American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine最新文献

Dementia and cognitive decline pose significant global public health challenges, with prevalence expected to rise in the coming decades. Lifestyle medicine offers a promising approach to mitigating cognitive issues through six key interventions: diet, physical activity, restorative sleep, social connections, stress management, and avoiding risky substances. Traditional methods like randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have limitations in capturing the long-term impacts of these interventions. To overcome these challenges, the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) and the True Health Initiative (THI) developed the Hierarchies of Evidence Applied to Lifestyle Medicine (HEALM) framework, informed by the Evidence Threshold Pathway Mapping (ETPM) approach. This framework integrates diverse evidence sources to assess intervention effects over time. Applying HEALM, this review evaluates lifestyle factors' impact on dementia and cognitive decline. It finds strong evidence supporting plant-based nutrition, physical activity, restorative sleep, and avoiding risky substances in promoting cognitive health. Social connections may mitigate cognitive decline, while stress management requires further investigation due to inconclusive findings. Integrating these findings into public health strategies could effectively address the growing dementia burden and enhance overall well-being in aging populations, underscoring the need for continued research in cognitive health.

Older adults are often advised to engage in more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Although MVPA offers significant health benefits, focusing solely on MVPA may be difficult for many in this population due to their typically higher levels of sedentary behavior (SB). Increasing light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) can offer similar health benefits and be a more achievable starting point for inactive older adults. The 24-hour activity cycle provides a conceptual model that can assist healthcare providers in promoting physical activity. This model emphasizes the interaction between four key behaviors (i.e., sleep, sedentary behavior, LIPA, and MVPA) and presents a holistic approach to optimizing the balance of these activity behaviors. This article outlines strategies to help older adults increase their physical activity and reduce sedentary time within the 24-hour activity cycle, promoting sustainable, long-term behavior change in this population.

Background: Lifestyle medicine, a patient-centered approach promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors, is an evidence-based tool for preventing and treating chronic diseases. It has been shown to reduce the burden of physical and psychological diseases. Despite this, clinical implementation is lagging, with physicians facing barriers effectively encouraging lifestyle change. Objective: This project studies the Lifestyle Medicine Assessment (LMA) tool regarding ease of implementation and influence on patient motivation, perception of lifestyle changes, and satisfaction. Methods: A two-pronged approach was conducted. First, the implementation time was recorded for multiple encounters (N = 42). Next, a different subset of patients (N = 22) receiving the LMA completed a pre- and post-encounter survey about their motivation to change, perception of lifestyle changes on well-being, and visit satisfaction. A control group (N = 21) also received these surveys. Results: The average time of application was 7.12 min. Intragroup scores for motivation to change were significantly higher in the LMA group post-intervention (p _LMA = .001), but not in the control group. Conclusion: These results show the potential benefits of the LMA tool in a clinical setting, demonstrating realistically achievable implementation times and increased patient motivation regarding better lifestyle choices. Providers should consider using the LMA tool to promote lifestyle change within their practice.

Introduction: Psychological distress can have a significant impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and efforts to treat psychological distress may improve CVD risk factors. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective feasibility of implementation study to assess the utilization of short-term psychotherapy in patients engaged in a cardiovascular prevention program. Methods: Participants included patients engaged in the Women's Health or Preventive Cardiology programs from January 2019 to June 2022. Patients were referred for psychology services if deemed likely to benefit from improvements in their psychological well-being to control their CVD risk factors. Biomarkers were obtained within 6 months pre- and post-therapy. Results: More than half (52.8%) of the 36 patients referred to the program attended ≥6 psychotherapy sessions. In patients with HTN, 50% were above goal (130/80 mmHg) pre-therapy and 20.8% post-therapy. 55.5% of patients with an LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL pre-therapy achieved an LDL-C <100 mg/dL post-therapy. Among patients with a hemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% pre-therapy, 12.5% lowered their hemoglobin A1c to <5.7%. Conclusion: Our study shows the potential benefit of psychological services when delivered concurrently with preventive cardiology visits. These findings raise the possibility that expanding access to psychology services in clinical cardiology care may be a model to reduce excess cardiovascular risk factor burdens.

Aging is a lifelong process, and many chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes are influenced by lifestyle factors. Here, we discuss the benefits of integrating education in geriatrics and lifestyle medicine to not only improve competency of health professions learners in each area, but also so that learners can promote healthy aging in the clinical care of their future patients. We review the current state of geriatrics education, the role of lifestyle medicine in aging, and strategies to bridge the gaps between geriatrics and lifestyle medicine.

Approximately 10 million individuals in the United States have osteoporosis and 44 million have low bone mineral density which puts them at risk for bone breaks. This presents a large burden on our health care system since about one-quarter of hip fracture patients never regain full function, need nursing care, and, for those over age 50, 24% die within one year. Oral bisphosphonates are often used as first-line therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis; however, patients frequently experience significant side effects. In addition, bisphosphonates inhibit bone loss by initiating apoptosis in osteoclasts that remove old bone, thus allowing old bone to accumulate and slowing the activity of osteoblasts that create new bone, thereby affecting bone quality. As an alternative, a bone-friendly lifestyle, including calcium and vitamin D consumption, exercise, smoking cessation, and a decrease in alcohol intake, may reduce bone loss. This case report describes lifestyle changes that included diet and exercise that increased bone mineral density in two years in a post-menopausal woman with no negative side effects.

Child lifestyle behaviors are influenced by their caregivers. Targeting the caregiver-child relationship can establish healthy habits, especially healthful eating patterns, in both the caregiver and child. The purpose of this study was to identify the context for addressing strategies used to establish nutritious eating for the caregiver and child taken together as a unit (e.g., the caregiver-child dyad), through the perspectives of nutrition-promoting professionals. We performed purposive sampling of professionals who address healthful nutrition. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to elicit perspectives on caregiver-child eating dynamics and techniques to produce dietary behavior change. Data were coded through the constant comparative method, and subthemes and themes were identified by grouping similar codes and excerpts. We identified four themes relevant to dyadic dietary behavior change: (1) factors to consider when approaching nutrition such as family dynamics, (2) dyad-specific strategies for dietary behavior change, (3) patient-centered approaches professionals implement in interactions with the dyad, and (4) time as a barrier to dietary behavior change. In conclusion, study is novel in eliciting the perspectives of professionals across multiple settings to provide a context for dyadic dietary behavior change. Future studies can focus on developing training for lifestyle medicine professionals to approach dyad-specific behavior modification.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced people to change their lifestyles. We examined dietary differences by job type and industry among workers during the pandemic. This cross-sectional study was conducted using data an internet survey. Job type and industry were classified into 3 and 22 groups, respectively. Dietary behaviors were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis nested in the workplace prefecture was conducted. Workers involved in jobs that required communication with people were more likely to skip breakfast (odds ratio [OR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.24) and had a lower meal frequency (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34) than workers engaged in desk work. Manual workers were more likely to eat fast food or meals (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17) than were those engaged in desk work. Workers in the newspaper, magazine, television, radio, advertising, and other mass media industries were more likely to skip breakfast (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.82-3.24) and have a lower meal frequency (OR: 3.90, 95% CI: 2.87-5.28) than workers in public offices and organizations. These results were partially consistent with trends reported before the pandemic. Further studies should be conducted to clarify the causes of differences in dietary behavior among workers.