首页 > 最新文献

British Journal for the History of Science最新文献

英文 中文
Commercial television and primate ethology: facial expressions between Granada and London Zoo. 商业电视与灵长类动物人种学:格拉纳达与伦敦动物园之间的面部表情。
IF 0.7 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087422000437
Miles Kempton

This article examines the significant relationship that existed between commercial British television and the study of animal behaviour. Ethological research provided important content for the new television channel, at the same time as that coverage played a substantial role in creating a new research specialism, the study of primate facial expressions, for this emergent scientific discipline. The key site in this was a television and film unit at London Zoo administered by the Zoological Society and Granada TV. The Granada unit produced 'Animal expressions', a twenty-five-minute television film based on research on monkeys and apes by the Dutch postgraduate student and soon-to-be-leading-authority Jan van Hooff. Recovering the production and multiple uses of 'Animal expressions', this paper offers the first sustained historical analysis of science on commercial television. I show how Granada patronage helped Van Hooff to support his argument that human expressions such as smiling and laughter shared common evolutionary origins with similar facial movements in nonhuman primates. Emphasizing the mutual shaping of science and ITV, I argue that 'Animal expressions' repurposed televisual conventions of framing talking heads, and blended serious science with the comedy of 'funny faces', thereby epitomizing Granada's public-service strategy at a time when commercial television was defending itself from criticism in the Pilkington report.

本文探讨了英国商业电视与动物行为研究之间的重要关系。人种学研究为新的电视频道提供了重要的内容,与此同时,这种报道在为这一新兴的科学学科创建新的研究专业--灵长类动物面部表情研究--方面发挥了重要作用。其中的关键场所是由动物学会和格拉纳达电视台共同管理的伦敦动物园影视部。格拉纳达电视台制作了一部 25 分钟的电视片 "动物表情",该片以荷兰研究生、即将成为权威的扬-范-胡夫(Jan van Hooff)对猴子和猿猴的研究为基础。本文回顾了《动物的表情》的制作和多种用途,首次对商业电视中的科学进行了持续的历史分析。我展示了格拉纳达的赞助如何帮助范霍夫支持他的论点,即人类的微笑和大笑等表情与非人灵长类动物的类似面部动作有着共同的进化起源。在强调科学与 ITV 相互影响的同时,我认为 "动物表情 "重新利用了电视中的谈话头条,并将严肃的科学与 "滑稽表情 "的喜剧性融为一体,从而体现了格拉纳达的公共服务战略,而此时商业电视台正在为皮尔金顿报告中的批评进行自我辩护。
{"title":"Commercial television and primate ethology: facial expressions between Granada and London Zoo.","authors":"Miles Kempton","doi":"10.1017/S0007087422000437","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087422000437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the significant relationship that existed between commercial British television and the study of animal behaviour. Ethological research provided important content for the new television channel, at the same time as that coverage played a substantial role in creating a new research specialism, the study of primate facial expressions, for this emergent scientific discipline. The key site in this was a television and film unit at London Zoo administered by the Zoological Society and Granada TV. The Granada unit produced 'Animal expressions', a twenty-five-minute television film based on research on monkeys and apes by the Dutch postgraduate student and soon-to-be-leading-authority Jan van Hooff. Recovering the production and multiple uses of 'Animal expressions', this paper offers the first sustained historical analysis of science on commercial television. I show how Granada patronage helped Van Hooff to support his argument that human expressions such as smiling and laughter shared common evolutionary origins with similar facial movements in nonhuman primates. Emphasizing the mutual shaping of science and ITV, I argue that 'Animal expressions' repurposed televisual conventions of framing talking heads, and blended serious science with the comedy of 'funny faces', thereby epitomizing Granada's public-service strategy at a time when commercial television was defending itself from criticism in the Pilkington report.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"83-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10380762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stratifying seamanship: sailors' knowledge and the mechanical arts in eighteenth-century Britain. 航海技术的分层:十八世纪英国水手的知识和机械艺术。
IF 0.7 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087422000425
Elin Jones

