Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies have become popular in orthodontics. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of printing technology, orientation, and layer height on the accuracy of 3D-printed dental models.
The maxillary arch of a post-treatment patient was scanned and printed at different orientations (0°, 90°) and layer thicknesses (25 µm, 50 µm, 100 µm, and 175 µm) using two different printing technologies (digital light processing and stereolithography). The 120 models were digitally scanned, and their average deviation from the initial model was analyzed using 3D algorithm. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of all variables on the average deviation from the initial model for the common layer thicknesses (50/100 µm). Finally, one-way ANOVA and Tukey posthoc test was used to compare the stereolithography (SLA) 25 µm and digital light processing (DLP) 175 µm groups with the groups that showed the least average deviation in the former analysis.
The multivariable linear regression analysis showed that the DLP 50 µm (mean ± SD: −0.022 ± 0.012 mm) and 100 µm (mean ± SD: −0.02 ± 0.009 mm) horizontally printed models showed the least average deviation from the initial model. Finally, the DLP 175 µm horizontally printed models (mean ± SD: 0.015 ± 0.005 mm) and the SLA 25 µm horizontally (mean ± SD: 0.011 ± 0.005 mm) printed models were more accurate.
All the models showed dimensional accuracy within the reported clinically acceptable limits. The highest accuracy was observed with DLP printer, 175 µm layer thickness, and horizontal orientation followed by SLA printer, 25 µm layer thickness, and horizontal orientation.
The esthetic preference and decision concerning undergoing orthognathic surgery in the transgender population have not been reported. The aims of this study were to examine the influence of the sagittal mandibular position on the esthetic perception and perceived surgery need in male-to-female transgenders (MTFTs) compared with male and female laypeople.
A questionnaire study was performed by male-to-female transgender, male and female laypeople. Three-dimensional black & white male and female facial images with facial contour angle (FCA) of 3°, 1°, 5°, 9°,13°, 17°, and 21° were shown to the participants. The participants scored the images’ perceived facial attractiveness using visual analog scales (VAS) and indicated whether orthognathic surgery was needed.
The participants included 85 MTFTs, 85 males, and 85 females. The results revealed that there were significant differences in the VAS scores between the MTFT and male participants. The MTFTs rated the male images with prognathism of 1° and -3°FCA in significantly lower scores compared with the males (P = 0.033, P = 0.010). Female images with prognathism 1°FCA was rated by the MTFTs in significantly lower scores compared with the males (P = 0.041). A significantly higher number of surgery needs was found in the MTFTs compared with the other groups.
Gender influences esthetic perception and the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. MTFTs have a unique perspective on facial esthetics, being more desirous of surgery than males and females. Clinicians should be aware of the ideal expectation in facial esthetics in MTFTs.
An uncommon location for placing miniscrews, used to provide anchorage control in various tooth movements, is the alveolar ridge. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of the success rate of alveolar ridge miniscrews and examine variables that might impact their success.
Charts for 295 patients who had miniscrews were screened. Twenty patients (5 male and 15 female: average age = 38.15 ± 15.10 years) with a total of 50 alveolar ridge miniscrews were analyzed. A customized data form was used to collect patients’ and miniscrews’ related variables. Kaplan–Meier estimator was used for the survival function, whereas Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to associate collected variables with alveolar ridge miniscrew survival.
In total, 31 (62.0%) miniscrews were stable and 19 (38.0%) failed. The survival time for those that failed was 6.03 ± 7.08 months. The follow-up period for those that survived was 35.84 ± 19.47 months. Male gender versus female (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–4.48; P = 0.003), and if the miniscrew was a replacement versus non-replacement (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.07–0.99; P = 0.048) influenced the survival. Additionally, miniscrews that were used for both indirect and direct or indirect anchorage alone plus those with evidence of splinting showed a 100% survival rate, which led to an HR 0 (P < 0.001). When the previously mentioned variables were modeled, none seemed to have a significant effect on failure except for splinting and type of anchorage (P < 0.001), because none of the splinted miniscrews failed.
The failure rate of alveolar ridge miniscrews was (38.0%) over 6.03 ± 7.08 months. The survival rate was (62.0%) over 35.84 ± 19.47 months. The evidence of splinting and the type of anchorage had a significant effect on survival probability.
Orthodontic uprighting or traction of an impacted mandibular second molar often necessitates invasive interventions. This report aims to illustrate the utilization of nickel-titanium wire segments inserted into small, simple tubes for uprighting mesially impacted mandibular second molars and also for scissor bite correction. The term “simple tube” refers to a tube without a bonding base attached to a tooth surface by covering it with flowable composite resin. Due to the absence of a bonding base, the simple tube is characterized by its diminutive size and minimal profile height, facilitating placement on partially exposed second molars and unconventional positioning to adjust the force geometry. In this case study, mesially-impacted mandibular second molars with scissor bite were uprighted in a 21-year-old male utilizing simple tubes. Simple tubes can be used for molar uprighting and scissor bite correction buccally and lingually.
It is now possible to predictably distalize maxillary first molars in nongrowing patients with the infra-zygomatic gear distalizer and to improve malocclusions without having to extract the premolars and regardless of the patient's compliance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount and rate of distal movement of the maxillary first molars using our proposed appliance after extraction of maxillary second molars.
Ten nongrowing female patients successfully treated with our proposed appliance were the subjects of this study. The amount, rate, and type of distalization, were analyzed through upper jaw cone beam computed tomography (pre- and post-treatment) and scanned casts taken on a monthly interval.
The average amount of distalization of the maxillary first molars was 4.03 mm at the crown level and 2.88 mm at the root level. The rate of distalization had an average of 0.61 mm per month with a maximum of 0.79 mm in the first month because of the regional acceleratory phenomena after extracting the maxillary second molar.
The maxillary first molars were distalized in a significant manner and all patients reached a Class I relation within an average duration of 6.4 months. The proposed appliance proved to be a viable noncompliance modality to distalize maxillary first molars correcting maxillary Class II malocclusions characterized by maxillary protrusion or maxillary incisor crowding.