Pub Date : 2023-11-10DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2280257
Anna E. Premo, Jennifer Lin Russell, Megan Duff
ABSTRACTImprovement networks are a relatively recent phenomenon in US education that create interorganizational networks of educators working together to improve specific educational problems. A shared emphasis of these networks is the use of data to support the improvement process, but little is known about their data use in practice. This study takes an in-depth look at the 800+ data artifacts created and used in a single focal network’s 3rd year, applying a mixed methods case study design. The findings show that while data artifacts are predominantly created to support the improvement process, they are frequently used for relationship management as network hub members navigate the sociopolitical dynamics typical of a complex change effort – if they are used at all. The study has implications for practitioners as they decide what data artifacts to create and use, as well as for researchers’ theory building about productive data use in improvement efforts.KEYWORDS: Improvement networksimprovement sciencecontinuous improvementdata use Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethical approvalEthical approval was obtained for this project from the University of Pittsburgh’s IRB: STUDY18120016.Data availability statementData not available – participant consent: The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research, supporting data are not available.Notes1 The Networks for School Improvement Initiative was launched by the Gates foundation in 2018 to support organizations bringing together and serving as intermediaries for networks of middle and high schools. These networks work together to improve high school graduation and college success rates for their Black and Latino students and students experiencing poverty through the use of continuous improvement methods, proven indicators of future student outcomes, and unwavering commitment to equity (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Citationn.d.). To date, the initiative has supported the formation and operation of over 40 networks for school improvement.2 The first and second authors of this study were both researchers in the focal network’s hub team, which afforded access to network information and special insight into network functioning. The first author was a graduate research assistant who joined the focal network in its 3rd year and continued as a network member through the end of the network’s 5th and final year. The second author was involved with the network from its initiation, serving as a faculty member affiliated with one of the research centers.3 Network hubs engage in a number of key processes associated with organizing and operating a high-functioning networked improvement community. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching has a framework for describing these hub functions, such as site-level improvement routines and capacity building.4 For 63
摘要改进网络是美国教育中一个相对较新的现象,它创造了教育者共同努力改善特定教育问题的组织间网络。这些网络的共同重点是使用数据来支持改进过程,但对其在实践中的数据使用知之甚少。本研究采用混合方法案例研究设计,深入研究了单一焦点网络创建和使用的800多个数据工件。研究结果表明,虽然数据工件主要是为了支持改进过程而创建的,但它们经常被用于关系管理,因为网络中心成员在复杂变革工作的典型社会政治动态中导航——如果它们被使用的话。该研究对决定创建和使用哪些数据工件的实践者以及研究人员在改进工作中关于生产性数据使用的理论构建具有启示意义。关键词:改进网络改进科学持续改进数据使用披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本项目已获得匹兹堡大学伦理委员会的伦理批准:STUDY18120016。数据可用性声明数据不可用-参与者同意:本研究的参与者没有书面同意公开分享他们的数据,因此由于研究的敏感性,支持数据不可用。注1“学校改善网络倡议”由盖茨基金会于2018年发起,旨在支持组织聚集在一起,并作为初中和高中网络的中介机构。这些网络共同努力,通过使用持续改进的方法、经过验证的未来学生成绩指标和坚定不移的公平承诺,提高黑人和拉丁裔学生和贫困学生的高中毕业率和大学成功率(比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会,Citationn.d)。迄今为止,该计划已支持40多个学校改善网络的成立和运作本研究的第一和第二作者都是焦点网络中心团队的研究人员,他们提供了访问网络信息和对网络功能的特殊见解。第一作者是一名研究生研究助理,他在焦点网络的第三年加入,并在网络的第五年也是最后一年结束时继续作为网络成员。第二名作者从网络建立之初就参与其中,是其中一个研究中心的教员网络集线器参与与组织和操作高功能网络改进社区相关的许多关键过程。卡内基教学促进基金会有一个描述这些中心功能的框架,比如站点级别的改进程序和能力建设对于63个工件(8%的样本),我们认为有一个强大的次要预期用途,并将次要用途包含到我们分析的组合预期用途变量中。虽然次要预期用途的纳入确实更准确地反映了焦点网络的多利益相关者环境的复杂性和紧张性,但它并没有显著影响我们的分析结果。本研究由比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会资助。这里所表达的发现和观点是作者的,不是基础的。作者简介anna E. Premo是匹兹堡大学学习科学与政策项目的博士候选人,也是学习研究与发展中心的研究生研究助理。她的研究兴趣包括组织学习,数据和测量的使用,以及研究与实践的伙伴关系,她努力将复杂的组织变革和转型重新定义为学习过程。她的职业生涯始于国际发展研究,在完成硕士学位后不久,她就获得了富布赖特奖学金,在南非进行研究。后来,她转行担任销售、交付和运营方面的战略和转型咨询。最近,她在一家跨国技术服务和咨询公司担任银行业业务转型的全球主管。她拥有麻省理工学院国际发展硕士学位和城市研究与规划学士学位。Jennifer Lin Russell是领导、政策和组织学教授,她的研究重点是组织教育系统以促进改进。
