global settings","authors":"Kelly Greenop, Johanna Brugman Alvarez","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16337538509293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16337538509293","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p> </jats:p>","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88670063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16330096286109
F. Andersson
Macroeconomic crises are common as well as economically, socially and politically costly. Fiscal policy plays an important role in alleviating the costs of the crisis. However, recent experiences suggest that the public finances are often unprepared for a crisis. Deficits and debt levels prior to the crisis are commonly too high, limiting the government’s ability to support the economy through the crisis and the recovery phase. In this article, I argue that theoretical macroeconomic models’ underlying assumption of a stable long-run equilibrium may partially explain why governments fail to prepare the public finances for a future crisis. In the standard equilibrium models, crises are seen as one-off events caused by external factors, which creates a false impression of long-run economic stability. The models thus indirectly indicate that there is no need to prepare for a potential crisis. Using forecast data, I demonstrate how the equilibrium perspective dominates macroeconomic thinking and how it contributes to toohigh debt ratios prior to a crisis. I end the article by discussing how to design fiscal policy rules based on a crisis rather than an equilibrium perspective.Key messagesPublic finances are commonly unprepared for dealing with an economic crisis.This is partially explained by the economic models’ assumption of a stable long-run equilibrium.Incorporating a crisis perspective in the design of fiscal policy rules would improve welfare.
{"title":"Macroeconomic equilibriums, crises and fiscal policy","authors":"F. Andersson","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16330096286109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16330096286109","url":null,"abstract":"Macroeconomic crises are common as well as economically, socially and politically costly. Fiscal policy plays an important role in alleviating the costs of the crisis. However, recent experiences suggest that the public finances are often unprepared for a crisis. Deficits and debt levels prior to the crisis are commonly too high, limiting the government’s ability to support the economy through the crisis and the recovery phase. In this article, I argue that theoretical macroeconomic models’ underlying assumption of a stable long-run equilibrium may partially explain why governments fail to prepare the public finances for a future crisis. In the standard equilibrium models, crises are seen as one-off events caused by external factors, which creates a false impression of long-run economic stability. The models thus indirectly indicate that there is no need to prepare for a potential crisis. Using forecast data, I demonstrate how the equilibrium perspective dominates macroeconomic thinking and how it contributes to toohigh debt ratios prior to a crisis. I end the article by discussing how to design fiscal policy rules based on a crisis rather than an equilibrium perspective.Key messagesPublic finances are commonly unprepared for dealing with an economic crisis.This is partially explained by the economic models’ assumption of a stable long-run equilibrium.Incorporating a crisis perspective in the design of fiscal policy rules would improve welfare.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78634366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16348228772103
S. Walby
The theory of crisis and society is advanced by developing a complex systems analysis and is applied to the COVID-19 pandemic. Five issues are identified, discussed and resolved: the definition of crisis; whether a crisis is treated as real or as a socially constructed narrative, or both; the underlying concept and theory of society and its alternative forms; and the different kinds of change in relationship between crisis and society (recuperation, intensification, transformation and catastrophe). This complex systems approach to crisis is applied to the COVID-19 pandemic, analysing the cascade of the crisis through institutional domains and the consequent changes to multiple regimes of inequality.
{"title":"Crisis and society: developing the theory of crisis in the context of COVID-19","authors":"S. Walby","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16348228772103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16348228772103","url":null,"abstract":"The theory of crisis and society is advanced by developing a complex systems analysis and is applied to the COVID-19 pandemic. Five issues are identified, discussed and resolved: the definition of crisis; whether a crisis is treated as real or as a socially constructed narrative, or both; the underlying concept and theory of society and its alternative forms; and the different kinds of change in relationship between crisis and society (recuperation, intensification, transformation and catastrophe). This complex systems approach to crisis is applied to the COVID-19 pandemic, analysing the cascade of the crisis through institutional domains and the consequent changes to multiple regimes of inequality.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77963248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1332/204378921x16324313888043
Ruchika Lall
In the Global South, urban space is appropriated through diverse informal housing arrangements, with characteristic inherent and relational temporalities. While these forms of housing often consolidate through incremental growth, change in materials and perceived security, they also exist precariously through changing circumstances. While some urban scholars have discussed the characteristic in-betweenness of informality, others have noted the conceptual tension that policy holds in addressing this temporality. This article builds on these discussions to argue that the temporality within and across diverse informal housing arrangements matters not due to the ways in which it manifests, but due to what happens within it as a space of transformation, that is, of socio-economic and political mobility. It draws from literature across disciplines on mobilities, poverty and capabilities to posit that a conceptual frame of choice and agency is key to policy engagement with housing temporalities. The article locates this discussion in the city of Delhi, where cycles of evictions have broken large ‘slum’ clusters, or bastis, into further spatial and temporal configurations. The article uses two distinct housing models to illustrate narratives of the state across two sites: Savda Ghevra, a case of peripheral resettlement; and Kathputli Colony, a case of in-situ redevelopment. It reveals how the state not only does not recognise the temporality of self-made housing practices, but also sets into motion temporalities that, through the absence of choice and agency, create conditions for precarity, highlighting the need to keep choice and agency central to discourses on housing and well-being.Key messagesInformal housing arrangements in the Global South have inherent and relational temporalities.The temporality within and across housing arrangements holds within it a space of transformation.A conceptual frame of choice and agency is key to policy engagement with housing temporalities.The state often does not recognise the temporality of self-made housing, but rather sets into motion housing temporalities.An absence of choice and agency in housing discourses creates conditions for precarity.
{"title":"Housing temporalities: state narratives and precarity in the Global South","authors":"Ruchika Lall","doi":"10.1332/204378921x16324313888043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921x16324313888043","url":null,"abstract":"In the Global South, urban space is appropriated through diverse informal housing arrangements, with characteristic inherent and relational temporalities. While these forms of housing often consolidate through incremental growth, change in materials and perceived security, they also exist precariously through changing circumstances. While some urban scholars have discussed the characteristic in-betweenness of informality, others have noted the conceptual tension that policy holds in addressing this temporality. This article builds on these discussions to argue that the temporality within and across diverse informal housing arrangements matters not due to the ways in which it manifests, but due to what happens within it as a space of transformation, that is, of socio-economic and political mobility. It draws from literature across disciplines on mobilities, poverty and capabilities to posit that a conceptual frame of choice and agency is key to policy engagement with housing temporalities. The article locates this discussion in the city of Delhi, where cycles of evictions have broken large ‘slum’ clusters, or bastis, into further spatial and temporal configurations. The article uses two distinct housing models to illustrate narratives of the state across two sites: Savda Ghevra, a case of peripheral resettlement; and Kathputli Colony, a case of in-situ redevelopment. It reveals how the state not only does not recognise the temporality of self-made housing practices, but also sets into motion temporalities that, through the absence of choice and agency, create conditions for precarity, highlighting the need to keep choice and agency central to discourses on housing and well-being.Key messagesInformal housing arrangements in the Global South have inherent and relational temporalities.The temporality within and across housing arrangements holds within it a space of transformation.A conceptual frame of choice and agency is key to policy engagement with housing temporalities.The state often does not recognise the temporality of self-made housing, but rather sets into motion housing temporalities.An absence of choice and agency in housing discourses creates conditions for precarity.","PeriodicalId":37814,"journal":{"name":"Global Discourse","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81871002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：