JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY最新文献

英文中文

Historicizing Modernists: Approaches to "Archivalism," ed. by Matthew Feldman, Anna Svendsen, and Erik Tonning (review) 将现代主义者历史化:“档案主义”的途径，马修·费尔德曼、安娜·斯文森和埃里克·托宁主编(评论)

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905394

Wim van Mierlo

H Modernists is a fascinating collection of essays that looks at a range of modernist authors against the backdrop of their time. The book brings together thirteen essays originally presented at a conference held at the University of York in May 2018 in celebration of the tenth anniversary of the prestigious “Historicizing Modernism” series published by the Bloomsbury Academic Press. As such, the present volume fulfils the same aims as that series: to challenge traditional literary-critical work by drawing on documentary and archival sources with a view to providing fresh intellectual perspectives on the work and methods of modernist writers. The new essays in this volume offer in condensed, but no less rigorous, form what the book series to date has done so well: to genuinely break new ground. That the collection is missing an essay on James Joyce is due no doubt to the luck of the draw that comes with conference volumes like this. Nonetheless, readers of the JJQ will not be disappointed by the rich pickings on offer. Aside from two contributions on Virginia Woolf and two on Ezra Pound, there are essays on Gertrude Stein, T. S. Eliot, Samuel Beckett, David Jones, and Katherine Mansfield, on two queer late modernists, Charles Henri Ford and Richard Bruce Nugent, and on the critic Q. D. Leavis. What the volume amply demonstrates is how modernist authors are “historicized,” whether this is in literary-critical, biographical, or practical-editorial terms. Using untapped correspondence at the Beinecke Library, Svetlana Ehtee shows just how deeply embroiled Pound was with Nazi and Fascist figures, while Alec Marsh scrutinizes the letters Pound exchanged with the Fascist poet Olivia Rossetti Agresti (a relative of William and Dante Gabriel Rossetti) to discover that the “esoteric surface of The Cantos” actually hides a “hard, activist core” that cannot easily be explained away by Pound’s apologists (88). Jonas Kurlberg, too, uses a biographical approach in his analysis of Eliot’s involvement with a group called the Moot who were creating, in the 1930s and 1940s, the intellectual foundations for a Christian cultural revolution. His is an important contribution to the understanding of Eliot’s Anglo-Catholicism, which largely remains in need of specific historical contextualization. Natasha Periyan, by contrast, has written an excellent and subtly argued analysis of the “biopolitics” of intelligence and sentiment in Mrs Dalloway, by which she means the political discourses concerned with “optimizing the ‘aptitudes’ of the population” (53).1

《现代主义》是一本引人入胜的散文集，在他们的时代背景下审视了一系列现代主义作家。这本书汇集了13篇文章，这些文章最初是在2018年5月在约克大学举行的一次会议上发表的，该会议是为了庆祝布卢姆斯伯里学术出版社出版的著名的“现代主义历史化”系列十周年。因此，本卷实现了与该系列相同的目标:挑战传统的文学批评工作，利用文献和档案资源，以期为现代主义作家的工作和方法提供新的知识视角。本卷中的新文章虽简明扼要，但同样严谨，构成了该系列迄今为止所做的出色工作:真正开辟新天地。这本合集缺少一篇关于詹姆斯·乔伊斯的文章，无疑是由于像这样的会议卷所带来的抽奖运气。尽管如此，JJQ的读者不会对提供的丰富选择感到失望。除了两篇关于弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫和两篇关于埃兹拉·庞德的文章外，还有关于格特鲁德·斯坦、t·s·艾略特、塞缪尔·贝克特、大卫·琼斯和凯瑟琳·曼斯菲尔德的文章，关于两位古怪的晚期现代主义者查尔斯·亨利·福特和理查德·布鲁斯·纽金特的文章，以及关于评论家q·d·里维斯的文章。这本书充分展示了现代主义作家是如何被“历史化”的，无论是在文学批评、传记还是实用编辑方面。Svetlana Ehtee利用在Beinecke图书馆未公开的信件，展示了庞德与纳粹和法西斯人物的深度纠缠，而Alec Marsh仔细研究了庞德与法西斯诗人Olivia Rossetti Agresti(威廉和但丁Gabriel Rossetti的亲戚)的往来信件，发现“《诗章》的深奥表面实际上隐藏着庞德的辩护人无法轻易解释的“坚硬的、积极的核心”(88)。乔纳斯·科尔伯格(Jonas Kurlberg)在分析艾略特与一个名为Moot的团体的关系时，也采用了传记的方法。这个团体在20世纪30年代和40年代为基督教文化革命奠定了知识基础。这是对艾略特的盎格鲁天主教的理解的重要贡献，这在很大程度上仍需要具体的历史语境化。相比之下，娜塔莎·佩里扬(Natasha Periyan)对《达洛维夫人》中智力和情感的“生命政治”进行了出色而巧妙的分析，她指的是与“优化人口的‘才能’”有关的政治话语(53)

