首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cancer Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Australia’s cancer crossroads: Prevention, innovation, and equity as policy imperatives 澳大利亚的癌症十字路口:预防、创新和公平政策势在必行
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100654
Rashidul Alam Mahumud
Cancer in Australia represents a paradox: survival outcomes are among the best globally, yet incidence remains high, inequities persist, and costs are rising. In 2025, ∼170,000 new cases are projected nationally, with age-standardised mortality estimated at ∼194 deaths per 100,000, declining over three decades yet still representing a substantial absolute burden. The most common diagnosed cancers, breast, prostate, colorectal, melanoma, and lung, reflect both demographic ageing and improved detection, as well as preventable risk factors and structural gaps in early detection and care. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of death, underscoring the importance of Australia’s National Lung Cancer Screening Program, which commenced on 1 July 2025 to provide targeted low-dose CT screening for high-risk populations. We argue that Australia’s cancer system is at a crossroads: policy must strengthen prevention, embed equity, and sustain innovation simultaneously. Priorities include scaling effective prevention, ensuring equitable participation in population and targeted screening (including the new lung program), improving timely diagnostic pathways, expanding fair access to evidence-based therapies, and investing in survivorship and supportive care. Without explicit equity safeguards and value-based principles, rising incidence and high-cost therapies risk undermining sustainability. The Australian experience offers important lessons for other high-income countries balancing progress with equity in cancer control. We emphasise data-driven improvement, including the public reporting of stage, diagnostic timeliness, treatment, outcomes, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs stratified by geography, socioeconomic status, and Indigenous status, to reduce unwarranted variation and improve health equity; forthcoming programs (e.g., lung screening; risk-stratified melanoma) should be designed for equity from inception. Although survival has improved, high incidence, driven by population ageing, detection practices, and modifiable risks, persists; inequities and rising costs also persist. Outcomes and equity are tightly linked to early detection, through screening and timely diagnostic pathways for symptomatic patients, because delays in time-to-diagnosis drive avoidable advanced-stage presentation and poorer survival. Screening participation remains suboptimal and inequitable; in breast cancer, incomplete capture of privately obtained mammography outside BreastScreen can obscure true participation among higher-income groups. Addressing prevention, diagnostic timeliness, and unwarranted variation is essential to improve outcomes, equity, and value. Australia’s rising cancer burden reflects demographic ageing and detection practices, compounded by preventable risk factors and inequities in timely diagnosis and care; policy responses should integrate prevention with diagnostic timeliness, equitable access, and value-based investment.
澳大利亚的癌症代表了一个悖论:生存结果是全球最好的,但发病率仍然很高,不平等现象持续存在,成本不断上升。到2025年,预计全国将出现约170,000例新病例,年龄标准化死亡率估计为每100,000例约194例死亡,在三十年中下降,但仍然是一个巨大的绝对负担。最常见的诊断癌症,即乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌、黑色素瘤和肺癌,反映了人口老龄化和检测的改善,以及可预防的风险因素和早期检测和护理方面的结构性差距。肺癌仍然是导致死亡的主要原因,这凸显了澳大利亚国家肺癌筛查方案的重要性,该方案于2025年7月1日启动,为高危人群提供有针对性的低剂量CT筛查。我们认为,澳大利亚的癌症系统正处于十字路口:政策必须同时加强预防、嵌入公平和保持创新。优先事项包括扩大有效预防规模,确保人群公平参与和有针对性的筛查(包括新的肺部项目),改善及时诊断途径,扩大公平获得循证治疗的机会,以及投资于幸存者和支持性护理。如果没有明确的公平保障和基于价值的原则,发病率上升和高成本疗法可能会破坏可持续性。澳大利亚的经验为其他高收入国家在癌症控制方面平衡进步与公平提供了重要的教训。我们强调数据驱动的改进,包括公开报告阶段、诊断及时性、治疗、结果和按地理、社会经济地位和土著地位分层的自付费用(OOP),以减少不必要的差异并改善卫生公平;即将开展的项目(如肺部筛查、风险分层黑色素瘤)从一开始就应考虑公平性。尽管生存率有所提高,但由于人口老龄化、检测方法和可改变的风险,高发病率仍然存在;不平等和成本上升也依然存在。结果和公平与通过筛查和及时诊断途径对有症状患者进行早期发现密切相关,因为诊断时间的延误会导致本可避免的晚期症状和较差的生存期。筛查参与仍然是次优和不公平的;在乳腺癌方面,在乳房筛查之外不完全获取私人获得的乳房x光检查可能会模糊高收入群体的真实参与情况。解决预防、诊断及时性和不必要的变化问题对于改善结果、公平性和价值至关重要。澳大利亚不断上升的癌症负担反映了人口老龄化和检测实践,加上可预防的风险因素和及时诊断和护理方面的不平等;政策应对应将预防与诊断及时性、公平获取和基于价值的投资结合起来。
{"title":"Australia’s cancer crossroads: Prevention, innovation, and equity as policy imperatives","authors":"Rashidul Alam Mahumud","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100654","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100654","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cancer in Australia represents a paradox: survival outcomes are among the best globally, yet incidence remains high, inequities persist, and costs are rising. In 2025, ∼170,000 new cases are projected nationally, with age-standardised mortality estimated at ∼194 deaths per 100,000, declining over three decades yet still representing a substantial absolute burden. The most common diagnosed cancers, breast, prostate, colorectal, melanoma, and lung, reflect both demographic ageing and improved detection, as well as preventable risk factors and structural gaps in early detection and care. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of death, underscoring the importance of Australia’s National Lung Cancer Screening Program, which commenced on 1 July 2025 to provide targeted low-dose CT screening for high-risk populations. We argue that Australia’s cancer system is at a crossroads: policy must strengthen prevention, embed equity, and sustain innovation simultaneously. Priorities include scaling effective prevention, ensuring equitable participation in population and targeted screening (including the new lung program), improving timely diagnostic pathways, expanding fair access to evidence-based therapies, and investing in survivorship and supportive care. Without explicit equity safeguards and value-based principles, rising incidence and high-cost therapies risk undermining sustainability. The Australian experience offers important lessons for other high-income countries balancing progress with equity in cancer control. We emphasise data-driven improvement, including the public reporting of stage, diagnostic timeliness, treatment, outcomes, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs stratified by geography, socioeconomic status, and Indigenous status, to reduce unwarranted variation and improve health equity; forthcoming programs (e.g., lung screening; risk-stratified melanoma) should be designed for equity from inception. Although survival has improved, high incidence, driven by population ageing, detection practices, and modifiable risks, persists; inequities and rising costs also persist. Outcomes and equity are tightly linked to early detection, through screening and timely diagnostic pathways for symptomatic patients, because delays in time-to-diagnosis drive avoidable advanced-stage presentation and poorer survival. Screening participation remains suboptimal and inequitable; in breast cancer, incomplete capture of privately obtained mammography outside BreastScreen can obscure true participation among higher-income groups. Addressing prevention, diagnostic timeliness, and unwarranted variation is essential to improve outcomes, equity, and value. Australia’s rising cancer burden reflects demographic ageing and detection practices, compounded by preventable risk factors and inequities in timely diagnosis and care; policy responses should integrate prevention with diagnostic timeliness, equitable access, and value-based investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145362778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lessons learned from the support of the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Agency for Research on Cancer and World Health Organization to develop National Cancer Control Plans in low- and middle-income countries. 国际原子能机构、国际癌症研究机构和世界卫生组织支持中低收入国家制定国家癌症控制计划的经验教训。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100652
Lisa Montel, John Russell, Issimouha Dille Mahamadou, Mary Nyangasi, Sharon Katai Kapambwe, Alfred Karagu Maina, Valerian Mwenda, Andre Carvalho, Geraldine Arias de Göbl, Marianna Nobile, Yannick Romero, Mauricio Maza, Lisa M Stevens

