Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes最新文献

Following a decision of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Commission, the Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCM) Working Party started a pilot phase to examine the suitability of a high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) minimum content test as an alternative to the classical assay in TCM monographs. This approach was evaluated with two TCM herbal drugs: Fritillaria thunbergii bulbs (FTB) and Corydalis rhizome (CYR). Firstly, the existing HPTLC methods were optimised for both drugs. The new methods were applied to the evaluation of multiple samples, and acceptance criteria for the identification, following Ph. Eur. chapter 2.8.25. High-performance thin-layer chromatography of herbal drugs and herbal drug preparations, were set. The HPTLC test for minimum content of markers was then developed and validated. In this test, the intensity of the marker zone in the fingerprint of the sample is compared to the corresponding zone in the reference solution, which has a concentration giving an intensity equivalent to the acceptance criterion. This test gives a pass or fail result rather than a content and can be performed visually (on the images) or by software (using peak profiles from images; PPI). Reproducibility of the HPTLC methods was evaluated in a collaborative trial including six laboratories. In summary, results for FTB from five laboratories were in agreement. The remaining laboratory did not pass the identification of the samples. For CYR, all laboratories presented the same results for identification. In the test for minimum content, one borderline sample passed in four laboratories and failed in two. All laboratories reached similar conclusions for the other seven samples. The HPTLC methods proposed offer a simplified approach to evaluating identity and minimum content of TCM drugs in a single analysis.

A joint World Health Organization (WHO) - European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) study was run to calibrate the WHO 5th International Standard (IS) for Blood Coagulation Factor IX (FIX), Concentrate, and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Human Coagulation Factor IX concentrate Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Batch 3. The suitability of the 4th IS as a potency standard for purified full-length recombinant FIX (rFIX) was also investigated. Forty-nine laboratories contributed data for the calibration of 2 plasma-derived FIX candidates, relative to the 4th IS, from clotting and chromogenic assays. The intra-laboratory variability was reasonably low; the inter-laboratory variation was lower for sample B (14/148) than for sample C (14/162). Although there were no discrepancies between clotting and chromogenic assays, a significantly lower potency was obtained for sample C with clotting assays when buffer rather than FIX-deficient plasma was used as pre-diluent. A significant assay discrepancy was observed with estimates for the 4th IS for Blood Coagulation Factors FII, VII, IX, X, Plasma against the 4th IS, resulting in a clotting to chromogenic activity ratio of 1.11. The study also investigated the comparability of the plasma-derived concentrate standard with the rFIX products and considered the establishment of an IS for rFIX. The 3 rFIX products currently licensed were represented in this study. Data from 49 laboratories for 2 rFIX candidates were received, with additional results for another full-length rFIX test sample returned by 6 laboratories. The intra-laboratory variability when the rFIX samples were assayed against the 4th IS was acceptably low. Although the full-length rFIX could be assayed against the plasma-derived 4th IS and provided statistically valid results, there were large discrepancies among the clotting assays using different APTT reagents. The inter-laboratory variability of the chromogenic assays was similarly high. There were also significant clotting and chromogenic assay discrepancies. The data from the present study indicate that a recombinant standard for rFIX products will minimise assay discrepancies and improve inter-laboratory agreement. However, they also underline that the value assignment of the 1st rFIX IS needs careful consideration. The Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) of WHO was therefore not requested to consider the establishment of an IS for rFIX. In order to ensure continued harmonised standards, sample B (14/148) was established as the WHO 5th IS for Blood Coagulation Factor IX, Concentrate, and as Ph. Eur. Human Coagulation Factor IX, concentrate BRP Batch 3 with the functional activity of 10.5 IU/ampoule.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), includes both individual monographs on essential oils and a general monograph that covers all essential oils for pharmaceutical use, whether covered by an individual monograph or not. The individual monographs generally describe gas chromatography as a first identification test, while thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) methods are included in the second identification series. To comply with Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.8.25. High-performance thin-layer chromatography of herbal drugs and herbal drug preparations, HPTLC parameters must be standardised. Currently, 18 of the 32 monographs on essential oils feature the same TLC/HPTLC method, but differ in terms of the other conditions described. A single, standardised chromatographic system with a system suitability test (SST) and intensity markers for all 32 essential oils covered by individual monographs would be desirable, particularly for pharmacies and other users that cannot perform gas chromatography for financial reasons. To this end, this paper describes the development of a general HPTLC method for the identification of essential oils in compliance with general chapter 2.8.25. The method proposes the use of ethyl acetate, toluene (5:95 V/V) as mobile phase, isoeugenol/isoeugenyl acetate for the SST, and a combination of one alcohol (either borneol or linalool) and one ester (either linalyl acetate or bornyl acetate) as intensity markers.