A new genre of treatises on practical seamanship emerged in eighteenth-century Britain. Authored by a group of seamen with decades of experience on the lower deck of merchant and naval vessels, these texts represented the ship as a machine, and seamanship as a form of mechanical experiment which could only be carried out by deep-sea sailors. However, as this article finds, this group of sailor-authors had only a brief moment of authoritative legitimacy before their ideas were repackaged and promoted by land-bound authors and naval officers, and the progenitors of the 'science of seamanship' were deemed unfit participants in its ongoing practice. This article explores this brief moment, taking seriously the ideas and influences of the maritime milieu which spawned it, and arguing that the codification and circulation of 'useful knowledge' in eighteenth-century Britain often hardened social hierarchies. Examining seamanship forces us to question the progressivist linear trajectory of an increasingly open scientific culture during this period, and to focus instead on a repeating pattern in which the working knowledge of labourers and artisans was appropriated and its original practitioners denigrated.

十八世纪的英国出现了一种新的实用航海技术论文流派。这些文章由一群在商船和军舰下层工作了数十年的海员撰写,将船舶描述为一台机器,将航海技术描述为一种只有深海水手才能进行的机械实验。然而,正如本文所发现的,这群水手作者在他们的思想被陆地上的作者和海军军官重新包装和推广之前,只获得了短暂的权威合法性,"航海科学 "的创始人被认为不适合参与其正在进行的实践。本文探讨了这一短暂的时刻,认真研究了催生它的海上环境的思想和影响,并认为 18 世纪英国 "有用知识 "的编纂和流通往往强化了社会等级制度。对航海技术的研究迫使我们质疑这一时期日益开放的科学文化的进步主义线性轨迹,转而关注一种重复的模式,即工人和工匠的工作知识被挪用,其最初的实践者被诋毁。
{"title":"Stratifying seamanship: sailors' knowledge and the mechanical arts in eighteenth-century Britain.","authors":"Elin Jones","doi":"10.1017/S0007087422000425","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087422000425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new genre of treatises on practical seamanship emerged in eighteenth-century Britain. Authored by a group of seamen with decades of experience on the lower deck of merchant and naval vessels, these texts represented the ship as a machine, and seamanship as a form of mechanical experiment which could only be carried out by deep-sea sailors. However, as this article finds, this group of sailor-authors had only a brief moment of authoritative legitimacy before their ideas were repackaged and promoted by land-bound authors and naval officers, and the progenitors of the 'science of seamanship' were deemed unfit participants in its ongoing practice. This article explores this brief moment, taking seriously the ideas and influences of the maritime milieu which spawned it, and arguing that the codification and circulation of 'useful knowledge' in eighteenth-century Britain often hardened social hierarchies. Examining seamanship forces us to question the progressivist linear trajectory of an increasingly open scientific culture during this period, and to focus instead on a repeating pattern in which the working knowledge of labourers and artisans was appropriated and its original practitioners denigrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"45-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10781159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anti-voluntarism, natural providence and miracles in Thomas Burnet's Theory of the Earth. 托马斯-伯内特《地球论》中的反卷积论、自然天意和奇迹。
IF 0.7 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087422000462
Thomas Rossetter

In his Telluris Theoria Sacra and its English translation The Theory of the Earth (1681-90), the English clergyman and schoolmaster Thomas Burnet (c.1635-1715) constructed a geological history from the Creation to the Final Consummation, positing predominantly natural causes to explain biblical events and their effects on the Earth and life on it. Burnet's insistence on appealing primarily to natural rather than miraculous causes has been interpreted both by his contemporaries and by some historians as an essentially Cartesian principle. On this reading, Burnet adhered to a Cartesian style of explanation in which there was no place for miracles. In this paper, I propose a different interpretation. Burnet's commitment to natural over miraculous causes, I argue, was grounded in an anti-voluntarist theology which he inherited from the Cambridge Platonists and Latitudinarians. This anti-voluntarism, moreover, also dictated the kind of miracles to which he did appeal. This reading of Burnet contrasts with the view that he was simply following Cartesian principles. First, Descartes had espoused a radical form of theological voluntarism. Second, Burnet's and Descartes's views of providence were based on distinct attributes of God, and these attributes had quite different implications regarding the place of miracles in the providential order.

