首页 > 最新文献

METAPHILOSOPHY最新文献

英文 中文
Outgrowing representationalism: Semantic remarks on Tracy Llanera's Richard Rorty: Outgrowing modern nihilism 超越具象主义:对特雷西·拉内拉《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》的语义评论
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12636
Yvonne Huetter-Almerigi

This article provides a semantic reading of Tracy Llanera's brilliant book Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism. Llanera is reframing the debate of how to react to the malaise of modern nihilism by proposing a change of metaphor: instead of trying to “overcome” nihilism, we should try to “outgrow” nihilism. This article invites Llanera to shed more light on her project with respect to the semantic categories of realism and representationalism, and with respect to the growing field of conceptual engineering. Can Llanera's project be fruitfully understood as engineering the concepts of “transcendence” and “redemption”? How much of the project hangs on the idea that language does not represent but is rather a tool that helps us fulfill our varying needs? How neat is the entanglement of semantic and existential meaning?

本文对特雷西·拉内拉的杰出著作《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》进行了语义解读。Llanera通过提出一种隐喻的改变,重新构建了如何应对现代虚无主义弊病的辩论:我们应该尝试“超越”虚无主义,而不是试图“克服”虚无主义。本文邀请Llanera就现实主义和代表主义的语义范畴以及概念工程领域的发展,对她的项目进行更多的阐述。Llanera的项目是否可以被有效地理解为“超越”和“救赎”的概念?这个项目在多大程度上依赖于语言并不代表而是一种帮助我们满足各种需求的工具这一观点?语义意义和存在意义的纠缠有多清晰?
{"title":"Outgrowing representationalism: Semantic remarks on Tracy Llanera's Richard Rorty: Outgrowing modern nihilism","authors":"Yvonne Huetter-Almerigi","doi":"10.1111/meta.12636","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12636","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides a semantic reading of Tracy Llanera's brilliant book <i>Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism</i>. Llanera is reframing the debate of how to react to the malaise of modern nihilism by proposing a change of metaphor: instead of trying to “overcome” nihilism, we should try to “outgrow” nihilism. This article invites Llanera to shed more light on her project with respect to the semantic categories of realism and representationalism, and with respect to the growing field of conceptual engineering. Can Llanera's project be fruitfully understood as engineering the concepts of “transcendence” and “redemption”? How much of the project hangs on the idea that language does not represent but is rather a tool that helps us fulfill our varying needs? How neat is the entanglement of semantic and existential meaning?</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"442-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44280850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A socio-epistemological program for the philosophy of regulatory science 监管科学哲学的社会认识论程序
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12642
Guillermo Marín Penella

This paper presents a program of action for the philosophy of regulatory science, based on a general theory of social epistemology. Two candidates are considered. The first one, offered by Alvin Goldman, is not fit for our purposes because it is focused on a veritism incompatible with non-epistemic aims of regulatory science. The second, championed by Steve Fuller, sociologically investigates the existing means of producing knowledge, to modify them with the goal of obtaining democratic aims through action on a legislative meta-level. The program has been built upon this procedure, instantiated by the identification, characterization, and modification of epistemic policies.

本文以社会认识论的一般理论为基础,提出了监管科学哲学的行动纲领。考虑两名候选人。Alvin Goldman提出的第一个不符合我们的目的,因为它关注的是与监管科学的非认识目标不兼容的真理主义。第二种是由史蒂夫·富勒倡导的,从社会学角度调查现有的生产知识的手段,对其进行修改,目的是通过立法元层面的行动获得民主目标。该程序建立在这个过程之上,通过识别、表征和修改认知策略来实例化。
{"title":"A socio-epistemological program for the philosophy of regulatory science","authors":"Guillermo Marín Penella","doi":"10.1111/meta.12642","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12642","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a program of action for the philosophy of regulatory science, based on a general theory of social epistemology. Two candidates are considered. The first one, offered by Alvin Goldman, is not fit for our purposes because it is focused on a veritism incompatible with non-epistemic aims of regulatory science. The second, championed by Steve Fuller, sociologically investigates the existing means of producing knowledge, to modify them with the goal of obtaining democratic aims through action on a legislative meta-level. The program has been built upon this procedure, instantiated by the identification, characterization, and modification of epistemic policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"480-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12642","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50123894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A socio‐epistemological program for the philosophy of regulatory science 调控科学哲学的社会认识论程序
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12642
Guillermo Marín Penella
{"title":"A socio‐epistemological program for the philosophy of regulatory science","authors":"Guillermo Marín Penella","doi":"10.1111/meta.12642","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12642","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63425366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rortyan therapists, pragmatist engineers, and white nationalist egotists: A response to Huckerby, Huetter-Almerigi, and Showler 罗蒂安治疗师、实用主义工程师和白人民族主义者:对哈克比、休特-阿尔梅里吉和肖勒的回应
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12639
Tracy Llanera

This essay is a reply to commentaries by Elin Danielsen Huckerby, Yvonne Huetter-Almerigi, and Paul Showler on Tracy Llanera's Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism (2020).