Background: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) assist countries in building and strengthening their cancer control capacity. This support includes guidance to Member States to set priorities for national cancer control through the development and implementation of National Cancer Control Plans (NCCPs). Our aim was to identify the lessons learned from the support United Nations (UN) agencies provide to develop NCCPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to support the development of guidance.

Methods: We developed a questionnaire based on a review of the NCCP literature and conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 Member States that received UN agency support between 2020 and 2023 and five IAEA Programme Officers who coordinated UN support. We coded the transcripts inductively and performed a thematic analysis of the data.

Results: Three main themes were identified, each with their own barriers and enablers to develop NCCPs: coordination of NCCP development; method; and governance. We discuss each of these challenges and offer recommendations for Member States and UN agencies to further improve the development process of national cancer control strategies. We selected Kenya as a case study to show an example of good practice.

Conclusion: This paper complements a sister study conducted by the International Cancer Control Partnership which assessed challenges of developing NCCPs for countries that received a different type of support. Both studies contribute to the growing body of NCCP literature following the 2025 global review of NCCPs.

Policy summary: The lessons learned from the IAEA-IARC-WHO support to develop NCCPs will inform policies, programmes and practices in cancer control planning and implementation in LMICs, as well as the development of a common methodology for UN agencies to provide NCCP support.

背景:国际原子能机构(原子能机构)、国际癌症研究机构(癌症研究机构)和世界卫生组织(卫生组织)协助各国建立和加强其癌症控制能力。这种支持包括指导会员国通过制定和实施国家癌症控制计划来确定国家癌症控制的优先事项。我们的目的是确定从联合国机构为中低收入国家制定国家核心方案提供的支持中吸取的经验教训,以支持指南的制定。方法:我们在回顾NCCP文献的基础上编制了一份问卷,并对11个在2020年至2023年期间接受联合国机构支持的成员国和5名协调联合国支持的原子能机构项目官员进行了半结构化访谈。我们对转录本进行了归纳编码,并对数据进行了专题分析。结果:确定了三个主要主题,每个主题都有各自的障碍和推动因素来制定国家重点控制方案:国家重点控制方案发展的协调;方法;和治理。我们讨论了每一项挑战,并为会员国和联合国机构提出建议,以进一步改善国家癌症控制战略的制定进程。我们选择肯尼亚作为案例研究,以展示良好实践的例子。结论:本文对国际癌症控制伙伴关系开展的一项姊妹研究进行了补充,该研究评估了获得不同类型支持的国家发展非核心控制方案的挑战。在2025年全球NCCP回顾之后,这两项研究都为NCCP文献的增长做出了贡献。政策摘要:从国际原子能机构-国际癌症研究机构-世卫组织支持制定国家重点控制项目中吸取的经验教训将为中低收入国家癌症控制规划和实施方面的政策、规划和做法提供参考,并为联合国机构提供国家重点控制项目支持制定共同方法。
{"title":"Lessons learned from the support of the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Agency for Research on Cancer and World Health Organization to develop National Cancer Control Plans in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Lisa Montel, John Russell, Issimouha Dille Mahamadou, Mary Nyangasi, Sharon Katai Kapambwe, Alfred Karagu Maina, Valerian Mwenda, Andre Carvalho, Geraldine Arias de Göbl, Marianna Nobile, Yannick Romero, Mauricio Maza, Lisa M Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100652","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) assist countries in building and strengthening their cancer control capacity. This support includes guidance to Member States to set priorities for national cancer control through the development and implementation of National Cancer Control Plans (NCCPs). Our aim was to identify the lessons learned from the support United Nations (UN) agencies provide to develop NCCPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to support the development of guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a questionnaire based on a review of the NCCP literature and conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 Member States that received UN agency support between 2020 and 2023 and five IAEA Programme Officers who coordinated UN support. We coded the transcripts inductively and performed a thematic analysis of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes were identified, each with their own barriers and enablers to develop NCCPs: coordination of NCCP development; method; and governance. We discuss each of these challenges and offer recommendations for Member States and UN agencies to further improve the development process of national cancer control strategies. We selected Kenya as a case study to show an example of good practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper complements a sister study conducted by the International Cancer Control Partnership which assessed challenges of developing NCCPs for countries that received a different type of support. Both studies contribute to the growing body of NCCP literature following the 2025 global review of NCCPs.</p><p><strong>Policy summary: </strong>The lessons learned from the IAEA-IARC-WHO support to develop NCCPs will inform policies, programmes and practices in cancer control planning and implementation in LMICs, as well as the development of a common methodology for UN agencies to provide NCCP support.</p>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":" ","pages":"100652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overlooked and underreported: A systematic review of quality of life in recent Phase III metastatic breast cancer trials 被忽视和少报:最近III期转移性乳腺癌试验中生活质量的系统评价。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100653
Shreyas Kalantri , Chiranjeevi Sainatham , Jayanth Reddy Tallapalli , Pranali Pachika , Blake Kelley , Ranadheer Reddy Dande , Greeshma Gaddipati , Zhanxu Liu , Maiying Kong , Brian Dong , Elizabeth Riley

