Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a01
Ivanise Monfredini
Nesse texto desenvolvemos ideias apresentadas no evento “La Educación Superior en el actual debate sobre la privatización de la ciencia” aprofundando a análise sobre os desafios que se colocam para a pesquisa e produção de conhecimentos em ciências sociais e humanas no Brasil, considerando a predominância do setor privado no ensino superior, e a economia do conhecimento a ele relacionada. Trata-se de um ensaio desen-volvido a partir da análise de literatura sobre o tema e que teve o objetivo de apresentar e problematizar os atravessamentos colocados para essa área do conhecimento num momento histórico do país em que o desmonte de políticas científicas e tecnológicas e a sua posterior retomada em outros termos, pode afetar as ciências sociais, no seu estatuto epistemológico. A conclusão é a de que a área passa por desvalorização e tentativa de submissão aos critérios rentáveis, para adaptação às exigências da economia do conhe-cimento, no Brasil.
{"title":"Atravessamentos às Ciências Sociais e Humanas no Brasil: ensino superior privatizado e economia do conhecimento","authors":"Ivanise Monfredini","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a01","url":null,"abstract":"Nesse texto desenvolvemos ideias apresentadas no evento “La Educación Superior en el actual debate sobre la privatización de la ciencia” aprofundando a análise sobre os desafios que se colocam para a pesquisa e produção de conhecimentos em ciências sociais e humanas no Brasil, considerando a predominância do setor privado no ensino superior, e a economia do conhecimento a ele relacionada. Trata-se de um ensaio desen-volvido a partir da análise de literatura sobre o tema e que teve o objetivo de apresentar e problematizar os atravessamentos colocados para essa área do conhecimento num momento histórico do país em que o desmonte de políticas científicas e tecnológicas e a sua posterior retomada em outros termos, pode afetar as ciências sociais, no seu estatuto epistemológico. A conclusão é a de que a área passa por desvalorização e tentativa de submissão aos critérios rentáveis, para adaptação às exigências da economia do conhe-cimento, no Brasil.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a000
Susan Harper
Renowned African American essayist, author, and cultural critic James Baldwin (1962) famously reminded us that “not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced” (p.11). Learning to face and to name that which is in need of transformation, in need of justice, is in some ways the most difficult aspect of social justice work. This is both because we are trained from an early age not to see those injustices (especially when we occupy positions of social privilege) and because the most profound injustices tend to work at a level just below that which we can readily see, recognize, and name. Perhaps the real power of structural violence (sometimes known as institutional violence) is its very invisibility or its ability to skim along just under the surface of the social and individual consciousness, the way it is inextricably part of the warp and weft of society is such that to recognize the violence inherent in our structures and institutions is to question (and to some minds, threaten) the very foundations of a way of life.
{"title":"Structural Violence: Let`s Face It","authors":"Susan Harper","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a000","url":null,"abstract":"Renowned African American essayist, author, and cultural critic James Baldwin (1962) famously reminded us that “not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced” (p.11). Learning to face and to name that which is in need of transformation, in need of justice, is in some ways the most difficult aspect of social justice work. This is both because we are trained from an early age not to see those injustices (especially when we occupy positions of social privilege) and because the most profound injustices tend to work at a level just below that which we can readily see, recognize, and name. Perhaps the real power of structural violence (sometimes known as institutional violence) is its very invisibility or its ability to skim along just under the surface of the social and individual consciousness, the way it is inextricably part of the warp and weft of society is such that to recognize the violence inherent in our structures and institutions is to question (and to some minds, threaten) the very foundations of a way of life.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a07
Judith Naidorf, Catalina López Ordoñez
La pedagogía y su definición requiere ser repensada desde su causa, es decir, el “por qué”, y sentida desde una mirada poética, tras la cual su enunciación nunca es neutral ni exenta de ideología. Este texto procura reflexionar y recuperar algunas de las definiciones clásicas y aquellas más recientes, a partir de una amplia indagación en torno a la misma. El objetivo ha sido reconocer y cuestionar las definiciones contextuadas y contrapuestas que considera una indagación teórica, producto de un reconocimiento enlazado con la experticia dada por el quehacer pedagógico como actores educati- vos, mismo que nos lleva a dialogar con diversos autores. Además, propone una ruta para ampliar el camino a través de pensadores y corrientes hegemónicas y subalternizadas, desde una vital revisión que recupere los desafíos de las múltiples perspectivas de género y de la mirada sensible sobre una pedagogía crítica (y revolucionaria) de construcción permanente. De ahí que nos refiramos a la poiesis de la pedagogía como el camino para una actividad productiva, fabricativa, amorosa, de integralidad, social, cultural y política; que, a decir de Gabriela Mistral (2017), habrá que asumirla como praxis deliberada que incumbe al pedagogue y le posiciona desde una mirada libre, ética, estética y espiritual.