本文是对Elin Danielsen Huckerby、Yvonne hutter - almerigi和Paul Showler对Tracy Llanera的《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》(2020)的评论的回复。
{"title":"Rortyan therapists, pragmatist engineers, and white nationalist egotists: A response to Huckerby, Huetter-Almerigi, and Showler","authors":"Tracy Llanera","doi":"10.1111/meta.12639","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12639","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay is a reply to commentaries by Elin Danielsen Huckerby, Yvonne Huetter-Almerigi, and Paul Showler on Tracy Llanera's <i>Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism</i> (2020).</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"453-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46575963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Socialising epistemic risk: On the risks of epistemic injustice 社会化认识风险:论认识不公正的风险
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12640
Veli Mitova

Epistemic risk is of central importance to epistemology nowadays: one common way in which a belief can fail to be knowledge is by being formed in an epistemically risky way, that is, a way that makes it true by luck. Recently, epistemologists have been expanding this rather narrow conception of risk in every direction, except arguably the most obvious one—to enable it to accommodate the increasingly commonplace thought that knowledge has an irreducibly social dimension. This paper fills this lacuna by bringing issues of epistemic injustice to bear on epistemic risk. In particular, it draws on the phenomenon of white ignorance, to sketch a more social notion of epistemic risk, on which the interests of one's epistemic community partly determine whether a belief-forming procedure is epistemically risky.

认识论风险是当今认识论的核心:一种信念可能不成为知识的常见方式是以一种认识论风险的方式形成,也就是说,一种靠运气实现的方式。最近,认识论者一直在向各个方向扩展这种相当狭窄的风险概念,除了可以说是最明显的一个——以使其能够适应日益普遍的思想,即知识具有不可减少的社会维度。本文通过将认识不公正问题纳入认识风险上来填补这一空白。特别是,它借鉴了白人无知的现象,描绘了一个更具社会性的认识风险概念,在这个概念上,一个人的认识社区的利益在一定程度上决定了信念形成过程是否具有认识风险。
{"title":"Socialising epistemic risk: On the risks of epistemic injustice","authors":"Veli Mitova","doi":"10.1111/meta.12640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12640","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epistemic risk is of central importance to epistemology nowadays: one common way in which a belief can fail to be knowledge is by being formed in an epistemically risky way, that is, a way that makes it true by luck. Recently, epistemologists have been expanding this rather narrow conception of risk in every direction, except arguably the most obvious one—to enable it to accommodate the increasingly commonplace thought that knowledge has an irreducibly social dimension. This paper fills this lacuna by bringing issues of epistemic injustice to bear on epistemic risk. In particular, it draws on the phenomenon of white ignorance, to sketch a more social notion of epistemic risk, on which the interests of one's epistemic community partly determine whether a belief-forming procedure is epistemically risky.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"539-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12640","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50139937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Redemption, transcendence, and spirituality, or ease, hope, and comfort? On Llanera's strong redescription of Rorty 救赎、超越和灵性,还是安逸、希望和舒适?论Llanera对罗蒂的强烈重新描述
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12637
Elin Danielsen Huckerby

In Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism, Tracy Llanera places Richard Rorty in conversation with philosophers confronting nihilism as a “malaise of modernity.” She shows how Rortyan thought offers a horizontal and relational approach to “redemption,” as opposed to religious or philosophical paths to be saved by higher beings or ideas. This essay focuses on Llanera's redescription of Rorty and whether amplifying Rorty's use of “redemption” and “transcendence” is wise. Leaving behind this laden vocabulary might better serve Llanera's purpose of illuminating a path to outgrow, rather than overcome, the anxiety of nihilism. After exploring Llanera's redescription of Rorty, the essay suggests that a different vocabulary—composed of words such as ease, hope, and comfort, and potentially as capable of supporting Llanera's overarching aim—is available in Rorty's writings. Turning to this other vocabulary might strengthen Llanera's significant contribution to the nihilism debate and to Rortyan and pragmatist philosophy more generally.