{"title":"From improvement to relationship management: a case study of data artifact creation and use in a school improvement network","authors":"Anna E. Premo, Jennifer Lin Russell, Megan Duff","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2280257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2280257","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTImprovement networks are a relatively recent phenomenon in US education that create interorganizational networks of educators working together to improve specific educational problems. A shared emphasis of these networks is the use of data to support the improvement process, but little is known about their data use in practice. This study takes an in-depth look at the 800+ data artifacts created and used in a single focal network’s 3rd year, applying a mixed methods case study design. The findings show that while data artifacts are predominantly created to support the improvement process, they are frequently used for relationship management as network hub members navigate the sociopolitical dynamics typical of a complex change effort – if they are used at all. The study has implications for practitioners as they decide what data artifacts to create and use, as well as for researchers’ theory building about productive data use in improvement efforts.KEYWORDS: Improvement networksimprovement sciencecontinuous improvementdata use Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethical approvalEthical approval was obtained for this project from the University of Pittsburgh’s IRB: STUDY18120016.Data availability statementData not available – participant consent: The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research, supporting data are not available.Notes1 The Networks for School Improvement Initiative was launched by the Gates foundation in 2018 to support organizations bringing together and serving as intermediaries for networks of middle and high schools. These networks work together to improve high school graduation and college success rates for their Black and Latino students and students experiencing poverty through the use of continuous improvement methods, proven indicators of future student outcomes, and unwavering commitment to equity (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Citationn.d.). To date, the initiative has supported the formation and operation of over 40 networks for school improvement.2 The first and second authors of this study were both researchers in the focal network’s hub team, which afforded access to network information and special insight into network functioning. The first author was a graduate research assistant who joined the focal network in its 3rd year and continued as a network member through the end of the network’s 5th and final year. The second author was involved with the network from its initiation, serving as a faculty member affiliated with one of the research centers.3 Network hubs engage in a number of key processes associated with organizing and operating a high-functioning networked improvement community. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching has a framework for describing these hub functions, such as site-level improvement routines and capacity building.4 For 63","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135136445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-17DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2246950
Luisa Grützmacher, Julia Holzer, Marko Lüftenegger, Barbara Schober, Manfred Prenzel
{"title":"The stimulation of school improvement processes: the orientation of development perspectives","authors":"Luisa Grützmacher, Julia Holzer, Marko Lüftenegger, Barbara Schober, Manfred Prenzel","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2246950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2246950","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42832142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-28DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2240318
C. Bokhove, John Jerrim, Sam Sims
School inspections are a common feature of education systems across the word. These involve trained professionals visiting schools and reaching a high-stakes judgement about the quality of education they provide. By their nature, school inspections rely upon professional judgement, with different inspectors potentially putting more emphasis on certain areas than others. Yet there is currently little academic evidence investigating the consistency of school inspections, including how judgements vary across inspectors with different characteristics. We present new empirical evidence on this matter, drawing upon data from more than 30,000 school inspections conducted in England between 2011 and 2019. Male inspectors are found to award slightly more lenient judgements to primary schools than their female counterparts, while permanent Ofsted employees (Her Majesty’s Inspectors) are found to be harsher than those who inspect schools on a freelance basis (Ofsted Inspectors).
