American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine最新文献

Introduction: Complementary health (CH) modalities can be used as part of a Lifestyle Medicine (LM) approach to preventing and managing chronic conditions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data for respondents to the 2020 (N = 6,715) and 2014/2015 (N = 11,112) cycles of a Northern California health plan member survey to estimate use in 2020 of five CH modalities relevant to LM: vegetarian/vegan diet, mind/body stress management techniques (MBSM), yoga/Pilates, massage therapy, and prayer/spiritual practice. Use was estimated by sex and racial/ethnic group (White, Black, Latino, Asian/PI)) for ages 35-64 and 65-79 years and for adults 35-79 years with diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, fair/poor sleep quality, and chronic stress. CH use in 2020 was compared to 2014/2015.

Results: In 2020, 53% of adults used ≥1 of these CH modalities, including 8.4% vegetarian/vegan diet, 25.8% MBSM, 23.7% prayer/spiritual practice, 16.5% yoga/Pilates, and 17.7% massage. Sex, age group, and racial/ethnic differences were seen in use of most CH modalities, and CH modality use varied by health condition. Significant increases from 2014/2015 to 2020 were seen in use of MBSM and yoga/Pilates, vegetarian/vegan diet, and prayer/spiritual practice.

Conclusion: There is substantial opportunity to increase use of CH modalities within a LM approach to preventing and managing chronic health conditions.

Objective: Present study explored the influence of self-reported health on diff between observable and unobservable health factors.

Method: Data obtained through the 2017-2020 pre-pandemic dataset of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A series of analyses of covariance were conducted with self-reported health as the independent variable, and measures of blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting glucose and total cholesterol as dependent variables. Family income served as a covariate.

Results: Results revealed significant differences in self-reported health and blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and fasting glucose. Individuals who rated their health excellent or very good tended to have better health numbers than those who rated their health as fair or poor. No statistically significant difference was found with self-reported health and cholesterol.

Conclusion: It is possible that health numbers that can be observed (or assessed) at home, without a health care professional, may be more aligned with how individuals perceive their own health. Health care professionals may want to further help patients recognize their own health status. The use of wearable technologies may provide added health information resulting in more accurate perception of health. A more accurate perception of a patient's own health may aid health care professionals in further improving patient care.

A call to action from the recently published Doha Declaration, including guiding principles for Lifestyle Medicine integration as an evolution to Lifestyle-First Medicine for global healthcare.

Dementia and cognitive decline pose significant global public health challenges, with prevalence expected to rise in the coming decades. Lifestyle medicine offers a promising approach to mitigating cognitive issues through six key interventions: diet, physical activity, restorative sleep, social connections, stress management, and avoiding risky substances. Traditional methods like randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have limitations in capturing the long-term impacts of these interventions. To overcome these challenges, the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) and the True Health Initiative (THI) developed the Hierarchies of Evidence Applied to Lifestyle Medicine (HEALM) framework, informed by the Evidence Threshold Pathway Mapping (ETPM) approach. This framework integrates diverse evidence sources to assess intervention effects over time. Applying HEALM, this review evaluates lifestyle factors' impact on dementia and cognitive decline. It finds strong evidence supporting plant-based nutrition, physical activity, restorative sleep, and avoiding risky substances in promoting cognitive health. Social connections may mitigate cognitive decline, while stress management requires further investigation due to inconclusive findings. Integrating these findings into public health strategies could effectively address the growing dementia burden and enhance overall well-being in aging populations, underscoring the need for continued research in cognitive health.

Older adults are often advised to engage in more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Although MVPA offers significant health benefits, focusing solely on MVPA may be difficult for many in this population due to their typically higher levels of sedentary behavior (SB). Increasing light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) can offer similar health benefits and be a more achievable starting point for inactive older adults. The 24-hour activity cycle provides a conceptual model that can assist healthcare providers in promoting physical activity. This model emphasizes the interaction between four key behaviors (i.e., sleep, sedentary behavior, LIPA, and MVPA) and presents a holistic approach to optimizing the balance of these activity behaviors. This article outlines strategies to help older adults increase their physical activity and reduce sedentary time within the 24-hour activity cycle, promoting sustainable, long-term behavior change in this population.

Background: Lifestyle medicine, a patient-centered approach promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, is an evidence-based tool for preventing and treating chronic diseases. It has been shown to reduce the burden of physical and psychological diseases. Despite this, clinical implementation is lagging, with physicians facing barriers effectively encouraging lifestyle change. Objective: This project studies the Lifestyle Medicine Assessment (LMA) tool regarding ease of implementation and influence on patient motivation, perception of lifestyle changes, and satisfaction. Methods: A two-pronged approach was conducted. First, the implementation time was recorded for multiple encounters (N = 42). Next, a different subset of patients (N = 22) receiving the LMA completed a pre- and post-encounter survey about their motivation to change, perception of lifestyle changes on well-being, and visit satisfaction. A control group (N = 21) also received these surveys. Results: The average time of application was 7.12 min. Intragroup scores for motivation to change were significantly higher in the LMA group post-intervention (p _LMA = .001), but not in the control group. Conclusion: These results show the potential benefits of the LMA tool in a clinical setting, demonstrating realistically achievable implementation times and increased patient motivation regarding better lifestyle choices. Providers should consider using the LMA tool to promote lifestyle change within their practice.

Introduction: Psychological distress can have a significant impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and efforts to treat psychological distress may improve CVD risk factors. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective feasibility of implementation study to assess the utilization of short-term psychotherapy in patients engaged in a cardiovascular prevention program. Methods: Participants included patients engaged in the Women's Health or Preventive Cardiology programs from January 2019 to June 2022. Patients were referred for psychology services if deemed likely to benefit from improvements in their psychological well-being to control their CVD risk factors. Biomarkers were obtained within 6 months pre- and post-therapy. Results: More than half (52.8%) of the 36 patients referred to the program attended ≥6 psychotherapy sessions. In patients with HTN, 50% were above goal (130/80 mmHg) pre-therapy and 20.8% post-therapy. 55.5% of patients with an LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL pre-therapy achieved an LDL-C <100 mg/dL post-therapy. Among patients with a hemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% pre-therapy, 12.5% lowered their hemoglobin A1c to <5.7%. Conclusion: Our study shows the potential benefit of psychological services when delivered concurrently with preventive cardiology visits. These findings raise the possibility that expanding access to psychology services in clinical cardiology care may be a model to reduce excess cardiovascular risk factor burdens.