在《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》一书中,特雷西·拉内拉将理查德·罗蒂置于与哲学家的对话中,这些哲学家将虚无主义视为“现代性的弊病”。她展示了罗蒂安的思想如何为“救赎”提供了一种横向和关系的方法,而不是通过宗教或哲学途径被更高的存在或思想所拯救。本文关注的是Llanera对罗蒂的重新描述,以及放大罗蒂对“救赎”和“超越”的使用是否明智。把这些沉重的词汇抛在身后,可能更有利于Llanera的目的,即为摆脱虚无主义的焦虑指明一条道路,而不是克服它。在探索了Llanera对罗蒂的重新描述之后,本文认为在罗蒂的作品中可以找到一种不同的词汇——由安逸、希望和安慰等词组成,并且有可能支持Llanera的总体目标。转向其他词汇可能会加强Llanera对虚无主义辩论和罗蒂安和实用主义哲学的重大贡献。
{"title":"Redemption, transcendence, and spirituality, or ease, hope, and comfort? On Llanera's strong redescription of Rorty","authors":"Elin Danielsen Huckerby","doi":"10.1111/meta.12637","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12637","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <i>Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism</i>, Tracy Llanera places Richard Rorty in conversation with philosophers confronting nihilism as a “malaise of modernity.” She shows how Rortyan thought offers a horizontal and relational approach to “redemption,” as opposed to religious or philosophical paths to be saved by higher beings or ideas. This essay focuses on Llanera's redescription of Rorty and whether amplifying Rorty's use of “redemption” and “transcendence” is wise. Leaving behind this laden vocabulary might better serve Llanera's purpose of illuminating a path to outgrow, rather than overcome, the anxiety of nihilism. After exploring Llanera's redescription of Rorty, the essay suggests that a different vocabulary—composed of words such as ease, hope, and comfort, and potentially as capable of supporting Llanera's overarching aim—is available in Rorty's writings. Turning to this other vocabulary might strengthen Llanera's significant contribution to the nihilism debate and to Rortyan and pragmatist philosophy more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"429-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12637","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48647908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Take care of egotism, and redemption will take care of itself: Comments on Tracy Llanera's Richard Rorty: Outgrowing modern nihilism 照顾好利己主义,救赎就会照顾好自己——评特雷西·拉涅拉的《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12638
Paul D. G. Showler

This commentary critically examines two facets of Tracy Llanera's recent book Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism. First, it considers her interpretation of Richard Rorty's redemptive project. It argues that, while Llanera succeeds in resolving tensions in Rorty's public-private distinction, her account downplays the role of abnormal discourse within projects of self-creation. Second, it raises several questions about Llanera's strategy for situating this redemptive project within debates concerning existential nihilism. On her view, one ought to follow Rorty in addressing the problem of egotism instead of the problem of nihilism, since the former is prior to the latter. But it is not clear who counts as an egotist, or why egotists are especially prone to becoming nihilists. Moreover, there are reasons to think that egotism and nihilism are fundamentally different kinds of problems.

这篇评论批判性地审视了特雷西·拉内拉的新书《理查德·罗蒂:超越现代虚无主义》的两个方面。首先,它考虑了她对理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)救赎计划的解读。它认为,虽然Llanera成功地解决了罗蒂公私区分中的紧张关系,但她的叙述淡化了自我创造项目中异常话语的作用。其次,它提出了关于Llanera在关于存在虚无主义的辩论中定位这个救赎项目的策略的几个问题。在她看来,人们应该跟随罗蒂来解决利己主义问题,而不是虚无主义问题,因为前者先于后者。但目前尚不清楚谁是自我主义者,也不清楚为什么自我主义者特别容易成为虚无主义者。此外,有理由认为利己主义和虚无主义是根本不同的问题。
{"title":"Take care of egotism, and redemption will take care of itself: Comments on Tracy Llanera's Richard Rorty: Outgrowing modern nihilism","authors":"Paul D. G. Showler","doi":"10.1111/meta.12638","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12638","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary critically examines two facets of Tracy Llanera's recent book <i>Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern Nihilism</i>. First, it considers her interpretation of Richard Rorty's redemptive project. It argues that, while Llanera succeeds in resolving tensions in Rorty's public-private distinction, her account downplays the role of abnormal discourse within projects of self-creation. Second, it raises several questions about Llanera's strategy for situating this redemptive project within debates concerning existential nihilism. On her view, one ought to follow Rorty in addressing the problem of <i>egotism</i> instead of the problem of nihilism, since the former is prior to the latter. But it is not clear who counts as an egotist, or why egotists are especially prone to becoming nihilists. Moreover, there are reasons to think that egotism and nihilism are fundamentally different kinds of problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48443364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophy as a thief? 哲学是小偷?
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-11 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12635
Randall Auxier

This is a performative piece of writing in the presence of and inspired by Richard Shusterman's Philosophy and the Art of Writing. It tries to show that the relationship between the act of writing and the formation of our human consciousness (philosophical and, more deeply, poietic) is a developing and growing process through history, and before it. The dominance of an image consciousness was slowly challenged and then replaced by a linguistic consciousness with the advent of writing, and accelerated by the invention of printing and mass literacy. Shusterman teaches us an embodied kind of philosophizing that uses the word but isn't limited by it. This paper suggests that a return to image consciousness has already occurred and that the old book consciousness is disappearing. Lessons from the book consciousness are offered.

