Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists最新文献

Background

This study investigates characteristics of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) use by surveying a sample of international orthodontists. Furthermore, the survey investigates the stability, insertion technique, and failure rate of TADs and professionals’ experience in residency, and it also attempts to establish guidelines for its use in everyday practice.

Methods

A 19-question survey was sent to orthodontists worldwide asking opinion-based, case-specific, and placement technique questions regarding TADs. Results were collected from 251 survey respondents. The country/regions of practice and length of time practicing orthodontics were the independent variables.

Results

Survey respondents indicated that most orthodontists rarely or sporadically use TADs. Significant differences were also found for TAD utilization purposes, sizes, and placement techniques among different countries/regions and for failure rates (1 or more of the last 6 TADs placed failed—61.6%). A significant difference was found in how many TADs orthodontists placed in residency versus private practice (56% vs. 15%) in relation to how long they have been practicing, but it did not greatly affect the frequency of use, mechanics, or placement technique.

Conclusions

The frequency of TAD use is similar in many different countries and among different age groups. Although the collected responses suggested significant differences among respondents from different countries, the variability of results for TAD use worldwide prevent the establishment of clear guidelines.

Background

The objective of this study was to assess the soft and hard tissue cephalometric indexes of facial profiles perceived as attractive.

Methods

A total of 360 individuals (180 females and 180 males) with well-balanced faces and no history of orthodontic or cosmetic procedures were selected. Twenty-six raters (13 females and 13 males) rated the attractiveness of profile view photographs of the enrolled individuals. According to the total score, the rated top 10% of photographs were selected as attractive. Overall, 81 (40 soft tissue and 41 hard tissue) cephalometric measurements were made on traced cephalograms of the attractive faces. The obtained values were compared with orthodontic norms and attractive Whites using Bonferroni-corrected t tests. They were also analyzed regarding age and sex effects using a two-way ANOVA test.

Results

Significant differences were found between the cephalometric measurements of attractive profiles and orthodontic norms. Among the most important parameters were greater H angle and basic upper lip thickness in attractive males, and greater facial convexity and smaller nose prominence in attractive females. Also, attractive male participants had greater soft tissue chin thickness and subnasale perpendicular to the upper lip compared with attractive females.

Conclusions

According to the results, males with a normal profile and thicker protruded upper lips were perceived as more attractive. Also, females with a slightly convex profile, deeper mentolabial sulcus, less prominent nose, and shorter maxilla and mandible were perceived as more attractive.

Background

Introducing three-dimensional (3D) printing has opened new visions in the orthodontic field. This research evaluates three-dimensionally produced orthodontic retainers and their future possible uses. For this purpose, in vitro tests were performed for these groups, including bond strength, failure analysis, discoloration, and biodegradation.

Methods

A total of 30 specimens (n = 30), lower incisor human teeth, were randomly divided into three groups for a bond strength failure analysis (for each group n = 10). In the experimental groups, lingual retainers were fabricated using 3D systems (group 1 with 3D dental pen and group 2 with 3D-printed). In the control group (group 3), the retainer system was a combination of a wire and composite, which is being used worldwide. A total of 30 specimens (n = 30) from the 3D dental pen and 3D-printed for discoloration and biodegradation tests were divided into three groups (water, tea, and coffee). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA, and chi-square test.

Results

For all parameters tested, significant differences were determined among groups. The 3D pen group had the highest score for bond strength, whereas discoloration differed significantly.

Conclusions

According to the limitations of this research, 3D-printed retainers have the potential for clinical use in the near future.

Background

The influence of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 administration method through telephone or face-to-face interviews in orthosurgical patients is unknown. The study aims to assess the reliability of the OHIP-14 questionnaire through its stability and internal consistency when applied through a telephone interview compared with a face-to-face interview.