英国牧师兼校长托马斯-伯内特(Thomas Burnet,约 1635-1715 年)在他的《Telluris Theoria Sacra》及其英译本《地球论》(1681-90 年)中,构建了一部从创世到最后终结的地质史,主要以自然原因来解释圣经事件及其对地球和地球上生命的影响。伯内特坚持主要诉诸自然原因而非奇迹原因,这被他同时代的人和一些历史学家解释为本质上的笛卡尔原则。按照这种解读,伯纳坚持的是笛卡尔式的解释风格,其中没有奇迹的位置。在本文中,我提出了不同的解释。我认为,伯纳特对自然原因而非奇迹原因的承诺,是基于他从剑桥柏拉图派和纬度派那里继承的反卷积派神学。此外,这种反神迹论也决定了他所诉求的神迹类型。对伯纳的这种解读与认为他只是遵循笛卡尔原则的观点形成了鲜明对比。首先,笛卡尔信奉的是一种激进的神学唯意志论。其次,伯内和笛卡尔对天意的看法是基于上帝的不同属性,而这些属性对神迹在天意秩序中的地位有着截然不同的影响。
{"title":"Anti-voluntarism, natural providence and miracles in Thomas Burnet's <i>Theory of the Earth</i>.","authors":"Thomas Rossetter","doi":"10.1017/S0007087422000462","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087422000462","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In his <i>Telluris Theoria Sacra</i> and its English translation <i>The Theory of the Earth</i> (1681-90), the English clergyman and schoolmaster Thomas Burnet (<i>c.</i>1635-1715) constructed a geological history from the Creation to the Final Consummation, positing predominantly natural causes to explain biblical events and their effects on the Earth and life on it. Burnet's insistence on appealing primarily to natural rather than miraculous causes has been interpreted both by his contemporaries and by some historians as an essentially Cartesian principle. On this reading, Burnet adhered to a Cartesian style of explanation in which there was no place for miracles. In this paper, I propose a different interpretation. Burnet's commitment to natural over miraculous causes, I argue, was grounded in an anti-voluntarist theology which he inherited from the Cambridge Platonists and Latitudinarians. This anti-voluntarism, moreover, also dictated the kind of miracles to which he did appeal. This reading of Burnet contrasts with the view that he was simply following Cartesian principles. First, Descartes had espoused a radical form of theological voluntarism. Second, Burnet's and Descartes's views of providence were based on distinct attributes of God, and these attributes had quite different implications regarding the place of miracles in the providential order.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10380760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Colouring flowers: books, art, and experiment in the household of Margery and Henry Power. 花朵着色:玛格丽和亨利-鲍尔家中的书籍、艺术和实验。
IF 0.7 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087422000474
Christoffer Basse Eriksen, Xinyi Wen

This article examines the early modern household's importance for producing experimental knowledge through an examination of the Halifax household of Margery and Henry Power. While Henry Power has been studied as a natural philosopher within the male-dominated intellectual circles of Cambridge and London, the epistemic labour of his wife, Margery Power, has hitherto been overlooked. From the 1650s, this couple worked in tandem to enhance their understanding of the vegetable world through various paper technologies, from books, paper slips and recipe notebooks to Margery's drawing album and Henry's published Experimental Philosophy. Focusing on Margery's practice of hand-colouring flower books, her copied and original drawings of flowers and her experimental production of ink, we argue that Margery's sensibility towards colour was crucial to Henry's microscopic observations of plants. Even if Margery's sophisticated knowledge of plants never left the household, we argue that her contribution was nevertheless crucial to the observation and representation of plants within the community of experimental philosophy. In this way, our article highlights the importance of female artists within the history of scientific observation, the use of books and paperwork in the botanical disciplines, and the relationship between household science and experimental philosophy.

