Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes最新文献

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for human coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) Concentrate is used as working standard for potency determination of human coagulation FVIII preparations by chromogenic assay. BRP batch 5 was established in 2015 and its stocks were running low. Therefore, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) initiated a project (BSP156) for the calibration of a replacement batch. The potency of BRP batch 6 was assigned during an international collaborative study involving 16 laboratories worldwide, with reference to the WHO 8th International Standard (IS) and BRP batch 5. Participants were instructed to perform 3 independent FVIII potency assays following their own routine validated methods for the chromogenic assay, which is the assay prescribed by the Ph. Eur. As an outcome of the study, Ph. Eur. human coagulation FVIII Concentrate BRP batch 6 was assigned a consensus potency of 9.9 IU/ampoule for the chromogenic assay. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 6 is a freeze-dried, plasma-derived concentrate. Based on accelerated degradation studies, the stability of the material is suitable for a reference preparation. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 6 was adopted at the 167th session of the Ph. Eur. Commission in June 2020 and is available from the EDQM under product code H0920000.

An international collaborative study was organised under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe and the European Union to calibrate a replacement batch for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Heparin sodium Biological Reference Preparation (BRP). Seventeen laboratories contributed data to value assign a candidate batch (cBRP4) in International Units (IU) against the WHO 6th International Standard for Unfractionated Heparin using chromogenic and sheep plasma clotting assays according to Ph. Eur. texts 2.7.5. on unfractionated heparin and 0878 on human antithrombin III. The continuity of consecutive batches of BRP was evaluated by including BRP3 in the set of test samples. The central analysis of the study data showed good precision and reproducibility of both chromo-genic and clotting assays among laboratories. Based on the study data, the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted cBRP4 as Ph. Eur. Heparin sodium BRP4 with assigned activities of 985 IU/mL for anti-IIa assays, 995 IU/mL for anti-Xa assays and 1035 IU/mL for sheep clotting assays.

During the production of clostridial vaccines large numbers of mice are used for various in-process control tests. Replacement in vitro assays had been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species, but none of these assays had been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), a project on clostridial vaccines for veterinary use was started as part of the EDQM-co-ordinated Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). Within the framework of this project (coded BSP130) a collaborative study was organised to evaluate Vero cell-based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure: i) the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin, ii) the absence of toxicity of C. septicum toxoid and iii) the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid. The principal aims of the study were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the in vitro and current in vivo tests. The study results demonstrated good concordance, but the information gathered through the study (later on called Part 1) and the participants' workshop prompted the extension of the project in order to further optimise the in vitro protocols and improve their repeatability and reproducibility, which were comparable to but not better than those of the in vivo assays in Part 1. The 3 in vitro assays to be optimised in the extension of the BSP130 project were : i) the in vitro toxin neutralisation equivalence plus (TNE+), as a replacement for the in vivo minimum lethal dose (MLD) test for quantification of the toxicity of toxin; ii) the in vitro MLD, as a replacement for the in vivo MLD test for detection of residual toxicity associated with toxoid; iii) the in vitro total combining power (TCP), as a replacement for the in vivo TCP test for quantification of the antigenicity of toxoid. At this point, the Analytical Method Transfer Laboratory of Ceva-Phylaxia (Hungary), supported by the project management team, developed suitable SOPs for the 3 in vitro assays. These optimised methods were further assessed in BSP130 through a second international collaborative study (Part 2) aimed at defining repeatability and reproducibility in different laboratories and determining the levels of improvement compared with the original in vivo tests and the initial in vitro assays used in Part 1 of the project. Fourteen laboratories, comprising 4 public sector and 10 manufacturers' medicines control laboratories, from 11 countries participated in the collaborative Part 2 study, each testing 6 different C. septicum toxins and 6 C. septicum toxoids. Improved repeatability and reproducibility were observed for the optimised assays. The results of this study confirm the suitability of these assays for in-process control of C. sep

