Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892297
S. Whitfield
{"title":"Chipping away at Jim Crow","authors":"S. Whitfield","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892297","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892297","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42271859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2021.1950892
D. Bloxham
ABSTRACT This essay offers a set of reflections concerning relations between past and present and the necessity, propriety, and process of making value judgements about the past. Mobilizing a range of insights from figures as diverse as Blaise Pascal, Bernard Williams, and R. G. Collingwood, the discussion highlights some of the pitfalls and inconsistencies of the naïve celebration or condemnation of historical actors and their deeds, and underlines what is at stake when seeking to come to terms with an ambivalent inheritance from past generations.
{"title":"6 Past in present","authors":"D. Bloxham","doi":"10.1080/0031322x.2021.1950892","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322x.2021.1950892","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay offers a set of reflections concerning relations between past and present and the necessity, propriety, and process of making value judgements about the past. Mobilizing a range of insights from figures as diverse as Blaise Pascal, Bernard Williams, and R. G. Collingwood, the discussion highlights some of the pitfalls and inconsistencies of the naïve celebration or condemnation of historical actors and their deeds, and underlines what is at stake when seeking to come to terms with an ambivalent inheritance from past generations.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49386954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892312
Diya Gupta
{"title":"War through the eyes of the colonized","authors":"Diya Gupta","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892312","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1892312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45872471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1899612
R. Suny
{"title":"Red and White antisemitism","authors":"R. Suny","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1899612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1899612","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1899612","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42531914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1950316
T. Kushner
ABSTRACT Through a range of local and national examples, Kushner explores how Britain has dealt with difficult histories, especially relating to racism, slavery and antisemitism. By utilizing insights from the history of emotions and the senses, he explores how the murder of George Floyd in the Covid-19 summer of 2020 brought to the fore issues of commemoration and belonging that have never been confronted and contested so intensively and heatedly before. His article argues for a bold response that is not afraid, through due process, to remove heritage that is deeply offensive, while recognizing the importance of ambiguity and complexity in re-representing and confronting troubling pasts, including the representation of perpetrators. In working towards a post-Covid-19 world, Kushner argues against returning to the ‘norm’ and instead towards a heritage and history that is sensitive, critical and inclusive, recognizing the presence of migrants in Britain, past and present.
{"title":"5 The summer of 2020: memorialization under Covid-19 and Black Lives Matter","authors":"T. Kushner","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1950316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1950316","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through a range of local and national examples, Kushner explores how Britain has dealt with difficult histories, especially relating to racism, slavery and antisemitism. By utilizing insights from the history of emotions and the senses, he explores how the murder of George Floyd in the Covid-19 summer of 2020 brought to the fore issues of commemoration and belonging that have never been confronted and contested so intensively and heatedly before. His article argues for a bold response that is not afraid, through due process, to remove heritage that is deeply offensive, while recognizing the importance of ambiguity and complexity in re-representing and confronting troubling pasts, including the representation of perpetrators. In working towards a post-Covid-19 world, Kushner argues against returning to the ‘norm’ and instead towards a heritage and history that is sensitive, critical and inclusive, recognizing the presence of migrants in Britain, past and present.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48742443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322x.2021.1942402
Steve. Poole
ABSTRACT Poole’s essay explores a number of historical precedents for today’s debates concerning statuary memorialization. Early-nineteenth-century radicals shared many of the same discussions and tactics that feature in modern controversies over memorial statuary, especially concerning ways of countering the triumphalism and elitism of commemorative projects. The difficulties associated in particular with memorializing progressive causes and subaltern heroes produced responses as varied and unsatisfactory in the nineteenth century as they do today, just as the need to generate and maintain commemorative consensus often produces anodyne and uninspiring memorials.
{"title":"4 ‘The instinct for hero worship works blindly’: English radical democrats and the problem of memorialization","authors":"Steve. Poole","doi":"10.1080/0031322x.2021.1942402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322x.2021.1942402","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Poole’s essay explores a number of historical precedents for today’s debates concerning statuary memorialization. Early-nineteenth-century radicals shared many of the same discussions and tactics that feature in modern controversies over memorial statuary, especially concerning ways of countering the triumphalism and elitism of commemorative projects. The difficulties associated in particular with memorializing progressive causes and subaltern heroes produced responses as varied and unsatisfactory in the nineteenth century as they do today, just as the need to generate and maintain commemorative consensus often produces anodyne and uninspiring memorials.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43778251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1890362
Sadie Chana
The aim of (B)ordering Britain is to position current British immigration law in a postcolonial context. Its central project is to inform readers that current immigration law and understandings of ...
