首页 > 最新文献

Adoption Quarterly最新文献

英文 中文
Adoptive Families’ Views about Effective Services Prior to Residential Treatment Center Placement 收养家庭对安置治疗中心前有效服务的看法
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-07-21 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1790453
Catherine A. LaBrenz, Rowena Fong, K. Brown, Erin Findley
Abstract Children who have been adopted are more likely to have mental health diagnoses than non-adopted peers and may be overrepresented in residential treatment centers (RTCs). Yet, few studies have examined adoptive parents’ experiences with RTCs. We administered a survey to N = 113 adoptive parents who had at least one child in RTC. Many families utilized services such as family therapy, but fewer used adoption-competent therapists or trauma-informed care. Themes emerged related to finding support, connecting with providers, training in a trauma-informed approach, listening to parents, and shifting toward prevention. Implications are discussed to better support adoptive families.
摘要被收养的儿童比未被收养的同龄人更有可能被诊断为心理健康,并且在寄宿治疗中心(RTC)中的比例可能过高。然而,很少有研究调查养父母使用RTC的经历。我们对113名至少有一个孩子在RTC的养父母进行了调查。许多家庭使用家庭治疗等服务,但很少使用有收养能力的治疗师或创伤知情护理。出现的主题涉及寻找支持、与提供者联系、创伤知情方法培训、倾听父母的意见以及转向预防。讨论了对更好地支持收养家庭的影响。
{"title":"Adoptive Families’ Views about Effective Services Prior to Residential Treatment Center Placement","authors":"Catherine A. LaBrenz, Rowena Fong, K. Brown, Erin Findley","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1790453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1790453","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Children who have been adopted are more likely to have mental health diagnoses than non-adopted peers and may be overrepresented in residential treatment centers (RTCs). Yet, few studies have examined adoptive parents’ experiences with RTCs. We administered a survey to N = 113 adoptive parents who had at least one child in RTC. Many families utilized services such as family therapy, but fewer used adoption-competent therapists or trauma-informed care. Themes emerged related to finding support, connecting with providers, training in a trauma-informed approach, listening to parents, and shifting toward prevention. Implications are discussed to better support adoptive families.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"219 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1790453","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45808729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Religious Motivation to Adopt as a Predictor of Adoptive Family Structure, Parental Discipline, and Outcomes 宗教动机对收养家庭结构、父母管教和结果的预测作用
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-07-21 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1790451
E. Helder, M. Gunnoe, H. Timmermans
Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine religious motivation to adopt and how this relates to decisions families made while adopting, firm discipline, attachment, parent stress and affect, and child externalizing and internalizing. Within the United States, 44 internationally adopted children and their parents participated in this six-year, longitudinal study. Families endorsing greater religious motivation adopted older children and had larger family sizes. Controlling for these factors, greater religious motivation also predicted firmer discipline practices. Religious motivation did not predict parenting stress or parent negative affect. Additionally, positive longitudinal child outcomes were best predicted by larger family size, fewer baseline attachment disturbances, and less baseline externalizing and internalizing – rather than religious motivation, firm discipline, or the interaction between the two.
摘要:本研究的目的是探讨宗教领养动机,以及这与家庭领养时所做的决定、坚定的纪律、依恋、父母的压力和情感,以及儿童的外化和内化之间的关系。在美国,44名被国际领养的儿童和他们的父母参与了这项为期六年的纵向研究。支持更大宗教动机的家庭收养年龄较大的孩子,家庭规模较大。控制了这些因素,更大的宗教动机也预示着更严格的纪律实践。宗教动机不能预测养育压力或父母的负面影响。此外,更大的家庭规模、更少的基线依恋干扰、更少的基线外化和内化——而不是宗教动机、坚定的纪律或两者之间的相互作用——最能预测积极的纵向儿童结果。
{"title":"Religious Motivation to Adopt as a Predictor of Adoptive Family Structure, Parental Discipline, and Outcomes","authors":"E. Helder, M. Gunnoe, H. Timmermans","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1790451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1790451","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine religious motivation to adopt and how this relates to decisions families made while adopting, firm discipline, attachment, parent stress and affect, and child externalizing and internalizing. Within the United States, 44 internationally adopted children and their parents participated in this six-year, longitudinal study. Families endorsing greater religious motivation adopted older children and had larger family sizes. Controlling for these factors, greater religious motivation also predicted firmer discipline practices. Religious motivation did not predict parenting stress or parent negative affect. Additionally, positive longitudinal child outcomes were best predicted by larger family size, fewer baseline attachment disturbances, and less baseline externalizing and internalizing – rather than religious motivation, firm discipline, or the interaction between the two.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"163 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1790451","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43018603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Adopting Again: A Qualitative Study of the Second Transition to Parenthood in Adoptive Families 再次收养:收养家庭第二次为人父母过渡的定性研究
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2019.1627450
Reihonna L. Frost, A. Goldberg
Abstract The transition to second-time parenthood—i.e., becoming a parent to a second child—is a time of adjustment and change for the whole family. While research has demonstrated that family transitions can be uniquely challenging in the adoptive context, no known research has studied the transition to second parenthood in adoptive families. The current qualitative study explores the transition to second parenthood for heterosexual, lesbian, and gay adoptive parents. Participants were 60 individuals in 30 couples (i.e., 9 heterosexual couples, 10 lesbian couples, and 11 gay male couples) who had adopted their first child two to five years earlier and were in various stages of adopting a second child. Findings centered on parents’ process of considering, preparing for, and then adopting a second child—with parents emphasizing the ways that the second adoption process was different from the first. Specifically, parents described more restrictions on the characteristics of child they would adopt, greater comfort with “holding out” for a child who fit their family, and feeling less stressed by the adoption process. Parents also explained how the unpredictable nature of adoption presented challenges to introducing a second child to the family. Implications for adoptive families and adoption professionals are discussed.