Background

In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), where treatment is non-curative, patient quality of life (QoL) is a critical consideration alongside traditional survival outcomes. Despite increasing recognition by regulatory bodies, the extent of QoL incorporation into contemporary Phase III trials remains unclear.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of Phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for MBC published between 2019 and 2023, using the PubMed database. Trials were categorized based on receptor subtype (HR+, HER2 +, TNBC), trial design (superiority vs. non-inferiority), study outcome (positive vs. negative), and journal impact factor. The primary outcome was the incorporation of QoL outcomes in published results.

Results

Among 122 eligible trials, only 36.9 % included QoL measures. Subgroup analysis revealed higher QoL incorporation in hormone receptor-positive trials compared to HER2 + and TNBC subtypes. Non-inferiority trials were more likely to include QoL endpoints (50 %) than superiority trials (33.7 %). QoL reporting was higher in negative studies (45 %) compared to positive studies (33 %), with no significant difference based on journal impact factor.

Conclusion

Despite regulatory emphasis on patient-centered outcomes, QoL assessments remain underreported in publications of Phase III MBC trials. Standardized incorporation of QoL metrics is essential to better capture the holistic impact of therapies, improve clinical decision-making, and align oncologic research with patient priorities.
背景:在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中,治疗无法治愈,患者的生活质量(QoL)与传统的生存结果一样是一个关键的考虑因素。尽管越来越多的监管机构认识到,生活质量纳入当代III期试验的程度仍不清楚。方法:我们使用PubMed数据库,对2019年至2023年间发表的评估MBC治疗干预措施的III期随机对照试验进行了系统回顾。根据受体亚型(HR+、HER2+、TNBC)、试验设计(优势与非劣效性)、研究结果(阳性与阴性)和期刊影响因子对试验进行分类。主要结局是在已发表的结果中纳入生活质量结局。结果:在122个符合条件的试验中,仅36.9%纳入了生活质量测量。亚组分析显示,与HER2+和TNBC亚型相比,激素受体阳性患者的生活质量掺入率更高。非劣效性试验(50%)比优效性试验(33.7%)更可能包括生活质量终点。负面研究的生活质量报告(45%)高于正面研究(33%),基于期刊影响因子无显著差异。结论:尽管监管机构强调以患者为中心的结果,但在发表的三期MBC试验中,生活质量评估仍然被低估。生活质量指标的标准化整合对于更好地捕捉治疗的整体影响、改善临床决策以及使肿瘤研究与患者优先事项保持一致至关重要。
{"title":"Overlooked and underreported: A systematic review of quality of life in recent Phase III metastatic breast cancer trials","authors":"Shreyas Kalantri ,&nbsp;Chiranjeevi Sainatham ,&nbsp;Jayanth Reddy Tallapalli ,&nbsp;Pranali Pachika ,&nbsp;Blake Kelley ,&nbsp;Ranadheer Reddy Dande ,&nbsp;Greeshma Gaddipati ,&nbsp;Zhanxu Liu ,&nbsp;Maiying Kong ,&nbsp;Brian Dong ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Riley","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100653","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100653","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), where treatment is non-curative, patient quality of life (QoL) is a critical consideration alongside traditional survival outcomes. Despite increasing recognition by regulatory bodies, the extent of QoL incorporation into contemporary Phase III trials remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of Phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for MBC published between 2019 and 2023, using the PubMed database. Trials were categorized based on receptor subtype (HR+, HER2 +, TNBC), trial design (superiority vs. non-inferiority), study outcome (positive vs. negative), and journal impact factor. The primary outcome was the incorporation of QoL outcomes in published results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 122 eligible trials, only 36.9 % included QoL measures. Subgroup analysis revealed higher QoL incorporation in hormone receptor-positive trials compared to HER2 + and TNBC subtypes. Non-inferiority trials were more likely to include QoL endpoints (50 %) than superiority trials (33.7 %). QoL reporting was higher in negative studies (45 %) compared to positive studies (33 %), with no significant difference based on journal impact factor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite regulatory emphasis on patient-centered outcomes, QoL assessments remain underreported in publications of Phase III MBC trials. Standardized incorporation of QoL metrics is essential to better capture the holistic impact of therapies, improve clinical decision-making, and align oncologic research with patient priorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organizing contemporary oncology care together – A scoping review on multi-hospital oncology networks 共同组织当代肿瘤护理——多医院肿瘤网络的范围审查。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100651
Roos van der Ven , Daan Westra , Felice van Erning , Ignace de Hingh , Aggie Paulus , on behalf of the OncoZON consortium

Introduction

In oncology, hospitals increasingly collaborate in multi-hospital networks to deliver high-quality care. However, it is unclear how these networks should be organized and whether they are effective.

Methods

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review included peer-reviewed studies on multi-hospital oncology networks of three or more autonomous hospitals collaborating to deliver services and improve quality of care in high income economies, published in English.

Results

The search yielded 4.013 hits, of which 47 articles were included. Results revealed that the research field is relatively young, remains in part descriptive, and is highly fragmented, leaving questions about the optimal organization of multi-hospital networks. Although multi-hospital networks exhibit similar, centralized structural features, they vary in the way they are governed. Furthermore, although network outcomes are generally positive, studies predominantly focus on process-outcomes rather than patient-outcomes and often suffer from methodological flaws.

Policy summary

Insights from this review can be used by clinicians and hospital leaders to enhance their chances of network success, and by researchers as a guide for future studies. Multi-hospital oncology networks are increasingly organized, often as centralized hub-and-spoke models. To ensure these networks truly benefit patients, policies could support balanced collaboration between expert and non-expert centers, strengthen joint decision-making, and focus on patient outcomes rather than only process improvements. Further research on these networks is needed to better inform policy. This requires shared terminology, strengthened study designs, and integration of insights across fields.