本文通过对马杰里-鲍尔和亨利-鲍尔的哈利法克斯家庭的研究,探讨了现代早期家庭在生产实验知识方面的重要性。在剑桥和伦敦以男性为主导的知识界,亨利-鲍尔一直作为自然哲学家被研究,而他的妻子玛格丽-鲍尔的认识论劳动却一直被忽视。从 16 世纪 50 年代开始,这对夫妇通过各种纸张技术,从书籍、纸条和食谱笔记本到玛格丽的画册和亨利出版的《实验哲学》,共同增进他们对植物世界的了解。我们将重点放在玛格丽为花卉书籍手工上色的做法、她临摹和原创的花卉图画以及她实验性的墨水制作上,我们认为玛格丽对色彩的敏感性对于亨利对植物的微观观察至关重要。尽管玛格丽对植物的精深了解从未离开过家庭,但我们认为,她的贡献对于实验哲学界对植物的观察和表现至关重要。通过这种方式,我们的文章强调了女艺术家在科学观察史、书籍和文书在植物学科中的使用以及家庭科学与实验哲学之间关系中的重要性。
{"title":"Colouring flowers: books, art, and experiment in the household of Margery and Henry Power.","authors":"Christoffer Basse Eriksen, Xinyi Wen","doi":"10.1017/S0007087422000474","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087422000474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the early modern household's importance for producing experimental knowledge through an examination of the Halifax household of Margery and Henry Power. While Henry Power has been studied as a natural philosopher within the male-dominated intellectual circles of Cambridge and London, the epistemic labour of his wife, Margery Power, has hitherto been overlooked. From the 1650s, this couple worked in tandem to enhance their understanding of the vegetable world through various paper technologies, from books, paper slips and recipe notebooks to Margery's drawing album and Henry's published <i>Experimental Philosophy</i>. Focusing on Margery's practice of hand-colouring flower books, her copied and original drawings of flowers and her experimental production of ink, we argue that Margery's sensibility towards colour was crucial to Henry's microscopic observations of plants. Even if Margery's sophisticated knowledge of plants never left the household, we argue that her contribution was nevertheless crucial to the observation and representation of plants within the community of experimental philosophy. In this way, our article highlights the importance of female artists within the history of scientific observation, the use of books and paperwork in the botanical disciplines, and the relationship between household science and experimental philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"21-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614357/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9537543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transnational scientific advising: occupied Japan, the United States National Academy of Sciences and the establishment of the Science Council of Japan. 跨国科学咨询:被占领的日本、美国国家科学院和日本科学理事会的成立。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087423000031
Kenji Ito

Given that the practices and institutions of knowledge production commonly referred to as 'science' are believed to have 'Western' origins, their apparent proliferation entails negotiations and power dynamics that shape both science and diplomacy in specific locales. This paper investigates a facet of this co-production of science and diplomacy in the emergence of knowledge infrastructure in Japan during the Allied Occupation. It focuses on the 1947 delegation from the United States National Academy of Sciences to Japan and its role in creating the Science Council of Japan (SCJ). While historians view this mission as having been dispatched to provide advice on the foundation of the SCJ, it was in fact an unintentional outcome. The original plan was to recruit long-term scientific advisers on science policy to Douglas MacArthur's headquarters. The creation of the SCJ was not the brainchild of any individual but the result of an unforeseen alteration of the original idea through negotiations among various actors. By examining the transnational aspects of this process and the complex social process underlying it, and drawing on Manuel DeLanda's assemblage theory, this paper proposes the concept of 'techno-diplomatic assemblage' for understanding the transnational construction of knowledge infrastructure such as the emergence of the SCJ.

鉴于通常被称为 "科学 "的知识生产实践和机构被认为起源于 "西方",它们的明显扩散意味着在特定地区塑造科学与外交的谈判和权力动态。本文研究了盟军占领时期日本知识基础设施兴起过程中科学与外交共同生产的一个方面。本文的重点是 1947 年美国国家科学院赴日代表团及其在创建日本科学理事会(SCJ)过程中发挥的作用。虽然历史学家认为派遣该代表团是为了就日本科学委员会的成立提供建议,但这实际上是一个无意的结果。最初的计划是为道格拉斯-麦克阿瑟的总部招募科学政策方面的长期科学顾问。科学委员会的成立并不是某个人的创意,而是通过不同参与者之间的协商,对最初的想法进行了意外改变的结果。通过研究这一过程的跨国方面及其背后复杂的社会过程,并借鉴曼努埃尔-德兰达的组合理论,本文提出了 "技术外交组合 "的概念,用于理解知识基础设施的跨国建设,如科学理事会的出现。
{"title":"Transnational scientific advising: occupied Japan, the United States National Academy of Sciences and the establishment of the Science Council of Japan.","authors":"Kenji Ito","doi":"10.1017/S0007087423000031","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087423000031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that the practices and institutions of knowledge production commonly referred to as 'science' are believed to have 'Western' origins, their apparent proliferation entails negotiations and power dynamics that shape both science and diplomacy in specific locales. This paper investigates a facet of this co-production of science and diplomacy in the emergence of knowledge infrastructure in Japan during the Allied Occupation. It focuses on the 1947 delegation from the United States National Academy of Sciences to Japan and its role in creating the Science Council of Japan (SCJ). While historians view this mission as having been dispatched to provide advice on the foundation of the SCJ, it was in fact an unintentional outcome. The original plan was to recruit long-term scientific advisers on science policy to Douglas MacArthur's headquarters. The creation of the SCJ was not the brainchild of any individual but the result of an unforeseen alteration of the original idea through negotiations among various actors. By examining the transnational aspects of this process and the complex social process underlying it, and drawing on Manuel DeLanda's assemblage theory, this paper proposes the concept of 'techno-diplomatic assemblage' for understanding the transnational construction of knowledge infrastructure such as the emergence of the SCJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10837963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medicine and the heavens in Padua's Faculty of Arts, 1570-1630. 帕多瓦艺术学院的医学与天堂,1570-1630年。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-04-28 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087422000152
Craig Martin