{"title":"Historicizing Modernists: Approaches to \"Archivalism,\" ed. by Matthew Feldman, Anna Svendsen, and Erik Tonning (review)","authors":"Wim van Mierlo","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a905394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a905394","url":null,"abstract":"H Modernists is a fascinating collection of essays that looks at a range of modernist authors against the backdrop of their time. The book brings together thirteen essays originally presented at a conference held at the University of York in May 2018 in celebration of the tenth anniversary of the prestigious “Historicizing Modernism” series published by the Bloomsbury Academic Press. As such, the present volume fulfils the same aims as that series: to challenge traditional literary-critical work by drawing on documentary and archival sources with a view to providing fresh intellectual perspectives on the work and methods of modernist writers. The new essays in this volume offer in condensed, but no less rigorous, form what the book series to date has done so well: to genuinely break new ground. That the collection is missing an essay on James Joyce is due no doubt to the luck of the draw that comes with conference volumes like this. Nonetheless, readers of the JJQ will not be disappointed by the rich pickings on offer. Aside from two contributions on Virginia Woolf and two on Ezra Pound, there are essays on Gertrude Stein, T. S. Eliot, Samuel Beckett, David Jones, and Katherine Mansfield, on two queer late modernists, Charles Henri Ford and Richard Bruce Nugent, and on the critic Q. D. Leavis. What the volume amply demonstrates is how modernist authors are “historicized,” whether this is in literary-critical, biographical, or practical-editorial terms. Using untapped correspondence at the Beinecke Library, Svetlana Ehtee shows just how deeply embroiled Pound was with Nazi and Fascist figures, while Alec Marsh scrutinizes the letters Pound exchanged with the Fascist poet Olivia Rossetti Agresti (a relative of William and Dante Gabriel Rossetti) to discover that the “esoteric surface of The Cantos” actually hides a “hard, activist core” that cannot easily be explained away by Pound’s apologists (88). Jonas Kurlberg, too, uses a biographical approach in his analysis of Eliot’s involvement with a group called the Moot who were creating, in the 1930s and 1940s, the intellectual foundations for a Christian cultural revolution. His is an important contribution to the understanding of Eliot’s Anglo-Catholicism, which largely remains in need of specific historical contextualization. Natasha Periyan, by contrast, has written an excellent and subtly argued analysis of the “biopolitics” of intelligence and sentiment in Mrs Dalloway, by which she means the political discourses concerned with “optimizing the ‘aptitudes’ of the population” (53).1","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"60 1","pages":"409 - 411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44895401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Current JJ Checklist (146) 现行JJ清单(146)

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905376

W. Brockman

We bid a congratulatory farewell to the James Joyce Broadsheet after its publication of 123 issues and welcome the revived James Joyce Literary Supplement. Thanks to our contributors: Sabrina Alonso, Armağan Ekici, Patrick O’Neill, Friedhelm Rathjen, Fritz Senn, Ira Torresi, Dirk Vanderbeke, and especially to Sam Slote for finding the Italian non-translation of Ulysses. The entire retrospective James Joyce Checklist, available online, compiles citations from earlier issues of JJQ and provides extensive coverage of editions, criticism and research dating back to Joyce’s lifetime. This resource is available at https:// norman.hrc.utexas.edu/jamesjoycechecklist/. Please send contributions or suggestions to your bibliographer at w.s.brockman@gmail. com.

我们向发行123期的《詹姆斯·乔伊斯大报》表示祝贺，欢迎《詹姆斯·乔伊斯文学副刊》的复刊。感谢我们的贡献者:Sabrina Alonso, Armağan Ekici, Patrick O 'Neill, Friedhelm Rathjen, Fritz Senn, Ira Torresi, Dirk Vanderbeke，特别是Sam Slote找到了《尤利西斯》的意大利语非翻译版本。完整的詹姆斯·乔伊斯回顾清单(James Joyce Checklist)可在线获取，收录了《JJQ》早期期刊的引文，并提供了可追溯到乔伊斯一生的版本、批评和研究的广泛报道。此资源可从https:// norman.hrc.utexas.edu/jamesjoycechecklist/获得。请将意见或建议发送给您的参考书目编纂者w.s.brockman@gmail。com。