Registry Name and Number

This review is pre-registered at Open Science Framework (blinded for peer review).
在肿瘤学领域,医院越来越多地在多医院网络中合作,以提供高质量的护理。然而,目前尚不清楚这些网络应该如何组织,以及它们是否有效。方法:遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,本范围审查纳入了同行评议的研究,这些研究涉及高收入经济体中三家或更多自主医院合作提供服务和提高护理质量的多医院肿瘤网络,并以英文发表。结果:检索结果为4.013条,其中包含47篇文章。结果表明,研究领域是相对年轻的,仍然是部分描述性的,是高度碎片化的,留下关于多医院网络的最佳组织的问题。尽管多医院网络表现出类似的集中结构特征,但它们在管理方式上有所不同。此外,尽管网络结果通常是积极的,但研究主要关注过程结果而不是患者结果,并且经常存在方法上的缺陷。政策总结:本综述的见解可被临床医生和医院领导用于提高其网络成功的机会,并被研究人员用作未来研究的指南。多医院肿瘤网络越来越有组织,通常是集中的中心辐射模式。为了确保这些网络真正使患者受益,政策可以支持专家和非专家中心之间的平衡合作,加强联合决策,并关注患者的结果,而不仅仅是过程改进。需要对这些网络进行进一步研究,以便更好地为政策提供信息。这需要共享术语,加强研究设计,并整合跨领域的见解。注册中心名称和编号:本综述已在开放科学框架(Open Science Framework)预注册(盲标同行评审)。
{"title":"Organizing contemporary oncology care together – A scoping review on multi-hospital oncology networks","authors":"Roos van der Ven ,&nbsp;Daan Westra ,&nbsp;Felice van Erning ,&nbsp;Ignace de Hingh ,&nbsp;Aggie Paulus ,&nbsp;on behalf of the OncoZON consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100651","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100651","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In oncology, hospitals increasingly collaborate in multi-hospital networks to deliver high-quality care. However, it is unclear how these networks should be organized and whether they are effective.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review included peer-reviewed studies on multi-hospital oncology networks of three or more autonomous hospitals collaborating to deliver services and improve quality of care in high income economies, published in English.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 4.013 hits, of which 47 articles were included. Results revealed that the research field is relatively young, remains in part descriptive, and is highly fragmented, leaving questions about the optimal organization of multi-hospital networks. Although multi-hospital networks exhibit similar, centralized structural features, they vary in the way they are governed. Furthermore, although network outcomes are generally positive, studies predominantly focus on process-outcomes rather than patient-outcomes and often suffer from methodological flaws.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>Insights from this review can be used by clinicians and hospital leaders to enhance their chances of network success, and by researchers as a guide for future studies. Multi-hospital oncology networks are increasingly organized, often as centralized hub-and-spoke models. To ensure these networks truly benefit patients, policies could support balanced collaboration between expert and non-expert centers, strengthen joint decision-making, and focus on patient outcomes rather than only process improvements. Further research on these networks is needed to better inform policy. This requires shared terminology, strengthened study designs, and integration of insights across fields.</div></div><div><h3>Registry Name and Number</h3><div>This review is pre-registered at Open Science Framework (<em>blinded for peer review</em>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Central and Eastern Europe: A crucible for clinical cancer innovation? 中欧和东欧:临床癌症创新的熔炉?
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100647
Mark Lawler , Susan Bhatti , Pawel Przewiezlikowski , Birgit Wolf , Joanna Frątczak-Kazana , Piotr Rutkowski , Peter Šišovský , Lidia Zielińska , Axel Glasmacher
Clinical research in oncology is essential for improving patient outcomes; however, cancer care provision and access to novel therapies remains highly heterogeneous across Europe, particularly between Western and Eastern EU27 regions. This has been further compounded by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, severely disrupting regional cancer treatment, research infrastructures and clinical trials activity. Challenges to clinical research in the Central and Eastern regions of the European Union (EU27-CEE) are multifactorial, relating to patient access, local implementation and conduct of trials, education, infrastructure and regulatory procedures. Nevertheless, EU27-CEE comprises a very active clinical trial landscape with its specialist workforce, high productivity and quality of data, empowering a growing regional pharmaceutical industry and establishing itself as an important clinical cancer research hub for conducting global trials. Consequently, patients recruited in EU27-CEE exercise an important impact on global cancer drug development. Poland has proven to be a model for biomedical innovation, serving as the region’s blueprint for a productive clinical trials ecosystem. Multi-stakeholder collaboration and patient-centric approaches are required to streamline procedures for quicker trial initiation, simpler trial conduct, and better cross-border access. Recognizing these challenges and opportunities, we have developed, through a consultative approach, a Call to Action that, if implemented, would enhance the cancer clinical trials landscape in EU27-CEE countries and empower patient access to the latest advances and therapies in cancer drug development.
肿瘤学临床研究对改善患者预后至关重要;然而,癌症治疗的提供和新疗法的获得在整个欧洲,特别是在欧盟27国的西部和东部地区之间,仍然高度不同。俄罗斯入侵乌克兰进一步加剧了这种情况,严重破坏了区域癌症治疗、研究基础设施和临床试验活动。欧盟中部和东部地区(EU27-CEE)临床研究面临的挑战是多方面的,涉及患者可及性、试验的当地实施和开展、教育、基础设施和监管程序。尽管如此,欧盟27-中东欧地区拥有非常活跃的临床试验环境,拥有专业的劳动力、高生产率和高质量的数据,为不断增长的区域制药行业提供了动力,并将自己确立为开展全球试验的重要临床癌症研究中心。因此,在欧盟27-中东欧招募的患者对全球癌症药物开发具有重要影响。事实证明,波兰是生物医学创新的典范,是该地区高效临床试验生态系统的蓝图。需要多方利益攸关方合作和以患者为中心的方法来简化程序,以更快地启动试验,更简单地进行试验,并更好地跨境获取。认识到这些挑战和机遇,我们通过协商的方式制定了一项行动呼吁,如果实施,将加强欧盟27-中东欧国家的癌症临床试验环境,并使患者能够获得癌症药物开发的最新进展和治疗方法。
{"title":"Central and Eastern Europe: A crucible for clinical cancer innovation?","authors":"Mark Lawler ,&nbsp;Susan Bhatti ,&nbsp;Pawel Przewiezlikowski ,&nbsp;Birgit Wolf ,&nbsp;Joanna Frątczak-Kazana ,&nbsp;Piotr Rutkowski ,&nbsp;Peter Šišovský ,&nbsp;Lidia Zielińska ,&nbsp;Axel Glasmacher","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100647","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100647","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical research in oncology is essential for improving patient outcomes; however, cancer care provision and access to novel therapies remains highly heterogeneous across Europe, particularly between Western and Eastern EU27 regions. This has been further compounded by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, severely disrupting regional cancer treatment, research infrastructures and clinical trials activity. Challenges to clinical research in the Central and Eastern regions of the European Union (EU27-CEE) are multifactorial, relating to patient access, local implementation and conduct of trials, education, infrastructure and regulatory procedures. Nevertheless, EU27-CEE comprises a very active clinical trial landscape with its specialist workforce, high productivity and quality of data, empowering a growing regional pharmaceutical industry and establishing itself as an important clinical cancer research hub for conducting global trials. Consequently, patients recruited in EU27-CEE exercise an important impact on global cancer drug development. Poland has proven to be a model for biomedical innovation, serving as the region’s blueprint for a productive clinical trials ecosystem. Multi-stakeholder collaboration and patient-centric approaches are required to streamline procedures for quicker trial initiation, simpler trial conduct, and better cross-border access. Recognizing these challenges and opportunities, we have developed, through a consultative approach, a Call to Action that, if implemented, would enhance the cancer clinical trials landscape in EU27-CEE countries and empower patient access to the latest advances and therapies in cancer drug development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indirect economic burden of cancer in populations in China, 2021: A measurement based on a human capital approach 2021年中国癌症间接经济负担:基于人力资本方法的系统测量
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100648
Xin-Yi Zhou , Xin Wang , Sen-Yao Cai , Yan-Jie Li , Jie-Bin Lew , Wanqing Chen , Ju-Fang Shi