{"title":"La poiesis de la pedagogía","authors":"Judith Naidorf, Catalina López Ordoñez","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a07","url":null,"abstract":"La pedagogía y su definición requiere ser repensada desde su causa, es decir, el “por qué”, y sentida desde una mirada poética, tras la cual su enunciación nunca es neutral ni exenta de ideología. Este texto procura reflexionar y recuperar algunas de las definiciones clásicas y aquellas más recientes, a partir de una amplia indagación en torno a la misma. El objetivo ha sido reconocer y cuestionar las definiciones contextuadas y contrapuestas que considera una indagación teórica, producto de un reconocimiento enlazado con la experticia dada por el quehacer pedagógico como actores educati- vos, mismo que nos lleva a dialogar con diversos autores. Además, propone una ruta para ampliar el camino a través de pensadores y corrientes hegemónicas y subalternizadas, desde una vital revisión que recupere los desafíos de las múltiples perspectivas de género y de la mirada sensible sobre una pedagogía crítica (y revolucionaria) de construcción permanente. De ahí que nos refiramos a la poiesis de la pedagogía como el camino para una actividad productiva, fabricativa, amorosa, de integralidad, social, cultural y política; que, a decir de Gabriela Mistral (2017), habrá que asumirla como praxis deliberada que incumbe al pedagogue y le posiciona desde una mirada libre, ética, estética y espiritual.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a02
Yago Paris
The present article analyzes Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentaries The Act of Killing (2012) and The Look of Silence (2014) from the perspective of trauma. The aim of this study is to give new approaches that could allow a deeper understanding of such a complex sociopolitical situation as the one that is taking place in nowadays Indonesia. First, I will introduce the term cultural trauma to explain the situation of the victims of the 1965-66 mass killings that took place in Indonesia. Then, I will make use of the concept of the political taboo to better understand how the official narrative imposed by the government has worked, and still works, as some sort of unquestionable myth. Afterward, I will point out that these two concepts give birth to a vicious cycle from which escaping becomes highly unlikely. A possible solution I propose here comes from studying another type of trauma, that of the perpetrator, since, in an indirect way, it can lead to an improvement of cultural trauma. By approaching trauma in a non-moralistic sense, allowing the perpetrator the status of a victim, I intend to highlight the importance of empathy and understanding in the process of healing of not only perpetrator trauma, but also, and more importantly, cultural trauma.