Recently, the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell-based clustering assay replaced the in vivo Histamine Sensitisation Test (HIST) in mice in European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) general chapter 2.6.33. ‘Residual pertussis toxin’ as the recommended method to test for residual pertussis toxin in acellular pertussis vaccine intermediates. To support the standardised CHO clustering assay, availability of a reference standard is critical. Ph. Eur. pertussis toxin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 1 was first calibrated in International Units in 2008 for the HIST and subsequently also calibrated for the CHO clustering assay in 2017. However, its stocks were dwindling and needed to be replaced. In an effort to maintain adequate supply, a project (BSP141) was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme, to establish a second pertussis toxin BRP (BRP2). Candidate material was manufactured ad hoc by an acellular pertussis vaccine manufacturer and an optimal formulation for long-term stability was defined. Exhaustive in-process and post-production controls demonstrated that the material was fit for its intended purpose and therefore a collaborative study for calibration and stability assessment of the candidate material was organised, which included 10 laboratories worldwide. As a result of the study, the candidate material was established as Ph. Eur. Pertussis toxin BRP batch 2 with a potency of 130 IU/vial for the CHO clustering assay. Unopened vials must be stored at −20°C. The BRP may be used for up to two weeks after reconstitution if appropriately handled and stored at 2–8°C.

To comply with European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph Human albumin solution (0255), albumin solutions have to be tested for molecular-size distribution by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). However, differences in interpretation of the test results continue to be observed among albumin manufacturers in Europe. A collaborative study was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP), to support the revision of Ph. Eur. monograph 0255 and to establish a Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for use in the molecular-size distribution test. In 2019, Ph. Eur. Expert Group 6B proposed to include an analytical improvement of the SEC procedure in the monograph, which was then submitted for public enquiry. This publication describes the evaluation of three candidate BRPs to serve as a tool for both the system suitability test (SST) and albumin monomer and dimer peak identification according to the proposed revised methodology. Three Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) involved in the official batch release of human albumin solution took part in the study. Based on the study results, the candidate BRPs were found suitable for purpose and were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Ph. Eur. Human albumin (molecular size) BRP batches 1, 2 and 3 concomitantly with the revised monograph Human albumin solution (0255) in November 2020.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for human coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) Concentrate is used as working standard for potency determination of human coagulation FVIII preparations by chromogenic assay. BRP batch 5 was established in 2015 and its stocks were running low. Therefore, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) initiated a project (BSP156) for the calibration of a replacement batch. The potency of BRP batch 6 was assigned during an international collaborative study involving 16 laboratories worldwide, with reference to the WHO 8th International Standard (IS) and BRP batch 5. Participants were instructed to perform 3 independent FVIII potency assays following their own routine validated methods for the chromogenic assay, which is the assay prescribed by the Ph. Eur. As an outcome of the study, Ph. Eur. human coagulation FVIII Concentrate BRP batch 6 was assigned a consensus potency of 9.9 IU/ampoule for the chromogenic assay. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 6 is a freeze-dried, plasma-derived concentrate. Based on accelerated degradation studies, the stability of the material is suitable for a reference preparation. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 6 was adopted at the 167th session of the Ph. Eur. Commission in June 2020 and is available from the EDQM under product code H0920000.

An international collaborative study was organised under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe and the European Union to calibrate a replacement batch for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Heparin sodium Biological Reference Preparation (BRP). Seventeen laboratories contributed data to value assign a candidate batch (cBRP4) in International Units (IU) against the WHO 6th International Standard for Unfractionated Heparin using chromogenic and sheep plasma clotting assays according to Ph. Eur. texts 2.7.5. on unfractionated heparin and 0878 on human antithrombin III. The continuity of consecutive batches of BRP was evaluated by including BRP3 in the set of test samples. The central analysis of the study data showed good precision and reproducibility of both chromo-genic and clotting assays among laboratories. Based on the study data, the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted cBRP4 as Ph. Eur. Heparin sodium BRP4 with assigned activities of 985 IU/mL for anti-IIa assays, 995 IU/mL for anti-Xa assays and 1035 IU/mL for sheep clotting assays.