摘要向第二次为人父母的转变,即成为第二个孩子的父母,是整个家庭调整和改变的时刻。虽然研究表明,在收养背景下,家庭转变可能具有独特的挑战性,但没有已知的研究研究收养家庭向第二代父母的转变。目前的定性研究探讨了异性恋、女同性恋和男同性恋养父母向第二代父母的转变。参与者是30对夫妇中的60人(即9对异性恋夫妇、10对女同性恋夫妇和11对男同性恋夫妇),他们收养了他们的第一个孩子,从两岁到五岁 几年前,他们正处于收养第二个孩子的不同阶段。研究结果集中在父母考虑、准备和收养第二个孩子的过程中,父母强调第二个收养过程与第一个不同。具体而言,父母描述了对他们将要收养的孩子的特征的更多限制,对“坚持”一个适合他们家庭的孩子有更大的安慰,并且在收养过程中感到压力更小。家长们还解释了收养的不可预测性如何给家庭引入第二个孩子带来挑战。讨论了对收养家庭和收养专业人员的影响。
{"title":"Adopting Again: A Qualitative Study of the Second Transition to Parenthood in Adoptive Families","authors":"Reihonna L. Frost, A. Goldberg","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2019.1627450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2019.1627450","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The transition to second-time parenthood—i.e., becoming a parent to a second child—is a time of adjustment and change for the whole family. While research has demonstrated that family transitions can be uniquely challenging in the adoptive context, no known research has studied the transition to second parenthood in adoptive families. The current qualitative study explores the transition to second parenthood for heterosexual, lesbian, and gay adoptive parents. Participants were 60 individuals in 30 couples (i.e., 9 heterosexual couples, 10 lesbian couples, and 11 gay male couples) who had adopted their first child two to five years earlier and were in various stages of adopting a second child. Findings centered on parents’ process of considering, preparing for, and then adopting a second child—with parents emphasizing the ways that the second adoption process was different from the first. Specifically, parents described more restrictions on the characteristics of child they would adopt, greater comfort with “holding out” for a child who fit their family, and feeling less stressed by the adoption process. Parents also explained how the unpredictable nature of adoption presented challenges to introducing a second child to the family. Implications for adoptive families and adoption professionals are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"109 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2019.1627450","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44777305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Microaggressions experienced by adoptive families and internationally adopted adolescents in France 法国收养家庭和国际收养青少年的微侵犯行为
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-03-30 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1719253
L. Miller, Marie-Odile Pérouse de Montclos, Jessica A. K. Matthews, Janice Peyré, J. Vaugelade, O. Baubin, Jacques Chomilier, J. de Monléon, A. de Truchis, F. Sorge, E. Pinderhughes
Abstract France receives a relatively large number of international adoptions. However, little is known about the frequency and types of microaggressions experienced by adoptive parents and internationally adopted adolescents in France. Unusually, France functions legally as a colorblind society, where race is not officially recognized. Therefore, we surveyed adoptive parents and adopted adolescents regarding their feelings of difference and experience of prejudice – related to both adoptive status and country of origin. Some respondents reported that special needs represented an additional area of stigma. Family belonging, adoption identity, and adoption visibility all impacted the experience of microaggressions by French internationally adopted adolescents and their parents.