{"title":"Perpetrator Trauma as a Possible Solution for Cultural Trauma: The Case of Joshua Oppenheimer’s The Act of Killing (2012) and The Look of Silence (2014)","authors":"Yago Paris","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a02","url":null,"abstract":"The present article analyzes Joshua Oppenheimer’s documentaries The Act of Killing (2012) and The Look of Silence (2014) from the perspective of trauma. The aim of this study is to give new approaches that could allow a deeper understanding of such a complex sociopolitical situation as the one that is taking place in nowadays Indonesia. First, I will introduce the term cultural trauma to explain the situation of the victims of the 1965-66 mass killings that took place in Indonesia. Then, I will make use of the concept of the political taboo to better understand how the official narrative imposed by the government has worked, and still works, as some sort of unquestionable myth. Afterward, I will point out that these two concepts give birth to a vicious cycle from which escaping becomes highly unlikely. A possible solution I propose here comes from studying another type of trauma, that of the perpetrator, since, in an indirect way, it can lead to an improvement of cultural trauma. By approaching trauma in a non-moralistic sense, allowing the perpetrator the status of a victim, I intend to highlight the importance of empathy and understanding in the process of healing of not only perpetrator trauma, but also, and more importantly, cultural trauma.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a02
P. Vommaro, L. Rovelli
Diversos debates e iniciativas recientes vuelven a posicionar en un primer plano la necesidad de reforma de la evaluación de la investigación y su mayor ligadura con la sociedad, a partir de una creciente apertura, colaboración y participación en el plano del conocimiento, siguiendo algunos de los principios de transición hacia la ciencia abierta. Lo anterior acarrea múltiples desafíos para el diseño de instrumentos de promoción de la investigación y su evaluación. Tomando como caso una experiencia en el Área de Investigación del Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (Clacso), este artículo se propone describir y analizar los desafíos de la evaluación de la investigación orientada a la movilización del conocimiento, a partir de la configuración de los Grupo de Trabajo del Clacso, con foco en los criterios de la convocatoria 2019-2022. En particular, se exploran las características específicas de los criterios de evaluación involucrados en este programa y sus alcances en relación con la inclusión, apertura, colaboración e interacción con la sociedad. El abordaje es de corte cualitativo y se beneficia de la recolección de datos principalmente documentales relacionados con las bases de la convocatoria a los Grupos de Trabajo 2019-2022, las grillas de evaluación utilizadas y las acciones organizacionales promovidas en torno a algunos de los principios del acceso abierto y la ciencia abierta.
{"title":"Desafíos a la evaluación de la investigación orientada a la movilización del conocimiento en transición hacia la ciencia abierta: un análisis a partir del caso de los Grupos de Trabajo del Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales","authors":"P. Vommaro, L. Rovelli","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a02","url":null,"abstract":"Diversos debates e iniciativas recientes vuelven a posicionar en un primer plano la necesidad de reforma de la evaluación de la investigación y su mayor ligadura con la sociedad, a partir de una creciente apertura, colaboración y participación en el plano del conocimiento, siguiendo algunos de los principios de transición hacia la ciencia abierta. Lo anterior acarrea múltiples desafíos para el diseño de instrumentos de promoción de la investigación y su evaluación. Tomando como caso una experiencia en el Área de Investigación del Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (Clacso), este artículo se propone describir y analizar los desafíos de la evaluación de la investigación orientada a la movilización del conocimiento, a partir de la configuración de los Grupo de Trabajo del Clacso, con foco en los criterios de la convocatoria 2019-2022. En particular, se exploran las características específicas de los criterios de evaluación involucrados en este programa y sus alcances en relación con la inclusión, apertura, colaboración e interacción con la sociedad. El abordaje es de corte cualitativo y se beneficia de la recolección de datos principalmente documentales relacionados con las bases de la convocatoria a los Grupos de Trabajo 2019-2022, las grillas de evaluación utilizadas y las acciones organizacionales promovidas en torno a algunos de los principios del acceso abierto y la ciencia abierta.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a06
Mauro Alonso, D. Perrotta, Guido Riccono
La discusión sobre las contribuciones que hace el conocimiento social al proceso de toma de decisiones de políticas públicas es un tema nodal de la problematización sobre la relación ciencia- Estado y conocimiento-política. La conceptualización de la movilización del conocimiento científico supone una propuesta interesante para la reflexión y problematización de esa compleja relación y ofrece algunos indicios para situar las dinámicas de interacción entre los procesos de producción de conocimiento de las ciencias sociales y los agentes extraacadémicos que pueden apropiarse y usar los resultados de la investigación social. En este trabajo, construyendo sobre aportes previos, discutimos sobre las dinámicas de movilización de conocimiento científico en ciencias sociales, en particular para el campo de la ciencia política, revisitando diversos emergentes analíticos que observan la relación academia-entorno, y presentamos algunas conclusiones de base empírica de un trabajo de campo sobre percepciones de investigadores de las ciencias sociales sobre el proceso de producción de conocimiento, las estrategias y formas de interacción, y los principales usuarios de sus investigaciones. En primer lugar, el trabajo caracteriza el campo regional de la ciencia política y sus dinámicas; en segundo lugar, problematizamos los enfoques teórico-analíticos que analizan la relación entre el modo de producción de conocimiento y sus dinámicas de uso y apropiación social, y, finalmente, la tercera sección introduce los primeros emergentes de base empírica de un estudio en curso sobre las dinámicas de interacción entre investigadores sociales y usuarios extraacadémicos.