In the faculty of arts at the University of Padua in the years around 1600 professors debated the reliability of astrology, the existence of occult celestial influences, and the idea that celestial heat is present in living bodies. From the 1570s to the 1620s many professors in the faculty of arts pushed back against astrology and Jean Fernel's theories surrounding astral body. Girolamo Mercuriale, Alessandro Massaria and Eustachio Rudio thought that some forms of astral causation and Fernel's ideas were incompatible with their observations of disease, Aristotle's philosophy and Hippocratic theories. Later, Santorio Santorio and Cesare Cremonini, who were allied to the political circle of Paolo Sarpi, polemicized against astrology. Their writings show that at Padua medical theory was linked to Aristotelian cosmology, which emphasized the incommensurability between celestial and terrestrial elements. Their rejection of astrology, however, did not lead to the complete marginalization of astrology at Padua. By the middle of the 1620s, as the political climate changed in Venice, the University of Padua hired professors who promoted astrology and Fernel's theories about the celestial nature of innate heat. The diversity of opinions about astrology reflected Venice's divided politics and multiple approaches to interpreting Aristotle and other authorities.

多年来,在帕多瓦大学的艺术学院里,大约1600名教授就占星术的可靠性、神秘天体影响的存在以及天体热量存在于活体中的观点进行了辩论。从1570年代到1620年代,艺术学院的许多教授反对占星术和让·费内尔关于星体本体的理论。Girolamo Mercuriale、Alessandro Massaria和Eustachio Rudio认为某些形式的星体因果关系和Fernel的思想与他们对疾病的观察、亚里士多德的哲学和希波克拉底理论不兼容。后来,Santorio Santorio和Cesare Cremonini,他们与Paolo Sarpi的政治圈子结盟,对占星术进行了争论。他们的著作表明,在帕多瓦,医学理论与亚里士多德宇宙学联系在一起,亚里士多德宇宙学强调天体和地球元素之间的不可通约性。然而,他们对占星术的排斥并没有导致占星术在帕多瓦完全边缘化。到16世纪20年代中期,随着威尼斯政治气候的变化,帕多瓦大学聘请了教授,他们推广占星术和费内尔关于先天热的天体性质的理论。关于占星术的观点的多样性反映了威尼斯分裂的政治以及解读亚里士多德和其他权威的多种方法。
{"title":"Medicine and the heavens in Padua's Faculty of Arts, 1570-1630.","authors":"Craig Martin","doi":"10.1017/S0007087422000152","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087422000152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the faculty of arts at the University of Padua in the years around 1600 professors debated the reliability of astrology, the existence of occult celestial influences, and the idea that celestial heat is present in living bodies. From the 1570s to the 1620s many professors in the faculty of arts pushed back against astrology and Jean Fernel's theories surrounding astral body. Girolamo Mercuriale, Alessandro Massaria and Eustachio Rudio thought that some forms of astral causation and Fernel's ideas were incompatible with their observations of disease, Aristotle's philosophy and Hippocratic theories. Later, Santorio Santorio and Cesare Cremonini, who were allied to the political circle of Paolo Sarpi, polemicized against astrology. Their writings show that at Padua medical theory was linked to Aristotelian cosmology, which emphasized the incommensurability between celestial and terrestrial elements. Their rejection of astrology, however, did not lead to the complete marginalization of astrology at Padua. By the middle of the 1620s, as the political climate changed in Venice, the University of Padua hired professors who promoted astrology and Fernel's theories about the celestial nature of innate heat. The diversity of opinions about astrology reflected Venice's divided politics and multiple approaches to interpreting Aristotle and other authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42379856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'Not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation': the life of a quotation in biology. “不是出生、婚姻或死亡,而是原肠胚形成”:这是生物学中的一句名言。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087421000790
Nick Hopwood