Methods

A total of 21 orthosurgical patients were selected to compare the scores obtained in OHIP-14. The interview was carried out by telephone, and 2 weeks later, the patient was invited to attend a face-to-face interview. Stability was verified by Cohen's kappa coefficient with quadratic weighting for individual items and intraclass correlation coefficient for the total OHIP-14 score. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale and its seven subscales.

Results

Items 5 and 6 showed reasonable agreement in the two modes of administration; 4 and 14 moderate; 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, and 13 substantial; and items 2, 8, 10, and 12 showed almost perfect agreement, according to the Cohen's kappa coefficient test. The instrument's internal consistency was better in the face-to-face interview (0.89) than it was in the telephone interview (0.85). For the evaluation of the seven OHIP-14 subscales, differences were found in functional limitations, psychological discomfort, and social disadvantage subscales.

Conclusions

Although there were some differences in OHIP-14 subscales between the interview methods, the total score of the questionnaire showed good stability and internal consistency. The telephone method can be a reliable alternative for the application of the OHIP-14 questionnaire in orthosurgical patients.

Background

This study aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic classification of pubertal growth spurts using cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) staging based on the lateral cephalograms of an Iranian subpopulation.

Material and Methods

Cephalometric radiographs were collected from 1846 eligible patients (aged 5–18 years) referred to the orthodontic department of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. These images were labeled by two experienced orthodontists. Two scenarios, including two- and three-class (pubertal growth spurts using CVM), were considered as the output for the classification task. The cropped image of the second to fourth cervical vertebrae was used as input to the network. After the preprocessing, the augmentation step, and hyperparameter tuning, the networks were trained with initial random weighting and transfer learning. Finally, the best architecture among the different architectures was determined based on the accuracy and F-score criteria.

Results

The CNN based on the ConvNeXtBase-296 architecture had the highest accuracy for automatically assessing pubertal growth spurts based on CVM staging in both three-class (82% accuracy) and two-class (93% accuracy) scenarios. Given the limited amount of data available for training the target networks for most of the architectures in use, transfer learning improves predictive performance.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the potential of CNNs as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for intelligent assessment of skeletal maturation staging with high accuracy even with a relatively small number of images. Considering the development of orthodontic science toward digitalization, the development of such intelligent decision systems is proposed.

Advanced dental education programs in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics require an extensive and comprehensive evidence-based experience, which must be representative of the current didactic and technical advancements. Over the past 25 years, the World Federation of Orthodontists (WFO) has placed emphasis in the support for the recognized orthodontic specialty training programs in every region of the world. In its early years, the WFO developed general principles for specialty education that culminated in the first comprehensive curriculum recommendations, i.e., the WFO Guidelines for Postgraduate Orthodontic Education, which was published in February 2009. In view of the significant changes in the specialty of orthodontics, the WFO has revised and updated its previous document to reflect the expanded scope and demands of current orthodontic education and practice. The members of the task force participated in a thorough revision of the guidelines and created a new document that takes into consideration the didactic, clinical, and the appropriate physical facilities to provide clinical care, study, and research areas. Although it is recognized that there will be variations in teaching and faculty assets, as well as facilities, access to materials, and equipment, the aim of the WFO Educational Guidelines is to provide the minimum program requirements necessary to provide orthodontic specialty residents the educational experience that prepares them to deliver the best level of orthodontic treatment for their patients. It is recommended that these guidelines be used universally by orthodontic specialty program educators and related educational, scientific, and administrative institutions to evaluate and compare their curriculum to a world standard.

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the same amount of tooth movement among four different virtual setup software programs.

Methods

This retrospective study included 32 patients who underwent Invisalign treatment. Patients’ initial stereolithography (STL) files were imported to three different software programs (SureSmile Aligner [Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC], Ortho Insight 3D [Motion View software, Chattanooga, TN], and Ortho Analyzer [3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark]). After virtually moving teeth based on the numbers from ClinCheck Pro (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) tooth movement tables, final STL files were exported from all four software programs. ClinCheck Pro final STL files were used as references, while final STL files from the other software programs were used as targets. Superimpositions were performed between references and target STL files using Geomagic Control X software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC), and color-coded maps were obtained to illustrate potential differences.