Objectives

Cancer imposes an enormous burden. In China, research on cancer economic burden has primarily focused on the direct economic burden while the indirect economic burden of cancer (IEBC) has been overlooked. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic quantification of IEBC in populations in China.

Methods

A human capital approach was used to estimate the IEBC. The loss of productivity time was approximated based on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the GBD 2021. The labour force participation rate and per capita economic parameters were sourced from various datasets, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The indirect-to-direct economic burden ratio was estimated partially based on results from a literature review.

Results

The overall IEBC in populations in China was estimated to be CNY1014.4 billion in 2021, representing 0.89 % of the gross domestic product (GDP). Among this total, CNY990.3 billion (97.6 %) was attributed to premature death and CNY24.1 billion to disability; CNY822.3 billion (81.1 %) to males and CNY853.8 billion (84.2 %) to populations under the age of 60 years. Region heterogeneity was observed to be CNY26.5 billion for the Northwest and CNY263.7 billion for the East. Of the overall IEBC, 58.8 % (CNY596.9 billion) could be attributed to a range of modifiable risk factors (tobacco was the leading one at CNY304.6 billion); 76.0 % (CNY770.8 billion) was attributed to screening-targeted cancers, mainly gastrointestinal cancers (CNY458.2 billion), lung cancer (CNY232.9 billion), breast and cervical cancer (CNY57.2 billion). The by-cancer median value of the indirect-to-direct economic burden ratio was 2.56 (range 0.83–4.76).

Conclusions

The previously underestimated IEBC was roughly 3 times the reported direct economic burden in populations in China. Systematic quantification of the IEBC from "preventable" and "screenable" cancer types suggests there to be a potential extent of future economic benefit of implementing more effective and scaled-up population-based primary and secondary interventions.
目标:癌症带来了巨大的负担。在中国,对癌症经济负担的研究主要集中在直接经济负担上,而对癌症间接经济负担(IEBC)的研究被忽视。因此,我们的目标是在2021年对中国的IEBC进行系统量化。方法:采用人力资本方法对企业间创业行为进行评估。生产力时间损失是根据GBD 2021中的残疾调整生命年(DALYs)估算的。劳动力参与率和人均经济参数来源于各种数据集,并进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。间接与直接经济负担率的估算部分基于文献综述的结果。结果:2021年中国人口总体IEBC预计为10144亿元,占国内生产总值(GDP)的0.89%。其中,9903亿元(97.6%)归因于过早死亡,241亿元归因于残疾;男性8223亿元(81.1%),60岁以下8538亿元(84.2%)。区域异质性为西北265亿元,东部2637亿元。在总体的IEBC中,58.8%(5969亿元)可归因于一系列可改变的风险因素(烟草是主要风险,为3046亿元);76.0%(7708亿元)用于筛查靶向癌症,主要是胃肠道癌症(4582亿元)、肺癌(2329亿元)、乳腺癌和宫颈癌(572亿元)。不同癌症的间接-直接经济负担率中位数为2.56(范围0.83 ~ 4.76)。结论:以前被低估的IEBC大约是中国人口直接经济负担的3倍。对“可预防”和“可筛查”癌症类型的IEBC进行系统量化表明,实施更有效和规模更大的以人群为基础的初级和二级干预措施,在未来可能产生一定程度的经济效益。
{"title":"Indirect economic burden of cancer in populations in China, 2021: A measurement based on a human capital approach","authors":"Xin-Yi Zhou ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Sen-Yao Cai ,&nbsp;Yan-Jie Li ,&nbsp;Jie-Bin Lew ,&nbsp;Wanqing Chen ,&nbsp;Ju-Fang Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100648","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100648","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Cancer imposes an enormous burden. In China, research on cancer economic burden has primarily focused on the direct economic burden while the indirect economic burden of cancer (IEBC) has been overlooked. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic quantification of IEBC in populations in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A human capital approach was used to estimate the IEBC. The loss of productivity time was approximated based on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the GBD 2021. The labour force participation rate and per capita economic parameters were sourced from various datasets, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The indirect-to-direct economic burden ratio was estimated partially based on results from a literature review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall IEBC in populations in China was estimated to be CNY1014.4 billion in 2021, representing 0.89 % of the gross domestic product (GDP). Among this total, CNY990.3 billion (97.6 %) was attributed to premature death and CNY24.1 billion to disability; CNY822.3 billion (81.1 %) to males and CNY853.8 billion (84.2 %) to populations under the age of 60 years. Region heterogeneity was observed to be CNY26.5 billion for the Northwest and CNY263.7 billion for the East. Of the overall IEBC, 58.8 % (CNY596.9 billion) could be attributed to a range of modifiable risk factors (tobacco was the leading one at CNY304.6 billion); 76.0 % (CNY770.8 billion) was attributed to screening-targeted cancers, mainly gastrointestinal cancers (CNY458.2 billion), lung cancer (CNY232.9 billion), breast and cervical cancer (CNY57.2 billion). The by-cancer median value of the indirect-to-direct economic burden ratio was 2.56 (range 0.83–4.76).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The previously underestimated IEBC was roughly 3 times the reported direct economic burden in populations in China. Systematic quantification of the IEBC from \"preventable\" and \"screenable\" cancer types suggests there to be a potential extent of future economic benefit of implementing more effective and scaled-up population-based primary and secondary interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145313954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Invisible geographies - the rural and coastal blind spot in UK cancer policy: A content analysis 看不见的地理——英国癌症政策中的农村和沿海盲点:内容分析。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100650
David Nelson , Natalia Calanzani , Ben Pickwell-Smith , Katie Spencer , Samuel Cooke , Tanja K. Kleinhappel , Maxime Inghels , Kathie McPeake , Ros Kane , Shahana A. Naqvi , Eila Watson , Anna Prytherch , Rebecca Foster , Lynn Calman , Peter Selby , Mark Lawler , Peter Murchie