This history of a statement attributed to the developmental biologist Lewis Wolpert exemplifies the making and uses of quotations in recent science. Wolpert's dictum, 'It is not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation which is truly the most important time in your life', was produced in a series of international shifts of medium and scale. It originated in his vivid declaration in conversation with a non-specialist at a workshop dinner, gained its canonical form in a colleague's monograph, and was amplified as a quotation on a poster derived from an undergraduate project. Although it drew on Wolpert's authority and he accepted his authorship, it thus represents a collective sifting of earlier claims for the significance of prenatal existence through the values of 1980s developmental biology. Juxtaposing a technical term with major life events has let teachers engage students, and researchers entice journalists, while sharing an in-joke that came to mark community identity. Serious applications include arguing for an extension of the fourteen-day limit on human-embryo research. On this evidence, quotations have been kept busy addressing every audience of specialized knowledge.

这段出自发育生物学家刘易斯·沃尔珀特(Lewis Wolpert)之手的陈述史是近代科学中引文的制作和使用的例证。沃尔珀特的名言“人生中最重要的时刻不是出生、结婚或死亡,而是胚期”,是在一系列中等规模的国际转移中产生的。它起源于他在一次研讨会晚宴上与一位非专业人士交谈时的生动陈述,在一位同事的专著中获得了规范形式,并被放大为来自本科生项目的海报上的引文。虽然它借鉴了Wolpert的权威,他也接受了他的作者身份,但它代表了通过20世纪80年代发育生物学的价值观对产前存在的重要性的早期主张的集体筛选。将一个专业术语与重大生活事件并列,让教师吸引了学生,研究人员吸引了记者,同时分享了一个标志着社区身份的内部笑话。严重的应用包括争论延长人类胚胎研究的14天限制。基于这一证据,引文一直忙于向每一位具有专业知识的听众讲话。
{"title":"'Not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation': the life of a quotation in biology.","authors":"Nick Hopwood","doi":"10.1017/S0007087421000790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087421000790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This history of a statement attributed to the developmental biologist Lewis Wolpert exemplifies the making and uses of quotations in recent science. Wolpert's dictum, 'It is not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation which is truly the most important time in your life', was produced in a series of international shifts of medium and scale. It originated in his vivid declaration in conversation with a non-specialist at a workshop dinner, gained its canonical form in a colleague's monograph, and was amplified as a quotation on a poster derived from an undergraduate project. Although it drew on Wolpert's authority and he accepted his authorship, it thus represents a collective sifting of earlier claims for the significance of prenatal existence through the values of 1980s developmental biology. Juxtaposing a technical term with major life events has let teachers engage students, and researchers entice journalists, while sharing an in-joke that came to mark community identity. Serious applications include arguing for an extension of the fourteen-day limit on human-embryo research. On this evidence, quotations have been kept busy addressing every audience of specialized knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39834298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
'The troubles of collecting': William Henry Harvey and the practicalities of natural-history collecting in Britain's nineteenth-century world. 收藏的烦恼":威廉-亨利-哈维与十九世纪英国世界自然历史收藏的实用性。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087421000704
John McAleer

In recent decades, historians have become increasingly interested in the logistical challenges and difficulties encountered by those responsible for the collection, preservation and safe transport of specimens from the field to the museum or laboratory. This article builds on this trend by looking beyond apparent successes to consider the practices and practicalities of shipboard travel and maritime and coastal collecting activities. The discussion focuses on the example of William Henry Harvey, who travelled to Australia in pursuit of cryptogams - non-flowering plants like mosses, lichens and algae - in 1853. In his private correspondence to family and friends, Harvey offered insights into the challenges and obstacles faced by all collectors in the period. His experiences were fundamentally shaped by the material culture, embodied knowledge and physical constraints he encountered on the way. On one level, shipboard and onshore collecting activities were facilitated by the connections forged by new technologies and Britain's global empire. But they also depended on specific contexts and relied on local agents and actors, as well as on the physical and technical facilities (and limitations) of those doing the collecting. The examples of Harvey and others shed light on the real, 'lived' experiences of individual collectors, the difficulties and challenges they encountered in amassing their collections, and the networks of people on which they relied.