(B)命令英国的目的是将现行的英国移民法置于后殖民背景下。它的中心目的是告诉读者当前的移民法和对…
{"title":"The postcolonial roots of the ‘hostile environment’","authors":"Sadie Chana","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1890362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1890362","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of (B)ordering Britain is to position current British immigration law in a postcolonial context. Its central project is to inform readers that current immigration law and understandings of ...","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1890362","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44672520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-19DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1889153
Elsa Oommen
Why Race Still Matters is a persuasive and exhaustive study of how race pervades our societies. The author, Alana Lentin, has crafted this book in race critical scholarship with meticulous attention to the world around us. It begins with an urgent focus on the everyday violence faced by black and minority ethnic communities as they go about their daily lives, using the example of the Christchurch mosque killing of fifty-one Muslim people from South Asian and African diasporas by an ‘eco-fascist’ white Australian (15 March 2019). This massacre went on grimly to inspire further deadly attacks on vulnerable communities in several parts of the world: El Paso massacre (3 August 2019), Oslo shootings (10 August 2019) and Halle killings (9 October 2019). Lentin jolts our minds from the very first page to assert that race matters in our contemporary world, and always has, because the acts committed in its name are capable of revealing the ‘vulnerability to premature death’ of those deemed racially Other. In particular, the book is critical of the idea that calling out racism amounts to racism. Lentin builds a compelling case for the notion that race is a technology of modern rule, ‘the main goal of which is the production, reproduction, and maintenance of white supremacy on both a local and a planetary level’ (5). In the above characterization of race, she draws from the scholarship of Stuart Hall, Alexander Weheliye and Ruth Gilmore, among others. She provides a detailed discussion on how, despite being a social construct, race still gets enacted and lived through bodies and is constantly linked to practices of racism. The book is a clear exposition of how race has been made to appear insignificant in certain strands of scholarship and popular culture, and why this is dangerous and must be resisted at all costs. Lentin does this by dividing the book into four thematic chapters. She uses the first chapter entitled ‘Race beyond Social Constructionism’ to discuss snippets from public discourse, such as television interviews and developments in academic scholarship, to discredit resurgent efforts at ‘race realism’. While reiterating that race does not have a biological basis,
{"title":"Race matters","authors":"Elsa Oommen","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2021.1889153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1889153","url":null,"abstract":"Why Race Still Matters is a persuasive and exhaustive study of how race pervades our societies. The author, Alana Lentin, has crafted this book in race critical scholarship with meticulous attention to the world around us. It begins with an urgent focus on the everyday violence faced by black and minority ethnic communities as they go about their daily lives, using the example of the Christchurch mosque killing of fifty-one Muslim people from South Asian and African diasporas by an ‘eco-fascist’ white Australian (15 March 2019). This massacre went on grimly to inspire further deadly attacks on vulnerable communities in several parts of the world: El Paso massacre (3 August 2019), Oslo shootings (10 August 2019) and Halle killings (9 October 2019). Lentin jolts our minds from the very first page to assert that race matters in our contemporary world, and always has, because the acts committed in its name are capable of revealing the ‘vulnerability to premature death’ of those deemed racially Other. In particular, the book is critical of the idea that calling out racism amounts to racism. Lentin builds a compelling case for the notion that race is a technology of modern rule, ‘the main goal of which is the production, reproduction, and maintenance of white supremacy on both a local and a planetary level’ (5). In the above characterization of race, she draws from the scholarship of Stuart Hall, Alexander Weheliye and Ruth Gilmore, among others. She provides a detailed discussion on how, despite being a social construct, race still gets enacted and lived through bodies and is constantly linked to practices of racism. The book is a clear exposition of how race has been made to appear insignificant in certain strands of scholarship and popular culture, and why this is dangerous and must be resisted at all costs. Lentin does this by dividing the book into four thematic chapters. She uses the first chapter entitled ‘Race beyond Social Constructionism’ to discuss snippets from public discourse, such as television interviews and developments in academic scholarship, to discredit resurgent efforts at ‘race realism’. While reiterating that race does not have a biological basis,","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2021.1889153","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46493442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-07DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2020.1857047
Reza Zia-Ebrahimi
ABSTRACT Denial of Islamophobia as a form of racism is widespread among French intellectual and political elites. Time and again it has been claimed in op-eds, talk shows, investigative journalistic work and even in full-length books devoted to the topic that the invocation of Islamophobia is part of an Islamist conspiracy to ‘silence legitimate criticism of Islam’, and no less than a threat to ‘republican values’ and laïcité (laicism). Even anti-racist activists would want to see the term ‘banished’, and academic dictionaries of racism see in it a tool of ‘blackmail’ and ‘intimidation’. Though what I call ‘Islamophobia denial’ can be observed across the western world, France is exceptional on two accounts: first, virulent denial is the most common mainstream posture on Islamophobia, transcending traditional political camps, whereas in other parts of the western world denial is more localized on the right and the far right. Second, the argumentative toolbox of Islamophobia denial, a consistent if problematic set of assertions and allegations to be found in all its global iterations, from the United States to Scandinavia, was developed in France and proceeds from the specific intellectual history of the ‘Muslim question’ in that country. It is that history of origins, development and reception that this article sets out to analyse.
{"title":"The French origins of ‘Islamophobia denial’","authors":"Reza Zia-Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1080/0031322X.2020.1857047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2020.1857047","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Denial of Islamophobia as a form of racism is widespread among French intellectual and political elites. Time and again it has been claimed in op-eds, talk shows, investigative journalistic work and even in full-length books devoted to the topic that the invocation of Islamophobia is part of an Islamist conspiracy to ‘silence legitimate criticism of Islam’, and no less than a threat to ‘republican values’ and laïcité (laicism). Even anti-racist activists would want to see the term ‘banished’, and academic dictionaries of racism see in it a tool of ‘blackmail’ and ‘intimidation’. Though what I call ‘Islamophobia denial’ can be observed across the western world, France is exceptional on two accounts: first, virulent denial is the most common mainstream posture on Islamophobia, transcending traditional political camps, whereas in other parts of the western world denial is more localized on the right and the far right. Second, the argumentative toolbox of Islamophobia denial, a consistent if problematic set of assertions and allegations to be found in all its global iterations, from the United States to Scandinavia, was developed in France and proceeds from the specific intellectual history of the ‘Muslim question’ in that country. It is that history of origins, development and reception that this article sets out to analyse.","PeriodicalId":46766,"journal":{"name":"Patterns of Prejudice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0031322X.2020.1857047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42998297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：