Background

The United Kingdom’s (UK) diverse geography means many people live in rural and coastal areas, where cancer outcomes are often poorer than in urban settings. Devolution means that the four nations of the UK have distinct approaches to cancer care. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have recently published national cancer strategies, while England’s new plan is expected later in 2025. This study examined UK cancer policy documents, to identify, how, and to what extent, rural or coastal issues were considered.

Methods

UK cancer policy documents from 2000 to 2024 were sourced via The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) website (https://iccp-portal.org/), UK government sites and Google. Documents were searched for rural and coastal related terms.

Results

Fifty-five documents were included (England n = 17; Northern Ireland n = 10; Scotland n = 21; Wales n = 7). No recent policies included a specific section or explicit recommendations for rural or coastal cancer care. Across the policies, contextual analysis highlighted that terms to promote rural or coastal equity rarely appeared within recommendations. Northern Ireland gave more attention to rural issues than other nations, as evidenced by a rural needs impact assessment and supporting documents to inform Northern Ireland’s Cancer Strategy 2022–2032.

Conclusion

Despite sizeable rural and coastal populations facing specific health challenges across the UK, national cancer policies excepting Northern Ireland gave minimal guidance for delivering cancer care tailored to these communities. Other UK nations should consider adopting more rural-centric approaches like Northern Ireland.

Policy summary

Coastal and rural health issues have received policy attention via the Chief Medical Officer for England’s annual reports (2021; 2023) and more recently in the UK Government’s 10 Year Health Plan for England (July 2025). However, when it comes to high-level cancer policy across the UK, the needs of rural and coastal people with cancer are not being adequately or specifically recognised.
背景:英国(UK)多样化的地理环境意味着许多人生活在农村和沿海地区,那里的癌症预后往往比城市环境差。权力下放意味着英国的四个国家有不同的癌症治疗方法。苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰最近公布了国家癌症战略,而英格兰的新计划预计将在2025年晚些时候出台。这项研究检查了英国的癌症政策文件,以确定如何以及在多大程度上考虑了农村或沿海问题。方法:从国际癌症控制伙伴关系(ICCP)网站(https://iccp-portal.org/)、英国政府网站和谷歌获取2000-2024年英国癌症政策文件。对文件进行了农村和沿海相关术语的搜索。结果:共纳入文献55篇(英格兰17篇;北爱尔兰10篇;苏格兰21篇;威尔士7篇)。最近的政策中没有针对农村或沿海地区癌症治疗的专门章节或明确建议。在所有政策中,背景分析强调,促进农村或沿海公平的术语很少出现在建议中。北爱尔兰比其他国家更关注农村问题,为北爱尔兰《2022-2032年癌症战略》提供信息的农村需求影响评估和支持性文件证明了这一点。结论:尽管英国各地有大量农村和沿海人口面临特定的健康挑战,但除了北爱尔兰以外,国家癌症政策对为这些社区提供量身定制的癌症护理提供了最低限度的指导。其他英国国家应该考虑采取像北爱尔兰那样以农村为中心的方法。政策摘要:通过英格兰首席医疗官的年度报告(2021年和2023年)以及最近的联合王国政府的《英格兰10年健康计划》(2025年7月),沿海和农村健康问题得到了政策关注。然而,当涉及到英国高水平的癌症政策时,农村和沿海地区癌症患者的需求没有得到充分或特别的认识。
{"title":"Invisible geographies - the rural and coastal blind spot in UK cancer policy: A content analysis","authors":"David Nelson ,&nbsp;Natalia Calanzani ,&nbsp;Ben Pickwell-Smith ,&nbsp;Katie Spencer ,&nbsp;Samuel Cooke ,&nbsp;Tanja K. Kleinhappel ,&nbsp;Maxime Inghels ,&nbsp;Kathie McPeake ,&nbsp;Ros Kane ,&nbsp;Shahana A. Naqvi ,&nbsp;Eila Watson ,&nbsp;Anna Prytherch ,&nbsp;Rebecca Foster ,&nbsp;Lynn Calman ,&nbsp;Peter Selby ,&nbsp;Mark Lawler ,&nbsp;Peter Murchie","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100650","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100650","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The United Kingdom’s (UK) diverse geography means many people live in rural and coastal areas, where cancer outcomes are often poorer than in urban settings. Devolution means that the four nations of the UK have distinct approaches to cancer care. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have recently published national cancer strategies, while England’s new plan is expected later in 2025. This study examined UK cancer policy documents, to identify, how, and to what extent, rural or coastal issues were considered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>UK cancer policy documents from 2000 to 2024 were sourced via The International Cancer Control Partnership (ICCP) website (<span><span>https://iccp-portal.org/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), UK government sites and Google. Documents were searched for rural and coastal related terms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-five documents were included (England n = 17; Northern Ireland n = 10; Scotland n = 21; Wales n = 7). No recent policies included a specific section or explicit recommendations for rural or coastal cancer care. Across the policies, contextual analysis highlighted that terms to promote rural or coastal equity rarely appeared within recommendations. Northern Ireland gave more attention to rural issues than other nations, as evidenced by a rural needs impact assessment and supporting documents to inform Northern Ireland’s Cancer Strategy 2022–2032.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite sizeable rural and coastal populations facing specific health challenges across the UK, national cancer policies excepting Northern Ireland gave minimal guidance for delivering cancer care tailored to these communities. Other UK nations should consider adopting more rural-centric approaches like Northern Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>Coastal and rural health issues have received policy attention via the Chief Medical Officer for England’s annual reports (2021; 2023) and more recently in the UK Government’s 10 Year Health Plan for England (July 2025). However, when it comes to high-level cancer policy across the UK, the needs of rural and coastal people with cancer are not being adequately or specifically recognised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145309629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal validation of the PROFFIT questionnaire to assess financial toxicity in cancer patients profit问卷评估癌症患者财务毒性的纵向验证。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100645
L. Arenare , C. Porta , D. Barberio , S. Terzolo , V. Zagonel , S. Pisconti , L. Del Mastro , C. Pinto , D. Bilancia , S. Cinieri , M. Rizzo , G. Migliaccio , V. Montesarchio , L. Del Campo , F. De Lorenzo , E. Iannellil , L. Gitto , C.M. Vaccaro , L. Frontini , D. Giannarelli , F. Perrone