摘要法国接受的国际收养人数相对较多。然而,人们对法国养父母和国际收养青少年遭受微侵犯的频率和类型知之甚少。不同寻常的是,法国在法律上是一个色盲社会,种族不被官方承认。因此,我们调查了养父母和被收养的青少年的差异感和偏见经历,这与收养身份和原籍国有关。一些答复者报告说,特殊需要是另一个耻辱领域。家庭归属、收养身份和收养知名度都影响了法国国际收养青少年及其父母的微侵犯经历。
{"title":"Microaggressions experienced by adoptive families and internationally adopted adolescents in France","authors":"L. Miller, Marie-Odile Pérouse de Montclos, Jessica A. K. Matthews, Janice Peyré, J. Vaugelade, O. Baubin, Jacques Chomilier, J. de Monléon, A. de Truchis, F. Sorge, E. Pinderhughes","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1719253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719253","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract France receives a relatively large number of international adoptions. However, little is known about the frequency and types of microaggressions experienced by adoptive parents and internationally adopted adolescents in France. Unusually, France functions legally as a colorblind society, where race is not officially recognized. Therefore, we surveyed adoptive parents and adopted adolescents regarding their feelings of difference and experience of prejudice – related to both adoptive status and country of origin. Some respondents reported that special needs represented an additional area of stigma. Family belonging, adoption identity, and adoption visibility all impacted the experience of microaggressions by French internationally adopted adolescents and their parents.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"135 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719253","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43168665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Locating the Intersections of Disability, Race and Ethnicity in Adoption Rates among Foster Children Introduction 定位残疾、种族和民族在寄养儿童收养率中的交叉点
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1719252
L. Johnson, E. Slayter, Allyson Livingstone
Abstract The promotion of speedy, permanent adoption outcomes for children in foster care whose parental rights have been terminated is a central child welfare policy goal. However, while both children of color and children with disabilities are at greater risk for child welfare involvement, little is known about influence of these intersecting identities on adoption rates. This cross-sectional national study draws on the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) to explore the between and within group foster care outcomes of adoption. While we expected to see advantages in outcomes based on identification with privileged social identities, our findings were much more varied. Implications relate to the need for intersectional approaches to equity assessments of child welfare systems and practice.
摘要:促进父母权利被终止的寄养儿童的快速、永久收养是儿童福利政策的核心目标。然而,尽管有色人种儿童和残疾儿童都面临更大的儿童福利参与风险,但人们对这些相互交叉的身份对收养率的影响知之甚少。这项横断面的国家研究利用收养和寄养分析和报告系统(AFCARS)来探索收养之间和内部的群体寄养结果。虽然我们期望看到基于特权社会身份认同的结果的优势,但我们的发现更加多样化。所涉问题涉及需要对儿童福利制度和做法的公平评价采取交叉方法。
{"title":"Locating the Intersections of Disability, Race and Ethnicity in Adoption Rates among Foster Children Introduction","authors":"L. Johnson, E. Slayter, Allyson Livingstone","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1719252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719252","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The promotion of speedy, permanent adoption outcomes for children in foster care whose parental rights have been terminated is a central child welfare policy goal. However, while both children of color and children with disabilities are at greater risk for child welfare involvement, little is known about influence of these intersecting identities on adoption rates. This cross-sectional national study draws on the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) to explore the between and within group foster care outcomes of adoption. While we expected to see advantages in outcomes based on identification with privileged social identities, our findings were much more varied. Implications relate to the need for intersectional approaches to equity assessments of child welfare systems and practice.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"110 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719252","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44543233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Why Moral Theories Matter: A Review of Ethics and Adoption Literature 为什么道德理论很重要:伦理学与收养文学综述
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255
Bibiana D. Koh, F. Reamer
Abstract This study argues that moral theory is an important aspect of our use of self in adoption practice. Within this context, the authors examined the extent to which ethical theories were explicitly incorporated in the peer-reviewed adoption literature – published between 1996 and 2019 – that purported to focus on ethical issues. Findings from our review suggest that the inclusion of moral theories was largely implicit (e.g., informed by relevant codes of ethics, professional standards, and/or legislation) rather than explicit. Our literature review also revealed a wide range of ethical issues in adoption. Recommendations are made in the context of these findings.