这是一篇受理查德·舒斯特曼的《哲学与写作艺术》启发的表演作品。它试图表明,写作行为与我们人类意识的形成(哲学的,更深入的是诗歌的)之间的关系是一个通过历史和之前发展和成长的过程。图像意识的主导地位慢慢受到挑战,然后随着文字的出现被语言意识所取代,并因印刷术和大众识字的发明而加速。舒斯特曼教给我们一种具体化的哲学思考,它使用这个词,但不受它的限制。本文认为,形象意识的回归已经发生,旧书意识正在消失。本书提供了书本意识的教训。
{"title":"Philosophy as a thief?","authors":"Randall Auxier","doi":"10.1111/meta.12635","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12635","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a performative piece of writing in the presence of and inspired by Richard Shusterman's <i>Philosophy and the Art of Writing</i>. It tries to show that the relationship between the act of writing and the formation of our human consciousness (philosophical and, more deeply, poietic) is a developing and growing process through history, and before it. The dominance of an image consciousness was slowly challenged and then replaced by a linguistic consciousness with the advent of writing, and accelerated by the invention of printing and mass literacy. Shusterman teaches us an embodied kind of philosophizing that uses the word but isn't limited by it. This paper suggests that a return to image consciousness has already occurred and that the old book consciousness is disappearing. Lessons from the book consciousness are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"390-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42918982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The poetic of reason: Introducing rational poetic experimentalism By Stefán Snævarr. Leiden: Brill, 2022. Pp. xii + 464 理性的诗意:引入理性的诗意实验主义StefánSnævarr。莱顿:布里尔,2022年。Pp. xii + 464
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-06-11 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12634
Richard Eldridge
{"title":"The poetic of reason: Introducing rational poetic experimentalism By Stefán Snævarr. Leiden: Brill, 2022. Pp. xii + 464","authors":"Richard Eldridge","doi":"10.1111/meta.12634","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12634","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"565-569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45382065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophy, writing, and liberation 哲学、写作与解放
IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12628
Richard Shusterman

In responding to the three creative interpretive discussions in the symposium on my book Philosophy and the Art of Writing, this paper explores the different styles of philosophical discourse and their role in the practice of philosophy as a way of life that extends beyond the discursive and that combines self-cultivation with care for others in the ethical-aesthetic pursuit of living beauty. In advocating this aesthetic model of philosophical life over a purely therapeutic model, I suggest how the former can incorporate the latter's concerns for spiritual health and liberation. In developing my response to the symposiasts while elaborating on the themes of my book, I consider issues of ineffability, creative performance, embodiment, truth, heroism, vulnerability, possession, art, spirituality, love, and liberation.

为了回应我在《哲学与写作艺术》一书的研讨会上的三种创造性的解释性讨论,本文探讨了哲学话语的不同风格及其在哲学实践中的作用,作为一种超越话语的生活方式,它将自我修养与对他人的关怀结合在对生活美的伦理美学追求中。在提倡这种哲学生活的美学模式而不是纯粹的治疗模式时,我建议前者如何结合后者对精神健康和解放的关注。在阐述我的书的主题的同时,我对研讨会的回应,我考虑了不可言说、创造性表演、化身、真理、英雄主义、脆弱、占有、艺术、灵性、爱和解放等问题。
{"title":"Philosophy, writing, and liberation","authors":"Richard Shusterman","doi":"10.1111/meta.12628","DOIUrl":"10.1111/meta.12628","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In responding to the three creative interpretive discussions in the symposium on my book <i>Philosophy and the Art of Writing</i>, this paper explores the different styles of philosophical discourse and their role in the practice of philosophy as a way of life that extends beyond the discursive and that combines self-cultivation with care for others in the ethical-aesthetic pursuit of living beauty. In advocating this aesthetic model of philosophical life over a purely therapeutic model, I suggest how the former can incorporate the latter's concerns for spiritual health and liberation. In developing my response to the symposiasts while elaborating on the themes of my book, I consider issues of ineffability, creative performance, embodiment, truth, heroism, vulnerability, possession, art, spirituality, love, and liberation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"54 4","pages":"415-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43754083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
METAPHILOSOPHY
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1