Background

Financial toxicity (FT) is a growing issue for cancer patients worldwide. The PROFFIT questionnaire was developed in Italy to measure FT and identify its determinants in cancer patients within a public health system.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted with 221 cancer patients from 10 Italian centres between March 2021 and July 2022 to validate the PROFFIT questionnaire in patients undergoing active treatment. The PROFFIT and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires were administered. Statistical analyses were performed on the PROFFIT-score (items 1–7), the financial difficulties item (Q28), and the global health status/quality of life (HR-QOL) scale from the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Geographic disparities were also analysed.

Results

A total of 1149 questionnaires were completed (83 % paper-based, 17 % electronically). The median observation period was 5 months (IQR 4.5–5.8). Missing phenomenon increased over time but was not affected by the baseline PROFFIT-score. PROFFIT-score remained stable throughout treatment, with patients in Southern Italy reporting higher (worse) values. Significant associations (p < 0.0001) were found between PROFFIT-score and Q28 at all time-points. Moderate inverse correlations were observed between PROFFIT-score and HR-QOL.

Conclusions

PROFFIT shows strong longitudinal validity for assessing FT in cancer patients. PROFFIT-score does not significantly change during treatment, but regional disparities highlight the need for targeted interventions, particularly in underserved areas. Further research will define cut-off values and explore FT dynamics across different patient populations.

Policy Summary

PROFFIT validation analyses make the instrument suitable to measure FT in cancer patients within public health systems. In addition, it may represent a valuable tool to plan specific local health policies being sensible to macro-regional variability. Finally, on the long run, it might be useful to test the impact of policies implemented against FT.
背景:金融毒性(FT)是全球癌症患者日益关注的问题。PROFFIT问卷是在意大利开发的,用于测量FT并确定公共卫生系统中癌症患者的决定因素。方法:在2021年3月至2022年7月期间,对来自意大利10个中心的221名癌症患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以验证PROFFIT问卷在接受积极治疗的患者中的有效性。采用profit问卷和EORTC-QLQ-C30问卷。对proffit评分(项目1-7)、财务困难项目(Q28)和EORTC-QLQ-C30的整体健康状况/生活质量(HR-QOL)量表进行统计分析。还分析了地理差异。结果:共完成问卷1149份,其中纸质问卷83%,电子问卷17%。中位观察期为5个月(IQR 4.5 ~ 5.8)。缺失现象随着时间的推移而增加,但不受基线profit -score的影响。在整个治疗过程中,profit -评分保持稳定,意大利南部的患者报告更高(更差)的值。结论:PROFFIT在评估癌症患者的FT方面具有很强的纵向有效性。profit -score在治疗期间没有显著变化,但地区差异突出了有针对性干预的必要性,特别是在服务不足的地区。进一步的研究将定义临界值,并探索不同患者群体的FT动态。政策摘要:profit验证分析使该工具适用于在公共卫生系统中测量癌症患者的FT。此外,它可能是规划适合宏观区域变化的具体地方卫生政策的宝贵工具。最后,从长期来看,测试针对金融危机实施的政策的影响可能是有用的。
{"title":"Longitudinal validation of the PROFFIT questionnaire to assess financial toxicity in cancer patients","authors":"L. Arenare ,&nbsp;C. Porta ,&nbsp;D. Barberio ,&nbsp;S. Terzolo ,&nbsp;V. Zagonel ,&nbsp;S. Pisconti ,&nbsp;L. Del Mastro ,&nbsp;C. Pinto ,&nbsp;D. Bilancia ,&nbsp;S. Cinieri ,&nbsp;M. Rizzo ,&nbsp;G. Migliaccio ,&nbsp;V. Montesarchio ,&nbsp;L. Del Campo ,&nbsp;F. De Lorenzo ,&nbsp;E. Iannellil ,&nbsp;L. Gitto ,&nbsp;C.M. Vaccaro ,&nbsp;L. Frontini ,&nbsp;D. Giannarelli ,&nbsp;F. Perrone","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100645","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100645","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Financial toxicity (FT) is a growing issue for cancer patients worldwide. The PROFFIT questionnaire was developed in Italy to measure FT and identify its determinants in cancer patients within a public health system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective study was conducted with 221 cancer patients from 10 Italian centres between March 2021 and July 2022 to validate the PROFFIT questionnaire in patients undergoing active treatment. The PROFFIT and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires were administered. Statistical analyses were performed on the PROFFIT-score (items 1–7), the financial difficulties item (Q28), and the global health status/quality of life (HR-QOL) scale from the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Geographic disparities were also analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1149 questionnaires were completed (83 % paper-based, 17 % electronically). The median observation period was 5 months (IQR 4.5–5.8). Missing phenomenon increased over time but was not affected by the baseline PROFFIT-score. PROFFIT-score remained stable throughout treatment, with patients in Southern Italy reporting higher (worse) values. Significant associations (p &lt; 0.0001) were found between PROFFIT-score and Q28 at all time-points. Moderate inverse correlations were observed between PROFFIT-score and HR-QOL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PROFFIT shows strong longitudinal validity for assessing FT in cancer patients. PROFFIT-score does not significantly change during treatment, but regional disparities highlight the need for targeted interventions, particularly in underserved areas. Further research will define cut-off values and explore FT dynamics across different patient populations.</div></div><div><h3>Policy Summary</h3><div>PROFFIT validation analyses make the instrument suitable to measure FT in cancer patients within public health systems. In addition, it may represent a valuable tool to plan specific local health policies being sensible to macro-regional variability. Finally, on the long run, it might be useful to test the impact of policies implemented against FT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seizing the opportunity to leverage home-based palliative care for cancer education and screening in high-burden and resource-limited settings in India 抓住机会,在印度高负担和资源有限的环境中利用家庭姑息治疗进行癌症教育和筛查。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100646
Laxman Kumar Mahaseth , Subhadra Goala , Vidhubala Elangovan , Kathirvel Soundappan , Krishnakumar Rathnam , Bibha Thapa , Kanan Singha , Ravi Kannan

