{"title":"131. Jahresversammlung des Vereins für Niederdeutsche Sprachforschung mit einem schwerpunkt „Namenkunde“ Kiel, 21.–24.05.2018","authors":"Brigitte Ganswindt","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The expression Frankisch refers in German language thought of the 17th and 18th centuries to French, German, High German, Central German and West Central German. Important aspects of linguistic reflection are the relationship between sound and writing, initial stages of an early medieval literary language, the position between low and upper German, and a function as a model of a German literary language.
{"title":"Fränkisch im Deutschen Sprachdenken des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts","authors":"T. Roelcke","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0003","url":null,"abstract":"The expression Frankisch refers in German language thought of the 17th and 18th centuries to French, German, High German, Central German and West Central German. Important aspects of linguistic reflection are the relationship between sound and writing, initial stages of an early medieval literary language, the position between low and upper German, and a function as a model of a German literary language.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The following paper presents an analysis of the use of ge -Prefix in dialects of German for the formation of the past participle. In order to address the issue of prefixation in West Central German, I have compared two sources of dialect data. First, I have consulted Wenker surveys from the late 19th century and secondly, I have consulted the “Mittelrheinischer Sprachatlas”, which collected a variety of dialect data from around 1980. The pattern of prefixation that emerges from these data shows that West Central German prefixation has preserved the historical German system of not using a prefix in the past participial forms of inherently “perfective” verbs such as finden, kommen, treffen, werden and bringen , though the numbers differ for individual verbs into the 19th century. In the 20th century in these varieties, the pattern appears to be moving away from the “perfective” system towards a new system of prefixation, whereby all past participles get a prefix, except velar-initial verbal roots. Thus, forms such as the participle of geben are majority prefixless, but the participle of bringen is majority prefixed. Furthermore, these prefixation patterns can be seen to define differences between Ripuarian, which mostly retains the old prefixless past participles without much addition, Moselle Franconian, which adds more velar-initial roots to the prefixless group and Rhine Franconian, which generally removes the category of prefixless past participles from the language.
{"title":"Prefixless Past Participles in West Central German: Phonology or Perfective Aspect?","authors":"David J. Bolter","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0011","url":null,"abstract":"The following paper presents an analysis of the use of ge -Prefix in dialects of German for the formation of the past participle. In order to address the issue of prefixation in West Central German, I have compared two sources of dialect data. First, I have consulted Wenker surveys from the late 19th century and secondly, I have consulted the “Mittelrheinischer Sprachatlas”, which collected a variety of dialect data from around 1980. The pattern of prefixation that emerges from these data shows that West Central German prefixation has preserved the historical German system of not using a prefix in the past participial forms of inherently “perfective” verbs such as finden, kommen, treffen, werden and bringen , though the numbers differ for individual verbs into the 19th century. In the 20th century in these varieties, the pattern appears to be moving away from the “perfective” system towards a new system of prefixation, whereby all past participles get a prefix, except velar-initial verbal roots. Thus, forms such as the participle of geben are majority prefixless, but the participle of bringen is majority prefixed. Furthermore, these prefixation patterns can be seen to define differences between Ripuarian, which mostly retains the old prefixless past participles without much addition, Moselle Franconian, which adds more velar-initial roots to the prefixless group and Rhine Franconian, which generally removes the category of prefixless past participles from the language.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69229142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Alexander Werth für inhaltliche Hinweise und Anregungen.","authors":"S. Kasper, Jeffrey Pheiff","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present paper uncovers a fundamental distinction between the intonation of Valais German (VG) and that of Midland Swiss German (MSG): Statements in VG are mainly composed of L+M*+H-accents. Such three-level pitch accents have not been described for any variety of German. MSG uses two-level pitch accents instead, Bernese German (BG), for instance, L+H*. The difference between VG and BG may be schematized as follows:
{"title":"Eine Eigenheit der Walliserdeutschen Intonation: Default L+M*+H in Aussagesätzen","authors":"Marius Zemp","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0009","url":null,"abstract":"The present paper uncovers a fundamental distinction between the intonation of Valais German (VG) and that of Midland Swiss German (MSG): Statements in VG are mainly composed of L+M*+H-accents. Such three-level pitch accents have not been described for any variety of German. MSG uses two-level pitch accents instead, Bernese German (BG), for instance, L+H*. The difference between VG and BG may be schematized as follows:","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper deals with the emergence of a complex demonstrative pronoun in Rhine and Moselle Franconian, reinforced by a DP internal local adverb (e.g. der doo Ardiggel ‘that there article’). The grammaticalization process started out from the pronominal or anaphoric use of the demonstrative. Only in this case the demonstrative and the reinforcer are adjacent and formal mechanisms of grammaticalization can take effect.