引用次数: 0

Hope, Form, and Future in the Work of James Joyce by David P. Rando (review) 大卫·P·兰多《詹姆斯·乔伊斯作品中的希望、形式与未来》（综述）

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905392

Margot Norris

引用次数: 0

We'll Always Have Parricide: Remembering Mark Wollaeger 我们永远都会有杀Parr事件：纪念Mark Wollaeger

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905384

Paul K. Saint-Amour

引用次数: 0

A Profile and Remembrance of J. Howard Woolmer (1929-2022): Gentleman, Scholar, and Bookdealer Extraordinaire 霍华德·伍尔默（1929-2022）简介与纪念：杰出的绅士、学者和书商

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905386

R. Gerber

引用次数: 0

Stephen's Telescopic Imagination: Geography, Astronomy, and Spatial Analytics in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man 斯蒂芬的望远镜想象:年轻艺术家肖像中的地理学、天文学和空间分析

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905373

J. Hall

ABSTRACT:This essay considers possible sources for Stephen's list of coordinates in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, suggesting that an intertext with the work of English astronomer Sir Joseph Norman Lockyer (1836-1920) provides not only a credible template but also a mode of imaginative "telescoping" that enables Stephen to develop imaginative "flight" as a complement to empirical, terrestrial observation and experience.

摘要:本文探讨了斯蒂芬在《青年艺术家肖像》中坐标表的可能来源，认为与英国天文学家约瑟夫·诺曼·洛克耶爵士(1836-1920)作品的互文不仅提供了一个可信的模板，而且提供了一种想象的“望远镜”模式，使斯蒂芬能够发展想象的“飞行”，作为对经验、地面观察和经验的补充。

引用次数: 0

The "Novelistic Wing of Human Rights": James Joyce, Roger Casement, and Hannah Arendt “人权的小说之翼”:詹姆斯·乔伊斯、罗杰·凯斯门特和汉娜·阿伦特

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2023.a905380

L. Gibbons

ABSTRACT:In Ulysses, the universalism of Homer's Odyssey is not conceived as an abstract model or formal allegory but is reworked in terms of Irish historical links with the Levant and North Africa, not just the European legacy of classical Greece. In a related manner, the universalism of human rights espoused by the Irish revolutionary Roger Casement to condemn atrocities in the Congo and Putumayo region of the Amazon was considered not in abstract terms but in relation to the ethical memory of Ireland's own "nightmare of history." For Hannah Arendt, such forms of "entailed inheritance" were the basis of human rights, but whereas she looked to rights to curtail oppressors in "civilized" societies, Casement extended rights to the oppressed themselves, decolonizing, like Joyce, the very language of civility.

摘要:在《尤利西斯》中，荷马史诗《奥德赛》的普遍主义并没有被视为抽象的模式或正式的寓言，而是根据爱尔兰与黎凡特和北非的历史联系进行了重新设计，而不仅仅是古典希腊的欧洲遗产。与此相关的是，爱尔兰革命家罗杰·凯斯门特(Roger Casement)为谴责刚果和亚马逊普图马约地区(Putumayo)的暴行而倡导的人权普世主义，也不是抽象的，而是与爱尔兰自己的“历史噩梦”的伦理记忆有关。对于汉娜·阿伦特来说，这种形式的“附带继承”是人权的基础，但她在“文明”社会中寻求权利来限制压迫者，而凯斯门特则将权利扩展到被压迫者自己身上，像乔伊斯一样，去殖民化了文明的语言。

引用次数: 0

Modernism, Empire, World Literature by Joe Cleary (review) 乔·克利里的《现代主义，帝国，世界文学》（综述）