An international collaborative study was organised to establish the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Erythromycin. Fifteen laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 2nd IS for Erythromycin was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 3rd IS for Erythromycin was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2018 with an assigned potency of 925 International Units (IU) per mg. The 3rd IS for Erythromycin is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

A project aimed at establishing replacement batches for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse antiserum was started in 2013 under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). This BRP is used for the immunogenicity assay in mice to assess the potency of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines as described in Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular). In a preliminary phase of the project (referred to herein as BSP129 phase 1) a hyper-immune serum pool was produced in mice using a combined aP vaccine as immunogen. This pool was used to generate 3 freeze-dried candidate (c) B. pertussis anti-mouse serum BRP batches (cBRP2, cBRP3 and cBRP4). After the pre-qualification that showed their suitability as candidate batches, an international collaborative study (BSP129 phase 2) was carried out in order to standardise these 3 batches against the current BRP1 in terms of anti-PT, -FHA, -PRN and -FIM2/3 antibody contents. For the sake of continuity with the standardisation of BRP1, the corresponding WHO standard (1RR 97/642) was introduced as a second reference for the calibration of the 3 candidate BRPs. Eleven laboratories took part in phase 2. Ten of them performed the ELISA method they use routinely for aP vaccine batch release and one laboratory performed the Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) as an alternative test. Four participants titrated the antibodies against all 5 pertussis antigens, 5 participants determined the antibody content against 3 antigens (PT, FHA, PRN), one participant titrated the antibodies against PT and FHA antigens and one laboratory determined the antibody content for the PT antigen only. Details of all ELISA methods used were analysed to evaluate their impact on the calibration of the cBRPs. The variability of the results in relation to the nature and methodology of the tests appeared rather limited. Discrepant titres of cBRPs were measured depending on the reference used: the use of the 1RR induced an overestimation (in 8 out of 11 laboratories) and a large inter-laboratory variation in the calculated titres. Regardless of the reference used, equivalency between the calculated titres of cBRP2 and cBRP3 was observed, whilst cBRP4 had systematically lower titres for all antibodies against the 5 acellular pertussis vaccine components. Based on these observations, it was decided to establish the candidate BRP batches against BRP1 and to assign the following potencies based on the mean values determined through centrally calculated results of the calibration assays performed by ELISA in BSP129 phase 2: For cBRP2 and cBRP3 Anti-pertussis toxin: 37 ELISA Units (ELU) per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 114 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin: 44 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3): 25 ELU per vial For cBRP4 Anti-pertussis toxin: 32 ELU per

An international collaborative study was organised to establish the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for amphotericin B. Sixteen laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 2nd IS for amphotericin B was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 3rd IS for amphotericin B was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee for Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2019 with an assigned potency of 953 International Units (IU) per mg. The 3rd IS for amphotericin B is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

Two preparations of the chimeric anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody Infliximab were formulated and lyophilised at the National Institute for Biological Standards & Control (NIBSC) prior to evaluation in a collaborative study for their suitability to serve as a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS)/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for the potency assay of Infliximab. Twenty-six laboratories tested the preparations using different in vitro cell-based bioassays (TNF-α neutralisation, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity) and binding assays. Amongst them, 19 laboratories performed cell-based bioassays. The results of this study indicated that the candidate preparation coded 16/170 was suitable to serve as an International Standard for Infliximab based on the data obtained for biological activity. This candidate standard was established in 2017 as the first International Standard for Infliximab with an assigned potency for TNF neutralisation activity of 500 IU per ampoule. In the same study, the suitability of preparation 16/170 of Infliximab to serve as the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for the Infliximab potency assay as described in the Ph. Eur. monograph on Infliximab concentrated solution (2928) was also evaluated. The corresponding analysis, based on the measurement of the inhibitory action of anti-human TNF (Infliximab) on the cytotoxic activity of TNF-alpha, was performed using data from a subset of 9 laboratories using the TNF-alpha-sensitive fibrosarcoma cell line WEHI-164. The results obtained were compared to those obtained from different cell-based neutralisation assays that were used by other laboratories in the context of establishing the 1st World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Infliximab. Based on the analyses, preparation 16/170 was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission in June 2018 as Infliximab BRP batch 1 with an assigned potency of 500 IU per ampoule.