本文研究了莱茵和摩泽尔法语中一个复杂指示代词的出现，该代词由一个DP内部局部副词加强(例如der doo Ardiggel ' that there article ')。语法化过程开始于指示代词或回指用法。只有在这种情况下，指示语和强化语是相邻的，语法化的形式机制才能发挥作用。
{"title":"Vunn dem doo Ardiggel bin ich ganz bibb.","authors":"Philipp Rauth, A. Speyer","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2018-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2018-0002","url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the emergence of a complex demonstrative pronoun in Rhine and Moselle Franconian, reinforced by a DP internal local adverb (e.g. der doo Ardiggel ‘that there article’). The grammaticalization process started out from the pronominal or anaphoric use of the demonstrative. Only in this case the demonstrative and the reinforcer are adjacent and formal mechanisms of grammaticalization can take effect.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dieser Aufsatz diskutiert die Frage, inwieweit Unserdeutsch sich aus soziohistorischer und sprachstruktureller Perspektive in die Kategorie Kreolsprache einftigt. Als tertium comparationis dienen dabei Merkmale, die in der einschlagigen Literatur prominent als charakteristisch fur Kreolsprachen angenommen werden. Es zeigt sich, dass Unserdeutsch trotz einer Reihe atypischer Entstehungsumstande, die auf den ersten Blick eine grose strukturelle Nahe zum deutschen Superstrat, damit ein relativ akrolektales Kreol erwarten liesen, verhaltnismasig gut mit dem Muster eines Average Creole, wie es sich etwa aufgrund der Daten des "Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures" (MrcunElrs et al. 2013) abzeichnet, harmoniert. Eine mogliche Erklarung findet diese augenfIillige Diskrepanz in der primaren Funktion von Unserdeutsch als Identitatsmarker und der linguistischen Struktur seiner Substratsprache Tok Pisin.
{"title":"Unserdeutsch: Ein (A)Typisches Kreol?","authors":"Péter Maitz, S. Lindenfelser","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.131907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.131907","url":null,"abstract":"Dieser Aufsatz diskutiert die Frage, inwieweit Unserdeutsch sich aus soziohistorischer und sprachstruktureller Perspektive in die Kategorie Kreolsprache einftigt. Als tertium comparationis dienen dabei Merkmale, die in der einschlagigen Literatur prominent als charakteristisch fur Kreolsprachen angenommen werden. Es zeigt sich, dass Unserdeutsch trotz einer Reihe atypischer Entstehungsumstande, die auf den ersten Blick eine grose strukturelle Nahe zum deutschen Superstrat, damit ein relativ akrolektales Kreol erwarten liesen, verhaltnismasig gut mit dem Muster eines Average Creole, wie es sich etwa aufgrund der Daten des \"Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures\" (MrcunElrs et al. 2013) abzeichnet, harmoniert. Eine mogliche Erklarung findet diese augenfIillige Diskrepanz in der primaren Funktion von Unserdeutsch als Identitatsmarker und der linguistischen Struktur seiner Substratsprache Tok Pisin.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71357716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Code-mixing, regarded as a characteristic feature of fluent bilingual speech, has been investigated from various perspectives. This article argues for a usage-based approach to code-mixing as a unified theoretical framework, which is capable of integrating the multitude of existing explanations for this phenomenon and of yielding new insights into its structure. Under a usage-based view, linguistic knowledge emerges in language use, which is grounded in social interaction and is affected by cognitive processing. The aspects of human cognition explored in the present article as factors influencing the structure of code-mixing include the perception of similarity between the contact languages’ elements and structures, the frequency of linguistic units in language use and their recency in discourse. I demonstrate that the perception of similarity between the contact languages’ elements and structures opens up possibilities for code-mixing, whereas the frequency and recency of linguistic units influence the probability of their use in code-mixing.
{"title":"Ein Gebrauchsbasierter Ansatz zur Analyse von Code-Mixing","authors":"Nikolay Hakimov","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2017-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2017-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Code-mixing, regarded as a characteristic feature of fluent bilingual speech, has been investigated from various perspectives. This article argues for a usage-based approach to code-mixing as a unified theoretical framework, which is capable of integrating the multitude of existing explanations for this phenomenon and of yielding new insights into its structure. Under a usage-based view, linguistic knowledge emerges in language use, which is grounded in social interaction and is affected by cognitive processing. The aspects of human cognition explored in the present article as factors influencing the structure of code-mixing include the perception of similarity between the contact languages’ elements and structures, the frequency of linguistic units in language use and their recency in discourse. I demonstrate that the perception of similarity between the contact languages’ elements and structures opens up possibilities for code-mixing, whereas the frequency and recency of linguistic units influence the probability of their use in code-mixing.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69228651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：