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2022.0035

Christopher Gogwilt

J Cleary’s rich new reading of anglophone modernism offers a kind of expert guided tour of canonical texts of anglophone modernism: The Golden Bowl and The Waste Land (chapter 3), Ulysses (chapter 4), The Great Gatsby and Long Day’s Journey Into Night (chapter 5), and Omeros (chapter 6). The first two chapters chart the theoretical and historical itinerary subsequent chapters then explore with close attention to key passages in these texts. Making use of Pascale Casanova’s sense of the “world [literary] system” (with a few important qualifications and adjustments), the overall argument, mapped by the three keywords of the title, shows us the way “modernism” consolidated its claim to “world literature” through the shifting coordinates of “empire” as Europe’s cultural capital moved from London to New York.1 As Cleary explains in the first chapter: “‘Modernism’ is the name we now assign to that new aesthetic code through which the transformation in English letters that shifted Anglophone literary supremacy from London to New York was effected” (15). The book’s guided tour of anglophone modernism depends, however, on an important detour through Irish peripheries. And it is this double focus—on American and Irish challenges to the British—that makes for the book’s most interesting twists and turns. In certain ways, Cleary’s Irish emphasis repeats a key part of Casanova’s argument in The World Republic of Letters: that it is the Irish who set a precedent for those “subversive reworkings” that “enable writers on the periphery . . . to take part in international competition” (328). Yet Cleary underscores an ambivalence about this Irish precedence that is both compelling and, at the same time, riddling: compelling because anglophone modernism does lean so heavily on Irish writers (W. B. Yeats and James Joyce offering only the most noticeable profiles); riddling, because American and Irish challenges to British dominance are premised on very different equations of cultural capital to political power. As Cleary puts it, “whereas the Americans took over from the British in running a world empire, the Irish broke with an empire and had the audacity to establish their own state and to cultivate a literature of some distinction in its own right” (3). This double-vision of anglophone modernism in the service of empire-building and empire-dismantling emerges as much from the economic, intellectual, and political overview of the book (laid out mostly in the first two chapters) as it does from the fine-grained attention to individual literary works. What is important, if also riddling, is the fact that the Irish and

J Cleary对英语现代主义的丰富新阅读提供了一种专家指导的英语现代主义经典文本之旅：《金碗与荒原》（第3章）、《尤利西斯》（第4章）、“了不起的盖茨比与漫漫长夜之旅”（第5章）和《奥梅罗斯》（第6章）。前两章绘制了理论和历史路线图，随后的章节则对这些文本中的关键段落进行了仔细的探索。利用帕斯卡尔·卡萨诺瓦对“世界[文学]体系”的理解（有一些重要的限定和调整），通过标题的三个关键词映射出整体论点，向我们展示了随着欧洲文化之都从伦敦转移到纽约，“现代主义”如何通过“帝国”的坐标转换来巩固其对“世界文学”的主张。1正如克利里在第一章中所解释的那样：“‘现代主义’是我们现在赋予这一新美学准则的名称，通过它，英语字母的转变将英语文学的霸主地位从伦敦转移到了纽约”（15）。然而，这本书对英语现代主义的引导之旅取决于对爱尔兰周边地区的一条重要迂回。正是这种双重关注——美国和爱尔兰对英国的挑战——使这本书出现了最有趣的曲折。在某些方面，克利里对爱尔兰人的强调重复了卡萨诺瓦在《世界文学共和国》中的论点的一个关键部分：正是爱尔兰人为那些“颠覆性的重新创作”开创了先例，“使边缘作家……能够参与国际竞争”（328）。然而，克利里强调了一种对爱尔兰优先权的矛盾心理，这种矛盾心理既令人信服，又令人困惑：令人信服是因为英语现代主义确实非常依赖爱尔兰作家（叶芝和詹姆斯·乔伊斯只提供了最引人注目的简介）；因为美国和爱尔兰对英国统治地位的挑战是以文化资本与政治权力截然不同的等式为前提的。正如克利里所说，“尽管美国人在管理一个世界帝国时接替了英国人，但爱尔兰人却与一个帝国决裂，大胆地建立了自己的国家，并凭借自己的力量培养了一种与众不同的文学”（3）。这种为帝国建设和帝国解体服务的英语现代主义的双重愿景，既来自于对个别文学作品的细致关注，也来自于本书的经济、知识和政治概述（主要在前两章中阐述）。重要的是，爱尔兰人和

{"title":"Modernism, Empire, World Literature by Joe Cleary (review)","authors":"Christopher Gogwilt","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2022.0035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0035","url":null,"abstract":"J Cleary’s rich new reading of anglophone modernism offers a kind of expert guided tour of canonical texts of anglophone modernism: The Golden Bowl and The Waste Land (chapter 3), Ulysses (chapter 4), The Great Gatsby and Long Day’s Journey Into Night (chapter 5), and Omeros (chapter 6). The first two chapters chart the theoretical and historical itinerary subsequent chapters then explore with close attention to key passages in these texts. Making use of Pascale Casanova’s sense of the “world [literary] system” (with a few important qualifications and adjustments), the overall argument, mapped by the three keywords of the title, shows us the way “modernism” consolidated its claim to “world literature” through the shifting coordinates of “empire” as Europe’s cultural capital moved from London to New York.1 As Cleary explains in the first chapter: “‘Modernism’ is the name we now assign to that new aesthetic code through which the transformation in English letters that shifted Anglophone literary supremacy from London to New York was effected” (15). The book’s guided tour of anglophone modernism depends, however, on an important detour through Irish peripheries. And it is this double focus—on American and Irish challenges to the British—that makes for the book’s most interesting twists and turns. In certain ways, Cleary’s Irish emphasis repeats a key part of Casanova’s argument in The World Republic of Letters: that it is the Irish who set a precedent for those “subversive reworkings” that “enable writers on the periphery . . . to take part in international competition” (328). Yet Cleary underscores an ambivalence about this Irish precedence that is both compelling and, at the same time, riddling: compelling because anglophone modernism does lean so heavily on Irish writers (W. B. Yeats and James Joyce offering only the most noticeable profiles); riddling, because American and Irish challenges to British dominance are premised on very different equations of cultural capital to political power. As Cleary puts it, “whereas the Americans took over from the British in running a world empire, the Irish broke with an empire and had the audacity to establish their own state and to cultivate a literature of some distinction in its own right” (3). This double-vision of anglophone modernism in the service of empire-building and empire-dismantling emerges as much from the economic, intellectual, and political overview of the book (laid out mostly in the first two chapters) as it does from the fine-grained attention to individual literary works. What is important, if also riddling, is the fact that the Irish and","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"59 1","pages":"713 - 716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42760002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Current JJ Checklist (144) 现行JJ清单(144)