近几十年来,历史学家越来越关注那些负责将标本从野外采集、保存和安全运输到博物馆或实验室的人员在后勤方面遇到的挑战和困难。本文在这一趋势的基础上,超越表面的成功,考虑了船上旅行以及海上和沿海采集活动的实践和实际情况。讨论的重点是威廉-亨利-哈维(William Henry Harvey)的例子,他于 1853 年前往澳大利亚寻找隐花植物--苔藓、地衣和藻类等非开花植物。在他与家人和朋友的私人通信中,哈维深入剖析了当时所有收藏者所面临的挑战和障碍。他的经历从根本上说是由他在旅途中遇到的物质文化、体现知识和物理限制所塑造的。从某种程度上说,新技术和英国的全球帝国所建立的联系为船上和岸上的收藏活动提供了便利。但它们也取决于具体的环境,依赖于当地的代理人和参与者,以及从事收藏者的物质和技术设施(和限制)。哈维等人的例子揭示了收藏家个人真实的 "生活 "经历、他们在积累藏品时遇到的困难和挑战,以及他们所依赖的人际网络。
{"title":"'The troubles of collecting': William Henry Harvey and the practicalities of natural-history collecting in Britain's nineteenth-century world.","authors":"John McAleer","doi":"10.1017/S0007087421000704","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0007087421000704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, historians have become increasingly interested in the logistical challenges and difficulties encountered by those responsible for the collection, preservation and safe transport of specimens from the field to the museum or laboratory. This article builds on this trend by looking beyond apparent successes to consider the practices and practicalities of shipboard travel and maritime and coastal collecting activities. The discussion focuses on the example of William Henry Harvey, who travelled to Australia in pursuit of cryptogams - non-flowering plants like mosses, lichens and algae - in 1853. In his private correspondence to family and friends, Harvey offered insights into the challenges and obstacles faced by all collectors in the period. His experiences were fundamentally shaped by the material culture, embodied knowledge and physical constraints he encountered on the way. On one level, shipboard and onshore collecting activities were facilitated by the connections forged by new technologies and Britain's global empire. But they also depended on specific contexts and relied on local agents and actors, as well as on the physical and technical facilities (and limitations) of those doing the collecting. The examples of Harvey and others shed light on the real, 'lived' experiences of individual collectors, the difficulties and challenges they encountered in amassing their collections, and the networks of people on which they relied.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39733252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Denis Papin's digester and its eighteenth-century European circulation. 丹尼斯·帕潘的消化器及其在18世纪的欧洲流通。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087421000698
Marco Storni

The digester, invented by Denis Papin in the 1680s, was a rudimentary pressure cooker used to soften hard bodies by boiling them at high pressure. In this paper, I propose a reassessment of Papin's work on the digester, arguing that his research was located at the intersection of the chemical laboratory and cooking practice. I then examine cases from the eighteenth-century European circulation of the instrument in Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands in order to showcase the different practices in which the digester was embedded, including chemical research, philanthropic projects to feed the destitute, and proposals for the improvement of home cooking. The digester's history represents a key episode for demonstrating the intertwined nature of natural-philosophical research and the practice of economy or 'thrift'. All users of the digester engaged in a rationalization of its functions through quantification, not only to fulfil a concern for precision but also to display the device's potential to reform practical daily life. The digester could save time and fuel, reduce material waste, make cooking easier and foster collective meal preparation for the needy.