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficient showed a high degree of reliability for repeated methodology (0.995–0.997). The differences among absolute averages (Abs Avg.), averages of positive values (+Avg.), and negative values (−Avg.) for both upper and lower models were significant among all software programs (ClinCheck Pro, SureSmile Aligner, Ortho Insight 3D, and Ortho Analyzer), for both upper and lower STL files, the smallest difference was found between ClinCheck Pro and SureSmile Aligner with a median of (0.03, 0.31, −0.19) mm for upper and (0.02, 0.29, −0.17) mm for lower STL files (Abs Avg., +Avg. and −Avg.), respectively. The biggest difference was found to be between ClinCheck Pro and Ortho Analyzer with a median of (0.05, 0.46, −0.45) mm for upper and (0.06, 0.48, −0.40) mm for lower STL files. There were no significant differences in the number of aligners per patient.

Conclusions

Final outcomes of the same amount of tooth movement in four different software programs differed significantly. The number of aligners per patient remained unchanged.

Backround

This study aimed to analyze the semantic network and content analyses of the posts published in a subreddit related to orthodontic treatment on Reddit (Advance Publications, Inc., San Francisco, California).

Methods

The eight threads in the r/Braces subreddit were divided into two categories: 1) “treatment process” (Braces are off!!!, Braces progress, Before and after!, and Day 1!) and 2) “question/problem” (Question, Discussion!, Need advice! and Rant!). For both categories, a semantic network analysis was performed using the Leximancer software (Leximancer Pty Ltd., Brisbane, Australia). In addition, the quality of the posts published in the “question” thread and the usefulness of the replies provided to these questions (useful, misleading, or neutral) were analyzed.

Results

Seven themes (braces, teeth, months, day, worth, started, and result) that mostly emphasized orthodontic treatment and treatment duration were elicited from the “treatment process” category, and seven themes (teeth, orthodontist, braces, week, bands, brush, and extractions) that mostly emphasized orthodontic treatment, orthodontists, and time were elicited from the “question/problem” category. It was also revealed that users voted on the posts related to the “treatment process” category and moved the posts to the list of top posts on the platform. In the “question” thread, 47.79% of the posts asked for advice and 21.11% of them were related to failures. In addition, 69% of the replies were categorized as “useful.”

Conclusions

Reddit is a successful data mining platform, and the users provide highly useful replies to the questions posted on Reddit regarding orthodontic treatment.

Background

The development of intraoral scanning technology has effectively enhanced the digital documentation of orthodontic dental casts. Albeit, the expense of this technology is the main limitation.

The purpose of the present study was to assess the validity and reliability of virtual three-dimensional (3D) models of orthodontic dental casts, which were constructed using smartphone-based 3D photogrammetry.

Methods

A smartphone was used to capture a set of two-dimensional images for 30 orthodontic dental casts. The captured images were processed to construct 3D virtual images using Agisoft and 3DF Zephyr software programs. To evaluate the accuracy of the virtual 3D models obtained by the two software programs, the virtual 3D models were compared with cone-beam computed tomography scans of the 30 dental casts. Colored maps were used to express the absolute distances between the points of each compared two surfaces; then, the means of the 100%, 95th, and 90th of the absolute distances were calculated. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to detect any significant differences.

Results

The differences between the constructed 3D images and the cone-beam computed tomography scans were not statistically significant and were accepted clinically. The deviations were mostly in the interproximal areas and in the occlusal details (sharp cusps and deep pits and fissures).

Conclusions

This study found that smartphone-based stereophotogrammetry is an accurate and reliable method for 3D modeling of orthodontic dental casts, with errors less than the accepted clinically detectable error of 0.5 mm. Smartphone photogrammetry succeeded in presenting occlusal details, but it was difficult to accurately reproduce interproximal areas.