Background

Despite national screening efforts and a high cancer burden, the cancer screening rate is low in the northeast region of India. Seizing every opportunity for early detection is crucial in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the outcomes of cancer education and symptom screening (CESS) among family members and neighbours of cancer patients on home-based palliative care (Home-PC) in Barak Valley of Assam, India.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study based on record review. Trained lay health workers (TLHW) attached to a tertiary cancer hospital conducted CESS sessions (self-administered or facilitated questionnaire) during routine Home-PC visits.

Results

Of 916 individuals, 75 (8.2 %) reported cancer-related symptoms and 33 (44 %) attended the screening OPD of a tertiary hospital for assessment. Of them, 17 (51.5 %) were diagnosed with cancer, predominantly oral, breast, and other cancers. The median (interquartile range) days from symptom screening to screening OPD visit was 10 (2.5, 49.5) days, while from screening OPD visit to diagnosis was 1 (0, 8) day.

Conclusion

Integrating CESS into Home-PC is feasible and aids in prompt diagnosis in resource-limited settings. This strategy could be used as an opportunity for early cancer detection and management, especially in high-burden regions like Northeast India.
背景:尽管国家努力筛查和高癌症负担,癌症筛查率在印度东北部地区很低。抓住每一个早期发现的机会对于降低癌症相关发病率和死亡率至关重要。本研究评估了印度阿萨姆邦巴拉克山谷癌症患者家庭成员和邻居对家庭姑息治疗(Home-PC)的癌症教育和症状筛查(CESS)的结果。方法:这是一项基于文献回顾的回顾性队列研究。附属于三级癌症医院的训练有素的非专业保健工作者(TLHW)在常规家庭个人电脑访问期间进行了CESS会议(自我管理或辅助问卷调查)。结果:在916名患者中,75名(8.2%)报告了癌症相关症状,33名(44%)参加了三级医院的门诊筛查评估。其中17人(51.5%)被诊断患有癌症,主要是口腔癌、乳腺癌和其他癌症。从症状筛查到筛查门诊就诊的中位数(四分位数间距)为10(2.5,49.5)天,而从筛查门诊就诊到诊断为1(0,8)天。结论:在资源有限的情况下,将CESS纳入家庭pc是可行的,有助于及时诊断。这一策略可以作为早期癌症检测和管理的机会,特别是在印度东北部等高负担地区。
{"title":"Seizing the opportunity to leverage home-based palliative care for cancer education and screening in high-burden and resource-limited settings in India","authors":"Laxman Kumar Mahaseth ,&nbsp;Subhadra Goala ,&nbsp;Vidhubala Elangovan ,&nbsp;Kathirvel Soundappan ,&nbsp;Krishnakumar Rathnam ,&nbsp;Bibha Thapa ,&nbsp;Kanan Singha ,&nbsp;Ravi Kannan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100646","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100646","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite national screening efforts and a high cancer burden, the cancer screening rate is low in the northeast region of India. Seizing every opportunity for early detection is crucial in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the outcomes of cancer education and symptom screening (CESS) among family members and neighbours of cancer patients on home-based palliative care (Home-PC) in Barak Valley of Assam, India.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective cohort study based on record review. Trained lay health workers (TLHW) attached to a tertiary cancer hospital conducted CESS sessions (self-administered or facilitated questionnaire) during routine Home-PC visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 916 individuals, 75 (8.2 %) reported cancer-related symptoms and 33 (44 %) attended the screening OPD of a tertiary hospital for assessment. Of them, 17 (51.5 %) were diagnosed with cancer, predominantly oral, breast, and other cancers. The median (interquartile range) days from symptom screening to screening OPD visit was 10 (2.5, 49.5) days, while from screening OPD visit to diagnosis was 1 (0, 8) day.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Integrating CESS into Home-PC is feasible and aids in prompt diagnosis in resource-limited settings. This strategy could be used as an opportunity for early cancer detection and management, especially in high-burden regions like Northeast India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time to rethink diffusion modality of preliminary results from industry-sponsored clinical trials in oncology: Considerations from the Italian Network of Cancer Patients (ROPI). 是时候重新思考行业资助的肿瘤学临床试验初步结果的扩散模式了:来自意大利癌症患者网络(ROPI)的考虑。
IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100644
Stefania Gori
{"title":"Time to rethink diffusion modality of preliminary results from industry-sponsored clinical trials in oncology: Considerations from the Italian Network of Cancer Patients (ROPI).","authors":"Stefania Gori","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100644","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100644","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145182312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1