{"title":"Are some school inspectors more lenient than others?","authors":"C. Bokhove, John Jerrim, Sam Sims","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2240318","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2240318","url":null,"abstract":"School inspections are a common feature of education systems across the word. These involve trained professionals visiting schools and reaching a high-stakes judgement about the quality of education they provide. By their nature, school inspections rely upon professional judgement, with different inspectors potentially putting more emphasis on certain areas than others. Yet there is currently little academic evidence investigating the consistency of school inspections, including how judgements vary across inspectors with different characteristics. We present new empirical evidence on this matter, drawing upon data from more than 30,000 school inspections conducted in England between 2011 and 2019. Male inspectors are found to award slightly more lenient judgements to primary schools than their female counterparts, while permanent Ofsted employees (Her Majesty’s Inspectors) are found to be harsher than those who inspect schools on a freelance basis (Ofsted Inspectors).","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44498318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-25DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2238698
M. Ehren, J. Hutchinson, B. Muñoz-Chereau
{"title":"Place-based disparities faced by stuck schools in England: a contextual understanding of low performance and the role of inspection outcomes","authors":"M. Ehren, J. Hutchinson, B. Muñoz-Chereau","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2238698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2238698","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45445104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2213219
Joris Van Elsen, J. Faddar, Lies Appels, S. de Maeyer, J. Vanhoof, P. van Petegem
ABSTRACT In order to support research on school effectiveness, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to assess policymaking capacities of schools. Increasingly, policymaking is seen as a shared responsibility of the entire pedagogical team of a school. In this article, data were analysed from a sample of 1,696 (care) teachers coordinators and principals from 77 Flemish primary schools to assess critical aspects concerning validity and reliability of the Policy Making Capacities Questionnaire (PMC-Q). Confirmatory factor analysis indicates that the fit for the model with eight factors is limited. The subscales were found to be strongly correlated and difficult to distinguish, and one of the subscales turned out to be not well captured by the questionnaire. The results indicate sufficient interrater reliability and within-group agreement to aggregate responses to school level. Suggestions are made for further development of the PMC-Q and its use for research and practice.
{"title":"Measuring policymaking capacities of schools: validation of the Policy Making Capacities Questionnaire (PMC-Q)","authors":"Joris Van Elsen, J. Faddar, Lies Appels, S. de Maeyer, J. Vanhoof, P. van Petegem","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2213219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2213219","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In order to support research on school effectiveness, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to assess policymaking capacities of schools. Increasingly, policymaking is seen as a shared responsibility of the entire pedagogical team of a school. In this article, data were analysed from a sample of 1,696 (care) teachers coordinators and principals from 77 Flemish primary schools to assess critical aspects concerning validity and reliability of the Policy Making Capacities Questionnaire (PMC-Q). Confirmatory factor analysis indicates that the fit for the model with eight factors is limited. The subscales were found to be strongly correlated and difficult to distinguish, and one of the subscales turned out to be not well captured by the questionnaire. The results indicate sufficient interrater reliability and within-group agreement to aggregate responses to school level. Suggestions are made for further development of the PMC-Q and its use for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42481241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-02DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2206806
C. Gao, Xueke Bi
ABSTRACT Education systems focus on issues related to school effects and differences. School effects are used as a basis for accountability in various countries including China. This study investigated the stability and cross-disciplinary consistency of value-added estimates based on student scores in selected schools in a city in central China. The results show that the school effects exhibited long-term stability and consistency across subject areas, with the gross effects model being more stable than the value-added model. In addition, the study found a direct link between school ranking and stability in China. Ranking schools more reasonably and holding schools accountable are focal issues in the Chinese education system.