{"title":"¿Ayudar al Estado a pensar? Sobre las dinámicas de interacción entre la investigación social y la política","authors":"Mauro Alonso, D. Perrotta, Guido Riccono","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a06","url":null,"abstract":"La discusión sobre las contribuciones que hace el conocimiento social al proceso de toma de decisiones de políticas públicas es un tema nodal de la problematización sobre la relación ciencia- Estado y conocimiento-política. La conceptualización de la movilización del conocimiento científico supone una propuesta interesante para la reflexión y problematización de esa compleja relación y ofrece algunos indicios para situar las dinámicas de interacción entre los procesos de producción de conocimiento de las ciencias sociales y los agentes extraacadémicos que pueden apropiarse y usar los resultados de la investigación social. En este trabajo, construyendo sobre aportes previos, discutimos sobre las dinámicas de movilización de conocimiento científico en ciencias sociales, en particular para el campo de la ciencia política, revisitando diversos emergentes analíticos que observan la relación academia-entorno, y presentamos algunas conclusiones de base empírica de un trabajo de campo sobre percepciones de investigadores de las ciencias sociales sobre el proceso de producción de conocimiento, las estrategias y formas de interacción, y los principales usuarios de sus investigaciones. En primer lugar, el trabajo caracteriza el campo regional de la ciencia política y sus dinámicas; en segundo lugar, problematizamos los enfoques teórico-analíticos que analizan la relación entre el modo de producción de conocimiento y sus dinámicas de uso y apropiación social, y, finalmente, la tercera sección introduce los primeros emergentes de base empírica de un estudio en curso sobre las dinámicas de interacción entre investigadores sociales y usuarios extraacadémicos.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a3
Carlo Comanducci Carlo
This article brings to bear different strands of critical theory on the issue of police violence and securitarian capitalism, with a focus on the current situation in France, discussing Judith Butler’s argument for nonviolence in The Force of Nonviolence in relation to Jacques Rancière’s distinction of politics and police, Giorgio Agamben’s ideas of gesture and act, and Silvia Federici’s understanding of primitive accumulation and reproductive commons. These authors, from their different perspectives, address how the questions of the distribution and the legitimation of violence involve forms of individuation that cut into a common dimension of relationality and interdepen- dency, systematically denying structural violence. On this basis, they understand the ethics and politics of nonviolence to be the matter of a common use of bodies: Butler, in the sense of an aggressive defence of those interrelational bonds that are formative of human subjects; Agamben, in the sense of a shift in our mode of thinking and doing from property and belonging to use and dwelling, as part of the destitution of the biopolitical and juridical capture of lives; Federici, as forms of mutual support organised in a struggle against the imposition of capitalist relations of production and reproduction. Moving from the question of the figuration of violence and the State’s semantic monopoly on its attribution to that of police violence and its centrality in the current paradigm of government, the article connects the various epistemologies of subjectivity in Butler, Agamben, and Federici to the critique of techniques of individuation and structural forms of vulnerabilisation that are characteristic of the police State, proposing an anarchist perspective on nonviolence as part of a larger defence of reproductive and gestural commons.