摘要本研究认为,道德理论是我们在收养实践中使用自我的一个重要方面。在这种背景下,作者研究了1996年至2019年间发表的同行评审收养文献中明确纳入伦理理论的程度,这些文献旨在关注伦理问题。我们的审查结果表明,道德理论的纳入在很大程度上是隐含的(例如,受相关道德规范、职业标准和/或立法的影响),而不是明确的。我们的文献综述还揭示了收养过程中的一系列伦理问题。建议是在这些调查结果的背景下提出的。
{"title":"Why Moral Theories Matter: A Review of Ethics and Adoption Literature","authors":"Bibiana D. Koh, F. Reamer","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study argues that moral theory is an important aspect of our use of self in adoption practice. Within this context, the authors examined the extent to which ethical theories were explicitly incorporated in the peer-reviewed adoption literature – published between 1996 and 2019 – that purported to focus on ethical issues. Findings from our review suggest that the inclusion of moral theories was largely implicit (e.g., informed by relevant codes of ethics, professional standards, and/or legislation) rather than explicit. Our literature review also revealed a wide range of ethical issues in adoption. Recommendations are made in the context of these findings.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"5 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43735291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents’ Experiences with Pediatricians: A Mixed-Methods Study 女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋领养父母与儿科医生的经历:一项混合方法研究
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-02-03 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839
A. Goldberg, Reihonna L. Frost, Melissa H. Manley, Nora M. McCormick, JuliAnna Z. Smith, D. Brodzinsky
Abstract Despite unique health risks and outcomes among adopted children, most pediatricians receive little training about this population. The current mixed-methods study explored lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents' (n = 224, in 129 families) experiences with and perspectives on pediatricians. Parents in the study adopted via private domestic, public domestic, and international adoption. Parents who adopted via public domestic adoption were more likely to talk with pediatricians about adoption while parents who adopted internationally were most likely to feel positively about their pediatrician’s adoption competence. Qualitative findings suggest that while parents did not look to pediatricians as sources of adoption expertise, they were disappointed when doctors did not take the adoption context into account when providing medical treatment. Findings hold implications for adoptive families, adoption practitioners, and health professionals, especially pediatricians.
尽管收养儿童有独特的健康风险和结果,但大多数儿科医生对这一人群的培训很少。当前的混合方法研究探讨了女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋养父母(n = 224, 129个家庭)对儿科医生的经历和看法。研究中的父母通过国内私人收养、国内公共收养和国际收养进行收养。通过国内公开收养的父母更有可能与儿科医生谈论收养问题,而国际收养的父母最有可能对儿科医生的收养能力持积极态度。定性调查结果表明,虽然父母没有将儿科医生视为收养专业知识的来源,但当医生在提供医疗服务时没有考虑到收养情况时,他们感到失望。研究结果对收养家庭、收养从业人员和卫生专业人员,特别是儿科医生具有启示意义。
{"title":"Lesbian, Gay, and Heterosexual Adoptive Parents’ Experiences with Pediatricians: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"A. Goldberg, Reihonna L. Frost, Melissa H. Manley, Nora M. McCormick, JuliAnna Z. Smith, D. Brodzinsky","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite unique health risks and outcomes among adopted children, most pediatricians receive little training about this population. The current mixed-methods study explored lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents' (n = 224, in 129 families) experiences with and perspectives on pediatricians. Parents in the study adopted via private domestic, public domestic, and international adoption. Parents who adopted via public domestic adoption were more likely to talk with pediatricians about adoption while parents who adopted internationally were most likely to feel positively about their pediatrician’s adoption competence. Qualitative findings suggest that while parents did not look to pediatricians as sources of adoption expertise, they were disappointed when doctors did not take the adoption context into account when providing medical treatment. Findings hold implications for adoptive families, adoption practitioners, and health professionals, especially pediatricians.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"27 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675839","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47965740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Developments in U.S. Intercountry Adoption Policy since Its Peak in 2004 美国跨国收养政策自2004年达到顶峰以来的发展
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-01-30 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2020.1719254
S. Neville, K. Rotabi
Abstract This paper examines the implications of recent developments in U.S. intercountry adoption (ICA) policy for vulnerable children. We review policy and practices from 2004-2018, including (1) the 2008 implementation of the Hague Convention and (2) the 2017 changes in Hague accrediting entities for adoption agencies. By analyzing the ICA contexts of the top five States of origin, we argue the decline in ICA is from factors within States of origin rather than U.S. policy. Though ICA benefits individual children’s development, it can cause harm at a systems level, so the decline in ICA has mixed implications for vulnerable children.