{"title":"Stability and consistency of school effects: evidence from senior high schools in China","authors":"C. Gao, Xueke Bi","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2206806","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2206806","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Education systems focus on issues related to school effects and differences. School effects are used as a basis for accountability in various countries including China. This study investigated the stability and cross-disciplinary consistency of value-added estimates based on student scores in selected schools in a city in central China. The results show that the school effects exhibited long-term stability and consistency across subject areas, with the gross effects model being more stable than the value-added model. In addition, the study found a direct link between school ranking and stability in China. Ranking schools more reasonably and holding schools accountable are focal issues in the Chinese education system.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42513383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-04DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2196081
P. Gouëdard, M. Kools, B. George
ABSTRACT For 3 decades, policymakers, educators, and scholars have been appealed to the promises of the learning organisation concept. Drawing from the last Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS 2018), this paper is the first to use a large-scale cross-country survey to assess the robustness of the relationship between schools operating as learning organisations and teachers’ outcomes, a pivotal question for school improvement and effectiveness. Multiple regression analysis highlights that the factors underpinning a school as a learning organisation (namely, culture of inquiry, shared vision, growing leadership, lower professional learning barriers, and teamwork) have a positive impact on teachers’ job satisfaction and self-efficacy. Policymakers, school staff, and other education stakeholders can use these findings as supporting evidence to engage with the learning organisation concept. Indeed, in times of increased strain on teachers across the globe, becoming a learning organisation can prove a vital shield against deteriorating teachers’ wellbeing.
{"title":"The impact of schools as learning organisations on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: a cross-country analysis","authors":"P. Gouëdard, M. Kools, B. George","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2196081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2196081","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For 3 decades, policymakers, educators, and scholars have been appealed to the promises of the learning organisation concept. Drawing from the last Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS 2018), this paper is the first to use a large-scale cross-country survey to assess the robustness of the relationship between schools operating as learning organisations and teachers’ outcomes, a pivotal question for school improvement and effectiveness. Multiple regression analysis highlights that the factors underpinning a school as a learning organisation (namely, culture of inquiry, shared vision, growing leadership, lower professional learning barriers, and teamwork) have a positive impact on teachers’ job satisfaction and self-efficacy. Policymakers, school staff, and other education stakeholders can use these findings as supporting evidence to engage with the learning organisation concept. Indeed, in times of increased strain on teachers across the globe, becoming a learning organisation can prove a vital shield against deteriorating teachers’ wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41503493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-19DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130
Gloria A. Koh, H. Askell‐Williams, Shyam Barr
ABSTRACT There are reports about school improvement initiatives that have been successfully implemented and evaluated within relatively brief time scales. However, many initiatives do not survive over longer terms. Our purpose in this study was to identify successful strategies for achieving long-term school improvement. We interviewed 12 leaders at four educational sites. We adopted complex adaptive systems perspectives to analyse the interview transcripts, provide rich descriptions of contexts, illustrate examples of practices, and synthesise participants’ accounts to highlight key areas for attention and action. Participants described purposeful programme selection with clear goals, strategic staff leadership and continuous professional education, accountable professional networks, data sharing and feedback, time and resource management, distributed multilevel leadership, and a supportive school culture. We recommend adopting a complex adaptive systems perspective to communicate and facilitate processes of change, including planning, enacting, and evaluating school improvement as a continuous long-term process rather than as an end product of any singular initiative.