During the production of clostridial vaccines large numbers of mice are used for various in-process control tests. Replacement in vitro assays had been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species, but none of these assays had been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), a project on clostridial vaccines for veterinary use was started as part of the EDQM-co-ordinated Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). Within the framework of this project (coded BSP130) a collaborative study was organised to evaluate Vero cell-based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure: i) the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin, ii) the absence of toxicity of C. septicum toxoid and iii) the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid. The principal aims of the study were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the in vitro and current in vivo tests. The study results demonstrated good concordance, but the information gathered through the study (later on called Part 1) and the participants' workshop prompted the extension of the project in order to further optimise the in vitro protocols and improve their repeatability and reproducibility, which were comparable to but not better than those of the in vivo assays in Part 1. The 3 in vitro assays to be optimised in the extension of the BSP130 project were : i) the in vitro toxin neutralisation equivalence plus (TNE+), as a replacement for the in vivo minimum lethal dose (MLD) test for quantification of the toxicity of toxin; ii) the in vitro MLD, as a replacement for the in vivo MLD test for detection of residual toxicity associated with toxoid; iii) the in vitro total combining power (TCP), as a replacement for the in vivo TCP test for quantification of the antigenicity of toxoid. At this point, the Analytical Method Transfer Laboratory of Ceva-Phylaxia (Hungary), supported by the project management team, developed suitable SOPs for the 3 in vitro assays. These optimised methods were further assessed in BSP130 through a second international collaborative study (Part 2) aimed at defining repeatability and reproducibility in different laboratories and determining the levels of improvement compared with the original in vivo tests and the initial in vitro assays used in Part 1 of the project. Fourteen laboratories, comprising 4 public sector and 10 manufacturers' medicines control laboratories, from 11 countries participated in the collaborative Part 2 study, each testing 6 different C. septicum toxins and 6 C. septicum toxoids. Improved repeatability and reproducibility were observed for the optimised assays. The results of this study confirm the suitability of these assays for in-process control of C. sep

An international collaborative study was organised to establish the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Erythromycin. Fifteen laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 2nd IS for Erythromycin was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 3rd IS for Erythromycin was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2018 with an assigned potency of 925 International Units (IU) per mg. The 3rd IS for Erythromycin is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

A project aimed at establishing replacement batches for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse antiserum was started in 2013 under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). This BRP is used for the immunogenicity assay in mice to assess the potency of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines as described in Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular). In a preliminary phase of the project (referred to herein as BSP129 phase 1) a hyper-immune serum pool was produced in mice using a combined aP vaccine as immunogen. This pool was used to generate 3 freeze-dried candidate (c) B. pertussis anti-mouse serum BRP batches (cBRP2, cBRP3 and cBRP4). After the pre-qualification that showed their suitability as candidate batches, an international collaborative study (BSP129 phase 2) was carried out in order to standardise these 3 batches against the current BRP1 in terms of anti-PT, -FHA, -PRN and -FIM2/3 antibody contents. For the sake of continuity with the standardisation of BRP1, the corresponding WHO standard (1RR 97/642) was introduced as a second reference for the calibration of the 3 candidate BRPs. Eleven laboratories took part in phase 2. Ten of them performed the ELISA method they use routinely for aP vaccine batch release and one laboratory performed the Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) as an alternative test. Four participants titrated the antibodies against all 5 pertussis antigens, 5 participants determined the antibody content against 3 antigens (PT, FHA, PRN), one participant titrated the antibodies against PT and FHA antigens and one laboratory determined the antibody content for the PT antigen only. Details of all ELISA methods used were analysed to evaluate their impact on the calibration of the cBRPs. The variability of the results in relation to the nature and methodology of the tests appeared rather limited. Discrepant titres of cBRPs were measured depending on the reference used: the use of the 1RR induced an overestimation (in 8 out of 11 laboratories) and a large inter-laboratory variation in the calculated titres. Regardless of the reference used, equivalency between the calculated titres of cBRP2 and cBRP3 was observed, whilst cBRP4 had systematically lower titres for all antibodies against the 5 acellular pertussis vaccine components. Based on these observations, it was decided to establish the candidate BRP batches against BRP1 and to assign the following potencies based on the mean values determined through centrally calculated results of the calibration assays performed by ELISA in BSP129 phase 2: For cBRP2 and cBRP3 Anti-pertussis toxin: 37 ELISA Units (ELU) per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 114 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin: 44 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3): 25 ELU per vial For cBRP4 Anti-pertussis toxin: 32 ELU per