Three preparations of the human tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor II Fc fusion protein (TNFR II-Fc) Etanercept were formulated and lyophilised at the National Institute for Biological Standards & Control (NIBSC) prior to evaluation in a collaborative study for their suitability to serve as a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS)/European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for the potency assay of Etanercept. Seven laboratories tested the preparations using an in vitro cell-based bioassay (TNF-α neutralisation) prescribed by the Ph. Eur. monograph on Etanercept (2895). The results of this study indicated that the candidate preparation, coded 13/204, established as the first IS for Etanercept with an assigned potency for TNF neutralisation activity of 10 000 IU per ampoule was also suitable to serve as Ph. Eur. BRP batch 1. The results were compared to those obtained with different cell-based neutralisation assays that were used by further laboratories in the context of establishing the 1st WHO IS for Etanercept. Based on these analyses, preparation 13/204 was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Etanercept BRP batch 1 with an assigned potency of 10 000 IU per ampoule.

Equine influenza (EI) is an important respiratory disease of horses, with welfare and economic consequences. Vaccination remains one of the most efficient prevention methods available. Equine influenza virus (EIV) is constantly evolving and consequently EI vaccines need to be updated on a regular basis. In 2010, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Expert Surveillance Panel (ESP) on EI provided a new recommendation for EI vaccine strain composition, including the incorporation of representative EIV strains of both Florida Clade 1 and Clade 2 sub-lineages (FC1 and FC2, respectively). In this context, the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) - OIE reference panel for EI had to be complemented by an antiserum raised in horses against the FC2 representative EIV strain A/eq/Richmond/1/07. An international collaborative study was organised and managed by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) within the framework of its Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). The study aimed at evaluating a new candidate reference for use as a common OIE International Standard/Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) horse antiserum to FC2 EIV A/equine/Richmond/1/07. The standard was to be established using the SRH and HI tests for subsequent use in immunogenicity, efficacy and batch potency assay of EI vaccines as a Ph. Eur. BRP (Ph. Eur. monograph 0249) and for use in clinical diagnostic tests as an OIE-approved International Standard Reagent (OIE chapter 3.5.7). The collaborative study confirmed the suitability of the candidate and an SRH titre was assigned. The candidate was adopted as a BRP by the Ph. Eur. Commission and approved by the OIE Biological Standards Commission as an International Standard Serum in November 2017 and February 2018, respectively.

Large numbers of mice are used in testing during the production of Clostridial vaccines. Previous work has indicated that cell line assays could replace mouse tests for certain aspects of this testing. Replacement assays have been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species but none of these assays have been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), collaborative study BSP130 was initiated to evaluate Vero cell based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin (the minimum lethal dose (MLD) test), the freedom from toxicity of C. septicum toxoid (the MLD test) and the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid (the total combining power (TCP) test). The principal aims of BSP130 were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the proposed in vitro and current in vivo TCP and MLD tests. 11 laboratories from 7 countries participated in the collaborative study and each tested 6 toxins and 6 toxoids. The participants' Vero cell lines were up to 1 000 times more sensitive than the mouse strains. The MLD assay in mice and on Vero cells generally ranked the toxins in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The TCP assay in mice and on Vero cells also generally ranked the toxoids in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The results demonstrate that the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro Vero cell based assays are no worse than that of the in vivo assays and that they are easily transferable to other laboratories. The concordance correlations between the in vivo and in vitro methods were for the MLD assays ρc=0.961 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.921 (non-log-transformed values) and for the TCP assays ρc=0.968 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.980 (non log-transformed values). These correlations are excellent showing that the Vero cell assays can be used as alternatives to the mouse tests for the assessment of C. septicum toxin MLD and toxoid TCP values. This study can be used by vaccine manufacturing companies as a guide for applying the same approach to other clostridial toxins and toxoids.