{"title":"Sustaining school improvement initiatives: advice from educational leaders","authors":"Gloria A. Koh, H. Askell‐Williams, Shyam Barr","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There are reports about school improvement initiatives that have been successfully implemented and evaluated within relatively brief time scales. However, many initiatives do not survive over longer terms. Our purpose in this study was to identify successful strategies for achieving long-term school improvement. We interviewed 12 leaders at four educational sites. We adopted complex adaptive systems perspectives to analyse the interview transcripts, provide rich descriptions of contexts, illustrate examples of practices, and synthesise participants’ accounts to highlight key areas for attention and action. Participants described purposeful programme selection with clear goals, strategic staff leadership and continuous professional education, accountable professional networks, data sharing and feedback, time and resource management, distributed multilevel leadership, and a supportive school culture. We recommend adopting a complex adaptive systems perspective to communicate and facilitate processes of change, including planning, enacting, and evaluating school improvement as a continuous long-term process rather than as an end product of any singular initiative.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46169072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795
Richard O. Welsh, Luis A. Rodriguez, Blaise B. Joseph
ABSTRACT Racial inequality in school discipline is a salient challenge in the United States. Using New York City as a case, this study examines inclusive disciplinary schools (IDS) or schools that have “beat the school discipline odds”. IDS, median disciplinary schools (MDS), and high disciplinary schools (HDS) have vastly different exclusionary discipline rates for Black and Latinx students (both suspensions and office discipline referrals). The schooling environments of IDS differ from those of HDS and MDS. IDS have greater teacher and school leader diversity, more experienced teachers and school administrators, and a more positive school climate than HDS. Poverty and unemployment rates, crime rates, education levels, and the proportion of Black and foreign-born residents vary significantly across the neighborhoods of IDS, MDS, and HDS. These results remain largely consistent across limiting IDS to predominantly Black schools, predominantly Latinx schools, or predominantly low-income schools. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
{"title":"Beating the school discipline odds: conceptualizing and examining inclusive disciplinary schools in New York City","authors":"Richard O. Welsh, Luis A. Rodriguez, Blaise B. Joseph","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Racial inequality in school discipline is a salient challenge in the United States. Using New York City as a case, this study examines inclusive disciplinary schools (IDS) or schools that have “beat the school discipline odds”. IDS, median disciplinary schools (MDS), and high disciplinary schools (HDS) have vastly different exclusionary discipline rates for Black and Latinx students (both suspensions and office discipline referrals). The schooling environments of IDS differ from those of HDS and MDS. IDS have greater teacher and school leader diversity, more experienced teachers and school administrators, and a more positive school climate than HDS. Poverty and unemployment rates, crime rates, education levels, and the proportion of Black and foreign-born residents vary significantly across the neighborhoods of IDS, MDS, and HDS. These results remain largely consistent across limiting IDS to predominantly Black schools, predominantly Latinx schools, or predominantly low-income schools. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44322910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-03DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2172049
M. Tuytens, Eva Vekeman, G. Devos
ABSTRACT The importance of strategic planning and human resource management (SHRM) for school effectiveness and improvement has been stressed. Yet, research shows that both are challenging aspects of school management. This qualitative study explores (a) the role of strategic planning in SHRM and (b) the link between SHRM and the factors that stimulate teachers’ professional learning. Based on 194 semistructured interviews with school leaders and team members, a comparative analysis between excellent and moderate strategic schools was conducted. The results reveal that excellent strategic schools distinguish themselves through strategic planning that focuses on core aspects of students’ learning and a working environment that is characterized by a highly motivated teacher team and various chances for teachers to learn from each other. The study provides an insight into how a “learning-focused” working environment can be enhanced by enacting a set of human resource practices.
{"title":"A focus on students’ and teachers’ learning through strategic human resource management","authors":"M. Tuytens, Eva Vekeman, G. Devos","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2172049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2172049","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The importance of strategic planning and human resource management (SHRM) for school effectiveness and improvement has been stressed. Yet, research shows that both are challenging aspects of school management. This qualitative study explores (a) the role of strategic planning in SHRM and (b) the link between SHRM and the factors that stimulate teachers’ professional learning. Based on 194 semistructured interviews with school leaders and team members, a comparative analysis between excellent and moderate strategic schools was conducted. The results reveal that excellent strategic schools distinguish themselves through strategic planning that focuses on core aspects of students’ learning and a working environment that is characterized by a highly motivated teacher team and various chances for teachers to learn from each other. The study provides an insight into how a “learning-focused” working environment can be enhanced by enacting a set of human resource practices.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42109842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}