{"title":"Faceless Violence and the Gestural Commons: The Ethics and Politics of Destitution and Support in Butler, Agamben, and Federici","authors":"Carlo Comanducci Carlo","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a3","url":null,"abstract":"This article brings to bear different strands of critical theory on the issue of police violence and securitarian capitalism, with a focus on the current situation in France, discussing Judith Butler’s argument for nonviolence in The Force of Nonviolence in relation to Jacques Rancière’s distinction of politics and police, Giorgio Agamben’s ideas of gesture and act, and Silvia Federici’s understanding of primitive accumulation and reproductive commons. These authors, from their different perspectives, address how the questions of the distribution and the legitimation of violence involve forms of individuation that cut into a common dimension of relationality and interdepen- dency, systematically denying structural violence. On this basis, they understand the ethics and politics of nonviolence to be the matter of a common use of bodies: Butler, in the sense of an aggressive defence of those interrelational bonds that are formative of human subjects; Agamben, in the sense of a shift in our mode of thinking and doing from property and belonging to use and dwelling, as part of the destitution of the biopolitical and juridical capture of lives; Federici, as forms of mutual support organised in a struggle against the imposition of capitalist relations of production and reproduction. Moving from the question of the figuration of violence and the State’s semantic monopoly on its attribution to that of police violence and its centrality in the current paradigm of government, the article connects the various epistemologies of subjectivity in Butler, Agamben, and Federici to the critique of techniques of individuation and structural forms of vulnerabilisation that are characteristic of the police State, proposing an anarchist perspective on nonviolence as part of a larger defence of reproductive and gestural commons.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v11n21.a07
Illimani Patiño Giraldo
This article sketches the role of state-sponsored violence in the implementation of the Eastern Antioquia hydroelectrical complex between 1964 and 1998. Through an historical analysis based on literature and media review, this paper argues that the ‘development’ strategy conceived by the Antioquia’s elite to meet the growing demand of energy of the Medellín’s industry was imposed on the local population, leading to systematic land appropriation and to forced displacement. Moreover, the persecution of the pacific local grassroot organizations directly triggered a 30-year-long cycle of violence that destroyed the region’s social fabric, while benefiting the interests of the industrial elite of Antioquia.
{"title":"Repression and dispossession in the implementation of the Eastern Antioquia hydroelectrical complex","authors":"Illimani Patiño Giraldo","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v11n21.a07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v11n21.a07","url":null,"abstract":"This article sketches the role of state-sponsored violence in the implementation of the Eastern Antioquia hydroelectrical complex between 1964 and 1998. Through an historical analysis based on literature and media review, this paper argues that the ‘development’ strategy conceived by the Antioquia’s elite to meet the growing demand of energy of the Medellín’s industry was imposed on the local population, leading to systematic land appropriation and to forced displacement. Moreover, the persecution of the pacific local grassroot organizations directly triggered a 30-year-long cycle of violence that destroyed the region’s social fabric, while benefiting the interests of the industrial elite of Antioquia.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a04
José Iran BATISTA DE MELO FILHO, Ezequiel ALVES LOBO, Brenno Buarque, José Leonel PAREJA CREDIDIO
O objetivo do estudo é propor um modelo para construção e validação de uma escala capaz de agrupar preferências ideológicas. Primeiramente, foi proposta uma escala na qual a ideologia é categorizada em três aspectos: civil, moral e econômica. Posteriormente foi realizado o julgamento desta escala por 6 especialistas. Após estas etapas, procedeu-se com a aplicação do questionário que obteve 110 respostas visando a validação da escala, os resultados obtidos do Alfa de Cronbach e dos indicadores da Análise Fatorial Exploratória -AFE se mostraram promissores, após o tratamento da escala. Da AFE resultaram três fatores: Conservado nos Costumes e Liberal na economia; Intervenção e Assistência Estatal e A Esquerda Conservadora, denota-se que dentro dos fatores houve contradição dos indivíduos quanto ao seu posicionamento ideológico. Ademais, Tarouco e Madeira (2013) argumentan, que os partidos carregam suas ideologías, sendo os de esquerdas brelacionados a regulação do mercado, planejamento econômico, economían controlada, analise marxista, expansao do estado de bem estar social e defensa a classe operária; enquanto que os partidos com preferencias ideológicas di ndireita se posicionam com: mencoes positivas as forcas armadas, livre mercado, ortodoxia económica, limitacao ao assitencialismo e referências favoráveis à clase empresarial.