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2022.0029

W. Brockman

We remember Tom Staley, who, as former Director of the Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin, provided the impetus for digitizing and hosting the “Checklist.” Our thanks to contributors to this number of the “Current Checklist”: Mary Adams, Sabrina Alonso, Valérie Bénéjam, Sheelagh Bevan, Kazuhiro Doki, Richard Gerber, Vincent Golden, Onno Kosters, Patrick O’Neill, and Fritz Senn. The entire retrospective James Joyce Checklist compiles citations from earlier issues of the JJQ and other resources, providing extensive coverage of editions, criticism and research dating back to Joyce’s lifetime. This resource is available at . Please send contributions or suggestions to your bibliographer at w.s.brockman@gmail.com.

我们记得Tom Staley，他曾担任德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校Harry Ransom中心的主任，为“检查表”的数字化和托管提供了动力。我们感谢“当前检查表”中的贡献者：Mary Adams、Sabrina Alonso、Valérie Bénéjam、Sheelagh Bevan、Kazuhiro Doki、Richard Gerber、Vincent Golden、Onno Kosters、Patrick O'Neill，和Fritz Senn。整个回顾性的詹姆斯·乔伊斯清单汇集了《JJQ》早期期刊和其他资源的引文，广泛报道了乔伊斯一生的版本、批评和研究。此资源位于。请将稿件或建议发送给您的目录学家，网址为w.s.brockman@gmail.com.

引用次数: 0

Irish Literature in Transition, 1880-1940 ed. by Marjorie Elizabeth Howes (review) 转型中的爱尔兰文学，1880-1940，作者:马乔里·伊丽莎白·豪斯

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1353/jjq.2022.0036

Erika Mihálycsa

“world literature” emerges. It is not entirely clear how this profile of the critic within the canonical text relates to those “critics of the center” against whom Casanova’s The World Republic of Letters seeks to liberate the “deprived and dominated writers on the periphery of the literary world” (355). In the double vision of Cleary’s American and Irish appropriations of modernism, the critic is simultaneously a critic of the center and a critic from the periphery. Modernism, Empire, World Literature tends toward the conservative side of its ambivalent grasp of anglophone modernism. From this perspective, the great modernist revolutions in form live on only through their appropriation by empire and as monuments to empire’s claim to civilization. From another perspective, though, those monuments themselves bear the linguistic, literary, and cultural traces of a revolutionary destabilization of empire. Cleary leaves us still wanting to find the right balance between the idealistic championing of modernism’s revolutionary peripheries and the melancholic regret for modernism’s role in monumentalizing empire in art.

“世界文学”应运而生。目前还不完全清楚，在规范文本中，评论家的这种形象与卡萨诺瓦的《世界文学共和国》（the World Republic of Letters）试图解放“文学世界边缘被剥夺和支配的作家”（355）的那些“中心评论家”有何联系。在克利里对美国和爱尔兰现代主义的双重阐释中，批评家既是中心的批评家，又是边缘的批评家。现代主义、帝国主义、世界文学在其对英语现代主义的矛盾把握中倾向于保守的一面。从这个角度来看，伟大的现代主义革命只有在被帝国侵占的情况下才能继续存在，并成为帝国对文明主张的纪念碑。然而，从另一个角度来看，这些纪念碑本身带有帝国革命不稳定的语言、文学和文化痕迹。克利里让我们仍然想在对现代主义革命边缘的理想主义支持和对现代主义在纪念艺术帝国中所起作用的忧郁遗憾之间找到正确的平衡。

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