摘要本文探讨了美国跨国收养(ICA)政策对弱势儿童的影响。我们回顾了2004-2018年的政策和做法,包括:(1)2008年《海牙公约》的实施;(2)2017年海牙收养机构认证实体的变化。通过分析前五大移民来源国的ICA背景,我们认为ICA的下降是由移民来源国内部的因素造成的,而不是美国的政策。虽然ICA有利于儿童个体的发展,但它可能在系统层面造成伤害,因此ICA的下降对弱势儿童的影响是复杂的。
{"title":"Developments in U.S. Intercountry Adoption Policy since Its Peak in 2004","authors":"S. Neville, K. Rotabi","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1719254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719254","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the implications of recent developments in U.S. intercountry adoption (ICA) policy for vulnerable children. We review policy and practices from 2004-2018, including (1) the 2008 implementation of the Hague Convention and (2) the 2017 changes in Hague accrediting entities for adoption agencies. By analyzing the ICA contexts of the top five States of origin, we argue the decline in ICA is from factors within States of origin rather than U.S. policy. Though ICA benefits individual children’s development, it can cause harm at a systems level, so the decline in ICA has mixed implications for vulnerable children.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"63 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44289458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
“Your Skin’s Not as Good as Us”: Microaggressions among Transracially-Adopted Children from China “你的皮肤不如我们好”:来自中国的跨种族收养儿童的微侵犯
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2019.1675837
Emily Zhang, Xian Zhang, E. Pinderhughes
Abstract This mixed methods study examined the nature of adoption and racial microaggressions and their relations with age and community diversity among 42 Chinese transracial adoptees ages 5–9. Using microaggression typologies by Baden and Sue et al., we found that children must often navigate multiple messages within a single microaggression incident. Although experience and awareness of microaggressions did not differ among children by community diversity, experience of racial microaggression incidents was positively associated with age. Given that young children experience microaggressions, preparation for bias should be considered for children at young ages in a developmentally appropriate manner.
摘要本研究对42名5 ~ 9岁的中国跨种族被收养者的收养行为和种族微侵犯行为的性质及其与年龄和社区多样性的关系进行了研究。利用Baden和Sue等人的微攻击类型学,我们发现儿童必须经常在单一微攻击事件中处理多个信息。虽然不同社区的儿童对微侵犯事件的经历和意识没有差异,但种族微侵犯事件的经历与年龄呈正相关。鉴于幼儿经历过微侵犯,应以适合幼儿发展的方式考虑为偏见做准备。
{"title":"“Your Skin’s Not as Good as Us”: Microaggressions among Transracially-Adopted Children from China","authors":"Emily Zhang, Xian Zhang, E. Pinderhughes","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2019.1675837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675837","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This mixed methods study examined the nature of adoption and racial microaggressions and their relations with age and community diversity among 42 Chinese transracial adoptees ages 5–9. Using microaggression typologies by Baden and Sue et al., we found that children must often navigate multiple messages within a single microaggression incident. Although experience and awareness of microaggressions did not differ among children by community diversity, experience of racial microaggression incidents was positively associated with age. Given that young children experience microaggressions, preparation for bias should be considered for children at young ages in a developmentally appropriate manner.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":"284 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42086771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Adoption Discontinuity in Intensive Out-of-Home Care Settings 家庭外重症护理机构的收养中断
IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/10926755.2019.1675838
Jaeran Kim, Kristine N. Piescher, T. Laliberte
Abstract This study sought to understand previous adoption experiences of youth placed in residential, group, and treatment foster care settings. A secondary analysis of an existing point-in-time prevalence study of 869 youth in 38 private residential, group home, and treatment foster care facilities were conducted. Gender, race, number of placements, and having a developmental disability were variables that significantly explained adoption disruption while placement histories and race/ethnicity significantly explained adoption dissolutions. Findings suggest the need for ongoing worker, provider and caregiver training and the importance of understanding a youth’s adoption history.
摘要本研究旨在了解被安置在寄宿、团体和治疗寄养环境中的年轻人以前的收养经历。对38个私人住宅、集体之家和治疗寄养设施中869名青年的现有时间点流行率研究进行了二次分析。性别、种族、安置次数和发育障碍是显著解释收养中断的变量,而安置史和种族/民族则显著解释收养解散。研究结果表明,有必要对工作人员、提供者和护理人员进行持续培训,了解青少年收养史也很重要。
{"title":"Adoption Discontinuity in Intensive Out-of-Home Care Settings","authors":"Jaeran Kim, Kristine N. Piescher, T. Laliberte","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2019.1675838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675838","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study sought to understand previous adoption experiences of youth placed in residential, group, and treatment foster care settings. A secondary analysis of an existing point-in-time prevalence study of 869 youth in 38 private residential, group home, and treatment foster care facilities were conducted. Gender, race, number of placements, and having a developmental disability were variables that significantly explained adoption disruption while placement histories and race/ethnicity significantly explained adoption dissolutions. Findings suggest the need for ongoing worker, provider and caregiver training and the importance of understanding a youth’s adoption history.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":"307 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2019.1675838","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47864838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Adoption Quarterly
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1