蒸煮器是丹尼斯·帕潘在17世纪80年代发明的,是一种基本的高压锅,通过高压煮沸来软化坚硬的物体。在本文中,我建议重新评估帕平在消化器上的工作,认为他的研究位于化学实验室和烹饪实践的交叉点。然后,我研究了18世纪欧洲在瑞典、意大利和荷兰的消化器流通案例,以展示消化器被嵌入的不同实践,包括化学研究、为穷人提供食物的慈善项目,以及改进家庭烹饪的建议。消化器的历史是展示自然哲学研究与节约或“节俭”实践交织在一起的本质的关键章节。蒸煮器的所有用户都通过量化来实现其功能的合理化,这不仅是为了满足对精度的关注,也是为了展示该设备改革实际日常生活的潜力。蒸煮器可以节省时间和燃料,减少材料浪费,使烹饪更容易,并促进为有需要的人集体做饭。
{"title":"Denis Papin's digester and its eighteenth-century European circulation.","authors":"Marco Storni","doi":"10.1017/S0007087421000698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087421000698","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The digester, invented by Denis Papin in the 1680s, was a rudimentary pressure cooker used to soften hard bodies by boiling them at high pressure. In this paper, I propose a reassessment of Papin's work on the digester, arguing that his research was located at the intersection of the chemical laboratory and cooking practice. I then examine cases from the eighteenth-century European circulation of the instrument in Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands in order to showcase the different practices in which the digester was embedded, including chemical research, philanthropic projects to feed the destitute, and proposals for the improvement of home cooking. The digester's history represents a key episode for demonstrating the intertwined nature of natural-philosophical research and the practice of economy or 'thrift'. All users of the digester engaged in a rationalization of its functions through quantification, not only to fulfil a concern for precision but also to display the device's potential to reform practical daily life. The digester could save time and fuel, reduce material waste, make cooking easier and foster collective meal preparation for the needy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":"54 4","pages":"443-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39504137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Mathematics in the archives: deconstructive historiography and the shaping of modern geometry (1837-1852). 档案中的数学:解构史学和现代几何的形成(1837-1852)。
IF 0.8 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0007087421000625
Nicolas Michel, Ivahn Smadja

This essay explores the research practice of French geometer Michel Chasles (1793-1880), from his 1837 Aperçu historique up to the preparation of his courses on 'higher geometry' between 1846 and 1852. It argues that this scientific pursuit was jointly carried out on a historiographical and a mathematical terrain. Epistemic techniques such as the archival search for and comparison of manuscripts, the deconstructive historiography of past geometrical methods, and the epistemologically motivated periodization of the history of mathematics are shown to have played a crucial role in the shaping of Chasles's own theories. In particular, we present Chasles's approach to the 'material history' of algebraic symbolism and argue that it motivated and informed his subsequent invention of a novel notational technology for the writing of geometrical proofs and propositions. In return, this technology allowed Chasles to carry out a programme for the modernization of geometry in keeping with epistemic requirements he had also delineated via a form of historical writing.

本文探讨了法国几何学家Michel Chasles(1793-1880)的研究实践,从他1837年的aperaperu historque到1846年至1852年他的“高等几何”课程的准备。它认为,这种科学追求是在史学和数学领域共同进行的。认识论技术,如对手稿的档案搜索和比较,过去几何方法的解构历史编纂,以及认识论驱动的数学历史分期,在塑造查尔斯自己的理论中发挥了至关重要的作用。特别地,我们介绍了查尔斯对代数符号的“物质历史”的研究方法,并认为这激发并影响了他后来发明的一种新的符号技术,用于书写几何证明和命题。作为回报,这种技术使查尔斯能够执行几何现代化的计划,与他通过历史写作形式描绘的认识要求保持一致。
{"title":"Mathematics in the archives: deconstructive historiography and the shaping of modern geometry (1837-1852).","authors":"Nicolas Michel,&nbsp;Ivahn Smadja","doi":"10.1017/S0007087421000625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087421000625","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay explores the research practice of French geometer Michel Chasles (1793-1880), from his 1837 Aperçu historique up to the preparation of his courses on 'higher geometry' between 1846 and 1852. It argues that this scientific pursuit was jointly carried out on a historiographical and a mathematical terrain. Epistemic techniques such as the archival search for and comparison of manuscripts, the deconstructive historiography of past geometrical methods, and the epistemologically motivated periodization of the history of mathematics are shown to have played a crucial role in the shaping of Chasles's own theories. In particular, we present Chasles's approach to the 'material history' of algebraic symbolism and argue that it motivated and informed his subsequent invention of a novel notational technology for the writing of geometrical proofs and propositions. In return, this technology allowed Chasles to carry out a programme for the modernization of geometry in keeping with epistemic requirements he had also delineated via a form of historical writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":"54 4","pages":"423-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39393868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
British Journal for the History of Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1