{"title":"Proposta de construção e validação de escala para preferências ideológicas do eleitorado","authors":"José Iran BATISTA DE MELO FILHO, Ezequiel ALVES LOBO, Brenno Buarque, José Leonel PAREJA CREDIDIO","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n23.a04","url":null,"abstract":"O objetivo do estudo é propor um modelo para construção e validação de uma escala capaz de agrupar preferências ideológicas. Primeiramente, foi proposta uma escala na qual a ideologia é categorizada em três aspectos: civil, moral e econômica. Posteriormente foi realizado o julgamento desta escala por 6 especialistas. Após estas etapas, procedeu-se com a aplicação do questionário que obteve 110 respostas visando a validação da escala, os resultados obtidos do Alfa de Cronbach e dos indicadores da Análise Fatorial Exploratória -AFE se mostraram promissores, após o tratamento da escala. Da AFE resultaram três fatores: Conservado nos Costumes e Liberal na economia; Intervenção e Assistência Estatal e A Esquerda Conservadora, denota-se que dentro dos fatores houve contradição dos indivíduos quanto ao seu posicionamento ideológico. Ademais, Tarouco e Madeira (2013) argumentan, que os partidos carregam suas ideologías, sendo os de esquerdas brelacionados a regulação do mercado, planejamento econômico, economían controlada, analise marxista, expansao do estado de bem estar social e defensa a classe operária; enquanto que os partidos com preferencias ideológicas di ndireita se posicionam com: mencoes positivas as forcas armadas, livre mercado, ortodoxia económica, limitacao ao assitencialismo e referências favoráveis à clase empresarial.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a05
Sylwia Chutnik
This article describes the phenomenon of editorial kitsch trends around the Holocaust literature and its impact on the Holocaust memory. "Holo-polo" is a way of dealing with the “discomfort” of the horrors of war and violence, by creating a more comfortable version of it. The article problematizes the ways of representation of a frequently debated and controversial issue, the Holocaust. By analyzing individual publications, the article addresses the issues of memory, forgetting, objectivity and truth of historical representation, and, inevitably, the ethical issue of historical fiction. The article argues that embellishing the history of the Holocaust is not only inappropriate, but also indecent. Instead of describing the horrors of the Holocaust, Holo-polo trivializes and misrepresents its significance, depicting melancholy, sentiment, and nostalgia in the light of a pop-cultural emotional trap. Or maybe is it just being moved by our own emotions. Kitschy clichés are misused and certainly do not serve memory, literature, or respect for Holocaust victims and survivors.
{"title":"Holo-polo, or the sweet tales of the Holocaust","authors":"Sylwia Chutnik","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v12n22.a05","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the phenomenon of editorial kitsch trends around the Holocaust literature and its impact on the Holocaust memory. \"Holo-polo\" is a way of dealing with the “discomfort” of the horrors of war and violence, by creating a more comfortable version of it. The article problematizes the ways of representation of a frequently debated and controversial issue, the Holocaust. By analyzing individual publications, the article addresses the issues of memory, forgetting, objectivity and truth of historical representation, and, inevitably, the ethical issue of historical fiction. The article argues that embellishing the history of the Holocaust is not only inappropriate, but also indecent. Instead of describing the horrors of the Holocaust, Holo-polo trivializes and misrepresents its significance, depicting melancholy, sentiment, and nostalgia in the light of a pop-cultural emotional trap. Or maybe is it just being moved by our own emotions. Kitschy clichés are misused and certainly do not serve memory, literature, or respect for Holocaust victims and survivors.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67495288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：